DIRECTION FINDING OF CHORUS EMISSIONS IN THE OUTER MAGNETOSPHERE AND THEIR GENERATION AND PROPAGATION M. HAYAKAWA
Research
Institute
of Atmospluxics,
Nagoya
and K. HATTORI
University, 442, Japan
13 tIonohara
Scheme,
Toyokawa.
Aichi.
S. SHI~AK~IRA
Department of Electrical Engineering.
Chiba
University.
33 Yayoi
I-chome,
fhihn,
260, Japan
and M. PAKROT
Lahoratoire
de Physique
and F. LEFEUVRE
et Chimic de I’Environncment.
CNRS,
45071 Orleans Ccdex 2. France
Abstract-The GEU.5’ I satellite wave data have been used to determine the wave normal directions of chorus emissions in the o~r-~qu~itori~l region (~e~~Il~~~netic latitude - 17 ) of the outer rn~~n~t~)sph~r~ based on the direction linding of the wave distrihuti[~n function method. The local time and f. shell of the data analysed are L.T. s IO h and I_ - 7.60, respectively. and only one event is estensively studied. There are two frequency bands of emissions: one above and the other below one half the electron gyrofrequency, hut the latter is the dominant emission and is investtgated here. Two types ofchorus are dealt with; rising tones and impulsive ones. About 90% of chorus emissions nnalyscrd are found to be composed of a single plane wave, which is in contrast to plxsmasphcric hiss. Thcrc is no conspicuous relationship hctween (I (the angle of wave normal dircclion with respect to the Earth’s magnetic ficld) and frequency for rising tones, and their OS take larger values in a range of 30 55 , wjhercas a tendency seems to appear, for an impulsive chorus. for waves at higher frequencies to travel at a larger angle to the field. The wave normal directions ohservcd have been discussed as functions ofwave frequency normalized by the local electron gyrofrcquency and the slope of an emission, d/;‘&. A comparison of the present results on the o&equatorial w;\vc normal directions with the previous equatorial direction linding results have made it possible to discuss the tneneration and pr(~~~~lti~)ll nle~h~lnislll ofchorus emissions with diKerent structures includin& rising tones. falling tones. constant frequency tones and impulsive (burstlike) ones. and finally we have pointed out future work for investigation
1. INTRODUC’TION
Chorus emissions are one of the most intense naturally occurring clectromagnctic signals dctccted in the outer magnetosphere. Chorus is observed near the equatorial plane mainly outside the pl~~slnap~~use and occurs during geomagnetic substorms and storms (Tsurutani and Smith. 1974; Burtis and Helliwell. 1976; Anderson and Macda, 1977; Thornc L’I rrl., 1977: Tsurutani and Smith, 1977; Hayakawa cr cd., 1977, 1984, 1986; Tsurutani rf cl/., 1979; Goldstein and Tsurutani. 1984). Tsurutani and Smith (I 977) and Hayakawa et ul. (1986) have studied the delay time of emissions from the onset of the substorm and have dcduccd the energy (IO-100 keV) of resonant electrons. They have also shown that the chorus ln~~xilnll[~l occurs from the local time (L.T.) 1 6610 h and suggested that the mechanism may bc associated with the upflow of thermal plasmas from the sunlit
ionosphere. A further correlation of emission generation with hot (IO-100 kcV). anisotropic electron clouds has been investigated by Anderson and Macda (1977), Tsurutani et al. (1979) and Isenbcrg c’t cd. (1987). Hence. the wave generation is the loss cone instability (Kennel and Petschek, 1966) associated with the tne~h~~nism of Bricc and Lucas (1971) and Jentsch (1976). Although many of the gross features of chorus and its effect such as the scattering of magnetospheric particles into the loss cone have already been determined, the details of the wave properties and the instability generating the emission are, in comparison, less understood. Information concerning the wave normal directions of chorus is considered to bc an invaluable too) in studying such wave properties. wave generation nle~hanisin and lne~hal~isrn of producing df;‘dt. There have been very few reports on the dircction find;ng of chorus (Burton and Holzer. 1974;
136
M.
