Journal Pre-proof Distinguishing between Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer’s Disease using Metabolic Patterns Byoung Seok Ye, MD, PhD, Sangwon Lee, PhD, Hansoo Yoo, MD, Seok Jong Chung, MD, Yang Hyun Lee, MD, Yonghoon Choi, Phil Hyu Lee, MD, PhD, Young H. Sohn, MD, PhD, Mijin Yun, MD, PhD PII:
S0197-4580(19)30384-7
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.10.020
Reference:
NBA 10702
To appear in:
Neurobiology of Aging
Received Date: 9 April 2019 Revised Date:
25 October 2019
Accepted Date: 29 October 2019
Please cite this article as: Ye, B.S., Lee, S., Yoo, H., Chung, S.J., Lee, Y.H., Choi, Y., Lee, P.H., Sohn, Y.H, Yun, M., Distinguishing between Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer’s Disease using Metabolic Patterns, Neurobiology of Aging (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neurobiolaging.2019.10.020. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Ye 1
Distinguishing between Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer’s Disease using Metabolic Patterns
Byoung Seok Ye, MD, PhD1, Sangwon Lee, PhD2, Hansoo Yoo, MD1, Seok Jong Chung, MD1, Yang Hyun Lee, MD1, Yonghoon Choi2, Phil Hyu Lee, MD, PhD1, Young H Sohn, MD, PhD1, Mijin Yun, MD, PhD2
1
Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author: Mijin Yun, MD, PhD. Corresponding author’s address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. Corresponding author’s phone and fax: Tel.: +82-2-2228-2350. Fax: +82-2-312-0578 Corresponding author’s e-mail address:
[email protected]
Ye 2 1
Abstract
2
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are the two most common
3
causes of dementia. We compared the regional metabolism on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)
4
positron emission tomography (PET) among 21 control subjects and cognitively impaired
5
patients due to DLB (N = 63) and AD (N = 38). All participants underwent 18F-Florbetaben
6
(FBB) PET, and all DLB patients had abnormality on dopamine transporter PET. Both the
7
FBB-positive DLB (N = 38) and FBB-negative DLB (N = 25) groups had increased
8
metabolism in the bilateral central cerebellum, posterior putamen and somatomotor cortices
9
compared to the control and AD groups. Compared to the control group, the DLB and AD
10
groups commonly exhibited hypometabolism in the bilateral lateral temporal, temporo-
11
parietal junction, posterior cingulate, and precuneus cortices. Both DLB groups had
12
additional hypometabolism in the bilateral thalami and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, while
13
the AD group did in the bilateral entorhinal cortices and hippocampi. Our results suggest that
14
hypermetabolism in the somatomotor cortex, posterior putamen, or central cerebellum could
15
be a useful imaging biomarker for detecting DLB patients, while entorhinal/hippocampal
16
hypometabolism could be a specific biomarker for AD.
17 18
Key words: Dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, fluorodeoxyglucose positron
19
emission tomography, β-amyloid, metabolism
Ye 3 20
1. Introduction
21
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of degenerative
22
dementia after Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Hansen et al., 1990; Perry et al., 1990). Core
23
clinical features for the diagnosis of DLB include cognitive fluctuation, visual hallucinations,
24
parkinsonism, and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (McKeith et al., 2017).
25
However, extremely low sensitivity of clinical DLB diagnosis in cognitively impaired
26
patients, especially in patients with concomitant AD pathology, causes a huge discrepancy
27
between the clinical and pathological prevalence of DLB (Nelson et al., 2010).
28
Metabolic changes on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography
29
(PET) is a useful biomarker for differential diagnosis of dementia. Hypometabolism in the
30
occipital cortex and temporoparietal association cortices (Minoshima et al., 2001), and
31
relative sparing of the posterior cingulate cortex (cingulate island sign) (Graff-Radford et al.,
32
2014) have been suggested as characteristic metabolic patterns of DLB. However, previous
33
studies have shown that AD and DLB share common metabolic patterns of temporoparietal
34
hypometabolism (Minoshima et al., 2001), and that concurrent AD tangle pathology modifies
35
the cingulate island sign in DLB patients (Graff-Radford et al., 2014; Iizuka et al., 2017).
36
Therefore, it is difficult to differentiate DLB from AD or detect DLB patients with
37
concomitant AD based on current FDG-PET biomarkers.
38
In addition, there are several biomarkers supporting the diagnosis of DLB. Low
39
dopamine transporter uptake in the basal ganglia on dopamine transporter imaging, cardiac
40
postganglionic sympathetic denervation on iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial
41
scintigraphy, and polysomnography-confirmed rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder
42
are biomarkers indicative of DLB (McKeith et al., 2017). Dopamine transporter imaging
43
could differentiate clinically diagnosed probable DLB from AD (McKeith et al., 2007).
44
However, while its specificity is high (90.4%), the sensitivity of dopamine transporter
Ye 4 45
imaging is relatively low (77.7%), and its diagnostic validity has not been evaluated in
46
autopsy-confirmed DLB patients. Amyloid PET is currently used for the diagnosis of AD.
47
However, as about half of DLB patients also exhibit significant β-amyloid deposition (Irwin
48
et al., 2017), amyloid PET is not an optimal tool for the differential diagnosis of AD and
49
DLB.
50
Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), commonly caused by pathologic cerebral
51
accumulation of α-synuclein, have hypermetabolism in the basal ganglia, thalamus, motor
52
cortex and central cerebellum on FDG PET (Eckert et al., 2007), and their cognitive
53
dysfunction correlates with hypermetabolism in the cerebellum (Eidelberg, 2009), paracentral
54
cortex and putamen (Wu et al., 2018). Considering that PD dementia and DLB share a
55
common pathology and clinical findings and that the distinction between them is only made
56
clinically, we hypothesized that PD-related hypermetabolic patterns could exist in DLB
57
patients. In this study, we recruited DLB patients whose dopaminergic depletion was
58
confirmed using dopamine transporter imaging and compared their metabolic patterns with
59
control subjects and AD patients whose cerebral Aβ status was evaluated using 18F-
60
Florbetaben (FBB) PET.
