Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid lesions

Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid lesions

Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (2012) 24, 63–70 Cairo University Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute www.nci.cu.adu...

1012KB Sizes 9 Downloads 191 Views

Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (2012) 24, 63–70

Cairo University

Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute www.nci.cu.adu.eg www.sciencedirect.com

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in thyroid lesions E.A. Sinna, N. Ezzat

*

The Department of Pathology, Cytopathology Unit, NCI, Cairo University, Egypt Received 16 October 2011; accepted 23 January 2012 Available online 25 February 2012

KEYWORDS FNAC; Thyroid gland lesions; Accuracy

Abstract Purpose: Evaluation of accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of different thyroid lesions. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study of 296 diagnosed cases of thyroid nodules referred to cytology unit, pathology department, NCI, who underwent FNAC for diagnosis. The results were categorized according to the recent Bethesda classification into: insufficient for diagnosis, benign, atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant sampling. The final histologic diagnosis and/or clinico-radiologic follow-up assessment for non-neoplastic lesions were considered the gold standard. Results: The study included 296 cases presented with thyroid nodules who underwent diagnostic thyroid FNAC. Female to male ratio was 5.2:1, and the median age was 44 years. Ninety-eight cases (33.1%) were diagnosed as benign, 40 cases (13.5%) as follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 49 cases (16.5%) as follicular neoplasm, 30 cases (10.1%) as suspicious for malignancy, 58 cases (19.5%) as malignant, and 21 cases (7.1%) as unsatisfactory. Nodular hyperplasia represented the majority of benign cases (89.8%), while papillary carcinoma was the most frequent malignant lesion (72.4%). Cytologic diagnoses were compared with their corresponding final histologic ones. FNAC achieved a sensitivity of 92.8, a specificity of 94.2%, a positive predictive value of 94.9%, a negative predictive value of 91.8%, a false positive rate of 7.2%, a false negative rate of 5.8%, and a total accuracy of 93.6%. Conclusion: FNA cytology is a sensitive, specific, and accurate initial diagnostic test for the evaluation of patients with thyroid swellings. ª 2012 National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

* Corresponding authors. Tel.: +20 233052404/1221810284. E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Ezzat). Peer review under responsibility of the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.

Production and hosting by Elsevier

Introduction Thyroid nodules are common clinical findings and have a reported prevalence of 4–7% of adult population. However, fewer than 5% of adult thyroid nodules are malignant, and the vast majority is non-neoplastic lesions or benign neoplasms. It is preferred to operate only on those patients with suspicion

1110-0362 ª 2012 National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnci.2012.01.001

64 of cancer, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery and possible injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, hypoparathyroidism, and thyroid hormone dependence in patients with benign thyroid nodules. However, the distinction of these benign lesions from malignant nodules cannot be based reliably on the clinical presentation alone [1]. FNAC of the thyroid gland is now a well-established, firstline diagnostic test for the evaluation of diffuse thyroid lesions as well as of thyroid nodules with the main purpose of confirming benign lesions and thereby, reducing unnecessary surgery [2]. Different imaging techniques are now used for diagnosis of thyroid nodules like radionucleotide scanning, high-resolution ultrasonography, etc. However, FNAC is still regarded as the single most accurate and cost-effective procedure, particularly if ultrasound is used as a guide for better sample collection, especially for cystic lesions [3]. Published data suggest that FNA has an overall accuracy rate around 95% in the detection of thyroid malignancy [4]. Nevertheless, like any other test, FNAC has its limitations and diagnostic pitfalls. These limitations include false negative and false positive results and a proportion of FNA results that are not obviously benign or malignant and fall into the indeterminate or suspicious group [5]. The reported pitfalls are those related to specimen adequacy, sampling techniques, the skill of the physician performing the aspiration, the experience of the pathologist interpreting the aspirate and the overlapping cytological features between some benign and malignant thyroid lesions [6].