HAYAKAWA
Cornillcau-Wehrlin et ul.. 1976: Hayakawa ct N/., 1984; Goldstein and Tsuratani, 1984). and so further direction finding studies for chorus emissions will be of great importance in obtaining better understanding of the generation and propagation mechanisms of chorus emissions. The present paper presents the direction finding results for chorus emissions observed in the off-equatorial region ofthe outer magnetosphere, on the basis of the GEOS 1 satellite data. Then. a comparison of the present results with the previous equatorial observations will be made in order to discuss the gcncration and propagation tncchanisms of chorus emissions. Finally, we shall point out the unsolved problems to bc investigated in future.
2.
DATA
SOLKCE
AND
DIRECTION
FINDING
METHOD
The field data arc signals obtained by the so-called S-300 cxperimcnt on board the GROS 1 satellite which continuously measures the electric and magnetic wave components. The observed signals are subjected to the onboard analysts ; the swept frequency analyscrs (SFAs) and the corrclator. Six SFAs which may bc connected to any sensor combination, have a bandwidth of 300 Hz and arc swept in frequency in the range O-77 kHz. Before being telemetered to the ground. the signals are transposed in frequency, passed through identical low-pnss filters at 450 Hz. and sampled at 1.488 kHz. The corrclator output, after suitable Fourier transformation on the ground. yields a spectrum of 2.5 kHz (ELF part of the survey mode) or 5.0 kHz (VLF part). The orbit of the satellite is given in Knott (I 978). and the detailed description of the GEOS S-300cxperimenls is given in S-300 Expcrimentcrs (lY79). The spectral matrix at each Fourier component is estimated by using the magnetic SFA data in the VLF part. Several direction finding methods have been proposed (XC Lefeuvre pt (I/.. 1981. 1982). but in this paper we utilize only the wave distribution function (WDF) method in which the maximum entropy concept is applied to the measured spectral matrices (Lcfeuvrc ct c/l., 1981. 1982; Hayakawa e’t (II., 1986). In order to illustrate the direction finding results, we adopt a Cartesian coordinate system O.VJ,Zwhere the z-axis is parallel to the Earth’s magnetic field B,,, the axis 0.~ is in the magnetic meridian plane and is directed towards the Earth. while 0~’ completes the orthogonal set and is directed westward. The wave normal direction (k) is characterized by the polar angle II between k and B,, and the azimuthal angle (/I. the origin of which is 0.~.
CI ul 3. WAVE OF
SPECTRA
CHOHLS
AND
WAVE
EMISSIONS
REGION
OF
THE
NORMAL
IN THE
DIRECTIONS
OFF-EQUATORIAL
MAGNETOSPHERE
We made dctailcd investigation of an event with intense chorus emissions. This event was detected on 12 October 1977 at a geomagnetic latitude i,,,, of 17.4 and an f. value of 7.60 and M.L.T. g IO h. The I, value of the observing position was obviously outside the plasmapausc and so the rclcvant chorus emissions were observed outside the plasmaspherc. The K,, value at the time of observation was K,, = 5 and so the observation was made during considerably disturbed periods. Figure la,b illustrates 44 s ELF spectrograms of radio emissions up to 2.5 kHz at two slightly scparatc times during this event, and the figures indicate a coexistence of different kinds of chorus structures with different cif7d/ s. On occasions, as in Fig. la.b, the spectrum is composed of two bands being scparated by 21 frequency gap at - I .O kHz. The upper band emissions in this case are relatively weak and present only a few structured elements. Such upper band emissions have been investigated in detail by Hayakawa ct al. (1984) and Muto (it ~rl. (1987). who have identified them as being VLF emissions gcneratcd at ;I frequency above one half the electron gyrofrequcncy near the equator. which were first discovered by Tsurutani and Smith (1974). The subject of this paper is not these upper-band emissions, but the lower-band emissions in a frequency range below about 1 kHz. In all of the figures in Fig. I, the lower band emissions arc typically seen to bc very intense and dominant, consisting of structured clcmcnts. In Fig. 1a.b we find two kinds of chorus ; one is impulsive (or burstlikc) and the other is the normal rising tone with positive cif:‘dt. In Fig. 1b most of the choruses arc found to exhibit ;I moderate positive dfl’dr of the order 01 -I kHz s ‘., howcvcr. thcrc were no observed chorus emissions such as fatling tones and constant frequency tones as found in Tsurutani and Smith (1974) and Cornilleau-Wehrlin it N/. (1976). The direction finding measurements have been pcrformed for several time intervals during about live minutes from 06:52:2Y to 06:57:08 U.T. and al several different frequencies. Successful WDFs have been obtained for 21 cases during the above period. and the term “successful” means that the prediction and stability parameters indicating the quality of convergcnce of the WDF solution (Lcfcuvre rt al.. 1981) arc satisfactory for us. Nineteen cases among 21 are found to rcprcsent single-peaked solutions in the WDF; i.e. about 90% of all events analysed. and then only about 10% of the events exhibited doublypeaked WDFs. This mainly single wave observation
EY
0’
2.5 21.5-
2.5 ,
ELF(0
2.5 kHz)
MODE GENERAL
NH = 3140101373
FIG. 1.44s
6
i 10
21.63 39.04
DEG. DEG.
