t
809—813.
Solid State Communications, Vol.31,in pp. Pergamon Press Ltd. 1979. Printed Great Britain.
Dynamics of Hot Carrier Cooling in Photo—Excited GaAs by R. F. L.eheny, Jagdeep Shah, R. 1... Fork, C. V. Shank and A. Migus* Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Holadel, N.J. (Received 30 Nay 1979 by A. G. ~Chynoweth) Carrier relaxation following pulses,
excitation
with subpicosecond optical
determined from time resolved nearband gap transmission spec-
trum changes, is described for GaAs. For n < 5x1017cm3 the observed relaxation can be related to carrier—phonon interaction, but at higher densities the rate of relaxation is significantly slowed, possibly due to carrier screening.
For semiconductors where
carriers
are
gen—
the hot carriers to cool to the
lattice
tempera—
erated with photons having energy in excess of the band gap energy, relaxation of the carriers to the
ture since the rate of energy exchange with the lattice decreases rapidly at low carrier tempera-
band edge occurs as a result of carrier—carrier and carrier—lattice interactions.~~1) We have investigated the dynamics of these relaxation
tures.~3~Consistent with our previous results(2) we find for moderate excitation densities, n < 5 x 1O~ cm3, the initial cooling is due to
processes pulses.
LO phonon emission by the hot carriers; however, this polar optic scattering mechanism becomes less
in GaAs with subpicosecond optical Our previously reported investiga—
tions~2~, with the
sample maintained
at
80°K,
effective as carriers
cool.
Below
T
demonstrated that for the range of excitation 3 and den— for aities energy investigated excess of ~ (1016_1018 : 120 meV, cm carrier—carrier interactions scatter the carriers out of their
0 :50K the contribution of acoustic phonon scattering, has a weaker temperature dependence, becomes which reia— tively more significant. In addition, we find the initial cooling rate slows down for higher carrier
initial
densities,
states
in
less
than a picosecond.
For
this case a thermal distribution of carriers, with an effective carrier temperature T greater than the lattice equilibrium
temperature T
within
0, evolved following excitation and
one
picosecond
and
for n > ~O18,the carriers can no
longer be described by a thermal distribution for times as long as 10 picoseconds after excitation. These measurements provide the first direct cvi— dence for a change in the hot carrier energy loss
then cooled to the lattice temperature in ~ poec as a result of LO phonon emission by the hot carriers.
mechanism at high carrier densities.
papercooling we describe additional ments Inofthis carrier for the case of measure— the sample maintained at ~10°K. Lowering the sample tem-
The measurements were made1.5~thick on a sample of supported molecular beam grown GaAs and maintained with between layers of AlGaAs T 0 1O°K. The sample transmission was measured
perature
by
*
greatly
increases the time required for
probe
On leave from Laboratoire D’Optique Appliquee Ecole Polytechnique—ENSTA, Palaiseau, France with a grant from the European Space Agency. 809
pulses
using
the
filtered
810
DYNANICS OF HOT CARRIER COOLING IN PHOTO—EXCITED GaAs
Vol. 31, No. 11
0
(8000 < < 8200A) output of a broadband, subpi— cosecond continuum source excited by the output of an amplified 0.5 paso, ~
=
excitation was accomplished
6150A° laser. (U’‘ using
a
pump
Sample pulse 0
generated by stimulated Raman emission Q~:75OOA) from ethanol excited by the same amplified laser pulse. The relative time of arrival at the sample
1.0
GaAs 10. 10K
~ ~ 0.5 —
4
~
7900
of pump and probe pulse was adjusted by a variable
8100
8300
optical time delay. The probe and pump pulses were overlapped at the sample in a spot 1OO~i in
_______________________________________
dispersed by The diameter. a 1/U—meter transmitted spectrometer probe andbeam detected was with an optical multichannel. analyzer. sion spectrum for t < 0 where time is measured
~+1pwc 7900
810
~
Figure 1(a) shows the unperturbed sample tranamis— from the time the pump pulse arrives at the sample. Sensitivity to small changes in the transmission spectra is enhanced by electronically
_______________________________ 7900 8100 8300 0) 14
with takingthethe pump difference beam present between and spectra absent recorded as
illustrated
by
the
difference
spectra shown in
Figure 1(b). Screening of the free exciton and absorption induced by the shift of the band edge
~
r’+62p
14 14
~2: ~
7900
to lower energy as a result of the photo excited 5~is clearly evident in the trace for carriers~ t=1 psec, while at photon energies greater than the exciton energy there is a broad region of increased transmission.~2> With increasing time delay (Fig. lb) the transmission at these energies continues to evolve with the transmission increas— ing near the unperturbed band edge as the carriers
~
8100
r~+242ps.c —
7900
810 (b)
Fig. 1. (a)
Transmission spectrum of GaAs measured using the 0.5 psec continuum probe corrected for spectral variation of source and detector system.