E.A. Sinna, N. Ezzat slide smears were made for each case and immediately fixed in 95% ethyl alcohol for about 30 min. All the slides (aspirated in our unit and received as US guided material) were stained with Papanicolaou stain. Diagnosis of cytological smears was done according to standard criteria defined by various authors [2]. We categorized our results into insufficient for diagnosis, benign, atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant sampling according to the recent Bethesda classification [8]. Aspirates with insufficient cellularity or poor quality smear due to delayed or inadequate fixation were considered ‘‘unsatisfactory’’. This group also included the aspirates consisting only of cyst fluid. FNAC results were then compared with the definitive histological diagnosis which was considered the gold standard. Cases with cytohistological disparity were selected and reevaluated for the detection of possible cause. Some patients with benign diagnoses who did not underwent surgery were followed up with repeated clinico-radiologic assessment, and nodules showed significant growth, or cases showed recent clinical features of progression (hoarseness of voice, pressure symptoms) underwent a repeat FNAC. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FNAC in diagnosing thyroid lesions were calculated according to the following equation:

True positive ðTPÞ True positive ðTPÞ þ False negative ðFNÞ True negative ðTNÞ Specificity ðTrue negative rateÞ ¼ True negative ðTNÞ þ False positive ðFPÞ True positive ðTPÞ Positive predictive value ðPPVÞ ¼ True positive ðTPÞ þ False positive ðFPÞ True negative ðTNÞ Negative predictive value ðNPVÞ ¼ True negative ðTNÞ þ False negative ðFNÞ False positive ðFPÞ False positive rate ðFPRÞ ¼ False positive ðFPÞ þ True negative ðTNÞ False negative ðFNÞ False negative rate ðFNRÞ ¼ False negative ðFNÞ þ True positive ðTNÞ True positive ðTPÞ þ True negative ðTNÞ Total accuracy ¼ Total number of cases Sensitivity ðTrue positive rateÞ ¼

Our aim was: (1) to demonstrate the effectiveness of FNAC in the diagnosis of different thyroid lesions, (2) to highlight probable causes of error in the cases showing discrepancy between cytological and histological diagnoses.

Since it was difficult to include unsatisfactory cases as well as follicular lesions of undetermined significance under any benign or malignant cytologic categories, these cases were excluded from the calculation. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.

Patients and methods Results This is a retrospective study of 296 diagnosed cases of thyroid nodules referred to cytology unit, pathology department, NCI, in the period between January 2005 and December 2010. The cases notes were retrieved and information about the age, sex, ultrasound findings, cytological and histological diagnoses was reviewed. Thyroid swellings were aspirated using (23/24) gauge disposable needles using standard procedures [7]. The aspirated contents of the needle were expelled onto glass slides. Four

We included 296 cases, 48 cases (16.2%) were males and 248 cases (83.8%) were females, with female to male ratio of 5.2:1. The age ranged from 14 to 77 years, with a median age of 44 years. FNAC results were interpreted as benign in 98 cases (33.1%), follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 40 cases (13.5%), follicular neoplasm in 49 cases (16.5%) (Fig. 5), suspicious in 30 cases (10.1%), malignant in 58 cases

FNAC of thyroid gland lesions

65

Table 1 Distribution of cases according to cytologic diagnosis. Cytologic diagnosis

No.

Percentage

Benign Follicular lesion of US Follicular neoplasm Suspicious of malignancy Malignant Unsatisfactory Total

98 40 49 30 58 21 296

33.1 13.5 16.5 10.1 19.5 7.1 100

(19.5%), and unsatisfactory in 21 cases (7.1%) (Table 1). The benign diagnoses included 88 cases (89.8%) of nodular colloid goiter, and 10 cases (10.2%) of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. The malignant diagnoses were 42 cases (72.4%) of papillary carcinoma ( Figs. 1–4), 6 cases (10.3%) of medullary carcinoma (Fig. 6), and 10 cases (17.2%) of anaplastic carcinoma.

Figure 3 A case of papillary carcinoma with squamous metaplastic cells (right), and its histopathologic counterpart (left), showing the same squamous metaplastic cells, together with papillary carcinoma cells (Pap. ·400).

Figure 1 A case of papillary carcinoma showing characteristic papillary configuration (top left) (Pap. ·100). The nuclei show ground glass chromatin, intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions (thin arrow), and characteristic clefts (thick arrow) (Pap. ·400).

Figure 4 A case of papillary carcinoma showing multinucleated tumor giant cell beside a syncytial arrangement of tumor cells with indistinct cell borders and ground glass nuclei (Pap. ·400).

