Education or training?

EDITORIAL

of

EDUCATION OR TRAINING? .\

recent

article

differences

by Whitehorn

between

reference

training

“‘Stand

back,

I’m

(1984)

on

the

and education,

to resuscitation,

ended

with

nurse”

~ sighs

back,

doesn’t Why,

referred

One

I’m

sound

does

an

educated

the same

I thought,

to be

is there ask

there

t>ducatrd

doctor

in

the

house.

measure

of how

far

we

still

when

as being just

the

either

plain

can

almost

\tas

to be confused beings

what

their they

tc-ach one

any

implies

without

can having

any

must

many

real

surely

not

different this all

is

eyes

to distinguish

nurses

As a profession grades to that

of

article

nurses

(trained) but

of being

to

that

this to be skills

it is desirable

into

what

It

certainly

be taught they

skills

they

twentieth

century. nurses

standard

without

be of limited

seem

the

between

one

we have a

mix

bottom

might level

initially

educating

nurse

discussion Board. lem

same. grade perhaps of

the It

is

nurses

the

would

of education way

to do this to a high

liew

thr

Royal

on

the

be available.

towards

to tackle fi)r the

College future

as may

the English

propose

at

Some

time will tell.

this,

from

education

numbers

Only

Have

those

wider.

to us all in the

hopefully

and

One

is not

about.

National the

proI)-

fi1tur.t’ will

nursing

of’ the

1~

prot&sicln

also to the public.

and too grades

Reference Whitrhorn K Is thrrr Observer December

a profession.

We cannot blame the public at large. profession we have accepted that a great

of educating

of interest and

will they

reward

and

document

document How

of

a long-term

you read new

education

is in

proud

small

the majority.

it would minimum This

to raise standards

with

of Nursing’s

better

the contribution

top

in general.

be to educate

of the of the

assistants/auxiliaries.

to be getting

nurses

be

desirable

some

of training the

to

education part

so little

be very

at

for a need

of

In

for

in terms

seems

have

education!

nursing

those

in

of understanding

and

left too far behind?

are,

dilemma.

much

to belittle

nurse

quarter

reached

of re-

with

a

last

they

value

There

levels our

un-

the

we need

gap

in

training.

of nurse

something The

the

1 concluded

would

How

contribution been

do

contend,

had

intended

By the time

The

any

Their

no

it represents in

untrained

among

skills without are doing.

this

of training

no way

at have,

immediate

to

a feature would

be

argue

seems

I

my

this

not

of nursing

if all

or

reflection.

nevertheless,

reality

of

are

or

Not,

to

some-

has

further

as being

between

Doubtless,

as resuscitating

-

was

understanding

judgments.

public’s

inimical

Why

various

Whether

and

difficult many

any

of what

reasoned

perhaps

anoth(.r.

taught

nurses

of facts

ticxrstanding

and

nurses

education;

be

matter.

that

ac.quisition

c oursc.

it is a

to label

of task with

such

another

undesirable

of

or

to go as a

be taught

insight

any understanding

tc’rms

today. feature;

Surely

understanding.

skills

without is

‘what it

cart who

little

appeared,

On

like

for nurses trained

have

has

sort

are doing.

people

doing

was

i.e.

in this issue on the training

assistants

action that

care,

by people

received

the article

educated?

or educated.

p~~rfortn

humall

a

of Whitehorn’s

an individual not

When

accepted

‘nurse’?

educated

instances,

the

‘The implication that

public

trained

or

is

-

does it?’

need

trained

if

nurse”

somehow any

as either

not

profession

most

nursing

will be given

education?’

of relief. “Stand

basic

nursing

as follows:

a trained

the

bedside,

As a deal

a trained 30th: 7

nurw

in ~hr hcmc.

‘l‘ht

George J McKenzie 93