DIFFERENTIAL /KGRP
BY PRIMARY
ENTERIC P. K. Q.
M.
R.
and
IIcpartmcnts
A.
S. G. AMAKA.: S. R.
SPOICES.*
J. M.
AND
NEURONS
NEURONS
GHATEI.*
A.
S. KANSI-,*
OF cc-CGRP
SENSORY
AUTONOMIC
MLJI IW:RRY,*
HAMID.+
A.
EXPRESSION
AND
OF THE
P. M.
JOSI~S,*
BYRRIK,*
A.
RAT M.
S. LIGOV.$
PII RSOh.*
J. M. Par Alit
BLOOM*
of *Medicme.
tHistochem,strg and ~Chcmical Pathology. Royal Poctgradu.ttc Mcd~c:~l School, Flammersmith ljospital. Du C’ane Road. London W 12 OHS. I1.K. ol’ Molecular Nourohiology, Yale Unlvcrsity School of Mcdlcinc. Cedar Street. N\;cM lla~cn. C‘T 06510, CJ.S.A.
:Sectlon
Abstracts -C~prcss~on of the calcitonin gene-related peptide. r-calcitonln gene-related peptide (C‘GRP). and the homologous /I-CGRP were compared ,n sensor! and cntcrlc nerves of the rat. Ann1>vh of (‘GRP-like immunor~activit4 by cation exchange chromatography and radiotmmunoassaq hhoued that in the dorwl root $snpha, dorsal spinal cord and in those peripheral tisSt,es Lchere CGRP-like tnmunorcactiwty is primarily localircd to sensory libra. r-CGRP concentra,,ons wcrc three to 51, tl,nc\ grcatcr than /j-CARP concentrations. In the intcst,nc. however. /I-CARP conct‘ntrxtions ~L’I-c’up to w\cn times greatt‘r than r-C‘GRP concentrations. OnI) /I-CGRP HX detcc,cd ,n the Intcstincs t>f capuiclntreated rats. Northcm blot and in .vi/rr hyhridimtlon to r-CARPand /I-CARP-spwilic probes ahwbced that \hhile both x-CGRP and [I-CGRP mcsscngcr rihonucleic acids occurred in the dorsal Iroot ganglia. onl) /bCGRP messcngc~- rlbonuclcic ;tc~d occurred in the intestine. v,here It \\;I\ localized to t’nttxic IICUI-ens. Rcccptor binding sites on mt’mbranes of rat heart and colon had approumatcl> cqwl atlimtw 1;,1- r-CCiRP and /i-CGRP. The two pcptidcs wrc cquipotent in increasing the rate and force of atrul contraction\ hul r-CARP W:I\ slightly (2.6 time<) more potent than /I-<‘GRP 111rclawng colonic \moc)th musck!
Antlscra
raised
ncuropcplidc scripta
01‘
the
the
rcacti\ity
I I1
the
brain.
scnsorq
arc
tisbuc5.‘i
In
vasculaturc.
capzalcin. l,.lturc,i” C’GRI’-1~1
widely
man>
tract
and
in
indicating ,:I,‘, “‘y’44i4~ also
these
that
they
unatfcctcd
r-CGRP.’ (/j-CGRP)
the
containing
The
shin.
arc absent
after
OI with
sensory
in
houc~er.
intrinsic capsaicin
cntcric trcat-
and
this
residue
sensory
that
raised
against
x-CARP
not
/I-CARP
iwlatcd
in
the
be established
ha\c
expressed
and
rcsiduc
l’ot- rat
structural
raiw\
ho-
the
dctcctcd
ncccssal-iI)
h! the
antlwra 01‘
/I-C‘(;Rf’ and
E:v,Ing hunx,n
of
cord“
poshi-
product
human
spinal
at
acid I-esiduc\.
been she\+ n to euprchs r-C‘C;RP.“’
expression
entails
pcptide
close
.4lthough
absence
Lvhcthcr
necessarily
/i-C‘GRP
is
pcptidc
to occ,~r ,n the
/I-C‘GRP
fl-om
cc‘ll lines
shwn
:I to
(mRN.4)
acid
C’GRPl.1
-C‘GRP
gene expression.
been
Sarcoma
all Y
amino
The
of
by the st,hst,-
;I $utamatc
been
and
encoding
honiolog!
onI>
of37
ganglia.
that
prccuI-sor
homologous
for
ribonucleic
ol’ r-CARP
the
r-CGRP
has prcviousl~
bility
arc
rat
from
;I lysine
from
structur:il
35 in the sequence
mology
gene
tbc
messenger
brain
has
In
gene
encodes
close
dilTcrs
/KGRP
tract.
nconatally
‘-
of
position
intestine. the
tution
peripheral
a separate
r-CGRP
bearing
immuno-
including
arc
and
peptidc
;iutononiic
rat
fibrcs
treated
to
In rat and man calcitonin
pathHays
respirator>
rats
In
used
tibres in
tissues
OCCUI-s nithin
nci-vc‘b \\hich remain n~cl,,,. o- 111 Ii i’i1’
Nerve
tran-
inotoncurons.
enteric
stomach.
pcnitalia,
dcplctcd
spinal
in
periphei-al
been
neuronal
distributed
oesophagus.
residue
CGRP-like
and
and
- IOI i Ia2II.‘I22:1 151’)4’
ncL,r(l,,~,c
have
of
in cranial
acid
b> altcrnati\e
in specific
neurons
CGRI’-I-1
urinary
37-amino
gcnc.
presence
(CGRP-LI)
markedly
the
cncodcd
calcitonin
demonstrate
within
against
x-CGRP.
production Mhcther
indcpcndcntl~
I, rcni;I,,,x
to
01 the rat /I-C‘(;RP of
the t\\o
the
predicted
(‘GRf’
in ditfcrcnt
gcnch
p~~pularion\
0 I. ne II ro n 5. Pharmacolo~ic;il and
/i-CARP
and
the
pcptides
exhibit
propertx\
but
wnip;rrisc~nz
01‘ human
rat
ha\e
iii-c
x-(‘GRP qualitati\el~ not
nccwwrilv
r-C‘(
indlcatcd
Gmil;ii-
iR 1’ that
bioi~>$c;il
cqulpotcnt.