Figure 2 A case of papillary carcinoma featuring syncytial arrangement of cells with prominent nuclear grooves (Pap. ·400).

Figure 5 A case of follicular neoplasm showing atypical follicular cells with high N/C ratio and nuclear pleomorphism, arranged in three dimensional cluster with focal attempt at acinar arrangement (arrow) (Pap. ·400).

66

Figure 6 A case of medullary carcinoma showing scattered separate epithelial cells having abundant cytoplasm, and eccentric nuclei (plasmacytoid cells) (Pap. ·400).

The results of FNAC were compared with their corresponding histopathological diagnoses in all cases of follicular lesion of undetermined significance, cases of follicular neoplasm, suspicious and malignant cases, and some benign diagnosed cases upon cytopathologist request in some cases and upon surgeon’s recommendation for patient’s symptoms relieve in others. Of the 49 colloid nodular cases who underwent surgical intervention, 42 cases (85.7%) were diagnosed as nodular goiter, six cases (12.2%) as follicular adenoma, and one case (2%) as carcinoma. The remaining 39 cases who did not undergo surgery and followed clinically and radiologically for 2 years,

E.A. Sinna, N. Ezzat showed no significant increase in size, ultrasonographic changes, or pressure symptoms. Since the diagnosis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is not documented by pathologic examination, 9/10 cases (90%) included in the present work were confirmed by correlation with clinical, serological, and follow up radiological studies, the only case (10%) of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis that underwent surgical intervention showed a smear with atypical lymphoid cells, thus biopsy was requested. In our study, 40 out of 296 (13.5%) cases were diagnosed as FLUS, pathologic diagnosis was follicular adenoma in 31 out of 40 cases (77.5%), and nodular goiter in nine cases (22.5%). Four cases (8.2%) of follicular neoplasm were diagnosed as colloid goiter, 14 cases (28.6%) as follicular carcinoma, 29 cases (59.2%) as follicular adenoma, and two cases (4.1%) as follicular variant of papillary carcinoma. Of the included 30 cases suspicious for papillary carcinoma, 29 cases (96.7%) were confirmed after resection, while the remaining case (3.3%) was proved to be nodular goiter. Forty out of 42 cases (95.2%) of papillary thyroid carcinoma were confirmed histologically, while two cases (4.8%) were diagnosed as papillary hyperplasia. The pathologic diagnosis of all included cases of medullary carcinoma was concordant with the cytologic one (100%) (immunocytochemical reaction of one included case of medullary carcinoma to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), chromogranin, and calcitonin was done and showed positive reaction to the three markers Fig. 7). Of the included 10 cases of anaplastic carcinoma, two (20%) were early resectable, thus underwent surgical resection, one (10%) showed plasmacytoid cells, so biopsy was requested for confirmation and proved to be medullary carcinoma, the

Figure 7 A case of medullary carcinoma proved by positive immunocytochemical reaction to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), chromogranin, and calcitonin (Pap. ·400).

FNAC of thyroid gland lesions Table 2

67

Cytologic diagnosis of included cases, and the corresponding pathologic results.

Cytologic diagnosis

No

Pathologic diagnosis

No.

Remark

Benign

50

Nodular goiter

49

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis Follicular lesion of US

1 40

Follicular neoplasm

49

Suspicious

30

Malignant

51

Papillary carcinoma

42

Benign Neoplastic Colloid goiter Follicular neoplasm (adenoma except 1 case papillary carcinoma) NHL Follicular adenoma Nodular goiter Follicular adenoma Follicular carcinoma Nodular goiter Papillary carcinoma (follicular variant) Malignant Benign Malignant Benign Papillary carcinoma Nodular goiter Medullary carcinoma Anaplastic carcinoma Medullary carcinoma

42 8 42 7 1 31 9 29 14 4 2 29 1 49 2 40 2 6 2 1

TN FN TN FN FN TP FP TP TP FP TP TP FP TP FP TP FP TP TP TP

Medullary carcinoma Anaplastic carcinoma

Table 3

6 3

Relations between cytologic and final diagnosis.

