Accepted Manuscript Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboa, Teresa Garde-Cerdán, Ana Gonzalo-Diago, Yerko Moreno-Simunovic, Ana M. Martínez-Gil PII:
S0023-6438(16)30525-4
DOI:
10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.039
Reference:
YFSTL 5688
To appear in:
LWT - Food Science and Technology
Received Date: 24 February 2016 Revised Date:
8 August 2016
Accepted Date: 18 August 2016
Please cite this article as: Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G., Garde-Cerdán, T., Gonzalo-Diago, A., MorenoSimunovic, Y., Martínez-Gil, A.M., Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard, LWT - Food Science and Technology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.08.039. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and
2
glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard
3 4
Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboaa, Teresa Garde-Cerdánb, Ana Gonzalo-Diagob, Yerko
5
Moreno-Simunovica,*, Ana M. Martínez-Gila,* a
Centro Tecnológico de la Vid y el Vino, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Talca, Av. Lircay S/N, Talca, Chile. Tel: +56967676307. *e-mail:
[email protected];
7
[email protected]
8
11 12
Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (Gobierno de La Rioja-CSIC-Universidad de La Rioja). Carretera de Burgos Km. 6. Finca La Grajera. 26007 Logroño, Spain
SC
10
b
Abstract
M AN U
9
RI PT
6
The effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acid and
14
glutathione composition in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard was studied. Nitrogen
15
treatments applied to the grapevines were urea (Ur), urea plus sulphur (Ur+S) and
16
arginine (Arg). Also, two commercial nitrogen complexes, Basfoliar Algae (BA) and
17
Nutrimyr Thiols (NT), were used. For each treatment, 2 kg N/ha was applied, divided in
18
two applications. The commercial nitrogen complexes (NT and BA) improved the
19
amino acid content. Ur+S treatment had a better assimilation than Ur, increasing the
20
amino acid composition. Arg treatment did not increase the content of any amino acid,
21
however increased the easily extractable anthocyanins, total anthocyanins and total
22
polyphenol index. Organic sources treatments (Arg, NT and BA) increased glutathione
23
concentration. These results can be of oenological interest to improve grape quality
24
enhancing must amino acid and glutathione content in high proline accumulator variety.
25 26
Keywords: amino acids, glutathione, foliar application, vineyard, must, Cabernet
27
Sauvignon
AC C
EP
TE D
13
28 29
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 30
1. Introduction Cabernet Sauvignon is one of the most important varieties cultivated in Chile
32
accounting for almost 32 % of the area planted with wine grapes. It was introduced to
33
the country from Bordeaux along with other varieties around 1851, before the
34
phylloxera crisis (Hernandez, 1997). The raise of temperatures and decrease of
35
precipitations due to climate change in certain areas of the country, has led to a change
36
in the organoleptic profile of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes, so maintaining/improving
37
grape quality potential is an important challenge for the Chilean wine production. In this
38
context, Acevedo-Opazo, Ortega-Farias, and Moreno (2004) studied the effect of
39
different irrigation treatments in Cabernet Sauvignon grape quality, yield and vegetative
40
balance. The results showed that replacing 40 and 70 % of vine evapotranspiration is
41
possible to reduce water consumption, maintaining yield and grape composition. Also,
42
Peña-Neira et al. (2004) studied the phenolic compounds in skins and seeds during
43
ripening of low, medium and high vigor vines, showing that vigor alters the
44
concentration of all phenolic compounds. However, none of these studies considered the
45
potential changes in grape amino acid composition on Cabernet Sauvignon variety.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
31
Amino acids together with ammonium ion play an essential role as nitrogen
47
sources for yeast and lactic acid bacteria, responsible for alcoholic and malolactic
48
fermentations, respectively (Garde-Cerdán et al., 2009; Moreno-Arribas & Polo, 2009).
