Development of supported manganese oxides catalysts for partial oxidation: Preparation and hydrogenation properties

Development of supported manganese oxides catalysts for partial oxidation: Preparation and hydrogenation properties

13 Applied Catalysis,28 (1986) 13-33 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.. Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands DEVELOPMENT OF SUPPORTED PREPARATION...

1015KB Sizes 0 Downloads 51 Views

13

Applied Catalysis,28 (1986) 13-33 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.. Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands

DEVELOPMENT

OF SUPPORTED

PREPARATION

AND HYDROGENATION

Miguel

Alvin

A. BALTANASa,

Center

for

University

Catalytic

3000 Santa 'Mobil

(Received

6. STILES and

- Newark,

FOR PARTIAL

and James

R. KATZERb

Tecnnology,

OXIDATION:

Department

Tecnologico

para

Corporation,

1985, accepted

of

Chemical

Engineering,

I!.S.A.

To whom correspondence

and Development

5 December

CATALYSTS

De. 19716,

de Desarrollo

Fe, Argentina.

Research

OXIDES

PROPERTIES

Science

of Delaware

- Instltuto

aINTEC

MANGANESE

la Industria should

Guemes

345n

be addressed.

Paulsboro,

28 August

Quimica,

N.J., U.S.A.

1986)

ABSTRACT Supported manganese oxide catalysts were prepared by impreonating manqanese salts Mn(OHj2 in situ usinq ammonium onto TiOp, CeOp, A1203 and MgA1204 and precipitating hydroxide. X-ray diffraction and ion scattering spectroscopy showed that the preparation procedure left well-dispersed overlayers on the support surfaces without formation of separate crystalline Mn oxide phases. The catalytic activity for ethylene hydrogenation varied by over three orders of The changes are a function of the support and are magnitude on all the catalysts. apparently related to the reducibility of the surfaces, the hydrolysis of Mn-support bonds and/or structural changes in the MnOx overlayers.

INTRODUCTION The understanding

of catalysts

lyst

structure

and

ture

of Oxides

always

and cations of

a

bination

of

of different

methanol

oxidation

supports,

varied

widely,

model

where

under

of the

Additional

capable

and because

oxidation

oxidation

for oxide

we

and

controlled of measuring

have

and

different

reactions

consist

requires

a com-

[1,2]. reactions

manganese

oxides

of the

-such

on dif-

supports

conditions,

individual

strucgroups,

catalyst

properties

reproducible

of cata-

hydroxyl

hydrogenation

prepared

chemical

knowledge

The surface

anions,

viz. it is polyfunctional

catalysts

physical

implies

reaction.

of oxygen

selective

formaldehyde-

the

oxidation

catalyzed

were

and we have

catalyst

properties

[3].

paper

focuses

MnOx at submonolayer ties

a

of sites, novel

carefully

reactions

or functions This

to

vacancies,

steps,

types

of the

of a combination

anion

to develop

ferent

used

with

elementary

In an effort as

consists

associated

series

for selective

of the mechanisms

on the coverage

resultant

reaction

0166-9834/86/$03.50

preparation on different

catalysts

studies

using

to test

and

characterization

supports

ethylene

highly

dispersed

and on the hydrogenation

hydrogenation

the deep oxidation

0 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

of

as a model

and partial

oxidation

properreaction. activi-

14 ties of these ture

of

which

catalysts

the

are

surface

catalyst

as spectroscopic

surfaces

reactants

under

as well

or

and

products

reducing

and

the

of

structure

oxidation

oxidizing

studies and

to characterize

bonding

reactions,

conditions

are

of

the struc-

simple

molecules,

adsorbed

on the

subject

of-other

the

catalyst papers

C4,81.

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials All obtain

and Catalyst

supports materials

deleterious

Preparation

were

synthesized

of high

promoter

type) were prepared

effects

decomposition

preparation

of aqueous

preparation

through

of

a 35 mesh

incipient

wetness

of manganese the

Trial

incipient Since

with

supports

(Tyler)

sieve.

range;

diluted

(NH4)OH,

nitrates

prepared

K with

criteria

experiments

for

Titania

(anatase)

(A type)

MgA1204

outlined

Alp03

synthesized

obtained

Further

above

material

a dilute

(R

by

by neutra-

details

were

was then

on the

solution

the

were made to determine

of Mn(N03)2.

appropriate

the exact

first

are

uptake

by the

An amount

which

amount

liquid

screened

impregnated

of MnO, on the Support

estimating

and

to any

CeO2 was prepared was

was

(NH4)$03.

or salts

to minimize

[S].

The -35 mesh

at 298

seeking

isopropoxides.

and

as

to give an overlayer

compounds

purity,

Al203

with

are given elsewhere

five

added

impurities.

bicarbonate.

of their

technique

was

monolayer

below.

the

by

of highly

cerium

Al(N03)3

solution

of the supports

Aliquots

caused

of

of the metal

area and very high

by hydrolysis

by thermal

lizing the acidic

by hydrolysis

surface

was below discussed

which

caused

wetness. manganese

nitrate

surface

of the grains

the Mn

ions

were

upon

could

migrate

out

drying

giving

a high

precipitated

in situ,

of the

in the

pores

and

concentration pores

of the

precipitate

on the

of Mn at the surface, particles

using

NH40H,

before drying. After

the

supports

mixed with glass

were

was admitted

cations

the drying.

geneties

hours.

vacuum-NH3

method

in the

Mn-impregnated The dry

system.

the drying

The process

This drying

to a rotary

to the

of multiple

unagglomerated,

with

the Mn solution,

beads to avoid the formation

which was then attached NH3

impregnated

Mn

moist

admission

flask

distribution.

were

uniform

was

Vacuum

cycles.

