Chemosphere, Vol.18, Nos.9/10, Printed in Great Britain
DISTRIBUTION
pp
OF PHENMEDIPHAH CHENOPODIUH
2077-2082,
1989
0045-6535/89 $3.00 Pergamon Press plc
AND OTHER BISCARBAMATES ALBUM AND SPINACIA
INSIDE LEAF FRAGMENTS
OLERACEA
+
OF
PLANTS
by S. Mona (II). J.M. Ducruet(2),
F. Nurit(1).
P. Ravanel(3)
and M. Tissut (I
(I) Laboratoire de Physiologie cellulaire v@g~tale, Universit~ Joseph Fourier BP 53×, 38041 Grenoble c~dex. France. (2) Laboratoire de Biophysique. Centre d'Etudes Nucl~aires de Saclay. 9 1 1 9 1 G i f sur Yvette c~dex. France. (3) Laboratoire de Pharmacoonosie. Universit@ Joseph Fourier. Domaine de La Merci, 38700, La Tronche, France
The
target of the herbicide
PS II level I. Furthermore. phenylureas
for
phenmedipham under
binding
are
conditions
phenmedipham
we have previously on
the
QB
bound
to purified
where
electron
as
other
part
present
shown
by
competition
is associated
study
thylakoids,
and the amount
of the mesophyll
cuticule
the
thylakoids
DI
with
II
It
the amount
conditions which exclude
remains
that
I mg
is clearly
2
One
bound
the herbicide
Among
to the QB that
the
of
the
purpose
of phenmedipham associated
nmoles
chlorophyll,
is suggested
phospholipids.
when
and
to
at the
competes with
is fully inhibited.
diuron.
thylakoidal
tissues
PS
(1.5 nmole)
of this product which foliar
chloroplasts
polypeptide
corresponding
through
experiments the
nside
shown 2 that phenmedipham
the ratio between
cells and
out under experimental
on
a fraction
with
is to measure
site
transfer
these 2 nmoles mg -I chlorophyll, site,
is located
bound
to other
treatment
to
parts
is carried
the limiting step represented
by the
penetration.
Very
little
herbicides
in
information
the
represents
a first
inhibitor
generally
out for this work. was obtained
apoplastic attempt applied First,
and
to foliage penetration
this problem
of
This
of
study
without
Two methods were cuticular
(0.5 cm x I cm) by vacuum
the stomatal
2077
mesophyll.
purposes.
of phenmedipham
whatever
the
the distribution
in the case of a photosynthesis
for agronomic
allowed
of phenmedipham
concerning
parts
of standard size
This treatment
solution
available,
symplastic
to clarify
in leaf fragments
(6.2 Pa pressure). the aqueous
is presently
chambers
its concentration.
set
limitation treatment
to be filled up with
.OO
2078
Secondly, we carried out a determination
of the
inhibition by phenmedipham
of the
photosynthesis rate in leaf fragments, with particular care to establish the minimum amount of product
introduced
complete.
conditions
These
correspond
to
the
inside the of
appearance
leaf,
almost of
complete
toxic
fluorescence changes and photodestruction of P S ]
for which
inhibition
inhibition
symptoms
in
percentage was
of
photosynthesis
=
diuron-induced
plants
of pigments associated with an inhibition
cyclic electron flow3.
Photosynthesis oxygen emission
inhibition was measured by two methods
on PS
obtained
by
and
:
a. leaf fluorescence has been used to detect photosynthesis acting
: leaf fluorescence
114,5.
The
short-term
quantitative fluorescence
estimation
inhibition by herbicides
of such
measurements
an
on whole
inhibition leaves
or
can on
be
leaf
fragments, by determination of the FI/FP ratio, following Cadahia et al.5; b. photosynthesis polarographic
intensity
and
measurements
of
inhibitory
effects
light-dependent
02
were
carried
evolution,
out as
through
previously
described6. The treated
two methods were for
half
biscarbamate
for
hour
in vacuo,
derivatives (table
as surfactant water
an
tested comparatively
30
(figure to
60
I). The
with
on leaf fragments
phenmedipham
but
of standard
also
with
I), with or without
addition of 0.3% of
low pressure exposure
of leaf fragments
minutes,
did
not
induce
significant
changes
photosynthetic rate.
TABLE !
CHEMICALSTRUCTURES~ D COMMONI~ES OF THE DIFFERENTBIBCARBAMATEDERIVATIVES STUDIED.
~NH-COO-RI
R!
R2
R3
Name
CH3 CIt3 CH3 CH3 C2H5
H H C1 fl H
CH3 C1 C1 CF3 H
Phenmed i ph 3-CI 3,4-di C1 3-CF3 De~ediph~
four
size, other
isophorone immersed of
in
their
2079
Figure
I - Percentage of photosynthesis
(abscissa)
or fluorescence
inhibition determined by oxygen emission
induction (ordinate),
for different phenylcarbamates
at I0 or I00 HH, in the presence or absence of isophorone.
Chenopodi.um album
leaves. B:
I0 pH without
O:
I00 pH without
I : desmedipham
isophorone, isophorone,
; 2 : 3-Cl
A:
id. with
isophorone
~:
id. with
isophorone
; 3 : 3,4-diCl
; 4 : phenmedipham
Treatments with I00 Ftl herbicide and isophorone
induced a total
except fop compound 2. Average of 4 measurements,
'°°[ %
" T
; 5 : 3-CF 3 inhibition,
bars z~ ~.
[[ 2
5
//
,,/,
/,
(9 0t'-"
/
/
/
/
(1)
0 u) 5 O 'L_
0
1
I 5O
oxygen
i 100 %
2080
Figure
I shows that
measurement, isophorone
with
100%
inhibition
one exception which
0.3%.
The
inhibition
is the 3-Cl
percentage
generally higher than through 02 emission rates.
This
can
be explained
(II0 O) was obtained by both methods
by
derivative,
measured
intensity
the fact
that
in the presence
through
fluorescence
of of was
particularly for low inhibition
fluorescence
I level
is directly
related to the proportion of herbicide-blocked centers, hence to the real inhibition of
PS
II
electron
photosynthetic
electron
conditions of medium compare
transfer,
whereas
transport,
to strong
the percentage
in
oxygen which
evolution
PS
II
is
not
light and low proportion
inhibitions
(0 and
reflects a
limiting
100% excluded)
obtained
+ 15 (at a level of 5%). The same experiment was repeated with Standard
leaf
fragments
of
Chen opodium
album
and
of
close
to
100%
through
fluorescence
measurement,
step
and
in
If we
by each method, interval equal
to
14C phenmedipham
90
Spinacia
floated in vacuo for one hour. At this stage, photosynthesis be
overall
of blocked centers.
the average difference between them was 39% with a 95% confidence
~M.
the
oleracea
were
inhibition was shown to to
90%
by
02
evolution
determination. The treated fragments were rapidly washed with water and ethanol 30% and
ground
labelled
in 98%
ethanol.
phenmedi pham
After
was
centrifugation,
dissolved
in
determination of the phenmedipham content scintillation
counting.
Under
these
it was
the
shown
supernatant.
that
95"/. of
After
the
dilution,
n the leaf fragments was achieved through
conditions,
we
could
compare
the
amount
of
phenmedipham found in isolated thylakoids and class A chloroplasts 2 to the amount of the herbicide remaining in leaf fragments. TABLE 2
~,MOONT OF PHENMEDIPI~M (nmoles) GIVING A 100% INHIBITION OF THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC ELECTRON TRanSFER PER MG CHLOROPHYL IN PURIFIED THYLAKOIDS I PURIFIED CLASS A CHLOROPLA~S AND LEAF FRAi3MENTS.
Thylakoids
Class A 0.5 x I cm leaf Chloroplasts fragments
Thyl.I/ f Class A
Class A j J
leaf
Thyl.j Jleaf
Spinacia 01eracea
2.0 ~ 0.4
4.8 ~ 0.3
15.9 ~ I
42X.
30%
I~
Chenopodium album
2.1 L 0.2
4.8 L 0.3
18.0 L 1.3
44%
2T~
11%
2081
The compared
increase
to thylakoids
herbicide
is
bound
phospholipids 2. A
]n
part
herbicide
can
plasmalemma, the
walls
0.3%
of
although
probably
This might
explain
I. This
was
effect was
found
to
fragments
that
would
solutions
increases
isolated
chloroplasts
effect
on
the amount
induces
ratio
between
the amounts
reaches
ratio between
close
as
between
volume,
the the
through
solution vacuum
the true concentration
action,
the
of herbicide
isophorone,
in
the
transfer
leading
from
Under
our
This
the same
means
leaf
not
but
part
of
the
the free
in the aqueous
phase
Ii00
that
the
in
ratio
fragments, as
This difference from
In
and 90 ~M.
of magnitude
result
from
the
and foliar
order
stomatal
phenmedipham
0.3 ~M
inhibition.
does
by
We
penetration
conditions,
respectively 300.
the
leaf fragments.
filled
2.
Chenopodium)
to a further
space
In
herbicide
chloroplasts.
isolated
to
which
to
were
inside
barrier
bound
therefore
and
droplets.
for
apoplastic
process
part
chlorophyll
needed for a 100%
penetration
apoplastic lipid
increase
easier
is not of
(mitochondria,
the same as for table
in class A chloroplasts
to I/3
the
14C phenmedipham.
to the inside of the
fragments is
exactly
In
to
lipophilic
hydrophilic
with
membrane
mg-!
is added.
Ii00
the concentrations
much
the
in leaf two
a
solution
of phenmedipham
a value
surprising
equilibrium
these
nmoles
to the cells,
that
inside
the
is bound
the
the
effect of
two-fold
2.5
isophorone
and
a
!
mean
when
in
In
important
were
of
membranes
also demonstrated
result
from the external
cell
the powerful
conditions
the
elsewhere.
concentration
as
lipophilic
150 , 75Z of
with
located
concentrate
(35
0.3%
are
membrane...).
an
the
of phenmedipham
different
certainly
or from the xylem vessels
terms,
Hence,
can
parts
nuclear
at
of this
associated
part
the major
in the
reticulum,
isophorone
of the product,
limited
found
is
one
other
fragment,
the experimental
leaf
that
chambers
not
be
it w~s without
suggest
which
leaf
three
of part
thylaRoid,
25%
when
constitute
movement.
this last case,
content
the
to
In the and
fragment,
phenmedipham
in figure
Isophorone
two
certainly
cell
is seen
between
leaf
protein
bound to class A chloroplasts
by the binding
envelope.
QB
endoplasmic
phenmedipham
The
the
the
of
leaf,
However,
other
to
chloroplasts,
symplastic
of
can be explained
to the chloroplast
product
class
in the amount of phenmedipham
a
the is
diffusion
introduction
of
apoplastic
space.
inside
the leaf
a
is
2082
much lower
than 90 ~M, since
it has been depleted by partition
into the membrane
and binding to the QB site. Taking this hypothesis as true, the
volume
of
the
phenmedipham
it becomes possible
solution
•
which
was
to evaluate approximately
introduced
inside
the
leaf
q
through vacuum treatment
:
¥=
[c] q C v
q =
: amount of product inside the leaf. At Ii00, q is 15.9 nmoles per chlorophyll in spinach. : concentration of the solution in which leaf fragments were soaked. the Ii00, it is 90 ~M in spinach. : volume of this solution introduced inside the fragments.
m9 At
In the case of our phenmedipham treatments of spinach leaves,
[C~ was 90 ~M,
0.52
relation
nmoles/fragment
containing
0.033
mg
chlorophyll.
The
gives
therefore a value of 5.8 ~l for v, which represents approximatly 32% of the total volume of the leaf. Such a value to
vacuum
is in agreement with the weight infiltration
(data
not
shown).
increase of the fragments As
a
whole,
it
is
in reponse
interesting
to
underline that for phenmedipham, when one part reaches the QB site, 7.6 others are distributed presumably
throughout
the leaf, among which
associated with
the lipophilic
amount of an herbicide within of action
is an
can be found the fraction of product
space. The
relation
between
the
total
the leaf and its fraction really bound to the site
important parameter
to explain the activity of a PS 11 herbicide
on whole plants in terms of their inhibitory power on isolated chloroplasts.
REFERENCES
I. A. Trebst, E. Ristorius, G. Boroschewski
and H. Schultz -
Z. Naturforsch.,
1968, 23b, 342-348. 2. P. Ravanel, M. Tissut, F. Nurit et S. Mona - Weed Res., submitted. 3. S.M. Ridley and P. Horton - Z. Naturforsch.,
1984, 394, 351-353.
4. C.D. Miles and D.J. Daniel - Plant Sci. Letters, 1973, l, 2375. E. Cadahia E., J.M. Ducruet and P. Gaillardon - Chemosphere,
1982, l.._!,445-450.
6. O. Belbachir, M. Matringe, M. Tissut et D. Chevallier - Pest. Biochem. and Physiol., (Received
1980, 14, 303-308.
in UK
1 March
1989)