Detection of twin pregnancies in ewes by pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assay and transabdominal ultrasonography

Detection of twin pregnancies in ewes by pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assay and transabdominal ultrasonography

Journal Pre-proof Detection of twin pregnancies in ewes by pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assay and transabdominal ultrasonography Hasan Alkan, Meh...

965KB Sizes 0 Downloads 23 Views

Journal Pre-proof Detection of twin pregnancies in ewes by pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assay and transabdominal ultrasonography Hasan Alkan, Mehmet Bugra Kivrak, Fatma Satilmis, Mustafa Agah Tekindal, Dursun Ali Dinc PII:

S0739-7240(19)30077-3

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106399

Reference:

DAE 106399

To appear in:

Domestic Animal Endocrinology

Received Date: 10 June 2019 Revised Date:

23 August 2019

Accepted Date: 11 September 2019

Please cite this article as: Alkan H, Kivrak MB, Satilmis F, Tekindal MA, Dinc DA, Detection of twin pregnancies in ewes by pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assay and transabdominal ultrasonography, Domestic Animal Endocrinology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106399. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1

Detection of twin pregnancies in ewes by pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assay

2

and transabdominal ultrasonography

3 4

Running Title: Determination of twin pregnancies in sheep

5 6

Hasan Alkana*, Mehmet Bugra Kivrakb, Fatma Satilmisa, Mustafa Agah Tekindalc, Dursun

7

Ali Dinca

8 9

a

Selcuk University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Obstetrics and

10

Gynecology, Konya, Turkey.

11

b

12

Gynecology, Sivas, Turkey.

13

c

14

Turkey.

Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Obstetrics and

Selcuk University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Biostatistics, Konya,

15 16

*

17

Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alaeddin Keykubat Campus, 42003,

18

Selcuklu/Konya, Turkey, Phone: +90 537 580 21 54, E-mail: [email protected]

Corresponding author: Hasan ALKAN, Selcuk University Faculty of Veterinary

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1

26

Abstract

27

The objective of the present study were to evaluate and compare the accuracy of

28

transabdominal ultrasonography and pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) assay in the

29

diagnosis of twin pregnancies in ewes and to evaluate the utility of the PAG assay for

30

predicting fetal gender in singleton pregnancies. The animals in the study consisted of 179

31

pregnant ewes. The number of fetuses in the ewe was determined using transabdominal

32

ultrasonography between days 40 and 60 (on days 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60). Blood samples

33

were collected from all the ewes on the same day to determine the PAG concentrations.

34

The results found were high sensitive for twin pregnancies detection by transabdominal

35

ultrasonography. The accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography in detecting twin

36

pregnancies was found to be higher on day 60 than on other days (P < 0.05). The

37

sensitivities of PAG assay in detecting twin pregnancies on days 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60

38

were 91.67%, 66.67%, 81.82%, 88.89%, and 33.33%, respectively. The accuracies of the

39

PAG assay in detecting twin pregnancies on days 40, 45, and 50 were found to be

40

statistically significant higher than other days (P < 0.05). The PAG assay had low

41

sensitivity, specificity for predicting fetal gender. It was concluded that twin pregnancies in

42

ewes can be diagnosed with high accuracy using transabdominal ultrasonography on day

43

60 of pregnancy and as well as using the PAG assay during the early days of pregnancy

44

(on days 40, 45, 50). The PAG assay is not useful for predicting fetal gender.

45

Keywords: Fetal Gender, Multiple pregnancy, Ultrasonography, PAG, Sheep.

46

1. Introduction

47

Nutritional requirements are shown significantly different among the non-pregnant,

48

pregnant and multiple pregnant ewes. Multiple pregnant ewes require special care in terms

49

of maintenance and nutrition during the last days of pregnancy [1]. The detection of the

50

number of fetuses is of particular importance for appropriate transfer and maintenance of

2

51

ewes, to minimize the mortality rate in ewes and lambs, to reduce the incidence of

52

dystocia, and to prevent metabolic diseases, such as pregnancy toxemia [2-4].