61 62
2. Methods
63
2.1. Participants
64
Six-three consecutive patients clinically diagnosed with cognitive impairment due to DLB
65
were recruited between January 2015 and March 2019 from a dementia outpatient clinic
66
and/or a movement disorders outpatient clinic at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University
67
Health System. All DLB patients fulfilled the 2017 revised criteria for probable DLB
68
(McKeith et al., 2017), and were confirmed to have dopaminergic depletion on 18F-N-
69
fluoropropyl-2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane (FP-CIT) PET. To ascertain
Ye 5 70
early brain changes in DLB patients, we included mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients
71
(Petersen et al., 1999) who met all of the diagnostic criteria for probable DLB, except for the
72
presence of dementia. Patients with secondary causes of cognitive deficits or parkinsonism,
73
as confirmed by laboratory tests and brain structural changes, including territorial cerebral
74
infarction, brain tumors, and normal pressure hydrocephalus, were excluded. Clinical features
75
of Lewy body (LB) disease including parkinsonism, REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD),
76
visual hallucinations, and cognitive fluctuation were evaluated using semi-structured
77
questionnaires by caregivers. The severity of parkinsonism was assessed according to the
78
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score
79
and was regarded as moderate if the score was higher than 16.
80
During the same study period, consecutive AD patients and those with MCI due to
81
AD were also recruited. All AD patients met the criteria for probable AD dementia with high
82
levels of biomarker evidence (McKhann et al., 2011), and all MCI patients met the criteria
83
for high likelihood of MCI due to AD (Albert et al., 2011) from the National Institute on
84
Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups guidelines for AD. All of these patients were
85
identified to have significant cerebral β-amyloid deposition on FBB PET as described below.
86
As previous studies reported frequent LB pathologies in AD patients (Chung et al., 2015;
87
Ditter and Mirra, 1987; Lemstra et al., 2017; Leverenz and Sumi, 1986), we did not include
88
AD patients with significant parkinsonism (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale > 15) on
89
neurologic examinations and clinical features including RBD and visual hallucination
90
suggesting concomitant LB pathology. Resultingly, 22 patients with MCI due to AD and 16
91
with AD dementia were recruited.
92
Control subjects were recruited through an on-going independent study (Institutional
93
Review Board No. 4-2015-0551) using poster advertisement for normal older adults visiting
94
Yonsei University Medical Center. Twenty-one healthy control subjects had no previous
Ye 6 95
history of neurologic or psychiatric illnesses, showed normal cognitive function on all
96
neuropsychological tests, and exhibited normal findings on the neurologic examination,
97
structural MRI, FDG PET, and FBB PET. This study was approved by the Institutional
98
Review Board of Severance Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all
99
participants.
100 101
2.2. Neuropsychological assessment
102
All participants underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery called the Seoul
103
Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB), which is described in our previous study
104
(Lee et al., 2018). Briefly, this battery included the backward digit span test for attention;
105
Korean version of the Boston Naming Test (K-BNT) for language function; the immediate
106
recall, delayed recall and recognition items of Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) and Rey-
107
Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) for memory function; RCFT copy for visuospatial
108
function; and phonemic and semantic Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) and
109
the Stroop color reading for frontal/executive function. Age- and education-matched norms
110
were available for all scorable tests of SNSB, and standardized z scores were used in the
111
current study.
112 113
2.3. MRI acquisition
114
MRI was performed using a Philips 3.0-Tesla MRI scanner (Philips Achieva; Philips Medical
115
System, Best, The Netherlands) with previously described protocols (Lee et al., 2018).
116 117
2.4. PET imaging
118
FP-CIT PET, FDG PET and FBB PET acquisitions were performed using Discovery 600
119
(General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, MI, USA). Imaging and reconstruction protocols
Ye 7 120
for FP-CIT PET and FBB PET are described in our previous study (Lee et al., 2018). Based
121
on visual ratings by an expert reader (MJ Yun), brain β-amyloid plaque load (BAPL) score
122
(Barthel et al., 2011) and FP-CIT PET abnormalities (Oh et al., 2012) were assessed.
123
Participants with BAPL scores of 2 and 3 were regarded to have significant β-amyloid
124
deposition, while those with a BAPL score of 1 were not. FDG PET scans were acquired
125
according to the following protocol. Approximately 4.1 MBq per body weight (kg) of 18F-
126
FDG was intravenously administered to the patients. After the 60 min of uptake period, PET
127
images were acquired for 15 min. All FDG-PET images were acquired with a Discovery 600
128
(GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) PET-computed tomography (CT) scanner. The spiral
129
CT scan for attenuation correction was performed with a 0.8 s rotation time, 60 mA, 120 kVp,
130
3.75 mm section thickness, 0.625 mm collimation, and 9.375 mm table feed per rotation.
131
FDG-PET images were reconstructed using the ordered subset expectation maximization
132
(OSEM) algorithm with 4 iterations and 32 subsets. To compare the FDG metabolism
133
between the patient group and control, FDG PET images were normalized to the FDG-PET
134
dementia-specific template, which was created by averaging a number of 100 FDG-PET
135
images (50 control subjects and 50 patients) that were smoothed with an 8-mm full width half
136
maximum Gaussian filter and normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute reference
137
space (Della Rosa et al., 2014; Perani et al., 2014). The spatially normalized and smoothed
138
PET images underwent an intensity normalization to the cerebellar cortex to standardize the
139
magnitude of all voxel values.
140
All DLB patients underwent FP-CIT PET, FDG PET and FBB PET. From the 63
141
DLB patients, 38 of them had significant β-amyloid deposition (FBB+ DLB), and the rest of
142
the 25 DLB patients did not (FBB- DLB). All AD patients underwent FBB PET and
143
exhibited significant β-amyloid deposition.
