Double-Ovsynch, compared with presynch with or without GnRH, improves fertility in heat-stressed lactating dairy cows

Double-Ovsynch, compared with presynch with or without GnRH, improves fertility in heat-stressed lactating dairy cows

Accepted Manuscript Double-Ovsynch, compared to Presynch with or without GnRH, improves fertility in heat-stressed lactating dairy cows E. Dirandeh, A...

306KB Sizes 0 Downloads 32 Views

Accepted Manuscript Double-Ovsynch, compared to Presynch with or without GnRH, improves fertility in heat-stressed lactating dairy cows E. Dirandeh, A. Rezaei Roodbari, M.G. Colazo PII:

S0093-691X(14)00554-8

DOI:

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.011

Reference:

THE 12953

To appear in:

Theriogenology

Received Date: 5 August 2014 Revised Date:

5 October 2014

Accepted Date: 6 October 2014

Please cite this article as: Dirandeh E, Roodbari AR, Colazo MG, Double-Ovsynch, compared to Presynch with or without GnRH, improves fertility in heat-stressed lactating dairy cows, Theriogenology (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.011. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Revised 1

Double-Ovsynch, compared to Presynch with or without GnRH, improves fertility in

2

heat-stressed lactating dairy cows

3

E. Dirandeha*, A. Rezaei Roodbarib, and M.G. Colazoc

RI PT

4 5 a

Department of Animal Science, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University,

SC

6

P.O. Box 578, Sari, Mazandaran, Iran

7

9

b

Department of Animal Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111, Karaj, Alborz, Iran c

M AN U

8

Livestock Research Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Edmonton, AB, T6H 5T6, Canada

10

13

EP

12

TE D

11

*Corresponding author: Tel: +98-1133822741; Fax: +98-1133822565

15

E-mail: [email protected] (Essa Dirandeh)

16

17

AC C

14

18

19 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

20

Abstract The objective was to compare three timed-AI (TAI) protocols in lactating dairy cows

22

during heat stress. Multiparous Holstein cows yielding (mean ± SEM) 29.4 ± 0.3 kg of milk/d

23

were randomly assigned to one of three TAI protocols at 34 ± 5.1 d in milk: 1) Double-Ovsynch

24

(DO; n=486), the cows received GnRH-7d-PGF2α-3d-GnRH and Ovsynch56 (GnRH-7d-

25

PGF2α-56h-GnRH-16h-AI) was initiated 7 d later; 2) Presynch-GnRH-Ovsynch (PGO; n = 453),

26

the cows received PGF2α-14d-PGF2α-2d-GnRH and Ovsynch56 was initiated 7 d later; and 3)

27

Presynch-Ovsynch (PO; n = 435) the cows received PGF2α-14d-PGF2α and Ovsynch56 was

28

initiated 12 d later. The ovulatory response to the first GnRH of Ovsynch56 was higher in DO

29

(65.0%) compared to PGO (53.2%) and PO (45.5%). Luteolytic response to PGF2α of Ovsynch

30

was similar among TAI protocols (90.1, 87.1, and 86.2% for DO, PGO and PO, respectively).

31

Synchronization rate was greater in DO (86.2%) than in PGO (78.1%) and PO (72.1%)

32

protocols. Irrespective of the TAI protocol, cows that ovulated in response to first GnRH had

33

greater response to PGF2α (92.7 vs 77.1%). Mean (± SEM) diameter (mm) of ovulatory follicle

34

at TAI was larger in DO (16.1 ± 0.3) than PGO (15.6 ± 0.21) and PO (15.2 ± 0.12). Cows

35

subjected to DO had greater P/AI at 32 d and at 60 d after TAI (26.6 and 24.4%) compared to

36

those in PGO (21.4 and 20.0%) and PO (17.2 and 15.9%). However, TAI protocol had no

37

significant effect on the incidence of pregnancy loss (6.1, 6.6, and 7.4% for DO, GO and PO,

38

respectively). In summary, cows in the DO protocol had a greater ovulation rate to the first

39

GnRH and a higher synchronization rate, larger ovulatory follicles and greater P/AI. Of the three

40

protocols used, DO yield the best reproductive performance in heat-stressed, lactating dairy

41

cows.

42

Keywords: Double-Ovsynch; Presynch-Ovsynch; Timed-AI protocols; Dairy cows; Heat stress

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

21

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

43

1.

Introduction

45

There are several GnRH-based protocols that increase insemination risk for dairy cattle, as they

46

facilitate timed-AI (TAI) without the necessity to detect estrus [1]. The Ovsynch protocol,

47

commonly used to synchronize ovulation for TAI in dairy cattle, consists of two GnRH

48

treatments given 9 d apart, with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) given 7 d after the first GnRH [2].