Cytologic diagnosis

Final diagnosis Benign

Neoplastic

Benign Follicular neoplasm Suspicious and malignant Total

90 (TN) 4 (FP) 3 (FP) 97

8 (FN) 45 (TP) 85 (TP) 138

Total

98 49 88 235

remaining seven cases (70%) had an advanced stage of cancer and surgical resection was enabled, thus final diagnosis was based on FNAC, in correlation with clinical and radiological (Table 2). Of the included 98 cases cytologically diagnosed as benign (non-neoplastic), 90 cases (91.8%) were proved to be non-neoplastic (by histopathology and clinico-radiologic follow-up), and eight cases (8.2%) were diagnosed as neoplastic by histopathology (follicular adenoma and papillary carcinoma). Forty-five out of 49 (91.8%) cases of follicular neoplasm were neoplastic, and four cases (8.2%) were benign by histopathology (non-neoplastic). Among the included 88 malignant and suspicious cases, 85 cases (96.6%) were malignant, while only three cases (3.4%) were proved to be benign by histopathology. Thus, FNAC achieved a sensitivity of 92.8%, specificity of 94.2%, positive predictive value of 94.9%, negative predictive value of 91.8%, and a total accuracy of 93.6% (Table 3).

Discussion Fine needle aspiration cytology is regarded as the gold standard initial investigation in the diagnosis of thyroid swellings. The technique is safe, simple and quick with a low complication rate. Several other tests, such as high resolution ultrasonography, radioisotope scanning and others have been used for evaluation of thyroid swellings before proceeding to thyroid surgery. Studies have demonstrated that among all these

diagnostic modalities, FNAC is the most accurate, cost effective screening test for rapid diagnosis of thyroid swellings [9]. Fine-needle aspiration cytology has greatly improved the clinical management of thyroid nodules. However, FNA has inherent limitations related not only to inadequate sampling but also, most importantly, to its inability to distinguish between benign and malignant follicular lesions in the absence of nuclear features of papillary carcinoma. The indeterminate diagnosis of follicular neoplasm encompasses a number of heterogeneous thyroid lesions including cellular adenomatoid nodule, follicular adenoma, and follicular carcinoma [10]. Additionally, the interpretation of follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC) in cytology may be difficult when prominent classic nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma are absent. In such cases, a preoperative diagnosis of ‘‘follicular lesion suggestive of papillary carcinoma’’ results in conservative surgical assessment until a definitive diagnosis can determine the appropriate treatment [11]. Another limitation of FNAC is the presence of false negative and positive results particularly with small tumors and when there is associated degenerative or inflammatory change in adjacent thyroid tissue. In addition, there is a group of lesions which overlap benign and malignant features. For instance, the distinction between a cellular colloid goiter and a follicular neoplasm may be impossible [12]. As reported in other literatures, age and gender were associated factors of thyroid lesions [13]. In present study, there was a female predominance giving a female-to-male ratio of 5.2:1. The age of patients ranged from 14 to77 years, with median of 44 years, being slightly higher in neoplastic lesions (45 years) than in non-neoplastic lesions (40 years). As in other literature, the benign cases represented the majority of cases (33.1%). The incidence of specific histology in the benign and malignant group showed no difference from other reports [13]. Nodular hyperplasia constituted the majority of benign lesions (89.8%). Papillary carcinoma was the most frequent malignant lesion, with an incidence of

