JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019
ª 2019 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER
STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER
Diastolic Stress Test Invasive and Noninvasive Testing Jong-Won Ha, MD, PHD,a Oyvind S. Andersen, MD,b Otto A. Smiseth, MD, PHDb
ABSTRACT Diastolic dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Around 50% of cases of heart failure, the hemodynamic correlate of which is increased left ventricular filling pressure, are caused by diastolic dysfunction in the setting of apparently normal systolic function. Due to its high prevalence, diastolic dysfunction is often recognized as an incidental finding. Many patients have Doppler echocardiographic evidence of impaired diastolic function but do not have any symptoms of heart failure at rest. In many of these patients, symptoms of diastolic dysfunction occur only during exercise, as left ventricular filling pressure is normal at rest, but increases with exercise. This implies that filling pressures should also be measured during exercise. The diastolic stress test refers to the evaluation of diastolic function, either invasively or noninvasively, during exercise. This review focuses on the clinical need for diastolic stress testing, both invasively and noninvasively. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2019;-:-–-) © 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
I
t has become increasingly evident that abnor-
may have entirely normal diastolic hemodynamics
malities of diastolic function play a major role
assessed in the resting state, and in these patients,
in precipitating heart failure and determining
filling pressures must be measured also during exer-
prognosis (1–4). Primary diastolic dysfunction is the
cise. Diastolic dysfunction can be graded using echo-
cause of up to 50% of cases of heart failure, the hemo-
cardiography. In patients with grade I diastolic
dynamic correlate of which is increased filling pres-
dysfunction, LV filling pressure at rest is normal.
sures.
this
However, in patients with a similar grade of diastolic
abnormality is often recognized as an incidental
dysfunction at rest, there can be a spectrum of alter-
finding. Many elderly subjects and patients with hy-
ations in diastolic function during exercise (Figure 1).
pertension or left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy have
Therefore, exercise could unmask diastolic abnormal-
Doppler echocardiographic evidence of impaired dia-
ities not evident under rest conditions. Despite this,
stolic function but do not have any symptoms of heart
the majority of measures used to characterize the
failure at rest. In many of these patients, symptoms of
severity of heart failure and prognosis are obtained
diastolic dysfunction occur only during exercise. In
at rest.
However,
because
of
its
ubiquity,
these patients, LV filling pressure can be normal at
Exertional dyspnea is among the most common
rest, but it increases with exercise, as they are unable
presenting symptoms in our routine practice. How-
to increase cardiac output without increasing filling
ever, the mechanisms responsible for dyspnea may
pressure. Thus, patients with significant heart disease
vary in different conditions. Although cardiac or
From the aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and the bDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Dr. Ha was supported by the Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Ministry of Science and Information Communication Technology (2016M3A9E9941746). Dr. Andersen was funded by South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (project 2014068). Dr. Smiseth has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Manuscript received September 4, 2018; revised manuscript received January 16, 2019, accepted January 16, 2019.
ISSN 1936-878X/$36.00
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.037
2
Ha et al.
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019 - 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
ABBREVIATIONS
pulmonary diseases are major causes of
etiology of dyspnea and thus LV filling parameters are
AND ACRONYMS
pathologic dyspnea, other systemic condi-
often overlooked. More importantly, patients who
tions, such as anemia, obesity, and neuro-
have exertional dyspnea that cannot be explained by
muscular diseases, should also be suspected.
the variables of LV systolic and diastolic functions at
By accurately identifying the correct cause of
rest would have steep LV pressure-volume relations
dyspnea in a patient, the appropriate treat-
in diastole during exercise compared with those who
ment can be implemented. A comprehensive
have no symptoms of exertional dyspnea despite
history, physical examination, and basic
similar LV diastolic functions at rest. If this is true,
laboratory tests are important in the initial
exercise hemodynamic responses, rather than evalu-
assessment; however, the diagnosis may
ation of diastolic function at rest alone, would pro-
depend on more specialized testing. Cardiac
vide
causes of dyspnea include right, left, or
information about these patients. Therefore, for pa-
biventricular heart failure with systolic dysfunction;
tients who report severe exertional symptoms, it may
coronary artery disease; recent or remote myocardial
be desirable to measure the hemodynamic response
infarction; hypertension with LV hypertrophy; car-
to exercise to ensure that these symptoms are due to
diomyopathy; valvular dysfunction; pericardial dis-
circulatory dysfunction.