MOY.
BOARD
= .3224E+03
CHAMP
163.40 151.57
THE
6H
MAX.
GEOS
MAX.
M
30
THETA PHI
I
30
12/l O/77
OBSERVED BY E,. ANTENNA ON (a) 6:53:22 U.T. and (b) 6:54:14 U.T.
CHORUSEMISSIONS
20
I
I
= .1703E+03
CPI 0
MOY.
DISTANCE 6.93 R FCE = 2.721 KHZ
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
PROGRAMME
10
DU
20
I
BH
I
SATELLITEON
I
1 I#
r
(b)
(a)
12 OCTOBEK1977.
40
,
40
90
BV 6515 BD 6546
145
= .I 263E+06
DEG. DEG.
54MN
= 9153E+05
PROGRAMME CPI 0 12/l O/77 6H 53MN 22s LATITUDE 21.58 DEG. THETA 163.42 DEG. BV 6515 LONGITUDE 39.20 DEG. PHI 151.53 DEG. BD 6547 DISTANCE 6.93 R BH 89 FCE = 2.711 KHZ CHAMP M
I
NOM
DU
I
OR
OR
SPECTWGRAMSOF
6
DESTINATAIRE
MODE GENERAL
NH = 3140100767
DESTINATAIRE
NOM
:
2
4iSEC.
I..
:
2
‘MODE
4&w.
J
- Mode
I-
Chorus
emissions
139
in outer magnetosphere
(a)
270’= Normalized FIG. VALCE
2.
THF
KELATIONSHIP
A.411 WAVE
FKEQUFNC’Y
wave IETW~FN
frequency THE
NOKMALIZED
LXTEKMIN~D HY THt.
0
LO(‘AL
GYKOFKEQIJEN(‘Y.
b)
( x)
ret”ers to impulsive chorus, and (a) refers to normal rising tone chorus. For a doubly-peaked WDF. the main peak is indicated by either ( x ) or (A) and the corresponding secondary peak is indicated by a small dot connected with the main peak by a line.
is in agreement with Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984). The (0. 9) value of the peak of each WDF was cstimated and the results are summarized in Fig. 2 in the form of II vs wave frequency normalized by the local electron gyrofrequcncy (A =,/lf;,). For the sake ol comparison, two characteristic angles. the oblique resonancc angle. O,,, and Gcndrin angle. II, [the delinitions of these angles are given in Helliwcll (1965)] are plotted as well. In Fig. 2 we have distinguished rising tones (indicated by A) from impulsive ones ( x ), The corresponding occurrence histogram of (/I is summarized in Fig. 3 for rising tones (a) and f01 impulsive ones (b). rcspectivcly. The normAizcd frcqucncy of the analysed chorus emissions ;irc found to lit in a range from 0.2 to 0.4. Figure 2 shows that there is no conspicuous relationship between the 1) value and frequency in the case of rising tones (A) and they take larger OS in a range of 30 -55 ; but ;i tendency for waves ;lt higher frequencies to bc travelling at a larger angle to the field appears for the impulsive chorus ( x ). The present result is directly compared with the corresponding off-equatorial direction finding measurement by Burton and Holzcr ( 1974). They have found that OSfor the dayside chorus are highly concentrated to a range less than 30 at geomagnetic latitudes less than 25 , but the distribution in 0 becomes dispersed extending to (1 - 60 when the geomagnetic latitude becomes above 35 So our Fig. 3 is, generally speaking, consistent with their
b.l(G. ?. THI
O(‘(‘L>KKhhCl
IIISTKII3I. IION IF; f/IbOK KISlhC; IONI:S(a)
AR’I~ I,OK IMP1 I SIVI OYIS
(b).