68 (72.4%), while anaplastic (17.2%) and medullary carcinomas (10.3%) were the second and third most common malignant lesions, respectively. Every thyroid FNA must be evaluated for adequacy. Inadequate samples were reported as ‘‘nondiagnostic’’ or ‘‘unsatisfactory’’. This category applies to specimens that were unsatisfactory owing to obscuring blood, overly thick smears, air drying of alcohol-fixed smears, or an inadequate number of follicular cells. For a thyroid FNA specimen to be satisfactory for evaluation, at least six groups of benign follicular cells are required, each group composed of at least 10 cells. Published data suggest inadequate sample range between 2% and 20% [14]. In our study the inadequate sample rate was 7.1%. In our series, analysis of data revealed a sensitivity of 92.8% and a specificity of 94.2%, which was translated into a diagnostic accuracy of 93.6%, a PPV of 94.9%, and a NPV of 91.8%. Our results were comparable with published data where FNAC of thyroid is reported to have a sensitivity ranges from 65% to 98%, a specificity of 72% to 100%, a positive predictive value of 34% to 100%, and a negative predictive value of 83% to 100% [15]. The determinant factor for such a wide range of difference may be due to differences in number of cases, the included diagnostic categories, and how the cytopathologists classify ‘suspicious’, FLUS, as well as false positive and negative samples. Some authors include follicular lesion in the neoplastic group, whereas others exclude them from the calculations [16]. The incidence of FLUS cases in our study was 13.5%, which is higher than the reported figure of 3–6% in literature [17]. This could be explained by the subjective nature of the cytomorphologic diagnostic features of this category between different cytopathologists interpreting the cases in our unit where we are recently introducing the Bethesda system. The overall accuracy of cytologic diagnosis in our study was 93.6% which agrees more or less with published data that approach 95% in the differentiation of benign from malignant nodules of the thyroid gland [4]. However, the interpretation errors in this study can be reduced by obtaining aspirates from different portions of the lesion, using ultrasound- guided FNA procedure, and reviewing slides by more than one cytopathologist [18]. The false negative rate (FNR) is defined as the percentage of patients with benign cytology in whom malignant lesions are later confirmed on thyroidectomy. The false negative FNAC results may occur because of sampling error, coexistence of benign and malignant lesions, or cytomorphologic overlap between benign and low grade malignant tumors. This is of great concern because it indicates the potential to miss malignant lesion [19]. However, it is difficult to calculate the true false negative rate because only a small percentage (approximately 10%) of patients with benign cytological findings proceed to surgery. FNR ranged from 1% to 16% in different series [20]. In our series FNR was 5.8%, which agrees with that reported in literature. There were six out of 49 cases (12.2%) of nodular goiter proved to be follicular adenoma, and one case (2%) as follicular carcinoma. There was also one out of 10 cases (10%) of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis proved histopathologically to be NHL. On review, smears from the seven cases of colloid goiter with false negative cytologic diagnosis showed moderate cellularity with small clumps of thyroid follicular cells arranged in

E.A. Sinna, N. Ezzat poorly cohesive groups with some colloid in background suggesting the diagnosis of nodular colloid goiter. Aspiration in these cases was probably done from a hyperplastic adenomatous nodule. In general, cytological differentiation between follicular neoplasm and adenomatous goiter is not confusing, although sometimes seems very difficult [21]. As a general rule, smears from adenomatous nodule show less cells and more colloid than those from follicular neoplasm. In some rare occasions, confusing cellular smears are detected in nonneoplastic adenomatous nodules. In such rare cases, the presence of dispersed rather than tightly cohesive follicular cells is in favor of non-neoplastic adenomatous nodule. Also, thyroid scintigram may solve this problem, where neoplastic nodules appear as cold nodules [22]. An associated neoplastic lesion, not rarely encountered in cases of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and that is not properly sampled by FNA, could explain missing of a lymphomatous focus in some cases of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and resulted in increasing the incidence of false negative diagnosis of NHL. Thus, if lymphoma is suspected, demonstration of monoclonality by immunostaining, and flow cytometric studies performed on the aspirate may help in determining a definitive diagnosis without having to restore to surgery [23]. The false positive rate (FPR) indicates that a patient with malignant FNAC result was found on histological examination to have benign lesion. In our series the FPR was 7.2% which agrees with other series that ranged from 0% to 8% [18]. We reported three cases (3.1%) as malignant and suspicious for carcinoma, and four cases (4.1%) of follicular neoplasm that proved to be non-neoplastic on histologic correlation. The four cases of follicular neoplasm showed clusters of follicular cells arranged in clumps with scanty colloid. The histology though, showed features of a nodular colloid goiter. Aspiration was probably done from the hypercellular areas of colloid nodules which led to over diagnosis. As already discussed, cytological distinction between these two conditions is often difficult. A possible remedy is multiple aspirations from different parts of the swelling that could demonstrate hypocellular, polymorphic, and colloid-rich areas. Demonstration of monolayered sheets of epithelial cells representing macrofollicles and degenerative changes would suggest the possibility of non-neoplastic lesions [24]. The cytological smears of two cases wrongly diagnosed as papillary carcinoma were moderately cellular showing numerous macrophages, thick colloid, cohesive clumps and sheets of follicular cells arranged in vague papillary patterns with nuclear overlapping and crowding. Few cells contained moderate amount of blue cytoplasm and round nucleus with pale open chromatin. Intranuclear inclusions were demonstrated in few cells. The histology showed features consistent with those of a nodular colloid goiter. Misinterpretation of partly degenerated non-neoplastic follicular cells, focal papillary architecture, and intranuclear inclusions were probably the causes of error in these cases. Multiple samples collected from different parts of the lesion could help in proper diagnosis. For cytodiagnosis of papillary thyroid cancer, the most important features suggested are intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions, dense metaplastic cytoplasm, and papillary structures with distinct anatomical border. These features can lead to a decrease in the wrong cytologic diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma [25].