53

Ultrasonography is the most common method used to determine the number of

54

fetuses in pregnant ewes. Studies have also attempted to determine the number of fetuses

55

using other methods, such as the measurement of progesterone concentrations,

56

radiographic investigations, and doppler ultrasonography. However, controversies exist

57

regarding the accuracy and applicability of these methods [4-6]. Therefore, inexpensive

58

and less labor-intensive methods are preferred in field conditions [7]. The method to be

59

used for ultrasonographic examination varies depending on the pregnancy period,

60

ultrasound probe used, working environment, and experience of the operator [7]. Multiple

61

pregnancies can be diagnosed with high accuracy by transrectal ultrasonography between

62

days 25 and 40 and by transabdominal ultrasonography between days 45 and 100 [6,7].

63

However, the animals must have been fasting for at least 8 hours prior to transrectal

64

ultrasonography, and the rectum must be emptied. Transabdominal ultrasonography from

65

the ventral abdominal wall is difficult especially in wool breeds. The need for shaving this

66

area may be time consuming and labor intensive [3, 8].

67

The pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) assay can be used to diagnose

68

pregnancy [9] and determine the number of fetuses in pregnant ewes [10]. PAG is of

69

placental origin and often synthesized in the binucleate cells, although it is expressed in

70

both the mono- and binucleate cells of the ruminant’s trophectoderm. PAG can be detected

71

in the maternal blood at the time when trophoblastic binucleate cells begin migrating and

72

fusing with endometrial cells [11,12]. Therefore, PAG is a good indicator of pregnancy and

73

for determining fetomaternal status. PAG concentrations can be determined using

74

radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) [13]. The plasma PAG

75

concentration in ewes begins to increase between 3 and 4 weeks of gestation with the

3

76

increasing trend continuing until 9 weeks and the concentration becoming constant

77

between 9 and 16 weeks of gestation [14].

78

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare the accuracy of

79

transabdominal ultrasonography and the PAG assay for the diagnosis of twin pregnancies

80

in ewes and to evaluate the utility of the PAG assay in predicting fetal gender in singleton

81

pregnancies.

82

2. Materials and Methods

83

All procedures in this study were approved by the Experimental Animal Breeding

84

and Research Center Ethics Committee of Selcuk University Faculty of Veterinary

85

Medicine (2018/100).

86

2.1. Animals, estrus and mating

87

The animals in the study consisted of 179 pregnant Kangal-Akkaraman ewes aged 2–

88

6 years and weighing 60–75 kg, with at least one parturition. All procedures were

89

performed between September and December, which is the breeding season. The ewes

90

were housed in an establishment (39°26'40. 5"N 37°02'27. 7"E), which belongs to the

91

Sheep and Goat Breeders’ Association in the province of Sivas. The farm houses a total of

92

1200 Kangal-Akkaraman sheep. They were fed with alfalfa hay, straw, corn silage, and

93

concentrated feed.

94

The ewes at natural estrus were mated with fertile rams using hand mating. For this

95

purpose, teaser rams were used to find the ewes in estrus. Then, all ewes were separated

96

into a paddock to mate with a certain ram determined beforehand, and the mating was

97

monitored. The day of mating was considered as day 0.

98

2.2. Determination of the number of fetuses using transabdominal ultrasonography

99

The number of fetuses in pregnant ewes was determined using transabdominal

100

ultrasonography (5 MHz, convex transducer, Mindray DP50, China) at five different time

4

101

points between days 40 and 60 after mating (on days 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60).

102

Ultrasonographic examination (USG) was performed in the standing position. After the gel

103

was applied onto the abdominal probe, the transducer was placed on the hairless region just

104

above the udder in the ventral side of the right paralumbar fossa. This inguinal region was

105

fully screened up to the dorsal–caudal regions of the udder if no signs of pregnancy were

106

observed. During this examination, the diagnosis of twin pregnancies was established if

107

multiple parts relating to fetus were observed, such as two fetal heads, fetal heartbeats, or

108

entire bodies.