‘-
196
P. K.
~CiLUEKKV
Whether independent a-CGRP and p-CGRP receptor systems exist or whether both peptides act through a single receptor type is not known. We have studied the expression of r-CGRP and ,&-CGRP in sensory and enteric nerves of the rat
using radioimmunoassay and high performance cation exchange chromatography to analyse CGRP-LI in tissues of normal and capsaicin-treated animals. Northern blot and in situ hybridization to r-CGRPand P-CGRP-specific probes were used to determine sites of synthesis of the peptides in the intestines and sensory ganglia. To see whether the peptides can act independently, we have compared their properties in receptor binding assays and isolated rat organ bioassays. EXPRRI~ENTAL
PROCEDURES
Pepiides
Synthetic rat a-CGRP was purchased from Bachem U.K. Rat /I-CGRP was synthesized according to the predicted structure’ by Dr F. Bellini, Institut Armand-Frappier, Quebec, Canada. Anim&
Tissues were taken from Wistar rats of either sex weighing 150-300 g. Animals undergoing capsaicin treatment received doses of capsaicin (50mg/kg weight, Fluka AG, Switzerland) on days 2 and 3 of postnatal life as previously described.43 Littermate controls received injections of vehicle solution only. Capsaicin-treated animals and controls were sacrificed at the age of 12 weeks.
et
ui.
Fractions were collected for intervais of I mm and aliquots of 200 ~1 assayed with each radioimmunoassay. Northern blor hybridization
Deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) probes complementary to 3’-non-coding sequences of a-CGRP and [f-CGRP mRNAs excised from SP6-4 expression vectors’ were iabelled with ‘lP by random hexanucleotide priming.8 Total cellular RNA was extracted from rat dorsal root ganglia and from rat intestinal longitudinal muscle layer stripped away to include the myenteric plexus3* by the guanidinium isothiocyanatei caesium chloride ultracentrifugation method.?’ Twenty micrograms total RNA were size-separated by electrophoresis on a 3(N-Mo~holino)propanesuiphoni~ acidagarose formaldehyde gei2’ and transferred by Northern blotting to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham International). Hybridization was performed by incubation with labelled probes overnight at 42°C in 50mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8, containing 50% (v/v) formamide. 0.75 M sodium chloride, 75mM sodium citrate and IOOpgjml sonicated, denatured herring sperm DNA with Denhardt’s solution composing 25g/l bovine serum albumin. (BSA, Pentax fraction V, Sigma), 2.5 g/l Ficoli 400 (Pharmacia), 2.5 g/l poiyvinylpyrrolidone, (PVP) (Sigma) to reduce nonspecific binding. The membrane was then washed in 15 mM sodium chloride, 1.5 mM sodium citrate and 0. I g/l sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) for 30min at 60°C as described elsewhere.26 Hybridization bands were visualized by exposing pre-flashed XAR-5 film (Kodak) to the filter for 14 days at -70°C with a fast tungstate intensifying screen (Ilford).
in situ hybridization Rat colonic tissue was fixed in 4Og/l paraformaldehyde for 4 h and then rised in 0.1 M uhosohate-buffered 0.15 M saline pH 7.4. Sections IOgm ihick’ were cut at -2OY.Z Complementary RNA (cRNA) probes for 3’non-coding Rudioimmunoassays seauences of a-CGRP and B-CGRP mRNA were labeiled For radioimmunoassay and cation exchange chrowiih “S and ‘2P using SP6 polymerase and labelled cytosine matography, CGRP-LI was extracted from fresh rat tissues by boiling in 0.5 M acetic acid as previously described.2829 triphosphate on linearized SP6-4 vectors.’ Control probes were prepared by labelling non-complementary (sense) Two CGRP radioimmunoassays were used. One (a-CGRP assay) was the same as described previously” and used an RNA from a-CGRP and b-CGRP coding sequences. Preparation of the cryostat sections and hybridization were antiserum (code CG7) raised in a rabbit immunized with carried out essentially as described by Hamid et a1.r6Briefly. synthetic rat a-CGRP’conjugated to bovine serum albumin sections were permeabilized with Triton X-100 and pro(BSA) by a glutaraldehyde reaction. This antiserum crossreacts with /I-CGRP by only 2% on relative molar basis.30 teinase K, and prehybridization carried out with 50% (v/v) formamide in 0.3 M sodium chloride, 30 mM sodium citrate The second assay (total-CGRP) used an antiserum (code for 30min at 37°C. Hybridization was carried out by CG3) raised in a rabbit immunized with synthetic rat diluting the relevant probe (2.-3 ng per section) in 250 mM G(-CGRP conjugated to RSA by a carbodiimide reaction. Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.5, containing 50% (v/v) formamide, This antiserum cross-reacts fullv with rat B-CGRP.) Anart 100 g/l dextran suiphate, 0.3 M sodium chloride, 30 mM from the antisera, ail reagents-and conditions used in* the two assays were identical to those previously deseribed.28,29 sodium citrate, 2.5 g/l BSA, 2.5 g/l Ficoil 400, 2.5 g/l PVP, 5 g/l sodium pyrophosphate, 5 g/l SDS and 250 pg/ml denaThe sensitivities of the radioimmunoassays were approximately 1 fmol and 2 fmol a-CGRP per assay tube re- tured salmon sperm DNA overnight at 42°C followed by washing in standard saline citrate at 45°C. finishing with spectively. 75 mM sodium chloride, 7.5 mM sodium citrate at 45’C for Cation exchange chromatography 30min. The slides were dipped in Ilford K5 emulsion, exposed for 3 days at 4°C and developed with Dl9 developer Acetic acid tissue extracts were de-salted for cation exchange chromatography on Sep-Pak reverse-phase car(Kodak). Specificity of hyb~~zation was checked by comof complementary probes to tridges (Waters Associates) from which CGRP-LI was parison with hybri~~tion eluted with a 60/40 (v/v) acetonitrile/water mixture containsections pre-treated with ribonuciease and with hybridization of non-complementary probes to normal sections. ing 0.1% by volume trifluoroacetic acid. The eluate was diluted with 4 volumes 50 mM 2(N-MorpholinokethaneReceptor binding assay sulphonic acid/sodium hydroxide buffer pH 6.0, containing 0.05% by volume Tween 80 (buffer A) before injection onto Rat tissue membranes for receptor binding experiments a Pharmacia Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography (FPLC) were prepared by homogenizing rat tissues in 50mM system equipped with Pharmacia Mono-S cation exchange Tris-HCI buffer pH 7.4, containing 0.32 M sucrose at 4°C column eluted at I ml/min with buffer A. Two minutes flOm1 per gram of tissue) using an Ultra-Turrax homofollowing injection of the sample a linear gradient of 50 min genizer. The homogenates were centrifuged at 1OOOgfor duration between elution with buffer A and elution with 2Omin and the supernatant decanted and retained. The buffer B (composition as for buffer A but containing also pellet was re-homonogenized and centrifuged according 0.5 M sodium chloride) was developed, after which the to the same procedure. The combined supernatants were column was eluted for a further IOmin with buffer B. then centrifuged at 50,OOOg for 20min and the pellets
r-CGRP
and /I-CGRP
in sensory and cntcric ncrvc\
resuspended m 50 mM Tris -HCI buffer pH 7.4. containing 0.2 M sodium chloride. This procedure was repeated twice and the protein content of the resuspended membranes assayed by a Coomassie blue dye method (Picrcc U.K. reagents). Membrane preparations were stored frozen at -20 C until use. Synthetic rat x-CGRP and p-CGRP were labelled with “‘1 using the chloramine-T method as for radioimlnunoassay.~~ “’ Specllic activity of the tracers. estimated by self displacement in the receptor assay. ranged from 20 50 Bq’fmol.
