Journal Pre-proof East Asian summer monsoon and topography co-determine the Holocene migration of forest-steppe ecotone in northern China
Ying Cheng, Hongyan Liu, Zhibao Dong, Keqin Duan, Hongya Wang, Yue Han PII:
S0921-8181(20)30025-4
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103135
Reference:
GLOBAL 103135
To appear in:
Global and Planetary Change
Received date:
26 November 2019
Revised date:
4 February 2020
Accepted date:
4 February 2020
Please cite this article as: Y. Cheng, H. Liu, Z. Dong, et al., East Asian summer monsoon and topography co-determine the Holocene migration of forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, Global and Planetary Change(2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.gloplacha.2020.103135
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier.
Journal Pre-proof
East Asian summer monsoon and topography co-determine the Holocene migration of forest-steppe ecotone in northern China
f
Ying Cheng1 , Hongyan Liu2,* , Zhibao Dong1 , Keqin Duan1 , Hongya Wang2 , Yue Han2
Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
pr
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences and MOE Laboratory for Earth Surface,
e-
2.
oo
1. School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710119, China
Jo u
rn
al
Pr
* Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Journal Pre-proof
Abstract Forest-steppe ecotones are generally regarded as very sensitive to climate change. However, it is still unclear whether they can be used to track past climate changes due to the combined effects of climate forcing and topographic factors. We first explored shifts of the whole forest-steppe ecotone in northern China during the Holocene by collecting 383 topsoil pollen
f
samples to establish discriminant functions representative of forest, forest-steppe ecotone, and
oo
temperate steppe. The discriminant functions were applied to 39 fossil pollen sites to reconstruct
pr
the range of the forest-steppe ecotone during the Holocene. Our results showed that the shift of
e-
the forest-steppe ecotone exhibited a generally consistent trend with the intensity of the EASM,
Pr
which was characterized by southward retreat during the early Holocene from 12,000–8000 cal. yr BP, northward expansion during the middle Holocene from 8000–4000 cal. yr BP, and
al
southward retreat during the late Holocene from 4000–0 cal. yr BP, suggesting a dominant role
rn
of precipitation provided by the EASM. However, some sites in mountainous regions still
Jo u
indicated forest group membership within the ecotone, implying possible vertical forest migration. We stress that EASM and topography co-determine the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, and mountainous terrain differences also benefit the vertical forest migrations when threatened by the dry climate. Our study implies that future climate change may cause three-dimensional changes in vegetation, which should be considered in climate change mitigation.
Key words: Pollen, forest-steppe ecotone, East Asian summer monsoon, topography, Holocene
Journal Pre-proof
1. Introduction Global climate change has caused a dramatic change in vegetation distribution at an unprecedented rate (Allen and Breshears, 1998; Harrison and Prentice, 2003; Liu et al., 2013). The boundaries between ecosystems, such as the forest-steppe ecotone in the semi-arid region, show extremely high sensitivity to such changes (Allen and Breshears, 1998; Allen et
f
al., 2010; Goldblum and Rigg, 2010; Liu et al., 2013). However, due to long lifespan of trees
oo
and limited dispersal of forest species (Matthias et al., 2015), it is difficult to detect changes in
pr
the latitudinal ranges of the forest-steppe ecotone in response to recent climate changes
e-
(Beckage et al., 2008). The range of the forest-steppe ecotone across the landscape depends on
Pr
the climate; thus, the long-term shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in the past may provide insights into the response patterns of the forest-steppe ecotone to climate change. The Holocene (11,500
al
cal. yr BP to the present), a period characterized by natural climate forcing, appears to be an ideal
Jo u
forest-steppe ecotone.
rn
analogue for investigating and predicting the impact of climate change on the shift of the
The forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, which is located in the marginal area of the East Asian summer monsoon, is in a critical state threatened by dry climate, where precipitation depends on the strength of the EASM (Xu et al., 2017). Although forest ecosystems are expected to migrate towards higher elevations and polar regions in response to climate warming (e.g., Chen et al., 2011; Seidl et al., 2017), it is still unclear what type of relationship will be exhibited by the forest-steppe ecotone in response to EASM and how strong the relationship will be between long-term EASM forcing and the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone (Beckage et al., 2008). Furthermore, ecotone shifts should be observed on regional or continental scales to detect
Journal Pre-proof
the vulnerability of these ecotones under dry climate condition, but many empirical studies are severely limited to local scale. For example, there is strong evidence indicating the local vegetation evolution and its relationship with the EASM in northern China (e.g., Xiao et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2017), and few studies have evaluated the northern Chinese forest-steppe ecotone as a whole to determine its shifting pattern (Liu et al. 2001; Hao et al.,
f
2016), which is a typical ecologically vulnerable transition from the continental-scale perspective.
oo
Therefore, it is necessary to pay close attention to the Holocene shifting pattern of the
pr
forest-steppe ecotone on a large spatial scale under the influence of the EASM.
e-
Different from other latitudinal ecotones in the world, the mountains overlay the forest-steppe
Pr
ecotone in northern China, where topography differences are significant. The diverse mountain environment has shaped unique topography in northern China since the Late Miocene (Zhai et
al
al., 2006; Yin et al., 2013). It is also very important to see whether the forest-steppe ecotone in
rn
northern China was three-dimensional considering the topography factor, which has been widely
Jo u
considered to be very sensitive to climate change (e.g., Goldblum and Rigg, 2010; Cheng et al., 2017). Some studies have indicated the influence of topographic factors on vegetation migration in China. For example, at the continental scale, there was a study specifically indicating that the topography mediated the climate-driven Holocene biome migration in western and eastern China (Cheng et al., 2018). At the regional scale, paleoecological evidence has shown that topography strongly affects the vertical migration of forests in the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China (Hao et al., 2016). At the local scale, the resilience of a forest suggests a strong buffering effect of topography on the southeastern Inner Mongolian Plateau of China, which allowed forest ecosystems to survive during the Holocene drought events (Yin et al., 2013). Evidence based on
Journal Pre-proof
different spatial scales together suggests that topographical factors may affect the shift of forest-steppe ecotones. However, until now, very few studies have systematically investigated whether such terrain differences exert control over the shift of forest-steppe ecotone in northern China. Can the significant terrain differences with mountain barriers promote or inhibit the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone?
f
In this study, we aimed to explore the following scientific questions: (1) How did the position
oo
of the forest-steppe ecotone evolve during the Holocene? (2) How did the shift of the
pr
forest-steppe ecotone respond to the EASM? (3) Was the forest-steppe ecotone migration
e-
three-dimensional?
Pr
2. Study area and methods 2.1 Study area
al
The forest-steppe ecotone is located at the transition between the semi-humid and semi-arid
rn
areas in northern China, which is a broad area with relatively clear boundaries and basically
Jo u
along the 400 mm precipitation line (Fig. 1a). In and near the modern forest-steppe ecotone, the Great Khiigan Mountains (43º– 53.50ºN, 117.33º– 126ºE, 1100–1400 m a.s.l.), Yinshan (42ºN, 106º– 116ºE, 400–2000 m a.s.l.), and Helan (38.35º–39.37ºN, 105.82º– 106.68ºE, 2000–3556 m a.s.l.) Mountains stretch from east to west, while the Taihang (34.57º–40.72ºN, 110.23º– 114.55ºE, 2000–3556 m a.s.l.), Lvliang (35º–39ºN, 110º–112ºE, 1000–2831 m a.s.l.), and Liupan Mountains (35º– 37ºN, 106º– 110ºE, average elevations 2000–2500 m a.s.l.) extend from north to south. Among them, the Yanshan Mountains (2293 m a.s.l.), which extend from east to west, are distributed north of the Taihang Mountains. Specifically, there are two 400 mm precipitation lines, which are roughly on both sides of the mountain in northern China. The
Journal Pre-proof
annual average temperature in this area is approximately 0–6 °C, and the average annual precipitation is approximately 350–450 mm (Hao et al., 2016). The climate in this area is mainly controlled by the East Asian summer monsoon, which brings precipitation from June to August. The Siberian-Mongolian high-pressure system dominates cold and dry climate in winter (Hao et al., 2016).
f
The forest-steppe ecotone is a transitional zone where forest meets steppe across a climatic
oo
gradient (Liu et al., 2010), which is the northernmost boundary of modern forest distribution
pr
with an arid timberline in China. We specifically defined the modern range of the forest-steppe
e-
ecotone by combining the newly published definition of forest-steppe (Erdős et al., 2018) and
Pr
the 400 mm precipitation line, obtaining the area where they overlap (Fig. 1a). The continuous forest is distributed south of this ecotone, and the temperate steppe is distributed to the north.
al
Specifically, Pinus, Betula, and Quercus dominate the adjacent southern continuous forest (Hao
rn
et al., 2016). Artemisia, Amaranthaceae, and Poaceae dominate the northern temperate steppe.