144
Ye 8 145
2.5. Statistical analysis
146
Analyses of demographic variables and cognitive scores were performed using the Statistical
147
Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical
148
analyses for FDG PET were performed using the MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc, Natick,
149
MA)-based software called statistical parametric mapping (SPM, Wellcome Trust Centre for
150
Neuroimaging, London, UK) (Kiebel et al., 2007). General linear models were used to
151
compare standardized neuropsychological test scores and regional FDG metabolism between
152
FBB+ DLB, FBB- DLB, AD, and control groups after controlling for age, sex, and education.
153
False discovery rate (FDR) corrections were performed on multiple statistical tests applied to
154
13 neuropsychological tests on neuropsychological analyses and multiple voxels on FDG-
155
PET analyses with statistical significance set at a corrected q-value less than 0.05.
156 157
3. Results
158
3.1. Demographic and clinical characteristics
159
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The
160
FBB- DLB group was older than the control group and the AD group. The proportions of
161
male patients were higher both in the FBB- DLB and FBB+ DLB groups than in the AD
162
group. There were no significant differences in terms of education and cardiovascular risk
163
factors among the FBB- DLB, FBB+ DLB, AD, and control groups. The three disease groups
164
did not differ in disease duration, the proportion of demented patients, and K-MMSE score.
165
However, the FBB- DLB and FBB+ DLB groups had higher Clinical Dementia Rating Sum
166
of Boxes (CDR-SOB) than the AD group. Since AD patients who showed clinical features of
167
DLB were excluded from our AD group, both DLB groups had higher proportions of patients
168
with parkinsonism, cognitive fluctuation, visual hallucination, and RBD on semi-structured
169
questionnaires by caregivers, compared to AD group. The severity of parkinsonism measured
Ye 9 170
by the UPDRS motor score and that of hyposmia measured by the cross-cultural smell
171
identification test were more severe in the two DLB groups compared to the AD group.
172 173
3.2. Neuropsychological performances
174
Compared to the control group, the FBB- DLB, FBB+ DLB, and AD groups had lower
175
cognitive scores on all neuropsychological tests (Table 2). Compared to the AD group, the
176
FBB+ DLB group had lower scores in COWAT phonemic and Stroop color reading test and
177
a higher score in SVLT delayed recall. Compared to the AD group, the FBB- DLB group had
178
lower scores in RCFT copy, COWAT phonemic, and Stroop color reading test and a higher
179
score in SVLT delayed recall. There was no significant difference in other
180
neuropsychological tests between the disease groups.
181 182
3.3. Group-wise comparisons of regional FDG metabolism
183
Compared to the control group, the FBB+ DLB and FBB- DLB groups commonly exhibited
184
increased metabolism in the bilateral central cerebellum, posterior putamen, and
185
somatomotor cortices, in addition to the bilateral medial temporal cortices (Figure 1A-B).
186
The AD group did not have increased metabolism, compared to the control group (Figure 1C).
187
Compared to the control group, the FBB+ DLB, FBB- DLB, and AD groups commonly
188
exhibited decreased metabolism in the bilateral lateral temporal, temporo-parietal junction,
189
posterior cingulate, and precuneus cortices (Figure 1A-C). The FBB+ DLB group exhibited
190
an additional hypometabolism in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal and occipital cortices, in
191
addition to the bilateral thalami and caudate nuclei; the FBB- DLB group did so in the
192
bilateral thalami and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices; and the AD group did in the bilateral
193
entorhinal cortices and hippocampi. When the FBB+ DLB and AD groups were directly
194
compared, the FBB+ DLB group exhibited higher metabolism in the bilateral central
Ye 10 195
cerebellum, posterior putamen, and somatomotor cortices, in addition to the bilateral
196
entorhinal cortices, amygdala, and hippocampi, than the AD group (Figure 1D), while the
197
FBB+ DLB group had lower metabolism in the bilateral caudate, thalami, and bilateral lateral
198
temporal, temporo-parietal, precuneus, dorsolateral prefrontal, and occipital cortices. When
199
the FBB- DLB and AD groups were directly compared, the FBB- DLB group had higher
200
metabolism in the same brain regions where the FBB+ DLB group did (Figure 1E), while the
201
FBB- DLB group had lower metabolism in the bilateral caudate, bilateral dorsolateral
202
prefrontal, and right parietal cortices. There was no region where the two DLB groups had
203
significantly different metabolism (Figure 1F). We summarized the SPM findings in the
204
Supplementary Table 1.
205 206
3.4. Sensitivity analyses
207
As there was a significant difference in CDR-SOB and as the AD group tended to have a
208
lower proportion of demented patients (Table 1), sensitivity analyses were performed among
209
the three disease groups 1) using CDR-SOB as an additional covariate, 2) performing
210
analysis confined to MCI patients, and 3) performing analyses confined to demented patients
211
and controlling for CDR-SOB. The patterns of the results did not change in the sensitivity
212
analysis 1 (Supplementary Figures 1). The sensitivity analysis 2 confined to MCI patients
213
showed that the FBB+ DLB MCI group had a significant metabolic difference compared to
214
the AD-MCI group, while the FBB-DLB MCI group did not (Supplementary Figure 2). The
215
sensitivity analysis 3 confined to demented patients showed that the FBB- DLB dementia
216
group had a significant metabolic difference, compared to the AD dementia group, while the
217
FBB+ DLB dementia group did not (Supplementary Figure 3). However, the patterns of
218
differences were similar on T value maps (Supplementary Figure 2 and 3).
Ye 11 219
We also performed the identical sensitivity analyses for neuropsychological test
220
scores. Throughout the three sensitivity analyses, the FBB+ DLB group had lower scores in
221
the Stroop color reading test and the FBB- DLB group had lower scores in the RCFT copy
222
and Stroop color reading test, compared to the AD group (Supplementary Tables 2-4).