When

was put in a warm

took about

solid

of lumps and placed

drier.

The precipitation-drying

4 hours

did not work with

powders

This gave apparently

vacuum

then

powders bath

were

and then moist involved

became

appli-

loose

and

(333 K) to accelerate

for each catalyst.

under

calcined

the

solids

into a round flask

was applied procedure

water

Ti02 because

Therefore, dried

the moist

it always

for the vacuum

at 473

inhomo-

of MnO,/Ti02,

at 353 K in a vacuum

for 2 hours

Mn distribution.

led to visual

preparation

K under

oven

the

for 48

flowing

air.

15 Apparatus

and Procedures

X-ray diffraction. to

for

80'

intensity with The

[9]

powdered

Ion

and

built

The finely

on

voltage

of

beam

1.5

surface

KeV

The was was

after

o.o4 ,I.75 =

Z

=

Corporation)

slides.

their

peak

diffractometer using

Cu powder.

To determine

equation

to

the

was applied

support

to the most

of

an

special

into wafers,

a CMA voltage

improve

positioned

the

was

signals

sur-

mounted

on a

being

introduced

of producing

designed a stable

at 6 = 90' and a channel-

1.5

Ti-Mn

interest their

kas a laboratory

capable

ion gun,

gun

the

values

relative

;

height

KeV.

A

Ne ion

resolution

for

beam

with

a

MnOx/Ti02.

The

were at room temperature,

and

were achieved.

oxides

was

determined

from derivative

to oxygen,

energy

as suggested

by

computing

spectra

the

atomic

and empirical

by Wheeler

scat-

[lo]:

Co

intensities

minimizes

(1)

of the metal

and oxygen, and oxygen,

respectively; respectively;

M (oxygen is assigned

an arbitrary

of one). surface

roughness

effects

that

are always

present

in pressed

[ll].

Ethylene

hydrogenation.

tial flow microreactor the

presseo

10m5 tort-. All measurements

of

of

[HICM

cross-section

Powders

were

samples

by ISS to determine

number;

atomic

method

catalyst

The instrument

r

gaseous

detector. 02

increase

at 473 K for 2 hours before

c”,c; = atomic concentration of the metal M g = relative cross-section of the metal

and

in the range 2e = 10'

was calibrated

analyzed

ions,

ion

steady-state

sections

IM,I~ = peak

gas

He

composition

,M =

were

powders

composed

used

using peak-to-peak cross

Three

(Iss).

ground

of noble

in the chamber

ratios,

of

[niano

Scherrer

of the spectrometer.

analyzer.

data were taken

This

recorded

(-50 urn) to

microscope the

sizes,

and then evacuated

ISS spectrometer

energy

tering

were

mesh

Electric

and MnOx/A1203,3)

chamber

mono-energetic

The

325

The diffractometer

mounted

spectroscopy

ISS holder,

the main

vacuum

were

MnOx/CeO2

composition.

tron

General

radiation.

samples

scattering

standard into

XDS-5

patterns

to

lines.

(MnOx/Ti02, face

an

CuKa

ground

over-layer crystal

MnOx

intense

samples

using

Ni filtered

and/or

X-ray diffraction

powdered

Matheson).

U.H.P.

studies

in the range 473-673

components

A schematic were

The hydrogenation

was

of the grade

done

with

experimental

(Matheson);

Gases were purified

by passing

were

carried

K and at 1 atmosphere a HP set-up

the

5750

was

oxygen

pressure.

chromatograph

is shown

ethylene

through

gas

out in a differen-

in Figure research

traps

Analysis

using

a TC

1. The H2, He purity

(CuO activated

(99.98% for 4

16

-

I

BY Pass

L-

Molecular sieve Hz0 trap CuO oxygen trop Rotameter w/ NRS volve Detail of the Pyrex reactor Fine metering valve CAJON@ water injection FIGURE 1 hours

Experimental

at 573

Water was

injected

stainless

steel Cajon

Catalyst (conversion

was

using

The experimental

perature

catalytic on

reoxidation

the

rC2H6 Fp

activity

of

catalyst;

measuring

(1) the effect

effect

reaction

except

where

= molar

5A) cartridges. using a standard

conditions

catalyst

charge

cat./h. reduction of the

catalyst;

(3)

standard

temperature

reduction the

and water

on the reaction under

reactor

Typical

of the effect

of reoxidation

rate

tem-

effect

of

addition

on

rate. These effects conditions

after

indicated.

were determined

Fgxi/W

= ethane

(2) the

of temperature

rates at low conversion

flow

in hydrogen.