Jo u
The above species co-exist in the forest-steppe ecotone. The topsoil pollen sites used in this study are typically distributed in or near the modern forest-steppe ecotone (Fig. 1b). Among them, 97 are distributed in the forest-steppe ecotone, 102 are distributed in the forest zone, and 184 are distributed in the temperate steppe zone (Fig. 1b and Table S1). The fossil pollen sites we used are generally distributed in or near the modern forest-steppe ecotone (Fig. 1b). Among them, 14 are distributed in the modern forest-steppe ecotone, 16 are distributed in the forest zone, and 9 are distributed in the temperate steppe zone (Fig. 1b and Table S2).
e-
pr
oo
f
Journal Pre-proof
Pr
Fig. 1. The forest-steppe ecotone in northern China. a. The yellow area represents the modern range of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, and the associated 400 mm and 200 mm
al
precipitation lines, as well as their relations with the East Asian summer monsoon. b. Digital
rn
elevation model image of the study area, the distribution of fossil pollen sites (black triangle),
Jo u
and topsoil pollen sites (blue circle). There are two 400 mm precipitation lines, which are roughly on both sides of the mountain where there are significant terrain differences. The two sides of the mountains are the forest-steppe ecotone.
2.2 Topsoil and sediment pollen data collections We collected 383 topsoil pollen samples covering different vegetation zones in northern China, including forest, forest-steppe ecotone, and temperate steppe (Fig. 1b and Table S1). The topsoil pollen data used in this study was selected from the sites with minimal disturbance from human activities (Table S1). For the samples collected in our research group (Table S1), mosses and the upper part of the soil were collected carefully at each sampling site. Then pollen was extracted by treating with acid and alkali, and floated with heavy liquid using standard techniques (Moore
Journal Pre-proof
et al., 1991). Finally, a minimum of 200 pollen grains were counted for each sample under an Olympus optical microscope at 400× magnification. Specifically, the species composition of the topsoil pollen, the proportion of taxa in topsoil pollen assemblages, and their relationship with actual vegetation were analysed in detail (Liu et al., 1999). We selected 39 fossil pollen sites in northern China and digitized all the pollen taxa using
14
C ages for the entire record were
oo
basically met the following requirements: 1) at least four
f
GetData Graph Digitizer v2.25 software (Fig. 1b and Table S2). The selected sequences
pr
measured in the original paper; 2) the temporal resolution was at least 200 years; 3) the 14
C dates
e-
sequences were near the modern forest-steppe ecotone in northern China. The original
with IntCal13 (Reimer et al., 2013).
al
2.3 Discriminant analysis
Pr
in the selected sequences were converted to calendar years (cal. yr BP) using Calib Rev 7.0.4
rn
Discriminant analysis is a method of classifying samples into groups based on calculated
Jo u
probabilities (Liu et al., 2001), which was conducted in SPSS software in our study. Discriminant analysis first attempts to derive a linear combination of variables by using the samples with known group memberships, which will ensure maximum separation between a priori sample sets and are then used to classify new samples with unknown group membership into a priori groups (Liu and Lam, 1985; Liu et al., 2010). By using this technique, we investigated the Holocene distribution of the northern Chinese forest-steppe ecotone based on topsoil pollen. Finally, we inferred the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone by comparing the palaeovegetation types among these sediment sequences. We used 10 proxies of topsoil pollen data, including Pinus, Betula, Quercus, Artemisia,
Journal Pre-proof
Amaranthaceae, forest/Coniferous
Poaceae, forest
arboreal (B/C),
pollen/non-arboreal
Broadleaf
pollen
forest/Non-arboreal
(AP/NAP), pollen
Broadleaf
(B/NAP),
and
Artemisia/Amaranthaceae (Ar/Am), to establish the discriminant functions for forest, forest-steppe ecotone, and temperate steppe. Among the proxies, Pinus tabuliformis, Quercus mongolica, Betula dahurica, and Betula platyphylla are the most frequent and unique forest
f
types in northern China, with the distribution corresponding to the northern edge of the summer
oo
monsoon (Liu et al., 1999; Shi et al., 2008; Hao et al., 2016). Pinus tabuliformis can tolerate
pr
cold and dry climates. Quercus mongolica generally prefers warm and humid climates, while it
e-
can still endure relatively cold and dry climates. Betula dahurica and Betula platyphylla
Pr
basically live in the hardy mountainous area. Artemisia, Amaranthaceae, and Poaceae are very common, which dominate the modern temperate steppe in northern China. The difference is that
al
Artemisia typically requires more moisture than Amaranthaceae during the growing season
rn
(Zhao et al., 2012). Moreover, we used ratios including AP/NAP, B/C, B/NAP, and Ar/Am to
3. Results
Jo u
avoid misjudgement due to the relativity of pollen percentages among sequences.
3.1 The relationship between topsoil pollen and modern vegetation According to the summary statistics for the topsoil pollen samples, the percentages of each taxon in the three vegetation zones are obviously different (Table 1). In the forest zone, Pinus (31.4%), Betula (16.5%), Quercus (4.5%), and Artemisia (6.4%) pollen dominate. In the forest-steppe ecotone, Betula (5.8%), Artemisia (60.3%), Amaranthaceae (13.7%), and Poaceae (5.1%) pollen dominate. In the steppe zone, Artemisia (41.7%), Amaranthaceae (44.0%), and Poaceae (4.7%) dominate.
Journal Pre-proof Table 1 Summary statistics of topsoil pollen samples in different vegetation zones . Pollen taxon
Forest
Forest-steppe
Mean
Standard deviations
Pinus
31.4
19.9
4.4
8.8
2.0
5.0
Betula
6.4
14.6
5.8
10.2
0.3
0.6
Standard deviations
Mean
Standard deviations
7.9
0.3
1.2
0.0
0.2
11.2 2.6
60.3 13.7
24.7 13.5
41.7 44.0
22.4 23.7
Poaceae AP/NAP
2.3 3.5
2.6 4.2
5.1 0.3
7.4 0.8
4.7 0.1
8.5 0.2
B/C
1.0
2.6
3.3
7.6
0.3
0.4
B/NAP Ar/Am
1.1
3.0
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
5.5
5.3
10.2
14.1
1.9
3.5
f
4.5 16.5 3.4
pr
Artemisia Amaranthaceae
oo
Quercus
Mean
Steppe
e-
In discriminant analys is, we chose Pinus (x1), Betula (x2), Quercus (x3), Artemisia (x4),
Pr
Amaranthaceae (x5), Poaceae (x6), AP/NAP (x7), B/C (x8), B/NAP (x9), and Ar/Am (x10) as independent variables based on their importance in reflecting different vegetation zones. Known
al
vegetation zones are used as dependent variables. Table 2 gives the formulas of the discriminant
rn
functions for each vegetation zone. Based on the known vegetation zones, the discriminant
Jo u
functions have adjusted the relationship between topsoil pollen and actual vegetation by coefficients despite the facts that some families or genera have over-or under-representation and the possible effects of wind transported taxa (Liu et al., 1999; Sugita, 2007a, b). However, it is worth noting that the uncertainty arises from the use of topsoil to establish the discriminant function and its application to sediment records in terms of the different source areas and levels of preservation between topsoil pollen and sediment records (Jacobson and Bradshaw, 1981). Basically, the range of the relevant pollen source area increases with the increase of the sedimentary basin area, and the source area of the topsoil sample is smaller than the lake surface sediment sample (Sugita, 2007a, b). In addition, compared to the sedimentary
Journal Pre-proof
environment, pollen grains can be rapidly oxidized in topsoil, thereby reducing the diversity in the sample, and only the grains with strongest or thickest exines are preserved (Jacobson and Bradshaw, 1981; Sugita, 2007a, b). Table 2 The discriminant functions for each vegetation zone. Vegetation zone
Discriminant function
Forest
f 1 = 0.413x1 + 0.475x2 + 0.473x3 + 0.317x4 + 0.293x5 + 0.396x6 + 1.113x7 + 0.022x8 -1.492 x9 + 0.033x10 - 14.978 f 2 = 0.329x1 + 0.652x2 + 0.260x3 + 0.558x4 + 0.501x5 + 0.667x6 + 1.498x7 + 0.089x8 -2.729 x9 - 0.010x10 – 25.859
oo
f
Forest-steppe
f 3 = 0.302x1 + 0.559x2 + 0.232x3 + 0.569x4 + 0.590x5 + 0.674x6 + 1.450x7 0.093x8 -2.236 x9 - 0.093x10 – 27.829
pr
Steppe
e-
By comparing the objectively predicted group membership with a priori group membership, it
Pr
was found that the discriminant function classified 90% of the topsoil pollen samples into the
al
correct vegetation zone (Table 3). Most of the misclassified samples occurred near the ecotone. Table 3 Classification results of the topsoil pollen samples. Total number of samples
Jo u
rn
Actual group
Predicted group membership Number
Percentage
Forest Forest-steppe
102 97
99 82
97% 85%
Steppe
184
165
90%
* The average percentage of the topsoil pollen samples correctly classified is 90%. 3.2 Holocene shift of the forest-steppe ecotone Late-Glacial to Early Holocene transition : from 12,000–10,000 cal. yr BP, the forest-steppe ecotone developed in latitudes stretching between 37.56°N (constrained by Zhuyeze, Yujiagou, and Huanghua) and 40.45°N (constrained by Diaojiaohaizi, Chasuqi, Taipusi, and Haoluku), which is obviously larger than the current range of the forest-steppe ecotone (Fig. 2a and Tables
Journal Pre-proof
4, S2, and S4); from 10,000–8000 cal. yr BP, the range of the forest-steppe ecotone did not change compared with the last stage (Fig. 2b and Tables 4, S2, and S4). Within the range of the forest-steppe ecotone during the early Holocene, although most of the sites showed forest-steppe type, some still featured forest, and very few featured temperate steppe without obvious southward or northward expansions (Figs. 2a and b).
f
Middle Holocene: from 8000–6000 cal. yr BP, the forest-steppe ecotone migrated to the north,
oo
with its southern boundary tending to remain stable at 39.35°N (constrained by Yujiagou,
pr
Sujiawan, and Jiangjunpaozi), and the northern boundary migrated northward to 41.87°N
e-
(constrained by Zhuyeze, Gaoximage, and Sanyi) (Fig. 2c and Tables 4, S2, and S4); from
Pr
6000–4000 cal. yr BP, the southern and northern boundaries of the forest-steppe ecotone did not change much (Fig. 2d and Tables 4, S2, and S4). Notably, the forest-steppe ecotone featured a
al
mixture of transitional vegetation types and forest during the middle Holocene, when forests
rn
were staggered throughout the ecotone (Figs. 2c and d).