eases; arrhythmia; and congenital heart disease. In
INVASIVE DIASTOLIC STRESS TEST. LV diastolic
these disorders, diastolic dysfunction often occurs in
pressure is the main parameter that characterizes LV
combination with systolic dysfunction. In some cases,
filling properties. The term LV filling pressures can
however, such as conditions with LV hypertrophy and
refer to mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
normal ejection fraction (EF), diastolic dysfunction is
(PCWP), mean left atrial (LA) pressure, LV pre-A
the main contributor to heart failure symptoms.
pressure, mean LV diastolic pressure, and LV end-
Regardless of EF, elevated LV filling pressure is the
diastolic pressure (5,6). In the early stages of dia-
most important hemodynamic parameter to explain
stolic dysfunction, only LV end-diastolic pressure is
symptoms of dyspnea. However, many clinicians
the only abnormally elevated pressure, whereas mean
utilize echocardiography mainly to assess LV volumes
PCWP and LA pressure remain normal. With tachy-
and EF in trying to draw conclusions about the
cardia and/or increased LV afterload, mean PCWP and
EF = ejection fraction LA = left atrial LV = left ventricular PCWP = pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
PH = pulmonary hypertension SPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure
TR = tricuspid regurgitation
additional
physiological
and
diagnostic
LA pressure increase, providing the basis for the diastolic stress test. Catheterization is performed F I G U R E 1 Hemodynamic Response to Exercise
while subjects are doing exercise on a variable load ergometer bicycle specially mounted at the catheter-
8
ization table in a supine position. Changes of PCWP,
A
an indirect estimate of LV diastolic pressures, during
Cardiac Index (L/min/m2)
Exercise
exercise can be assessed by right heart catheteriza-
6
tion through the right internal jugular vein. Alternately, LV diastolic pressures at rest and during
B 4
exercise can be obtained by introducing a pigtail catheter into the LV from a radial arterial access site. More accurately, instead of fluid-filled pigtail catheter, a high-fidelity pressure wire can be introduced
2
into the LV through a 5-F multipurpose catheter. For
Rest
this measurement, the pressure wire should be calibrated before and after exercise to confirm the correct operation of the device without losing its calibration
0 0
10
20
30
PCWP (mm Hg)
during measurements. By this approach, LV systolic pressure, minimal LV pressure, LV end-diastolic pressure, and mean LV diastolic pressures can be
Changes of cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure pres-
measured. The dP/dt max and dP/dtmin can also be
sures (PCWP) during exercise. Patients A and B have almost identical left
automatically traced and the time constant of LV
ventricular filling pressures and cardiac index at rest. In Patient A, there is a significant increase in cardiac index with a small change in left ventricular filling pressure (normal response), whereas in Patient B, there is a sig-
relaxation, tau, can be computed (7). This approach has an important advantage because it allows the
nificant increase in left ventricular filling pressure but smaller increase in
assessment of change in minimal LV pressure during
cardiac index during exercise.
exercise. Previous studies utilizing an invasive measurement
of
LV
pressure
demonstrate
that
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019
Ha et al.
- 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
F I G U R E 2 LVP at Rest and During Exercise
A LV Pressure (mm Hg)
At Rest
At 75 W of Exercise
150
150
100
100
50
50
0
0 Minimal LVP at Rest
B LV Pressure (mm Hg)
At Rest
At 75 W of Exercise
120
120
80
80
40
40
0
0 Minimal LVP at Rest
Representative cases of left ventricular pressure (LVP) curves at rest and at maximal exercise from 2 individuals. In patient A, minimal LVP at rest was 1.0 mm Hg and decreased to 5.4 mm Hg during maximal exercise. In patient B, minimal LVP at rest was 1.0 mm Hg and increased to 15.5 mm Hg during exercise.
augmenting LV suction is important to produce the
Thus, a decrease in minimal LV pressure reflecting
early diastolic mitral valve gradient for more rapid
the augmented LV suction during exercise is crucial
mitral valve flow in early diastole, particularly during
to maintain early LV diastolic filling without an in-
exercise, which shortens the diastolic period (8,9).
crease in LA pressure.