He-preactivated

(4) the

the

to the reactor

was lo-13 m3 STP/kg

catalyst;

fresh,

sieve

septum.

differential

of 5% ethylene

determined:

had been achieved

The reaction rC2H6 =

program

(molecular

prior

under

space velocity

of fresh

by

hydrogenation.

feed just

determined

and (5) the effect

determined

steady-state

into the

activity

on used

used catalyst; were

for ethylene

a stream

was 500 mg; the volumetric

on the

port

vacuum tee with a silicone

activity <5%)

5

Hz) and water traps

flowing

on-line

7”

T Vent 01 Flow meters

apparatus

K under

-4

from the following

relation: (2)

formation

rate, kmol/kg

flow rate of reactant

cat./h;

i, kmol/h;

17 TABLE

1

Pretreatments

for atmospheric

Pretreatment

Specimen

Description

Reduction

5

w/hydrogen

II ,I

C

01 ,I

Activation

2 A

w/pure

Reduction ,I

B C

I,

D

Reoxidation

w/oxygen w/pure

In the out

first

at the

conducted increased carrying

from

the

the desired

673 K

2h

473 K

2h

573 K

2h

helium

helium

573 K

2h

(500 ue)

573 K 473 K

2h

i;

to

sequences

catalysts at which

were

were

prereduced,

He

(6~10~~

m3

pure

H2

during

the

for 8 hours

applied

the'catalyst

in

out the reaction

obtaining

2h

kg.

hydrogen zero

4h

573 K

w/hydrogen

same temperature using

473 K

2h

pretreatment

sequence,

2h

2h

of reactant

Two experimental

573 K

473 K

of water

Reduction

weight,

2h

473 K

w/pure

Addition

= catalyst

2h

w/oxygen

Activation

W

573 K 673 K

w/hydrogen

Reoxidation

= conversion

4h

II

Reduction E

473 K

helium

w/hydrogen ,,

Activation

xi

hydrogenation

Code

1 A

Specimen

ethylene

which

half

catalyst reaction

reduced.

The

assured

rate data, the catalyst

and the

was

STP/h). last

to each

carried were

concentration

was

of pretreatment.

achieving

was reduced

was

1).

The reductions

hydrogen hour

(Table

steady-state

After

and after

at the next temperature

in

the sequence.

In the second 573

K

before

completion 1% oxygen

sequence

undergoing

in helium. were

Following

the study

again

reoxidized

During

activated

catalysts

the

of Step C (Table

catalysts

ua

the

same

activated

were

again

of ethylene

in pure

studies

He before

hydrogenation In this

in flowing

procedure

reoxidized

the last half hour a stream

and activated.

the reaction

first

reduction-reaction

l), the catalysts

pulse of water at 573 K before After

were

as

at

After of

was used. The

at 473 K with

at this temperature,

case the catalyst

before.

first with a stream

of pure oxygen

reduction

helium

hydrogen.

the catalyst

was contacted

was

with a 500

reduction.

at 673 K were completed,

the temperature

dependency

of

properties

of impregnation:

298.9

0.91

240.7

2.61

473 K/2 hr

298K; vacuum drying

which was grey-brownish

where 353 K employed. (W. Germany).

Color was dark brown in all cases except MnOx/Ce02

Ebach

temperature

c

Laboratorien,

K in all cases except MnOx/Ti02

wetness;

250.8

From Analitische

at 298-343

Method of preparation:

107.3

0.29

3.63

4.15

1.61

473 K/2 hr

473 K/2 hr

473 K/2 hr

Yes

Yes

MnOx/A1203,B

MnOx/A1203,A

Yes

MnOx/MgA1204

Yes

MnOx/Ce02

prepared

b

a

incipient

1.13

;;l;o;;3afK;;rb,c 2

86.5

5.22

% Mn (A.A.)~

B.E.T. (N2) S.A. (m2lgram)

473 K/2 hr

No

MnOx/Ti02

of the catalysts

Calcination

NH3 treatment

Catalyst

Physical

TABLE 2

FIGURE

2

calcined

X-ray diffraction

patterns.

at 473 K; C) MnOx/Ti02,

A) Ti02

calcined

, calcined at 673 K; B) MnOJTi02,

at 673 K.

49” 368

C

FIGURE

3

calcined

X-ray diffraction

patterns:

at 473 K; C) MnOx/Ce02,

A) Ce02,

calcined

calcined

at 673 K.

at 673 K; B) MnOx/Ce02,

20 TABLE

3

X-Ray diffraction

patterns

of supports

and catalysts

Crystallite Size, i 106

GO

Remarksa

Small amount

of orthorhombic

Same pattern

as Ti02,

More crystallized

Ti02 or Ti0224U

no Mn-related

anatase;

peaks

indication

of some amount

of MnTi04

(haussmanite)

82.8 107

Some Ce(C03)2 Some Ce(C03)2 Manganese

causes

Bayerite

(AI(OH)3)

y-A1203 24

Some y-AlO broad

peaks,

Weak residue Bohmite-

45

No Mn-related

MS-Al-O,

synthetic

II

of y-AlO(

one weak

aluminium

phase related

composition spinels

oxide"

to y-Al203

is a monoclinic

to the spine1

is unknown.

of molecular

50.6

Also peaks from Mg5A1204

73.7

Both systems

is a I:1 ratio

No indication

of Mn-related

tetragonal

peak assigned

peaks

"magnesium

intermediate chemical

hydroxyde-

II

50

- U = centered

peaks

no Mn peaks

oxide

II

42

39.1

broad

peaks

- Bohmite-peaks

BUhmite-aluminium

45

and Bdhmite

no manganese

peaks

y-A1203

48,6

band broadening;

It is observed

ratios

. 15 H20 peaks

structure.

