Direct Inhibitory Effect of Hemicholinium-No. 3 on Acetylcholine Release

Direct Inhibitory Effect of Hemicholinium-No. 3 on Acetylcholine Release

DIRECT INHIBITORY No. Fumiaki 3 ON HATA, EFFECT OF HEMICHOLINIUM ACETYLCHOLINE Tomohiro RELEASE MATSUDA and Hiroshi YOSHIDA Department o...

164KB Sizes 0 Downloads 58 Views

DIRECT

INHIBITORY No.

Fumiaki

3 ON

HATA,

EFFECT

OF

HEMICHOLINIUM

ACETYLCHOLINE

Tomohiro

RELEASE

MATSUDA

and Hiroshi

YOSHIDA

Department of Pharmacology I, Osaka University School of Medicine, Kita-kit , Osaka, Japan Accepted February

It is well known choline

was demonstrated of choline hibits

that hemicholinium

(ACh) in both central

that the reduced

into neuronal

uptake

(1-7)

synthesis

of ACh in the presence

a direct inhibitory

3 (HC-3) reduces

and peripheral

cells (7, 11-13).

findings suggest that HC-3 reduces ducing the ACh content

No.

24, 1975

the synthesis

(1, 8-10) nervous

of ACh was due to inhibition It was also found

of an inhibitor

However,

It

of the transport

that in brain slices HC-3 in

of cholinesterase

the release of ACh from nervous

of nervous tissue.

of acetyl

tissues in vitro.

(14, 15).

These

tissue indirectly

by re

in this study HC-3 was found to have

effect on the release of ACh from brain slices under certain experimental

conditions. Sprague-Dawley

strain rats, weighing

and then chilled in cold Krebs Ringer. KCI,

1.34 mM

MgSO4,

10 mM glucose.

1.34 mM

In experiments

the lateral surface. suspended

CaCl2, 20 mM

using a Stadie-Rigg's The slices (about

in 4 ml of Krebs Ringer,

Ringer with or without ing 90 mM NaCl

were decapitated,

sodium

phosphate

on the effect of anticholinesterase,

was added to the Krebs Ringer solution. brain hemisphere

200-300g

The Krebs Ringer contained

Three cerebral slicer:

cortex

the brains

134 mM NaG, buffer,

removed 5.4 mM

pH 7.4 and

25 1 M eserine sulfate slices were cut from each

two from the apical surface and one from

160-200 mg wt.) were weighed on a torsion and then preincubated

balance,

at 37'C for 30 min in Krebs

eserine sulfate, or in a medium of high. K+ concentration

and 50 mM KCI and other ions at the same concentrations

contain

as in Krebs

SHORT Ringer.

After rinsing

COMMUNICATIONS

with cold Krebs

for 20 min with 4 ml of medium 20 1cM HC-3 was added

Ringer

Japan. J. Pharmacol. 25, 355 (1975) the slices were incubated

of high K+ concentration.

to the incubation

25 1 M eserine sulfate

supernatant

was neutralized

frog rectus muscle by the method cholinesterase Microsomal

(AChE) fraction

activity obtained

tion and it was preincubated

and boiled

with NaOH

at 37'C

medium.

For assay of total ACh of the slices, they were homogenized containing

further

To test the effect of HC-3,

with 5 ml of Frog Ringer

at pH 4.0 for 10 min and centrifuged.

and then the ACh concentration

of Chang

and Gaddum

was carried out according from rat brain homogenate with or without

inhibitors

(16).

was assayed

Measurement

to the procedure

on

of acetyl

of Hestrin

was used as the enzyme

The

(17).

prepara

at 37'C for 20 min.

FIG. 1. (A) Effects of high K ion concentration on ACh release from slices pre incubated with or without eserine. (B) Effects of high K ion concentration in presence of HC-3 on ACh release from slices preincubated with or without eserine. ------Krebs Ringer, -•-•-•-•-• Krebs Ringer containing eserine , High K+ medium Values are means -S.D. and the numbers of experiments are shown in brackets.

SHORT There were significant incubated normal

in Krebs Krebs

increases

Ringer

Ringer

Japan. J. Pharrnacol. 25, 356 (1975)

in the amount

containing

medium

Birks and MacIntosh and of Potter

COMMUNICATIONS

(Fig.

of ACh in the slices, which were pre

25 /-tM eserine 1, A).

sulfate

This finding

in comparison

is in agreement

(8) and of Collier and Katz (18) using cat's superior

(10) using the nerve diaphragm

preparation.

The extra

to value

on

with results

of

cervical ganglion ACh accumulated

by presence of AChE inhibitor such as eserine or tetraethylpyrophosphate was termed "Surplus ACh" b y Birks and MacIntosh (8). On the other hand, high K' concentration is widely known to cause a release of ACh from the brain slices resulting in a reduction of ACh content

in the slice.

tion of ACh content

Effect of HC-3 was examined

in the slices preincubated

As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, reduction slices preincubated But its reduction

in normal

ACh" by preincubation (P<0.01). ACh"

in medium

Our results,

were transferred

of HC-3

Krebs

shown

influence

containing

that

influenced

by

by HC-3

"Surplus in presence

--S.D.,

This effect of HC-3 cannot be explained

HC-3.

significantly

was higher

slices, mean

from

"Surplus

when slices containing

their ACh content ACh/g

of eserine.

had accumulated

eserine was depressed

1, indicate

(8.8-1-1.6 m,amoles

in presence by its known

on ACh synthesis.

