Development of a double antibody radioimmunoassay for quantitation of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

Development of a double antibody radioimmunoassay for quantitation of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

97 Clinica Chimica Acta, 189 (1990) 97-110 Elsevier CCA 04636 Development of a double antibody radioimmunoassay for quantitation of 1~,25-d~ydrox~t...

955KB Sizes 0 Downloads 32 Views

97

Clinica Chimica Acta, 189 (1990) 97-110 Elsevier

CCA 04636

Development of a double antibody radioimmunoassay for quantitation of 1~,25-d~ydrox~ta~n D Franz-Paul Armbruster, Helmut Reichel, Gisela Vogel, Harris Georgousis and Heinrich Schmidt-Gayk Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg (FRG) (Received 15 November 1988; revision received 5 September 1989; accepted 28 September 1989)

Key worak la,25Diiydroxyvitamin

Ds; RIA; Double antibody separation

A sensitive radioimmunoassay (RIA) for la,25dihydroxyvitamin D fla,25(OH),D] with a double antibody (DAB) separation technique to separate free from bound antigen has been developed. The hormone was extracted from 1 ml serum or plasma by Extrelut@ columns and normal phase high performance liquid chromatography and qu~titated in the DAB-RIA. The detection limit of the assay was 3.75 rig/l.. The intraassay variation coefficients were 15.9% and 10.5% for samples with la,25(OH),D, concentrations of 54 rig/l and 130 rig/l,, respectively. The interassay variation coefficients were 18.0% and 16.7% for these twp concentrations. Mean (and SD) values for 1,25(OH),D in serum of 40 healthy subjects and 38 patients with chronic renal faihue who did not receive 1,25(08),4 were 62.8 ng/ml(22.2) and 12.4 ng/ml (9.8), respectively. The mean value for 7 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism was 66.5 ng/ml(35.8) before surgery. These results compared well with those of an established charcoal-based RIA. Compared to charcoal-based RIAs, the DAB-RIA is faster and requires less laborious assay procedures.

Abbreviations: 1~,25(0H)~D~, la,2Sdiiydroxyvitamin Ds; 25(OH)4, 25hydroxyvitamin Ds; 24(R), 25(OH)2Ds, 24(R),2klihydroxyvitamin 4; la(OH)Ds, la-hydroxyvitamin D,; la,24(R),25(OH),Ds, la,24(R),2S-trihydroxyvitamin Ds; 25(S),26(OH),Ds, 25(S),26dihydroxyvitamin D,; 23(S),2S(R)-25 (OH)Ds-26,23-lactone, 23(S),2S(R)-2S-hydroxyvitamin Ds-26,234actone; RIA, radioimmunoassay; DAB, double antibody separation; Ab, antibody; DBP, vitamin D-binding protein; BSA, bovine serum albumin, HPLC, high performance liquid c~omat~phy. Correspondence to: Dr. Helmut Reichet, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Bergheimer Str. %a, D-6900 Heidelberg, FRG. 0009.8981/90/%03.50

0 1990 Rlsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)