Mg0:A1203

metastable Its

only for larger

than 1:2.5

21

Sample

Treatment

Ti02

Calcined

673 K, 14 h

MnOx/Ti02

Calcined

473 K, 2 h

Patternb

II

CeO,

0,

II

II

673 K, 14 h

CeO,

Calcined

573 K, 14 h

CeO:

MnOx/Ce02

Calcined

473 K, 2 h

CeO;

I,

Calcined

673 K, 2 h

Ce02

Al,O,, L

J

typeA

Dry

Amorphous

(D<20i) (D<2Oi)

II

Calcined

598 K, 14 h

Amorphous

11

Calcined

773 K, 14 h

Y-A1203

Calcined

473 K, 2 h

Amorphous

MnOx/A1203,

A

A1203, type E

y-AlO

Dry

II

Calcined

598 K, 14 h

y-AlO

,I

Calcined

773 K, 25 h

n-Al 203

Calcined

473 K, 2 h

y-AlO

Calcined

673 K, 2 h

n-A1203

MnOx/A1203,

B

II

Calcined

,I

II

MnOx/MgA1204

a Arabic

Amorphous

Dry

MN1204

numeraks

b Ref. 35.

Ti0212U

,I

Amorphous

Dry Calcined

Anatase,

673 K, 14 h

Mg-Al-O,

amorphous

Calcined

773 K, 14 h

II

Calcined

923 K, 16 h

MS-Al-0

Calcined

1073 K, 16 h

Mg-Al-0

Calcined

1273 K, 14 h

MS-Al-O,

MgA1204

Calcined

473 K, 2 h

MS-Al-O,

amorphous

after formulae

stand for the number

II

of atoms

per unit cell

FIGURE

X-ray

4

MnOx/AI203,B,

reaction

diffraction

calcined

rate was determined.

at each temperature mation

After

was increased

temperature.

achieved

A)

First,

Al$l3,

These

independent

and again

experiments

of temperature

showed history

B,

calcined

steady-state the

and that

59B

stepwise

and the desired

at the lowest

that

at

K;

B)

at 673 K.

was decreased

was established

data was obtained stepwise

type

calcined

the temperature

until a steady-state

was achieved.

temperature each

patterns:

at 473 K; C) MnDx/A1203,B

desired

and held

rate infor-

temperature,

the

rate data were obtained same

there

steady-state was

rate

no measurable

at was

aging

observed.

RESULTS

AND DISCUSSION

Preparation A summary

and Structural

2. The surface

areas

same

as

of

MnO,

was

mostly

those

accounted

anatase

impregnation area

of

the

calcination

Characterizations

of the physical

properties

(B.E.T.)

the

for.

(Figure

measured

supports The 2).

X-ray

patterns

(Tables

2 and

3).

prepared after

is given

in Table

Mn addition

were the

addition

when

the

indicated

that

the calcined

changes

were

TfD2 had the largest The MgA1204

weight

observed

crystallites spine1

was

of the

in the

Ti02

and lowest formed

added

titania

was

after

surface

only

after

at 923 K.

The type A Al203 was amorphous nation

for the catalysts to Mn

No significant

and recalcination. supports

prior

of the catalysts

at 598 K, but reverted

bohmite;

to bayerite

the type B Al203 was bohmite during

the Mn impregnation

after

(Figure

calci3). The

23 TABLE

4

Uniform

slab thickness

% Mn before

firing

of hypothetical

at 673 K

Mn(W2

overlayers

of Mn

TiO2

Ce02

A1203,A

A1203,B

MgA1204

5.153

3.23

3.66

4.75

4.16

2.55

1.60

1.81

2.35

2.06

1.65

1.03

1.17

1.52

1.33

2.94

1.49

0.60

0.97

0.82

1.90

0.96

0.39

0.63

0.53

(m3/g of cat.108)a Mn02

Mn(OW2 (m3/m2 of cat.lOl'

=A)

Mn02

aFrom

average

sp. gr. [36]

(i-1)

-b

E 2.U Zdb 0 L. t.s5 2.55 .I T

2

CHAINS

HCP

(2-2)

c

336

FIGURE

5

Single

oxihydroxide,

chain,

double

and dihydroxide

chain,

polymorphs

and

layer

[37].

structure

of the manganese

oxide,

24 I

I

I

I

I

Ti

I

I

MnOx/TiOz

1

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I



0 I)

Mn

Al

I 30

I

I

I

40

50

MnOx/Al203,a

60

I

I

70

80

I

90

I

100

170

E/EoxlOOO

FIGURE

6

ISS spectra

of selected

beam at 1.5 KeV. Spectra after

5 scans.

correspond

catalysts

evacuated

to steady

state

at 473 K. Conditions: values of intensity

Het

ratioes

25 TABLE

5

Atomic

ratios

from ion scattering

spectroscopya

CATALYST

M

O/M

O/Mn

M/Mn

MnOx/Ti02

Ti

3.49

7.33

2.10b

MnOx/Ce02

Ce

1.57

2.75

1.74

MnOx/A1203,B

Al

2.27

6.87

3.3

acalculated

revertion by

its

light

remained The

estimated The

involved at 673

yellow

to

infinite

which

assumed flat

catalysts support

a

added

slab

of the

(Figure

5). the

slab

the

model oxide.

of segregation

dispersion

Figure

6

summarizes manganese

shows values

the

that

the

formation

as it should

some

ratios

the

in Figure

be dehydrated

Pattern

water

(Figure

of

surface

6.

only

4), but

hydration

The average of Figure

was

still

specific

that

far

too

Further

Results

is

simple,

or agglomeration indicated

it

If the surface

or MnO2. the

semi-

overlayers area of the

unit area (m2/g) of each

are

within

summarized oxide the

indicates

phases

in Table

compound

4.

is uni-

submonolayer

no need

XPS [8] studies

to bulk

was

of Mn(flH)2 and

5, and the hypothetical

it

ESR [7] and

over

gravity

if the manganese

surface,

supports

of Mn(OH)2

deposited

by the total

thickness.

