Early Extubation After Cardiac Surgery Using Combined Intrathecal Sufentanil and Morphine Jeffrey D. Swenson, MD, R. Michael Hullander, MD, Kenneth Wingler, MD, and David Leivers, FRCA The records of 10 patients who had well-preserved respiratory and ventricular function and had received 50 pg of sufentanil and 0.5 mg of morphine intrathecally before induction of anesthesia for cardiopulmonary bypass surgery were reviewed. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and no patient received intravenous narcotics intraoperatively. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low, with 7 of 10 patients requiring no supplemental analgesic during the first 12 hours. Early extubation (within 8 hours of arrival in the intensive care unit) was possible in 8 patients; two patients remained intubated for reasons unrelated to the anesthetic
E
ARLY EXTUBATION has been advocated for patients undergoing cardiac surgery who have wellpreserved pulmonary and left ventricular function.1J Among the advantages cited by proponents of this view are reductions in respiratory complications, ventilatory support, and intensive care unit (ICU) requirements, as well as improved cardiac function and patient comfort. When early extubation is desired, techniques that have been used include combinations of inhalation agent with intravenous (IV) opioids3 or epidural local anesthetics.4 Current methods that include large doses of IV opioids result in sustained ventilatory depression due to prolonged systemic elimination.5p6Volatile anesthetics can facilitate early recovery but are associated with greater hemodynamic fluctuations7 and must be supplemented with other forms of analgesia early in the postoperative period. Epidural anesthesia produces sympathetic blockade and is associated with increased fluid requirements.4 Intrathecal (IT) opioids have been used widely, both intraoperatively as adjuvant anesthesia and postoperatively for analgesia.*-l3 Sufentanil, used intrathecally in doses as low as 10 pg, decreases volatile anesthetic requirements.14 Animal studies have shown that larger doses of IT opioids have progressively greater efficacy in diminishing the response to subsequent noxious stimuli.r5 The peak action of IT morphine occurs after 4 to 7 hour@ and therefore allows preoperative administration to produce maximal analgesia during the postoperative period. The intense intraoperative analgesia provided by IT sufentanil, along with the postoperative analgesia provided by IT morphine, make the combination a suitable choice for cardiac surgery. Varying amounts of IT sufentanil and morphine have been used as adjuvants to volatile anesthetics for cardiac surgery at this institution. A standardized technique has been used in patients for whom early extubation was planned. Patients having significant pulmonary disease, repeat sternotomies, ventricular dysfunction, or coagulation disorders were not considered candidates for this technique. The surgeons and ICU staff were educated to the potential offered by this technique for earlier recovery compared to commonly used IV opioid anesthetics. From manual intraoperative anesthesia records and computerized ICU archives, details of 10 consecutive patients who had received a standard dose of IT sufentanil and morphine for cardiac surgery without additional intraopera-
technique. No patient required naloxone, reintubation, or treatment for respiratory depression. Combined intrathecal sufentanil and morphine provided conditions that allowed successful early extubation in 8 of 10 of these selected cardiac surgery patients. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use. KEY WORDS: cardiac surgery, extubation, tanif, morphine, anesthetic technique.