109

2.3. Blood Sampling

110

Following transabdominal ultrasonography of all ewes, 10 ml of blood was

111

withdrawn from the jugular vein into a tube without anticoagulants. Blood samples were

112

centrifuged at 3000 × g for 15 minutes immediately after withdrawal. The serum were then

113

stored at −20 °C until the analysis of PAG concentrations. Blood samples were collected

114

on the same days when ultrasonographic examinations were performed.

115

2.4. Lambing Records

116

The ewes that were determined to be pregnant were monitored until lambing. All the

117

ewes were examined during the lambing. The number and gender of lambs were recorded.

118

2.5. Determination of PAG concentrations

119

Serum samples were analyzed using the IDEXX Pregnancy Test. This test uses

120

monoclonal antibodies directed against PAG, which are set on a microplate and will bind

121

to PAG present in the sample. Secondary antibodies coupled with a signal amplification

122

system were used for detection. The enzyme substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine was

123

used as a colored indicator to detect PAG concentrations in the sample. After stopping the

124

reaction, the optical density of each well was read at the wavelength of 450 nm. The results

5

125

were calculated and expressed as sample-negative. For serum samples, if the result was

126

≥0.3 ng/ml, the samples were considered as positive (pregnant), and if the result was <0.3

127

ng/ml, they were considered as negative (not pregnant) [15].

128

2.6. Statistical Analysis

129

The SPSS 25 software package (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for

130

Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used to evaluate the data. Firstly,

131

descriptive statistics of continuous values were presented as mean ± standard deviation and

132

frequency (percentage). The conformity of data with repeated-measures analysis of

133

variance (ANOVA) was evaluated by the Mauchly’s sphericity test and Box-M variance

134

homogeneity test. Factorial repeated-measured ANOVA was used in the comparison of

135

mean values. Either the Greenhouse–Geisser [16] with the correction for degrees of

136

freedom or the Huynh–Feldt [17] test was used if the requirements for parametric tests

137

were not met (factorial repeated-measured ANOVA). A Bonferroni test was used in case of

138

multiple comparisons. The variables were evaluated after testing if they met the

139

prerequisites for normality and homogeneity of variances (Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s

140

tests). In the data analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative

141

predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy were calculated. The

142

relationships between categorical variables were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test and

143

Chi-square test. In cases where the expected frequencies were less than 20%, Monte Carlo

144

simulation was used for the inclusion of these frequencies in the analysis. The performance

145

of a test can be defined by the diagnostic capability of the test, or the capacity to accurately

146

distinguish subjects from subgroups (Twin or Singleton / Sheep, etc.). The cut-off scores of

147

PAG values in twin/singleton and female/male births were evaluated by ROC analysis.

148

AUC Value, Sensitivity, Specificity values were calculated. Cutting points were evaluated

6

149

according to Youden Index. P values <0.05 and <0.01 were considered statistically

150

significant.

151

3. Results

152

A total of 179 Kangal-Akkaraman ewes were examined for fetal number

153

determination in the different days of pregnancy. The day of pregnancy and the number of

154

sheep examined are shown in table 1.

155

3.1. Lambing Records

156

According to the lambing records, it was observed that 117 ewes singleton (65.36%)

157

and 62 ewes twin (34.63%) born. Fetal number of the ewes are shown in table 1 in the

158

different days of pregnancy.

159

The gender of the offspring of the ewes born singleton were 52 (44.44%) female and

160

65 (55.55%) male, and is given in table 2 according to the different days of pregnancy.

161

3.2. Transabdominal ultrasonography results

162

Of the 29 ewes examined by transabdominal ultrasonography on day 40, singleton

163

pregnancies were detected in 18 (62.06%) ewes, and twin pregnancies were detected in 11

164

(37.93%) ewes. Of the 38 ewes examined on day 45, singleton pregnancies were detected

165

in 32 (84.21%) ewes, and twin pregnancies were detected in 6 (15.78%) ewes. Of the 33

166

ewes examined on day 50, singleton pregnancies were detected in 27 (81.81%) ewes, and

167

twin pregnancies were detected in 6 (18.18%) ewes. Of the 42 ewes examined on day 55,

168

singleton pregnancies were detected in 31 (73.80%) ewes, and twin pregnancies were

169

detected in 11 (26.19%) ewes. Of the 37 ewes examined on day 60, singleton pregnancies

170

were detected in 26 (70.27%) ewes, and twin pregnancies were detected in 11 (29.72%)

171

ewes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive

172

likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography

7

173

during different periods of pregnancy in diagnosing twin pregnancies are shown in Table 3.