49
Thus, must nitrogen concentration affects yeast and bacteria growth and fermentation
50
processes, being involved indirectly in the final quality of wine (Arias-Gil, Garde-
51
Cerdán, & Ancín-Azpilicueta, 2007; Garde-Cerdán & Ancín-Azpilicueta, 2008; Carrau,
52
Medina, Farina, Boido, & Dellacasa, 2010; Garde-Cerdán et al., 2011; Martínez-Gil et
53
al., 2012). A good parameter to estimate must fermentability is the concentration of
54
amino acids in the must (Löhnertz, Prior, Bleser, & Linsenmeier, 1998). A traditional
AC C
EP
46
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT way to increase N must content has been soil N fertilization as reported by Conradie
56
(2001) and Linsenmeir, Loos, and Löhnertz (2008) who studied the effects of N soil
57
application on grape amino acid composition. Another strategy is to increase N vine
58
status by means of foliar N applications, an interesting technique because of the quick
59
and efficient assimilation of applied products by plants (Lasa et al., 2012). Previous
60
studies have shown that urea foliar application affects grape and wine composition
61
(Ancín-Azpilicueta, Nieto-Rojo, & Gómez-Cordón, 2013; Lasa et al., 2012; Garde-
62
Cerdán et al., 2014). In recent years, new commercial nitrogen fertilizers, whose
63
composition includes amino acids with nutritional purposes, are emerging on the
64
market. Some of the products used to improve the quality of grapes through foliar
65
applications are Basfoliar Algae and Nutrimyr Thiols. The first one is a concentrated
66
extract of Chilean natural algae (Durvillaea antarctica) that could stimulate the
67
synthesis of different compounds on grapes. For its part, Nutrimyr Thiols is a foliar
68
fertilizer which is sold as a wine flavor enhancer. So, it is interesting to study the effect
69
that foliar commercial products have on the grape quality.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
55
However, only a single publication has studied the effect of foliar vineyard
71
application of amino acids on must amino acid content. In this study, phenylalanine
72
foliar applications improved Tempranillo must amino acid content, however the use of
73
proline had no effect (Garde-Cerdán et al., 2014). To our knowledge this is the first
74
report regarding the use of arginine as a new fertilizer. Of all amino acids that may be
75
present in grape juice, proline and arginine are those found in highest amounts (Bell &
76
Henschke, 2005). To study the vine´s response to arginine foliar application turns out to
77
be interesting because this is one of the most abundant amino acid in grape musts, being
78
an important yeast nitrogen source. Another interesting molecule composed by three
79
different amino acids, cysteine, glutamic acid and glycine is the glutathione. The
AC C
EP
70
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT function of this tripeptide in winemaking has been recently discussed and reviewed by
81
Kritzinger, Bauer, and du Toit (2013). This molecule acts as an antioxidant, preventing
82
the appearance of browning pigments in musts and protecting anthocyanins from
83
oxidation (Gambuti, Han, Peterson, & Waterhouse, 2015). Glutathione also exerts a
84
protective effect in wine volatile compounds (Ugliano et al., 2011) but until now, there
85
were no studies in the literature reporting the effects of foliar N application on the
86
content of glutathione in grapes. Thus, there is already a lack of information relating to
87
the impact of nitrogen application, and more concretely, amino acid application in the
88
vineyard, on the must amino acid and glutathione composition.
SC
RI PT
80
For these reasons, the aim of this work was to study the influence of foliar
90
application of arginine, urea, urea + sulphur and two commercial nitrogen fertilizers on
91
the must amino acid and glutathione composition in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard.
92
2. Materials and methods
94
2.1. Study site
TE D
93
M AN U
89
A field study was conducted on a commercial vineyard in Pencahue, Maule
96
Valley, Chile (35°20’S, 71°46’W; 87 m above sea level), during the 2015 growing
97
season. A 4 year old Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard, grown in 1103 Paulsen rootstock,
98
trained to a vertically shoot positioned system (2.3 x 1.0 m) with a plant density of
99
4,347 plants/ha was used. The vineyard was equipped with a drip irrigation system
100
using 4 l/h drippers, to assure the plant water needs. The vines were irrigated when the
101
leaf water potential (ψl) reached 1.0 to 1.2 MPa. The vineyard plot was homogeneous
102
on its vegetative expression and fruit load. The site´s annual average temperature is
103
14.5°C with a minimum of -2.5°C (July) and a maximum of 36.7°C (January), and an
AC C
EP
95
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 104
average annual rainfall of 583.8 mm. The vineyard soil is clay loam classified as
105
Cunculén series Vertic Haploxeralfs (CIREN, 1997).