CGRP-LI
(pmol/cj)
60 IA
For receptor blnding experiments. membranes (50 200 /tg protein) were Incubated at 20 <‘ in 50 mM Tris-HCI huller pH 7.4 containing 0.2 M sodium chloride. 3 g, I BSA and 40 mg.l bacltracin with rad~olabellcd r-CGRP or /I-CGRP and \arnous concentrations of unlabelled z-CGRP or /j-CGRP in a total volume of 0.5 ml. After 60 min incubation uith gentle agitation. I ml Tris HCI buffer contain~ng 0.2 M sodium chloride at 4 C was added and bound and free ligand separated hq centrifugation at l2,OOOg for 3 min. 7 he pellets were washed with I .O ml Tris HCI. 0.2 M sodium chloride bulrer, recentrifuged. the supcrnatant rcmovcd and radioactivity in the pellets counted.
*
Isolated rat atria were suspended in 1Oml organ baths contaimng Ringer Locke solution at 30 C. aerated wth IOO”~, oxygen. Isotonic recordings were made under 0.5 g tensIon on a Washington 400 MD4C four channel chart recorder Segments of mid-colon (5 cm) were placed in IO ml organ baths containing Tyrode solution at 37 C aerated with 95’!0 0 z 5%) CO, Isotonic recordings were made under 0 5 g tensIon a\ for atria. In all experiments sqnthetlc peptides aere dissolved in the relevant solution and added to the organ bath in volumes up to 0.3 ml at 8 IO min dose
interv:tl\. RESllLTS
To determine the effects of capsaicin treatment on CGRP-LI in the rat alimentary tract. extracts 01 alimentary tract tissues from rats treated neonatally with capsaicin and littermate controls were assayed with the r-CGRP and total CGRP assays (Fig. 1). In the control animals, concentrations determined by the r-CGRP assay wcrc comparable to those reported previously.” Concentrations detected by the total CGRP assay in several regions of the small and large intestines and also in the pancreas were significantly higher than those detected by the r-CGRP assay. In capsaicin-treated animals, little or no CGRP-LI was detected by the r-CGRP assay in any region of the alimentary tract while substantial concentrations could still be detected by the total CGRP assay in all regions apart from the oesophagus and stomach. The reduction in total CGRP-LI seen in capzaicin-treated animals compared to controls. was similar in magnitude to the concentration ol C‘GRP-LI detected by the r-CGRP assay in control animals.
.I (pmol g wet wt) In the Fig. I. Concentrations of C alimentary tract and pancreas of normal control rats (stlppled bars) and rats treated neonatallq with capsaicln (open bars) determined by radioimmunoas~ay of tlssuc extract\ with the z-CGRP assay (panel A) and the total CGRP assa\ (panel B). Values are mean 3 S.E.M for fibe rats in each group. Asterisks (*) on capsaicin group bars Indicate mcitn\
significantly different from mean of correspondlnp control group (P < 0 05. Student’s r-test for unpaired data). A\terisks on total CGRP control group bars Indicate meanr significantly dllrerent from mean of corresponding r-C‘GRP control group (P < 0.05. Student‘s I-test for palred Jat;cI
as determined hy radio86 i 8%. respectively (mean + S.E.M.. four runs each). immunoassay Under the conditions employed. 90% of the rccovered r-CGRP immunoreactivity was elutcd in the period l9-24min. peak at 21 min. and 90”#,, of the recovered /I-CGRP immunoreactivity was elutcd in the period 17-33 min, peak at 79 min. When rat tissue extracts were run on the cation exchange column. peaks corresponding to r-CGRP and /I-CGRP could be identified both from their positions on the profile and from their immunoreactikc characteristics in the assays. Thus, assay of column fractions ulth the total CGRP assay produced profiles with peak\ corresponding to X-CGRP and /j-CGRP while the [I-CGRP peak was absent from profiles produced bb the r-CGRP assay (Fig. 2). The r-CGRP peak consistently
Recoveries from
the
of synthetic r-CGRP and /I-CGRP cation exchange column were 95 + h”/b and
appeared
larger
on
profiles
produced
by the total CGRP assay than on those produced the r-CGRP assay and for intestinal extract\ capsaicin-trcdted
rats
(Fig.
3E.
F).
the
total
hq ol
<‘<;RP
19X
I?
750 -A 500
K.