98

Inroduction lcu,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, The biologically active vitamin D, metabolite, [la,25(OH),D,], is one of the major hormonal regulators of calcium metabolism in man [1,2]. The quantitation of la,25(OH),D is clinically useful in a variety of disorders which lead to alterations in the concentrations of circulating hormone. These disorders include chronic renal failure [3,4], hyperparathyroidism [5,6] and hypoparathyroidism [3], rickets syndromes [8,9] sarcoidosis [lo], and tumor-associated hypercalcemia [11,12]. Various assays for quantitation of lcu,25(OH),D in serum or plasma have been described. The assays differ considerably in methodology, technical requirements and assay time. Techniques which have been used for la,25(OH),D measurements include dilution-mass fragmentography [13], bioassay [14,15], competitive protein binding assay [16-191, cytoreceptor assay [20-211, and radioimmunoassay (RIA, 22-291. The standard method to separate free from bound antigen in la,25(OH)*D assays was separation by charcoal or hydroxylapatite. Double antibody (DAB) techniques in competitive binding assays usually are associated with a more specific separation of bound from free antigen. However, the use of DAB separation for steroid hormone assays was problematic because of high nonspecific binding and low maximal binding of the antigen to antibody. In this paper, we describe the development of a DAB-RIA for lar,25(OH)*D. Materials and methods Chemicals Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and Norit A (activated charcoal) were obtained from Serva, Heidelberg, FRG. Gelatine, Brij”-35, dextran T 70 and buffer reagents were obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, FRG. The following buffers were used. BSA buffer: phosphate buffer (pH 7.4; 0.06 mol/l) with 1 g/l BSA, 1 g/l sodium azide and 0.4 g/l EDTA. Gelatine buffer [30]: phosphate buffer (pH 7.4; 0.06 mol/l) with 2 g/l gelatine, 1 g/l sodium azide and 0.4 g/l EDTA. Rinsing buffer: 9 g/l NaCl with 1 g/l Brij-35. Vitamin D metabolites la,25(OH),D,, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, [25(OH)D,] and 24(R),25dihydroxyvitamin D, [24(R),25(OH),D,] were from Duphar B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Vitamin D,, vitamin D,, la-hydroxyvitamin D, [lcw(OH)D,], 24@),25(OH),D,, lcr,24(R),25-trihydroxyvitamin D, [la,24(R),25(OH),D,], 25(S),26-dihydroxyvitamin D, [25(S),26(OH),D,], 23(S),25(R)-25-hydroxyvitamin D,-26,23-lactone [23(S),25(R)-25(OH)D,-26,23 lactone] and 23(R),25(S)-25(OH)D,-26,23-lactone were kindly provided by Dr. A.W. Norman, University of California Riverside, USA. la,25(OH),[23,24(n)-3H]D3 (specific radioactivity 180 Ci/mmol), 25(0m23,24(n)3H]D3 (specific radioactivity 102 Ci/mmol) and 24,25(0H),[23,24(n)-3H]D3 (specific activity 90 Ci/mmol) were from Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, FRG. The purity of all vitamin D metabolites was demonstrated by high performance

99

liquid chromatography (HPLC). All metabolites were dissolved in absolute ethanol and stored at -20°C. The radioinert metabolites were quantitated by UV-spectrophotometry and used at the indicated concentrations. Antisera The first antiserum (Code: KH 090478) was raised in rabbits against a 3-hemi-

succinate derivative of la,25-(OH),D3 bound to BSA [25D. The antiserum was kindly provided Dr. R. Bouillon, Louvain, Belgium. Donkey-antirabbit-IgG (own production) was used as the precipitating antiserum for the double antibody separation. Both the first and second antibody (Ab) were diluted as whole serum and as gamma globulin fractions [31]. The BSA and gelatine buffers were used as dilution media. Unless indicated otherwise, the 1st Ab was used at 1 : 64,000 dilution. The 2nd Ab was used at a 1: 11 dilution. Normal rabbit serum or normal rabbit IgG (Dako Inc., Hamburg, FRG) were added to l,st Ab solution at the indicated concentrations. I cy,25(OH), D-RIA The extraction of la,25(OH),D

from 1 ml serum or plasma by Extreluta columns and HPLC was carried out as described [27]. The tests were performed in duplicate in special RIA vials [32] (600 ~1 total volume, Sarstedt, Ntimnrecht, FRG) in an ice water bath at 4°C. The la,25(OH),D fractions from HPLC were dried down and taken up in ethanol. T’he HPLC fractions or vitamin D-metabolite standards were transferred to assay vials, evaporated under nitrogen and redlssolved in 300 ~1 BSA buffer or gelatine buffer. Approximately 5,500 cpm 1a,25(OH),[3H]D,, dissolved in 20 ~1 ethanol, were added. After the addition of 100 ~1 1st Ab, the assay was incubated for 12 h at 4” C. Double antibody separation