intrathecal,
sufen-
tive opioids were obtained. The findings and results from this series of patients are reported. METHODS
After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval for retrospective examination, the records of 10 consecutive patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing cardiac surgery were reviewed. All patients had been considered suitable for early extubation and had received the standard perioperative management. Preoperative medications, including calcium channel blockers, B-blockers, and nitrates, were continued until the induction of anesthesia. Two hours prior to induction of anesthesia, each patient received morphine, 0.1 mg/kg, and scopolamine, 5 p,g/kg, intramuscularly, which provided sedation for the establishment of arterial and venous access. A lumbar puncture was performed in the lateral decubitus position using a 25-gauge Quincke-tipped needle and undiluted sufentanil, 0.005%, 1 mL (50 kg), and preservative-free morphine, 0.05%, 1 mL (0.5 mg) were injected into the intrathecal space. A central venous or pulmonary artery catheter was inserted immediately before induction of anesthesia. After preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced by titrating midazolam (up to 0.1 mg/kg IV) until loss of consciousness. The patient was then ventilated by mask, and vecuronium bromide, 0.15 mg/kg, was used to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Esmolol was administered as needed to diminish the hemodynamic response to intubation. No additional vasoactive agents or P-blockers were required between intubation and institution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Inhalation anesthesia was maintained with air, oxygen, and isoflurane. The end-tidal concentration of isoflurane was measured by mass spectrometry (PPG Biomedical Systems, Lenexa, KA) and recorded at 5-minute intervals. Muscle relaxation
From the Departments ofAnesthesiology and Clinical Investigation, Naval Hospital, San Diego, CA. Sponsored by the Chief Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Washington, DC, Clinical Investigation Program, No. S-94-001. This paper was presented in part at the Anesthesia Update 1994 Meeting, University of Wisconsin, at Copper Mountain, CO, February 8, 1994. The views expressed m this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the oficial policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Depattment of Defense, or the United States Government. Address reprint requests to LCDR J.D. Swenson, MD, USNR, c/o Clinical Investigation Department, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92134-5000. This is a USgovernment work. There are no restrictions on its use. 1053-0770/94/0805-0005$00.00/0
Journalof Cardiothoracicand VascularAnesthesia, Vol8, No 5 (October), 1994: pp 509-514
509
SWENSON
510
was maintained
by supplemental doses of vecuronium, 0.07 mgikg IV. was given immediately before
Table 2. Operative Details for Patients Receiving
and mid-
bypass and again during rewarming to prevent awareness. After initiation of CPB the patients were cooled to 28°C. After separation from azolam,
bypass, patients were treated with sodium nitroprusside and/or dopamine to maintain a cardiac index greater than 2.5 L/minim’ and/or a systolic pressure of 100 to 120 mmHg. Anesthesia after CPB was maintained with isoflurane without IV opioids. Following surgery, a standard cardiac protocol was used including mechanical ventilation to maintain normocarbia and treatment of pain with morphine, 1.0-5.0 mg/h IV. Sodium nitroprusside was given by infusion to treat hypertension. After ensuring normothermia, neostigmine, 0.05 mgikg, and glycopyrrolate, 0.01 mgikg IV, were given as needed to reverse residual neuromuscular blockade. The ICU staff frequently assessed the level of patient awareness and comfort, and the earliest appropriate response to verbal commands was recorded in the computerized nursing notes. The criteria established for tracheal extubation were (1) hemodynamic stability without inotropic support, (2) minimal chest tube drainage, and (3) spontaneous ventilation for 30 minutes with a PaC02 < SO mmHg, pH greater than 7.30, and Pa02 greater than 75 mmHg on an F102 less than 0.40. Following extubation, arterial blood gas values on 50% oxygen via face mask were measured after 30 minutes. Analgesia was maintained with IV morphine as required. The manually recorded anesthesia record was used to obtain hemodynamic data, dosage and timing of anesthetic agents, and CPB details in the operative period. The time to extubation, analgesic requirements, vasoactive drug dosage, and any complications were derived from the computerized ICU nursing record that had been compiled during the postoperative period. Numerical values are expressed as means + SEM. RESULTS
The demographic data for patients described in this series are shown in Table 1. Operative details, including the type of procedure performed, duration of bypass, and aortic cross-clamp time are recorded in Table 2. Eight patients had coronary artery bypass graft surgery, whereas one patient underwent tricuspid valve replacement and one had repair of atria1 and ventricular septal defects. All lumbar punctures were performed in a holding area adjacent to the operating room without reported difficulty. No patient became unresponsive before induction of anesthesia in the operating room. The mean time between lumbar puncture and intubation was 18 minutes (range 9-33 minutes). Esmolol was required in 8 of 10 patients to blunt
lntrathecal Sufentanil ___.