FNAC of thyroid gland lesions Many thyroid cancers, especially papillary thyroid carcinoma, can be diagnosed with certainty by FNA. However, the nuclear and architectural changes of some PTCs are subtle and focal. This is particularly true for the follicular variant of PTC, which can be difficult to distinguish from a benign follicular nodule. Other PTCs may be incompletely sampled and yield only a small number of abnormal cells [26]. If only 1 or 2 characteristic features of PTC are present, or if they are only focal and not widespread throughout the follicular cell population, a malignant diagnosis cannot be made with certainty. Such cases are best classified as ‘‘suspicious for malignancy’’. Nodules called suspicious for papillary carcinoma are resected by lobectomy or thyroidectomy. Most prove to be papillary carcinomas, and the rest are usually follicular adenomas [27,28]. The same general principle applies to other thyroid malignancies like medullary carcinoma and lymphoma, but these are encountered less frequently than PTC. Ancillary techniques (immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry) in borderline cases is usually more helpful with medullary carcinoma and lymphoma than with PTC [29]. In our study, there were 30 cases reported as suspicious for papillary carcinoma, as the nuclear morphologic features were only focal in some cases, while in others, not all the features were seen. Twenty-nine out of 30 cases (96.7%) were proved after pathologic examination, while only one case (3.3%) was nodular goiter. Two cases of a follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPTC) were wrongly interpreted as follicular neoplasm. The smears had shown numerous follicular cells arranged in clusters, often with syncytial cell aggregates. There was prominent nuclear crowding and overlapping without any colloid. The presence of follicular structures led to misinterpretation. A possible way to reduce such error is to do aspirations from different parts which could reveal the typical nuclear features of papillary carcinoma [30]. A group of authors reported that papillary nuclear features in more than 20 cells would have a greater risk of occurrence of papillary carcinoma, although these findings may also lead to over interpretation [31]. The smears from one case of anaplastic carcinoma showed numerous cells with plasmacytoid features, thus biopsy was requested and proved to be medullary carcinoma. Generally, medullary carcinoma of giant cell type may appear cytologically identical to anaplastic carcinoma. Application of immunostaining for calcitonin, or electronmicroscopy can solve the problem [32]. In conclusion, the results of our study are comparable with the current published data and demonstrate that FNA cytology is a sensitive, specific, and accurate initial diagnostic test for evaluation of patients with thyroid swellings. Cytodiagnostic errors of some cases with overlapping cytological features can be avoided by paying attention to the possible pitfalls. The suspicious results can be resolved by diagnostic surgical resection. A benign FNAC diagnosis should be viewed with caution as false negative results do occur and these patients should be followed up clinico-radiologically for any progression that will require repeated FNAC and/or surgery.

References [1] Roman SA. Endocrine tumors. Evaluation of thyroid nodule. Curr Opin Oncol 2003;15:66–70.