223 224
4. Discussion
225
In this study, we evaluated the patterns of FDG metabolic changes in patients with DLB
226
whose diagnoses were supported by dopamine transporter imaging, and compared them with
227
those observed in AD. The major findings of this study are as follows. First, both the FBB+
228
DLB and FBB- DLB groups showed increased metabolism in the bilateral central cerebellum,
229
posterior putamen, somatomotor, and medial temporal cortices, compared to the control and
230
AD groups, whereas the AD group did not. Second, compared to the control group, the FBB+
231
DLB, FBB- DLB, and AD groups commonly exhibited a decreased metabolism in the
232
bilateral lateral temporal, temporo-parietal, posterior cingulate, and precuneus cortices. Third,
233
both the FBB+ DLB and FBB- DLB groups exhibited additional hypometabolism in the
234
bilateral thalami and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, compared to the control group; the
235
FBB+ DLB group had additional hypometabolism in the bilateral caudate nuclei and occipital
236
cortices, compared to the control and AD groups; whereas the AD group had an additional
237
hypometabolism in the bilateral entorhinal cortices and hippocampi compared to the control
238
and DLB groups. Taken together, our findings suggest that hypermetabolic or relatively
239
preserved metabolic patterns involving the somatomotor cortex, posterior putamen, and
240
central cerebellum could be a useful imaging biomarker suggesting DLB, and there are AD-
241
specific hypometabolic patterns involving entorhinal cortex and hippocampus; DLB-specific
242
hypometabolic patterns involving the thalamus, caudate nucleus, and occipital cortex; and
Ye 12 243
common hypometabolic patterns for AD and DLB involving the bilateral temporo-parietal,
244
posterior cingulate, and precuneus cortices.
245
In line with our hypothesis, the DLB group had an increased metabolism in the
246
bilateral central cerebellum, posterior putamen, and somatomotor cortices compared to the
247
control and AD groups. This result is consistent with the previously reported PD-related
248
spatial covariance pattern (PDRP) (Eckert et al., 2007). Cerebellar hypermetabolism in our
249
DLB group is partly consistent with the previously reported PD-related cognitive pattern
250
(PDCP) in non-demented PD patients (Huang et al., 2007). A recent study reported
251
significant correlation between cognitive dysfunction and hypermetabolism in the posterior
252
cerebellar vermis (Blum et al., 2018), and another study reported a significant negative
253
correlation between FDG uptake in the putamen and precentral gyrus and cognitive
254
dysfunction in non-demented and demented PD patients (Wu et al., 2018). Further, relative
255
preservation of metabolism in the sensorimotor cortices (Brown et al., 2014; Ishii et al., 1998)
256
and basal ganglia (Ishii et al., 1998) has been reported in DLB patients. Moreover, a previous
257
study showed that the metabolic increases in these brain regions are correlated with the
258
degree of nigrostriatal dopaminergic depletion (Holtbernd et al., 2015). Metabolic increase in
259
these brain regions could be interpreted as a compensatory mechanism. However, it also
260
could be interpreted as a pathophysiological change (Mirdamadi, 2016). Previous studies
261
showed that basal ganglia and cerebellar circuits are closely connected to form an integrated
262
network (Bostan and Strick, 2018), and that an increased cerebellar activity could potentiate
263
cortico-striatal synaptic pathways (Chen et al., 2014). As cerebellar cortex (especially the
264
vermis) is connected to the subthalamic nucleus via di-synaptic subcortical pathway (Bostan
265
and Strick, 2018), hyperactivity of the subthalamic nucleus in PD patients (Jahanshahi et al.,
266
2015) could be a potential biological source for these overall pathophysiological metabolic
267
changes. Hyperactivity of the subthalamic nucleus could be related to the increased cerebellar
Ye 13 268
activity, which in turn could be related to the potentiation of cortico-striatal pathways. Future
269
studies investigating the effects of metabolic increase in these brain regions on motor and
270
cognitive performance are warranted to confirm this hypothesis. Considering the
271
hypometabolism observed in the frontal and parietal association cortices in DLB patients
272
(Ishii et al., 1998), the relative and contrasted hypermetabolic pattern in the somatomotor
273
cortex could be useful in accurately detecting DLB patients using a visual FDG PET
274
interpretation (Brown et al., 2014).
275
Our second major finding is that FBB+ DLB, FBB- DLB and AD groups commonly
276
exhibit decreased metabolism in the bilateral lateral temporal, temporo-parietal, posterior
277
cingulate, and precuneus cortices, which suggests that these hypometabolic patterns could be
278
common imaging biomarkers for AD and DLB. The absence of a metabolic increase in the
279
posterior cingulate cortex is not consistent with the cingulate island sign in DLB (Graff-
280
Radford et al., 2014). However, relative hypermetabolism in the posterior cingulate cortex
281
was observed in the FBB+ DLB and FBB- DLB groups, compared to the AD group, although
282
statistical significance was not reached (Supplementary Figure 4 and Figure 1). Considering
283
that the posterior cingulate cortex is anatomically and functionally connected with medial
284
temporal lobe structures, cingulate island sign could be related with relative hypermetabolism
285
in the medial temporal lobe structures, including the hippocampus and amygdala, in DLB
286
patients (Figure 1). In view of our results, we suggest that the cingulate island sign could be
287
an imaging biomarker differentiating DLB from AD, but may be of little use in detecting
288
DLB. This point of view is consistent with a recent study showing that the cingulate island
289
sign is negatively associated with medial temporal lobe atrophy (Iizuka and Kameyama, 2016)
290
and temporal changes in DLB (Iizuka et al., 2017).
291 292
Our third major finding is that both FBB+ DLB and FBB- DLB groups exhibited an additional hypometabolism in the bilateral thalami and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices,
Ye 14 293
compared to the control group, while only the FBB+ DLB group exhibited hypometabolism
294
in the bilateral caudate nuclei and occipital cortices, compared to the control and AD groups.
295
Occipital hypometabolism is a well-known imaging biomarker for DLB (Ishii et al., 1998).