ML:LDI:KKY
CI
rd.
7 ‘i
-t
250
-
.J-l”+-J-
250
n
A-L
20 Retention
Time
90
60
(minutes)
Fig. 2. Representative cation exchange-radioimmunoassay profiles of CGRP-LI in extracts of normal rat dorsal root ganglia (A, B); normal rat colon (C, D) and colon from capsaicin-treated rats (E, F). Each pair of profiles is from the same set of column fractions assayed either with the total CGRP assay (A, C, E) or with the a-CGRP assay (B, D, F). Arrows indicate the position on the profiles corresponding to the peaks produced by synthetic rat a-CGRP and synthetic rat p-CGRP.
cation exchange profile showed a peak in the position corresponding to a-CGRP where none was present on the profile produced by the a-CGRP assay. The cc-CGRP assay detected some material at the beginning of the cation exchange run which did not react in the total CGRP assay. To confirm the identities of the immunoreactive peaks on the cation exchange profiles, fractions were individually re-chromatographed on Sephadex G-50 superfine gel permeation columns eluted as described previously.28,29 Material detected by the total CGRP assay in the position of p-CGRP on cation exchange profiles (Fig. 2A, C, E) remained as a single component coeluted with synthetic /I-CGRP on the gel permeation column. Likewise, material detected by the a-CGRP assay in the position corresponding to sc-CGRP (Fig. 2B, D) remained as a single component coeluted with synthetic u-CGRP. Material appearing in the position of a-CGRP but reacting only in the total CGRP assay (Fig. 2E) was eluted from the gel permeation column significantly later
than the a-CGRP and P-CGRP standards indicating that it was of smaller molecular size than authentic a-CGRP. Although gel permeation chromatography did not resolve a-CGRP-like material detected by the total CGRP assay on cation exchange profiles of extracts from normal rats (Fig. 2A, C) into two components, we presume that the presence of this small molecular form accounts for the larger size of the a-CGRP peak seen on cation exchange profiles when assayed with the total CGRP assay than with the a-CGRP assay and that resolution on the gel permeation column was not adequate to separate this component from authentic a-CGRP. Therefore, for the purpose of estimating relative concentrations of a-CGRP and fl-CGRP in tissue extracts (Table 1, column 3), authentic a-CGRP was defined as immunoreactivity detected by the a-CGRP assay and eluted from the cation exchange column in the period 19-24 min while authentic j?-CGRP was defined as immunoreactivity detected by the total CGRP assay and eluted from the cation exchange column in the
I.
Table
Analysis
of CARP-like
immunoreactivlty
I
111rat ~ISSW\
z
x-C<;RP-LI
Total
3 Ratlo
CGRP-LI
pmol g
pm01 g
540.5 * 70.4 520.4 + hS.5
14x. I i 90.0 574.7 * 30.0
0 29 0.25
10.1 6.3 5Y.X 2Y.7 24.7 6.0 9.6 IX.7 I .z 0.6 lY.7 X0X.5
12.6 & 2 0 75*0x 64.71 II 5 31.5 Il.7 2x.‘) * 7 x 14.4* I.$ s4.3 i 5.4 54.4 & 4. I 3x.4 z s 0 42.3 i 4 3 21.X * I.7 69X.3 _t 14x.4
0.31 0.27 0. I7 0.27 0 2x 0 52 7 I3 3.70 i x0 > 30 0. I5 0 3x
& * & i * * 2 * * & i _t
1.2 0.5 9.4 3.3 3 7 0.7 1.5 1.6 0.x 0 4 1.4 160.5
/I-C‘GRP
A‘GRP
<‘olumn\ I and 2 show ahsolutc concentrations of C
detected by r -C‘GRP and total CCiRP radioimmunoassays m rat tissues suhsequcntly \uhjected to cation exchange analysis. Valuer are m pmol;g wet ht. mean i S.E.M. for IO rata each. C‘olumn 3 shows the ratios of /LCGRP to r-CC;RP. calculated from rclatlvc cluantities of authentic /KGRP and z-CCRP recovered from the callon ertchanpc \ystcm for each tissue. Values arc means of two indepcndcnt experiments uvng pooled extracts from five animals in each cast’. All result\ arc for tissue\ taken from normal rats except capGcin ileum and c~,psaun colon uhlch are for tlrsucs taken Irom rats treated with capsaun as neonarc$. Rcco\ery of C‘GRP-LI from all cation exchange runs ranged from 71 to 104%,.
period
27 32 min. Gel permeation
ofmatcrial
detected by the x-CGRP
~olumc
the cation
of
exchange
chromatography
rats are shown in Fig. 2. CGRP-LI
assay in the void
sensory neurons of the dorsal root gangha consisted
profile
this comprised the two carhoxy-terminal previously
FC‘GRP
Cation used
to
Y-CGRP
exchange
radioimmunoassay
compare
the
and /KGRP
sensor)
with
tlssucs
relative
normal
capsaicln-treated
analysis was
concentrations
ih localized
the
and /I-CGRP of
colon. distinct peaks corresponding
ol
in the sensory ganglia and in
CGRP-LI
libres
primarily
fragments of
described.“’
tissues where r-CGRP
showed that
relative
primarily
to
concentrations
of
in intestinal
rats
and
and pancreatic
intestinal
rats. Normal
tissues
of
rat brain and thyroid
concentrations
of
CGRP-LI
in
the
(Fig.
IA,
dnd /I-CGRP
were apparent
tissues from
capsaicin-treated
the
predominant
and
little
(Fig.
2E. F).
or
The
summarl/ed
of
all
in Table
1. column
the
the r-CGRP
tissue hut,
were
for tissues other
than pancreas. ileum and 1. columns
I ant1 2). For cation exchange analysis. a sufficient quantity of
each
type
of
tissue extract
loading so that approximately I.1 wus loaded detection
prepared
for
on each run. The effective threshold of
for assay of cation
approximately rcsentative
was
1-~3 pmol total CGRPexchange fractions
10 fmol CGRP-LI
cation
exchange
per fraction.
profiles
of
was Rcp-
from normal rat dorsal root ganglia, from normal colon and from
colonic
root ganglia. bladder
inant
and
similar. was
rat
tissues of capsaicin-treated
was
P-CGRP quantities
z-CARP
of /I-CGRP
form.
still
to
thyroid
mRNA
could gland.
ileal
but
where
lung?
prcdon-
z-C’GRP
were
/I-(.‘(;RP
and
colonic
rats.
authcnttc
no
jlgnificant
be detected.
has prcvlously
was present.
than _*-CGRP.