174

The accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography in diagnosing twin pregnancies was

175

found to be higher on day 60 than on the other days (P < 0.05).

176

3.3. PAG results

177

PAG concentrations of single and twin pregnancies on days 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60

178

are presented in Figure 1. The PAG concentrations increased with rising gestational age.

179

The PAG concentrations in the ewes with twin pregnancies were higher than in those with

180

singleton pregnancies. This difference in PAG concentrations was statistically significant

181

on days 40, 45, and 50 of pregnancy (P < 0.05).

182

Different cut-off values were determined for all PAG concentration measurements

183

performed on different days of pregnancy for the diagnosis of twin pregnancies.

184

Accordingly, the cut-off values determined on days 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 were 0.684,

185

1.277, 1.205, 1.111, and 1.99 ng/ml, respectively (Figure 2). Based on these results,

186

sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy of

187

the PAG assay in diagnosing twin pregnancies are presented in Table 4. The sensitivity and

188

specificity values of the PAG concentration measurements during the early periods of

189

pregnancy (days 40, 45, and 50) were found to be high. Therefore, it was concluded that

190

the PAG assay can be used for early diagnosis of twin pregnancies.

191

PAG concentrations were also evaluated to predict fetal gender during different

192

periods of pregnancy in ewes with a singleton pregnancy (Figure 3). Accordingly, the cut-

193

off values determined on days 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 of pregnancy were 0.58, 0.54, 0.96,

194

0.75, and 1.91 ng/ml, respectively (Figure 4). The sensitivity, specificity, positive

195

likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy of the PAG assay for predicting

196

fetal gender are presented in Table 5. It was concluded that PAG assay is not useful for

197

predicting fetal gender.

8

198

4. Discussion

199

In recent years, many studies have investigated the PAG assay for the diagnosis of

200

pregnancy in cows, sheep, and goats [9,15,18,19]. Moreover, some studies involving ewes

201

have attempted to detect multiple pregnancies using PAG concentration measurements [10,

202

12, 20]. In this study, PAG concentration measurement and transabdominal

203

ultrasonography were performed simultaneously on different days of pregnancy and the

204

optimum day of examination was investigated for the diagnosis of twin pregnancies.

205

Ledezma-Torres et al. [20]

reported that plasma PAG concentrations begin to

206

increase between weeks 3 and 4 of pregnancy with the upward trend sustaining until week

207

9, after which PAG concentrations remain constant until week 19. Therefore, the present

208

study evaluated the PAG concentrations between days 40 and 60 of pregnancy. There was

209

a statistically significant difference between ewes with singleton and twin pregnancies in

210

terms of PAG concentrations on days 40, 45, and 50 (P < 0.05). However, no statistically

211

significant difference was found between the PAG concentrations on days 55 and 60 (P >

212

0.05). El Amiri et al. [12] have also reported higher plasma PAG concentrations during the

213

early periods of pregnancy in ewes with multiple pregnancies. In their study, Robert et al.

214

[21] found that the PAG concentration 4 weeks before parturition was higher in ewes with

215

twin lambs than in those with a single lamb. So, PAG concentrations during pregnancy

216

may vary depending on the number of fetuses [10, 22]. The variability in PAG

217

concentrations is associated with the number of binucleate cells in fetal trophectoderm

218

[21]. Ranilla et al. [10] suggested that the reason for higher PAG concentration in ewes

219

with twin pregnancies was the presence of more attachment points. They reported that

220

ewes with two placentas had a higher secretory activity. In this study, it was speculated

221

that the reason for high PAG concentrations in ewes with twin fetuses is the increased

222

number of binucleate cells and increased PAG secretion due to larger placental size.