49

Over the past few years, the Ovsynch protocol has been modified to further improve pregnancy

50

per AI (P/AI). A presynchronization strategy that involves two injections of prostaglandin F2α

51

(PGF2α), each given 14 d apart, increased P/AI when Ovsynch was initiated 11 [3] or 12 d [4,5]

52

after the last PGF2α of the Presynch protocol (PO). However, acyclic cows are unlikely to

53

benefit from presynchronization with PGF2α as they do not have a CL. Hence, alternate

54

presynchronization protocols that integrate GnRH into the Presynch have been proposed to

55

optimize follicular development in acyclic cows [6]. A presynchronization protocol that

56

combines a single GnRH treatment with PGF2α (PGO) decreased the percentage of acyclic cows

57

over the Presynch protocol [3]. Most recently, a new presynchronization protocol that included

58

PGF2α and GnRH (Double Ovsynch; DO) improved P/AI compared to the Presynch-Ovsynch

59

(PO) protocol in primiparous cows (65.2 versus 45.2%) [7]. In addition, Ayres et al. [8] reported

60

that DO compared to PO increased the percentage of cows with a CL at initial GnRH and

61

improved most aspects of synchronization during an Ovsynch protocol.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

44

62

It is well known that lactating dairy cows inseminated during heat stress have impaired

63

ovarian follicular dynamics and decreased fertility [9,10]. These negative effects on follicular

64

steroidogenesis and oocyte quality were still manifest during early autumn [11,12] with fertility

65

not restored until early winter [13] when temperatures had moderated. Recently, Akbarabadi et

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

al. [14] reported that service per conception tended to increase during a warm season (1.95 ±

67

0.14) compared to a cold season (1.62 ± 0.17) in dairy cows subjected to a PO protocol.

68

Therefore, there is a need to identify new approaches to improve fertility in lactating dairy cows

69

exposed to heat stress. One of those approaches could be elimination of compromised follicles

70

with hormonal treatments that induce ovulation, synchronize emergence of a new follicular

71

wave, and allow TAI [12,15].

RI PT

66

We hypothesized that cows with their estrous cycle presynchronized with GnRH and

73

PGF2α (DO and PGO) have greater cyclicity and P/AI than cows with their estrous cycle

74

presynchronized with only PGF2α (PO). The objectives of this study were to compare ovarian

75

response, P/AI and pregnancy loss of multiparous Holstein cows subjected to three TAI

76

protocols (DO, PGO or PO) during heat stress.

77

2.

79

2.1.

80

Materials and methods

TE D

78

M AN U

SC

72

Animals and management

This experiment was conducted at a commercial dairy farm between July and Nov 2013

82

(Temperature Humidity Index [THI] = 78-84). A total of 1,374 multiparous lactating Holstein

83

cows (yielding 29.4 ± 0.3 kg of milk/d) were enrolled. Cows were housed in free-stall barns with

84

fans and bedded with sand. Cows received a TMR formulated for lactating dairy cows producing

85

40 kg of 3.5% fat milk according to NRC [16] guidelines and had free access to water. Diets

86

were fed twice daily (07:00 and 16:00) for ad libitum intake (10% of refusals on as fed basis).

87

Main ingredients were silage (corn and alfalfa), grain (barley or corn), hay (alfalfa or grass), and

88

mineral supplements. All cows participating in this experiment were milked thrice daily at

AC C

EP

81

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

89

approximately 8-h intervals, and monitored daily for signs of diseases. If any health issues

90

occurred, animals were moved to hospital pens and appropriate treatments were performed

91

(following standard treatment protocols) until total recovery.

93

RI PT

92

2.2. TAI protocols

94

Weekly, a cohort of cows at 34 ± 5.1 d in milk (DIM) was randomly assigned to receive

96

one of three TAI protocols: Double-Ovsynch (DO; n = 486), Presynch-GnRH-Ovsynch (PGO; n

97

= 453) or Presynch-Ovsynch (PO; n = 435). The DO cows received GnRH (100 µg gonadorelin

98

acetate, im; Parnell Technologies PTY. LTD., Alexandria, Australia) followed by PGF2α (500

99

µg cloprostenol, im; Parnell Technologies) 7 d later and GnRH 3 d after PGF2α, then began the

100

Ovsynch protocol 7 d later. The PGO cows received two injections of PGF2α 14 d apart,

101

followed by GnRH 2 d after last PGF2α, then began the Ovsynch 12 d later. The PO cows

102

received two injections of PGF2α 14 d apart, and then began the Ovsynch protocol 12 d later. All

103

cows received the same Ovsynch protocol (so called Ovsynch56) [17] that consists of GnRH

104

followed by PGF2α 7 d later and a second GnRH treatment administered 56 h after PGF2α.