After addition of 100 ~12nd Ab solution, the assay was incubated at 4” C for 1 h. The bound phase was pelleted by centrifugation (10 min X ‘1,800 X g). The supernatant was removed and discarded. The sediment was rinsed with 500 ~1 buffer and centrifuged again (10 min X 1,800 X g). The supernatant was discarded, the protein precipitate s dissolved in 10 ~1 1 N NaOH and 250 ~1 scintillation fluid (Pica-Fluor &T 15, Packard Instrument, Frankfurt, FRG) were added to the RIA vials. After vigorous mixing, the radioactivity was measured In a liquid scintillation counter (Model LS 7000, Beckman Instruments Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA). Charcoal separation

The charcoal-based RIA was carried out as described [27]. For separation of bound from free antigen, 100 ~1 of charcoal suspension (1.25 g Norit A and 0.125 g Dextran T 70 per 100 ml aqua dest.) were added, incubated for 2 min and then centrifuged for 10 min at 1,800 X g. 400 ~1 of clear supematrnt were transferred to Pica plastic vials (Packard Instruments) and mixed with 3 ml of scintillation fluid. The tritium contents of the samples were measured by liquid scintillation counting.

The experiments to determine the optimal rinsing solution for the pellet were carried out with the following reagents: (i) whole first antiserum, diluted to 1 : 40,000 with BSA buffer; (ii) normal rabbit serum as precipitation adjuvant; (iii) BSA buffer; (iv) whole second antiserum, diluted to 1 : 11. To determine the effect of DBP on the assay, 4 ml of normal rabbit serum or 40 mg rabbit IgG were added to one liter of 1st Ab-solution. For the binding experiments, appro~mately 20 fmol of la,25(OkI),[3H]D3, 25(OH)[3H]D, or 24,25(OH)J3H]D3 were used. The calculation of the affinity constants for the antibody were carried out as described [33].

Results

Initially, DAB separation was performed with reagents that were routinely used in a charcoal-based RIA [27]. We found that these conditions led to high non specific binding of k~,25(0H),[~H]D~ (> 30% of maximal binding). We then tried to reduce the non-specific binding by testing various rinsing buffers to wash the sediment. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The best conditions were obtained with a 9 g/l NaCl solution containing 1 g/l Brij-35. Nonspecific binding was 60-80 cpm,

:: ::. ii :: :: :: :: :: ‘: :: :: ::

:: :. ::

::

Fig. 1. Effects of various rinsing conditions on non specific binding in the DAB-RIA. The assay-reagents contained DBP. The 1st Ab was used at a 1:4O,GOO dilution; incubation times were 12 h for 1st and 1 h for 2nd Ab. Rinsing solutions contained NaCl (9 g/l) and the indicated additives. The results are the means of 2 experiments, each performed in duplicate. NSB, nonspecific binding; 1254, la,254ihydroxyvitamin 4; &,, maximal binding; HSA, human serum albumin.