Jo u
Late Holocene: from 4000–2000 cal. yr BP, the forest-steppe ecotone migrated to the south, its southern and northern boundary migrated to 38.55°N (constrained by Wangxianggou and Dadiwan) and 40.53°N (constrained by Gaoximage, Sanyi, and Dadiwan), respectively (Fig. 2e and Tables 4, S2, and S4); from 2000 cal. yr BP to present, the southern boundary of the forest-steppe ecotone shifted southward, reaching 38.35°N (constrained by Wangxianggou, Niangziguan, Huanghua, and Dadiwan), and the northern boundary migrated northward to 40.73°N (constrained by Anguli Nuur, Haoluku, Sanyi, and Baiyangdian) (Fig. 2f and Tables 4, S2, and S4). Most of the sites within the range of the forest-steppe ecotone showed transitional vegetation types, while some sites still featured forest and temperate steppe without obvious
Journal Pre-proof
Jo u
rn
al
Pr
e-
pr
oo
f
southward or northward expansions during the late Holocene (Figs. 2e and f), which is similar to
the situation during the early Holocene. Fig. 2. Shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China during different periods of the Holocene. The grey dashed line indicates the modern range of the forest-steppe ecotone. The black gradient lines show the potential range of the forest-steppe ecotone during the Holocene (the lighter the color, the greater the uncertainty). The blue circles, black triangles, and pink squares indicate the sediment sequences with forest, forest-steppe, and steppe membership, respectively.
Journal Pre-proof Table 4 The average latitude changes in the southern and northern boundaries of the forest-steppe ecotone. Age (cal. yr BP)
Northern boundary (°N)
Southern boundary (°N)
2000–0 4000–2000 6000–4000
40.73 40.53 41.87
38.35 38.55 39.25
8000–6000 10,000–8000
41.87 41.16
39.35 39.18
12,000–10,000
41.16
39.18
oo
f
3.3 Quantitative relationships between the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone and the monsoon evolution as well as topography difference s
pr
We found a general southward shift in the forest-steppe ecotone from 12,000–8000 cal. yr BP,
e-
a northward shift from 8000–4000 cal. yr BP, and an obvious southward shift from 4000–0 cal.
Pr
yr BP (Figs. 2 and 3b), which shows a pattern that generally corresponds to the postglacial
al
monsoon evolution with a weak monsoon intensity from 12,000–10,000 cal. yr BP, a strong
rn
monsoon intensity from 10,000–6000 cal. yr BP, and a continuously weakened monsoon intensity from 6000 cal. yr BP onwards (Fig. 3a). By using the EASM index from the variability 18
Jo u
of the Sanbao cave δ O (Wang et al., 2008; Dong et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014), a correlation analys is indicates a positive relationship between the southern and northern boundaries of the forest-steppe ecotone and the intensity of the EASM (r = 0.89, p < 0.01, and r = 0.72, p < 0.01, respectively) (Figs. 3a and b). For the fossil pollen sites that still indicated forest group membership within the forest-steppe ecotone during the different periods of the Holocene, we inferred the elevations of forest from the pollen sites (Table S3; Table S4). The elevations of these sites changed from 1011 m a.s.l. to 2430 m a.s.l., with an elevation of 1550 m a.s.l., which is much higher than the average elevation of 960 m a.s.l. of all the fossil pollen sites used in this study (Table S4). Therefore, we infer that
Journal Pre-proof
the forest occurred at 1000 m a.s.l. or higher within the forest-steppe ecotone during the Holocene (Table S4). Notably, the average elevations of these sites during different periods showed a continuously increasing trend from 8000 cal. yr BP onwards (Fig. 3c), implying that the elevation pos ition suitable for forest growth has been rising, which corresponds to the weakening of the summer monsoon from the mid-late Holocene to present (r = -0.80, p < 0.01)
Jo u
rn
al
Pr
e-
pr
oo
f
(Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3 a. The EASM evolution during the Holocene, which was derived from the variability in the Sanbao cave δ 18 O (Wang et al., 2008; Dong et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014). The more negative the value is, the stronger the intensity of the summer monsoon. b. Changes of the average latitudes of the southern and northern forest-steppe ecotone boundary during the
Journal Pre-proof Holocene. c. The average elevations of the fossil pollen sites, which indicate forest group membership within the forest-steppe ecotone during different periods of the Holocene. 4
Discussion
4.1 Response of the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone to the East Asian summer monsoon The discriminant analys is in our study shows that the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone during the Holocene linearly corresponded to the evolution of the postglacial monsoon in comparison to
oo
f
the weakened summer monsoon in the mid-late Holocene (Figs. 2, 3a, and b). When the summer monsoon was strong with intensified precipitation (Liu et al., 2014), it pushed the forest-steppe
pr
ecotone northward, and vice versa. The changes in the shift of forest-steppe ecotone and the
e-
intensity of the EASM were generally consistent, suggesting a dominant role of precipitation in
Pr
determining the position of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China. The linear correspondence between the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone and the summer monsoon
rn
al
dynamics suggests that precipitation determin es the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, as also infered by other studies on the vegetation dynamics in monsoon-influenced
Jo u
eastern China (Zhao et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2018). It can be seen that the monsoon has been weakening since 6000 cal. yr BP (Fig. 3a), but the forest-steppe ecotone did not retreat southward significantly during 6000–4000 cal. yr BP (Fig. 3b), implying that the forest-steppe ecotone was initially resistant when the aridity increased. During the initial stage of the monsoon weakening, it was suggested that the pine forest replaced the broadleaf forest, so the forest type changed while the position did not change significantly (e.g., Liu et al., 2010; Liu and Yin, 2013; Hao et al., 2014). Specifically, we emphasize that the obvious wet and dry alternations in the marginal area of the EASM could not only benefit the conversion between forest and steppe but also favour the transformation between the wet-prefer
Journal Pre-proof
broadleaf forest and drought-tolerant pine forest. Therefore, there may be a conversion from broadleaf forest to pine forest during the gradual drying in the mid-late Holocene in northern China (e.g., Liu et al., 2010; Liu and Yin, 2013; Hao et al., 2014). However, the response pattern of the forest-steppe ecotone to climate change in northern China is very different from the rapid forest-to-prairie conversion in mid-continental North America, which is a direct response to
f
rapid drying during the Holocene approximately 8 ka without a conversion or stage dominated
oo
by coniferous forest (Williams et al., 2009).
pr
Our study also highlighted the influence of dry climates with very limited precipitation on the
e-
retreat of forest-steppe ecotones during the early and especially late Holocene. Although many
Pr
studies with large spatial scales have pointed out the pronounced migrations of deciduous forest-boreal forest ecotones in North America, Europe, and Asia throughout the Holocene
al
(Goldblum and Rigg, 2010), the forest distributions in China during the mid-Holocene or since
rn
the Last Glacial Maximum, and the biome migration during the Holocene (Yu et al., 1998, 2000;
Jo u
Ni et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2018), they still lack specific consideration of the retreat of the forest-steppe ecotone forced by climate drying. Some studies have indicated that modern vegetation dynamics are closely related to dry climates, for example, drought-induced migration of the forest-steppe ecotone in New Mexico in North America in the 1950s (Allen and Breshears, 1998), and tree growth declines caused by warming-induced drying in the semi-arid forests of Inner Asia since 1994 (Liu et al., 2013). Moreover, a historical study also showed that dry climates seriously threatened terrestrial vegetation in northern China during the Holocene (Yin et al., 2013). We thus deduce that the southward retreat of the forest-steppe ecotone is a response to the southward retreat of the EASM.