In
present.
heart. uas
howeccr.
capsaicin-treated
of z-CGRP
and
and /I-(‘GRP
dorsal spinal cord.
predominant from
from
h> calculating
rat tissues cxa~mincd. In
stomach.
the ratios
the
/I-CGRP
and
;I\
to authentic z-(‘GRP.
In the ileum and colon,
tissues
brain
The rc\ults
of both r-C‘<;RP
in all normal
skin,
/J-CGRP
CARP-LI
quantities
present
dorsal
calculated characterization
immunoreactivity”)
tratlony
colon. the difference was not great (Table
and /i-(‘GRP
were
runs were then normalilcd
Significant
assay in the corresponding
3. For each run. the
column
the ratio of authentic /I-CCiRP
radio-
in rat ti\sucs XC
2-C‘GRP
assay generally
WII,
C‘CiRP-I.1
cxchungc
described above (“Chromatographlc individual
rat
U;I\ cictected
cation
total C GRP than
of
r-C‘GRP
different tissues studied varied over a wide range. The detected higher conccn-
/I-CGRP
form
of authentic
from
the
to both r-CGRP
analyses of CGRP-LI
total quantities recovered
H). In normal
rats.
molecular
results
immunoassay
in
(Fig. ?C. D). In colonlc
no authentic
of CGRP-like
were also studied. Absolute
of x-CGRP
present
the
In normal prcvzncc
been demonstrated.
but at Ioucr
conccntratlon\
01
Fig. 3. (A) Northern blot hybridization 01 “P-labelled, GICGRP- and @-CGRP-specific cDNA probes (as indicated) to total cellular RNA extracted from rat dorsal root ganglia (lane 1) and from rat intestine (lane 2). (B) In situ hybridization autoradiograph of 35S-labelled, fl-CGRP-specific complementary RNA probe to section of rat colon showing labelling of neurons in the submucous plexus (arrowed). The section was counterstained with haemotoxylin. MG indicates mucosal glands (crypts); MM indicates muscutaris mucosae. (C) In situ hybridization autoradiograph of “P-labelled, p-CGRP-specific cRNA probe to section of rat colon showing intense labelling’of neurons in both submucous and myenteric plexuses (arrowed). Background labelfing in muscularis mucosae (MM) and muscularis externa (MP) was nonspecific (see Experimental Procedures). Scale bars = 25 ,~m. X0
r-CGRP NortIwrn
h/o/
and /I-CGRP
in sensory
and enteric
nerves
100
hyhridizurion
establish whether r-CGRP and [j-CGRP are synthesized locally within the sensory ganglia and enteric nerve plexuses, the occurrence of rl-CGRP and [j-CGRP mRNAs was studied in these tissues. Total cellular RNA from dorsal root ganglia and intestine was analysed by the technique of Northern blotting which enables detection of specific mRNA sequences. Northern blot hybridization of RNA cxtractcd from rat intestine revealed the presence of a single species of RNA hybridizing to the [I-CGRP probe. No r-CGRP RNA was detected in the intestint. Northern blot hybridization of RNA extracted from dorsal root ganglia showed the presence of one species of RNA hybridizing to the r-CGRP probe and one hybridizing to the /j-CGRP probe (Fig. 3A). To
50 ._? u ._SI a ._v k u
0
In .c’,tu hybridization experiments were used to determlnc the precise localization of p-CGRP mRNA within the intestinal wall. Hybridization of the ITS- and “P-labclled cRNA probes for /I-CGRP to rat colonic sections produced an intense. selective labelling, directly localized to the submucous and myentcric plexuses (Fig. 3B. C). Pretreatment of scctlonc with ribonuclease resulted in a substantial reduction of labelling. There was no specific labelling of either the submucous or myenteric plexuses when the r-(‘GRP cRNA probe was used nor when noncomplementary control probes were used. -9
-11
Incubation of radiolabelled r-CGRP or /I’-CGRP with r;lt heart and colon membranes resulted in blnding of 2&5’% of the tracer. Non-specific binding, defined as that remaining in the presence of a IOOO-fold molar excess of unlabelled ligand, was typically 3@~50% of total radioligand binding. This level of non-specific binding is comparable to that obscrvcd by others for binding of radiolabelled r-CGRP to rat heart membranes.” Dose-response curves for the displacement of radiolabelled rat r-CGRP and /I-CGRP from rat colonic membranes by unlabclled r-CGRP and [$-CGRP arc shown in Fig. 4. No consistent difference was observed in the ability of unlabelled sc-CGRP or fl-CGRP to displace clther radioligand from membrane binding sites. Similar- results were obtained using heart membranes. The concentrations of unlabelled peptides required to
Log Fig. 4. Displacement
concentration
Displacing Heart Colon
ligand:
of radlolabelled rat r-CGRP rat [K’GRP (loner panel). each at a concentration of 0.1 nM. from receptor binding sites on membranes of rat colon by increasing concentrations of unlabelled rat r-CGRP (open circles) and unlabelled rat [j-CGRP (closed circles). Each point IS the mean result of three independent experiments each performed in duplicate. Curves are drawn for displacement of %-CGRP tracer ligand by unlabelled r-CGRP and for displacement of [KGRP tracer ligand by unlabelled /KGRP.
produce r-CGRP
curves
half-maximal displacement of radiolabelled and /j-CGRP are given in Table 2.
The effects of r-CGRP and p-CGRP on spontaneous contractions of rat atrium and relaxation of
[‘Z51]~-CGRP z-CGRP
/I-CGRP
0.68 iO.08 0.66 f 0.09
Each value is mean f S.E.M.