T A B L E 1 Summary of the Studies Validating Noninvasive Diastolic Stress Testing
Study design Population
Burgess et al., 2006 (18)
Talreja et al., 2007 (10)
Obokata et al., 2017 (11)
Prospective
Prospective
Prospective
Hong et al., 2018 (7)
Prospective
Unselected patients
Exertional dyspnea
50 HFpEF, 24 noncardiac dyspnea
Asymptomatic previous PCI
Study patients, n
37
12
74
21
Mode of exercise
Supine bicycle
Supine bicycle
Supine bicycle
Supine bicycle
Parameter of LV filling pressure during exercise
Mean LVDP
PCWP
PCWP
DLV minimal pressure
Parameter of noninvasive LV filling pressure during exercise
E/e0 medial
E/e0 medial
E/e0 medial
DE/e0 medial
Sensitivity/specificity for identifying elevated LV filling pressure, %
73/96
89/100
—
—
Correlation coefficient
0.59
—
0.57
0.51
HFpEF ¼ heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LVDP ¼ left ventricular diastolic pressure; PCI ¼ percutaneous coronary intervention; PCWP ¼ pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.
3
4
Ha et al.
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
Diastolic Stress Test
-, NO. -, 2019 - 2019:-–-
C E N T R A L IL L U ST R A T I O N Noninvasive Diastolic Stress Test
Ha, J.-W. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019;-(-):-–-.
(A) Illustrative photo of a noninvasive diastolic stress test using echocardiography. (B and C) Diastolic stress echocardiographic data acquired before and after symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise in 2 individuals with impaired relaxation and almost identical mitral inflow and annular velocities at rest. In Patient B, there is a concordant rise in both mitral E velocity and mitral annular e0 velocity with exercise, without an overall change in mitral E/e0 ratio. In Patient C, there is an increase in mitral E velocity but minimal change in e0 with exercise, resulting in increased E/e0 , suggestive of elevated left ventricular filling pressures with exercise.
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019
Ha et al.
- 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
A normal heart can increase transmitral flow during exercise with little or no increase in LA pressure
F I G U R E 3 Response in Mitral Inflow and Annular Velocities During Exercise
by lowering minimum LV diastolic pressure. In the
Baseline
failing heart, there is no fall in minimum LV diastolic
25 W
50 W
pressure with exercise, and thus the increase in transmitral gradient and flow is achieved by elevation of LA pressure. Possibly, a similar mechanism explains the elevated LA pressure found during exercise in patients with heart failure. Representative cases of
Mitral Flow
LV pressure curves at rest and at maximal exercise from 2 individuals are shown in Figure 2. Minimal LV pressure at rest was 1.9 mm Hg and decreased to 5.4 mm Hg during maximal exercise in Patient A, whereas minimal LV pressure at rest was 6.5 mm Hg
Mitral Annulus
and increased to 15.5 mm Hg in Patient B. Although cardiac catheterization remains the gold standard and provides several important hemodynamic parameters, it is not practical to submit all patients presenting with dyspnea and suspicion of HF
Diastolic stress echocardiographic data acquired before and at 2 levels of symptom-
to invasive studies. Thus, a noninvasive way to esti-
limited supine bicycle exercise in a 79-year-old woman with exertional dyspnea. Mitral
mate LV filling pressure during exercise is highly desired and forms the rationale behind the develop-
flow pattern at baseline showed normal looking mitral inflow pattern. However, following exercise, there is an exaggerated increase in mitral E velocity but minimal change in e0 , suggestive of elevated left ventricular filling pressures with exercise.
ment of the diastolic stress test. A simultaneous echocardiographic-catheterization
study
prospec-
tively conducted at rest and during exercise in sub-
exercise in normal subjects (16), but E/e 0 is expected
0
to increase with exercise in patients with myocardial
jects with exertional dyspnea has shown that E/e
provides a reliable estimation of PCWP not only at
disease.
rest but also with exercise (10). Another simultaneous
Diastolic stress echocardiography has been intro-
echocardiographic-catheterization study conducted
duced to detect exercise-induced increase in diastolic
at rest and during exercise in subjects with invasively
filling pressures by performing Doppler echocardiog-
proven heart failure with preserved EF and partici-
raphy during exercise (17). The diastolic stress test
pants with dyspnea but no identifiable cardiac pa-
refers to the use of exercise Doppler echocardiogra-
thology,
demonstrated
that
exercise
E/e 0
data
phy to detect impaired LV diastolic functional reserve
improves sensitivity and negative predictive value,
and the resulting increase in LV filling pressures
and thus these results reinforce the value of exercise
(5,6,17–20) in patients with unexplained dyspnea or
testing using invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic
subclinical diastolic dysfunction (e.g., diabetic car-
assessments to definitively confirm or refute the
diomyopathy, hypertensive patients). Preliminary
diagnosis of heart failure with preserved EF (11).