101

and the maximum binding was 1000-1100 cpm. The non specific binding was clearly lower than specific binding at conditions of maximal displacement of tracer by 1 ng radioinert la,25(OH),D,. For all further experiments, the sediment was rinsed after double antibody separation with 500 ~1 NaCl solution containing 1 g/l Brij-35. Incubation time To determine the incubation period until equilibrium of the antigen-Ab reaction, 25(OH)[3H]D3 or Lx,~~(OH),[~H]D, (about 5000 cpm/tube) were added to the 1st Ab. The experiments were performed either under DBP-free conditions or with buffers containing DBP. The reactions were stopped after various incubation times by charcoal separation. An incubation time of approximately 10 hr was sufficient for the antigen-antibody reaction to reach an equilibrium (data not shown). The DBP had no effects on this time-point. For all further experiments, we chose a 12 hr incubation time for the 1st Ab reaction. Influence of DBP on maximal binding The effects of DBP on assay binding conditions were examined by successively removing DBP from 1st Ab, normal rabbit serum, 2nd Ab and buffer. The albumin in the buffer (dilution reagent for the 1st and 2nd Ab) was replaced by gelatine since the crude albumin preparation contained trace amounts of DBP. Gamma globulin fractions of 1st and 2nd antisera were prepared and used in the assay. Normal rabbit serum (4 ml/l) for precipitation was replaced by pure rabbit IgG (40 mg/l). Six different combinations of DBP-containing and DBP-free assay-reagents were tested. The results are shown in Fig. 2. The lowest binding of la,25(OH),D, to antibody (2.0% of total activity) occurred with normal rabbit serum as precipitation adjuvant. When rabbit IgG was used for precipitation, maximal binding rose markedly to 22.5%. Similarly, the use of gamma globulin fractions instead of whole antisera markedly increased maximal binding (Fig. 2). By using the 1st Ab as a gamma globulin fraction, maximal binding rose from 27.5% to 34.6%. When whole second antiserum was replaced by the gamma globulin fraction, maximal binding increased from 22.5% to 27.5%. By replacing albumin in the buffer with gelatine, maximal binding rose from 2.0% to 3.2%. As shown in Fig. 3, the specificity of the assay for lcu,25(OH),D, was decreased under DBP-free conditions. After elimination of DBP from the assay, the binding of 25(OH)D, and 24(R),25(OH),D3 to the 1st Ab rose from -z 1% of total activity to 22.2% and 8.68, respectively. When binding of Lx,~~(OH)~D, to the antibody was set as lOO%, the specific binding of 25(OH)D3 and 24(R),25(OH),D3 was 8.0% and l&O%, respectively, when assay reagents contained DBP. Under DBP-free conditions the relative binding of 25(OH)D, and 24(R),25(OH),D, increased to 62.0% and 24.08, respectively. The experiments described above demonstrated that maximal binding of la,25(OH),D, to the antibody could be achieved with DBP-free assay reagents. In all further experiments, the 1st Ab was used as gamma globulin fraction and diluted

102

[pm MOO-

l!iOO-

1000

-

500-

O-

/I

Gelatrne

lAnKbody

///

Gela

he

IV

V

Gektme

Gelatrne

V/

Geld

tune

]

Fig. 2. Effects of DBP in assay reagents on maximal binding of the l~x,25(OH)~D DAB-MA. Reagents with DBP (shaded areas) were replaced by DBP-free reagents (white areas) as indicated under ‘Materials and Methods’. The results are the means of 2 experiments, each performed in duplicate. BSA, bovine serum albumin; NRS, normal rabbit serum; NR-IgG, normal rabbit IgG.

in gelatine buffer to 1: 64,000. Under these conditions, the binding of 1~1,25(0H)~D~ was approximately 35% of total activity. Affinity The affinity constants of the 1st Ab for lcu,25(OH),D, and 25(0H)D3 were determined according to the method of Scatchard [33]. With DBP-free reagents, the affinity constant for lu,25(OH),D, was 2.7 X 10” l/mol. The affinity constant for 25(OH)D3 was 1.2 x 10” l/mol (data not shown).

103

B/T x mo we

-(OH193

EI

1,25

n

2.5 -o/f-o,

61

Z&25-tOH&D3

30-

20.

lo-

o-

I

Buffer

Second Antibody

I

EL.m

I

L.m

Geldtine

Gelatine

I

Fig. 3. Effects of DBP in assay reagents on binding of la,25(OH),Dj, 25(0H)D3 and 24(R),25(OH),Ds in the DAB-RIG. Conditions were as described in the Iegend of Fig. 2. The results are the means of 2 experiments, each performed in duplicate. BSA, bovine serum albumin; NRS, normal rabbit serum; NR-IgG, normal rabbit IgG; B/T, bound vitamin DB metaboIite/totaI activity.

