Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard

Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard

Accepted Manuscript Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyar...

438KB Sizes 1 Downloads 64 Views

Accepted Manuscript Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboa, Teresa Garde-Cerdán, Ana Gonzalo-Diago, Yerko Moreno-Simunovic, Ana M. Martínez-Gil PII:

S0023-6438(16)30525-4

DOI:

10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.039

Reference:

YFSTL 5688

To appear in:

LWT - Food Science and Technology

Received Date: 24 February 2016 Revised Date:

8 August 2016

Accepted Date: 18 August 2016

Please cite this article as: Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G., Garde-Cerdán, T., Gonzalo-Diago, A., MorenoSimunovic, Y., Martínez-Gil, A.M., Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard, LWT - Food Science and Technology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.039. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and

2

glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard

3 4

Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboaa, Teresa Garde-Cerdánb, Ana Gonzalo-Diagob, Yerko

5

Moreno-Simunovica,*, Ana M. Martínez-Gila,* a

Centro Tecnológico de la Vid y el Vino, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Talca, Av. Lircay S/N, Talca, Chile. Tel: +56967676307. *e-mail: [email protected];

7

[email protected]

8

11 12

Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (Gobierno de La Rioja-CSIC-Universidad de La Rioja). Carretera de Burgos Km. 6. Finca La Grajera. 26007 Logroño, Spain

SC

10

b

Abstract

M AN U

9

RI PT

6

The effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acid and

14

glutathione composition in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard was studied. Nitrogen

15

treatments applied to the grapevines were urea (Ur), urea plus sulphur (Ur+S) and

16

arginine (Arg). Also, two commercial nitrogen complexes, Basfoliar Algae (BA) and

17

Nutrimyr Thiols (NT), were used. For each treatment, 2 kg N/ha was applied, divided in

18

two applications. The commercial nitrogen complexes (NT and BA) improved the

19

amino acid content. Ur+S treatment had a better assimilation than Ur, increasing the

20

amino acid composition. Arg treatment did not increase the content of any amino acid,

21

however increased the easily extractable anthocyanins, total anthocyanins and total

22

polyphenol index. Organic sources treatments (Arg, NT and BA) increased glutathione

23

concentration. These results can be of oenological interest to improve grape quality

24

enhancing must amino acid and glutathione content in high proline accumulator variety.

25 26

Keywords: amino acids, glutathione, foliar application, vineyard, must, Cabernet

27

Sauvignon

AC C

EP

TE D

13

28 29

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 30

1. Introduction Cabernet Sauvignon is one of the most important varieties cultivated in Chile

32

accounting for almost 32 % of the area planted with wine grapes. It was introduced to

33

the country from Bordeaux along with other varieties around 1851, before the

34

phylloxera crisis (Hernandez, 1997). The raise of temperatures and decrease of

35

precipitations due to climate change in certain areas of the country, has led to a change

36

in the organoleptic profile of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes, so maintaining/improving

37

grape quality potential is an important challenge for the Chilean wine production. In this

38

context, Acevedo-Opazo, Ortega-Farias, and Moreno (2004) studied the effect of

39

different irrigation treatments in Cabernet Sauvignon grape quality, yield and vegetative

40

balance. The results showed that replacing 40 and 70 % of vine evapotranspiration is

41

possible to reduce water consumption, maintaining yield and grape composition. Also,

42

Peña-Neira et al. (2004) studied the phenolic compounds in skins and seeds during

43

ripening of low, medium and high vigor vines, showing that vigor alters the

44

concentration of all phenolic compounds. However, none of these studies considered the

45

potential changes in grape amino acid composition on Cabernet Sauvignon variety.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

31

Amino acids together with ammonium ion play an essential role as nitrogen

47

sources for yeast and lactic acid bacteria, responsible for alcoholic and malolactic

48

fermentations, respectively (Garde-Cerdán et al., 2009; Moreno-Arribas & Polo, 2009).

49

Thus, must nitrogen concentration affects yeast and bacteria growth and fermentation

50

processes, being involved indirectly in the final quality of wine (Arias-Gil, Garde-

51

Cerdán, & Ancín-Azpilicueta, 2007; Garde-Cerdán & Ancín-Azpilicueta, 2008; Carrau,

52

Medina, Farina, Boido, & Dellacasa, 2010; Garde-Cerdán et al., 2011; Martínez-Gil et

53

al., 2012). A good parameter to estimate must fermentability is the concentration of

54

amino acids in the must (Löhnertz, Prior, Bleser, & Linsenmeier, 1998). A traditional

AC C

EP

46

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT way to increase N must content has been soil N fertilization as reported by Conradie

56

(2001) and Linsenmeir, Loos, and Löhnertz (2008) who studied the effects of N soil

57

application on grape amino acid composition. Another strategy is to increase N vine

58

status by means of foliar N applications, an interesting technique because of the quick

59

and efficient assimilation of applied products by plants (Lasa et al., 2012). Previous

60

studies have shown that urea foliar application affects grape and wine composition

61

(Ancín-Azpilicueta, Nieto-Rojo, & Gómez-Cordón, 2013; Lasa et al., 2012; Garde-

62

Cerdán et al., 2014). In recent years, new commercial nitrogen fertilizers, whose

63

composition includes amino acids with nutritional purposes, are emerging on the

64

market. Some of the products used to improve the quality of grapes through foliar

65

applications are Basfoliar Algae and Nutrimyr Thiols. The first one is a concentrated

66

extract of Chilean natural algae (Durvillaea antarctica) that could stimulate the

67

synthesis of different compounds on grapes. For its part, Nutrimyr Thiols is a foliar

68

fertilizer which is sold as a wine flavor enhancer. So, it is interesting to study the effect

69

that foliar commercial products have on the grape quality.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

55

However, only a single publication has studied the effect of foliar vineyard

71

application of amino acids on must amino acid content. In this study, phenylalanine

72

foliar applications improved Tempranillo must amino acid content, however the use of

73

proline had no effect (Garde-Cerdán et al., 2014). To our knowledge this is the first

74

report regarding the use of arginine as a new fertilizer. Of all amino acids that may be

75

present in grape juice, proline and arginine are those found in highest amounts (Bell &