296
Although we cannot emphasize the absence of occipital hypometabolism in the FBB- DLB
297
group due to smaller sample size of the FBB- DLB group (N = 25), compared to the FBB+
298
DLB group (N = 38), occipital hypometabolism was less prominent than parietal
299
hypometabolism in both DLB groups (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 1).
300
The AD group had an additional hypometabolism in the bilateral entorhinal cortices
301
and hippocampi compared to the control and DLB groups. In contrast to the hypometabolism
302
in the lateral temporal, temporo-parietal, posterior cingulate, and precuneus cortices, which
303
were simultaneously observed in AD and DLB groups, the hypometabolism in the entorhinal
304
cortices and hippocampi was observed only in AD patients. Considering that entorhinal
305
hypometabolism was observed in AD patients (Mosconi et al., 2004), and successfully
306
predicted cognitive decline in elderly healthy subjects (de Leon et al., 2001; Ewers et al.,
307
2014), entorhinal hypometabolism could be an AD-specific metabolic biomarker that could
308
be used for the differential diagnosis of AD from DLB.
309
Compared to the AD group, the FBB+ DLB and FBB- DLB groups commonly
310
showed lower scores in COWAT phonemic and Stroop color reading tests, as well as higher
311
scores in SVLT delayed recall. The FBB- DLB group had lower scores than the AD group in
312
RCFT copy. These results are line with previous studies showing that DLB is characterized
313
by deficits in visuospatial and attention function, while AD is characterized by deficits in
314
memory function (Ferman et al., 2006; Guidi et al., 2006; Kraybill et al., 2005). Also, our
315
finding is consistent with a previous study showing that deficits in semantic fluency and
316
phonemic fluency tests are similar in DLB, while those in phonemic fluency test are
317
relatively preserved in AD (Lambon Ralph et al., 2001). However, the sensitivity analyses of
Ye 15 318
disease severity in the three disease groups (Supplementary Tables 2-4) consistently showed
319
that deficits in Stroop color reading test could be a neuropsychological hallmark
320
differentiating DLB from AD.
321
Our study has the following strengths. First, all DLB patients were confirmed with
322
abnormal FP-CIT PET results, which could increase the specificity of the diagnosis (Thomas
323
et al., 2017). Second, AD patients were carefully screened by semi-structured questionnaires
324
and a neurologic examination to rule out the possibility of concomitant LB pathologies and
325
were confirmed with FBB PET. Third, all DLB patients underwent FBB PET and we could
326
evaluate the metabolic patterns related with DLB diagnosis independent of cerebral β-
327
amyloid deposition. However, there are several limitations to this study. First, we did not
328
pathologically confirm the diagnosis of our patients. Although we increased the specificity of
329
our study participants using PET biomarkers, as about 10% of autopsy-confirmed DLB
330
patients have normal dopamine transporter uptake (Walker et al., 2007), there is a possibility
331
that some of our AD patients had clinically silent Lewy body pathology, such that our results
332
should be interpreted cautiously. Second, as the DLB group had relatively higher metabolism
333
in the cerebellum and pons, compared to the control group and AD group, use of the
334
cerebellar cortex as a reference ROI could underestimate hypermetabolic patterns in DLB
335
patients. Even with these limitations, our results suggest that hypermetabolism in the
336
somatomotor cortex, posterior putamen, and central cerebellum is a useful imaging biomarker
337
for DLB patients. Further, hypometabolism in the temporo-parietal, posterior cingulate, and
338
precuneus cortices could be common metabolic patterns of AD and DLB, while
339
entorhinal/hippocampal hypometabolism could be a specific biomarker for AD.
340
Ye 16 341
Acknowledgements
342
Funding sources for study: This research was supported by the National Research Foundation
343
of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2019R1I1A1A01059454 and NRF-
344
2018M3C7A1056898).
345 346
Financial Disclosures of all authors
347
Nothing to report.
348 349 350
Ye 17 351
References
352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397
Albert, M.S., DeKosky, S.T., Dickson, D., Dubois, B., Feldman, H.H., Fox, N.C., Gamst, A., Holtzman, D.M., Jagust, W.J., Petersen, R.C., Snyder, P.J., Carrillo, M.C., Thies, B., Phelps, C.H., 2011. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7, 270-279. Barthel, H., Gertz, H.J., Dresel, S., Peters, O., Bartenstein, P., Buerger, K., Hiemeyer, F., Wittemer-Rump, S.M., Seibyl, J., Reininger, C., Sabri, O., 2011. Cerebral amyloidbeta PET with florbetaben (18F) in patients with Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls: a multicentre phase 2 diagnostic study. Lancet Neurol 10, 424-435. Blum, D., la Fougere, C., Pilotto, A., Maetzler, W., Berg, D., Reimold, M., Liepelt-Scarfone, I., 2018. Hypermetabolism in the cerebellum and brainstem and cortical hypometabolism are independently associated with cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 2387-2395. Bostan, A.C., Strick, P.L., 2018. The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network. Nat Rev Neurosci 19, 338-350. Brown, R.K., Bohnen, N.I., Wong, K.K., Minoshima, S., Frey, K.A., 2014. Brain PET in suspected dementia: patterns of altered FDG metabolism. Radiographics 34, 684-701. Chen, C.H., Fremont, R., Arteaga-Bracho, E.E., Khodakhah, K., 2014. Short latency cerebellar modulation of the basal ganglia. Nat Neurosci 17, 1767-1775. Chung, E.J., Babulal, G.M., Monsell, S.E., Cairns, N.J., Roe, C.M., Morris, J.C., 2015. Clinical Features of Alzheimer Disease With and Without Lewy Bodies. JAMA Neurol 72, 789-796. de Leon, M.J., Convit, A., Wolf, O.T., Tarshish, C.Y., DeSanti, S., Rusinek, H., Tsui, W., Kandil, E., Scherer, A.J., Roche, A., Imossi, A., Thorn, E., Bobinski, M., Caraos, C., Lesbre, P., Schlyer, D., Poirier, J., Reisberg, B., Fowler, J., 2001. Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-Dglucose/poitron-emission tomography (FDG/PET). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 10966-10971. Della Rosa, P.A., Cerami, C., Gallivanone, F., Prestia, A., Caroli, A., Castiglioni, I., Gilardi, M.C., Frisoni, G., Friston, K., Ashburner, J., Perani, D., Consortium, E.-P., 2014. A standardized [18F]-FDG-PET template for spatial normalization in statistical parametric mapping of dementia. Neuroinformatics 12, 575-593. Ditter, S.M., Mirra, S.S., 1987. Neuropathologic and clinical features of Parkinson's disease in Alzheimer's disease patients. Neurology 37, 754-760. Eckert, T., Tang, C., Eidelberg, D., 2007. Assessment of the progression of Parkinson's disease: a metabolic network approach. Lancet Neurol 6, 926-932. Eidelberg, D., 2009. Metabolic brain networks in neurodegenerative disorders: a functional imaging approach. Trends Neurosci 32, 548-557. Ewers, M., Brendel, M., Rizk-Jackson, A., Rominger, A., Bartenstein, P., Schuff, N., Weiner, M.W., 2014. Reduced FDG-PET brain metabolism and executive function predict clinical progression in elderly healthy subjects. NeuroImage. Clinical 4, 45-52. Ferman, T.J., Smith, G.E., Boeve, B.F., Graff-Radford, N.R., Lucas, J.A., Knopman, D.S., Petersen, R.C., Ivnik, R.J., Wszolek, Z., Uitti, R., Dickson, D.W., 2006. Neuropsychological differentiation of dementia with Lewy bodies from normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Clin Neuropsychol 20, 623-636.