106 107
2.2. Grapevines treatments In this study, five treatments were carried out using several nitrogen sources:
109
urea (Ur), urea plus sulphur (Ur+S), and arginine (Arg) (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt,
110
Germany), and two commercial products, Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) (Italpollina Spa,
111
Casalmenini, Italy) and Basfoliar Algae (BA) (Compo Agro, Santiago, Chile).
112
Treatments were made in triplicate and were distributed as a complete randomized
113
block design. Each replication was carried out on 20 vines, so a total of 60 plants were
114
used for each treatment, leaving 18 untreated plants in the same row and two rows
115
between replicates to avoid contamination. Treatments consisted of applying 2 kg N/ha
116
dose, divided in two moments, the first at the beginning of veraison and the second two
117
weeks later. In the Ur+S treatment besides the urea nitrogen, 0.5 kg/ha of sulphur for
118
each application was added. 200 ml of each formulation was applied evenly per plant by
119
spraying over the full canopy. Additionally, 60 plants, distributed as the same form,
120
were kept as an untreated (Control).
122 123
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
2.3. Commercial products nitrogen content
AC C
121
RI PT
108
Two foliar commercial products were applied to the vines. Basfoliar Algae is a
124
concentrated extract of Chilean natural algae (Durvillaea antarctica), supplemented
125
with nutrients, minerals and phytohormones (auxins and cytokinins) and Nutrimyr
126
Thiols is a foliar fertilizer which is sold as a wine flavor enhancer. The nitrogen content
127
of both products is the following:
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Basfoliar Algae (BA): the total nitrogen content was 6.9 %, of which 0.9 % was
129
from the following amino acids: 0.76 (Ala), 1.31 (Gly), 0.51 (Val), 0.29 (Thr), 0.35
130
(Ser), 0.73 (Leu), 0.34 (Ile), 0.69 (Pro), 0.06 (Cys), 0.54 (Hyp), 0.23 (Met), 0.69 (Asp),
131
0.45 (Phe), 0.93 (Glu), 0.57 (Lys), 0.30 (Tyr), 0.38 (Arg), and 0.09 (His), concentrations
132
expressed in g/l.
133 134
Nutrimyr Thiols (NT): the total nitrogen content was 16 %, with 1.2 % of organic nitrogen and 14.8 % of ureic nitrogen.
SC
135 136
RI PT
128
2.4. Harvest and must samples
Grapes were harvested at their optimal technological maturity, when the weight
138
of 200 berries remained constant, the content of soluble solids was approximately 24-25
139
°Brix and the total acidity remained between 5 to 6 g/l of tartaric acid.
M AN U
137
After harvesting, grapes were stored in a cold chamber at 6°C during one day
141
before processing and then were destemmed and crushed to obtain the must. Before
142
that, a portion of the grapes were separated to measure easily extractable anthocyanins
143
and total anthocyanins. The remaining must was protected by adding 50 mg SO2/kg
144
grape. The must of each repetition was introduced into 20 l tank, so 18 tanks were filled
145
(3 for each treatment). These deposits were stored at 6°C for pre-fermentative
146
maceration during two days. Immediately after, the oenological parameters were
147
determined in the obtained must (°Brix, density, pH, total acidity, total polyphenol
148
index (TPI) and yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN)). Then, aliquots of each sample were
149
frozen at -20ºC in order to subsequent determinations of amino acid composition.
AC C
EP
TE D
140
150 151 152
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 153
2.5. Oenological parameters and YAN analysis Grape and must analysis such as °Brix, pH, titratable acidity (g/l tartaric acid),
155
were determined according to the methodology established by OIV (2003). Easily
156
extractable anthocyanins and total anthocyanins were determined using the
157
methodology proposed by Glories and Augustin (1993) and total polyphenol index
158
(TPI) was calculated with the methodology developed by Bordeu and Scarpa (1998).