(b)
high energy such as might occur if the carriers were to relax from their initial state solely by emission
without
8300
WAVELENGTH
relax into these states as a result of carrier— lattice interactions. At no time do we observe evidence for preferential occupation of states at
LO—phonon
~
Difference spectra for various time delays after excitation.
These
spectra are obtained by electronically
carrier—carrier
taking the difference between the
scattering. Rather the transmission spectrum corresponds at all times to a more uniform distri— bution characteristic of a thermal distribution of carriers. We estimate that the measured tranamis— sion spectrum at 1 psec iz approximately a thermal
spectra at time t and the spectra for t
distribution with carrier temperatura Tc > 150°K.
T a , according to c( d o (1—F e—F h ) where ~ 0 is the unperturbed absorption coefficient corresponding
We have also fitted the measured transmission spectra assuming the sample absorption coefficient
to band to band transitions and F e and Fh are the Fermi functions for electrons and holes resp.o—
~ varies with carrier density, n, and temperature,
tively.
The
details of this calculation, which
Vol. 31, No. 11
DYNAI4ICS OF HOT CARRIER COOLING IN PHOTO—EXCITED GaAs
takes account of band gap renormalization and which allows determination of both carrier density and temperature, have been discussed ousiy.’~~ Results of fitting three
150 fCc)
previ— spectra
measured at different excitation intensities, at a fixed time delay of 10 psec, are shown in Fig. 2. The temperature determined in this way, as a func—
81 I
‘ci
GaAs 10. 10K
‘~‘ ~1
14
~ 100
—
-
14
tion of time, is shown in Fig. 3. 14
I.. ‘S
1.5
(a)
I —~
50
‘S...
-
GaAs
-
‘S
T~.10K
10
~I
100
~ME (psec) I
I
I
7900
8100 WAVELENGTH
8300
ous time delays following pulsed excitation, the labeled points correspond to the
Fig. 2. Transmission spectra at 10 psec for three pump intensities 10, UI 0 and 15I~with IS 7 w/cm2. The dashed curves are 2x10 theoretical fits obtained as described in the text for (a) N=7x1016 ~ T 0=50K, 17cm3, Tc= 90K and Cc) N: (b) N=3x10 ixiOlScm3, T 0
=
Fig. 3. Measured hot carrier temperatures at van—
1UOK.
data of
Fig. 2.
The solid curve is car—
rier temperature an initial excess calculated energy ofassuming 120 meT. (Tc(0)
=
U65K) and the dashed curve mdi—
cates temperature expected if the the carrier —LO phononvariation scattering rate is decreased by a factor of 5.
12 cm3 For carrier densities thanan effective i0 carrier—carrier scattering greater provides mechanism for scattering the carriers out of their initial states to establish a Fermi distribution
energy range is so small that the processes involving acoustic phonocs (principally hole— acoustic phonon) become dominant.
with T 0 > I 0 . Carrier—lattice interactions, pro— vide the mechanism by which the thermalized carriers exchange energy with the lattice so as to
We have calculated the expected energy loss by the photo—excited carriers taking account of carrier—LO phonon and carrier—acoustic phonon
cool to the lattice temperature I. Considerable experimental and theoretical work has been done
scatter1ng~3~with the assumption that carrier— carrier scattering is sufficiently fast to main—
relating quasi—steady—state carrier temperatures to these processes.~6~The rate of energy loss by a hot carrier distribution in GaAs including polar
tam a nearly Fermi distribution of the carriers at all times. The calculated carrier temperature as a function of time, assuming an initial excess
optic (LO phonon), piezoelectric, and
energy of 120 meV, is shown by the solid
deformation
potential (acoustic phonon) scattering has been discussed by Ulbrich~~~ and by Gobel, et ~ Carriers with energy greater than Fii~are most effective for cooling via LO phonon emission, but for T~< 50°K the fraction of carriers in this
line
in
Fig. 3. This calculation yields a cooling rate that is independent of carrier density and is in good agreement with our results for n < 10~~ cal3. As predicted, carrier cooling is initially
rapid, achieving a temperature of
55°K
812
DYNA1IICS OF HOT CARRIER COOLING IN PHOTO—EXCITED GaAs
Vol. 31, No. 11
£n 10 psec, but subsequently slows down as the LO
where
phonon emission mechanism becomes less important.