105

Cows were timed-inseminated 16 h after second GnRH treatment. Estrus detection was

106

performed by visual observation (three times daily for at least 30 min each) from PGF2α to the

107

second GnRH treatment of Ovsynch56. The following symptoms were used to characterize

108

estrus: vaginal mucous discharge, bellowing, increased nervousness and activity, walking the

109

fence line, swelling and reddening of the vulva, mounting other cows, or observed in standing

110

estrus. Cows that showed signs of estrus were inseminated approximately 12 h after onset of

111

estrus and were considered to have an early AI.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

95

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Two professional AI technicians performed all inseminations, with semen from three

113

commercially available sires equally balanced among the three experimental groups. Treatment

114

protocols and activities during this study are shown (Fig. 1).

RI PT

112

115 116

2.3. Ultrasonographic examinations

117

Ovarian examinations were performed by transrectal ultrasonography (BCF equipped with

119

a 6-8 MHz linear transducer; Ultrasound Australas, Victoria, Australia) during the Ovsynch56 (at

120

first GnRH injection, at PGF2α injection, at TAI, and 7 d after TAI) in all cows.

M AN U

SC

118

Cycling status and proportion of cows ovulating to initial GnRH treatment were determined

122

as previously described [18]. Ultrasonography at TAI was used to determine diameter of the

123

ovulatory follicle and along with ultrasonography 7 d after TAI were used to determine ovulation

124

to second GnRH. Ovulation was confirmed by the presence of a CL 7 d after TAI in the same

125

ovary, which had the largest follicle at TAI.

TE D

121

Cows with early ovulation included those with no dominant follicle ≥10 mm at TAI and

127

those that were inseminated before TAI. Response to PGF2α was considered attained when the

128

functional CL regressed. Synchronization rate was defined as the number of cows responding to

129

PGF2α and ovulating after second GnRH over the total number of cows [19].

AC C

EP

126

130

Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasonography at 32 d after AI. Pregnancy was

131

characterized by the presence of fluid, an embryo, and a heartbeat. Cows diagnosed pregnant at

132

32 d were re-examined at 60 ± 5 d after AI to confirm pregnancy. Pregnancy loss was considered

133

to have occurred when a cow was diagnosed pregnant at 32 d after TAI and not pregnant at 60 d.

134

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

135

2.4. Statistical analyses

136

All data were analyzed using SAS (version 9.1 for Windows; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

138

Binomial data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) of the GENMOD

139

procedure, as described [20]. For analysis of pregnancy status at 32 and 60 d after TAI, the

140

model included the effects of TAI protocol, response to first GnRH of Ovsynch56 and their

141

interactions in all cows. For analysis of ovarian responses to Ovsynch56, the model considered

142

TAI protocol, parity, and their interactions. Variables and interactions remaining in the final

143

multivariable model at P < 0.05, based on the robust empirical standard errors produced by the

144

GEE analysis, were considered significant. The main-effects model was assessed for first-order

145

interactions, where treatments remained in the model. Probability values 0.05 were considered

146

significant, whereas those between 0.051 and 0.10 were considered trends.Diameter of the

147

ovulatory follicle was analyzed using PROC MIXED. Differences between means were tested by

148

the PDIFF option and adjusted using the Tukey procedure. Probability values ≤ 0.05 were

149

considered significant, whereas those from 0.051 to 0.1 were considered trends.

150

152

3. Results

AC C

151

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

137

153

Ovarian response data are presented in Table 1. More (P = 0.04) cows in the DO protocol

154

had a CL at first GnRH of Ovsynch56 compared to those in PGO or PO. However, there were no

155

differences among TAI protocols in the percentage of cows having a CL at the PGF2α treatment

156

of the Ovsynch56. The proportion of cows that responded to the first GnRH injection of the

157

Ovsynch56 was greater (P = 0.01) for DO than PGO and PO protocol, and it was greater for

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PGO than PO (P = 0.04). Regardless of TAI protocol, cows that ovulated in response to first

159

GnRH had greater response to PGF2α (92.7 vs 77.1%). However, the percentage of cows with

160

luteal regression after PGF2α and early ovulations did not differ among TAI protocols.

161

Ovulatory response to second GnRH injection of Ovsynch56 was greater (P = 0.02) in the DO

162

protocol compared to PGO and PO (Table 1).

RI PT

158

The proportion of cows that showed signs of estrus and were inseminated before TAI

164

(Early AI) did not differ between PGO (19/453, 4.1%) and PO (15/435, 3.4%) but it was greater

165

(P = 0.04) in DO (34/486, 7.0%). Mean (± SEM) diameter (mm) of ovulatory follicle at the time

166

of TAI was larger (P = 0.04) in DO (16.1 ± 0.3) than PGO (15.6 ± 0.21) and PO (15.2 ± 0.12)

167

groups, but did not differ (P = 0.38) between PGO and PO (Table 1).