! M)
(upper panel) and radiolabelled
Table 2. Concentrations of unlabelled a-CGRP and /I-CGRP (nM) required to produce half-maximal displacement of z-CGRP and /I-CGRP tracer ligands (0.1 nM) from membranes of rat heart and colon
Tracer ligand:
-7
0.86iO.03 0.77 * 0.21
for three duplicate
[“‘I]/KGRP z(-CGRP 0.67 10.24 0.74 * 0.09 experiments.
[KGRP 0.98 kO.36 0.66 * 0. IO
“, Force
Increased_,
I net-ea*e
Rate
60 -
)
(min
B / t t
/ I/
40 -
20 $4
b/
OI
1
1o-g
I-
7
lo-*
1o-g
10 -8
1o-g
lo-*
lo-’
,
1
CCRP
(molll)
Fig. 5. Dose-response curve for rat c(-CGRP (open circles) and rat P-CGRP (closed circles) causing (A) increased force and (B) increased rate of spontaneous contractions in rat isolated atrium and (C) relaxation of rat colonic longitudinal smooth muscle. Values are mean f S.E.M. from IO experiments (heart) and 16 experiments (colon).
rat colonic longitudinal muscle are shown in Fig. 5. The two peptides were equipotent in causing increased rate and force of atrial contractions. While both I-CGRP and /?-CGRP caused relaxation of colonic muscle, there was a modest but nevertheless significant difference in their relative potencies. a-CGRP being 2.6 times more potent than /j-CGRP, the 95% confidence limits being 2.c3.4. DISCUSSION
Our primary aim in this study was to compare the relative levels of expression of a-CGRP and b-CGRP in the sensory and enteric nervous systems of the rat. The use of rddioimmunoassays of differing specificity to analyse CGRP-LI in normal rat tissues has shown that in the intestine, the concentrations of CGRP-LI found depend very much on the epitopic specificity of the antiserum used. Furthermore, in rats treated neonatally with capsaicin the cr-CGRP assay detected little or no CGRP-LI in the intestine, while substantial quantities were still detected by the total CGRP assay in which /I-CGRP cross-reacts. Cation cxchange analysis showed that while CGRP-LI in the
sensory ganglia was composed prtmarily 01’r-C‘GRP. the intestines of normal rats contained substantial quantities of both cc-CGRP and P-CGRP. In the intestines of capsaicin-treated rats, /j-CtiRP was present but authentic cc-CGRP was not. A small quantity of immunoreactive material which behaved like a-CGRP on cation exchange chromatography was detected but this was of significantly smaller molecular size than !x-CGRP and did not react in the a-CGRP assay. This moiety could not be positively identified. The extrinsic site of synthesis of rntestinal cc-CGRP was confirmed by analysis of cr-CGRP and fi-CGRP mRNAs which showed that only /j-CGRP mRNA is present in the intestine where it is localized to enteric neurons. Both r-CGRP and /I-CGRP mRNAs were detected in the dorsal root ganglia. The specificity of capsaicin in causing permanent degeneration of a population of primary afferent neurons when administered to neonatal rats is well documented (see references 3, 9 and 31 for reviews) and enteric neurons are apparently unaffected by capsaicin, at least with respect to peptidc content.” WC have established. therefore that CGRPimmunoreactive autonomic neurons of the cnteric nervous system express fi-CGRP and that r-CGRP in the intestines of normal rats is prcscnt in the extrinsic capsaicin-sensitive sensory fibres. The rcsuits of experiments reported by Sternini c’f rrl.,*” in which radioimmunoassay and reverse-phase chromatography were used to analyse and compare CGRP-LI in the intestines of normal and capsaicintreated rats have suggested that the major molecular form of CGRP-LI is the same in both the extrinsic sensory and intrinsic ncrvcs. However, separation ol X-CGRP and /J-CGRP by reverse-phase criteria is minimal (P. K. Mulderry. unpublished observations), so failure to effectively separate r-CGRP and /j-CGRP may explain the apparent contrast vvith the results of the present study. Previous immunocytochcmical studies have cstablished that CGRP-immunorractive ncrvc librcs can bc found throughout the alimentary tract and pancreas while ncuronal cell bodies can bc stained in the Capsaicin treatment intestine. ih7iO.li.,~.‘I.??.~X.ll.l~iX.ll).JI or surgical lesion of the atrerent nerve supply lead to a reduction of CGRP-LI concentrations and a rcduclion in the number of CGRP-immunoreactivc times in all parts of the alimentary tract but do not affect the number of CGRP-immunoreactivc ncuronal cell Thus while bodies in the intestine. hii~.i~.~~.L~.~X.~~.~~~.~~ CGRP-immunorcactivc extrinsic sensory ner\cs arc present throughout the alimentary tract. (‘GRPimmunoreactivc enteric neurons are restricted to the small and large intestines. The results of the immunochcmical analysis in the present study correlate well with thcsc findings since the capsaicinresistant //-CGRP present in the intestine did not extend to the stomach or ocsophagus. In the present study. low concentrations of capsaicin-resistant CGRP-LI wcrc found In the pan-
crcas
to extrinsic
intrinsic
CGRP
ascertained
of
that
/i-C<;RP r-CGRP
and
p-CGRP
neurons
i\
associated
with
for
present
thcreforc.
forms
in that
of CGRP
In tissues
sensory
ganglia
RNAs
both
but
where CGRP-
tibrcs.
study.
To
produce
rat heart that
unlahelled
of binding
to heart
i.c.
unknown the method
of
indicating
by either pcptldcs
modest.
was
whether
this
nant but /i-CARP
could
of
that
arc transported
both
peptidcs
cell hodie\ Whether
to their r-CGRP
distinct
and
populations
cstahlishcd. hraln
of
or
thyroid
suggcstcd
that
cxpresscd rcmainz
unknown
so
cells
in
r-CGRP studies
of /i-CGRP
sonic
in scvcral
motoncurons
may
aim
cxpcriments
c\-
cranial
prefcren-
The the
present
rat
/i-CXiRP
can
colo@c;illy ditYcrcnt studies
another
the
WC could existence
find sites
th
with and
of rat
could
\
aluo\
in
r-CGRP
half-
r-CGRP
bc achic\cd nM. in
In to rat
that
rat
at 0.35
obtained
MI-
of any
significantly
1’1 I//. found
r-CGRP
ol
/j-CGRP.
of radiolabellcd
mcmhranex
their
pharma
via cxprcssion
r-CARP
Sigrijt
displacement
of
the
in the
uhich
is
prcscnt
has
system
;I
01‘ the
althou$
to he dctcrmincd
from
difrcrcnt
cflic,~c~c\
lebcl or from
by en/!