The assay was further characterized by determining the cross-reactivity of the antibody with other vitamin D metabolites (Fig. 4). The indicated amounts of radioinert metabolites were added to the 1st Ab and l~r,25(0H),[~H]D,. Assay conditions were either with DBP (Fig. 4a) or without DBP (Fig. 4b). Cross-reactivity was calculated at the point of 50% competition. lcu,25(OH),D3 displaced the tracer in assays with DBP with a potency that was 20-fold higher than 25(OH)D3. Under

m-m

f-.n*o~

o-o

%.P.O,

c -0

%&MI

.m,,.DJ

Fig. 4. Cross-reactivityof various vitamin D metabolites in the la,25(OH)~D RIA. a. The RIA was out with charcoaI-separationof bound from free anti&enexactly as de&bed in ref. [27]. b. The RIA was carried out with DAB separation under DBP-free conditions. B/B,, bound antigen/maximal binding.

carried

DBP-free conditions, the ratio decreased to 3.8. Similar results were obtained with 24(R),25(OH),D,. The cross-reactivity of other vitamin D metabolites was neghgible under conditions with DBP. As shown in Fig. 4, elimination of DBP from the assay also led to a higher interference by the other metabolites. Precision The precision of the DAB-RIA was examined by measuring serum samples

containing la,25-(OH)*D concentrations of 54 rig/l,, 130 rig/l or below detection limit. Aliquots of each sample were measured 12 times in one assay. The intraassay variation coefficients for the samples with 54 and 130 rig/l were 15.9% and 10.5% respectively. AU ahquots of the sample with low la,25-(OEQ2D were below detection limit. The samples were also measured in nine consecutive assays. The variation coefficients for interassay variance were 18.0% and 16.7% for the 54 rig/l and 130

105

b

rig/l samples, respectively. In all nine tests no la,25(OH),D samples below detection limit.

was found in the

Clinical studies

lcu,25(OH),D was quantitated in serum from 40 healthy subjects (age 20 to 34), from 21 patients with preterminal renal failure, from 20 patients ‘on chronic hemodialysis, and from 7 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The results are shown in Fig. 5. The mean concentration of lcw,25(OH),D in healthy subjects was 62.8 rig/l (SD 22.2, range 23.0-118.5, median 64.2). One sample from an apparently healthy donor, which yielded lar,25(OH),D concentrations above 150 pg/rnl both in the DAK-RIA and the charcoal-based reference assay [27] was excluded. The mean concentration of lo,25(OH),D in the 19 patients with preterminal renal failure was 17.4 rig/l (SD 10.6, range 4.4-42.9, median 15.0). The mean creatinine clearance of these patients was 14.3 ml/min (SD 7.3, range 6.0-35.0, median 13.5). None of the patients were treated with vitamin D metabolites.

106

150

1

. i

125

. . . . : .

i

.

:

.

75

.. .. : . .. . .. . 51

. .

.

. . . . z!

i

.

e

l** l*

;

1:

._ii.z_ .

...

---_

------

SUBJECTS

.

.

I

FAILURE

detectmn ii/it-

PRIMARY b PARA THY/?0

Fig. 5. Circulating lc~,25(OH)~D of normal subjects, patients with chronic renal failure and patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The samples were measured by the DAB-RIA under standard conditions. * , After parathyroidectomy.

Patients on hemodialysis who did not receive vitamin D metabolites (n = 17) had a mean la,25(OH),D serum concentration of 6.3 rig/l (SD 2.7, range < 3.8-13.7, p -E0.001 vs. preterminal renal failure by Student’s t test). Two hemodialysis patients who received 0.25 pg lcu,25(OH),D,/day had la,25(OH),D levels of 20.1 rig/l and 28.0 rig/l,, respectively; one patient on 0.5 c(g lcu,25(OH),D,/day had a lcu,25(OH),D level of 27.7 rig/l.. k,25(OH),D serum levels in the patient group with primary hyperparathyroidism (n = 7) varied over a range of 14.8-122.9 rig/l.. The mean lcu,25(OH),D concentration was 66.5 rig/l (SD 35.8). Circulating