76

Henschke, 2005). To study the vine´s response to arginine foliar application turns out to

77

be interesting because this is one of the most abundant amino acid in grape musts, being

78

an important yeast nitrogen source. Another interesting molecule composed by three

79

different amino acids, cysteine, glutamic acid and glycine is the glutathione. The

AC C

EP

70

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT function of this tripeptide in winemaking has been recently discussed and reviewed by

81

Kritzinger, Bauer, and du Toit (2013). This molecule acts as an antioxidant, preventing

82

the appearance of browning pigments in musts and protecting anthocyanins from

83

oxidation (Gambuti, Han, Peterson, & Waterhouse, 2015). Glutathione also exerts a

84

protective effect in wine volatile compounds (Ugliano et al., 2011) but until now, there

85

were no studies in the literature reporting the effects of foliar N application on the

86

content of glutathione in grapes. Thus, there is already a lack of information relating to

87

the impact of nitrogen application, and more concretely, amino acid application in the

88

vineyard, on the must amino acid and glutathione composition.

SC

RI PT

80

For these reasons, the aim of this work was to study the influence of foliar

90

application of arginine, urea, urea + sulphur and two commercial nitrogen fertilizers on

91

the must amino acid and glutathione composition in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard.

92

2. Materials and methods

94

2.1. Study site

TE D

93

M AN U

89

A field study was conducted on a commercial vineyard in Pencahue, Maule

96

Valley, Chile (35°20’S, 71°46’W; 87 m above sea level), during the 2015 growing

97

season. A 4 year old Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard, grown in 1103 Paulsen rootstock,

98

trained to a vertically shoot positioned system (2.3 x 1.0 m) with a plant density of

99

4,347 plants/ha was used. The vineyard was equipped with a drip irrigation system

100

using 4 l/h drippers, to assure the plant water needs. The vines were irrigated when the

101

leaf water potential (ψl) reached 1.0 to 1.2 MPa. The vineyard plot was homogeneous

102

on its vegetative expression and fruit load. The site´s annual average temperature is

103

14.5°C with a minimum of -2.5°C (July) and a maximum of 36.7°C (January), and an

AC C

EP

95

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 104

average annual rainfall of 583.8 mm. The vineyard soil is clay loam classified as

105

Cunculén series Vertic Haploxeralfs (CIREN, 1997).

106 107

2.2. Grapevines treatments In this study, five treatments were carried out using several nitrogen sources:

109

urea (Ur), urea plus sulphur (Ur+S), and arginine (Arg) (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt,

110

Germany), and two commercial products, Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) (Italpollina Spa,

111

Casalmenini, Italy) and Basfoliar Algae (BA) (Compo Agro, Santiago, Chile).

112

Treatments were made in triplicate and were distributed as a complete randomized

113

block design. Each replication was carried out on 20 vines, so a total of 60 plants were

114

used for each treatment, leaving 18 untreated plants in the same row and two rows

115

between replicates to avoid contamination. Treatments consisted of applying 2 kg N/ha

116

dose, divided in two moments, the first at the beginning of veraison and the second two

117

weeks later. In the Ur+S treatment besides the urea nitrogen, 0.5 kg/ha of sulphur for

118

each application was added. 200 ml of each formulation was applied evenly per plant by

119

spraying over the full canopy. Additionally, 60 plants, distributed as the same form,

120

were kept as an untreated (Control).

122 123

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

2.3. Commercial products nitrogen content

AC C

121

RI PT

108

Two foliar commercial products were applied to the vines. Basfoliar Algae is a

124

concentrated extract of Chilean natural algae (Durvillaea antarctica), supplemented

125

with nutrients, minerals and phytohormones (auxins and cytokinins) and Nutrimyr

126

Thiols is a foliar fertilizer which is sold as a wine flavor enhancer. The nitrogen content

127

of both products is the following:

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Basfoliar Algae (BA): the total nitrogen content was 6.9 %, of which 0.9 % was

129

from the following amino acids: 0.76 (Ala), 1.31 (Gly), 0.51 (Val), 0.29 (Thr), 0.35

130

(Ser), 0.73 (Leu), 0.34 (Ile), 0.69 (Pro), 0.06 (Cys), 0.54 (Hyp), 0.23 (Met), 0.69 (Asp),

131

0.45 (Phe), 0.93 (Glu), 0.57 (Lys), 0.30 (Tyr), 0.38 (Arg), and 0.09 (His), concentrations

132

expressed in g/l.

133 134

Nutrimyr Thiols (NT): the total nitrogen content was 16 %, with 1.2 % of organic nitrogen and 14.8 % of ureic nitrogen.

SC

135 136

RI PT

128

2.4. Harvest and must samples

Grapes were harvested at their optimal technological maturity, when the weight

138

of 200 berries remained constant, the content of soluble solids was approximately 24-25

139

°Brix and the total acidity remained between 5 to 6 g/l of tartaric acid.

M AN U

137

After harvesting, grapes were stored in a cold chamber at 6°C during one day

141

before processing and then were destemmed and crushed to obtain the must. Before

142

that, a portion of the grapes were separated to measure easily extractable anthocyanins

143

and total anthocyanins. The remaining must was protected by adding 50 mg SO2/kg

144

grape. The must of each repetition was introduced into 20 l tank, so 18 tanks were filled

145

(3 for each treatment). These deposits were stored at 6°C for pre-fermentative

146

maceration during two days. Immediately after, the oenological parameters were

147

determined in the obtained must (°Brix, density, pH, total acidity, total polyphenol

148

index (TPI) and yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN)). Then, aliquots of each sample were

149

frozen at -20ºC in order to subsequent determinations of amino acid composition.

AC C

EP

TE D

140

150 151 152

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 153

2.5. Oenological parameters and YAN analysis Grape and must analysis such as °Brix, pH, titratable acidity (g/l tartaric acid),

155

were determined according to the methodology established by OIV (2003). Easily

156

extractable anthocyanins and total anthocyanins were determined using the

157

methodology proposed by Glories and Augustin (1993) and total polyphenol index

158

(TPI) was calculated with the methodology developed by Bordeu and Scarpa (1998).