results showed that diastolic stress echocardiography
NONINVASIVE DIASTOLIC STRESS TEST (DIASTOLIC
is technically feasible for demonstrating the change
STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY). Invasive hemody-
in E/e0 (i.e., filling pressure) that occurs with exercise
namic monitoring during exercise would be most ac-
and that the hemodynamic consequences of exercise-
curate (11), but a noninvasive demonstration of this
induced increase in LV filling pressure can be
phenomenon would be more practical and clinically
demonstrated noninvasively with this novel tech-
applicable.
nique (Table 1). This test has the potential to distin-
It has been shown and validated that LV filling
guish between cardiac and noncardiac dyspnea in
pressures can be estimated by combining mitral
patients with multiple coexisting conditions causing
inflow (E) and mitral annulus (e 0 ) velocities recorded
exertional dyspnea (21).
with Doppler and tissue Doppler echocardiography,
Diastolic stress echocardiography can be per-
respectively (12–14). E and e 0 velocities increase pro-
formed using either a supine bicycle or treadmill ex-
portionally as transmitral gradient increases in sub-
ercise protocol. Of the 2 methods, exercise using a
jects with normal myocardial relaxation, whereas e0
supine bicycle is the recommended modality for dia-
velocity does not change as much as E velocity in
stolic stress echocardiography because it allows the
patients with abnormal myocardial relaxation (15). As
acquisition of Doppler recordings throughout the test
a result, E/e 0 remains essentially unchanged with
and
thus
noninvasive
assessment
of
exercise
5
6
Ha et al.
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019 - 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
F I G U R E 4 Exercise-Induced PH
Patient A
25 W
Baseline
Patient B Baseline
75 W
50 W
Mitral Flow
25 W
50 W
Mitral Flow
Mitral Annulus
Mitral Annulus
Baseline
25 W
2.4 m/s
3.0 m/s
75 W
Baseline
25 W
4.0 m/s
2.3 m/s
4 m/s
50 W
3.4 m/s
50 W
4 m/s
Diastolic stress echocardiographic data acquired before and at 2 levels of symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise in 2 individuals with exertional dyspnea. Both patients showed increase in tricuspid regurgitation velocity during exercise, suggestive of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (PH). In Patient A, there is a concordant rise in both mitral E velocity and mitral annular e0 velocity with exercise, without an overall change in mitral E/e0 ratio, indicating normal left ventricular filling pressure during exercise. In Patient B, there is an exaggerated increase in mitral E velocity but minimal change in e0 during exercise. Thus, the E/e0 ratio increases, suggestive of elevated left ventricular filling pressures with exercise.
diastolic function indices. Treadmill exercise stress
this filling pattern is typical for mild diastolic
echocardiography is an alternative as diastolic ab-
dysfunction. It is recognized as an early manifesta-
normalities normally persist even after cessation of
tion in the spectrum of diastolic abnormalities. Dur-
exercise. In supine bicycle exercise, the workload
ing exercise, there is less time for diastolic filling of
starts at 25 W and increases in increments of 25 W
the LV, as tachycardia decreases the duration of
every 3 min. Mitral inflow by pulsed Doppler echo-
diastole. To maintain or augment stroke volume,
cardiography at the level of mitral tips, mitral annular
myocardial relaxation rate should increase and LV
velocities by spectral Doppler echocardiography, and
suction should be exaggerated. It is not yet known
tricuspid
continuous-wave
whether impaired LV relaxation leads invariably to
Doppler should be recorded at baseline, during exer-
elevated LV filling pressure during exercise, as pa-
cise, and in the recovery period after termination of
tients with a similar grade of diastolic dysfunction at
exercise.
rest present a spectrum of alterations in diastolic
regurgitation
jet
by
Impaired myocardial relaxation is reflected in
function during exercise. Stress echocardiography
reduced early (E) to late (A) diastolic filling velocity
Doppler data acquired before and after symptom-
ratio or prolonged deceleration time of E velocity, and
limited supine bicycling performed in 2 individuals
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019
Ha et al.