Journal Pre-proof
4.2 Influence of topographic factors on the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone Our pollen evidence showed that some sites located at high elevations indicate forest group membership within the forest-steppe ecotone during different periods (Fig. 2 and Table S4), implying that the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone did not completely follow the migration of EASM. The uneven response of the forest-steppe ecotone indicates the spatial changes in forests
f
might be affected by mountainous terrain differences. Topography has been suggested to have a
oo
strong impact on forest migration, as emphasized by a local case study of the forest-steppe
pr
ecotone in Anguli Nuur Lake at the southeastern margin of the Asian Gobi (Yin et al., 2013), and
e-
a regional-scale study on forest migration in northern Chinese forest-steppe ecotone (Hao et al.,
Pr
2016). Due to the overlap of mountains and the migration of forest-steppe ecotone, vertical migration of forests is suggested, different from flatlands (Cheng et al., 2018). The significant
al
terrain differences in the forest-steppe ecotone caused by the rolling mountains could provide a
rn
variety of local environments with compressed vegetation belts at different elevations, which
Jo u
may allow forest distributions when the regional climate is not suitable (Parducci et al., 2012; Yin et al., 2013; Hao et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2018). Once the climatic conditions have ameliorated, these forests could encraoch locally (Svenning et al., 2008; Pacifici et al., 2015). We also found that the elevation position suitable for forest growth has been rising from 8000 cal. yr BP onwards, corresponding to the weakening of the EASM from the mid-late Holocene to present (Figs. 3a and c, and Tables S2 and S3). Therefore, in the case of vertical forest migration in the forest-steppe ecotone, a dry climate may first push the forest lower limit to high elevations, and as the aridity increases further, the lower part of forest is then replaced by temperate steppe (Cheng et al., 2017), which is similar to the vertical biome migration in
Journal Pre-proof
response to the dry climate (Cheng et al., 2018). Therefore, we propose that the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China was three-dimensional considering the influence of topography, which mediated the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in the vertical direction. The shift of the forest-steppe ecotone may benefit from topographical differences with forests migrating to high altitudinal areas and changing to fragmented forest instead of continuous forests. Conclusions
f
5
oo
We found that the shift of the northern Chinese forest-steppe ecotone exhibited a generally
pr
consistent trend in response to the intensity of the EASM, which was characterized by southward
e-
retreat during the early Holocene from 12,000–8000 cal. yr BP, northward expansion during the
Pr
middle Holocene from 8000–4000 cal. yr BP, and southward retreat during the late Holocene from 4000–0 cal. yr BP, suggesting a dominant role of precipitation provided by the EASM in
al
determining the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone. However, some sites in mountainous regions
rn
still indicated forest group membership within the ecotone, implying possible vertical forest
Jo u
migration. We stress that EASM and topography co-determine the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, which may benefit from mountainous terrain differences when threatened by the dry climate. Therefore, the climate indication of the forest-steppe ecotone needs to be considered from three dimensions considering the future climate change.
Acknowledgements This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41901092 and 41790422), and the Key Project of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2017YFA0605101). The authors declare no competing interests.
Journal Pre-proof References Allen, C.D., Breshears, D.D., 1998. Drought-induced shift of a forest–woodland ecotone: rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95 (25), 14839–14842. Allen, C.D., M acalady, A.K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., M cDowell, N., Vennetier, M ., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D.D., Hogg, E.H., Gonzalez, P., Fensham, R., Zhang, Z., Castro, J., Demidova, N., Limp, J.-H., Allard, G., Running, S.W., Semerci, A., Cobb, N., 2010. A global overview of drought and heat -induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol. M anage. 259 (4), 660–684. Beckage, B., Osborne, B., Gavin, D.G., Pucko, C., Siccama, T., Perkins, T., 2008. A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green M ountains of Vermont. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 (11), 4197–4202. Chen, I.C., Hill, J.K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D.B., Thomas, C.D., 2011. Rapid range shifts of species associated
f
with high levels of climate warming. Science 333 (6045), 1024–1026.
oo
Cheng, Y., Liu, H.Y., Wang, H.Y., Hao, Q., 2018. Differentiated climate-driven Holocene biome migration in western and eastern China as mediated by topography. Earth Sci. Rev. 182, 174–185. Cheng, Y., Liu, H.Y., Wang, H.Y., Piao, S.L., Yin, Y., Ciais, P., Wu, X.C., Luo, Y., Zhang, C.N., Song, Y.Q., Gao,
pr
Y.S., Qiu, A.A., 2017. Contrasting effects of winter and summer climate on alpine ti mberline evolution in monsoon-dominated East Asia. Quat. Sci. Rev. 169, 278–287.
e-
Dong, J., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Hardt, B., Edwards, L., Kong, S.G., Wu, J.Y., Chen, S.T., Liu D.B., Jiang, X.Y., Zhao, K., 2010. A high-resolution stalagmite record of the Holocene East Asian monsoon from Mt
Pr
Shennongjia, central China. Holocene, 20 (2): 257–264.
Erdős, L., Ambarlı, D., Anenkhonov, O.A., Bátori, Z., Cserhalmi, D., Kiss, M ., Kröel-Dulay, G., Liu, H.Y, M agnes, M ., M olnár, Z., Naqinezhad A, Semenishchenkov Y.A., Tölgyesi, C., Török, P., 2018. The edge of
al
two worlds: A new review and synthesis on Eurasian forest ‐ steppes. Appl. Veg. Sci. 21 (3), 345–362. Goldblum, D., Rigg, L.S., 2010. The deciduous forest–boreal forest ecotone. Geogr. Compass, 4 (7), 701–717.
rn
Hao, Q., Liu, H., Liu, X., 2016. Pollen-detected altitudinal migration of forests during the Holocene in the mountainous forest–steppe ecotone in northern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 446 (2016), 70–77.
Jo u
Hao, Q., Liu, H., Yin, Y., Wang, H., Feng, M ., 2014. Varied responses of forest at its distribution margin to Holocene monsoon development in northern China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 409, 239–248. Harrison S P, Prentice C I., 2003. Climate and CO 2 controls on global vegetation distribution at the last glacial maximum: analysis based on palaeovegetation data, biome modelling and palaeoclimate simulations. Glob. Chang. Biol. 9(7): 983-1004.
Huang, J., Yu, H., Guan, X., Wang, G., Guo, R., 2016. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6 (2), 166–172. Jacobson, G., Bradshaw, R., 1981. The Selection of Sites for Paleovegetational Studies 1. Quat. Res. 16(1): 80-96. Liu, H.Y., Cui, H.T., Huang, Y.M ., 2001. Detecting Holocene movements of the woodland-steppe ecotone in northern China using discriminant analysis. J. Quat. Sci. 16 (3), 237–244. Liu, H.Y., Cui, H.T., Pott, R., Speier, M ., 1999. The surface pollen of the woodland-steppe ecotone in southeastern Inner M ongolia, China. Rev. Palaeobot. Palyno. 105 (3-4), 237–250. Liu, H.Y., Williams, A.P., Allen, C.D., Guo, D.L., Wu, X.C., Anenkhonov, O.A., Liang, E.Y., Sandanov, D.V., Yin, Y., Qi, Z.H., Badmaeva, N.K., 2013. Rapid warming accelerates tree growth decline in semi-arid forests of Inner Asia. Glob. Chang. Biol.19 (8), 2500–2510. Liu H Y, Yin Y., 2013. Response of forest distribution to past climate change: An insight into future predictions.
Journal Pre-proof Chinese Sci. Bull. 58(35), 4426–4436. Liu, H.Y., Yin, Y., Zhu, J.L., Zhao, F.J., Wang, H.Y., 2010. How did the forest respond to Holocene climate drying at the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China? Quatern. Int. 227 (1), 46–52. Liu, K.B., Lam, N.S., 1985. Paleovegetational reconstruction based on modern and fossil pollen data: an application of discriminant analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75, 115–130. Liu, Z.Y., Wen, X.Y., Brady, E.C., Otto-Bliesner, B., Yu, G., Lu, H.Y., Cheng, H., Wang, Y.J., Zheng, W.P., Ding, Y.H., Edwards, R.L., Cheng, J., Liu, W., Yang, H., 2014. Chinese cave records and the East Asia Summer M onsoon. Quat. Sci. Rev. 83, 115–128. M atthias, I., Semmler, M .S.S., Giesecke, T., 2015. Pollen diversity captures landscape structure and diversity. J. Ecol.103 (4), 880–890. M oore, P.D., Webb, J.A., Collison, M .E., 1991. Pollen Analysis. Blackwell scientific publications. Ni, J., Cao, X., Jeltsch, F., Herzschuh, U., 2014. Biome distribution over the last 22,000 yr in China. Palaeogeogr.
f
Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 409, 33–47.
oo
Pacifici, M ., Foden, W.B., Visconti, P., Watson, J.E.M ., Butchart, S.H.M ., Kovacs, K.M ., Scheffers, B.R., Hole, D.G., M artin, T.G., Akcakaya, H.R., Corlett, R.T., Huntley, B., Bickford, D., Carr, J.A., Hoffmann, A.A.,
pr
M idgley, G.F., Pearce-Kelly, P., Pearson, R.G., Williams, S.E., Willis, S.G., Young, B., Rondinini, C., 2015. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5 (3), 215–225. Parducci, L., Jorgensen, T., Tollefsrud, M .M ., Elverland, E., Alm, T., Fontana, S.L., Bennett, K.D., Haile, J.,
e-
M atetovici, I., Suyama, Y., Edwards, M .E., Andersen, K., Rasmussen, M ., Boessenkool, S., Coissac, E., Brochmann, C., Taberlet, P., Houmark-Nielsen, M ., Larsen, N.K., Orlando, L., Gilbert, M .T.P., Kjaer, K.H.,
Pr
Alsos, I.G., Willerslev, E., 2012. Glacial Survival of Boreal Trees in Northern Scandin avia. Science, 335 (6072), 1083–1086.