9

223

In previous studies, multiple pregnancies in ewes were detected by measuring

224

progesterone concentrations [4], by ultrasonography [8, 23], by measuring PAG

225

concentrations [10, 12, 21], and by measuring placental diameters [24]. The present study

226

attempted to diagnose twin pregnancies by simultaneously performing transabdominal

227

ultrasonography and PAG concentration measurements on different days of pregnancy. It

228

was noted that transabdominal ultrasonography was more accurate in diagnosing twin

229

pregnancies with increasing pregnancy period, whereas PAG concentration measurement

230

was more useful for diagnosing twin pregnancies during early periods of pregnancy. Dias

231

et al. [23] reported higher accuracy for transabdominal ultrasonography performed on day

232

35 in ewes with a singleton pregnancies compared to those with twin pregnancies (P <

233

0.05). Furthermore, the accuracy of this method was reported to vary depending on the

234

experience of the operator [23]. Jones et al. [8] reported that the accuracy of

235

transabdominal ultrasonography before day 45 of pregnancy decreased with increasing

236

number of fetuses. In singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies, the accuracy was reported to

237

be 100%, 87%, and 31%, respectively. The accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography in

238

detecting the number of fetuses was 78%. Hence, transabdominal ultrasonography could be

239

used to determine the number of fetuses. However, it has been reported that the

240

determination of multiple pregnancies can be improved by taking into account the early

241

placental development and fetal findings [8]. In this study, it was observed that the most

242

appropriate day for determining twin pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasonography

243

with high accuracy is day 60 of pregnancy. Yotov [4] compared estimation of progesterone

244

concentrations and transrectal ultrasonography for determining the number of fetuses in

245

ewes. It was reported that progesterone concentration measurement should be performed

246

on day 60 and transrectal ultrasonography should be performed on day 40. However, the

10

247

results of the study by Yotov [4] may differ from the results of this study because

248

transrectal ultrasonography was used in the former study.

249

The present study attempted to diagnose twin pregnancies by measuring PAG

250

concentrations on different days of pregnancy. The accuracies of the receiver operating

251

characteristic (ROC) analysis performed on day 40, 45 and 50 of pregnancy for

252

determining twin pregnancies was found to be statistically significant higher than other

253

days. However, it was found that the accuracy of the test decreased with increasing

254

pregnancy period. Karen et al. [3] found that the sensitivity of the PAG-RIA test in

255

detecting twin pregnancies was 64.1%, and the specificity was 62.3% between days 43 and

256

56 of pregnancy. In this study, the sensitivity was 91.67% and the specificity was 58.82%

257

on day 40. The sensitivity values were higher than those reported by Karen et al. [3].

258

Therefore, PAG concentration was found to be adequate in determining twin pregnancies

259

on day 40 of pregnancy. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the test on day 50 of

260

pregnancy were found to be 81.82%, 77.27%, and 59%, respectively. The accuracy of the

261

test on day 50 is similar to that reported by Karen et al. [3]. However, our sensitivity and

262

specificity values were higher than those reported by Karen et al. [3], who stated that the

263

efficacy of the PAG assay was low in detecting twin pregnancies. On the contrary, Roberts

264

et al. [21] suggested that the PAG concentration measurement could be used effectively as

265

a marker of the number of fetuses in crossbreed ewes. Ranilla et al. [10] reported that the

266

number of fetuses affects PAG production during the last 3 months of pregnancy and that

267

PAG concentration measurement could be effective in determining twin pregnancies

268

during this period. Barbato et al. [25] reported that PAG concentrations were higher in

269

multiple pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies between days 24 and 50. However,

270

because of individual differences, it was suggested that new studies should be performed in

271

order to determine multiple pregnancies using this measurement. In the present study, it

11

272

was concluded that the PAG assay could be used during the early periods of pregnancy (on

273

days 40, 45, and 50) for determining twin pregnancies.

274

Placental development varies according to the number, gender, size, and weight of

275

the fetus. The weight and size of male fetuses are larger than that of female fetuses. For

276

this reason, the placenta develops to a greater extent in mammals with male fetuses, and

277

thus, PAG production increases [26-28]. Ranilla et al. [11] found that PAG concentration

278

was higher in ewes carrying male fetuses than in ewes carrying female fetuses during

279

weeks 19, 20, and 21 of pregnancy. According to these results, the gender of the fetus has

280

been reported to affect PAG production. However, the present study found no statistical

281

difference between PAG concentrations in ewes carrying male and female fetuses during

282

different periods of pregnancy. It was thought that the difference between Ranilla et al.