He fi~nds a significant reduction in electron— phonon coupling when : u~,with the effects of
When the excitation
intensity is
increased
polar optic scattering limits the mobility.
screening increasing rapidly with decreasing
car—
beyond
n - io17 cm~we observe a slowing of the 17 we find carrier cooling. For n - 5 x10 (Fig. 2b) : 90°Kat 10 psec. When the excita—
rier temperature. In our measurements the onset of the decrease in carrier-phonon interaction appears to be more abrupt than these calculations
tion intensity is increased further the spectra at 10 psec (Fig. 2c) can no longer be fitted using
would predict and does not change with The dashed curve in Fig. 3 indicates the temperature
the assumed form for cC.
variation
A fit of the transmission
expected
for
the
case
where
the
data near the band edge yields a temperature I 1110°K, for this case, however the transmis— c sion at higher energy provides clear evidence for
electron — LO phonon scattering rate is reduced by a factor of five. In addition, while the decrease
a nonequilibrium distribution. It is significant to note that similar nonequilibrium distributions
screening of the electron—phonon interaction, this mechanism alone does not explain the nonthermal
of carriers at high excitation. densities have been (8) observed in photo—luminescence studies.
distribution evident in the data of Fig. 2c unless there is a similar reduction in effectiveness of carrier—carrier scattering. At present, no simple
These high
excitation
data
clearly
demon—
strate that the mechanism of carrier—phonon interaction responsible for rapid cooling of the carriers
at
lower
excitation
in
cooling
model
rate
appears
may
be attributed
to adequately
account
in part to
for these
observations.
intensity is less
In
conclusion,
we
have
investigated
the
effective at high carrier densities. This depar— tune occurs at a carrier density where the carrier
changes in transmission spectra of photo—excited GaAs using subpioosecond optical techniques to
plasmon energy (iia~r,) is approximately equal to ~ u,~. Raman scattering experimente’9~have demon— strated that at this density, the electron and phonon systems are strongly coupled with resultant screening of the polar optic modes. Screening may
show that in the excitation intensity range n 1016 — 1017 cal3 carriers relax into thermal distributions with I > T in a time < 1 psec and subsequently cool to the lattice temperature as a result of carrier—lattice interaction. At higher
effectively
energy
excitation densities this carrier lattice interac—
carriers and the lattice. calculated an increase in
tion cools the carriers less effectively, and for excitation densities > io18 cm the carriers can
reduce
exchange between the Ehrenreich~10~ has
the
efficiency
mobility as a result of screening
in
of
materials
no longer be described by a thermal distribution.
References [1] Jagdeep Shah, Solid State Electronics ji, U3 (1978). [2] C. V. Shank, H. L. Fork, R. F. Leheny and Rev. Letters .~iZ, 112 (1979).
Jagdeep
Shah,
Phys.
[3] E. 0. Goebel, 0. Hildebrand and K. M. Romanek, to be published in Proc. lUth International Conf. Phys. of Semiconductors, Edinburgh (1978). [U] E. P. Ippen and C. V. Shank in “Topics in Applied Physics” Vol. 18, ed. S. L. Shapiro, 83 (Springer—Verlag, New York, 1977). [5] Jagdeep Shah, R. F. Leheny, and W. 1577 (1977).
Wiegmam,
Phys.
Rev.
~
[6] See, for example, E. H. Conwell Solid—State Physics, Supplement 9 (Edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ebrenreich) Academic Press, New York (1967).
DYNANICS OF HOT CARRIER COOLING IN PHOTO—EXCITED GaAs
Vol. 31, No. 11
[7] R. G. Ulbrich, Phys. Rev. (8]
Jagdeep Shah, Phy. Rev.
[9] A. Mooradian and G. (1966).
B.
M
5719 (1973).
~J..Q3697
(197k).
Wright,
Phys.
[10] H. Ebrenreich, .1. Phys. Chem. Solids
~,
Rev.
Letters .i.~. 999
130 (1959).
813