results. Burton and Holzcr (I 974) have. however, only found normal rising tones, and only the impulsive chorus is treated in this paper. Then WCcan note from Fig. 3a. that for rising tones there appears to be a concentration of the wave normals to an azimuth. $ = 40 50 . but there is quite a scatter in C/I distribution for the impulsive chorus ; however. the statistical study of (b distribution in Fig. 3 does not seem to be so significant bccausc of a small amount of data. Then, the relationship between the observed cl//dr of chorus and the corresponding 0 value is presented in Fig. 4 for which 0 is plotted as a function of dfldr. Two structures of chorus emissions are observed ; i.c. rising tone and impulsive one. For the rising tones,
&I. the
!I :
8.I)* .
I arc located just
observing ~atcllitcs in Table
in the vicinity
of gcomagnctic
equator.
Burton
and
Holzer
(1974) have suggcstcd that chorus (rising and
falling
tones) is generated
at latitudes
within
25
of
the equatorial
piano on the daysidc and within 2 on
the nightsidc.
Such a broad
generation
around
equator for dayside chorus has furthermore ported
by the lutcr work
(1977).
Taking
Table
the
hcon sup-
by Tsurutani
and Smith
into account the satcllitc locations
in
I. it may be possible that all of their previous
rcsulrs [cxccpt the ~~~-~qli~tori~~l observation ton and Holzer
(1974)j
of wave
of chorus cxccpt impulsive distribution
of wave
source: rcgon, propagation
ones strongly
have invcstigatcd
reflect the within
the
it is still possible that some
effects arc prcscnt. to 5
by Bur-
directions
norm;11 directions
although
range from 0
normal
Within
the Iatitudc
, Goldstein and Tsurutani
(1984)
the latitude effect of the 0 angle of
falling and constant frequency tones, and they
slightly
have found no apparent
relation.
implying
that their
result priii~~~rily represents the original distributi~~n oi wave generation gation
the nor-
have found that larger 0s correspond to highcr rclativc frcqucncy. frcqucncy
bcforc.
thcrc inay bc iI
but 111eyhave shown that their putative dcpcndcncc
quency depcndcncc
frcqucncy depcndcnce of 0. Concerning
thi: propa-
to 55 ‘. Thcrc is ;t
to -60
the above computation
have to mention
than
malircd frcqucncy (A). Goldstein and Tsurutani (IYX4)
large scatter in the II of the impulsive chorus from 5 but as mcntioncd
rather
the second paramctcr.
’ and the 0
dfl’dr is in ;I range from 0.8 to 1.5 kHz s is found to fall in a range from 30
directions
effects. For
of (11. 4’,) wc
that there is an ambiguity
of IX0
in
is open to question.
This frc-
has also been studied by Haya-
(1084). who have indicntcd that thcrc is no hctwccn 0 an& and frcyucncy. The
kawa CI ol.
definite relation
the scnsc of ~~r~~p~~g~~tion, hecausc we use only three
tiorni~lliz~d frcyucncios. A, of chorus xc found to lit
1n~lgncti~ field ~~~lnp~~nci~ts.The
in a range from 0.15
clcctric antenna
analyses in orricr 10 rcmovc
above-mentioned
ambiguity
Unfortunately
dotermination
from
the
was strong enough to include the E,
ticld in the WDF (1987).
intensity
as done by Muto
olcar distinction
the
PI rrl.
in the scnsc
was not obtained.
1984: Hayakawa
to 0.45 (Coldstcin and Tsurutani.
c’t N(.. 19X4). After
having rcvicwcd
1, the rclntion-
all the previous works as given in Table
ship bctwccn II value and the third paramctcr. is now investigated. structure
with
L.T.
appears
previous reports (Burton and
Smith.