As the higher ACh content an inhibitory

of slices which

to high K+ medium,

than in its absence

and absence

reduc

by high K' concentration

was not significantly

content

in Fig.

of HC-3 and 6.5 + 1.8 in its absence). inhibitory

in the presence

of ACh content

Ringer

by K+ in the ACh

here on the K+-induced

of slices in the presence

effect of HC-3 on AChE activity,

rat brain microsomes

was examined.

be due to

the influence of HC-3 on AChE activity

As shown

described

of HC-3 might possibly

in Table 1, HC-3 slightly inhibited

of

AChE.

However,

in the experiments

Therefore,

even if HC-3 readily enters the brain slices (19) it seems unlikely that the higher

level of ACh in the slices observed the weak inhibitory has no significant on uptake

effect on activity

of an increase

of choline

of HC-3 is due to

it is kno%vn that

HC-3

(2) and an inhibitory

effect

are

represented

inhibitors.

of the slices.

A more

release of ACh from

th

likely explanation so-called

"Surplus

In the small intestine also, HC-3 has been shown to inhibit

TABLE 1. Inhibition

Data

acetyltransferase

in ACh content it may inhibit

in the brain slices.

without

of this concentration

On the other hand

into brain slices (7, 11-13), but these effects of 1-IC-3 do not indicate

of the effect of HC-3 is that ACh Pool"

in the presence

effect of HC-3 on AChE.

of choline

the possibility

above on release of ACh, 20 ,uM HC-3 was used.

as per

of AChE by HC-3 or eserine.

cent

of

inhibition

to

enzyme

activity

SHORT spontaneous

COMMUNICATIONS

and stretch-induced

The nature the cytoplasm. of "Surplus

of "Surplus

ACh"

release

is not clear, but it may represent

ACh" may be a carrier mediated with uptake

HC-3 (14, 15).

Several

mulation

release

workers

of "Surplus

physiological

tion increased

ACh in a free form in

transmembrane

transport

postulate

ACh"

significances,

release of "Surplus

(21-23)

having by

that the ACh in the pool available

for

form in the synaptic

which was inhibited there

release

to be inhibited

not a bound

though

by HC-3,

phenomenon,

of ACh by the slices which is also known

release is in a free form in the cytoplasm,

important

of ACh (20).

If this is so and if its release from the slices is inhibited

a close relation

this meaning,

Japan. J. Pharmacol. 25, 357 (1975)

by HC-3

is a report

ACh" from the sympathetic

vesicles.

In

may have rather

that

high K+ concentra

ganglion

while electrical

sti

did not (18).

REFERENCES 1) MACINTOSH,F.C., BIRKS, R.I. AND SASTRY,P.B.: Nature 178, 1181 (1956); 2) GARDINER, J.E.: Blochem. J., 81, 297 (1961); 3) BHATNAGAR,S.P. AND MACINTOSH,F.C.: Canad. J. Phy siol. Pharmacol. 45, 249 (1967); 4) SLATER,P.: Int. J. Neuropharmacol., 7, 421 (1968); 5) BROWNING,E.T. AND SCHULMAN,M.P.: J. Neurochemn. 15, 1391 (1968); 6) MARCHBANKS, R.M.: Biochem. Pharmacol. 18, 1763 (1969); 7) GUYENET,P., LEFRESNE,P., ROSSIER,J., BEAU JOUAN,J.C. AND GLOWINSKI,J.: Mol. Pharmacol. 9, 630 (1973); 8) BIRKS, R.I. AND MAC INTOSH,F.C.: Canad..1. Biochem. PhysioL 39, 787 (1961) 9) COLLIER,B. AND MACINTOSH,F.C.: Canal. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 47, 127 (1969); 10) POTTER,L.T.: J. Physiol. 206,145 (1970); 11) SCHUBERTH, J., SUNDWALL,A., SoRBO, B. ANDLINDELL,J-O.: J. Neurochem. 13, 347 (1966); 12) MARCHBANKs,R.M.,: Biochem. J. 110, 533 (1968); 13) YAMAMURA,H.I. AND SNYDER,S.H.: J. Neuro(-hem. 21, 1355 (1973); 14) SCHUBERTH,J. AND SUNDWALL,A.: J. Neurochem. 14, 807 (1967); 15) PoLAK, R.L.: Brit..I. Pharmacol. 36, 144 (1969); 16) CHANG, H.C. ANDGADDUM, J.H.: J. Physiol. 79, 255 (1933); 17) HESTRIN,S.: J. biol. Chem. 180, 249 (1949); 18) COL LIER,B. AND KATZ, H.S.: J. Physiol. 214, 537 (1971); 19) SLATER,P. AND STONIER,P.D.: J. Neurochem. 20, 637 (1973); 20) YAGASAKI,0., TAKFWAKi,T., UTSUMI, S. AND YANAGIYA, I.: Fo!ia Pharmacol. Japon. 65, 171§ (1969) (in Japanese); 21) WHITTAKER,V.P.: Prog. Brain Res. 31, 211 (1969); 22) RICHTER,J.A. AND MARCHBAKNS, R.M.: J. Neurochem. 18, 691 (1971); 23) RICHTER,J.A. AND MARCHBANKS,R.M.: J. Neurochem. 18, 705 (1971)