- 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
F I G U R E 5 Interpretation of Mitral Inflow and Annular Velocities During Exercise
Baseline
25 W
Recov 2 min
13
15
19
Mitral Flow
Mitral Annulus
E/e’
The following case illustrates mitral inflow and annulus velocity pattern in a 56-year-old woman with exertional dyspnea. Because of premature tachycardia even with mild exercise, accurate measurement of mitral flow and annular velocities were not possible beyond 25 W of exercise. However, mitral flow and annular velocities at 2 min after cessation of exercise showed separation of mitral inflow E and A velocities and mitral annular e0 and a0 velocities. E/e0 in the recovery period was significantly increased and higher than at rest and at 25 W of exercise, suggesting persistent elevation of left ventricular filling pressure in the recovery period.
with impaired relaxation and almost identical mitral
with exertional dyspnea. Mitral flow pattern at base-
inflow and annular velocities at rest are shown in the
line showed normal-looking mitral inflow pattern.
Central Illustration. In Patient B, there is a concordant
However, following exercise, there is an exaggerated
rise in both mitral E velocity and mitral annular e 0
increase in mitral E velocity but minimal change in e 0 ,
velocity with exercise, without an overall change in
suggestive of elevated LV filling pressures with ex-
mitral E/e0 ratio. In Patient C on the other hand, there
ercise (Figure 3).
is an increase in mitral E velocity but minimal change
Interpretation and hemodynamic correlation. In healthy
in e 0 with exercise, suggestive of elevated LV filling
subjects, the E/e 0 ratio does not change significantly
pressures with exercise. These cases further under-
with exercise because of proportional increases in
score the need for assessing hemodynamic perfor-
both the mitral inflow and annular velocities (16);
mance using diastolic stress echocardiography. It is
this represents the normal diastolic response for
useful to further characterize these patients because
exercising subjects. Conversely, an increase in the E/
exercise could unmask diastolic abnormalities not
e0 ratio and/or systolic pulmonary artery pressure
evident under rest conditions despite similar resting
(SPAP) with exercise has been shown to parallel in-
mitral inflow and annular velocities.
creases in the LV diastolic pressures as recorded by
The diastolic stress test is not only useful in pa-
invasive measurements (18). The diastolic stress
tients with mild diastolic dysfunction with impaired
echocardiography is definitively normal if the septal
relaxation. It can also delineate an abnormal response
E/e 0 is <10 at rest and with exercise, and the peak
during exercise in subjects with normal mitral inflow
tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity is <2.8 m/s at
at rest. The following case illustrates mitral inflow
rest and with stress. A study is definitively abnormal
and annulus velocity pattern in a 79-year-old woman
when the septal E/e 0 ratio is >15, average E/e 0 is >14,
7
Ha et al.
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019 - 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
and diastolic reserve are both associated with exercise
F I G U R E 6 Changes of Minimal LVP and Velocity of Apical Untwisting
capacity, but E/e0 has greater specificity for elevated
(Backrotation) With Exercise
filling pressure and is more closely associated with the expected parameters of diastolic dysfunction. How-
–50
r = 0.687, P = 0.028
ever, the high sensitivity of diastolic reserve makes it a better test for screening for exercise-induced dia-
Minimal Apical Back-Rotation Velocity at 50 W of Exercise (Degrees/s)
8
Suction (–)
–100
stolic dysfunction (25). Exercise-induced
LV
filling
pressure
elevation
and
exercise-induced PH. Exercise-induced PH is common in subjects with reduced as well as preserved LVEF (26) and is considered as an important cause of ex-
–150
ertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance (26,27). Figure 4 illustrates a diastolic stress echocardiography acquired before and after a symptom-limited supine
Suction (+)
–200
bicycle exercise in 2 individuals with exertional dyspnea. Both patients showed increase in TR velocity during exercise, suggesting exercise-induced PH. In patient A, there is a concordant rise in both mitral E
–250
velocity and mitral annular e 0 velocity with exercise, 0
–5
5
10
20
15
ΔMinimal LVP (mm Hg)
without an overall change in mitral E/e0 ratio. In the patient B, following exercise, there is an exaggerated increase in mitral E velocity but minimal change in e0 . Thus, the E/e0 ratio increases, suggestive of elevated
Patients with a preserved LV suction during exercise showed marked increase in LV untwisting velocity with exercise whereas patients without LV
LV filling pressures with exercise. A previous study
suction during exercise showed minimal increase in LV untwisting velocity
has shown that subjects with exercise-induced PH
with exercise. LVP ¼ left ventricular pressure.