Goldstein 1984).
On
1974:
df:dt,
A close association of the chorus to exist. as seen from
and Holzcr,
Burtis
and
1974: Tsurutani Hclliwcll.
1976: c’f (I/.,
and Tsurutani,
1954:
Hayakawa
the nightside.
ditfercnt
kinds
of chorus
sii-t~~ttir~~ have been obscrvcd. including falling toncs. PKOI’,~Z(;.4TION
01’
CHOKLS
constnnt
I<\llSSlOM
First wo rcvicw the previous results of’wavc normal determinations
of chorus
emissions which h;tvc been
1nadc by a few investigators items habc been summnrized Burton and Holzcr
and WIIOSCimportant in Table
I. Apart
(1974), all of tlrc direction
frequency
tones and normal
rising tones.
whereas when L.T. is increased to the daysidc as trc-
from
tinding
atcd in this paper. WC observe mainly tones and also impulsive (or burstlikc) Fig. 5 wc hnvc plotted
normal
rising
oncs. Hcncc in
the angle 0 as a function
ol
dfl’dt on the basis of the descriptions in all the papers in Table
I. As seen from this tigure, thcrc seems to be
plant. Thcrc arc suvcr~~d ;I tendency for the 0 value to increase with d/id/ in the which seem to bc rclatcd to the mcastrrcd region of positive df;‘dr. Also when df?dt is relatively
was done near the cqua[orial paramctcrs
0 valt~cnl‘clmw~
: ( 1)
the obscrving gcomagnctic I;\&
tudc (i.,,,): (7) the normalized
wave Trcyucncy (A): and
(3) the spectral shnpc. c{f’dl. As for the first par;mlctcr.
small. whcthcr
it is positive (rising lone) or ticgativc
(t’,illing tone), tbc 0 vului: is rciati>cly it is less than 30 . or rather
smafi such that
Icss than 30
On the
Chorus emissions in outer magnetosphere TABLE
I. S~JMMAKY ok THE PKEVIOUS DIK~CTION
I:INDI~(;
PLANE IN
Geomagnetic latitude (&,)
Burton and HolLer
Equator + oKequator
(1974)
Cornillca-Wchrlin <‘Iul. ( 1976)
2
Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984) Hnyuk~~wa c’f (/I. ( 1983)
<5 0.4
L value 6.0
10.0
-5
0
0 I :oo
6.0 7.0
- 02:oo
6.6
03:oo~ l6:OO
5 (kHz sml)” Positive df/dt (rising tone)
FK;. 5. THI: XMMAKY PLOT OI’ THE KELATIONSHIPn1:1 WI‘I'N0 dfldt uASEI) ON THI‘ 1’KtVIOI:S ~QUAIOKIAL MIXS1KI
AN,)
MFN-I‘S,
Again. impulsive chorus is plotted just outside d/:dr = IO kHI s ‘. f-l mcmx the summary Il-om Haynkawa (11(I/. (1984). GtT corresponds to Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984). C. Cornilleau-Wehrlin c/ trl. (1976) and B+Il. Burton and tlolrcr
( 1974).
Night
6.0 7.0
goo1
Negative df/dt (falling tone)
Local time (L.T.)
(0O:OO ~O?OO) Day (730 1430)
for the region of negative df;‘dt (falling tones). there dots not seem to exist any definite relationship. However. it is likely that falling tones tend to exhibit larger II values than those for small cif,jdt around the origin in the figure. This putative but suggestive figure has to be confirmed by a more systematic study of many chorus events. WC now discuss the behaviour of wave normal directions in the oEequatorial region as presented in this paper, with rcspcct to its comparison with the equatorial observations. First. we discuss the question
-10
cI1oiws
EMISSIONS MAIIE N~AK -rw
EQuATOKlAL
location
contrary.