indicate

of the

of an overlayer

thickness

were divided

range

for multiple

were unable

to find

of MnO,. This very high

by X-ray diffraction

and ISS as shown by

ISS

They

2-6.

derivative

of the

calculated

surface

could

a Ce02

per gram of catalyst.

support

is

cover

uniform

of

intensity atomic were

the ratio,

ratios low,

and A1203 the oxygen-to-support

value,

evident

could

slab

of Mn was also

3 and 5 and Figures

steady-state

Ti02

on

of manganese

surface Tables

gave

support.

volumes

In all cases the calculations

any evidence

Mn

of

a hypothetical

distributed

bayerite

ceria

from the structures

was used, these to give

Although

was

as m3 of overlayer

formly

layers

it

the hypothetical

surface

expressed

the

that

Mn02 was calculated were

described

[12].

by assuming

model

and the

rehydration,

K. The calcined color,

ln the solid extent

conditions

1.5 KeV.

probably

recalcination

from

1, for the experimental

using equation

Ne+ ion beam,

bFrom

be for surfaces

intensity

usually

using

Equation

indicating cation with

ratio

data.

reached

(1). The

excellent is higher

OH groups,

after

correspond

5 scans. support

dispersion

of

to

Table

5

metal-toMn.

For

than the stoichiometric

even after

evacuation

at 473 K

and beam sputtering. On the MnO,/Ce02

the

oxygen-cerium

ratio was

below two which

is abnormally

low.

for ethylene

473 573 673 473 573 673 473 573

1A

1B

1C

2A

28

2c

2D

2E

4.42d

0.257

1.87

16.0d

163.b

3.51

0.72

1.89

MnOx/Ti02

1.69

6.31

2.57

1.58

7.41d

2.30

1.07

6.00d

MnOx/Ce02

pressure

4.73

o.688c

1.55

2.77d

1.91

1.26

1.78

0.383

MnOx/MgA1204

RATE (kmol ethane/kg

at atmospheric

REACTION

(5%) hydrogenation

16.8

16.6

2.41

3.37

7.70

1.92

3.29

9.58

MnOx/A1203,A

catalyst. h *104) a

10.6d

10.6

2.7Zd

5.54

2.00d

1.97

4.23

3.07

MnOx/A1203,B

z Values at pseudo steady state - as of eight hours onstream. Non differential conditions. i Reaction at 573 K. Transient value. * Pretreatments for protocol 1: 1A) H2 reduction, 4 h @ 473 K; 1B) H2 reduction, 2 h @ 573 K; 1C) H2 reduction, 2 h @ 673 K. Pretreatments for protocol 2: 2A) He preactivation, 2 h @ 573 K, then H2 reduction, 4 h @ 473 K; 2B) H2 reduction, 2 h @ 573 K; 2C) H2 2 H @ 673 K; 2D) 02 2 h @ 473 K, then He preactivation, reduction, 2 h @ 573 K, then H2 reduction, reoxidation, 2 h @ 473 K; 2E) 02 reoxidation, 2 h @ 473 K, then He activation, 2 h @ 573 K, then addition of 0.5ml H20 @ 573 K, then H2 reduction, 2 h @ 473 K.

(K)

Reaction Temperature

activities

Pretreatment

Catalytic

TABLE 6

S?

21 Whether

this

conditions not clear. of

was

a consequence

[12] or was

pure

Therefore, Ce02

samples

showed

stil i

suggestion Additional

XPS

either

surface

experiments

of

anion

by the heavy

0

to

confirmed

that

consistent

surface low

ratio

samples

with

reduction

0-Ce

U.H.V.

[IO] was

The control

ratios,

or the

under

of Ce atoms

studied.

Ce

vacancies

vacancies

matrix

of pure Ce02 were lower

anion

[8]

appearance

caused

control

powder

of

of the

an artifact

to

was

the

Ce203.

not

an

ISS

artifact. From all the results concluded each

that

of

the

supports

separate

crystalline

Ethylene

Hydrogenation

K there

673

K this

MnOx/Ce02 most

was

were

to

the

effect

almost

The

was

of these

higher

MnO,/TiO2

was

high

(close

further

in

lo-fold the

with

increase

first

because

were

no obvious

decreased

again

patterns.

for

the

activation

for ethylene

as compared This

in helium

after

hydrogenation

since

dilution

at

MnO,/Ti02.

The high

condition

was the

increased.

in activity

narrow.

at

but at

by H2 reduction

activity

true

e.g.,

of the high

with further activity than

was made

K. These a

very

with

[14].

reaction

rate

conversion

of ethylene,

was there

set of

activity After

and

reoxidation.

the sequence that

to a value reoxidation

the

the actito

reoxidizing,

catalytic

activity

of reoxidations

was made

reoxidation reoxidation

that

did

An attempt

by successively

by observing

that

and H2 reduction,

For the MnO,/A1203,

MnO,/Ti02

showed

activity,

catalyst.

doubled

levels.

work

experiments

low

reactivation

it was before

K, followed

at 473 K. In this

(nonactivated)

In the final

especially [13,14],

catalysts

the catalysts

at 673 K MnOx/Ti02

differences

differences

at 473

in catalytic

vity of the MnOx/Ti02

was

these

previous

changes

reducing

573 and 673

a catalyst

was

was even higher

for C2H4 hydrogenation at 473,

in

no other pro-

rise.

these and

There

to a differential

of the catalysts,

reoxidation

explore

of

or as

was investigated

among

hydrogenation

catalysts

However,

not bring them back to their

preactivating,

3-fold.

chromia

correspond

little temperature

vity after

oxides

For the nonactivated

in activity

remarkable

this

superior

to 90%).