_____-
CPB Patient
Time
Procedure
Aortic
(min)
Cross-Clamp
Time
(mm)
1
CABG
48
33
2
CABG
75
45
3
CABG
104
56
4
ASDIVSD
60
30
5
CABG
57
48
6
CABG
76
46
7
CABG
32
15
8
CABG
79
50
CABG
113
57
92
70
9 10
NR
73 2 8
45 + 5
NOTE. Values expressed as Mean -c SEM. Abbreviations:
CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; TVR, tricuspid
valve replacement; ASD, atrial septal defect; VSD, ventricular septal defect.
only the hemodynamic response to intubation. The systolic pressure and heart rate remained stable between induction and initiation of CPB (Figs 1 and 2). The end-tidal isoflurane concentration required to maintain stability fluctuated minimally (0.4%-0.6%) during sternotomy, mediastinal dissection, and cannulation of the great vessels (Fig 3). No patient received IV narcotic during anesthesia (Table 3). The bypass period was uneventful for all patients, and there were no intraoperative surgical complications that would have necessitated delaying extubation. Upon separation from bypass, 2 of 10 patients received less than 5.0 kglkglmin of dopamine, and 4 of 10 received sodium nitroprusside, 051.0 p,g/kg/min, to maintain systolic blood pressure within the prescribed limits. Times from arrival in the ICU to awakening and to extubation were 1.3 ” 0.2 hours and 6.3 +- 1.4 hours, respectively (Table 4). Eight patients were extubated within 8 hours of arrival in the ICU (Fig 4). Two patients remained intubated and ventilated
150k 130 G I E
Table 1. Demographic Data
ET Ai
-
llO-
E Patient
Age
(yrsl
Sex
Height
(cm)
Weight
(kg) 0
1
63
M
183
90
2
56
M
182
79
3
61
M
185
80
4
43
F
152
62
5
47
M
175
70
6
40
M
173
103
7
69
M
170
90
8
61
M
165
75
9
42
M
177
98
10
28
F
160
62
51 t4
8M/2F
174&3
NOTE. Values expressed as Mean 5 SEM.
81 -f 5
go
-
70
-
2
50
. I
.
. 10
.
. 20
.
Tune N=
10
10
10
. 30
.
After
lntubation
10
. 40
10
.
. 50
.
. 60
.
. 70
.
. 60
.
, 90
(minutes) 10
10
6
4
1
Fig 1. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) recorded at B-minute intervals from the time of intubation (I) until initiation of CPB. The number of patients IN) approaches 0 as succaesive patients are placed on CPB. Data are preaentad ae mean * SEM.
INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL FOR CARDIAC SURGERY
511
Table 3. Total Intravenous Narcotic (morphine oulphate, mg) Administered lntraoperatively
and During 12 and 24 Hours
After lntrathecal Injection Patient
Narcotics
12
Hours
24 Hours 20 2 0 0 10 1 0 10
0
.
I
.
.
.
10
20
10
10
N=lO Fig 2. time of patients Data are
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30 40 50 60 Tima After lntubation (minutes) 10
10
10
10
.
.
.
9
.
70
60
90
8
4
1
10
The heart rate (HR) recorded at 5-minute intervals from the intubation (I) until the initiation of CPB. The number of (N) approaches 0 as successive patients are placed on CPB. presented as mean f SEM.
more than 8 hours for treatment of an increased alveolar-toarterial oxygen gradient and persistent hypotension. These patients were subsequently extubated without further incident. Arterial blood gas measurements 30 minutes after extubation were satisfactory in all patients (Table 5). The mean PaC02 was 42.0 + 1.1 mmHg and the mean Pa02 (on 50% O2 via face mask) was 137.0 + 18.0 mmHg. No patient required reintubation or naloxone for respiratory depression. The mean IV morphine requirement was 1.6 f 0.9 mg (range O-8) during the first 12 hours after the intrathecal injection, with 7 of 10 patients requiring no additional pain medication. The 24-hour supplemental morphine requirements were 8.2 * 3.1 mg (range O-29), with 3 of 10 patients still needing no analgesics (Table 3). The requirements for nitroprusside after arrival in the ICU are shown in Fig 5. The mean infusion rate of sodium nitroprusside (0.48 + 0.2