M AN U

SC

163

Timed-AI protocol affected the percentage of cows diagnosed pregnant at 32 and 60 d after

169

AI (Table 2). A greater (P = 0.02) percentage of DO cows were pregnant at 32 d after AI

170

compared to PGO and PO cows. The proportion of pregnant cows was also greater (P = 0.03) for

171

PGO than PO at 32 d after AI. At second pregnancy exam (60 ± 5 d after AI), P/AI was greater

172

(P = 0.03) for DO than for PGO and PO protocols. Proportion of pregnant cows was also greater

173

(P = 0.04) for PGO than PO at second pregnancy exam. However, the risk of pregnancy loss

174

between 32 and 60 d after AI did not differ among TAI protocols.

EP

TE D

168

When only synchronized cows (n = 1092) were considered, a greater P/AI at 32 and 60 d

176

after AI was still observed in DO cows compared to PGO and PO cows. Among cows that

177

responded to first GnRH injection of Ovsynch56, P/AI at 32 d after AI was greatest in DO group

178

compared to PGO and PO groups (P = 0.03, Fig 2).

AC C

175

179 180

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

181

4.

Discussion

182

The use of exogenous hormones to synchronize emergence of a new follicular wave and

184

allow TAI has been proposed as one approach to reduce heat stress infertility [12]. The current

185

study compared ovarian response, P/AI and pregnancy loss of multiparous Holstein cows

186

subjected to three TAI protocols during heat stress. Pregnancy per AI diagnosed at 32 and 60 d

187

after AI was greater in cows subjected to DO than in cows subjected to PGO or PO protocols,

188

but pregnancy loss did not differ among TAI protocols. Similarly, Souza et al. [7] compared DO

189

versus PO at first TAI and reported that DO resulted in a higher P/AI in primiparous (65.2 vs

190

45.2%, P < 0.05) but not multiparous (37.5 vs 39.3%) cows. Astiz and Fargas, [21] also reported

191

higher P/AI in primiparous cows subjected to DO than that in those subjected to G6G (i.e.

192

PGF2α-2d-GnRH and the Ovsynch56 is initiated 6 d later). The success of ovulation

193

synchronization protocols has been related to ovulatory response to first GnRH injection of

194

Ovsynch [22-24] and progesterone concentrations prior to PGF2α injection of Ovsynch [25-28].

195

The greatest P/AI at 32 d occurred in DO cows that ovulated to first GnRH injection of Ovsynch.

196

Therefore, the overall greater P/AI obtained in cows in the DO protocol may be attributed to a

197

better ovarian response to treatments. In fact, a greater proportion of cows in the DO group

198

ovulated following first GnRH of Ovysnch56. In addition, more cows in this group responded to

199

PGF2α treatment and ovulated after second GnRH.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

200

RI PT

183

The impetus for incorporating an injection of GnRH to the PO protocol used in this study

201

was to induce ovulation, synchronize a new follicular wave and induce cyclicity in anovular

202

cows. Hence, cows that ovulated to this injection of GnRH would have had a large dominant

203

follicle more likely to respond to first GnRH of Ovsynch56. Indeed, addition of a GnRH

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

injection before first GnRH of Heatsynch (a modification of the 7-d Ovsynch protocol in which

205

the second GnRH treatment is replaced by estradiol) in cows presynchronized with PGF2α

206

decreased the percentage of anovular cows, but did not significantly increase P/AI [3]. In the

207

present study, cows subjected to the PGO protocol had improved ovarian response and better

208

P/AI than those subjected to PO. Although, we expected that incorporation of GnRH into a PO

209

protocol would improve P/AI in Holstein cows during heat stress, this improvement was below

210

that attained in the DO protocol.

SC

RI PT

204

In a previous study, pregnancy outcome to Ovsynch was highly associated with the

212

ovulatory response to initial GnRH treatment [23]. Similarly, Chebel et al. [24] reported that

213

P/AI was 10.0% greater in cows responding to first GnRH compared to those that did not

214

respond. A lack of follicle turnover due to failure to respond to the initial GnRH administration

215

might compromise the quality of embryos and consequently reduce P/AI. Cerri et al. [29]

216

demonstrated that embryo quality but not fertilization rate was compromised when follicle

217

turnover occurred in a very low percentage of cow subjected to a TAI protocol. Embryos from

218

those cows had fewer blastomeres and a lower proportion of live blastomeres [29]. In the present

219

study, the difference in P/AI by ovulatory response to first GnRH depended on the TAI protocol.

