1N F4TIEMS M’RIP CERlBRAL PALSY Stdko, M5.. S.J. DeeSwti, MD, DR. Wenger, MD., D.H. Sutherland, M.D., K.R. Kaufmman, PhD.. h4.P. Wyatt, MA.. R.P.T., H.6. Chambers, MD, iMotion Analysis Laboratory Zu:drsn’s Hospitd ad Health Center San Diego, Ca. 92123
WBS $0 -t 4 years ( 4 + 6 yrs WI9 + 2 yrs). All
Mean age at time of osi~otomy
patients were ambulatory
with or wirhour awnrive
devices. Mea foilowup period All patients tmdenvent manual goniome:ric tsstmg of static join: xxstions by one of Wo orthopedic surgeons utilizing the same go~iom?cer both preo~rafively and postopemtiveiy. Computerized 3D gait ma:ysz ofdymmic pid rotations and time d:stmn-e parameters was obtained ~eoperativel~ and postoperaweiy uti!izing Vicon software and standard marker sets. Wneiratic pazneten studied inciuded tibial rotation and foot progression argle at 30% (,tidswxe) and 50% (teninal stance) of the no.mnlized gait cycle. Preoperative and posto~w&e values for these parameters were tben compared to determine if alignment wx improved by the operative procedure. Kistler force @ate data were obtained on patients who were indcpndant ambulators. Subjective changes m gait patfen. as noted by the patients and or parents, were &so recorded at PstoPxxtive gait analysis. m ‘Ebial iofafm: Al! patients showed imixw%d tibial rotation at postoperative gst an&sis. Mean improvema~ at 30% gait cycle was 25.7 degrees (0.0-70.0) m m kq?roverr?ent ar 50% gas cycle was 3i.i degrees (10.0 70.0). Foot progresrion ang!e: All @ems showed improvement in foot progressicn was 24.9 montks (15 mon!bs to 5: monrhsj.