associated with an increase in E/e 0 had significantly worse outcomes than subjects without exerciseinduced PH, whereas no significant difference of
peak TR velocity is >2.8 m/s with exercise, and 0
when either the septal e velocity is <7 cm/s or the 0
clinical outcomes were found between subjects with exercise-induced PH without an increase in E/e 0 and
lateral e velocity is <10 at baseline (5,6,19,20). SPAP
subjects without exercise-induced PH (28). Thus,
measurement with exercise has been found to be
exercise-induced PH secondary to an increase in LV
helpful in aiding the assessment of diastolic filling
filling portends poorer clinical outcome. Therefore,
pressure with exercise. It has been shown that the
preventing or treating exercise-induced PH should be
<35
rest
focused on improving LV diastolic properties and
and <43 mm Hg at exercise. Exercise E/septal e >13,
decreasing the LV filling pressure at rest and during
lower amplitude of changes in diastolic longitudinal
exercise. Diastolic stress echocardiography has a sig-
velocities, and induced pulmonary hypertension
nificant role in this regard, as it can provide infor-
(PH) (SPAP $50 mm Hg) are markers of adverse
mation regarding SPAP as well as LV filling pressure
outcomes.
both at rest and during exercise.
Detection of early myocardial disease and concept of
Technical challenges. One of the practical drawbacks
diastolic reserve. Different raises of e0 during exercise,
of diastolic stress echocardiography is technical
upper
normal
SPAP
is
mm
Hg
at 0
quantified by longitudinal functional reserve, can be
difficulty in obtaining adequate 2-dimensional and
used as a parameter to evaluate LV diastolic reserve
Doppler
during exercise. Longitudinal diastolic functional
limited time particularly during exercise. Fortu-
reserve can be calculated as follows: D e 0 [1 (1 / e 0 base )],
nately, patients with marked diastolic dysfunction
where D e 0 is the change of e0 from baseline to 25 or 50 W
revealed diagnostic changes even at mild or mod-
of exercise, and e 0 base is early diastolic mitral annular
erate exertion with moderately increased heart rate.
velocity at rest (22). LV diastolic reserve is reported to
Despite this, a subset of patients develop premature
be reduced in various diseases that are associated with
tachycardia even at mild exertion, which makes a
echocardiographic
parameters
within
diastolic dysfunction, including hypertrophic cardio-
meaningful analysis difficult, as there will be fusion
myopathy, diabetes mellitus, and a subtype of hyper-
of the mitral inflow E and A signals, as well as of
tension (22–24). It has been shown that exercise E/e 0
the mitral annular e 0 and a 0 signals. In a previous
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019
Ha et al.
- 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
report (17), the test was unsuccessful in 10% of
FUTURE DIRECTIONS. Most of the previous studies
enrolled patients because of tachycardia with low
regarding diastolic stress echocardiography excluded
atrial
patients with significant coronary artery disease to
tachyarrhythmia. It has been shown that diastolic
avoid confounding effects from myocardial ischemia
dysfunction induced by exercise or ischemia per-
to the evaluation of diastolic function (17,18,22,23).
sists after recovering from myocardial ischemia or
However, in our clinical practice, patients with sig-
cessation of exercise (29). In a preliminary study, 73
nificant coronary artery disease with or without
healthy subjects underwent supine bicycle exercise
myocardial ischemia would be an important subset of
and mitral inflow parameters and diastolic velocities
patients in whom the assessment of exercise-induced
of the mitral annulus were recorded at baseline and
increase in LV filling pressure would be critically
during recovery 2, 5, and 10 min after cessation of
important. Future studies are warranted to clarify
exercise. None of the patients had E/e 0 >15 at rest,
this issue. Because the clinical value of diastolic
during exercise, or in the recovery phase for up to
stress echocardiography has been verified mostly
10 min after cessation of exercise (30). Because E/e 0
from patients with preserved LV systolic function,
was not elevated in healthy subjects, elevated E/e0
there is so far limited experience for applying this
during recovery may be helpful to detect exercise-
technique to patients with regional LV dysfunction,
induced
mitral valve disease, and atrial fibrillation.