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C.E., Cheng, H.,
al
Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M ., Grootes, P.M ., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., M anning, S.W., Niu, M ., Reimer,
rn
R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, E.M ., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M ., van der Pcht, J., 2013. IntCal13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55 (4), 1869–
Jo u
1887.
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M ., M artin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M ., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M ., Honkaniemi, J., Lexer, M .J., Trotsiuk, V., M airota, P., Svoboda, M ., Fabrika, M ., Nagel, T.A., Reyer, C.P.O., 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim Change 7 (6), 395–402. Shi, J.F., Liu, Y., Vaganov, E.A., Li, J.B., Cai, Q.F., 2008. Statistical and process-based modeling analyses of tree growth response to climate in semi-arid area of north central China: A case study of Pinus tabulaeformis. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 113 (G1). Sugita, S. 2007a. Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation II: all you need is LO VE. The Holocene 17, 243-257. Sugita, S. 2007b. Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation I: pollen from large sites REVEALS regional vegetation composition. The Holocene 17, 229-241. Svenning, J.C., Normand, S., Skov, F., 2008. Postglacial dispersal limitation of widespread forest plant species in nemoral Europe. Ecography 31, 316–326. Wang, Y.J., Cheng, H., Edwards, R.L., Kong, X. G., Shao, X.H., Chen, S.T., Wu, J.Y., Jiang, X.Y., Wang, X.F., An, Z.S., 2008. M illennial- and orbital-scale changes in the East Asian monsoon over the past 224,000 years. Nature, 451 (7182): 1090–1093 Williams, J.W., Shuman, B., Bartlein, P.J., 2009. Rapid responses of the prairie-forest ecotone to early Holocene
Journal Pre-proof aridity in mid-continental North America. Glob. Planet. Change 66 (3-4): 195–207. Xiao, J.L., Xu, Q.H., Nakamura, T., Yang, X.L., Liang, W.D., Inouchi, Y., 2004. Holocene vegetation variation in the Daihai Lake region of north-central China: a direct indication of the Asian monsoon climatic history. Quat. Sci. Rev. 23 (14-15), 1669–1679. Xu, Q.H., Chen, F.H., Zhang, S.R., Cao, X.Y., Li, J.Y., Li, Y.C., Li, M .Y., Chen, J.H., Liu, J.B., Wang, Z.L., 2017. Vegetation succession and East Asian Summer M onsoon Changes since the last deglaciation inferred from high-resolution pollen record in Gonghai Lake, Shanxi Province, China. Holocene 27 (6), 835–846. Yin, Y., Liu, H., Liu, G., Hao, Q., Wang, H., 2013. Vegetation responses to mid-Holocene extreme drought events and subsequent long-term drought on the southeastern Inner Mongolian Plateau, China. Agr. Forest M eteorol. 178, 3–9. Yu, G., Chen, X., Ni, J., Cheddadi, R., Guiot, J., Han, H., Harrison, S.P., Huang, C., Ke, C., Kong, Z., li, S., Liew, P., Liu, G., Liu, J., Liu, Q., Liu, K.B., Prentice, I.C., Qui, W., Ren, G., Song, C., Sugita, S., Sun, X., Tang, L.,
f
van Campo, E., Xia, Y., Xu, Q., Yan, S., Yang, X., Zhao, J., Zheng, Z., 2000. Palaeovegetation of China: a
oo
pollen data-based synthesis for the mid-Holocene and last glacial maximum. J. Biofeogr. 27 (3), 635–664. Yu, G., Prentice, I.C., Harrison, S.P., Sun, X., 1998. Pollen-based biome reconstructions for China at 0 and 6000
pr
years. J. Biofeogr. 25 (6), 1055–1069.
Zhai, Q., Guo, Z., Li, Y., Li, R., 2006. Annually laminated lake sediments and environmental changes in Bashang Plateau, North China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 241, 95–102.
e-
Zhao, Y., Chen, F.H., Zhou, A.F., Yu, Z.C., Zhang, K., 2010. Vegetation history, climate change and human activities over the last 6200 years on the Liupan M ountains in the southwestern Loess Plateau in central
Pr
China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 293 (1-2), 197–205. Zhao, Y., Liu, H.Y., Li, F.R., Huang, X.Z., Sun, J.H., Zhao, W.W., Herzschuh, U., Tang, Y., 2012. Application and
1385–1392.
al
limitations of the Artemisia/Chenopodiaceae pollen ratio in arid and semi-arid China. Holocene, 22 (12),
Zhao, Y., Yu, Z., Chen, F., Zhang, J., Yang, B., 2009. Vegetation response to Holocene climate change in
Jo u
rn
monsoon-influenced region of China. Earth Sci. Rev. 97 (1), 242–256.
Journal Pre-proof
Supplementary Information for East Asian summer monsoon and topography co-determine the Holocene migration of forest-steppe ecotone in northern China Table S1 Information of the topsoil pollen samples S ite name
Latitude
Longitude
Elevation
Dominant
(°)
(°)
(m)
vegetation
Reference
1
40.13
119.43
645
Forest
This study
2
2
40.58
117.85
590
Forest
This study
3
3
40.13
119.43
865
Forest
This study
4
4
40.13
119.41
745
Forest
This study
5
5
40.13
119.43
445
Forest
This study
6
6
40.57
117.48
1450
Forest
This study
7
7
40.56
117.50
1260
Forest
This study
8
8
40.56
117.48
1350
Forest
This study
9
9
37.87
111.45
1820
Forest
This study
10
10
37.88
111.44
1860
Forest
This study
11
11
37.85
111.46
1660
Forest
This study
12
12
38.99
113.50
2245
Forest
This study
13
13
40.60
117.48
1790
Forest
This study
14
14
42.46
117.28
1520
Forest-steppe
This study
15
15
37.89
111.43
1980
Forest
This study
16
16
40.59
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn
oo
1
f
ID
1660
Forest
This study
117.23
1465
Forest-steppe
This study
37.85
111.47
1635
Forest
This study
40.56
117.48
1360
Forest
This study
40.56
117.49
1160
Forest
This study
21
37.24
113.88
960
Forest
This study
22
22
37.44
114.03
1728
Forest
This study
23
23
37.48
114.03
1564
Forest
This study
24
24
36.15
113.72
641
Forest
This study
25
25
36.17
113.75
678
Forest
This study
26
26
36.15
113.75
494
Forest
This study
27
27
40.57
117.47
1375
Forest
This study
28
28
40.56
117.49
1050
Forest
This study
29
29
37.83
114.14
680
Forest
This study
30
30
36.14
113.71
885
Forest
This study
31
31
40.59
117.47
1620
Forest
This study
32
32
37.83
114.14
500
Forest
This study
33
33
40.55
117.49
1550
Forest
This study
Jo u
117.48
42.44
Journal Pre-proof 34
36.14
113.72
743
Forest
This study
35
35
37.33
114.19
472
Forest
This study
36
36
40.51
119.30
1220
Forest
This study
37
37
40.51
119.29
920
Forest
This study
38
38
40.13
119.41
545
Forest
This study
39
39
40.52
119.29
885
Forest
This study
40
40
36.14
113.71
885
Forest
This study
41
41
38.66
105.84
2400
Steppe
This study
42
42
38.67
105.84
2305
Steppe
This study
43
43
40.56
111.51
1020
Steppe
This study
44
44
38.67
105.80
2010
Steppe
This study
45
45
37.65
107.53
1175
Steppe
This study
46
46
39.26
107.14
1360
Steppe
This study
47
47
39.11
107.95
1530
Steppe
This study
48
48
39.72
108.62
1470
Steppe
This study
49
49
39.19
105.66
1310
Steppe
This study
50
50
38.96
105.65
1490
Steppe
This study
51
51
39.43
106.78
1180
Steppe
This study
52
52
37.73
107.35
1255
Steppe
This study
53
53
37.85
106.73
1295
Steppe
This study
54
54
37.96
106.65
1270
Steppe
This study
55
55
37.71
106.89
1375
Steppe
This study
56
56
37.77
107.04
1352.5
Steppe
This study
57
57
37.51
108.87
1460
Forest-steppe
This study
58
58
40.50
107.59
1480
Steppe
This study
59
59
41.19
113
1550
Steppe
This study
60
60
37.71
107.34
1245
Steppe
This study
61
61
37.51
107.82
1300
Steppe
This study
62
62
37.41
109.26
1170
Forest-steppe
This study
63
63
38.04
114.52
2740
Forest
This study
64
64
39.75
114.82
1550
Forest
This study
65
65
37.91
111.40
1480
Forest
This study
66
66
40.60
117.90
670
Forest
This study
67
67
37.55
111.94
810
Forest
This study
68
68
39.82
114.80
1210
Forest
This study
69
69
39
112.5
1380
Forest-steppe
This study
70
70
39.06
114.74
360
Forest