159

Yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) in must was analyzed with the Sörensen

160

methodology (1907). All treatments were performed in triplicate, the results of these

161

parameters are shown as the average of three analyses with their statistical difference

162

and their standard deviation (n = 3).

164

M AN U

163

SC

RI PT

154

2.6. Analysis of amino acids and glutathione by HPLC

Must amino acid and glutathione analysis was performed by the method

166

described by Garde-Cerdán et al. (2014). Free amino acids were analyzed by reversal-

167

phase HPLC using an Agilent 1100 Series (Palo Alto, USA), equipped with an ALS

168

automatic liquid sampler, a fluorescence detector and a diode array detector. Each

169

sample was centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20°C and then, 5 ml of the

170

sample was mixed with 100 µl of norvaline, internal standard for quantify all amino

171

acids except proline and 100 µl of sarcosine, internal standard for quantify proline. This

172

mixture was filtered through 0.45 µm OlimPeak pore filter (Teknokroma, Barcelona,

173

Spain) and submitted to an automatic pre column derivatization with o-

174

phthaldialdehyde (OPA Reagent, Agilent) and with 9-fluorenylmethylchloroformate

175

(FMOC Reagent, Agilent). The injected amount from the derivatized sample was 10 µl

176

at 40°C. All separations were performed on a Hypersil ODS (250 x 4.0 mm, I.D. 5 µm)

177

column (Agilent).

AC C

EP

TE D

165

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Two eluents, previously filtered through 0.45 µm OlimPeak pore filter

179

(Teknokroma, Barcelona, Spain), were used as mobile phases: eluent A: 75 mM sodium

180

acetate, 0.018 % triethylamine (pH 6.9) + 0.3 % tetrahydrofuran; eluent B: water,

181

methanol and acetonitrile (10:45:45, v/v/v). Identification of compounds was performed

182

by comparison of their retention times with their pure reference standards. The pure

183

reference compounds and internal standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.

184

Ammonium nitrogen was calculated as difference between YAN and amino nitrogen

185

without proline. The treatments were carried out in triplicate, so the results for free

186

amino acids correspond to average of three analysis (n = 3).

SC

RI PT

178

188

M AN U

187

2.7. Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis on oenological parameters, nitrogen fractions, amino acid

190

and glutathione composition was performed using variance analysis (one-way

191

ANOVA), by Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I. Differences between samples were

192

compared using the Duncan test at 95 % probability level. Principal component analysis

193

(PCA) was performed using InfoStat (www.infostat.com.ar).

EP

194

TE D

189

3. Results and discussion

196

3.1. Oenological parameters and nitrogen fractions

197

AC C

195

The oenological parameters and nitrogen fractions for Cabernet Sauvignon

198

musts are summarized in Table 1. The different treatments did not affect must °Brix, pH

199

or total acidity. Previous studies, where different nitrogen sources such as urea, urea +

200

sulphur, phenylalanine and proline were applied, showed similar results for these

201

parameters in Sauvignon blanc, Cabernet Sauvignon and Tempranillo musts (Lacroux et

202

al., 2008; Lasa et al., 2012; Hannam et al., 2013; Garde-Cerdán et al., 2014).

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 203

Nevertheless, other authors observed differences in Merlot and Tempranillo (Lasa et al.,

204

2012; Ancín-Azpilicueta et al., 2013). Significant effects were found in the content of grape phenolic maturity in must

206

for the arginine treatment (Arg). Easily extractable anthocyanins, total anthocyanins and

207

total polyphenol index (TPI) increased respect to the control when this application was

208

done (Table 1). So, this treatment may have a positive influence on the wine quality, as

209

the color is one of the principal parameters on the consumer’s choice. Portu, López-

210

Alfaro, Gómez-Alonso, López, and Garde-Cerdán (2015) reported that foliar application

211

of urea and phenylalanine improves the synthesis of polyphenol compounds.

212

Furthermore, together with the arginine, the NT treatment also increased the total

213

anthocyanins content, respect to the control and the other treatments. Urea did not affect

214

these parameters respect to the control, however, Ur+S decreased easily extractable

215

anthocyanins content. This effect was probably due to the action of the sulphur on the

216

plant as the urea did not modify this content.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

205

YAN must concentrations varied from 251 to 282 mg N/l, all of them considered

218

“moderate” levels of nitrogen, enough to develop a correct alcoholic fermentation

219

(Bely, Sablayrolles, & Barre, 1990; Bell & Henschke, 2005). All treatments increased

220

YAN values respect to the control, although the application of Ur+S and BA did not

221

significantly affect YAN values. Probably the increments were not very high due to the

222

fact that plants had already a moderate N level. Lasa et al. (2012) showed few or no

223

significant differences on YAN after the applications when control vines had already a

224

sufficient nitrogen level. The must coming from urea treatment showed the higher YAN

225

value.

AC C

EP

217

226

Ammonium ion is the most preferred nitrogen source by yeast, and it is readily

227

assimilated (Jiranek, Langridge, & Henschke, 1995; Bell & Henschke, 2005). The vines

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT treated with urea reached high contents of ammonium nitrogen while BA showed the

229

lowest amount of ammonium even lower than control musts (Table 1). Ammonium

230

accounted on average approximately for 50 % (BA), 57 % (Ur+S and NT), 63 % (Ctr),

231

67 % Arg and 71 % (Ur) of the YAN in grape juices. Similar percentage of ammonium

232

for YAN was observed by Huang and Ough (1989) in Cabernet Sauvignon. This variety

233

is a high proline accumulator with respect to arginine, so in this variety the ammonium

234

resulting in a greater contribution to YAN than amino nitrogen without proline (Bell &

235

Henschke, 2005).

SC

RI PT

228

Amino nitrogen is the nitrogen given by the amino acids. All treatments

237

increased the concentration of amino nitrogen, although only Ur and BA treatments

238

showed significant differences in relation to the control. The increase in urea treatment

239

was due to an increase of nitrogen from proline, since the other amino acids had similar

240

or lower concentration than control samples. Nevertheless, in the case of BA treatment,

241

it increased nitrogen from most of the amino acids. Proline is not metabolized by

242

Saccharomyces cerevisiae in suitable nitrogen concentrations on musts, so stuck or

243

sluggish fermentations can occur when YAN amount is low (Alexandre & Charpentier,

244

1998; Bisson & Butzke, 2000). By this reason, it is important to know the amino

245

nitrogen content without proline. This nitrogen content was not affected by the urea and

246

arginine treatment since not showed significant difference regarding the control.

247

Although, the treatment with urea did not increase the amino nitrogen without proline

248

content, the treatment with urea+sulphur did it. Other authors that applied urea and

249

urea+sulphur have observed an increase in its wine aromas when sulphur was present,

250

although they don´t study the amino acid composition (Lacroux et al., 2008). However,

251

in other crops, as wheat, was observed an increase on nitrogen when urea is applied

252

with sulphur respect to urea alone (Tea, Genter, Naulet, Lummerzheim & Kleiber,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

236

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 253

2007). Not only Ur+S showed an increase of amino nitrogen without proline, also NT

254

and BA did it. These treatments probably could improve the wine quality as the amino

255

acids play an important role in the formation of fermentation bouquet products (Bell &

256

Henschke, 2005).

258

RI PT

257

3.2. Amino acid content in grapes

Figure 1 shows control samples and the effect of different foliar nitrogen

260

applications such as urea (Ur), urea plus sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg) and nitrogen

261

commercial complex as Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA) on amino acids

262

concentration in Cabernet Sauvignon musts, except the proline content that was shown

263

in Table 1.

M AN U

SC

259

The amino acids found in higher concentrations were proline, arginine, GABA,

265

glutamic acid, and alanine (Figure 1a and Table 1). The proline concentrations varied

266

from 2,199 to 2,912 mg/l (Table 1), representing around 82 % to 89 % of total amino

267

acids, showing that Cabernet Sauvignon is high proline accumulator. These values are

268

normal in Cabernet Sauvignon variety (Huang & Ough, 1989; Huang & Ough, 1991;

269

Spayd, & Andersen-Bagge, 1996). However, these concentrations are very high respect

270

to other varieties as Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Merlot, Tempranillo,

271

Carignan, Grenache and so on (Hannam et al., 2016; Hernández-Orte, Cacho, &

272

Ferreira, 2002; Huang & Ough, 1991). Moreover, the different foliar treatments

273

increased the concentration of proline although this was only significant in Ur

274

treatment. Other authors have also observed an increase in proline when foliar urea is

275

applied to grapevines (Hannam et al., 2016; Garde-Cerdán et al., 2014).

AC C

EP

TE D

264

276

Arginine was the second most abundant amino acid in the samples, being

277

arginine an important nitrogen source for yeasts. The arginine concentrations varied

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from 99 to 156 mg/l (Figure 1a), lower values than those found by Huang and Ough

279

(1991), but according to other authors (Spayd & Andersen-Bagge, 1996; Hernández-

280

Orte et al., 2002; Bell & Henschke, 2005) in Cabernet Sauvignon samples. The urea and

281

arginine treatments did not affect the arginine content, nevertheless, BA treatment

282

increased the concentration of arginine in 44 % with regard to the control. Also Ur+S

283

and NT increased arginine content but not with significant differences.

RI PT

278

The concentration of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) varied from 84 to 101 mg/l.

285

GABA is catalyzed from glutamic acid by glutamic acid decarboxylase. Although

286

significant differences were observed among the samples in the case of glutamic acid,

287

none of the treatments applied modified the content of GABA (Figure 1a).

M AN U

SC

284

Glutamic acid and glutamine are key components of central nitrogen metabolism

289

and are preferred nitrogen source for yeasts (Watson, 1976; Bell & Henschke, 2005).

290

Moreover, glutamine is the most predominant amino acid in early berry development

291

and can act as a precursor of other amino acids as proline and arginine via glutamate

292

(Stines et al., 2000). The commercial products, NT and BA, applied to the vineyard,

293

increased must glutamine concentration, however, of these two products, only NT

294

treatment affected the concentration of glutamic acid (Figure 1a). In relation to the urea

295

treatment, it showed a lower content of glutamine and glutamic acid with respect to the

296

control. However, the Ur+S treatment increased the glutamic acid content, having not

297

effect in glutamine concentration.

EP

AC C

298

TE D

288

Alanine also constitutes a good source of nitrogen for yeast and its content is

299

correlated with volatiles compounds and yeast metabolites such as 2-ketopropionic acid,

300

acetaldehyde and ethanol (Bell & Henschke, 2005). Different effects were found in the

301

alanine content after treatments applications. BA increased the alanine concentrations,

302

showing an increase of 75 %. However, the Ur treatment decreased it a 39 %. Different

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT results after the urea applications have been obtained by other authors. On the one hand,

304

Lasa et al. (2012) did not find differences when applied urea at 10 kg N/ha in Merlot

305

and Sauvignon blanc vineyards. On the other hand, Hannam et al. (2016) found

306

differences when urea foliar application was carried out on the vineyard, increasing this

307

content compared to control and soil applications in Merlot vines.

RI PT

303

The concentration of serine, histidine, threonine, valine and leucine was in all

309

the samples around 12 and 25 mg/l. Ur, NT and BA treatments increased the

310

concentration of serine regarding the control. Histidine and valine did not show

311

significant differences in relation to the control. In the case of threonine, BA treatment

312

increased its content respect to the control whereas Ur treatment decreased it. In the

313

case of leucine was the NT treatment which presented significant differences in relation

314

to the control. The arginine foliar application did not affect the concentration of any of

315

the compounds shown in the Figure 1a.

M AN U

SC

308

The amino acids found in lower concentrations are shown in Figure 1b. Among

317

them, aspartic acid, tyrosine, cysteine, phenylalanine and isoleucine presented

318

concentrations from 5 to 9 mg/l whereas the sum of glycine, methionine, tryptophan,

319

ornithine and lysine, accounted for the 2 % of all amino acid content without proline.

320

These amino acids are usually in low concentrations in Cabernet Sauvignon as reported

321

by Hernández-Orte et al. (2002) and Huang and Ough (1989).

EP

AC C

322

TE D

316

Aspartic acid is one of the preferred sources of nitrogen by yeast at the start of

323

alcoholic fermentation and is quickly consumed (Arias-Gil et al., 2007). Significant

324

differences were found in aspartic acid content when Ur, Ur+S, Arg and NT were

325

applied to the vineyard. Ur and Arg treatments decreased its contents in musts samples

326

between 23 and 25 % respectively, while Ur+S and NT increased the amount

327

significantly in 42 and 51 %, respectively compared with control samples. Probably,

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 328

Ur+S and NT wines, would have high contents of higher alcohols due to aspartic acid

329

together with phenylalanine, alanine and threonine influence the production of higher

330

alcohols in wines. Tyrosine, cysteine, tryptophan and lysine concentrations were not modified due

332

to the foliar applications. Furthermore, no significant differences were found due to the

333

treatments regarding the control in asparagine, phenylalanine and isoleucine (Figure

334

1b), although there were differences among the treatments. Arginine treatment

335

decreased the content of glycine with respect to the control and the Ur+S treatment

336

enhanced its concentration. In relation to ornithine, NT treatment was the only one that

337

increased its content with respect to the control.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

331

Significant differences were found in the concentration of methionine due to the

339

treatment with Ur+S and BA (Figure 1b). Sulphur has an important role in the

340

methionine and cysteine formation (Jamal, Moon, & Abdin, 2010). However, in our

341

study, only methionine was affected by the treatment Ur+S.

TE D

338

It is important to compare the different effect of Ur and Ur+S application in the

343

content of amino acids. Ur+S treatment showed an increment in glutamic acid, aspartic

344

acid, glycine and methionine whereas Ur decreased some of them, as glutamic acid,

345

glutamine, threonine, alanine and aspartic acid. Thus, a different behavior was observed

346

between them. Not results have been found in the literature about urea with sulphur

347

foliar applications in amino acid grape content. However, we found two papers where

348

thiols concentration, after urea and urea+sulphur foliar application, was studied

349

(Lacroux et al., 2008; Geffroy, Dufourcq, López, Serrano, Gracia-Moreno, & Cacho,

350

2012). They observed that when sulphur is present, the thiols concentration is higher,

351

improving the aromatic expression.

AC C

EP

342

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nitrogen applications on vines improve the concentration of several amino acids,

353

total amino acids, and ammonium (Bell & Henschke, 2005). It has been found that

354

foliar application in the phenological state of veraison improves the nutrient absorption

355

in relation to soil application (Lacroux et al., 2008). However, soil fertilization cannot

356

be replaced due to technical difficulties to meet all the nutritional needs of the crop

357

through foliar applications. Hannam et al. (2016) showed that the concentrations of

358

several amino acids increased through foliar nitrogen application in relation to soil

359

nitrogen additions. Thereby, Ur+S, NT and BA applications stimulated the nitrogen

360

metabolism and therefore the synthesis of amino acids. This may lead to store nitrogen

361

on sources organs, which could be transported to sink organs, such as young leaves and

362

grapes.

363 364

3.3. Glutathione content in musts

M AN U

SC

RI PT

352

Figure 2 shows the foliar nitrogen effect on the glutathione amount in musts.

366

Significant differences were found in its concentration when Arg, NT and BA were

367

applied to vineyard. The NT treatment increased considerably the glutathione content in

368

grapes, folding 16 times the control value, followed by Arg and BA, in which the

369

concentration increased more than 10 times. No significant effects were found in Ur and

370

Ur+S applications with respect to the control samples. Glutathione concentration in

371

grapes is closely related to the vine nitrogen status estimated as must assimilable

372

nitrogen (Kritzinger, Bauer, and du Toit, 2013). Lacroux et al. (2008) reported an

373

increase in wine glutathione concentration, applying urea and urea plus sulphur in their

374

vines, although they applied them in major doses than in our study (10 kg N/ha of urea

375

and 5 kg /ha of sulphur). Also, these authors found that the effect was similar with or

376

without sulphur. For its part, Choné et al. (2006) reported an increase of yeast

AC C

EP

TE D

365

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 377

assimilable nitrogen and therefore an improvement of glutathione concentration when

378

was applied nitrogen on Sauvignon blanc vines. Probably, NT wines may be less

379

sensitive to oxidation due to its high content of glutathione, which may mean an

380

improvement in the wines quality from these grapes.

382

RI PT

381

3.4. Treatments classification

To classify the different treatments and assess its effects on the amino acid and

384

glutathione concentration in musts, PCA was performed (Figure 3). Principal

385

component 1 (PC 1) explained 60.0 % of the variance and principal component 2 (PC2)

386

explained 18.6 %, representing a 78.6 % of all the variance. PC 1 was strongly

387

correlated with Asp, Asn, Gly, Cys, Met, Phe, Ser, Thr, Arg, Ala, Val and Leu, while

388

PC 2 was strongly correlated only with His. PC 1 allowed to separate the different

389

samples. The Ur+S and BA treatments were correlated with major content of several

390

amino acids such as Met, Ile, Ala, Gln, Thr, Phe, Arg, Cys, Val, Ser and Leu, respect to

391

the other treatments. The NT treatment was correlated with high content of other amino

392

acids such as Asp, Lys, Asn, Glu, Orn, and GSH. The Ctr and Ur treatments were

393

correlated with minor amount of Cys, Met, Phe, Ile, Ser, Gln, Thr, Arg, Ala, Val and

394

Leu. Arg treatment was correlated with minor concentrations of the same amino acids

395

than Ctr and Ur including Gly, His and GABA but with major amount of Trp, Orn and

396

GSH.

398

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

397

SC

383

4. Conclusions

399

For high proline accumulator varieties as Cabernet Sauvignon, in vineyards with

400

moderate nitrogen conditions, foliar application using two commercial nitrogen

401

complex (NT and BA) improved must amino acid content. In relation to the urea

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT treatments (Ur and Ur+S), Ur+S treatment had a significant impact in the nitrogen

403

assimilation, so the sulphur applied together with urea improved grape amino acid

404

content respect to the treatment with urea. Commercial nitrogen products and Ur+S

405

were correlated with major concentration of amino acids than Control, Ur and Arg

406

treatments. Arg treatment increased the easily extractable anthocyanins, total

407

anthocyanins and total polyphenol index. Although, Arg treatment did not increase the

408

content of any amino acid, enhaced the synthesis of glutathione. Also, NT and BA

409

increased the concentration of this compound. The present study shows the first results

410

about foliar nitrogen applications in high proline accumulating varieties such as

411

Cabernet Sauvignon, so it could have oenological interest because contributes to gain

412

knowledge about the response of amino acids and glutathione content to different

413

nitrogen foliar applications.

414

Acknowledgements

TE D

415

M AN U

SC

RI PT

402

We wish to thank the San Pedro’s commercial vineyard (Winery in the Maule

417

Valley, Region del Maule, Pencahue, Chile), for their collaboration in this research. Our

418

thanks for the financial support given by the Universidad de Talca through Vicerrectoría

419

de Innovación y Transferencia Tecnológica and the Magister en Horticultura with the

420

proyect TAL1201 (RCE 860007). Many thanks for the financial support given by

421

Gobierno de La Rioja under the project R-11-14. T. G.-C. also wishes to thank the

422

Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)-

423

Gobierno de La Rioja and European Social Fund for her doctoral contract. A. G.-D.

424

thanks the Gobierno de La Rioja for the research personal formation grant.

AC C

EP

416

425 426

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 427

References

428

Acevedo-Opazo, C., Ortega-Farias, S., & Moreno, Y. (2004). Effect of three levels of water

application

during

post-setting

and

post-veraison

over

vegetative

430

development, productivity and grape quality on cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Acta

431

Horticulturae, 646, 143-146.

RI PT

429

Alexandre, H., & Charpentier, C. (1998). Biochemical aspects of stuck and sluggish

433

fermentation in grape must. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology,

434

20, 20−27.

SC

432

Ancín-Azpilicueta, C., Nieto-Rojo, R., & Gómez-Cordón, J. (2013). Effect of foliar

436

urea fertilisation on volatile compounds in Tempranillo wine. Journal of the Science

437

of Food and Agriculture, 93, 1485–1491.

M AN U

435

Arias-Gil, M., Garde-Cerdán, T., & Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. (2007). Influence of addition

439

of ammonium and different amino acid concentrations on nitrogen metabolism in

440

spontaneous must fermentation. Food Chemistry, 103, 1312–1318.

TE D

438

Bell, S.-J., & Henschke, P.A. (2005). Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes,

442

fermentation and wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 11, 242–

443

295.

EP

441

Bely, M., Sablayrolles, J.M., & Barre, P. (1990). Automatic detection of assimilable

445

nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions.

446 447 448 449 450

AC C

444

Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 70, 246−252.

Bisson, L.F., & Butzke, C.E. (2000). Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentations. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 51, 168 −177. Bordeu, E., & Scarpa, J.A. (1998). Análisis químico del vino. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 451

CIREN (1997). Estudio Agrológico, VII Región. Descripciones de Suelos. Materiales y

452

Símbolos. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales. Santiago. Publicación N°

453

117. 660 p. Carrau, F.M., Medina, K., Farina, L., Boido, E., & Dellacassa, E. (2010). Effect of

455

Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculum size on wine fermentation aroma compounds

456

and its relation with assimilable nitrogen content. International Journal of Food

457

Microbiology, 143, 81–85.

RI PT

454

Choné, X., Lavigne-Cruège, V., Tominaga, T., Van Leeuwen, C., Castagnède, C.,

459

Saucier, C., & Dubourdieu, D. (2006). Effect of vine nitrogen status on grape

460

aromatic potential: flavor precursors (s-cysteine conjugates), glutathione and

461

phenolic content in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc grape juice. Journal

462

International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin. 40, 1-6.

M AN U

SC

458

Conradie, W.J. (2001). Timing of nitrogen fertilisation and the effect of poultrymanure

464

on the performance of grapevines on sandy soil. I. Soil analysis, grape yield and

465

vegetative growth. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 22, 52–68.

466

Gambuti, A., Han, G., Peterson, A. L., & Waterhouse, A. L. (2015). Sulfur dioxide and

467

glutathione alter the outcome of microoxygenation. American Journal of Enology

468

and Viticulture, 66, 411–423.

AC C

EP

TE D

463

469

Garde-Cerdán, T., & Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. (2008). Effect of the addition of different

470

quantities of amino acids to nitrogen-deficient must on the formation of esters,

471 472

alcohols, and acids during wine alcoholic fermentation. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 41, 501–510.

473

Garde-Cerdán, T., Lorenzo, C., Lara, J. F., Pardo, F., Ancín-Azpilicueta, C., & Salinas,

474

M. R. (2009). Study of the evolution of nitrogen compounds during grape ripening.

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 475

Application to differentiate grape varieties and cultivated systems. Journal of

476

Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 2410–2419. Garde-Cerdán, T., Martínez-Gil, A. M., Lorenzo, C., Lara, J. F., Pardo, F., & Salinas,

478

M. R. (2011). Implications of nitrogen compounds during alcoholic fermentation

479

from some grape varieties at different maturation stages and cultivation systems.

480

Food Chemistry, 124, 106–116.

RI PT

477

Garde-Cerdán, T., López, R., Portu, J., González-Arenzana, L., López-Alfaro, I., &

482

Santamaría, P. (2014). Study of the effects of proline, phenylalanine, and urea foliar

483

application to Tempranillo vineyards on grape amino acid content. Comparison with

484

commercial nitrogen fertilisers. Food Chemistry, 163, 136–141.

M AN U

SC

481

Geffroy, O., Dufourcq, T., López, R., Serrano, E., Gracia-Moreno, E., & Cacho, J.

486

(2012). Impact de pulvérsations foliaires azotées réalisées à la véraison sur

487

caractéristiques aromatiques des vins rouges. In Actas del coloquio international

488

sobre los aromas del vino. Proyecto VINAROMAS (pp. 87-89), Zaragoza, Spain.

489

Glories, Y., & Augustin, M. (1993). Maturité phénolique du raisin, consequences

490

technologiques: application aux millesimes 1991 et 1992. Compte Rendu Colloque

491

Journée Technique. Bordeaux, CIVB: 56–61.

EP

TE D

485

Hannam, K.D., Neilsen, G.H., Neilsen, D., Rabie, W.S., Midwood, A.J., & Millard, P.

493

(2013). Late-season foliar urea applications can increase berry yeast-assimilable

494 495

AC C

492

nitrogen in winegrapes (Vitis vinifera L.). American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 65, 89–95.

496

Hannam, K.D., Neilsen, G.H., Neilsen, D., Midwood, A.J., Millard, P., Zhang, Z., &

497

Steinke, D. (2016). Amino acid composition of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) juice in

498

response to applications of urea to the soil or foliage. American Journal of Enology

499

and Viticulture, 67, 47-55.

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 500 501

Hernandez, A. (1997). Introducción al vino de Chile. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Hernández-Orte, P., Cacho, J., & Ferreira, V. (2002). Relationship between varietal

503

amino acid profile of grapes and wine aromatic composition. Experiments with

504

model solutions and chemometric study. Journal of Agricultural and Food

505

Chemistry, 50, 2891–2899.

RI PT

502

Huang, Z., & Ough, C.S. (1989). Effect of vineyard locations, varieties and rootstocks

507

on the juice amino acid composition of several cultivars. American Journal of

508

Enology and Viticulture, 40, 135–139.

510 511 512

Huang, Z., & Ough, C.S. (1991). Amino acid profiles of commercial grape juices and

M AN U

509

SC

506

wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 42, 261–267. Jamal, A., Moon, Y.S., & Abdin, M.Z. (2010). Sulphur -a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4, 523-529. Jiranek, V., Langridge, P., & Henschke, P.A. (1995). Amino acid and ammonium

514

utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts from a chemically defined

515

medium. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 46, 75–83.

517

Kritzinger, E.C., Bauer, F.F., & du Toit, W.J. (2013). Role of glutathione in

EP

516

TE D

513

winemaking: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61, 269-277. Lacroux, F., Tregoat, O., Van Leeuwen, C., Pons, A., Tominaga, T., Lavigne-Cruège,

519

V., & Dubourdieu, D. (2008). Effect of foliar nitrogen and sulphur application on

520 521

AC C

518

aromatic expression of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 42,125-132.

522

Lasa, B., Menendez, S., Sagastizabal, K., Cervantes, M. E. C., Irigoyen, I., Muro, J., &

523

Ariz, I. (2012). Foliar application of urea to “Sauvignon Blanc” and “Merlot” vines:

524

doses and time of application. Plant Growth Regulation, 67, 73–81.

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 525

Linsenmeir, A.W., Loos, U., & Löhnertz, O. (2008). Must composition and nitrogen

526

uptake in a long-term trial as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization in a cool-

527

climate Riesling vineyard. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59, 255–

528

265. Löhnertz, O., Prior, B., Bleser, M., & Linsenmeier, A.. (1998). Einfluß von

530

weinbaulichen Maßnahmen auf die Aminosäuregehalte in Trauben und Mosten der

531

Sorte Riesling. In Proceedings of Intervitis Interfructa. 5. Internationales

532

Symposium:

533

Weinbereitung, pp. 1-23.

in

der

Kellerwirtschaft.

Mikroorganismen

und

SC

Innovationen

RI PT

529

Martínez-Gil, A.M., Garde-Cerdán, T., Lorenzo, C., Lara, J.F., Pardo, F., & Salinas, M.

535

R. (2012). Volatile compounds formation in alcoholic fermentation from grapes

536

collected at 2 maturation stages: Influence of nitrogen compounds and grape variety.

537

Journal of Food Science, 77, C71–C79.

540 541

TE D

539

Moreno-Arribas, M.V., & Polo, M.C. (2009). Wine chemistry and biochemistry (1st ed.). New York: Springer.

OIV (2003). Compendium of internationals methods of wine and must analysis. Paris: OIV.

EP

538

M AN U

534

Peña-Neira, A., Dueñas, M., Duarte, A., Hernandez, T., Estrella, I., & Loyola, E.

543

(2004). Effects of ripening stages and of plant vegetative vigor on the phenolic

544 545

AC C

542

composition of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon in the Maipo Valley (Chile). Vitis, 43, 51–57.

546

Portu, J., López-Alfaro, I., Gómez-Alonso, S., López, R., & Garde-Cerdán, T. (2015).

547

Changes on grape phenolic composition induced by grapevine foliar applications of

548

phenylalanine and urea. Food Chemistry, 180, 171−180.

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 549

Sörensen,

S.P.L.

(1907).

Enzymstudien

I:

Über

die

quantitative

Messung

550

proteolytischer Spaltungen, Die formoltitrierung. Biochemische Zeitschrift, 7, 45-

551

101. Spayd, S.E., & Andersen-Bagge, J. (1996). Free amino acid composition of grape juice

553

from 12 Vitis vinifera cultivars in Washington. American Journal of Enology and

554

Viticulture, 47, 389–402.

RI PT

552

Stines, A.P., Grubb, J., Gockowiak, H., Henschke, P.A., Hoj, P.B., & van Heeswijck, R.

556

(2000). Proline and arginine accumulation in developing berries of Vitis vinifera L.

557

in Australian vineyards: Influence of vine cultivar, berry maturity and tissue type.

558

Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 6, 150–158.

M AN U

SC

555

Tea, I., Genter, T., Naulet, N., Lummerzheim, M., & Kleiber, D. (2007). Interaction

560

between nitrogen and sulfur by foliar application and its effects on flour bread-

561

making quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87, 2853–2859.

562

Ugliano, M., Kwiatkowski, M., Vidal, S., Capone, D., Siebert, T., Deval, J., Aagaard,

563

O., & Waters, E. (2011). Evolution of 3-mercaptohexanol, hidrogen sulfide, and

564

methyl mercaptan during bottle storage of Sauvignon blanc wines. Effect of

565

glutathione, cooper, oxygen exposure, and closure-derived oxygen. Journal of

566

Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59, 2564-2572.

EP

TE D

559

Watson, T.G. (1976). Amino-acid pool composition of Saccharomyces cerevisae as a

568

function of growth rate and amino-acid nitrogen source. Journal of General

569

AC C

567

Microbiology, 96, 263–268.

