Differential effect of haloperidol on DOPAC levels in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area

Differential effect of haloperidol on DOPAC levels in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area

683 Pharmacological Research Communications, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1980 DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF HALOPERIDOL ON DOPAC LEVELS IN TIlE SUBSTANTtA N IGRA AND V...

287KB Sizes 7 Downloads 123 Views

683

Pharmacological Research Communications, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1980

DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF HALOPERIDOL ON DOPAC LEVELS IN TIlE SUBSTANTtA N IGRA AND VENTRAL TEGMENTAL AREA, ~:A. ARGIOLAS, F. FADDA, M.R. MELIS and G.L. GESSA

I n s t i t u t e s of Pharmacology and Physiology, University o f Cagl i a r i , Italy,

SUMMARY The e f f e c t of acute (i m9/k9) and c h r o n i c 0 mg/kg daily For 15 days) haloperldol treatment on DOPAC concentration in the subst~ntia Jllgra and ventral tegmental area was compared. Neither acute nor chronic haloperldol treatment modified DOPAC concentration in the VTA or DA concentration in both the areas. Two hrs a f t e r acute haloperidol DOPAC increased by about 130% in the substantla nigPa, remained elevated For about 6 hrs and returned to normal w i t h i n 24 h r s . On t h e c o n t r a r y , a f t e r c h r o n i c h a l o p e r l d o l treatment, DOPAC levels in the substantia n l g r a remained maximally e l e v a t e d For s e v e r a l days and r e t u r n e d t o c o n t r o l v a l u e on the 5th day F o l l o w i n g h a l o p e r l d o l withdrawal, INTRODUCTION

dopamine

Acute n e u r o l e p t i c

administration

(DA) synthesis

in the striatum,

(see Carlsson, ]g75;

cortex

Julou etal,

is known t o

increase

n, accumbens and Frontal

1977) p r e s u m a b l y by b l o c k -

ing DA r e c e p t o r s ,

The change

parallel

in the content o f 3 , 4 - d l h y d r o x y p h e n y l a c e t l c

increase

in DA s y n t h e s i s

is correlated

with a acid

(DOPAC), the deaminated DA metabolite (see Westerink and KorF, Ig76). Tolerance to the effects on DA synthesis develops after chronic neuro|eptic administration cortical

in the nigrostriatal

t976),

DA system (see Julou e t a l ,

but not in the mesa-

The cell bodies oF the

mesocortical DA system a r e m a i n l y l o c a t e d in the v e n t r a l

tegmental

area (VTA), the area I0, while those of the n i g r o s t r i a t a l system are in the p a r s compacta o f the s u b s t a n t i a

I964),

Recent e v i d e n c e

in the nerve t e r m i n a l s

has shown t h a t but also

nigra

( S N ) ( D a l h s t r o m and Fuxe,

DA i s p r e s e n t n o t o n l y

in t h e c e l l

b o d i e s and d e n d r i t e s

dopamlner9ic neurons in the SN and VTA (see Lindvall e t a l , Presented at the Third Italian-Soviet Brain Function

~31-~89/80~3--0~2.00~

of

1978).

Symposi~im on Ncurotransmitt~rs

and

Q19~Thelt~li~nPharma~l~lS~,ety

PharmacologicalResearchCommunication&VoL 14 No, ~ 1980

684 Moreover

it

thereby

has been s u g g e s t e d t h a t

exherting

activity

an i n h i b i t o r y

control

1975;

Nieoullon

(groves et

shown t h a t gesting

al,

haloperidol

that

DA i s r e l e a s e d

on d o p a m i n e r g i c

1977),

et al,

c a u s e s DOPAC a c c u m u l a t i o n

nedroleptics

From d e n d r i t e s

i n c r e a s e DA r e l e a s e

neuronal

We have

in t h e SN, s u g -

From d e n d r i t e s

in

this area (Fadda eb al, 1977), The present report was at clarifying i f

the d i f f e r e n t

response of nigrostriatal

DA s y s t e m s t o c h r o n i c different

effect

of

neuroleptlc

was c o r r e l a t e d

t h e s e d r u g s on DA m e t a b o l i s m

t i l e VTA. We show t h a t

chronic

sistent

increase

neither

acute nor chronic

DOPAC l e v e l s

treatment

and m e s o c o r b l c a l

haloperidol

in t h e DOPAC c o n t e n t haloperidol

of

to a

in the SN and in

treatment

causes a per-

the SN. On t h e c o n t r a r y

treatment

is able

to m o d i f y

in the VTA,

MATERIAL AND METHODS Maie Sprague Dawley r a t s ,

weighing

initially

160-180 g

were u s e d , The a n i m a l s were housed 4 p e r cage a t ~4°C, 50-60~, before

and 12 hr

llght-dark

the experiments.