111~s
~omc
well
;I\
prczcnt
in
function.
dilfcrent
hy
r-<‘(;RP The
results
cxperimcnts
/I-CGRP
arc
/I-CGRP.
as well
ilS ;I
lar from
probably as
ncurotransmittcr physiological r-CGRP,
Icntcric
ncrvou5
which the
suggest
rccclltor
handing \imil:tr.
lx
may
of
/i-C‘GRP.
hc as ;I ncur~,transmittsr
s;\steni.
and
and ThuS.
c\pcctcd IO act
or ncuromodIil~itor. function
C‘Y-
h;~\c hccn
r-(‘GRP
that
ma>
and
pi-cfcrcntiallv
functionall>
r-CGRP.
tn
dihtlnct
ncuron5
rcspecti\,cly.
of
,I
IL+O ~IO\CI!
and /i-(‘(;RP.
scllsor)
/I-CARP
bioassa)
<‘GRP-I
the
Furthcrmorc.
i.e.
neurons.
or
that
x-CGRP
genes.
popul~ilions. autonomic
shown comprisa
neuropcptides.
Idontifcd.
and
whether
or colon
on the binding
to
or
production
cvidcnce
hlnding
pr-csenc~ of unl;thcllcd c~mparahlc
r-CGRP
no
for
splcn~c
whether
study
nervous
homologous ncuronal
bloassaq
in the heart
rcccptor
membranes.” r;lt
and
compounds
atfinities study
mar~m;~l I‘rom
tlic
binding
indcpcndcntly
rcpresentr
gcncs.
01‘
ticsuc
act
dctcrminc
equivalent
liti-
ditfcrcnt
to
bioassay.
to receptor
cncodcd cntcric
receptor
the
was
occurI-c‘ncc
clasS
of‘
in clicitlny
<‘ON(‘I.I SKIN
press The
wcrc cntll-cl\
the tissue.
OIha\c
/i-CARP.
cxpr-css
results
of protcolysis
the
cxprcssion
expression
colon
in the
to he
cxclusivcly
the icvcl
hl
OI-
of the rcccp
clticicnt
at the receptor
unrclatcd
rates
bioassay
occupation
It remain5
diKcrcncc
is in
01‘ r-C‘C;RP
difYcrencc In potcnclcs
rat
III
whcthcl
in sirrc hybridization
of r-C’GRP
niiclei,
neurons
remains
express
Previous
motor
arc
the
the two pcptidcs
dilrcrcnt
actions
is equally
signiticant.
phenomenon
terminal\.
C<;RP-immtinorcactive
/I-U;RP. cccd~ that
/i-CGRP
it
the sensory
and peripheral
of sensory
Similarly.
populations
tiallh
central
from
suggesting
in
atEnIt> found
discrcpanq
of memhrancs The
The
was
this
of
of 5 nM
from some dilTcrencc
that
pcptidc
responhc.
spinal cord. heart. lung, bladder. skin and stomI I/ I’I~ )~~i ‘-~4:‘3, j’ r_(‘GRP WBs again predon,i_ ach. also be detected.
GIIISC
to
found
lower
than
on the rat atrium
equivalent.
t&o
The
incubation.
and /I’-CGRP
biological
dorsal
mcmhranes
of preparation
conditions
authors
significantly
a
it may result
but
thcsc
at a concentration
implying study.
cffcct on binding
howevcr,
2-CGRP
was required.
tars
the equivalent
membranes,
the present
but that some
also
both
it can bc
root
conclude.
express
of
/I-CGRP.
Messenger
prcdominatcs.
cells but
before
dorsal
wcrc WC
it is
investigation
is predominant, present.
of
that
and islet
express
from
ganglia.
that x-(‘GRP
cells
CGRP-LI also
root
sensory
nerves Further
islet
stud&
have shown
be necessary
r-CGRP
is
dorsal
will
whether
Analysis showed
sensory
ncurons.‘“.‘H42
pancreatic
Ll
histochemical
in the rat pancreas
locah~cd
not
Detailed
I ).
(I:ig.
CGRP-I,1
A parlia;I\ distinct 01‘ the
6. Costa
I. 8. 9. IO. 11. 12.
13.
14.
15. 16.
17. 18. 19
20
21
22
23. 24
25. 26. 27. 28.
29. 30.
31. 32. 33.
34.
35.