Ye 18 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445
Graff-Radford, J., Murray, M.E., Lowe, V.J., Boeve, B.F., Ferman, T.J., Przybelski, S.A., Lesnick, T.G., Senjem, M.L., Gunter, J.L., Smith, G.E., Knopman, D.S., Jack, C.R., Jr., Dickson, D.W., Petersen, R.C., Kantarci, K., 2014. Dementia with Lewy bodies: basis of cingulate island sign. Neurology 83, 801-809. Guidi, M., Paciaroni, L., Paolini, S., De Padova, S., Scarpino, O., 2006. Differences and similarities in the neuropsychological profile of dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease in the early stage. J Neurol Sci 248, 120-123. Hansen, L., Salmon, D., Galasko, D., Masliah, E., Katzman, R., DeTeresa, R., Thal, L., Pay, M.M., Hofstetter, R., Klauber, M., et al., 1990. The Lewy body variant of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical and pathologic entity. Neurology 40, 1-8. Holtbernd, F., Ma, Y., Peng, S., Schwartz, F., Timmermann, L., Kracht, L., Fink, G.R., Tang, C.C., Eidelberg, D., Eggers, C., 2015. Dopaminergic correlates of metabolic network activity in Parkinson's disease. Hum Brain Mapp 36, 3575-3585. Huang, C., Mattis, P., Tang, C., Perrine, K., Carbon, M., Eidelberg, D., 2007. Metabolic brain networks associated with cognitive function in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 34, 714-723. Iizuka, T., Iizuka, R., Kameyama, M., 2017. Cingulate island sign temporally changes in dementia with Lewy bodies. Sci Rep 7, 14745. Iizuka, T., Kameyama, M., 2016. Cingulate island sign on FDG-PET is associated with medial temporal lobe atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies. Ann Nucl Med 30, 421429. Irwin, D.J., Grossman, M., Weintraub, D., Hurtig, H.I., Duda, J.E., Xie, S.X., Lee, E.B., Van Deerlin, V.M., Lopez, O.L., Kofler, J.K., Nelson, P.T., Jicha, G.A., Woltjer, R., Quinn, J.F., Kaye, J., Leverenz, J.B., Tsuang, D., Longfellow, K., Yearout, D., Kukull, W., Keene, C.D., Montine, T.J., Zabetian, C.P., Trojanowski, J.Q., 2017. Neuropathological and genetic correlates of survival and dementia onset in synucleinopathies: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol 16, 55-65. Ishii, K., Imamura, T., Sasaki, M., Yamaji, S., Sakamoto, S., Kitagaki, H., Hashimoto, M., Hirono, N., Shimomura, T., Mori, E., 1998. Regional cerebral glucose metabolism in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 51, 125-130. Jahanshahi, M., Obeso, I., Baunez, C., Alegre, M., Krack, P., 2015. Parkinson's disease, the subthalamic nucleus, inhibition, and impulsivity. Mov Disord 30, 128-140. Kiebel, S.J., Kherif, A.P., Holmes, C. 2007. CHAPTER 8 - The General Linear Model. in: Friston, K., Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nichols, T., Penny, W. (Eds.). Statistical Parametric Mapping. Academic Press, London, pp 101-125. Kraybill, M.L., Larson, E.B., Tsuang, D.W., Teri, L., McCormick, W.C., Bowen, J.D., Kukull, W.A., Leverenz, J.B., Cherrier, M.M., 2005. Cognitive differences in dementia patients with autopsy-verified AD, Lewy body pathology, or both. Neurology 64, 2069-2073. Lambon Ralph, M.A., Powell, J., Howard, D., Whitworth, A.B., Garrard, P., Hodges, J.R., 2001. Semantic memory is impaired in both dementia with Lewy bodies and dementia of Alzheimer's type: a comparative neuropsychological study and literature review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70, 149-156. Lee, Y.G., Jeon, S., Yoo, H.S., Chung, S.J., Lee, S.K., Lee, P.H., Sohn, Y.H., Yun, M., Evans, A.C., Ye, B.S., 2018. Amyloid-beta-related and unrelated cortical thinning in dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurobiol Aging 72, 32-39. Lemstra, A.W., de Beer, M.H., Teunissen, C.E., Schreuder, C., Scheltens, P., van der Flier, W.M., Sikkes, S.A., 2017. Concomitant AD pathology affects clinical manifestation
Ye 19 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493