I
lax
‘I-HI:OIJTEK MAGNt’TOSI’HFRE
Observing
Investigators
MtAsu~tbKNTs
141
Structure chorus
or
Rising and
frilling tones
Rising. calling tones and burstlikc (impulsive) Falling tone Impulsive and rising tone
Satellite and remarks lx0 5 Observalion is made at diffcrcnt geomagnetic latitudes (0 50 ) OGO 5
OGO 5 GEOS 2
of whether one wave or multiple waves arc prcscnt in chorus. Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984) have compared the residuals of the one- and Lwo-direction model fits to the observed spectral matrix and they have concluded that in mosl casts only a single plane wave is present. The present study based on the WDF analyses has implied that about 90% of the events arc composed of a single plant wave. This single wave observation is in agreement with Goldstein and Tsurutani (19X4) and is contrary to the Kennel and Petschek (1966) picture of bouncing wave pack&. In the studies of Burton and Holzcr (1974) and CornilIcau-Wchrlin c’t nl. (1976). they have adopted Means’ method (1977) based on the hypothesis of the oncdirection model, but their II values scctn to be rcliablc bccausc most chorus cvcnts arc due IO the one-dircction model even if they have erroneously dctcrmincd wave normals of SOIIK chorus events if second waves were present. Within the source region near the equator, Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984) have found that the distribution in C/Iappears to bc isotropic. strongly implying that the satellite is located within the source region. Now Ict us compare Figs 2 and 4. In the present paper. IWO different types ofchorus arc observed : rising tones and impulsive oncs. The d/;dr of rising tones observed lies just around I .O kHz s ’ as in Fig. 4. which is apparently typical al thcsc L values and L.T.s, from the work of Burtis and Helliwcll (1976). In Fig. 5. the (I values of a chorus with df,dt of this order are found to be relatively small, less than 20 in lhc equatorial plane. which is likely to be an cstablishcd fact. Compared with this result, Fig. 4 seems to indicate that OSarc considerably larger than those in Fig. 5 for rising tones. this being further supported by the results of off-equatorial direction
142
M.
HAYAKAWA
finding by Burton and Holzcr (1974). Together with this, we again consider our Fig. 3. Although the amount of data is relatively small, it might appear that there is some concentration of 4 around a specific vaiue for rising tones. As seen from the 3-D raytracings by Cairo and Lefeuvre (1986) and M uto et crl.(1987). the wave normal directions have a tendency to be focused into the magnetic meridian plant during the course of propagation from the source: but the possibility of observing emissions at a spacecraft is strongly dependent on the relative location between the source and spacecraft. Hence. we can consider that the concentration of (1, in Fig. 3a implies that some propagation effects have played a role. at Icast for the rising tone chorus observed away from the equator in this paper. So although Burton and Holzcr (1974) have concluded that the source region ofchorus (falling and rising tones, but not impulsive) at daytime is at latitudes within 25 of the equatorial plane. it seems to us that the generation region of rising tone chorus obscrvcd at L.T. = IO h in this paper, is located at a latitude still lower than the satellite latitude 01 I.,,, = 17 For the impulsive chorus, however. the II value is greatly scattered in a wide range from 5 to 25 and from 45 to 60 in Fig. 4. but the I) of the impulsive chorus near the equator makes large angles with the magnetic field as in Fig. 5 ; because the gencration mechanism of impuIsivc chorus is not well understood, WC do not know at present which figure at the equatorial or at the off-equatorial region might rctlcct the wave generation distribution at the source rcpion. One important point to mention here is r&ted to the finding by Tsurutani and Smith (1977) of ;I high-latitude chorus in the dayside. They have indicatcd that 21 high-latitude chorus in the daysidc appears to begcncrated locally in