This study
71
71
37.19
114.16
386
Forest
This study
72
72
37.12
114.25
228
Forest
This study
73
73
37.95
114.07
260
Forest
This study
74
74
39.41
114.76
870
Forest
This study
75
75
40.50
117.59
550
Forest
This study
76
76
37.83
114.14
590
Forest
This study
77
77
37.92
113.92
640
Forest
This study
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
34
Journal Pre-proof 78
41.59
115.49
1375
Forest-steppe
This study
79
79
42.54
117.22
1510
Forest-steppe
This study
80
80
42.51
117.24
1520
Forest-steppe
This study
81
81
38.68
105.81
2175
Steppe
This study
82
82
41.97
116.01
1390
Forest-steppe
This study
83
83
42.05
116.32
1280
Forest-steppe
This study
84
84
41.72
111.77
1450
Steppe
This study
85
85
39.85
109.67
1510
Steppe
This study
86
86
39.78
110.15
1530
Steppe
This study
87
87
41.34
112.86
1640
Steppe
This study
88
88
39.22
107.18
1330
Steppe
This study
89
89
39.15
108.02
1400
Steppe
This study
90
90
38.31
106.48
1160
Steppe
This study
91
91
39.67
108.63
1000
Steppe
This study
92
92
39.33
108.21
1455
Steppe
This study
93
93
38.19
106.57
1270
Steppe
This study
94
94
38.67
105.76
1830
Steppe
This study
95
95
38.35
105.86
1495
Steppe
This study
96
96
38.41
105.73
1570
Steppe
This study
97
97
38.38
105.96
1205
Steppe
This study
98
98
39.24
107.51
1400
Steppe
This study
99
99
39.18
107.93
1550
Steppe
This study
100
100
39.61
108.54
1450
Steppe
This study
101
101
38.93
105.65
1505
Steppe
This study
102
102
39.35
106.96
1270
Steppe
This study
103
103
39.36
105.85
1260
Steppe
This study
104
104
39.24
106.85
1690
Steppe
This study
105
105
38.47
105.68
1390
Steppe
This study
106
106
38.63
105.63
1400
Steppe
This study
107
107
38.37
105.96
1200
Steppe
This study
108
108
39.42
106.83
1200
Steppe
This study
109
109
42.62
116.12
1374
Forest-steppe
This study
110
110
42.37
116.07
1310
Forest-steppe
This study
111
111
42.51
116.09
1441
Forest-steppe
This study
112
112
42.38
116.20
1314
Forest-steppe
This study
113
113
42.27
116.34
1450
Forest-steppe
This study
114
114
42.29
116.45
1281
Forest-steppe
This study
115
115
42.25
116.63
1279
Forest-steppe
This study
116
116
42.19
116.69
1272
Forest-steppe
This study
117
117
42.15
116.89
1300
Forest-steppe
This study
118
118
42.17
116.99
1262
Forest-steppe
This study
119
119
42.25
117.08
1336
Forest-steppe
This study
120
120
42.50
117.29
1565
Forest-steppe
This study
121
121
42.23
116.47
1257
Forest-steppe
This study
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
78
Journal Pre-proof 122
42.17
116.41
1295
Forest-steppe
This study
123
123
42.09
116.46
1320
Forest-steppe
This study
124
124
41.96
116.17
1443
Forest-steppe
This study
125
125
41.83
116.09
1489
Forest-steppe
This study
126
126
41.70
116.12
1518
Forest-steppe
This study
127
127
41.74
116.01
1462
Forest-steppe
This study
128
128
41.75
115.95
1452
Forest-steppe
This study
129
129
41.52
115.31
1447
Forest-steppe
This study
130
130
41.62
115.21
1405
Steppe
This study
131
131
41.38
114.93
1378
Steppe
This study
132
132
41.33
114.57
1364
Steppe
This study
133
133
41.29
114.38
1339
Steppe
This study
134
134
41.45
114.41
1367
Steppe
This study
135
135
41.60
114.59
1427
Steppe
This study
136
136
43.57
115.04
1066
Steppe
This study
137
137
43.75
114.75
1137
Steppe
This study
138
138
43.93
114.83
1157
Steppe
This study
139
139
43.95
114.70
1128
Steppe
This study
140
140
43.90
114.68
1011
Steppe
This study
141
141
43.91
113.64
1035
Steppe
This study
142
142
43.82
113.63
1082
Steppe
This study
143
143
43.63
113.39
1043
Steppe
This study
144
144
43.47
113.15
1048
Steppe
This study
145
145
43.25
113
1038
Steppe
This study
146
146
42
112.48
1098
Steppe
This study
147
147
42.60
112.61
1163
Steppe
This study
148
148
42.85
112.58
1112
Steppe
This study
149
149
42.90
112.73
1117
Steppe
This study
150
150
43.78
113.70
1161
Steppe
This study
151
151
43.69
113.82
1148
Steppe
This study
152
152
43.51
114.17
1094
Steppe
This study
153
153
43.28
114.33
1066
Steppe
This study
154
154
43.17
114.46
1072
Steppe
This study
155
155
43.02
114.48
1113
Steppe
This study
156
156
42.96
114.34
1072
Steppe
This study
157
157
42.94
114.39
1080
Steppe
This study
158
158
42.83
114.54
1146
Steppe
This study
159
159
42.74
114.65
1159
Steppe
This study
160
160
42.19
115.41
1224
Forest-steppe
This study
161
161
42.37
115.66
1363
Forest-steppe
This study
162
162
42.58
115.42
1279
Forest-steppe
This study
163
163
42.62
115.17
1265
Steppe
This study
164
164
42.66
114.93
1186
Steppe
This study
165
165
42.64
114.81
1148
Steppe
This study
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
122
Journal Pre-proof 166
42.51
114.81
1207
Steppe
This study
167
167
42.28
114.87
1306
Steppe
This study
168
168
42.4
114.68
1249
Steppe
This study
169
169
42.43
114.48
1285
Steppe
This study
170
170
42.55
114.24
1138
Steppe
This study
171
171
42.56
114.07
1082
Steppe
This study
172
172
42.47
114.03
1190
Steppe
This study
173
173
42.40
113.98
1240
Steppe
This study
174
174
42.33
113.93
1311
Steppe
This study
175
175
42.25
114.01
1300
Steppe
This study
176
176
42.12
113.87
1461
Steppe
This study
177
177
42.02
114.23
1116
Steppe
This study
178
178
42.13
114.56
1345
Steppe
This study
179
179
42.07
114.57
1416
Steppe
This study
180
180
41.94
114.51
1490
Steppe
This study
181
181
41.84
114.69
1461
Steppe
This study
182
182
41.85
114.92
1484
Steppe
This study
183
183
42.19
115.57
1330
Forest-steppe
This study
184
184
42.11
115.50
1406
Forest-steppe
This study
185
185
41.85
115.27
1483
Forest-steppe
This study
186
186
41.75
115.17
1443
Steppe
This study
187
187
41.64
115.02
1407
Steppe
This study
188
188
41.57
111.63
1464
Steppe
This study
189
189
41.64
111.45
1464
Steppe
This study
190
190
41.75
111.32
1529
Steppe
This study
191
191
41.88
111.20
1485
Steppe
This study
192
192
42.13
111.01
1194
Steppe
This study
193
193
42.27
110.95
1179
Steppe
This study
194
194
42.65
111.95
1003
Steppe
This study
195
195
42.75
110.75
968
Steppe
This study
196
196
42.75
110.57
1024
Steppe
This study
197
197
42.66
110.47
1053
Steppe
This study
198
198
42.92
110.81
1031
Steppe
This study
199
199
43.16
111.20
1160
Steppe
This study
200
200
43.15
111.36
1053
Steppe
This study
201
201
43.25
111.47
1057
Steppe
This study
202
202
43.35
111.59
965
Steppe
This study
203
203
43.52
112.08
984
Steppe
This study
204
204
43.20
111.82
1057
Steppe
This study
205
205
42.92
111.86
1124
Steppe
This study
206
206
42.80
112.15
1160
Steppe
This study
207
207
42.76
112.43
1099
Steppe
This study
208
208
42.72
112.58
1120
Steppe
This study
209
209
43.06
112.46
1085
Steppe
This study
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
166
Journal Pre-proof 210
43.23
112.34
1022
Steppe
This study
211
211
43.35
112.17
1033
Steppe
This study
212
212
42.48
112.50
1239
Steppe
This study
213
213
42.34
112.37
1235
Steppe
This study
214
214
42.21
112.27
1287
Steppe
This study
215
215
42.40
117.24
1560
Forest-steppe
This study
216
216
42.82
116.79
1350
Forest-steppe
This study
217
217
42.97
116.79
1350
Forest-steppe
This study
218
218
42.96
116.76
1322
Forest-steppe
This study
219
219
42.92
116.77
1320
Forest-steppe
This study
220
220
42.78
116.96
1390
Forest-steppe
This study
221
221
42.74
116.92
1390
Forest-steppe
This study
222
222
42.60
116.99
1500
Forest-steppe
This study
223
223
42.59
117.05
1470
Forest-steppe
This study
224
224
42.59
117.14
1554
Forest-steppe
This study
225
225
42.58
117.33
1570
Forest-steppe
This study
226
226
42.31
117.50
1450
Forest-steppe
This study
227
227
42.77
116.91
1280
Forest-steppe
This study
228
228
43.67
116.82
1390
Forest-steppe
This study
229
229
43.55
116.68
1210
Forest-steppe
This study
230
230
43.50
116.70
1300
Forest-steppe
This study
231
231
43.24
116.39
1300
Forest-steppe
This study