cycle,

starting

The a n i m a l s r e c e i v e d

dol

below.

saline time.

injections

the brain

30°C u n t i l

analyses,

was r a p i d l y

(Fadda eb e l ,

Control

1977;

analyzed.

ble

Tassin'et

labot~atoryf

acute or chronic received rats

halopenl-

t h e same numbe

of

a t the c o r r e s p o n d i n g

were k i l l e d

al,

1978)

by d e c a p i t a t i o ~

on i c e and s t o r e d

DA and DOPAC were d e t e r m i n e d

(Serenase,

Form. The s t a t i s t i c a l

t e d by t h e S t u d e n t ' s

rats

one week

removed and t h e SN and VTA were d i s s e c t e d at -

in t h e same

and Fadda,

1978),

J a n s s e n ) was used in c o m m e r c i a l l y

availa-

sample by o u r r a d l o e n z y m a t i c Haloperidol

rats

as t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l

For b i o c h e m i c a l

least

They had w a t e r and s t a n d a r d

Food ad l i b i t u m . as i n d i c a t e d

at

humidity

method ( A r g i o l a s

significance E best.

of

the results

was e v a l u a -

Pharmaco/ogica/ Research Communicat(ons, Vol, 12, No. 7, 1980

685

RESULTS Fig I shows the time course oF the eE~ects oF I rag/k9 i . p . haloperidol on DOPAC levels reported, DOPAC increased

in the SN ai~d VTA. As prev~)usly

in the SN by about 13C~ 2 hrs af~t'eP

treat:manE, remained elevated Fop about.6 hrs and returned to control value in approxim.~tely 24 hrs. On the contrary no chanoe in DOPAC concentration was observed in the VTA. Haloperidol Failed to change DA levels e i t h e r

in the SN or in the VTA.

,1.O

=,-o S N . A

"

..

~

VTA

,

-- 200" 0 t,.

c 0 (J qk.

0

C) <

o. 0 r~ v 0 o

,

ill

i,

i

? 1.

_. . . . . . . . . . .

,,,6. . . . . . . . . 1

Fig

-

Time course

2

of

3

the

changes

4

5

i n d u c e d by !

hours

> /

~........ 24

m g / k 9 oF h a l o p e -

t i d a l i . p . on DOPAC levels in the substantia nigra (SN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA). Each value is the mean + S.E. oF 5 determinations. In control P a t s the DOPAC c--ontent in the SN and VTA was 1724+154 ng/g and I554+_142 n9/g r e s p e c t i v e l y . ~ P(O.O01; ~ P(O.O5 in respect o f saline c o n t r o l s .

Pharmacological Research Communications, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1980

686

F i g 2 shows DOPAC l e v e l s after

khe l a s t

injection

(J mg/kg,

daily

injection

treatment

24 h r s , elevated

ruption,

oF a c h r o n i c

For JS d a y s )

DOPAC l e v e l s

As a f t e r

was p r e s e n t

returned

treatment

up the 4 t h day a f t e r only

treatment

, While after

Followlng a chronic

ned to c o n t r o l v a l u e

in the SN a t d i F F e r e n t

to control

haloperidol

the a c u t e t r e a t m e n t chronic

haloperidol haloperidol value within

they remained maxlmally withdrawal

no change

and r e t u r -

haloperidoi

inter-

in DOPAC l e v e l s

treatment,

SUBSTANTIA [~

a single

a t the 5th day a f t e r

in the VTA a f t e r

with

times

NIGRA

CHRONIC SALINE CHRONIC

HALOPERIDOL

200 0

L.

0 U

U 9K

tOO

L

o

o

2

;P4

48

72

t20

h r a f t e r HAL

F i g 2. DOPAC l e v e l s in the s u b s t a n t i a n i g e a a t v a r i o u s t i m e s a f t e r the l a s t i n j e c t i o n o f a c h r o n i c t r e a t m e n t w i t h h a l o p e r i d o l (1 mg/k9 i , p , d a i l y f o r 15 d a y s ) and a f t e r the a c u t e i n j e c t i o n oF 1 mg/kg h a l o p e r i d o l in r a t s c h r o n i c a l l y t r e a t e d w i t h s a l i n e . Each v a l u e i s the mean + S.E= oF 5 d e t e r m i n a t i o n s . DOPAC l e v e l s in the VTA were n o t mod i f i e d e i t h e r by a c u t e o r c h r o n i c h a l o p e r i d o l , * P ¢ 0 , 0 0 1 in r e s p e c t oF sai ine t r e a t e d r a t s =