69 [2] Orell SR. In: Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN, Whitakar D, editors. Manual and atlas of fine needle aspiration cytology. New Delhi: Churchill-Livingstone; 2005. p. 125–64. [3] Amrikachi M, Ramzy I, Rubenfeld S, Wheeler TM. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration of thyroid: a review of 6226 cases and correlation with surgical and clinical outcome. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:484–8. [4] Mundasad B, Mcallister I, Carson J, Pyper P. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of thyroid swellings. Internet J Endocrinol 2006. Available from: http:// www.Ispub.com. [5] Galera-Davidson H. Diagnostic problems in thyroid fine needle aspirations. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:422–8. [6] Baloch ZW, Sack MJ, Yu GH, Livolsi VA, Gupta PK. Fine needle aspiration of thyroid an institutional experience. Thyroid 1998;8:565–9. [7] Smit TJ, Safali H, Foster EA, Reinhold RB. Accuracy and costeffectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg 1985;149:540–55. [8] Cibas ES, Ali EZ. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 2009;19(11):1159–65. [9] Caruso P, Muzzaferri EL. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the management of thyroid nodules. Endocrinology 1991;1:194–202. [10] Saggiorato E, De PR, Volante M. Characterization of thyroid ‘follicular neoplasms’ in fine-needle aspiration cytological specimens using a panel of immunohistochemical markers: a proposal for clinical application. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005;12:305–17. [11] Rossi ED, Raffaelli M, Minimo C. Immunocytochemical evaluation of thyroid neoplasms on thin-layer smears from fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cancer 2005;105:87–95. [12] Hall TL, Layfield LJ, Philippe A, Rosenthal DL. Source of diagnostic error in the fine needle aspiration of the thyroid. Cancer 1989;63:718–25. [13] Gharib H. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: advantages, limitations and effects. Mayo Clin Proc 1994;69:44–9. [14] Burch HB, Burman KP, Reed HL, Buckner L, Raber T, Owenbey JL. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: determinants of insufficiency rate and malignancy yield at thyroidectomy. Acta Cytol 1996;40:1176–83. [15] Cap J, Ryska A, Rehorkova P, Hovorkova E. Sensitivity and specificity of the fine needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: clinical point of view. Clin Endocrinol 1999;51(4):509–15. [16] Jogai S, Al Jassar A, Temmim L, Dey P, Adesina AO, Amanguno HG. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid: a cytohistologic study with evaluation of discordant cases. Acta Cytol 2005;49:483–8. [17] Cibas E, Alis S. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;132:658–65. [18] Bartolazzi A, Gasbarri A, Papotti M. Application of an immunodiagnostic method for improving preoperative diagnosis of nodular thyroid lesions. Lancet 2001;357:1644–50. [19] Kantasueb SA, Sukpan KO, Mahanupab PO. The study of thyroid lesions and the correlation between histological and cytological findings. Chiang Mai Med J 2010;49(3):105–10. [20] Nggada HA, Musa AB, Gali BM, Khalil MI. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodule (s): a Nigerian tertiary hospital experience. Internet J Pathol 2006. Available from: www.Ispub.com/ostia/index.Php/ijpa. [21] Atkinson B, Ernest CS, Livolsi V. Cytologic diagnosis of follicular tumours of the thyroid. Diagn Cytopathol 1986;2:1–5. [22] Miguel A Sanchez, Rosalyn E Stahl. The thyroid, parathyroid, and neck masses other than lymph nodes. In: Leopold G Koss, Myron R Melamed, editors. Koss’ diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic basis. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1148.

70 [23] MacDonald L, Yazdi HM. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Sources of diagnostic error. Acta Cytol 1999;43(3):400–6. [24] Suen KC. How does one separate cellular follicular lesions of the thyroid by fine needle aspiration biopsy? Diagn Cytopathol 1988;4:78–81. [25] Miller TR, Bottles K, Holly EA. A step-wise logistic regression analysis of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Acta Cytol 1986;30:285–93. [26] Chung D, Ghossein RA, Lin O. Macrofollicular variant of papillary carcinoma: a potential thyroid FNA pitfall 2007;35:560–4. [27] Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer 2007;111:306–15. [28] Renshaw A. Focal features of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in fine-needle aspiration material are strongly associated with

E.A. Sinna, N. Ezzat

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

papillary carcinoma at resection. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:208–10. Smit TJ, Safali H, Foster EA, Reinhold RB. Accuracy and costeffectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg 1985;149:540–5. Renshaw AA. Focal features of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in fine needle aspiration material are strongly associated with papillary carcinoma at resection. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118:208–10. Goldstein RE, Netterville JL, Burkey B, Johnson JE. Implications of follicular neoplasms, atypia and lesions suspicious for malignancy diagnosed by fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. Am J Surg 2002;235:656–64. Caraway NP, Sniege N, Samaan. Diagnostic pitfalls in thyroid fine needle aspiration: a review of 394 cases. Diagn cytopathol 1993;9:345–50.