232
232
43.08
116.71
1258
Forest-steppe
This study
233
233
43.09
116.60
1400
Forest-steppe
This study
234
234
42.89
116.72
1345
Forest-steppe
This study
235
235
42.79
116.70
1400
Forest-steppe
This study
236
236
42.67
116.68
1416
Forest-steppe
This study
237
237
42.70
116.61
1395
Forest-steppe
This study
238
238
42.76
116.56
1365
Forest-steppe
This study
239
239
42.86
116.40
1350
Forest-steppe
This study
240
240
42.91
116.62
1370
Forest-steppe
This study
241
241
42.88
116.67
1410
Forest-steppe
This study
242
242
42.05
117.09
1370
Forest-steppe
This study
243
243
42.98
117.18
1130
Forest-steppe
This study
244
244
42.96
117.30
1220
Forest-steppe
This study
245
245
42.66
116.89
1415
Forest-steppe
This study
246
246
42.66
116.80
1450
Forest-steppe
This study
247
247
42.48
117.05
1475
Forest-steppe
This study
248
248
42.30
117.06
1430
Forest-steppe
This study
249
249
41.33
114.32
1357
Steppe
This study
250
250
41.22
114.32
1497
Steppe
This study
251
251
41.26
114.35
1392
Steppe
This study
252
252
41.31
114.35
1321
Steppe
This study
253
253
41.20
114.39
1435
Steppe
This study
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
210
Journal Pre-proof 254
41.31
114.39
1326
Steppe
This study
255
255
39.37
107.09
1408
Steppe
This study
256
256
39.26
107.14
1325
Steppe
This study
257
257
39.24
107.81
1359
Steppe
This study
258
258
39.20
108.04
1362
Steppe
This study
259
259
39.31
108.10
1399
Steppe
This study
260
260
39.73
108.63
1419
Steppe
This study
261
261
38.86
108.39
1403
Steppe
This study
262
262
38.78
108.52
1360
Steppe
This study
263
263
38.64
108.68
1367
Steppe
This study
264
264
38.53
108.81
1323
Steppe
This study
265
265
38.36
108.66
1294
Steppe
This study
266
266
38.03
108.61
1233
Steppe
This study
267
267
38.85
109.15
1304
Steppe
This study
268
268
39.06
109.10
1316
Steppe
This study
269
269
39.05
109.47
1318
Forest-steppe
This study
270
270
39.09
109.63
1315
Forest-steppe
This study
271
271
39.29
109.82
1400
Forest-steppe
This study
272
272
39.06
110.15
1238
Forest-steppe
This study
273
273
39.06
110.32
1111
Forest-steppe
This study
274
274
38.81
110.36
1131
Forest-steppe
This study
275
275
38.78
110.23
1248
Forest-steppe
This study
276
276
38.67
110.04
1193
Forest-steppe
This study
277
277
38.64
110.01
1192
Forest-steppe
This study
278
278
38.53
109.86
1275
Forest-steppe
This study
279
279
38.44
109.73
1156
Forest-steppe
This study
280
280
38.03
109.65
1006
Forest-steppe
This study
281
281
38.07
109.45
994
Forest-steppe
This study
282
282
37.97
109.28
1050
Forest-steppe
This study
283
283
37.66
109.14
1130
Forest-steppe
This study
284
284
37.58
108.68
1378
Forest-steppe
This study
285
285
37.53
108.40
1383
Forest-steppe
This study
286
286
37.50
108.28
1440
Forest-steppe
This study
287
287
37.65
108.32
1365
Steppe
This study
288
288
37.73
108.26
1329
Steppe
This study
289
289
37.73
108.31
1324
Steppe
This study
290
290
37.84
108.05
1358
Steppe
This study
291
291
37.93
107.97
1377
Steppe
This study
292
292
37.99
107.85
1373
Steppe
This study
293
293
38.07
107.68
1369
Steppe
This study
294
294
38.25
107.41
1355
Steppe
This study
295
295
38.32
107.32
1493
Steppe
This study
296
296
38.40
107.26
1465
Steppe
This study
297
297
38.08
107.40
1360
Steppe
This study
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
254
Journal Pre-proof 298
38.01
107.47
1301
Steppe
This study
299
299
37.99
107.38
1347
Steppe
This study
300
300
37.95
107.38
1334
Steppe
This study
301
301
42.36
116.18
1375
Forest-steppe
This study
302
302
42.55
112.48
996
Steppe
This study
303
303
43.78
111.78
966
Steppe
This study
304
304
43.76
111.63
969
Steppe
This study
305
305
43.71
111.54
1001
Steppe
This study
306
306
43.77
111.83
959
Steppe
This study
307
307
43.83
111.66
981
Steppe
This study
308
308
43.79
111.77
945
Steppe
This study
309
309
43.75
111.87
975
Steppe
This study
310
310
43.82
111.61
975
Steppe
This study
311
311
43.84
111.51
931
Steppe
This study
312
312
43.89
111.41
1007
Steppe
This study
313
313
43.91
111.39
1012
Steppe
This study
314
314
43.92
111.49
1013
Steppe
This study
315
315
43.87
111.58
957
Steppe
This study
316
Sanjiaocheng
39
103.33
1712
Steppe
Chen et al., 2006
317
Zhuyeze
39.05
103.67
1790
Steppe
Li et al., 2011
318
Qingtu Lake
39.07
103.61
1745
Steppe
Zhao et al., 2008
319
Daihai
40.55
112.66
1496
Forest-steppe
Xiao et al., 2004
320
Dadiwan
36.27
106.37
1605
Forest-steppe
Xia et al., 1998
321
Guangrunpo
36.02
114.53
66
Forest
Zhang et al., 2007
322
Qigai
39.37
109.39
1087
Steppe
Sun et al., 2013
323
Tenggeernuur
40.47
110.67
1570
Steppe
Zhao et al., 2001
324
Tianchi lake
35.26
106.31
1756
Forest
Zhao et al., 2010
325
Pi1
42.44
117.27
1538
Forest-steppe
Xu et al., 2005
326
Pi2
42.40
117.30
1463
Forest-steppe
Xu et al., 2005
327
Pi3
40.13
119.43
567
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
328
Pi4
40.58
117.85
884
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
329
Pi5
40.88
111.58
1342
Steppe
Xu et al., 2005
330
Ph2
40.13
119.43
558
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
331
Ph3
40.13
119.41
492
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
332
Ph4
40.13
119.43
566
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
333
Ph6
40.57
117.48
918
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
334
Ph7
40.56
117.50
959
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
335
Ph8
40.56
117.48
911
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
336
Pa3
37.87
111.45
1689
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
337
Pa4
37.87
111.45
1616
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
338
Pa5
37.88
111.44
1559
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
339
Pa6
42.40
117.27
1492
Forest-steppe
Xu et al., 2005
340
La1
37.85
111.46
1661
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
341
La4
40.60
117.48
1040
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn
Jo u
f
298
Journal Pre-proof La5
42.46
117.28
1488
Forest-steppe
Xu et al., 2005
343
Be1
37.89
111.43
1690
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
344
Be2
40.59
117.48
1007
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
345
Be3
42.44
117.23
1394
Forest-steppe
Xu et al., 2005
346
Qu1
37.85
111.47
1645
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
347
Qu2
40.56
117.48
911
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
348
Qu3
40.56
117.48
918
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
349
Qu4
40.56
117.49
947
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
350
Qu5
37.24
113.88
368
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
351
Qu6
37.44
114.03
467
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
352
Qu7
37.48
114.03
610
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
353
Qu8
37.48
114.03
610
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
354
Qu9
37.44
114.03
467
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
355
Qu10
36.15
113.72
1521
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
356
Qu11
36.17
113.75
1628
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
357
Qu12
36.17
113.75
1628
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
358
Qu13
36.15
113.75
1431
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
359
Ja1
40.57
117.47
936
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
360
Ja2
40.56
117.49
947
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
361
Ca1
37.83
114.14
492
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
362
Ca2
36.14
113.71
1549
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
363
Ca3
36.14
113.71
1549
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
364
Po1
40.59
117.47
1007
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