220

In this regard, the difference in P/AI between cows that ovulated versus those that did not

221

ovulate was similar to that reported by Chebel et al. [24] and was significantly different in cows

222

subjected to DO, but smaller and not significant in cows subjected to PGO or PO.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

211

223

Cows with greater plasma progesterone concentrations at first GnRH injection of Ovsynch56

224

were more fertile [24,30], which was associated with decreased LH pulsatility and improved

225

oocyte competence [31]. Conversely, lower progesterone concentrations at intitiation of Ovsynch

226

in presynchronized cows resulted in lower P/AI after first postpartum AI [32]. Although

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

progesterone concentrations were not determined in this study, we speculated that more cows in

228

DO had elevated circulating progesterone concentrations during Ovsynch, as more cows in this

229

group had a CL at initiation of TAI protocol and ovulated following first GnRH. It is well known

230

that anovular cows at the first postpartum AI have reduced P/AI [33] and increased late

231

embryonic mortality [28]. In that regard, Herlihy et al. [26] reported that a DO protocol was

232

effective at inducing cyclicity in most anovular cows and improved P/AI at the first postpartum

233

service compared to PO (46.3 vs 38.2%). In our study, the incidence of cows without a CL at

234

first GnRH of Ovsynch was 11.5, 19.9 and 23.0% for DO, PGO and PO respectively consistent

235

with the suggestion that DO is effective in inducing cyclicity in anovular cows. Although the

236

majority of anovular cows ovulate after initial GnRH of Ovsynch and form a CL [17,34], low

237

progesterone concentrations during development of the ovulatory follicle appear to contribute to

238

reduced fertility in anovular cows [32]. This might be exacerbated in heat-stressed cows as some

239

of the reproductive losses during summer are associated with decreased expression of estrus and

240

reduced luteal progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle [35-37]. Fan cooling of lactating

241

dairy cows during summer increased estrous response rates and area under the luteal phase curve

242

was significantly higher than for controls [35]. In lactating, cyclic Holstein cows the

243

concentration of circulating progesterone during the estrous cycle was lower during summer

244

compared to spring or winter [36,37]. Therefore, in addition to better synchronization, it seems

245

likely that the DO protocol increased circulating progesterone concentrations prior to

246

administration of PGF2α and subsequently improved P/AI. Indeed, Ayres et al. [14] reported

247

that presynchronization with DO compared to PO increased the percentage of cows with high

248

(>3.0 ng/mL) circulating P4 at PGF2α of Ovsynch (88.0 vs 76.3%).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

227

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

In synchronized cows, P/AI was also greater in DO cows; hence, another potential reason

250

for the improved P/AI in this group was ovulation of larger follicles compared to those in cows

251

in the PGO and PO groups. Premature ovulation of a dominant follicle with GnRH reduced

252

ovulatory follicle size and decreased fertility in both beef [38,39] and dairy cattle [23,40].

253

Wiltbank et al. [41] suggested that lower fertility in cows with a small ovulatory follicle was

254

associated with reduced serum estradiol concentrations before AI and ovulation of a less mature

255

oocyte. Reducing the size of the ovulatory follicle also reduced subsequent CL volume and

256

serum P4 concentrations [40]. Plasma estradiol concentration is already reduced during heat

257

stress; combined with ovulation of small follicle, this would be expected to further compromise

258

oocyte quality and postovulatory CL function.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

249

In conclusion, results from this study supported use of a DO protocol to increase P/AI in

260

lactating dairy cows during heat stress. Cows subjected to the DO protocol had a greater

261

ovulation rate to first GnRH of Ovsynch, improved overall synchronization rate, ovulated larger

262

follicles and had greater P/AI. Although P/AI was below what would normally be attained during

263

a cold season, DO can be recommended as a reproductive management tool to maximize fertility

264

in lactating dairy cows during heat stress.

267

EP

266

Acknowledgments

AC C

265

TE D

259

268

The authors thank Dr. John Kastelic (University of Calgary) for critical review of the

269

manuscript. Our gratitude is also extended to the owners and personnel of Mahdasht Meat &

270

Milk Company (Northern Iran) for allowing us access to their cows and facilities to conduct this

271

research and for covering the cost of hormonal treatments.

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

272

References [1] Colazo MG and Mapletoft RJ. A review of current timed-AI (TAI) programs for beef and dairy

274

cattle. Can Vet J 2014;55:772–80.

275

[2] Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α

276

and GnRH. Theriogenology 1995;44:915–23.

277

[3] Galvão KN, Santos JE, Cerri RL, Chebel RC, Rutigliano HM, Bruno RG, Bicalho RC.

278

Evaluation of methods of resynchronization for insemination in cows of unknown pregnancy

279

status. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:4240–52.

