~ = ~'Eot with a polarizability ~' which depends upon the bare polarizability ~, density n and microstructure. The self-susceptibility is defined as Zs = n~'. If ~(~o) is the harmonic oscillator response (e2/m)/(o) 2 -092) of the Drude-Lorentz model, then Imgs(~O) is proportional to the density of states, i.e. to the number of normal mode frequencies of the coupled system per frequency interval. The dielectric constant c is defined from the relation between the average polarization and the average Maxwell field. It depends on the bare polarizability ~, density n and the microstructure of the system. If ~(e)) is the harmonic oscillator response of the Drude-Lorentz model, then ~olmc(~o) is proportional to the absorption spectrum. The self-susceptibility Ks may be expressed as [8] xs-
l -
Zo 4 zo,t '
(1)
where Xo = nu is the bare susceptibility, and the coefficient 2 accounts for the effect of interactions and geometrical structure. The dielectric constant E may be expressed as = 1+
4~Zs
(2)
1 - 4 z (1 +
where p is a second coefficient accounting for interactions and microstructure. Both Eqs. (1) and (2) are exact, and merely represent a reformulation of the problem. If the coefficients 2 and # are put equal to zero, then Eq. (2) reduces to the ClausiusMossotti formula for the dielectric constant. Thus, the reformulation incorporates the knowledge that the Lorentz local field is a good first approximation to the actual local field. The coefficients 2 and/~ were first defined in a multiple scattering analysis [10]. It was shown that the coefficients may be expressed in terms of a cluster expansion 2=
2s, s--2
/~ =
¢~s, s
2
(3)
B. CichockL B.U. FelderhoflPhysica A 241 (1997) 6-11
9
where 2s and #s are given by cluster integrals involving the solution of an s-particle problem and integration over an s-body correlation function. In the scaling limit the coefficients 2, # tend to values 2,,(~(0), #u()~0) depending only on the product g o = n e t . The functions 2~(Zo),#u(Z0 ) can be expressed as sums of well-defined corresponding cluster integrals 2~(Z0), #us(Z0). The pair integrals 2u2(~(0), #~2(Z0) are quite simple and easily evaluated. Their values are 2g •~u2(Z0) = ~-i,
2 #~2(g0)= - ~ ln2,
(4)
for Im Z0 > 0. For Im Z0 < 0 the coefficient 2~2 has the opposite sign. If all higher order cluster integrals are neglected, then the approximate values for 2,,#~ lead to shifted and broadened Lorentzian lines for the density of states and the absorption spectrum. The higher order universal cluster integrals 2us, #us for s ~>3 are difficult to calculate. In the self-consistent ring approximation a large class of the contributing many-body scattering processes is summed. As a first step one evaluates ring integrals 2es(Z0) and #Rs(ZO) as a contribution of ring diagrams. Summing over all s~>3 one finds corresponding functions 2R(Z0),#R(Z0). As a second step the self-susceptibility Zs is approximated as the solution of the self-consistent equation Zo Zsu = 1 -
4gZ0[~u2 +
2R(ZSu)] "
(5)
An analysis of the multiple scattering expansion shows that this implies summation of a large class of scattering sequences. The imaginary part of the solution Zs~ of Eq. (5) provides the self-consistent ring approximation to the exact universal density of states. As a third step one derives a corresponding approximation to the dielectric constant, by substitution of the approximate value # R ( Z S ) into the exact relation Eq. (2). This yields as an approximation to the universal dielectric constant 47rZs~ e~ = 1 + 1 - 47tXSu[1 + #u2 ÷ #R(ZSu)]
(6)
The imaginary part of the self-susceptibility Zsu given by Eq. (5) leads to a distortion and shift of the Lorentzian density of states found with only the two-particle cluster integral. The absorption lineshape found from the imaginary part of dielectric constant cu given by Eq. (6) is also a distorted and shifted Lorentzian.
3. Influence of microstructure
The universal scaling functions Zsu(){o) and eu(Zo) depend only on the product The functions are given approximately by Eqs. (5) and (6). At low density n the exact self-susceptibility Zs and dielectric constant e of any fluid of atoms with polarizable point dipoles tend to the universal values Zsu and eu, but at higher density the microstructure of the fluid makes itself felt. This can be seen from the Zo=n~.