M.. Furness J. 8. and Llewellyn-Smith I. J. (1987) Histochemistry of the enteric nervous system. In I’//~,.trt&~gj qfrhe Gusrroinfesfinal Tracr (ed. Johnson L. R.). 2nd edn, pp. I-40. Raven Press. New York. Ekblad E., Winther C., Ekman R., Hakanson R. and Sundler F. (1987) Projections of peptide-containing neurons in rat small intestine. Neuroscience 20, 169-188. Feinberg A. P. and Vogelstein B. (1983) A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Analyf. Biochem. 132, h-13. Fitzgerald M. (1983) Capsaicin and sensory neurons-a review. Pain 15, 109%130. Furness J. B.. Costa M., Gibbins I. L., Llewellyn-Smith I. J. and Oliver J. R. (1985) Neurochemically similar myenteric and submucous neurons directly traced to the mucosa of the small intestine. CeN Tiss. Re.r. 241, 155--163. Ghatei M. A., Gu J., Mulderry P. K., Blank M. A., Allen J. M., Morrison J. F. B., Polak J. M. and Bloom S. R. (1985) Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the female rat urogenital tract. Peptides 6, 809 815. Ghatei M. A., Mulderry P. K., McGregor G. P., Bishop A. E. and Polak J. M. (1986) Experimental investigation of the nature of the calcitonin gene-related peptide innervation of the rat gastrointestinal tract; comparison with other enteric neuropeptides. Can J. Physiol. Phurmuc. Suppl. p, 159. Gibbins I. L., Furness J. B.. Costa M., MacIntyre I., Hillyard C. J. and Girgis S. (1985) Co-localization of calcitonin gene-related peptide like immunoreactivity with substance P in cutaneous, vascular and visceral sensory neurons of guinea pigs. Neurosci. Lerr. 57, 125 130. Gibson S. J., Polak J. M.. Bloom S. R., Sabate 1. M., Mulderry P. K., Ghatei M. A., McGregor G. P., Morrison J. F. B., Kelly J. S., Evans R. M. and Rosenfeld M. G. (1984) Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the spinal cord of man and eight other species. J. Neurosci. 4, 3101&31 Il. Green T. and Dockray G. J. (1987) Calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in afferents to the upper gastrointestinal tract in the rat. Neurosci. Le/[. 76, 151 ~156. Hamid Q,, Wharton J., Terenghi G., Hassall C. J. S., Aimi J., Taylor K. M., Nakazato H., Dixon J. E., Burnstock G. and Polak J. M. (1987) Localization of atria1 natriuretic peptide mRNA and immunoreactivity in rat and human atrial appendages. Proc. nam. Acud. Sri. U.S.A. 84, 676G-6764. Holman J. J., Craig R. K. and Marshall I. (1986) Human I- and p-CGRP and rat cr-CGRP are coronary vasodilators in the rat. Peptides 7, 231-235. Holzer P., Gamse R. and Lembeck F. (1980) Distribution of substance P in the rat gastrointestinal tract-lack of effect of capsaicin pretreatment. Eur. J. Pharmuc. 61, 303-307. Hoppcner J. W. M., Steenbergh P. H., Slebos R. J. C., Visser A., Lips C. J. M., Jansz H. S., Bechet J. M., Lenoir G. M., Born W., Haller-Brem S., Petermann J. B. and Fischer J. A. (1987) Expression of the second calcitoninicalcitonin gene-related peptide in Ewing Sarcoma cell lines. J. clin. Endocr. Metab. 64, 809-817. Ju G., Hokfelt T., Brodin E., Fahrenkrug J., Fischer J. A. Frey P., Elde R. P. and Brown J. C. (1987) Primary sensory neurons of the rat showing calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity and their relation to substance P, somatostatin, galanin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and cholecystokinin immunoreactive ganglion cells. Cell Tiss. Res. 247, 41 l-43 1. Lee Y.. Takami T., Kawai Y., Girgis S., Hillyard C. J., MacIntyre I., Emson P. C. and Tohyama M. (1985) Distribution of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the rat peripheral nervous system with reference to its co-existence with substance P. Neuroscience 15, 1227-1231. Lee Y., Shiotani Y., Hayashi N., Kamada T., Hillyard C. J., Girgis S. I., MacIntyre I. and Tohyama M. (1987) Distribution and origin of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the rat stomach and duodenum: an immunocytochemical analysis. J. Neural Transm. 68, l--14. Lehrach H.. Diamond D., Wozney J. M. and Boedtker H. (1977) RNA molecular weight determination by gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions a critical re-examination. Biochemistry 16, 47433475 1. Lundberg J. M., France-Cereceda A., Hua X., Hokfelt T. and Fischer J. A. (1985) Co-existence of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide-like immunoreactivities in sensory nerves in relation to cardiovascular and bronchoconstrictor effects of capsaicin. Eur. J. Pharmuc. 108, 315-319. Maniatis T., Fritsch E. F. and Sambrook J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. p. 196. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. Op. cii., Ref. 25, pp. 326328. Mulderry P. K., Nicholl C. G., Ghatei M. A., Springall D. R., Polak J. M. and Bloom S. R. (1984) Distribution and possible dual role of CGRP-containing nerves in the skin of the rat. Regul. Pepf. 9, 341. Mulderry P. K., Ghatei M. A., Bishop A. E., Allen Y. S., Polak J. M. and Bloom S. R. (1985) Distribution and chromatographic characterisation of CGRP-like immunoreactivity in the brain and gut of the rat, Regul. Pepr. 12, 133m-143. Mulderry P. K., Ghatei M., A., Rodrigo J., Allen J. M., Rosenfeld M. G., Polak J. M. and Bloom S. R. (1985) Calcitonin gene-related peptide in cardiovascular tissues of the rat. Neuroscience 14, 947-954. Mulderry P. K., Ghatei M. A. and Bloom S. R. (1987) In oirro production and characterisation of low molecular weight forms of calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity from rat thyroid. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 144, 8833890. Nagy J. I. (1982) Capsaicin a chemical probe for sensory neuron mechanisms. In Handbook of Psychophurmuco/ogy (eds Iversen L. L.. Iversen S. D. and Snvder S. H.), Vol. 15. DD. 185.-235. Plenum Press. New York. Paton W. D. M. and Zar M. A. (1968). The origin of acetylcholine released from guinea pig’intestine and longitundinal muscle strips. J. Physiol. Land. 194, 13-33. Petermann J. B., Born W., Chang J-Y. and Fischer J. A. (1987) Identification in the human central nervous system, pituitary and thyroid of a novel calcitonin gene-related peptide and partial amino acid sequence in the spinal cord. J. biol. Chem. 262, 542-545. Rodrigo J., Polak J. M., Fernandez L., Ghatei M. A., Mulderry P. K. and Bloom S. R. (1985) Calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunoreactivity sensory and motor nerves of the rat, cat and monkey esophagus. Gasfroenterology 88, 444451. Rosenfeld M. G., Mermod J. J., Amara S. G., Swanson L. W., Sawchenko P. E., Rivier J., Vale W. W. and Evans R. M. (1983) Production of a novel neuropeptide encoded by the calcitonin gene via tissue-specific RNA processing. Nafure 304, 1299135.
x-CGRP
and P-CARP
m wnsory
and cntcrlc ncrvt‘~
71)5