280

[4] Moreira F, Orlandi C, Risco CA, Mattos R, Lopes F, Thatcher WW. Effects of

281

presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to timed artificial insemination

282

protocol in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001;84:1646–59.

283

[5] El-Zarkouny SZ, Cartmill JA, Hensley BA, Stevenson JS. Presynchronization of estrous cycles

284

before Ovsynch and progesterone in dairy cows: Ovulation, pregnancy rates, and embryo survival.

285

J Dairy Sci 2004;87:1024–37.

286

[6] Gümen A, Souza AH, Cunha AP, Silva EBPC, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC. Effect of GnRH

287

between presynch injections and estradiol-17β during the Ovsynch protocol on conception rates in

288

lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2005;83:171.

289

[7] Souza AH, AyresH, Ferreira RM, Wiltbank MC. A new presynchronization system (Double-

290

Ovsynch) increases fertilityat first postpartum timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology

291

2008;70:208–15.

292

[8] Afsari Akbarabadi M, Karami Shabankareh H, Abdolmohammadi A, Shahsavari MH. Effect

293

of PGF2a and GnRH on the reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows subjected to

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

273

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination during the warm or cold periods of

295

the year. Theriogenology 2014;82:509–16.

296

[9] De Rensis F, Scaramuzzi RJ. Heat stress and seasonal effects on reproduction in the dairy

297

cow-a review. Theriogenology 2003;60:1139–51.

298

[10] Dirandeh E. Starting Ovsynch protocol on day 6 of first postpartum estrous cycle increased

299

fertility in dairy cows by affecting ovarian response during heat stress. Anim Reprod Sci 2014;

300

149:135-140.

301

[11] Roth Z, Meweidan R, Shaham-Albalancy A, Braw-Tal R, Wolfenson D. Delayed effect of

302

heat stress on steroid production in medium-size and preovulatory bovine follicles. Reproduction

303

2001;121:745–51.

304

[12] Roth Z, Arav A, Bor A, Zeron Z, Braw-Tal R, Wolfenson D. Improvement of quality of

305

oocytes collected in the autumn by enhanced removal of impaired follicles from preovulatory

306

heat-stressed cows. Reproduction 2001;122:737–44.

307

[13] Badinga L, Collier RJ, Thatcher WW, Wilcox CJ. Effects of climatic and management

308

factors on conception rate of dairy cattle in subtropical environmental. J Dairy Sci 1985;68:78–85.

309

[14] Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Cunha AP, Araújo RR, Wiltbank MC. Double-Ovsynch in high-

310

producing dairy cows: Effects on progesterone concentrations and ovulation to GnRH treatments.

311

Theriogenology 2013;79:159–64.

312

[15] Dirandeh E, Kohram H, Zare Shahneh A. GnRH injection before artificial insemination (AI)

313

alters follicle dynamics in Iranian Holstein cows. African J Biotech 2009;8:3672–6.

314

[16] NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. Seventh edition. Washington, DC: National

315

Academy of Science; 2001.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

294

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[17] Brusveen DJ, Cunha AP., Silva CD, Cunha PM, Sterry RA, Silva EP, Guenther JN, Wiltbank

317

MC. Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial

318

insemination (AI) during Ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci

319

2008;91:1044–52.

320

[18] Colazo MG, Gordon MB, Rajamahendran R, Mapletoft RJ, Ambrose DJ. Pregnancy rates to

321

timed-AI in dairy cows treated with gonadotropin releasing hormone or porcine luteinizing

322

hormone. Theriogenology 2009;72:262–70.

323

[19] Yilmazbas-Mecitoglu G, Karakaya E, Keskin A, Alkan A, Gumen A. Reducing the duration

324

between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and prostaglandin F2α treatment in the

325

Ovsynch protocol to 6 days improved ovulation to second GnRH treatment, but inclined to reduce

326

fertility. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:3817–24.

327

[20] Colazo MG, Ponce-Barajas P, Ambrose DJ. Pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating

328

dairy cows subjected to 2 different intervals from presynchronization to initiation of Ovsynch

329

protocol. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:7640–8.

330

[21] Astiz S, Fargas O. Pregnancy per AI differences between primiparous and multiparous high-

331

yield dairy cows after using Double Ovsynch or G6G synchronization protocols. Theriogenology

332

2013;79:1065–70.

333

[22] Vasconcelos JL, Silcox RW, Rosa GJ, Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization rate, size

334

of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on

335

different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology1999;52:1067–78.