107

1,25(OH),D was measured in 2 patients before and after subtotal parathyroidectomy. The respective values were 109.2 ng/ml (one day before surgery), 26.2 ng/ml (7 days after surgery); and 77.9 ng/ml(3 days before surgery), 31.8 ng/ml (10 days after surgery). The results of the DAB-RIA were directly compared with a standard RIA [27] using the same extraction steps and charcoal-based separation of bound from free 1,25(OH),D. Serum samples from healthy subjects, patients with chronic renal failure and primary hyperparathyroidism (n = 65) were assayed by both methods. When DCC-RIA data were plotted on the abscissa, and DAB-RIA were plotted on the ordinate, the correlation-coefficient for this comparison was 0.843 (n = 65), with a slope of 1.19 and an intercept of -12.7. Discussion

In this paper, we describe the development of a Lx,~~(OH)~D-RIA which utilizes a double antibody technique (DAB) for separation of bound from free antigen. Initially, DAB separation was carried out with reagents from a charcoal-based assay. This procedure was associated with two main problems: (i) high nonspecific binding of la,25(OH)J3H]D3 to vials and sediments; and (ii) low maximal binding of la,25(OH)*D3 to 1st Ab. The first problem of high non specific binding was overcome by washing the sediment after the DAB separation with 500 ~1 NaCl solution (9 g/l) containing 1 g/l Brij-35. Brij-35 proved to be an optimal reagent for removing nonspecifically bound antigen without impairing the antigen-antibody binding. Thus, non specific binding could be reduced from previously 30%40% to < 10% of maximal binding. DBP in the la,25(OH),D RIA could reduce the 1~,25(0H)z[~H]D~ available for binding to the antibody and, therefore result in decreased maximal binding. To solve the second problem, DBP was systematically removed from all 4 DBP sources in the assay (1st Ab, normal rabbit serum, 2nd Ab, and buffer). The 1st and 2nd antibodies were added as gamma globulin fractions. Normal rabbit serum (precipitation adjuvant) was replaced by normal rabbit IgG, and the albumin in the BSA buffer was replaced by gelatine. We found that normal rabbit serum strongly interfered with the assay by reducing maximal binding. Similarly, whole 1st and 2nd antisera markedly decreased maximal binding as compared to conditions where gamma globulin fractions were used. In contrast, the effect of BSA buffer which contained only trace amounts of DBP was less pronounced. Taken together, the elimination of DBP from the assay enhanced maximal binding of lc~,25(OH),D~ from 2% to approximately 35%. The sensitivity and the precision of the DAB-RIA were comparable to those of a previously described assay [27] with identical pre-purification of samples and charcoal separation of bound and free antigen. The variation coefficients of intraand interassay variances were between 10% and 18%. The variation was mostly contributable to the extraction procedure, since the DAB technique in our RIA vials [32] gave a variation coefficient of less than 5%.