Pharmacological Research Communications, VoL 12, No. 7, 1980

687

IU scuss I ON, The p r e s e n t r e s u l t s i n f l u e n c e s DOPAC l e v e l s to haloperidol cteristics

show t h a t h a l o p e r i d o l

differentially

in the SN and VTA. Two d i s t i n c t

suggest d i f f e r e n t

o f the n i g r o s t r i a t a l

increase on DOPAC l e v e l s

regulatory

and F u n c t i o n a l

and m e s o c o r t i c a l

in the SN a f t e r

ted on axonal nating

chara-

DA systems. The

acute h a i o p e r i d o l

be due to the blockade o f DA a u t o r e c e p t o r s p r e s e n t (Nagy e t a l ,

responses

might

in t h i s

area

1978) or o f the D A - s e n s l t i v e a d e n y l a t e c y c l a s e t e r m i n a l s o f neurons i n n e r v a t i n g

in the striatum ( Gale et e l ,

1976t Spano e t e l ,

loca-

the SN and o r i g i -

1977; Kebabian and Saavedra,

1977).

In co,,trast to the SN, no evidence has been provided as yet For the existence in the VTA of DA autoreceptors, nor o f DAsensitive adenylate cyclase (Premont et e l ,

1976).Moreover,

there

is no evidence For a Feedback loop From the l imbic or c o r t i c a l areas to the VTA. Thus, none of those elements on which h a l o p e r i dot might operate when modifying DOPAO content seems to be present in the VTA. The p e r s i s t e n t increase in SN DOPAC content: a f t e r

inter-

ruption of chronic haloperidol treatment might indicate a stable modification in DA synthesis and cannot be correlated with the

presence o f h a l o p e r i d o l

in the b r a i n ,

even up to the 4 t h day a f t e r

haloperidol

drug i s c o m p l e t e l y el i m i n a t e d , t h e s i s might r e f l e c t

since the

increase p e r s i s t s

withdrawal,

The p e r s i s t e n t

an enhanced s t i m u l a t i o n

when the

change in DA syno f a u t o r e c e p t o r s clue

to an increased r e l e a s e o f DA From d e n d r i t e s ,

T h i s mechanism might

contribute to the development o f tolerance to the e f f e c t s o f haloperidol

in the n i g r o s t r i a t a l system, On the contrary, the absence

o f changes in DA metabolism in the VTA a f t e r chronic haloperidol treatment m i g h t explain the lack of tolerance to the e f f e c t s of

haioperidoi

on DA s y n t h e s i s

in the m e s o c o r t l c a l

DA system,

688

Pharmacological Hesearch Communications, VoL 12, No. 7, 1980

REFERENCES Argiolas A, and Fadda F,, Experientia 34, 739-741 (1978), Carisson A,, in Pre- and p o s t - s y n a p t i c Receptors, ads E, Usclin end W,E, Bunney,jr, Marcel Dekkert New York, pp, 45-63 (1975). Dalhstrom A. and Fuxe K,, Acta PFysiol. Scand, 6.22, suppl. 232,

t-55 (1964). Fadda F,, Argiolas A., Stefenini E. and Gessa G.L,, Life Sci. 21, 411-418 (1977), Gale K., Guidotti A. and Costa E., Science 195, 503-505 (1977). Groves P.M,, Wilson C,J., Youn9 S,J, and Rebec G.V., Science 190,

522-529 (1975), Julou t , , Scatton B, and Glowlnski J., in Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology, eds E, Costa and G,L, Gessa, Vol 16, Raven Press, New York, pp, 617-624 (1977). Kebabian J,W. and Saavedra J,M., Science 193, 683-685 (1976). Lindvall 0,, Bjorklund A. and Divac I , , Brain Res. [42, [-24

(1978). Nagy J,T,, Lee P,, Seaman P. and Fibiger H.Clp Nature 274, 278-

281 (1978). Nieoullon A,, Cheramy A. and Glowinski J., Nature 266, 375-377

(1977). Premont J , , T h i e r r y A.M., Tassin J , P , , Glowinski J . , Blanc G, and Bockaert J,, FEBS Letters 68, 99-104 (1976), Spano P.F., Trabucchi M. and Di Chiara G., Science 196,13431345 (1977). Tassin J , P , , Stinus L., Simon H., Blanc O,, T h i e r r y A,M,, [e Meal M,, Cardo B, and Glowinski J . , Brain Res. 141,,, 267-281 (1978). Westerink B.H.C, and Karl J,, Brain Res. 113, 429-434 (1976).