159
Yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) in must was analyzed with the Sörensen
160
methodology (1907). All treatments were performed in triplicate, the results of these
161
parameters are shown as the average of three analyses with their statistical difference
162
and their standard deviation (n = 3).
164
M AN U
163
SC
RI PT
154
2.6. Analysis of amino acids and glutathione by HPLC
Must amino acid and glutathione analysis was performed by the method
166
described by Garde-Cerdán et al. (2014). Free amino acids were analyzed by reversal-
167
phase HPLC using an Agilent 1100 Series (Palo Alto, USA), equipped with an ALS
168
automatic liquid sampler, a fluorescence detector and a diode array detector. Each
169
sample was centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 20°C and then, 5 ml of the
170
sample was mixed with 100 µl of norvaline, internal standard for quantify all amino
171
acids except proline and 100 µl of sarcosine, internal standard for quantify proline. This
172
mixture was filtered through 0.45 µm OlimPeak pore filter (Teknokroma, Barcelona,
173
Spain) and submitted to an automatic pre column derivatization with o-
174
phthaldialdehyde (OPA Reagent, Agilent) and with 9-fluorenylmethylchloroformate
175
(FMOC Reagent, Agilent). The injected amount from the derivatized sample was 10 µl
176
at 40°C. All separations were performed on a Hypersil ODS (250 x 4.0 mm, I.D. 5 µm)
177
column (Agilent).
AC C
EP
TE D
165
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Two eluents, previously filtered through 0.45 µm OlimPeak pore filter
179
(Teknokroma, Barcelona, Spain), were used as mobile phases: eluent A: 75 mM sodium
180
acetate, 0.018 % triethylamine (pH 6.9) + 0.3 % tetrahydrofuran; eluent B: water,
181
methanol and acetonitrile (10:45:45, v/v/v). Identification of compounds was performed
182
by comparison of their retention times with their pure reference standards. The pure
183
reference compounds and internal standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
184
Ammonium nitrogen was calculated as difference between YAN and amino nitrogen
185
without proline. The treatments were carried out in triplicate, so the results for free
186
amino acids correspond to average of three analysis (n = 3).
SC
RI PT
178
188
M AN U
187
2.7. Statistical analysis
A statistical analysis on oenological parameters, nitrogen fractions, amino acid
190
and glutathione composition was performed using variance analysis (one-way
191
ANOVA), by Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I. Differences between samples were
192
compared using the Duncan test at 95 % probability level. Principal component analysis
193
(PCA) was performed using InfoStat (www.infostat.com.ar).
EP
194
TE D
189
3. Results and discussion
196
3.1. Oenological parameters and nitrogen fractions
197
AC C
195
The oenological parameters and nitrogen fractions for Cabernet Sauvignon
198
musts are summarized in Table 1. The different treatments did not affect must °Brix, pH
199
or total acidity. Previous studies, where different nitrogen sources such as urea, urea +
200
sulphur, phenylalanine and proline were applied, showed similar results for these
201
parameters in Sauvignon blanc, Cabernet Sauvignon and Tempranillo musts (Lacroux et
202
al., 2008; Lasa et al., 2012; Hannam et al., 2013; Garde-Cerdán et al., 2014).
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 203
Nevertheless, other authors observed differences in Merlot and Tempranillo (Lasa et al.,
204
2012; Ancín-Azpilicueta et al., 2013). Significant effects were found in the content of grape phenolic maturity in must
206
for the arginine treatment (Arg). Easily extractable anthocyanins, total anthocyanins and
207
total polyphenol index (TPI) increased respect to the control when this application was
208
done (Table 1). So, this treatment may have a positive influence on the wine quality, as
209
the color is one of the principal parameters on the consumer’s choice. Portu, López-
210
Alfaro, Gómez-Alonso, López, and Garde-Cerdán (2015) reported that foliar application
211
of urea and phenylalanine improves the synthesis of polyphenol compounds.