108

The DAB-RIA was validated by quantitating la,25(OH),D in samples from healthy individuals and from patients with several clinical disorders. The mean serum la,25(OH),D of healthy subjects was in the range of previously published values. The DAB-RIA was further tested by measuring samples from patients with reduced kidney function. In accordance with the literature, circulating la,25(OH),D was markedly lower in these patients. The assay also distinguished between hemodialysis patients and patients with preterminal renal failure in that chronic dialysis patients had lower la,25(0H),D+alues than patients with preterminal renal failure (mean creatinine clearance 14.3 ml/mm). While most previous reports have communicated elevated mean la,25(OH)2D in primary hyperparathyroidism, considerable overlap between normals and hyperparathyroid patients (up to 80%) has been found [20,26,34]. The average la,25(0H),D-value for the 7 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism was higher than the average for normal subjects; however, there was wide variation of circulating la,25(OH),D. la,25(OH),D-concentrations were markedly decreased in two patients whose serum was evaluated several days after subtotal parathyroidectomy. Brown and Peacock [35] and Bouillon et al. [25] found that the presence of DBP in la,25(OH),D-RIAs led to an increase in specificity but to a decrease in sensitivity. These observations were confirmed by our studies. We showed that under DBP-free conditions the binding of both 25(OH)D, and 24(R),25(OH),D, increased markedly from less than 1% of total activity to 22.2% and 8.6%, respectively. Likewise, the crossreactivity of various vitamin D metabolites to the 1st Ab rose when DBP was eliminated from the assay. Therefore, purification procedures which do not achieve complete separation of la,25(OH),D from other major vitamin D metabolites would overestimate la,25(OH),D values in the DAB-RIA. Our current extraction procedure with Extrelut columns and HPLC is suitable for the DAB-RIA since the la,25(OH),D-values obtained by the DAB-RIA are in good agreement with a reference assay and the literature. Taken together, the DAB separation is faster and easier to perform than charcoal separation. The use of special RIA vials with only 250 ~1 scintillation fluid/ tube is economic and reduces the amount of radioactive waste. Possibly, our method is also useful for the development of DAB-RIAs for other steroid hormones which are bound to carrier proteins. References 1 Norman AW, Roth J, Orci L. The vitamin D endocrine system: Steroid metabolism, hormone receptors, and biological response (calcium binding proteins). Endocrinol Rev 1982;3:331-366. 2 Reichel H, Koeffler HP, Norman AW. The role of the vitamin D endocrine system in health and disease. N EngJ J Med 1989;320:980-991. 3 Haussler MR, Baylink DJ, Hughes MR. The assay of la,25dihydroxyvitamin Ds: Physiologic and pathologic modulation of circulating hormone levels. Chn Endocrinol 1976;5:151s-165s. 4 Feinfeld DA, Sherwood LM. Paratbyroid hormone and 1,25(OH),D, in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 1988;33:1049-1058. 5 Broadus AE, Horst RL, Lang R, Littledike TE, Rasmussen H. The importance of circulating 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D in the pathogenesis of hypercalciutia and renal-stone formation in primary hyperparathyroidism. N Engl J Med 1980;302:421-426.