283

[11] and this study was related to different pregnancy periods. According to the ROC curve

284

analysis, the accuracy of the PAG assay was found to be very low in this study. Therefore,

285

it was concluded that the prediction of fetal gender is not possible based on the PAG

286

concentration measurement.

287

In conclusion, it was observed that twin pregnancies could be determined with high

288

accuracy by transabdominal ultrasonography in ewes on day 60 of pregnancy. On the

289

contrary, the PAG assay can detect twin pregnancies with high accuracy during the early

290

stages of pregnancy (on days 40, 45, and 50). Besides, increasing the number of animals

291

was recommended to achieve more significant results. And it was also concluded that the

292

PAG concentration is not affected by fetal gender, and hence, it cannot be used for

293

predicting fetal gender.

294

Acknowledgements

295 296

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

12

297

Conflict of Interest Statement

298

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

299

References

300

[1] Marai IFM, Owen JB. New techniques in sheep production. 1st ed. London,

301 302

Butterworth-Heinemann; 1987. [2] Dinç DA, Taşal İ, Erdem H, Semacan A, Aral S. Koyunlarda transabdominal

303

ultrasonografi ile yavru sayımı. Vet Bil Derg. 1994;10(1-2):81-83.

304

[3] Karen A, Amiri BE, Beckers JF, Sulon J, Taverne MAM, Szenci O. Comparison of

305

accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography, progesterone and pregnancy-associated

306

glycoproteins tests for discrimination between single and multiple pregnancy in

307

sheep. Theriogenology 2006;66:314–322.

308

[4] Yotov S. Determination of the number of fetuses in sheep by means of blood

309

progesterone assay and ultrasonography. Bulg J Vet Med. 2007;10:185–193.

310

[5] Fukui Y, Kobayashi M, Tsubaki M, Tetsuka M, Shimoda K, Ono H. Comparison of

311

two ultrasonic methods for multiple pregnancy diagnosis in sheep and indicators of

312

multiple pregnant ewes in the blood. Anim Reprod Sci. 1986;11:25-33.

313

[6] Karen A, Kovács P, Beckers JF, Szenci O. Pregnancy diagnosis in sheep: Review of

314

the most practical methods. Acta Vet Brno. 2001;70:115–126.

315

[7] Fthenakis GC, Arsenos G, Brozos C, Fragkou IA, Giadinis ND, Giannenas I,

316

Mavrogianni VS, Papadopoulos E, Valasi I. Health management of ewes during

317

pregnancy. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012;130:198–212.

318

[8] Jones AK, Gately RE, McFadden KK, Zinn SA, Govoni KE, Reed SA. Transabdominal

319

ultrasound for detection of pregnancy, fetal and placental landmarks, and fetal age

320

before Day 45 of gestation in the sheep. Theriogenology 2016;85:939–945.

321

[9]

Chaves

CMS,

Costa

RLD,

13

Duarte

KMR,

Machado

DC,

322

Paz CCP, Beltrame RT. Visual ELISA for detection of pregnancy-associated

323

glycoproteins (PAGs) in ewe serum. Theriogenology 2017;97:78-82.

324

[10] Ranilla MJ, Sulon J, Mantecón AR, Beckers JF, Carro MD. Plasma pregnancy-

325

associated glycoprotein and progesterone concentrations in pregnant Assaf ewes

326

carrying single and twin lambs. Small Rumin Res. 1997;24:125–131.

327

[11] Ranilla MJ, Sulon J, Carro MD, Mantecon AR, Beckers JF. Plasmatic profiles of

328

pregnancy-associated glycoprotein and progesterone levels during gestation in Churra

329

and Merino sheep. Theriogenology 1994;42(3):537-545.