212
Furthermore, together with the arginine, the NT treatment also increased the total
213
anthocyanins content, respect to the control and the other treatments. Urea did not affect
214
these parameters respect to the control, however, Ur+S decreased easily extractable
215
anthocyanins content. This effect was probably due to the action of the sulphur on the
216
plant as the urea did not modify this content.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
205
YAN must concentrations varied from 251 to 282 mg N/l, all of them considered
218
“moderate” levels of nitrogen, enough to develop a correct alcoholic fermentation
219
(Bely, Sablayrolles, & Barre, 1990; Bell & Henschke, 2005). All treatments increased
220
YAN values respect to the control, although the application of Ur+S and BA did not
221
significantly affect YAN values. Probably the increments were not very high due to the
222
fact that plants had already a moderate N level. Lasa et al. (2012) showed few or no
223
significant differences on YAN after the applications when control vines had already a
224
sufficient nitrogen level. The must coming from urea treatment showed the higher YAN
225
value.
AC C
EP
217
226
Ammonium ion is the most preferred nitrogen source by yeast, and it is readily
227
assimilated (Jiranek, Langridge, & Henschke, 1995; Bell & Henschke, 2005). The vines
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT treated with urea reached high contents of ammonium nitrogen while BA showed the
229
lowest amount of ammonium even lower than control musts (Table 1). Ammonium
230
accounted on average approximately for 50 % (BA), 57 % (Ur+S and NT), 63 % (Ctr),
231
67 % Arg and 71 % (Ur) of the YAN in grape juices. Similar percentage of ammonium
232
for YAN was observed by Huang and Ough (1989) in Cabernet Sauvignon. This variety
233
is a high proline accumulator with respect to arginine, so in this variety the ammonium
234
resulting in a greater contribution to YAN than amino nitrogen without proline (Bell &
235
Henschke, 2005).
SC
RI PT
228
Amino nitrogen is the nitrogen given by the amino acids. All treatments
237
increased the concentration of amino nitrogen, although only Ur and BA treatments
238
showed significant differences in relation to the control. The increase in urea treatment
239
was due to an increase of nitrogen from proline, since the other amino acids had similar
240
or lower concentration than control samples. Nevertheless, in the case of BA treatment,
241
it increased nitrogen from most of the amino acids. Proline is not metabolized by
242
Saccharomyces cerevisiae in suitable nitrogen concentrations on musts, so stuck or
243
sluggish fermentations can occur when YAN amount is low (Alexandre & Charpentier,
244
1998; Bisson & Butzke, 2000). By this reason, it is important to know the amino
245
nitrogen content without proline. This nitrogen content was not affected by the urea and
246
arginine treatment since not showed significant difference regarding the control.
247
Although, the treatment with urea did not increase the amino nitrogen without proline
248
content, the treatment with urea+sulphur did it. Other authors that applied urea and
249
urea+sulphur have observed an increase in its wine aromas when sulphur was present,
250
although they don´t study the amino acid composition (Lacroux et al., 2008). However,
251
in other crops, as wheat, was observed an increase on nitrogen when urea is applied
252
with sulphur respect to urea alone (Tea, Genter, Naulet, Lummerzheim & Kleiber,
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
236
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 253
2007). Not only Ur+S showed an increase of amino nitrogen without proline, also NT
254
and BA did it. These treatments probably could improve the wine quality as the amino
255
acids play an important role in the formation of fermentation bouquet products (Bell &
256
Henschke, 2005).
258
RI PT
257
3.2. Amino acid content in grapes
Figure 1 shows control samples and the effect of different foliar nitrogen
260
applications such as urea (Ur), urea plus sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg) and nitrogen
261
commercial complex as Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA) on amino acids
262
concentration in Cabernet Sauvignon musts, except the proline content that was shown
263
in Table 1.
M AN U
SC
259
The amino acids found in higher concentrations were proline, arginine, GABA,
265
glutamic acid, and alanine (Figure 1a and Table 1). The proline concentrations varied
266
from 2,199 to 2,912 mg/l (Table 1), representing around 82 % to 89 % of total amino
267
acids, showing that Cabernet Sauvignon is high proline accumulator. These values are
268
normal in Cabernet Sauvignon variety (Huang & Ough, 1989; Huang & Ough, 1991;
269
Spayd, & Andersen-Bagge, 1996). However, these concentrations are very high respect
270
to other varieties as Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Merlot, Tempranillo,
271
Carignan, Grenache and so on (Hannam et al., 2016; Hernández-Orte, Cacho, &
272
Ferreira, 2002; Huang & Ough, 1991). Moreover, the different foliar treatments
273
increased the concentration of proline although this was only significant in Ur
274
treatment. Other authors have also observed an increase in proline when foliar urea is
275
applied to grapevines (Hannam et al., 2016; Garde-Cerdán et al., 2014).