levels
of
exercise
diastolic
and
exercise-induced
dysfunction
in
subjects
with
tachycardia even at low levels of exercise. Thus, if
Recently, it was shown that absence of a decrease
the evaluation of mitral inflow and annular veloc-
in minimal LV pressure during exercise, a manifes-
ities during exercise is not optimal due to prema-
tation of impaired LV suction, was closely linked with
ture tachycardia, another way is to evaluate these
impaired LV untwisting during exercise (7). In pa-
parameters in the recovery period after cessation of
tients with normal LVEF, previously treated for cor-
exercise. Figure 5 illustrates the mitral inflow and
onary artery disease, we have shown a range of
annular velocity pattern in a 56-year-old woman
responses when measuring minimum LV diastolic
with exertional dyspnea. Because of premature
pressure, tau, and untwisting velocity. Patients with a
tachycardia even with mild exercise, accurate mea-
decrease in minimum LV diastolic pressure had the
surement of mitral flow and annular velocities were
most marked increase in LV untwisting velocity with
not possible beyond 25 W of exercise. However, mitral flow and annular velocities obtained 2 min after cessation of exercise showed separation of
HIGHLIGHTS
mitral inflow E and A velocities and mitral annular
Diastolic dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of heart failure.
e0
and a0
velocities. More strikingly, E/e 0
was
significantly higher than at rest and during 25 W of exercise,
suggesting
persistent
elevation
of
LV
filling pressure even at recovery period. DIASTOLIC STRESS TEST IN RECENT GUIDELINES.
Recently, guidelines from the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging regarding the evaluation of LV diastolic function by echocardiography (5,6) and clinical use of stress echocardiography in nonischemic heart disease (19,20) included diastolic stress echocardiography as a valuable tool for the evaluation of patients with unexplained dyspnea and subclinical LV diastolic dysfunction. These guidelines came at the 11th anniversary of the first feasibility study of diastolic stress echocardiography after the initial description of the normal values of diastolic echocardiographic parameters with exercise in a middle-aged, healthy control subject 1 year earlier. With recent recommendations from the guidelines, it is evident that the time has come for its integration into clinical practice to provide this valuable diagnostic test to our patients (31).
Frequently, symptoms of diastolic dysfunction occur only during exercise, as LV filling pressure is normal at rest, but increases with exercise. This implies that LV filling pressures should also be measured not only at rest but also during exercise. The diastolic stress test refers to the evaluation of diastolic function, either invasively or noninvasively, during exercise, and it will provide insights into cardiovascular hemodynamics. More work is needed to refine and standardize the methodology but the integration of diastolic stress testing into clinical practice will certainly enhance our understanding and better management of patients with diastolic dysfunction and exertional dyspnea.
9
10
Ha et al.
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019 - 2019:-–-
Diastolic Stress Test
exercise (Figure 6). Furthermore, e0 velocity during
The decades of investigation into the diastolic
exercise was highest in patients with a simultaneous
stress
decrease in minimum LV diastolic pressure. The
wonderful insights into cardiovascular hemody-
change in LV end-systolic volume was similar in pa-
namics and have improved our delivery of care for
tients with a decrease or an increase in LV minimum
patients with diastolic dysfunction and exertional
pressure, suggesting that restoring forces was not
dyspnea. With these efforts and the recommenda-
accounting for the difference in e0 and untwisting
tions from the recent guidelines, it is evident that
velocity. These findings imply that dynamic changes
the integration of diastolic stress testing into clin-
in LV apical back rotation during exercise can be used
ical practice will certainly enhance our under-
as a noninvasive parameter of diastolic suction dur-
standing
ing exercise. More work is needed to refine and
patients’ conditions.
testing
and
have
allow
provided
us
to
us
better
with
many
manage
our
standardize the methodology for measuring twisting deformation, but provided that the technique is
ADDRESS
improved,
Smiseth, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University
untwisting
velocity
may
become
an
FOR
CORRESPONDENCE:
important addition to the diastolic stress echocardi-
Hospital,
ography (32).
E-mail:
[email protected].
Rikshospitalet,
N-0027
Dr. Otto A.
Oslo,
Norway.
REFERENCES 1. Packer M. Abnormalities of diastolic function as a potential cause of exercise intolerance in chronic heart failure. Circulation 1990;81 Suppl 3:III78–86. 2. Gaasch WH, Levine HJ, Quinones MA, Alexander JK. Left ventricular compliance: mechanisms and clinical implications. Am J Cardiol 1976;38:645–53. 3. Grossman W, McLaurin L. Diastolic properties of the left ventricle. Ann Intern Med 1976;84: 316–26. 4. Grossman W, Barry WH. Diastolic pressurevolume relations in the diseased heart. Fed Proc 1980;39:148–55.