330

[12] El Amiri B, Sousa NM, Alvarez Oxiley A, Hadarbach D, Beckers JF. Pregnancy-

331

associated glycoprotein (PAG) concentration in plasma and milk samples for early

332

pregnancy diagnosis in Lacaune dairy sheep. Res Vet Sci. 2015;99:30–36.

333

[13] Sousa NM, Ayad A, Beckers JF, Gajewski Z. Pregnancy-associated glycoproteins

334

(PAG) as pregnancy markers in the ruminants. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006; 57(Suppl

335

8):153–171.

336

[14] Shahin M. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) profiles in cows and goats and

337

attempts to measure PAG in milk. 2013. Doctoral dissertation, Niedersächsische

338

Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen.

339

[15]Byrem TM, Velek K, Pearse HL. The Detection of Pregnancy Associated

340

Glycoproteins (PAG) in Routine Milk Recording Samples as an Indicator of

341

Pregnancy in Dairy Cattle. Glob Stand Livest Data. 2012. ICAR, Rome, Italy.

342 343

[16] Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959;24(2):95-112.

344

[17] Huynh H, Feldt LS. Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from

345

sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of educational

346

statistics, 1976;1(1):69-82.

14

347

[18] Karen A, Beckers JF, Sulon J, Melo De Sousa N, Szabados K, Reczigel J, Szenci O.

348

Early pregnancy diagnosis in sheep by progesterone and pregnancy-associated

349

glycoprotein tests. Theriogenology 2003;59:1941–1948.

350

[19] González F, Cabrera F, Batista M, Rodríguez N, Álamo D, Sulon J, Beckers JF,

351

Gracia A. A comparison of diagnosis of pregnancy in the goat via transrectal

352

ultrasound scanning, progesterone, and pregnancy-associated glycoprotein assays.

353

Theriogenology 2004;62:1108–1115.

354

[20] Ledezma-Torres RA, Beckers JF, Holtz W. Assessment of plasma profile of

355

pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) in sheep with a heterologous (anti-

356

caPAG55+59) RIA and its potential for diagnosing pregnancy. Theriogenology

357

2006;66:906–912.

358

[21] Roberts JN, May KJ, Veiga-Lopez A. Time-dependent changes in pregnancy-

359

associated glycoproteins and progesterone in commercial crossbred sheep.

360

Theriogenology 2017;89:271–279.

361

[22] Serrano B, López‐Gatius F, Santolaria P, Almería S, García‐Ispierto I, Bech‐Sabat G,

362

Sulon J, De Sousa NM, Beckers JF, Yániz JL. Factors affecting plasma

363

pregnancy‐associated glycoprotein 1 concentrations throughout gestation in

364

high‐producing dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anım. 2009;44(4):600-605.

365

[23] Dias LMK, Souza JCD, Assis RDM, Raymundo CDM. Pregnancy diagnosis, fetal

366

quantification and gender estimation by ultra-sonography in ewes. Ciênc agrotec

367

2009;33(3):911-916.

368

[24] Kaşikçi G, Yilmaz OT, Gündüz MC, Kirşan I. Comparison of placentome diameters

369

in single and twin-pregnant sheep by ultrasonographic method. Turkish J Vet Anim

370

Sci. 2011;35:187–191.

371

[25] Barbato O, Sousa NM, Debenedetti A, Canali C, Todini L, Beckers JF. Validation of a

15

372

new pregnancy-associated glycoprotein radioimmunoassay method for the detection

373

of early pregnancy in ewes. Theriogenology 2009;72(7):993-1000.

374 375 376 377

[26] Echternkamp SE. Relationship between placental development and calf birth weight in beef cattle. Anim Reprod Sci. 1993;32:1–13. [27] Ferrell CL. Factors influencing fetal growth and birth weight in cattle. 1993. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports/132. Date of access: 20.06.2018

378

[28] Lampl M, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Nien JK, Frongillo EA, Romero R. Sex

379

differences in fetal growth responses to maternal height and weight. Am J Hum Biol.

380

2010;22(4):431-443.