336

[23] Bello NM, Steibel JP, Pursley JR. Optimizing ovulation to first GnRH improved outcomes to

337

each hormonal injection of Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:3413–24.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

316

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[24] Chebel RC, Santos JE, Cerri RL, Rutigliano HM, Bruno RG. Reproduction in dairy cows

339

following progesterone insert presynchronization and resynchronization protocols. J Dairy Sci

340

2006;89:4205–19.

341

[25] Martins JPN, Policelli RK, Neuder LM, Raphael W, Pursley JR. Effects of cloprostenol

342

sodium at final prostaglandin F2α of Ovsynch on complete luteolysis and pregnancy per artificial

343

insemination in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:2815–24.

344

[26] Herlihy MM, Giordano JO, Souza AH, Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Keskin A, Nascimento AB,

345

Guenther JN, Gaska JM, Kacuba SJ, Crowe MA, Butler ST, Wiltbank MC. Presynchronization

346

with Double-Ovsynch improves fertility at first postpartum artificial insemination in lactating

347

dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:7003–14.

348

[27] Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Guenther JN, Pawlisch R, Bas S, Cunha AP, Fricke PM.

349

Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with

350

Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:639–53.

351

[28] Colazo MG, Dourey A, Rajamahendran R, Ambrose DJ. Progesterone supplementation

352

before timed AI increased ovulation synchrony and pregnancy per AI, and supplementation after

353

timed AI reduced pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2013;79:833–41.

354

[29] Cerri RL, Rutigliano HM, Chebel RC, Santos JE. Period of dominance of the ovulatory

355

follicle influences embryo quality in lactating dairy cows. Reproduction 2009;137:813–23.

356

[30] Stevenson JS, Pulley SL.Characteristics and retention of luteal structures, extended

357

postinsemination cycle, progesterone, and pregnancy-specific protein B in serum after human

358

chorionic gonadotropin treatment of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:4396–409.

359

[31] Mihm M, Baguisi A, Poland MP, Roche JF. Association between the duration of dominance

360

of the ovulatory follicle and pregnancy rate in beef heifers. J Reprod Fertil 1994;102:123–30.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

338

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[32] Bisinotto RS, Chebel RC, Santos JEP. Follicular wave of the ovulatory follicle and not cyclic

362

status influences fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:3578–87.

363

[33] Santos JEP, Rutigliano HM, SáFilho MF. Risk factors for resumption of postpartum estrous

364

cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2009;110:207–21.

365

[34] Gümen A, Guenther JN, Wiltbank MC. Follicular size and response to Ovsynch versus

366

detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:3184-94.

367

[35] Younas M, Fuquay J W, Smith A E, Moore A B. Estrous and endocrine responses of lactating

368

Holsteins to forced ventilation during summer. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:430-36.

369

[36] Rosenberg M, Herz Z, Davidson M, Folman Y. Seasonal variations in post-partum plasma

370

progesterone levels and conception in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows. J Reprod Fertil

371

1977; 51:363-67.

372

[37] Howell JL , Fuquay JW, Smith AE. Corpus luteum growth and function in lactating Holstein

373

cows during spring and summer. J Dairy Sci 1994;77:735-39.

374

[38] Perry GA, Smith MF, Lucy MC, Green JA, Parks TE, MacNeil MD, Roberts AJ, Geary TW.

375

Relationship between follicular size at insemination and pregnancy success. Proc Natl Acad Sci

376

USA 2005;102:5268–73.

377

[39] Mussard ML, Burke CR, Behlke EJ, Gasser CL, Day ML. Influence of premature induction

378

of a luteinizing hormone surge with gonadotropin-releasing hormone on ovulation, luteal function,

379

and fertility in cattle. J Anim Sci 2007;85:937–43.

380

[40] Vasconcelos JLM, Sartori R, Oliveira HN, Guenther JG, Wiltbank MC. Reduction in size of

381

the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate. Theriogenology

382

2001;56:307–14.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

361

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[41] Wiltbank MC, Sartori R, Herlihy MM, Vasconcelos JLM, Nascimento AB, Souza AH, Ayres

384

H, Cunha AP, Keskin A, Guenther JN, Gumen A. Managing the dominant follicle in lactating

385

dairy cows. Theriogenology 2011;76:1568–82.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

383

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Number and percentage of lactating Holstein cows that had a CL at first GnRH and PGF2α, ovulated after first GnRH, ovulated before timed-AI (TAI), responded to PGF2α treatment, and ovulated after AI in the three TAI protocols. TAI protocols PGO

486

453

Cows with a CL at first GnRH of Ovsynch56, % (no.)

88.5a (430)

80.1b (363)

Cows with a CL at PGF2α of Ovsynch56, % (no.)