365
Po2
40.59
117.47
1007
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
366
Pt1
37.83
114.14
492
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
367
Bh1
40.55
117.49
876
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
368
Bh2
40.55
117.49
940
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
369
Bh3
36.14
113.72
1549
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
370
Bh4
37.33
114.19
144
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
371
Bh5
40.52
119.29
597
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
372
Bh6
40.51
119.30
610
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
373
Bh7
40.52
119.28
591
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
374
Bh8
40.52
119.29
591
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
375
Bh9
40.51
119.29
588
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
376
Bh10
40.13
119.41
487
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
377
Bh11
40.52
119.29
597
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
378
Bh12
36.14
113.71
1505
Forest
Xu et al., 2005
379
Pa2
38.67
105.84
1050
Steppe
Xu et al., 2005
380
Po4
40.56
111.51
1480
Steppe
Xu et al., 2005
381
Ul2
38.67
105.80
1046
Steppe
Xu et al., 2005
382
El1
37.65
107.53
1364
Steppe
Xu et al., 2005
383
El2
37.65
107.53
1364
Steppe
Xu et al., 2005
oo
pr
e-
Pr
al
rn Jo u
f
342
Journal Pre-proof
Table S2 Information of the fossil pollen sites Latitude (°)
Longitude (°)
Elevation (m)
M AP (mm)
M AT (℃)
Age range (cal. ya BP)
Dominant modern vegetation
Reference
Qingtu Lake
39.05 39.07
103.67 103.61
1312 1310
105.3 108.4
7.7 7.7
11000–0 7200–0
Steppe Steppe
Li et al., 2011 Zhao et al., 2008
3
Gaoximage
42.95
115.37
1243
306.7
0.9
5735–0
4 5
Hamatai Salty Lake Huangjiabao
38.72
108.75
1342
333.2
6.5
7283–0
40.57
115.15
601
347.2
5.7
14000–0 (a BP)
6
Diaojiaohaizi
41.12
112.57
2038
353
0
13281–0
7
Anguli Nuur
41.33
114.36
1311
369.5
2.6
11306–0
8
Qiguoshan
42.28
118.97
565
370.9
4.6
9
Chasuqi
40.67
111.13
1011
372.6
10
Taipusi
41.98
115.18
1491
382.4
11
Bayanchagan
12
Haoluku
41.65 42.96
115.21 116.76
1370 1309
385.4 386.4
13
Daihai
40.55
112.66
1290
386.5
Liuzhouwan Xipu
42.71
116.76
1391
40.12
114.22
920
16
Yujiagou
40.15
114.48
17
Shandian River
42.22
116.62
18
S anyi
43.62
117.38
19
Xiaoniuchang
42.62
116.82
20
S ujiawan
35.54
104.52
21
Jiangjunpaozi
22
Charisu
42.37 42.95
23
Wangxianggou
24 25
Gonghai Lake Niangziguan
26
M aili
ID
Site name
1
Zhuyeze
2
14 15
Li et al., 2003
Steppe
Wang et al., 1996
Forest
Sun et al., 2001
Steppe
Yang, 2001
Steppe
Yin et al., 2013
8400–0 (a BP) 10136–0
Forest-steppe
Xu et al., 2002
Steppe
Wang et al., 1999
10758–0 12346–0 12023–0
Forest-steppe
Huang et al., 2005
1.6 -0.7
Steppe Forest-steppe
Jiang et al., 2006 Liu et al., 2001
-p
e r P 6.4 1.6
ro
5.1
14000–0 (a BP)
Steppe
Li et al., 2004
389.7
-0.2
16000–0
Forest-steppe
Liu et al., 2001
391
6.6
16000–0 (a BP)
Forest-steppe
Wang et al., 2003
393
6.4
15000–0
Forest-steppe
Xia et al., 2001
rn
u o 855
al
f o Steppe
394.8
0.4
9100–0
Forest-steppe
Wang et al., 2006
1473
396.9
-1.7
Wang et al., 2005
1411
402.1
-0.3
19742–0 15731–0
Forest-steppe Forest-steppe
Liu et al., 2001
1958
415.8
5.9
15100–0
Forest-steppe
Feng et al., 2006
117.47 122.35
1567 250
430.5 431.3
-0.2 6.7
14150–0 4970–0
Forest-steppe Forest-steppe
Liu et al., 2001 Li et al., 2003
42.07
119.92
735
441.3
4.1
5370–0
Forest-steppe
Li et al., 2006
38.90
112.23
1860
468
4-8
14700–0
Forest
Xu et al., 2016
37.95
113.88
794
504.2
11.8
15000–0
Forest
Yang et al., 1999
42.87
122.88
162
516.3
6.9
3800–0
Forest-steppe
Ren, 1999
J
1261
Journal Pre-proof
Huanghua
38.35
117.35
7
525.3
12.1
28954–0
Forest
Guang et al., 2000
Dadiwan Baiyangdian
35.02
105.90
1459
540.8
8.2
11190–0 (a BP)
Forest
An et al., 2003
38.40
115.98
14
551.7
12.4
13233–0
Forest
Xu et al., 1988
30
Jingbo Lake
43.92
128.83
348
557.6
2.9
9560–0
Forest
Li, C. et al., 2011
31
Chadianpo
36.10
114.40
68
585
13.7
9560–0
Forest
Zhang et al., 2007
32
Wangjiadian
36.10
114.40
64
585
13.7
12000–0
Forest
33
Liupan M ountain
35.26
106.31
2430
615
3.4
6200–0
Forest
Zhao et al., 2010
34
Cangumiao
39.96
118.61
73
638.3
10.1
5259–0
Forest
Xu et al., 2004
35
M aohebei
36
Yanshengang
39.50 39.87
119.17 118.87
1 58
647 656.9
10.7 10.5
7151–0 15000–0
f o
Cao et al., 2010
Forest Forest
Li and Liang, 1985 Kong et al., 2000
37
Jinchuan
42.35
126.38
620
762.4
3.2
10800–0
Forest
Jiang et al., 2008
38 39
Changbai M ountain Xiaolongwan
42.28
126.60
797
775
2.5
11650–0
Forest
Stebich et al., 2015
42.30
126.36
655
760
5350–0 (a BP)
Forest
Xu et al., 2014
27 28 29
e
r P 3.2
o r p
*Bold and underlined sites were used for boundary constraint and statistical analyses, corresponding to their distribution in Figure 2 and Table 4.
l a n
J
r u o
Journal Pre-proof Table S3 The average elevations of the fossil pollen sites with forest group membership in the forest-steppe ecotone. Average elevation (m a.s.l.)
2000–0 4000–2000 6000–4000
1894 1587 1452
8000–6000 10,000–8000
1438 1331
12,000–10,000
1331
oo
f
Age (cal. yr BP)
Table S4 Predicted vegetation membership based on the fossil pollen sites during the Holocene Longitu
Elevatio
(°)
de (°)
n (m)
Age (cal. yr BP)
2000–0
4000–
6000–
8000–
10,000–
12,000–
2000
4000
6000
8000
10,000
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
pr
Latitude
39.05
103.67
1312
3
2
39.07
103.61
1310
3
3
42.95
115.37
1243
3
4
38.72
108.75
1342
1
1
1
1
0
0
5
40.57
115.15
601
2
2
0
0
0
0
6
41.12
112.57
2038
1
1
1
1
2
2
7
41.33
114.36
1311
2
1
1
1
1
1
8
42.28
118.97
565
2
2
2
1
1
1
9
40.67
111.13
10
41.98
115.18
11
41.65
12
42.96
13
40.55
14
42.71
15
1011
1
1
1
1
2
2
1491
2
2
2
2
2
2
Jo u
rn
Pr
e-
1
al
ID
115.21
1370
3
3
2
2
2
2
116.76
1309
2
2
2
2
2
2
112.66
1290
1
1
1
1
1
1
116.76
1391
1
1
1
1
1
1
40.12
114.22
920
2
2
0
0
0
0
16
40.15
114.48
855
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
42.22
116.62
1261
3
1
1
1
2
2
18
43.62
117.38
1473
2
2
2
2
3
3
19
42.62
116.82
1411
2
2
2
2
2
2
20
35.54
104.52
1958
1
1
2
2
1
1
21
42.37
117.47
1567
0
1
1
2
2
2
22
42.95
122.35
250
1
1
1
0
0
0
23
42.07
119.92
735
2
2
2
0
0
0
24
38.9
112.23
1860
1
1
1
1
1
1
25
37.95
113.88
794
2
3
1
1
1
1
26
42.87
122.88
162
1
1
0
0
0
0
Journal Pre-proof 38.35
117.35
7
2
1
1
1
2
2
28
35.02
105.9
1459
2
2
1
1
1
1
29
38.4
115.98
14
1
1
1
1
1
1
30
43.92
128.83
348
1
1
1
1
1
1
31
36.1
114.4
68
1
1
1
1
0
0
32
36.1
114.4
64
3
1
1
1
1
1
33
35.26
106.31
2430
1
1
1
1
0
0
34
39.96
118.61
73
1
1
1
0
0
0
35
39.5
119.17
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
36
39.87
118.87
58
3
1
1
1
1
1
37
42.35
126.38
620
1
1
1
1
1
1
38
42.28
126.6
797
1
1
1
1
1
1
39
42.3
126.36
655
1
1
1
0
0
0
f
27
oo
*The number 1 represents the forest, 2 represents the forest-steppe ecotone, 3 represents the steppe, as well as 0 indicates the vacancy value
pr
*Bold, black, and italic number 1 represents the forest group membership within the forest –steppe ecotone during different periods of the Holocene.
*The mean elevation of all the fossil pollen sites in this study is 960 m.
e-
*The average elevation of the fossil pollen sites showing forest group membership within the forest –steppe
Jo u
rn
al
Pr
ecotone is 1550 m.
Journal Pre-proof Highlights We stress that East Asian summer monsoon and topography co-determine the shift of the forest-steppe ecotone in northern China, and mountainous terrain differences also benefit the vertical forest migrations when threatened by the dry climate. The climate indication of the
Jo u
rn
al
Pr
e-
pr
oo
f
forest-steppe ecotone needs to be considered from three dimensions.
Journal Pre-proof
Jo u
rn
al
Pr
e-
pr
oo
f
The authors declare no conflicts of interesting.