AC C
EP
TE D
264
276
Arginine was the second most abundant amino acid in the samples, being
277
arginine an important nitrogen source for yeasts. The arginine concentrations varied
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from 99 to 156 mg/l (Figure 1a), lower values than those found by Huang and Ough
279
(1991), but according to other authors (Spayd & Andersen-Bagge, 1996; Hernández-
280
Orte et al., 2002; Bell & Henschke, 2005) in Cabernet Sauvignon samples. The urea and
281
arginine treatments did not affect the arginine content, nevertheless, BA treatment
282
increased the concentration of arginine in 44 % with regard to the control. Also Ur+S
283
and NT increased arginine content but not with significant differences.
RI PT
278
The concentration of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) varied from 84 to 101 mg/l.
285
GABA is catalyzed from glutamic acid by glutamic acid decarboxylase. Although
286
significant differences were observed among the samples in the case of glutamic acid,
287
none of the treatments applied modified the content of GABA (Figure 1a).
M AN U
SC
284
Glutamic acid and glutamine are key components of central nitrogen metabolism
289
and are preferred nitrogen source for yeasts (Watson, 1976; Bell & Henschke, 2005).
290
Moreover, glutamine is the most predominant amino acid in early berry development
291
and can act as a precursor of other amino acids as proline and arginine via glutamate
292
(Stines et al., 2000). The commercial products, NT and BA, applied to the vineyard,
293
increased must glutamine concentration, however, of these two products, only NT
294
treatment affected the concentration of glutamic acid (Figure 1a). In relation to the urea
295
treatment, it showed a lower content of glutamine and glutamic acid with respect to the
296
control. However, the Ur+S treatment increased the glutamic acid content, having not
297
effect in glutamine concentration.
EP
AC C
298
TE D
288
Alanine also constitutes a good source of nitrogen for yeast and its content is
299
correlated with volatiles compounds and yeast metabolites such as 2-ketopropionic acid,
300
acetaldehyde and ethanol (Bell & Henschke, 2005). Different effects were found in the
301
alanine content after treatments applications. BA increased the alanine concentrations,
302
showing an increase of 75 %. However, the Ur treatment decreased it a 39 %. Different
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT results after the urea applications have been obtained by other authors. On the one hand,
304
Lasa et al. (2012) did not find differences when applied urea at 10 kg N/ha in Merlot
305
and Sauvignon blanc vineyards. On the other hand, Hannam et al. (2016) found
306
differences when urea foliar application was carried out on the vineyard, increasing this
307
content compared to control and soil applications in Merlot vines.
RI PT
303
The concentration of serine, histidine, threonine, valine and leucine was in all
309
the samples around 12 and 25 mg/l. Ur, NT and BA treatments increased the
310
concentration of serine regarding the control. Histidine and valine did not show
311
significant differences in relation to the control. In the case of threonine, BA treatment
312
increased its content respect to the control whereas Ur treatment decreased it. In the
313
case of leucine was the NT treatment which presented significant differences in relation
314
to the control. The arginine foliar application did not affect the concentration of any of
315
the compounds shown in the Figure 1a.
M AN U
SC
308
The amino acids found in lower concentrations are shown in Figure 1b. Among
317
them, aspartic acid, tyrosine, cysteine, phenylalanine and isoleucine presented
318
concentrations from 5 to 9 mg/l whereas the sum of glycine, methionine, tryptophan,
319
ornithine and lysine, accounted for the 2 % of all amino acid content without proline.
320
These amino acids are usually in low concentrations in Cabernet Sauvignon as reported
321
by Hernández-Orte et al. (2002) and Huang and Ough (1989).