96.2 (468)

94.7 (429)

Cows that ovulated to first GnRH of Ovsynch56, % (no.)1

65.0a (316)

Cows that had luteal regression after PGF2α of Ovsynch56, % (no.)2 Cows with early ovulation, % (no.)3 Cows that ovulated after AI, % (no.)4

P-Value

435

0.04

92.6 (403)

0.60

53.2b (241)

45.5c (198)

0.01

93.5 (438)

87.1 (395)

86.2 (375)

0.71

8.2 (40) 87.2a (424)

7.7 (35) 78.1b (354)

7.6 (33) 72.1c (314)

0.83

SC

77.0b (335)

M AN U

Total no. cows

PO

RI PT

DO

0.02

AC C

EP

TE D

TAI protocols: DO = Double-Ovsynch; PGO = Presynch-GnRH-Ovsynch; PO = Presynch-Ovsynch 1 Ovulation was determined retrospectively by recording the location, number, and size of follicles and CL at first GnRH, and comparing those data to ovarian structures on the day of PGF2α of Ovsynch56. 2 Response to PGF2α was considered attained when the CL diameter decreased from PGF2α treatment to a diameter of 10 mm or less at TAI. 3 Cows with early ovulation included those with no dominant follicle ≥ 10 mm at TAI and those that were inseminated before TAI 4 Ovulation was confirmed by the presence of a CL 7 d after TAI in the same ovary, which had the largest follicle at TAI

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Effect of timed-AI (TAI) protocols on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) and pregnancy loss in all (n=1374) and synchronized (n=1092) lactating Holstein cows.

TAI protocols

486

453

P/AI at 32 d after AI, % (no.)

23.2 (113) a

16.7 (76) b

[% (no. / total no.)] P/AI at 60 d after AI, % (no.)

21.6 (105) a

15.6 (71) b

[% (no. / total Pregnancy lossno.)] between 32 and 60 d after AI, % (no. not pregnant at 60 d/ no. pregnant at 32 d)

6.1 (8/113)

6.6 (5/76)

No. synchronized cows1

424

M AN U

Total no, cows

PO

P-Value

RI PT

PGO

435

12.4 (54) c

0.02

11.4 (50) c

0.03

SC

DO

7.4 (4/54)

354

314

0.67

P/AI at 32 d after AI, % (no.)

26.6 (113) a

21.4 (76) b

17.2 (54) c

0.03

[% (no. / total no.)] P/AI at 60 d after AI, % (no.)

24.4 (105) a

20.0 (71) b

15.9 (50) c

0.04

TAI(no. protocols: = Double-Ovsynch; PGO = Presynch-GnRH-Ovsynch; PO = Presynch-Ovsynch [% / totalDO no.)]

EP

TE D

A cow was considered synchronized if she responded to PGF2α and ovulated after second GnRH of Ovsynch56

AC C

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

3d

7d

DO GnRH

PGF2α

PGF2α 14 d

2d

PGF2α 7d U/S

GnRH

PGF2α 7d

U/S

14 d

12 d

PO

PGF2α

U/S

TAI

16 h

56 h

7d

U/S

U/S

GnRH

U/S

GnRH

PGF2α

PGF2α

7d

U/S

M AN U

PGO

TAI

16 h

56 h

U/S

7d

GnRH

RI PT

7d

GnRH

SC

GnRH

PGF2α

GnRH

7d

U/S

U/S

GnRH 16 h

56 h

TAI 7d

U/S

AC C

EP

TE D

Fig. 1. Diagram of activities and treatments during the study. Lactating Holstein cows (n=1374) were randomly assigned to one of three timed-AI protocols; Double-Ovsynch (DO), PresynchGnRH-Ovsynch (PGO) or Presynch-Ovsynch (PO). Mean ± SEM days in milk at initiation of the protocol were 38 ± 3, 32 ± 2, and 29 ± 2 d for DO, PGO, and PO, respectively. Transrectal ultrasonography (U/S) was performed during the Ovsynch56 to determine ovarian response to treatments.

U/S

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

35

RI PT

40 33.7 a

24.2 ab 21.8 ab

20

18.2 b

18.1 b 16.2 b

M AN U

P/AI (%)

25

SC

30

15 10

0

EP

DO

TE D

5

PGO

PO

AC C

Fig. 2. Effect of timed-AI (TAI) protocol and ovulatory response to first GnRH of Ovsynch56 on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 32 d in synchronized cows (n=1092). A cow was considered synchronized if she responded to PGF2α and ovulated after second GnRH of Ovsynch56. Open bars represent cows that ovulated after first GnRH of Ovsynch56; solid bars represent cows that failed to ovulate after first GnRH of Ovsynch56. TAI protocols: DO = Double-Ovsynch; PGO = Presynch-GnRH-Ovsynch; PO = Presynch-Ovsynch. a,b Bars with different superscript letters differ (P=0.03).