10. Talreja DR, Nishimura RA, Oh JK. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressure with exercise by Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal systolic function: a simultaneous
18. Burgess MI, Jenkins C, Sharman JE, Marwick TH. Diastolic stress echocardiography: hemodynamic validation and clinical significance of estimation of ventricular filling pressure with
echocardiographic-cardiac catheterization study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:477–9.
exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1891–900.
11. Obokata M, Kane GC, Reddy YN, Olson TP, Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA. Role of diastolic stress testing in the evaluation for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a simultaneous invasive-echocardiographic study. Circulation 2017;135:825–38.
19. Lancellotti P, Pellikka PA, Budts W, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in nonischaemic heart disease: recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:1191–229.
12. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA,
20. Lancellotti P, Pellikka PA, Budts W, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in non-
Zoghbi WA, Quinones MA. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1527–33.
ischaemic heart disease: recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017;30:101–38.
13. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al.
21. Ha JW, Oh JK. Echocardiographic evaluation of
Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 2000;102:1788–94.
chronic dyspnea. In: Bax JJ, Kramer CM, Marwich TH, Wijns W, editors. Cardiovascular Imaging: A Handbook for Clinical Practice. New York, NY: Wiley, 2005; 164–74.
vascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:1321–60.
14. Andersen OS, Smiseth OA, Dokainish H, et al. Estimating left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69: 1937–48.
gitudinal myocardial functional reserve assessed by exercise tissue Doppler echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:1314–9.
7. Hong SJ, Shim CY, Kim D, et al. Dynamic change in left ventricular apical back rotation: a marker of diastolic suction with exercise. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:12–9.
15. Nagueh SF, Sun H, Kopelen HA, Middleton KJ, Khoury DS. Hemodynamic determinants of the mitral annulus diastolic velocities by tissue Doppler. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:278–85.
8. Cheng CP, Igarashi Y, Little WC. Mechanism of augmented rate of left ventricular filling during exercise. Circ Res 1992;70:9–19.
16. Ha JW, Lulic F, Bailey KR, et al. Effects of
23. Ha JW, Lee HC, Kang ES, et al. Abnormal left ventricular longitudinal functional reserve in patients with diabetes mellitus: implication for detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction using exercise tissue Doppler echocardiography. Heart 2007;93:1571–6.
5. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016;29: 277–314. 6. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardio-
9. Udelson JE, Bacharach SL, Cannon RO 3rd, Bonow RO. Minimum left ventricular pressure during beta-adrenergic stimulation in human subjects: evidence for elastic recoil and diastolic “suction” in the normal heart. Circulation 1990;82: 1174–82.
treadmill exercise on mitral inflow and annular velocities in healthy adults. Am J Cardiol 2003;91: 114–5. 17. Ha JW, Oh JK, Pellikka PA, et al. Diastolic stress echocardiography: a novel noninvasive diagnostic test for diastolic dysfunction using supine bicycle exercise Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:63–8.
22. Ha JW, Ahn JA, Kim JM, et al. Abnormal lon-
24. Choi EY, Ha JW, Yoon SJ, et al. Increased plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio is associated with impaired left ventricular longitudinal functional reserve in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:251–6. 25. Gibby C, Wiktor DM, Burgess M, Kusunose K, Marwick TH. Quantitation of the diastolic stress
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, VOL.
-, NO. -, 2019
- 2019:-–-
test: filling pressure vs. diastolic reserve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:223–7. 26. Ha JW, Choi D, Park S, et al. Determinants of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Heart 2009;95:490–4. 27. Tolle
JJ,
Ha et al. Diastolic Stress Test
Waxman
AB,
Van
Horn
T,
Pappagianopoulos PP, Systrom DM. Exerciseinduced pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2008;118:2183–9. 28. Shim CY, Kim SA, Choi D, et al. Clinical outcomes of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in
subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implication of an increase in left ventricular filling pressure during exercise. Heart 2011;97: 1417–24.
31. Oh JK, Kane GC. Diastolic stress echocardiography: the time has come for its integration into clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27: 1060–3.
29. Ishii K, Imai M, Suyama T, et al. Exerciseinduced post-ischemic left ventricular delayed relaxation or diastolic stunning: is it a reliable
32. Smiseth OA. Need for better diastolic stress test: twistin’ time is here? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:20–2.
marker in detecting coronary artery disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:698–705. 30. Ha JW, Choi EY, Choi D, et al. Time course of recovery of left ventricular filling pressure after exercise in healthy subjects. Circ J 2008;72:186–8.
KEY WORDS diastolic function, diastolic stress test, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, stress echocardiography
11