109 6 Haussler MR McCain TA. Basic and clinical concepts related to vitamin D metabohsm and action. N Engl J Med 1976;297:974-983&1041-1050. 7 Fraser D, Kooh SW, Kind HP, Holick MF, Tanaka Y, DeLuca HF. Patbogenesis of hereditary vitamin-D-dependent rickets. An inborn error of vitamin D metabolism involving defective conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to la,25-dibydroxyvitamin D. N Engl J Med 1973;289:817-822. 8 Brooks MH, Bell NH, Love L, et al. Vitamin-D-dependent rickets type II. Resistance of target organs to 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D. N Engl J Med 1978;298:996-999. 9 Bell NH, Stem PH, Pantzer E, Sinha TK, DeLuca HF. Evidence that increased circulating la,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is the probable cause for abnormal calcium metabolism in sarcoidosis. J Clin Invest 1979;64:218-224. 10 Papapoulos SE, Clemens TL, Fraher LJ, Lcwin IG, Sandler LM, O’Riordan JLH. 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol in the pathogenesis of the hypercalcemia of sarcoidosis. Lancet 1979;i:627-630. 11 Stewart AF, Horst R, Deftos LJ, Cadman EC, Lang R, Broadus AE. Biochemical evaluation of patients with cancer-associated hypercalcemia: Evidence for humoral and non-humoral groups. N Engl J Med 1980;303:1377-1383. 12 Rosenthal N, Insogna KL, Godsall JW, Smaldone L, Waldron JA, Stewart AF. Elevations in circulating 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D in three patients with lymphoma-associated hypercalcemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985;60:29-33. 13 Bjorkhem I, Holmberg I, Kristiansen T, Pedersen JI. Assay of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, by isotope dilution mass-fragmentography. Clin Chem 1979;25:584-588. 14 McCollum EV, Simmonds N, Shipley PG, Park EA. Studies on experimental rickets. A delicate biological test for calcium-depositing substances. J Biol Chem 1922;51:41-49. 15 Stem PH, Hamstra AJ, DeLuca HF, Bell NH. A bioassay capable of measuring one picogram of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D,. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979;146:891-896. 16 Brumbaugh PF, Haussler DH, Bressler R, Haussler MR. Radioreceptor assay for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Science 1974;183:1089-1091. 17 Eisman JA, Hamstra AJ, Kream BE, DeLuca HF. A sensitive, precise, and convenient method for determination of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in human plasma. Arch Biochem Biophys 1976;176:235243. 18 Reinhardt TA, Horst RL, Orf JW, Hollis BW. A microassay for 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D not requiring high performance liquid chromatography: application to clinical studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984;58:91-98. 19 Blayau M, Leray G, Prodhomme C, David V, Peron P. An improved source of receptor for 1,25dihydroxyvitamin Ds assay. Clin Chim Acta 1986;158:199-206. 20 Manolagas SC, Culler FL, Howard JE, Brickman AS, Deftos LJ. The cytoreceptor assay for 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D and its application to clinical studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983;56:751-760. 21 Nicholson GC, Kent JC, Gutteridge DH, Retahack RW. Estimation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D by cytoreceptor and competitive protein binding assays without high pressure liquid chromatography. Clin Endocrinol 1985;22:597-609. 22 Clemens TL, Hendy GN, Graham RF, Baggiolini EG, Uskokovic MR, G’Riordan JLH. A radioimmunoassay for 1,25dihydroxycholecalciferol. Clin Sci 1978;54:329-332. 23 Clemens TL, Hendy GN, Papapoulos SE, Fraher LJ, Care AD, G’Riordan JLH. Measurement of 1,25dihydroxycholecalciferol in man by radioimmunoassay. Clin Endocrinol 1979; 11:225-234. 24 Mason RS, Lissner D, Grunstein HS, Posen S. A simplified assay for dihydroxylated vitamin D metabolites in human serum: Application to hyper- and hypovitaminosis D. Clin Chem 1980;26:444450. 25 Bouillon R, De Moor P, Baggiolini EG, Uskokovic MR. A radioimmunoassay for 1,25dihydroxycholecalciferol. Clin Chem 1980;26:562-567. 26 Peacock M, Taylor GA, Brown W. Plasma 1,25(OH), vitamin D measured by radioimmunoassay and cytosol radioreceptor assay in normal subjects and patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and renal failure. Clin Chim Acta 1980;101:93-101. 27 Scharla S, Schmidt-Gayk H, Reichel H, Mayer E. A sensitive and simplified radioimmunoassay for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D,. Clin Chim Acta 1984; 142:325-338.

110 28 De Leenheer AP, Bauwens RM. Radioimmunoassay for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in serum or plasma. Clin Chem 1985;31:142-146. 29 Hummer L, Christiansen C, Tjellesen L. Discrepancy between serum 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol measured by radioimmunoassay and cytosol radioreceptor assay. Stand J CIin Lab Invest 1985;45:735-733. 30 Samake H, Rajkowski KM, Cittanova N. T’he choice of buffer protein in steroid (enzyme-) immunoassay. CIin Chim Acta 1983;130:129-135. 31 Hebert GA, PeIham PL, Pittman P. Determination of the optimal ammonium sulfate concentration of rabbit, sheep, horse and goat antisera. Appl Microbial 1972;25:26-36. 32 Schmidt-Gayk H, WahI M, Limbach HJ, Walch S. Ein spezielles Gefass zur Durchfttng des Radioimmunoassay (RIA). Medizintechnik 1979;99:103-104. 33 Scatchard G. The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1949;51:6668. 34 Mawer EB. Clinical implications of measurements of circulating vitamin D metabohtes. Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980;9:63-71. 35 Brown WB, Peacock M. Characteristics of antisera to antigenic forms of 1,25diiydroxycholecalciferol. Clin Chim Acta 1986:159:111-121.