381

16

1

TABLES

2

Table 1. Number of singleton and twin lamb of sheep examined on different pregnancy days

3

according to lambing records. Pregnancy days 40 days

45 days

50 days

55 days

60 days

Total

Single (%)

17 (58.62)

29 (76.31)

22 (66.66)

24 (57.14)

25(67.56)

117(65.36)

Twin (%)

12 (41.37)

9 (23.68)

11 (33.33)

18 (42.85)

12(32.43)

62 (34.63)

Total (n)

29

38

33

42

37

179

4 5

Table 2. Gender of singleton lambs of sheep examined on different pregnancy days according

6

to their lambing records. Pregnancy days 40 days

45 days

50 days

55 days

60 days

Total

Female (%)

8 (47.05)

9 (31.03)

12 (54.54)

15 (62.5)

8 (32.0)

52 (44.44)

Male (%)

9 (52.94)

20 (68.96)

10 (45.45)

9 (37.5 )

17 (68.0)

65 (55.55)

Total (n)

17

29

22

24

25

117

7

8

Table 3. Sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value

9

(NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR) and accuracy of the

10

transabdominal ultrasonography on different days of pregnancy

Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) +LR -LR Accuracy

11

40 day 76.92 66.66 71.42 72.72 2.30 0.34 0.720

45 day 96.55 55.55 87.5 83.33 2.17 0.06 0.8684

Pregnancy days 50 day 90.90 36.36 74.07 66.66 1.42 0.25 0.7272

55 day 100 61.11 76.66 100 2.57 0 0.8292

60 day 96.15 91.66 96.15 91.66 11.53 0.04 0.9473

12

Table 4. Optimum cut-off PAG values and respective sensitivity, specificity, area under the

13

curve (AUC), standard error (SE), likelihood ratio (LR) and accuracy of the twin prediction in

14

different days of pregnancy in sheep. Pregnancy days

PAG concentrations Cut-off (ng/ml)

AUC

SE

40 day

0.684

0.760

0.0912

45 day

1.277

0.766

0.107

50 day

1.205

0.798

0.0988

55 day

1.411

0.764

0.0749

60 day

1.99

0.543

0.109

95% CI for AUC 0.5660.898 0.6010.888 0.6220.917 0.6080.881 0.3720.708

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Spesificity (95% CI)

+LR

-LR

Accuracy

P

91.67

58.82

2.23

0.14

0.5049

0.004

66.67

89.66

6.44

0.37

0.5632

0.013

81.82

77.27

3.60

0.24

0.5909

0.002

88.89

58.33

2.13

0.19

0.4722

0.065

33.33

92

4.17

0.72

0.2533

0.692

15

16

Table 5. Optimum cut-off PAG values and respective sensitivity, specificity, area under the

17

curve (AUC), standard error (SE), likelihood ratio (LR) and accuracy of the fetal gender

18

prediction in different days of pregnancy in sheep.

19 20

Pregnancy days

PAG concentrations Cut-off (ng/ml)

AUC

SE

40 day

0.58

0.618

0.145

45 day

0.54

0.572

0.114

50 day

0.96

0.558

0.131

55 day

0.75

0.522

0.130

60 day

1.91

0.511

0.123

95% CI for AUC 0.3560.837 0.3760.753 0.3440.767 0.3110.728 0.3050.714

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Spesificity (95% CI)

+LR

-LR

Accuracy

P

55.56

75.0

2.22

0.59

0.3056

0.41

25.0

100

-

0.75

0.2500

0.52

80.0

50.0

1.60

0.40

0.3000

0.65

33.33

80.0

1.67

0.83

0.1333

0.86

76.47

-

0.76

-

0.2353

0.92

1

FIGURES

2 3

Figure 1. PAG concentrations belong to sheep delivered singleton and twin on different days of

4

pregnancy (*P<0.05, each differs from singleton and twin).

5 6 7 8 9

10

11

12 13

Figure 2. ROC analysis of the PAG concentrations in the determination of twin pregnancies on 40, 45,

14

50, 55 and 60 days of pregnancy.

15 16

Figure 3. PAG concentrations belong to ewe carrying male and female fetus on different days of

17

pregnancy.

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 29

Figure 4. ROC analysis of the PAG concentrations in the determination of gender of the fetus on 40,

30

45, 50, 55 and 60 days of pregnancy

31