The reoxidation

manganese

of catalysts

catalysts

observation

reductions

not

two

showed

catalysts;

temperature did

it is

on the surfaces

took place cleanly;

at 473 K, whereas

at 673 K their

be a common

by H2 produces

for very

to

to only

catalyst

catalysts

nonactivated

For

on the Series

difference

reduced

activity

He-activated

reduction

multilayer

of pretreatment.

a 25-fold

difference

seems

as

and ISS data,

dispersed

detected.

the effect

573 K, but upon H2 reduction The

present

of C2H4 to C2H6

was the lnost active

active.

not

diffraction

very well

range 473 K to 673 K. The reaction

6 summarizes

473

were

the X-ray

were

phases.

or side reactions

Table

including

overlayers

and

The hydrogenation the temperature ducts

obtained

the manganese

was

at 673

at 473 K resulted at

573

identical

K caused with

that

K, the catalytic

a of

acti-

over that of the 573 K reoxidation.

experiments

of the second

sequence

(Table 1) after

reoxida

7

8

1.6

1

\@I \

I

the reactor

the reactor

, 2.0

4 2.2

temperature).

on the rate of C2Hq hydrogenation

temperature),

B

?

5

100 1.4

2

4

5

6

7

8

101 9

using MnOJCeO2

using MnOx/Ti02

'3 d

s

I

0 r( . -

t

on the rate of C2Hq hydrogenation

1.8 . 10~ l/T

Effect of temperature

0 increasing

FIGURE 8

Cl\

5

Effect of temperature

0 increasing

FIGURE

1.4

100

5 -

2

MnOf/TiO

l/T

(0 decreasing

2.0

the reactor

the reactor

1.8 IO3 . (0 decreasing

1.6

temperature;

temperature;

2.2

29 TABLE

7

Activation

energy

at 673 K for ethylene

Activation Catalyst

hydrogenation

Energy

Correlation

a

E(kcal/gmol)

Coefficient

MnOx/Ti02

11.2 + 0.9

0.979

MnOx/Ce02

8.6 t 2.0

0.964

MnOx/MgA1204

5.4 -+ 0.4

0.977

MnO,/Al203,A

6.5 + b

MnOx/Al203,B

5.7 + 0.8

0.976

MnOx-Ce02

4.6 t 1.2

0.970

MnO,-MgA1204

5.6 t 1.8

0.762

aFor a confidence bOnly

interval

two temperatures

then

studies

reduced

revealed

673 K.

at 573 K, water

at 473

K and ethylene

the following

. For MnOx/A1203,

treatment

(500 us?) was added at 573 K. The catalysts hydrogenation

a sharp

The activity

increase

then slowly

after 4 hours on stream

. ,For MnOx/Ceo2a sharp decay in activity . For MnOx/Ti02 several

and MnO,/MgA1204,

hours,

cantly

higher

The temperature exemplified reaction

by

in

Table

are

behavior

possibly

perature

Bulk Khodakow

case

7.

apparent

With

the

(Figure

8).

(Table

These

catalytic

levels

occurred

of the non-

6).

activity

activity

rise occurred

remained

rate for catalysts

activation

exception showed

in the

activity

to the

over

at a signifi-

value.

from a linear

MnO,/CeO2

due to a change

is lowered

the

in catalytic

decayed

transient

of the reaction

The

satisfactory.

of

only

the

the

correlation

are

coef-

in its rate temperature

rate-determining

catalyst

hydrogenation

of the rate data)

MnOx/A1203,A change

reduced at 673 K iS

for

regression

a clear

reaction

It is the

energies

to show

step as the temthis

type

of non-

behavior. manganese

oxides

[I53 has reported

to 673

K) while

K.

this

In

7.

was evaluated.

was observed.

a sharp

steady-state

573 K (as calculated

ficients

typical

in this

dependence

Figure

above

summarized

but

(>8-fold)

activity

behavior:

A or B types,

with time on stream. hydrated

with a = 0.05.

around

tion and He preactivation were

___

MnO

study

are

poor

that Mn02

has an activity he concludes

that

catalysts

for

iS completely of 4~10~~ lower

the

kmol/kg

metal

hydrogenation

inactive

for this

h (5x10-10

oxides

are

of

olifins.

reaction

kmol/m2/h)

qenerally

more

(473 K at 473 active

than

the

y-Al203 some

ones

exhibiting

shows

small

at fJ3

X [&xID-~

activity

not active Our

for ethylene

results

become

behavior

"critical

the the

MnOx/CeO2

profile

that

vior

might

The

cally recover

does

their step

the different

supports

inactive:

and anatase rI?,IR>;

shows

Ce$

is

influence

Our reaction

temperatures

are

dissociation

of hydrogen

can

which

the

in ethylene

lack

data

of the

defines on

the

series,

[ZO], but

the main function adsorption

of

of the

the

olefin

with

a temperature-activity

step

(Figure

8). This beha-

mobile

OH- at higher

in rate-determining of Mn

hydrogenation

cations

with

below.

not bring

about

catalytic

regain,

is reoxidized

markedly

oxide species.

reoxidation

or

significant

activity.

even

reason for this may be associated catalyst

are also

for

exception

by

initial

to

supports kmn)}mjh)

the H2 that

we

of a change

be caused

reoxidation

reoxidation

to activate

as discussed

temperatures,

TX,

although

is the only

is typical

also

The

at 623 K [16],

ur I.IxID-~~

step on pure metals

[21-251,

itself.

that

of the manganese temperature",

the ability

catalysts

states. activity

kmn)}kgjh

demonstrate

rate-determining

it is probably oxide

oxidation

hydrogenation

hydrogenation.

patently

the catalytic above

higher

a very

exceed,

changes

initial

with the reducible

and activated

with

hwer,

MnOx/TiO2, its

and the catalysts

rewires

catalytic

nature

a 573 K

activity.

of the support.