E
0
4
29
0
4
10
0
1.6 k 0.9
8.2 + 3.1
NOTE. Values expressed
as Mean
2 SEM.
ug/kg/min) was highest in the first hour and declined rapidly over the following 6 hours. DISCUSSION
Opioid-based anesthesia has been popular for patients undergoing cardiac surgery since the 1970s when studies demonstrated its ability to ensure hemodynamic stability in patients with marginal cardiac reserve.16J7 The beneficial cardiovascular effects of high-dose IV narcotic anesthesia are offset by the need to provide prolonged ventilatory support to manage the postoperative respiratory depression associated with this technique. The practice of continuing ventilatory support for up to 24 hours in patients undergoing cardiac surgery has been widely accepted.18,i9 Some anesthesiologists also advocate prolonged sedation and analgesia to decrease myocardial oxygen demand and reduce ischemia in the early postoperative period.20 Recently, however, the practice of prolonged sedation and ventilatory support has been more closely examined. Several author@ advocate early extubation (within 8 hours of arrival in the intensive care unit) for patients who meet acceptable preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative criteria. If early extubation is anticipated, the anesthetic technique should provide conditions that allow stable intraoperative hemodynamics, rapid emergence, and early
3
2
.6-
7 ; z
Table 4. Time (hours) to Following Commands and Extubation
.
1
Patient
.4-
. .a -
0’.
. s
N= 10
.
10 10
.
.
.
.
1..
.
20 30 40 Time (minutes) After Sternotomy 10
10
10
50 a
.
.
.’
60 4
1
Fig 3. The percentage of end-tidal isoflurane recorded at B-minute intervals from stemotomy (S) until the initiation of CPB. The number of patients (N) approaches 0 as successive patients are placed on CPB. Data are expressed as mean f SEM.
Values
Following Commands
Extubation
1
1.1
4.7
2
1.5
5.5
3
1.5
3.5
4
0.3
2.0
5
1.5
5.3
6
2.0
17.5
7
0.7
9.9
8
1.6
4.2
9
1.5
7.5
10
2.0
3.0
1.3 f 0.2
6.3 ” 1.4
expressed
as Mean
? SEM.
SWENSON
123456789
10
11
12
Time (hours) After Arrivalin ICU Fig 4. The percentage of patients remaining intubated after arrival in the intensive care unit recorded at l-hour intervals.
restoration of spontaneous ventilation, yet still provide excellent postoperative analgesia. Both morphine and sufentanil are F-receptor agonists with activity at C-fiber terminals in the spinal cord. Recent studies suggest, however, that the efficacy of sufentanil is significantly greater than that of morphine.15**l,**The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil, as described by Hansdottir et a1,23 show a mean residence time of 0.92 hours in the intrathecal space with low plasma concentrations, making it a suitable agent when early restoration of spontaneous ventilation is desired. Higher dose IT sufentanil combined with IT morphine, therefore, was chosen to achieve potent intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, but still allow early extubation. Although not specifically questioned about side effects, patients appeared to tolerate the IT opioids well, with only mild complaints of pruritus postoperatively. The mean interval between lumbar puncture and anesthetic induction was 18 minutes (range 9-33 minutes) with all patients remaining responsive until given midazolam to produce unconsciousness. Esmolol was required in 8 of 10 patients during largngoscopy and intubation as the sufentanil did not reliably attenuate the hemodynamic response.
Table 5. Results of Arterial Blood Gas Samples 30 Minutes After Extubation With Patient Breathing 50% Oxygen by Face Mask Patient
PaO?(mmHg)
PaCOZ(mmHgl
PH
1
180
41
7.37
2
154
38
7.37
3
117
40
7.40
4
238
48
7.31
5
89
41
7.39
6
99
41
7.41
7
95
40
7.38
8
78
48
7.29
9
101
41
7.36
10
214
44
7.27
137 t- 18.0
42 2 1.1
7.36 lr 0.02
NOTE. Values expressed as Mean f SEM.
1
2
3 4 5 6 7 Time (hours)After ArrivalnnICU
8
9
El Ai.
10
Fig 5. The mean dose of nitroprusside (pg/kg/min) required for blood pressure control recorded at l-hour intervals after arrival in the intensive care unit. Data are expressed as mean f SEM.