and survival in dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 88, 113118. Leverenz, J., Sumi, S.M., 1986. Parkinson's disease in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol 43, 662-664. McKeith, I., O'Brien, J., Walker, Z., Tatsch, K., Booij, J., Darcourt, J., Padovani, A., Giubbini, R., Bonuccelli, U., Volterrani, D., Holmes, C., Kemp, P., Tabet, N., Meyer, I., Reininger, C., 2007. Sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase III, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 6, 305-313. McKeith, I.G., Boeve, B.F., Dickson, D.W., Halliday, G., Taylor, J.P., Weintraub, D., Aarsland, D., Galvin, J., Attems, J., Ballard, C.G., Bayston, A., Beach, T.G., Blanc, F., Bohnen, N., Bonanni, L., Bras, J., Brundin, P., Burn, D., Chen-Plotkin, A., Duda, J.E., El-Agnaf, O., Feldman, H., Ferman, T.J., Ffytche, D., Fujishiro, H., Galasko, D., Goldman, J.G., Gomperts, S.N., Graff-Radford, N.R., Honig, L.S., Iranzo, A., Kantarci, K., Kaufer, D., Kukull, W., Lee, V.M.Y., Leverenz, J.B., Lewis, S., Lippa, C., Lunde, A., Masellis, M., Masliah, E., McLean, P., Mollenhauer, B., Montine, T.J., Moreno, E., Mori, E., Murray, M., O'Brien, J.T., Orimo, S., Postuma, R.B., Ramaswamy, S., Ross, O.A., Salmon, D.P., Singleton, A., Taylor, A., Thomas, A., Tiraboschi, P., Toledo, J.B., Trojanowski, J.Q., Tsuang, D., Walker, Z., Yamada, M., Kosaka, K., 2017. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 89, 88-100. McKhann, G.M., Knopman, D.S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B.T., Jack, C.R., Jr., Kawas, C.H., Klunk, W.E., Koroshetz, W.J., Manly, J.J., Mayeux, R., Mohs, R.C., Morris, J.C., Rossor, M.N., Scheltens, P., Carrillo, M.C., Thies, B., Weintraub, S., Phelps, C.H., 2011. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7, 263-269. Minoshima, S., Foster, N.L., Sima, A.A., Frey, K.A., Albin, R.L., Kuhl, D.E., 2001. Alzheimer's disease versus dementia with Lewy bodies: cerebral metabolic distinction with autopsy confirmation. Ann Neurol 50, 358-365. Mirdamadi, J.L., 2016. Cerebellar role in Parkinson's disease. J Neurophysiol 116, 917-919. Mosconi, L., Pupi, A., De Cristofaro, M.T., Fayyaz, M., Sorbi, S., Herholz, K., 2004. Functional interactions of the entorhinal cortex: an 18F-FDG PET study on normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 45, 382-392. Nelson, P.T., Jicha, G.A., Kryscio, R.J., Abner, E.L., Schmitt, F.A., Cooper, G., Xu, L.O., Smith, C.D., Markesbery, W.R., 2010. Low sensitivity in clinical diagnoses of dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neurol 257, 359-366. Oh, M., Kim, J.S., Kim, J.Y., Shin, K.H., Park, S.H., Kim, H.O., Moon, D.H., Oh, S.J., Chung, S.J., Lee, C.S., 2012. Subregional patterns of preferential striatal dopamine transporter loss differ in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple-system atrophy. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 53, 399-406. Perani, D., Della Rosa, P.A., Cerami, C., Gallivanone, F., Fallanca, F., Vanoli, E.G., Panzacchi, A., Nobili, F., Pappata, S., Marcone, A., Garibotto, V., Castiglioni, I., Magnani, G., Cappa, S.F., Gianolli, L., Consortium, E.-P., 2014. Validation of an optimized SPM procedure for FDG-PET in dementia diagnosis in a clinical setting. NeuroImage. Clinical 6, 445-454.
Ye 20 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511
Perry, R.H., Irving, D., Blessed, G., Fairbairn, A., Perry, E.K., 1990. Senile dementia of Lewy body type. A clinically and neuropathologically distinct form of Lewy body dementia in the elderly. J Neurol Sci 95, 119-139. Petersen, R.C., Smith, G.E., Waring, S.C., Ivnik, R.J., Tangalos, E.G., Kokmen, E., 1999. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 56, 303-308. Thomas, A.J., Attems, J., Colloby, S.J., O'Brien, J.T., McKeith, I., Walker, R., Lee, L., Burn, D., Lett, D.J., Walker, Z., 2017. Autopsy validation of 123I-FP-CIT dopaminergic neuroimaging for the diagnosis of DLB. Neurology 88, 276-283. Walker, Z., Jaros, E., Walker, R.W., Lee, L., Costa, D.C., Livingston, G., Ince, P.G., Perry, R., McKeith, I., Katona, C.L., 2007. Dementia with Lewy bodies: a comparison of clinical diagnosis, FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography imaging and autopsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78, 1176-1181. Wu, L., Liu, F.T., Ge, J.J., Zhao, J., Tang, Y.L., Yu, W.B., Yu, H., Anderson, T., Zuo, C.T., Chen, L., Wang, J., 2018. Clinical characteristics of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease and its related pattern in (18) F-FDG PET imaging. Hum Brain Mapp doi: 10.1002/hbm.24311.
Ye 21 512
Figure legends
513 514
Figure 1. Comparison of regional glucose metabolism between FBB+ DLB, FBB- DLB, AD
515
and control groups
516
Results are based on general linear models controlling for age, sex, and education. The FDR
517
method was used for multiple comparison correction across multiple voxels (A-F). The brain
518
images are displayed in neurological convention. Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease;
519
DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; FBB, 18F-Florbetaben; FDR, false discovery rate.