He, a new hydrogen

typi-

pretreatment

The

Once the may cause

the reaction

l/2

H2 + CP2 + OH- + H-

to occur sence

extensively.

of both

did not

properties The

the

and

same

anion

dissociation

sites.

behavior

unsdturdteb

with

as MnO,Ti02

helium

at

573

might

would

also

be enough

reducible

its easier

pre-

oxide,

reoxidation

for MnOx/CeO2.

chemical

bti_ytmte-s %ve

in the

occur

another

be due to

K removes

as W&-I ax

j-ites.,

of H2 may

The fact that CeO2,

[26]. Thus a 473 K reoxidation

pretreatment

cb?n;itiVIS?I_Y support

A heterolytic

catIon

show

(3)

water

and

leaves

coor-

man_mnrieJe h_y%mX*lb?s mb ni-e

: OH

HO ‘Mn/

(4)

HO' HO

'OH OH

+

'x'

This effect tic activity

is remarkable reported

aL1.26 ta%a>ysts H2 activated The effect

&Lay

in Table \n

as shown by the enhancement

on MnOx/Ti02

6. At higher

artivib

to

a

reaction

IeqE{

tkat

temperatures is


of the catalythe He-preactivtQ

tkat

of

samples. of ~20 on the reaction

performance

is also revealing.

On ZnO and

t&

31

Hydrated

Dehydrofed

Heierolytic

Reductive

H2 adsorption

0

02- (fIrsi H+ H-

.

0

FIGURE

9

Changes

row )

I)

Mn"+

@

M”(“-l)+

x

in a MnO, overlayer

H2 adsorption

C2H4

on a support

basal plane,

under the influence

of H20, H2 and C7H4

y-Al203

a small

amount

of H2D

deactivation

cI6,27]

metal

the presence

oxides

dinatively

of

unsaturated

bonds,

ethylene

a monolayer)

hydrogenation

(CUS)

and

is enough

activity.

to

partially

1281, or to even hydrolyze

be due

reduction

to a decrease

in the activity

in CUS

performance

after the helium

H2 at 473°K

that

occupy

followed

hours

MnO, to

supported

"normal"

on

due

enhancement

after preactivation

anatase

or hydrolysis The

supported

MnOx/Ce+, perature,

C2H4 with

of the

bonds

different

hydrogenation lower

has also

with

been

are

activities observed

this

catalyst

OH- groups

effects

for

MnO,/Ti02

activity the

permanent,

perhaps,

pretreatments complex.

either

with

The

by Denisova

the

metal

oxide

improve

as H20 and

after

is far

reveals

of

several

catalytic

less

than

a decrease of manganese

supported

of

the

et al. on Cr2D3/Al&

the

in CUS ions

MnOx.

on the catalytic

behavior of

its with

preactivation.

decays

oxidation

values

might

reduction

enhancement but

hydrogen

singular

intermediate

as in

MUx clusters.

did not

of tne helium

initial

is

of coor-

catalyst,

that may desorb

-or both- for the alumina

at

the

after the H20 treatment

pure He. This again,

and,

transition

less reducible

high

pretreatment

catalyst

of the Al-0-Mn

effects

for

$0

supported

the total amount

the carrier/transition

that

surface

the

a complete

is then understandable:

In contrast

performance

on the

the

fact

any beneficial

alumina

values.

to

The

can produce

CUS so as to minimize

For

[30].

to cause

reoxidize

of MnOx/Ce+

pretreatment

On

shown to affect

as in the case of CrO,/.SlD2 [29], stabilizing

The observed

vity

of

of H20 has been

sites

the case of MoOx/A12D3

(-2%

acti-

MnO,/Tifl2 and reduction

[31].

tem-

They also

32 reported that, decreases Most

if starting

certainly

endothermic,

the

but

reaction

These

with

types

of

OH- groups

473

can be adsorbed

though

might

be reproduced.

above

temperatures

catalysts,

using

a simple

oxides,

K is not

on the

sup-

thus decreasing

the

-notably

occur

of

groups

(Figure

either

form

of manganese

chains

would of

MnDx/Ti02

and

at 673 K and this would

model

A1203

not produce Mn

atoms

for the catalysts.

of Mn over the preferenor Cd+,

with

mononuclear

[32,33]

ClOSe

species,

resembling

its

but own

5).

-pyrolusite

cations

structural

a deposition

such as anatase,

most certainly

structure

9. The figure

which

at higher

the rate steadily

cannot

H2 activation

of water

the

mobile

and

activity

activity.

overlayer

the first type of regular in Figure

solids

that was used involved

This method

isomorphic

dehydration,

different

some

is lowered,

catalytic

be deeper

of OH- covered

oxide and hydroxide Upon

On

method

plane

packed anions. an

the

can be summarized

The impregnation basal

will

for a higher

ideas

of

the evolution

reduction

a reoxidation

be responsible

rather

reduction

performance.

Mn02/Ce02-

low-temperdture

involves

ports [29]. The

tial

from 673 K the temperature

and the original

or

coordinated

ramsdellite with

oxygen

chainsanions.

will

has been used to model the MnO, OVerlaYer,

shows the surface

under one set of conditions

lead

to

For simplicity, as shown

among the many

that may be possible. This simple

model

gen and further

least two adjacent (c) and reductive

[Mnn+]2(02-)2

offers

reactions,

a description following

Mn cations,

of the heterolytic

the Burwell

model

each one with an anion

dissociation

[34], with

vacancy

of hydro-

involvement

of at

both after unreductive

(d) conditions:

+ H2 + C2H4 +

+ [Mnn+C2H4][Mn n+H-]02+ [Mnnt]2(02-)2

The formation

OH- +

(5)

+ C2H6

of a hydrolyzed

support

manganese

oxide

overlayer

or the reduction

of

the metal + [Mn (n-2)+]DH-

[Mn"+H-](O*-)

follows

directly

from the model.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This

work

was

Industry-University the Center

R&D

by

Cooperative

for Catalytic

ISS experiments Central

supported

were

Department,

Science

a

National

Research

Science

Program

Foundation

and by the

grant

Industrial

from Sponsors

the of

and Technology.

performed Wilmington,

by

Dr.

D.G.

Delaware.

Swartzfager G.C.A.

Schuit

of the

DuPont

contributed

Company, generously

33 through

many helpful discussions.

REFERENCES 1 2 3

a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 :: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

33 34 35

B.C. Gates, J.R. Katzer and G.C.A. Schuit, "Chemistry of Catalytic Processes", pp. 325-390, McGraw-Hill, 1979. G.C.A. Schuit, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 12, Suppl. 2 (1977) 43. PhD Dissertation, Univ. of Delaware, Dissertation Abstracts M.A. Baltanas, International 43(7) (1983) 2272-B. M.A. Baltanas, A.B. Stiles and J.R. Katzer, Applied Catal., in press. Ibid., Applied Catal., in press. (a) Ibid., J. Catal. 88 (1984) 362; (b) Ibid., J. Catal. 88 (19a4) 516. M.A. Baltanas, S. OeCanio, J.R. Katzer and C. Oybowski, Acta Chimica Hungarica, lla(4) (1985) -285. M.A. Baltanas, A.B. Stiles and J.R. Katzer, Acta Chimica Hungarica, accepted for publication. E.F. Kaelbe, "Handbook of X-rays", Chapter 17, McGraw Hill, New York,.l966. M.A. Wheeler, Anal. Chem. 47(l) (1975) 146. G.C. Nelson, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 55(2) (1976) 289. F.A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, "Advanced Inorganic Chemistry", 3rd. ed., Wiley, New York, 1972. H. Schaefer and E. Buchler, Z. Natuurforsch 22a (1967) 2117. G.C.A. Schuit, private communication. Yu S. Khodakov, V.V. Zasypkin, N.I. Galan-Sanches and Kh.M. Minachev., Bull. of the Acad. of Sci. of USSR 26(7) (1977) 1550. S.G. Hindin and S.W. Welle, Adv. in Catal. 10 (195B) 70. D.L. Harrison, D. Nicholls and H. Steiner, J. Catal. 7 (1967) 350. R. Rukwei Kyi, PhD Dissertation, Columbia University, 1966. Kh. M. Minachev, Yu S. Khodakov, and V.S. Nakhshunov, J. Catal. 49 (1977) 207. J. Horiuti and K. Miyahara, 4th Int. Congr. Catal., Moscov (196B), Preprint 43. D.A. Dowden, N. Mackenzie and B.M.W. Trapnell, Proc. Roy. Sot., A237 (1956) 245. O.V. Krilov, "Catalysis by Nonmetals", Academic Press, New York, 1970. K. Tanaka and T. Okuhara, J. Catal. 65 (1980) 1. (a) R.P. Eischens, W.A. Pliskin and M.J.D. Low, J. Catal. 1 (1962) 180; (b) R.J. Kokes, Catal. Rev. 6 (1972) 1. P.P.M.M. Wittgen, C. Groeneveld, J.H.G.C. Jansenns, M.L.J.A. Wetzels and G.C.A. Schuit, J. Catal. 59 (1979) 168. (a) M. Breysse, M. Guenin, B. Claudel, H. Laetrille and J. Vernon, J. Catal. 28 (1973) 54; (b) Ibid. 27 (1972) 275. J.F. Woodman and H.S. Taylor, J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 62 (1940) 1393. J. Engelhardt, J. Catal. 62 (1980) 243. G.C.A. Schuit and N.H. deBoer, Rec. Trav. Chim. 70 (1951) 1076. T. Yamaguchi, N. Ikeda, H. Hattori, K. Tanabe, J. Catal. 67 (1981) 324. T.A. Denisova, K.P. Lavrovkii and A.L. Rozental, Neftekhimiya 8 (1968) 326. P.W. Selwood, T.E. Moore, M. Ellis and K. Wethington, J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 71 (1949) 693. R.B. Spooner and P.W. Selwood, J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 71 (1949) 2184. R.L. Burwell Jr. and C.J. Loner, Proc. 3rd. Int. Congr. Catal., hsterdam, 804 (1964). "Powder Diffraction File, Inorganic Compounds", J.C.P.D.S. International Center for Diffraction Data (1977). "Lange"s Handbook of Chemistry", 12th. ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1979. W.F. Nye, S.B. Levin and H.H. Kedesky, Power Sources Conf. Proc. 13 (1959) 125.