However, during mediastinal dissection the mean end-tidal concentration of isoflurane (Fig 1) required to maintain the mean systolic arterial pressure at 100 to 130 mmHg was only 0.4% to 0.6%. IT opioids, therefore, appeared to reduce volatile anesthetic requirements during mediastinal dissection, but offered little benefit for tracheal intubation. The analgesic actions of IT opioids are at the C-fiber terminals of the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn, but the pathways for nociception of bronchi and trachea are predominantly by A-fibers2” travelling in the vagus nerve to its brainstem nucleus. The mean time interval between lumbar injection of sufentanil and tracheal intubation was 18 minutes in these patients, which makes sufficient cephalad spread to the brainstem unlikely. There are no known spinal opioid receptors at the A-fiber terminals,2s and it is unknown whether opioids in the cerebrospinal fluid at the level of the vagal nucleus could significantly alter responses to noxious stimuli in the trachea. The mean heart rate during the period from intubation to initiation of CPB was 63.0 2 4.2 beatsimin and resembled the stability seen in cases using moderate to high-dose IV opioid anesthetic techniques.‘,i7 The bradycardia associated with IV opioids has been attributed to their action in the central vagal nucleus,26 and a similar mechanism may apply if large doses of sufentanil result in increasing concentrations near the brainstem after lumbar IT administration. The patients in this series were considered candidates for early extubation because they had well-preserved pulmonary and left ventricular function. The mean time from the patient arriving in the ICU to awakening and following commands was 1.3 2 0.2 hours, with time to extubation being 6.3 ? 1.4 hours. The interval from awakening to extubation likely reflects the concern by the surgeons to allow adequate time for complete rewarming, ensure adequate hemostasis, and overcome the period of maximal myocardial depression, which typically occurs 3 to 5 hours after separation from bypass.z7 Postoperatively, tracheal extubation was achieved in all
INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL FOR CARDIAC SURGERY
513
but two patients within 8 hours. Neither of the patients who remained intubated had problems related to the IT opioids. The mean resting PaCOz of 42.0 + 1.1 mmHg and PaOz (on 50% 02 via face mask) of 137.0 f 18.0 mmHg 30 minutes after extubation show lack of excessive sedation and respiratory depression. Evidence of good analgesia is provided by the low mean IV morphine requirements. Seven patients required no additional analgesia, and the group mean dosage was only 1.6 2 0.9 mg during the first 12 hours postoperatively. This decreased IV narcotic demand is an expected result of prolonged analgesia from IT morphine. However, this effect may be augmented by the preemptive suppression of afferent transmission by IT opioids as described by Abram and Yaksh.28 They demonstrated a marked attenuation of response to subsequent noxious stimuli after prior administration of IT morphine. Other investigators have studied the effects of IT morphine in cardiac surgery patients with regard to hemodynamic stability, volatile anesthetic requirements, and postoperative analgesia.29,30 These patients, however, all received large doses of IV fentanyl or sufentanil intraoperatively, thus making it difficult to define any added effect of IT opioid. Additionally, those trials did not address using IT narcotics as a method of facilitating early extubation.
In this series, no patient received intraoperative IV opioids and postoperative analgesic requirements were low. These results, therefore, can be interpreted as more accurately reflecting the beneficial action of the intrathecal agents alone. Vanstrum et a129reported no neurologic complications in approximately 1,000 patients who received spinal opioids before cardiac surgery. There remains, however, a theoretical risk of a spinal or epidural hematoma after lumbar puncture in patients who will receive anticoagulants. All of these patients had normal preoperative coagulation function, and surgery would have been delayed in the event of a traumatic puncture. The combination of IT sufentanil and morphine provided stable intraoperative hemodynamics and allowed early extubation in the majority of these patients with good respiratory and ventricular function. It is believed that controlled prospective studies are needed to ascertain whether the technique of providing potent perioperative analgesia with this combination of opioids administered intrathecally does offer significant advantages over existing methods and to determine the optimal dose of IT sufentanil.
REFERENCES 1. Higgins TL: Pro: Early endotracheal extubation is preferable
to late extubation in patients following coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vast Anesth 6:488-493,1992 2. Quasha AL, Loeber N, Feely TW, et al: Postoperative respiratory care: A controlled trial of early and late extubation following coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 52:135141,198O 3. Shapiro BA: Inhalation-based anesthetic techniques are the key to early extubation of the cardiac surgical patient. J Cardiothorat Vast Anesth 71135136,1993 4. Joachimsson PO, Nystrom SO, Tyden H, et al: Early extubation after coronary artery surgery in efficiently rewarmed patients: A postoperative comparison of opioid anesthesia versus inhalational anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia. J Cardiothoracic Vast Anesth 3:444-454,1989 5. Shafer SL, Varvel JR: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology 74:53-63,199l 6. Cartwright P, Prys-Roberts C, Gill K, et al: Ventilatory depression related to plasma fentanyl concentrations during and after anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg 62:966-974,1983 7. Samuelson PN, Reves JG, Kirklin JK, et al: Comparison of sufentanil and enflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia for myocardial revascularization. Anesth Analg 65:217-226,1986 8. Wang JK, Nauss LA, Thomas JE: Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anesthesiology 50:149-151,1979 9. Behar M, Olshwang D, Magora F, et al: Epidural morphine in treatment of pain. Lancet 1:527-529,1979 10. Benedetti C: Intraspinal analgesia: An historical overview. Acta Anaesthesiol Stand Suppl31:17-24,1987 11. Bailey PL, Rhondeau S, Schafer PG, et al: Dose-response pharmacology of intrathecal morphine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology 79:49-59,1993 12. Drasner K, Bernards CM, Ozanne GM: Intrathecal morphine reduces the minimal alveolar concentration of halothane in humans. Anesthesiology 69:310-312,1988
13. Cohen E, Neustein SM: Intrathecal morphine during thoracotomy. Part 1: Effect on intraoperative enflurane requirements. J Cardiothorac Vast Anesth 7:154-156,1993 14. Swenson JD, Hullander RM: The effect of intrathecal sufentanil on isoflurane requirements during lower abdominal surgery: Results of a double-blind study. Anesthesiology 79:345A, 1993 15. Aoki M, Senami M, Kitahata LM, et al: Spinal sufentanil effects on spinal pain transmission neurons in cats. Anesthesiology 64:225-229,1986 16. Stoelting RK, Gibbs PS, Cresser CW, et al: Hemodynamics and ventilatory responses to fentanyl, fentanyl-droperidol and nitrous oxide in patients with acquired valvular disease. Anesthesiology 42:319-324,1975 17. Stanley TH, Webster LR: Anesthetic requirements and cardiovascular effects of fentanyl-oxygen and fentanyl-diazepamoxygen anesthesia in man. Anesth Analg 57:411-416,1976 18. Siliciano D: Con: Early extubation is not preferable to late extubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vast Anesth 6:494-498,1992 19. Lefamine A, Harken D: Postoperative care following open heart operations: Routine use of controlled ventilation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52:207-216,1966 20. Mangano DT, Siliciano D, Hollenberg M, et al: Postoperative myocardial ischemia; therapeutic trials using intensive analgesia following surgery. Anesthesiology 76:342-353,1992 21. Mjanger E, Yaksh TL: Characteristics of dose-dependent antagonism by betafunaltrexamine on the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal agonists. .J Pharmacol Exp Ther 258:544-550,199l 22. Saeki S, Yaksh TL: Suppression of nociceptive responses by spinal opioid agonists: Effects of stimulus intensity and agonist efficacy. Anesth Analg 77:265-274,1993 23. Hansdottir V, Hedner T, Woestenbroghs R, et al: The CSF and plasma pharmacokinetics of sufentanil after intrathecal administration. Anesthesiology 74:264-269,199l
SWENSON ET AL
514
24. Bonica JJ: Anatomic and physiologic basis of nociception and pain, in Bonica JJ, Loeser JD, Chapman CR, et al (eds). The Management of Pain, vol 1. London, Lea & Febiger, 1990, pp 79-94. 25. Abram SE: Advances in chronic gate control. Reg Anesth l&66-81,1993
pain
management
since
26. Reitan JA, Stengert KB, Wymore MC, et al: Central vagal control or fentanyl-induced bradycardia during halothane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 57:31-36,1978 27. Breisblatt
WM, Stein KL, Wolfe CJ, et al: Acute myocardial
dysfunction and recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. .I Am Co11 Cardiol 15:1261-1269, 1990 28. Abram SE, Yaksh TL: Morphine, but not inhalation anesthesia, blocks post-injury facilitation. Anesthesiology 78x713-721, 1993 29. Vanstrum GS, Bjornson KM. Ilko R: Postoperative effects of intrathecal morphine in coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 67:261-267, 1988 30. Casey WF, Wynands JE, Ralley FE, et al: The role of intrathecal morphine in the anesthetic management of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vast Anesth 1:510-516, 1987