Ye 22 520
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study subjects Pa
Pb
70.8 (7.5)f
0.022
0.017
11 (44.0)f
27 (71.1)e, f
0.066
0.034
11.0 (5.3)
8.8 (5.9)
9.8 (4.8)
0.059
0.276
2.5 (1.4)
2.2 (1.1)
2.9 (1.9)
NA
0.163
NA
0.078
Control
FBB+ DLB
FBB- DLB
AD
N
21
38
25
38
Age, years
71.8 (5.3)
73.6 (7.9)
76.3 (6.2)c, f
Sex, female
13 (61.9)
17 (44.7)e
Education, years
12.8 (5.2)
Disease duration, years
NA
Disease stage Non-demented
NA
13 (34.2)
9 (36.0)
22 (57.9)
Demented
NA
25 (65.8)
16 (64.0)
16 (42.1)
Hypertension
6 (28.6)
17 (44.7)
14 (56.0)
16 (42.1)
0.315
0.535
Diabetes mellitus
3 (14.3)
10 (26.3)
10 (40.0)
8 (21.1)
0.206
0.251
Coronary heart disease
2 (9.5)
5 (13.2)
4 (16.0)
4 (10.5)
0.927
0.929
Hyperlipidemia
8 (38.1)
16 (42.1)
10 (40.0)
16 (42.1)
0.989
0.983
Parkinsonism
NA
32 (84.2)e
22 (88.0)f
4 (10.5)e, f
NA
< 0.001
Cognitive fluctuation
NA
23 (60.5)e
17 (68.0)f
3 (7.9)e, f
NA
< 0.001
Visual hallucination
NA
9 (23.7)e
8 (32.0)f
0e, f
NA
0.001
RBD
NA
21 (55.3)e
14 (56.0)f
3 (7.9)e, f
NA
< 0.001
CCSIT score
NA
4.6 (2.4)e
5.5 (2.6)f
7.1 (2.3)e, f
NA
< 0.001
UDPRS motor
NA
25.1 (14.3)e
26.6 (10.2)f
6.6 (5.9)e, f
NA
< 0.001
CDR-SOB
0
5.3 (3.6)c, e
4.5 (3.2)c, f
2.9 (2.1)c, e, f
< 0.001
0.003
K-MMSE
28.5 (1.4)
21.1 (5.4)c
20.8 (4.6)c
22.0 (3.8)c
< 0.001
0.537
Cardiovascular risk factors
Caregiver reported symptoms
521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529
Data are expressed as a mean (SD) or number (%). Key: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; CCSIT, cross-cultural smell identification test; CDR-SOB, clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; FBB, 18FFlorbetaben; K-MMSE, Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination; RBD, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder; UPDRS, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale a P values are results of analyses of variance or chi-square tests as appropriate comparing control, FBB+ DLB, FBB- DLB, and AD groups. b P values are results of independent t-tests or chi-square tests as appropriate comparing FBB+DLB, FBB- DLB, and AD groups.
Ye 23 530 531 532
Significant difference in comparisons with the control group,c between the FBB+ DLB and FBB- DLB groups,d between the FBB+ DLB and AD groups,e and between the FBB- DLB and AD groups.f
Ye 24 533
Table 2. Comparison of standardized neuropsychological test scores Neuropsychological test
534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544
Control
FBB+ DLB
FBB- DLB
AD
Digit span backward
0.87 (1.33)
-0.92 (1.18)a
-0.95 (1.54)a
-0.31 (1.04)a
K-BNT
0.36 (0.70)
-1.50 (1.54)a
-1.44 (2.25)a
-0.99 (1.25)a
RCFT copy
0.50 (0.55)
-1.99 (2.42)a
-2.93 (4.20)a, c
-0.99 (1.33)a, c
SVLT immediate recall
0.72 (0.80)
-1.71 (1.04)a
-1.34 (0.97)a
-1.20 (0.87)a
SVLT delayed recall
0.76 (0.84)
-1.73 (1.10)a, b
-1.61 (0.99)a, c
-2.28 (0.76)a, b, c
SVLT recognition score
0.54 (0.82)
-1.48 (1.18)a
-1.65 (1.91)a
-1.97 (1.47)a
RCFT immediate recall
0.21 (0.88)
-1.46 (0.73)a
-1.29 (0.98)a
-1.52 (0.79)a
RCFT delayed recall
0.21 (0.66)
-1.65 (0.83)a
-1.36 (1.12)a
-1.68 (0.81)a
RCFT recognition score
0.11 (0.91)
-1.53 (1.37)a
-0.98 (1.58)a
-1.39 (1.41)a
COWAT animal
0.31 (1.10)
-1.39 (0.98)a
-1.48 (1.08)a
-0.87 (1.02)a
COWAT supermarket
0.05 (0.83)
-1.39 (0.72)a
-1.35 (1.11)a
-1.05 (0.65)a
COWAT phonemic
0.32 (0.75)
-1.43 (0.92)a, b
-1.16 (1.30)a, c
-0.32 (0.92)a, b, c
Stroop test color reading
0.16 (0.94)
-2.23 (1.33)a, b
-2.26 (1.44)a, c
-0.96 (1.33)a, b, c
Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation). Key: K-BNT, Korean version of Boston Naming Test; RCFT, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; SVLT, Seoul Verbal Learning Test; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test Data represent results of general linear models for standardized neuropsychological test scores comparing the control, FBB+ DLB, FBB- DLB, and AD groups after controlling for age, sex, and education. Significant difference in comparisons with the control groupa, between the FBB+ DLB group and the AD groupb, and between the FBB- DLB and the AD groupc after false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons across 13 neuropsychological tests.
•
There is a DLB-specific hypermetabolic pattern compared to AD and controls
•
The pattern involves somatomotor cortex, posterior putamen, and central cerebellum
•
Metabolism in the parietal lobe is commonly decreased in DLB and AD
•
AD-specific hypometabolism involves the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus