Do we have to get rid of mosquitoes to eliminate malaria?

Do we have to get rid of mosquitoes to eliminate malaria?

Insects: Friends, foes, and models/Insectes : amis, ennemis et modèles / C. R. Biologies 342 (2019) 247–278 Session V. Vector insects and transmissio...

323KB Sizes 0 Downloads 26 Views

Insects: Friends, foes, and models/Insectes : amis, ennemis et modèles / C. R. Biologies 342 (2019) 247–278

Session V. Vector insects and transmission of diseases

269

to malaria parasites in Anopheles gambiae, Science 326 (2009) 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2019.09.022

21

22

Do we have to get rid of mosquitoes to eliminate malaria?

Human activities and climate change in the emergence of vector-borne diseases

Markus Gildenhardt , Elena Levashina ∗ Vector Biology Unit, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (E. Levashina) Malaria is a local disease with global impact. The fitness of vector-borne Plasmodium parasites, the causative agents of malaria, is closely linked to the ecology and evolution of its mosquito vector. Ongoing adaptive radiation and introgression diversify mosquito populations in Africa. However, whether the genetic structure of vector populations impacts malaria transmission remains unknown. We discuss below new approaches that gauge the contribution of mosquito species to Plasmodium abundance in nature, with a particular focus on time-series analyses in the context of population genetics and epidemiology [1]. Our data highlighted the importance of focusing vector control strategies on mosquito species that drive malaria dynamics. Using timeseries collections and the econometric approach Granger causality, we demonstrated that the abundance of Plasmodium-infected mosquitoes in a field site in Mali was driven by only one of the two sympatric vectors (Fig. 1). This mosquito species carried a susceptible allele of the known antiparasitic gene TEP1 [2,3], and until now it was resistant to colonization efforts and, therefore, is not the target of current gene drive applications. Extending such studies to other key components of vectorial capacity and epidemiological and parasitological surveys should ultimately identify patterns, tipping points, and general laws that describe dynamics, emergence, and resurgence of mosquito-borne diseases.

Fig. 1

Anna-Bella Failloux Arboviruses and Insect Vectors Laboratory, Department of Virology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France E-mail address: [email protected] Because of human population expansion and activities, arthropodborne viruses (arboviruses) have increased in importance during these last decades. Arboviruses are maintained by alternate replication in both vertebrate hosts and arthropod vectors. Successful transmission relies on a complex life cycle in the vector, which starts when a competent arthropod ingests an infectious blood meal from a viremic vertebrate host. Following an extrinsic incubation time during which the virus replicates in the vector midgut, followed by systemic viral dissemination to the salivary glands, the vector can transmit the virus to a new naïve host. Whereas they typically cause self-limiting, acute infections in their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses establish persistent infections in their vectors. Arboviruses are typically maintained within an enzootic cycle between wild animals and vectors. As human populations encroach on regions where these diseases are endemic, spillover transmission to humans and domestic animals can lead to large-scale disease outbreaks affecting millions of people. Dengue, chikungunya, Zika, and yellow fever mainly use humans as amplification hosts. Extensive urbanization combined with increased commerce and travel give rise to the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, both highly adapted to the human environment. The high densities of these human-biting mosquitoes that proliferate in highly populated cities made the bed to explosive outbreaks of arboviral diseases. As insects are ectothermic organisms, climate change may affect the geographical distribution of vectors, with consequences on the transmission of arboviruses. Yellow fever (YF) is a good example of an emerging arbovirus, as it illustrates three main steps in the emergence: – i*ntroduction of a new pathogen in a new environment causing urban outbreaks; – spillback of this pathogen into the wild initiating an enzootic cycle; – the spillover of this pathogen from an enzootic cycle to initiate an urban cycle (Fig. 1). YF (YFV, Flavivirus, Flaviviridae) is a disease endemic to tropical regions of Africa and South America. There are seven lineages: five in Africa and two in America. Each year, 200,000 cases and 30,000 deaths were reported. In 2016, YFV emerged in Angola and imported cases were detected outside Africa, posing the threat

Granger causality

Disclosure of interest peting interest.

The authors declare that they have no com-

References [1] M. Gildenhard, E.K. Rono, A. Diarra, et al., Mosquito microevolution drives Plasmodium falciparum dynamics, Nat. Microbiol. 4 (6) (2018) 941–947. [2] S. Blandin, S.-H. Shiao, L.F. Moita, C.J. Janse, A.P. Waters, F.C. Kafatos, et al., Complement-like protein TEP1 is a determinant of vectorial capacity in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae, Cell 116 (2004) 661–670. [3] S.A. Blandin, R. Wang-Sattler, M. Lamacchia, J. Gagneur, G. Lycett, Y. Ning, et al., Dissecting the genetic basis of resistance

Fig. 1

The three main steps in the emergence of an arbovirus.