10
B. Cichocki, B . U . F e l d e r h o f / P h y s i c a
A 241 ( 1 9 9 7 ) 6 - 1 1
exact expressions for the cluster integrals 2s and ]2s. For example the pair integral 22 is given exactly by [8,11]
r6 - 2Z2 4zz)y(n-l/3r)r2 dr
)~2 = 6Z0
(r 6 _ ~02~~ -
,
(7)
2an I 3
where 9(R) is the radial distribution function, and a is the hard core radius. Similarly, the pair integral ]22 is given exactly by
]22 = 6Z2
f
F3 ( r6 -- Z2)( r6 -- 4Z2) y ( n o I/3r) r2 dr.
(8)
2an ~ 3
Evidently, the dependence of these integrals on the bare susceptibility Z0 is influenced by the fluid structure via the radial distribution function. The higher order cluster integrals 2s, ]2s involve higher order partial distribution functions. The pair integrals 22 and ]22 can be evaluated numerically without difficulty for a given radial distribution function 9(R). For semi-dilute fluids the function 9(R) may be approximated by the Boltzmann factor exp[-/~v(R)], where v(R) is the pair interaction. The universal two-particle cluster integrals 2u2 and #u2, obtained by taking the limit n ~ 0 in Eqs. (7) and (8), are particular examples of ring integrals. The self-consistent ring approximation may be corrected for structural effects at the two-particle level by the replacement of the universal pair values }~u2 and ]2u2, as given by Eq. (4), by the exact pair integrals 22(Z0) and ]22(Z0). Correspondingly the self-consistent equation, Eq. (5), for the self-susceptibility is replaced by Zo zs = 1 - %~0[)~:(zs)
(9) + ,~R(zs)] '
and Eq. (6) for the dielectric constant is replaced by
47tZs e = 1 + 1 - 34-~zs[1 + ] 2 2 ( z s ) + ] 2 R ( z s ) ]
(10)
We have compared the imaginary part of the solution )~s of Eq. (9) with the density of states found by computer simulation for a hard sphere fluid [4] at volume fraction ¢p=0.1 and with that for a Lennard-Jones fluid [3] at volume fraction ~ ~ 0.05, and found fairly good agreement [8]. The corresponding values of the dielectric constant, as given by Eq. (10), are also in fair agreement with the simulation data [9].
4. Discussion
We have developed a scheme which allows approximate calculation of the complex dieleetric constant and self-susceptibility of a fluid consisting of atoms with a polarizable point dipole at their center. At low fluid density the dependence on frequency of the linear response properties is dominated by universal scaling functions.
B. Cichocki, B.U. Felderhof/Physica A 241 (1997) 6-11
11
At higher densities the response is influenced by structural effects. The universal scaling functions are defined exactly as sums of cluster integrals, but can be evaluated only approximately. A self-consistent ring approximation, corrected for structural effects on a pair level, yields fairly good agreement of the predicted response properties with simulation data for semi-dilute fluids. The Drude-Lorentz harmonic oscillator model, combined with the electrostatic dipole approximation, provides a benchmark system in the study of the electrical response of polarizable fluids. A successful approximation scheme developed for this model can be extended without great difficulty to more complicated systems. For example, by including higher order multipoles one could apply the scheme to the calculation of the effective dielectric constant of a suspension of uniform spheres. The absorption spectrum corresponds to the spectral density in the Bergrnan representation of the effective dielectric constant [12]. Simulation data for the spectral density exist for hard sphere suspensions in a range of volume fractions [13]. It would be of interest to elaborate the approximation scheme for this model and compare with simulation data. The theory developed here is of importance beyond the study of electrical response properties. Many physical phenomena can be understood as the linear response of a many-particle system to an applied force, with coupling between particles communicated by a propagating field. As examples we mention sedimentation and effective viscosity of fluid suspensions, and the effective elastic properties of solid suspensions. References [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
L. Rosenfeld, Theory of Electrons (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1951) p. 59. B. Cichocki and B.U. Felderhof, J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 4960. J.A. Leegwater and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 6062. B. Cichocki and B.U. Felderhof, J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990) 6104. B. Cichocki and B.U. Felderhof, J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990) 6112. J.A. Leegwater and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 146. S.J. Schvaneveldt and R.F. Loring, J. Chem. Phys. 101 (1994) 4133. B. Cichocki and B.U. Felderhof, J. Chem. Phys. 104 (1996) 3013. B. Cichocki and B.U. Felderhof, submitted for publication. B. Cichocki and B.U. Felderhof, J. Stat. Phys. 53 (1988) 499. B.U. Felderhof, G.W. Ford and E.G.D. Cohen, J. Stat. Phys. 28 (1982) 649. D.J. Bergman, Phys. Rep. 43 (1978) 377. K. Hinsen and B.U. Felderhof, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 12 955.