570

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure captions

572

Figure 1. Amino acid concentration (mg/l) in musts from untreated, control (Ctr), and

573

treated vineyards with different foliar nitrogen applications such as urea (Ur), urea with

574

sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg), and two different commercial products, Nutrimyr Thiols

575

(NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA). a) Glutamic acid (Glu), Serine (Ser), Glutamine (Gln),

576

Histidine (His), Threonine (Thr), Arginine (Arg), Alanine (Ala), γ-aminobutyric acid

577

(GABA), Valine (Va) and Leucine (Leu). b) Aspartic acid (Asp), Asparagine (Asn),

578

Glycine (Gly), Tyrosine (Tyr), Cysteine (Cys), Methionine (Met), Tryptophan (Trp),

579

Phenylalanine (Phe), Isoleucine (Ile), Ornithine (Orn), and Lysine (Lys); All parameters

580

are given with the standard deviation (n = 3). For each amino acid, different letters

581

indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

571

582

Figure 2. Glutathione (GSH) concentration (mg/l) in musts from untreated, control

584

(Ctr), and treated vineyards with different foliar nitrogen applications such as urea (Ur),

585

urea with sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg), and two different commercial products,

586

Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA). All parameters are given with the

587

standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05)

588

between treatments.

EP

AC C

589

TE D

583

590

Figure 3. Principal components analysis (PCA) performed with all amino acids (mg/l)

591

and glutathione (mg/l) in Cabernet Sauvignon samples from untreated, control (Ctr),

592

and treated vineyards with different foliar nitrogen applications such as arginine (Arg),

593

urea (Ur), urea with sulphur (Ur+S) and two different commercial products, Nutrimyr

594

Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA).

595

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Ur

Ur+S

Arg

NT

BA

°Brix

24.77 ± 1.10 a

25.00 ± 0.46 a

24.33 ± 0.86 a

25.10 ± 0.44 a

24.10 ± 0.87 a

23.93 ± 0.81 a

pH

3.97 ± 0.09 a

3.88 ± 0.09 a

3.91 ± 0.08 a

4.01 ± 0.06 a

3.98 ± 0.06 a

3.94 ± 0.03 a

Total acidity (g/l)*

5.68 ± 0.01 a

5.83 ± 0.66 a

5.82 ± 0.32 a

5.87 ± 0.09 a

5.91 ± 0.02 a

5.77 ± 0.09 a

Easily extractable anthocyanins (mg/l)

519.75 ± 115.83 b

539.58 ± 14.88 b

389.08 ± 82.27 a

681.33 ± 11.65 c

535.50 ± 48.72 b

461.42 ± 17.88 ab

Total anthocyanins (mg/l)

934.50 ± 37.12 a

889.58 ± 51.63 a

824.25 ± 39.60 a

1260.00 ± 78.01 b

1162.58 ± 84.22 b

898.92 ± 119.43 a

TPI**

13.93 ± 2.90 ab

15.70 ± 1.90 bc

12.03 ± 1.16 a

17.83 ± 1.30 c

14.93 ± 0.64 abc

13.00 ± 2.63 ab

YAN (mg N/l)

251.33 ± 9.02 a

282.00 ± 5.29 d

260.67 ± 10.07 abc

266.67 ± 6.11 bc

270.67 ± 10.07 cd

253.00 ± 5.29 ab

Ammonium nitrogen (mg N/l)

158.38 ± 10.76 bc

199.71 ± 9.87 d

150.60 ± 10.90 b

178.36 ± 9.55 cd

154.38 ± 15.60 b

126.30 ± 14.64 a

Amino nitrogen (mg N/l)

360.36 ± 41.37 a

436.48 ± 8.58 bc

395.30 ± 42.78 ab

380.97 ± 12.50 ab

390.55 ± 56.03 ab

469.31 ± 31.95 c

Proline (mg/l)

2199.00 ± 291.95 a

2912.67 ± 2.06 b

2345.60 ± 317.37 ab

2406.76 ± 42.44 ab

2255.39 ± 362.75 ab

2817.42 ± 150.54ab

Amino nitrogen without proline (mg N/l)

92.95 ± 5.87 a

82.29 ± 8.33 a

110.07 ± 4.19 b

88.30 ± 7.34 a

116.29 ± 11.91 b

126.70 ± 13.65 b

TE D

M AN U

SC

Control

RI PT

Table 1. Oenological parameters, and nitrogen fractions including proline concentration in must from untreated (Control) and treated grapevines with different nitrogen sources as foliar fertilizer: urea (Ur), urea with sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg), and different commercial products Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA).

≤ 0.05) between treatments. *Expressed as g/l tartaric acid.

AC C

EP

All parameters are given with their standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p **TPI: total polyphenol index.

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 1

RI PT

a) 180

c

160

SC

bc

140

b

a

mg/l

100

80

60

b

a a

20

b

b a

a

b

d

cd

bc a

ab

0

Ser

Gln

a a a a a a

AC C

Glu

e

EP

b

b

TE D

c c

40

a

a

a

M AN U

120

bc

c

a

His

Ur

a

a

d

ab

cd

Ur+S

c

bc

d

c

abc

b a

Thr Ctr

a a a

Arg Arg

NT

Ala

GABA

ab

bc a c c

Val

ab

ab

bc a c bc

Leu

BA

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RI PT

b) 12,00

c

c

a a a a a

b

a

b

8,00

a a

a

a

a

a

a

c abc bc abc ab a

4,00

b ab

c

c

ab

0,00

ab a

a

Tyr

Cys

Ctr

Ur

Ur+S

a

a

c

a

b

Met Arg

a a ab a

Trp NT

Phe

Ile

Orn

b

a a a a a

ab

Lys

BA

EP

Gly

TE D

2,00

Asn

ab

a a a a a a

ab b a

Asp

ab

ab ab

M AN U

a

abab ab

b

AC C

mg/l

b 6,00

SC

10,00

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 2

RI PT

50

c 45

SC

40 35

b

b

M AN U

25 20 15 10

a

a

Ctr

Ur

TE D

5

a

Ur+S

Arg

EP

0

NT

BA

Glutathione

AC C

mg/l

30

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Figure 3

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Study of foliar N application to Cabernet Sauvignon (Pro accumulator variety) vines Sulphur+urea treatment improved grape N assimilation respect to urea application Commercial N sprays improved must amino acid content Arginine treatment increased the content of polyphenols

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Foliar N application with organic sources increased the glutathione content