minimum Bpockcts. regions of local minimum magnetic ficlds found betwccn 20 and SO magnetic latitude which arc caused by the compression of lhc daysidc magnctosphcrc. The association ofthc chorus in this puper with those high-latitude choruses would bc intcrcsting. Thcrc art‘ many problems to bc solved and we suggest the follow,ing subjects to be investigated in future. (1) For lower frequency (A = 0.1~~0.3) rising tones with modcratc d/,)dt s typical at the rclcvant L value 21s studied by Burtis and Helliwcll (1976). their gcneration is due to the gyroresonancc interaction between whistler-mode M’BVCS and counterstrcaming clcctrons in the vicinity of the geomagnetic cquatot based on the following reasons. The first cvidencc is the equatorial direction finding studies (as surnmarizcd in Fig. 5). The other is the consideration of the interaction region by using the value of dfidt. Hclliwell’s (1967) theory suggests that the latitude of
CI rrl
the interaction region is related to the slope, dfldt, of an emission by the inhomogencity of the medium. Using this theory in the relevant plasma parameters and taking cifldt = 1 kHz s ‘, the latitude of the interaction region is found to be about 5”. so our Fig. 4 as obtained from the off-equatorial observation at A,,, = I7 , might indicate the prcsencc of propagation cffccts. Ray-tracing computations will be greatly needed in order to confirm both the equatorial emission generation with II 1 0 and the propagation effect from the equator to the spacecraft. (2) For rising tones at higher frequencies (A = 0.3 0.45), it is again plausible that the emissions are gcnerated near the equator with small 0s. However, Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984) have found 21 small concentration of 0s at relatively large angles just around Oa in the frequency range. A = 0.%0.45 [see Fig. 7 in Goldstein and Tsurutani (1984)]. Of course. this concentration is not so conspicuous compared with the clear concentration of half-gyrofrcquency VLF emissions 31 a special angle of O,, (Hayakawa c’t rtl.. 1984: Muto et cd., 1987). There are a few thcorctical studies on this point (Brinca. 1972 ; Cuperman and Sternlieb, 1974) and Brinca (I 972) has predicted maximum wave growth along the field for very low frequencies. but large off-axis growth with increasing frequency. Hcncc. further theoretical study on which kinds of magnctospheric conditions (cold and hot plasmas) arc required for oblique instability should be done in order to explain the possibility of this off-axis WLIVC growth at higher frequencies below /;,/2. The II results in the otf-equatorial region (i,,, = 17 , Fig. 4 in this paper) must be considered again with the aid of ray-tracing computations 21s mcntioncd in point (I). (3) Marc direction finding results for falling tone chorus cvcnts have to be accumulated in order to have a definite relationship bctwccn II and df;dr, if any. (4) Impulsive chorus at the equator is found to take large I) unglcs as summarized in Fig. 5. but Fig. 4 suggests that there is a large scatter in II from nearly 0 to - 60 The structures of normal rising. falling and nearly constant frcqucncy tones stem to be explained in terms of the drifting oscillator model by Helliwell (1967). However. what is the gcncration mechanism of impulsive (burstlike) chorus emissions? Where are they gcneratcd and how arc they propagated? Detailed study of this problem will be required. (5) When dealing with the direction finding of chorus emissions in the ofT-equatorial regions in the daysidc as done in this paper and as further required in future. the association of the chorus emissions observed far from the equator with high-latitude chorus by Tsurutani and Smith (1977) will be invcstigatcd.
Chorus
emissions
in outer magnetosphere
REFERENCES
Anderson, R. R. and Maeda, K. (1977) VLF emissions associated with enhanced magnetospheric electrons. J. geophyc Rex. 82. 135 146. Bricc, N. M. and Lucas, C. (1971) Influence of magnetospheric convection and polar wind on loss ofelectrons from the outer radiation belt. J. gqrophy.y. Res. 76. 900908. Brinca, A. L. (1972) On the stability of obliquely propagating whistlers. J. gcophys. Rcs. 77. 34953507. Burtis, W. J. and Helliwcll, R. A. (1976) Magnctosphcric chorus : occurrence patterns and normalized frequency. PI~nrr. Spcrcc Sci. 24, 1007m 1024. Burton, R. K. and Holzer, R. E. (1974) The origin and propagation of chorus in the outer magnetosphere. J. gmphy. Rcs. 79. 10 14 1023. Cairo. L. and Lefeuvre, F. (1986) Localization of sources of ELF!VLF hiss observed in the magnetosphere: three dimensional ray tracing. J. grophr.v. Rcs. 91, 4352 4364. Cornilleau-Wehrlin. N.. Etcheto, J. and Burton, R. K. (1976) Detailed analysis of magnetospheric ELF chorus : prcliminary results. J. utl)r~.s. tc~rr. Phyx. 38, 1201 1710. Cuperman. S. and Sternlieb, A. (1974) Obliquely propagating unstable whistler waves : a computer simulation. J. plusmcr Pi!,X I I, I75 ~-188. Goldstein, B. E. and Tsurutani, B. T. (1984) Wave normal directions of chorus near the equatorial source region. J. ycoph>~.\. Rrs. 89, 2789m 28 IO. Hayakawa, M., Bullough, K. and Kaiser, T. R. (1977) The properties of storm-time magnetospheric VLF emissions as deduced from the Arirl-3 satellite and ground-based observations. Pltrno. S/XXX,Sci. 25. 353 368. Hayakawa. M.. Ohmi. N.. Parrot. M. and Lcl’euvrc, F. (1986) Direction finding of ELF hiss emissions in a detached plasma region of the magnetosphere. J. ,ywph~.r. Rc.r. 91, 135-141. Hayakawa, M., Tanaka. Y., Shimakura. S. and Iizuka. A. (1986) Statistical characteristics of medium-latitude VLF emissions (unstructured and structured) : the local time dependence and the association with geomagnetic disturbances. Pluncr. Spuce Sri. 34. 1361 1372. Hayakawa, M., Yamanaka, Y., Parrot, M. and Lcfeuvrc. F. (1984) The wave normals of magnetospheric chorus emissions observed on board GEOS 2. J. ,qe(~p/lj’s. Res. 89. 2X11-2X21.
143
Stanford. California. Helliwell, R. A. (1967) A theory of discrete VLF emissions from the magnetosphere. J. gcwphys. Res. 72, 4773-4790. Isenberg. P. A.. Koons, H. C. and Fennell. J. F. (1982) Simultaneous observations of energetic electrons and dawnside chorus in geosynchronous orbit. J. geophys. Rex. 87. 149551503. Jentsch, V. (1976) Electron precipitation in the morning sector of the aurora1 zone. J. qwph~~s. Res. 81, 135 146. Kennel, C. F. and Petschek, H. E. (1966) Limit on stably trapped particle fluxes. J. ,qrophy.r. Rcs. 71, I-28. Knott, K. (1978) The GEOS-I mission. S/XX~ %i. Rec. 22. 321-325. Lefeuvre, F., Neubert, T. and Parrot, M. (1982) Wave normal directions and wave distribution functions for groundbased transmitter signals observed on GEOS I. J. gc’op/zy,s. Re.>. 87. 6203 6217. Lefeuvre. F.. Parrot. M. and Delannoy, C. (1981) Wave distribution function estimation of VLF electromagnetic waves observed onboard GEOS. J. +wpilys. Res. 86,2359 2375. Means. J. D. (1972) Use of the three-dimensional covariancc matrix in analyzing the propagation properties of plane waves. J. q;rcwpl~w.Res. 77, 5551 5559. Muto. H.. Hayakawa, M.. Parrot, M. and Lefeuvre. F. (1987) Direction finding of half-gyrofrequency VLF emissions in the otf-equatorial region of the magnetosphere and their generation and propagation. J. geophys. Re.r. 92. 753% 7550. S-300 Experimenters (1979) Measurements of electric and magnetic wave fields and of cold plasma parameters onboard GEOS-I Preliminary results. Fku7c~~. Spuw Sci. 27, 3 17-339. Thorne. R. M., Church. S. R.. Malloy, W. J. and Tsurutani. B. T. (1977) The local time variations of ELF missions during periods of substorm activity. J. ,qcwphys. Rcs. 82, 1585 1590. Tsurutani, B. T. and Smith, E. J. (1974) Postmidnight chorus: a substorm phenomenon. J. ,qrophy.r. Rcs. 79, 118-127. Tsurutani, B. T. and Smith, E. J. (1977) Two types of magnetospheric ELF chorus and their substorm dependences. J. ~/cw/dm. Rm. 82. 5 I I2 5 IX. Tsurutani. B. T.. Smith. E. J.. West, H. I., Jr. and Buck, R. M. (1979) Chorus, energetic electrons and magnetospheric substorms. in Wuw.v and Imtuhili/ie.~ in Spuw P1o.w~~ (Edited by Palmadcsso, P. J. and Papadoulos. K.). pp. 55 62. Rcidcl. Dordrccht.