EP
AC C
322
TE D
316
Aspartic acid is one of the preferred sources of nitrogen by yeast at the start of
323
alcoholic fermentation and is quickly consumed (Arias-Gil et al., 2007). Significant
324
differences were found in aspartic acid content when Ur, Ur+S, Arg and NT were
325
applied to the vineyard. Ur and Arg treatments decreased its contents in musts samples
326
between 23 and 25 % respectively, while Ur+S and NT increased the amount
327
significantly in 42 and 51 %, respectively compared with control samples. Probably,
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 328
Ur+S and NT wines, would have high contents of higher alcohols due to aspartic acid
329
together with phenylalanine, alanine and threonine influence the production of higher
330
alcohols in wines. Tyrosine, cysteine, tryptophan and lysine concentrations were not modified due
332
to the foliar applications. Furthermore, no significant differences were found due to the
333
treatments regarding the control in asparagine, phenylalanine and isoleucine (Figure
334
1b), although there were differences among the treatments. Arginine treatment
335
decreased the content of glycine with respect to the control and the Ur+S treatment
336
enhanced its concentration. In relation to ornithine, NT treatment was the only one that
337
increased its content with respect to the control.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
331
Significant differences were found in the concentration of methionine due to the
339
treatment with Ur+S and BA (Figure 1b). Sulphur has an important role in the
340
methionine and cysteine formation (Jamal, Moon, & Abdin, 2010). However, in our
341
study, only methionine was affected by the treatment Ur+S.
TE D
338
It is important to compare the different effect of Ur and Ur+S application in the
343
content of amino acids. Ur+S treatment showed an increment in glutamic acid, aspartic
344
acid, glycine and methionine whereas Ur decreased some of them, as glutamic acid,
345
glutamine, threonine, alanine and aspartic acid. Thus, a different behavior was observed
346
between them. Not results have been found in the literature about urea with sulphur
347
foliar applications in amino acid grape content. However, we found two papers where
348
thiols concentration, after urea and urea+sulphur foliar application, was studied
349
(Lacroux et al., 2008; Geffroy, Dufourcq, López, Serrano, Gracia-Moreno, & Cacho,
350
2012). They observed that when sulphur is present, the thiols concentration is higher,
351
improving the aromatic expression.
AC C
EP
342
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nitrogen applications on vines improve the concentration of several amino acids,
353
total amino acids, and ammonium (Bell & Henschke, 2005). It has been found that
354
foliar application in the phenological state of veraison improves the nutrient absorption
355
in relation to soil application (Lacroux et al., 2008). However, soil fertilization cannot
356
be replaced due to technical difficulties to meet all the nutritional needs of the crop
357
through foliar applications. Hannam et al. (2016) showed that the concentrations of
358
several amino acids increased through foliar nitrogen application in relation to soil
359
nitrogen additions. Thereby, Ur+S, NT and BA applications stimulated the nitrogen
360
metabolism and therefore the synthesis of amino acids. This may lead to store nitrogen
361
on sources organs, which could be transported to sink organs, such as young leaves and
362
grapes.
363 364
3.3. Glutathione content in musts
M AN U
SC
RI PT
352
Figure 2 shows the foliar nitrogen effect on the glutathione amount in musts.
366
Significant differences were found in its concentration when Arg, NT and BA were
367
applied to vineyard. The NT treatment increased considerably the glutathione content in
368
grapes, folding 16 times the control value, followed by Arg and BA, in which the
369
concentration increased more than 10 times. No significant effects were found in Ur and
370
Ur+S applications with respect to the control samples. Glutathione concentration in
371
grapes is closely related to the vine nitrogen status estimated as must assimilable
372
nitrogen (Kritzinger, Bauer, and du Toit, 2013). Lacroux et al. (2008) reported an
373
increase in wine glutathione concentration, applying urea and urea plus sulphur in their
374
vines, although they applied them in major doses than in our study (10 kg N/ha of urea
375
and 5 kg /ha of sulphur). Also, these authors found that the effect was similar with or
376
without sulphur. For its part, Choné et al. (2006) reported an increase of yeast
AC C
EP
TE D
365
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 377
assimilable nitrogen and therefore an improvement of glutathione concentration when
378
was applied nitrogen on Sauvignon blanc vines. Probably, NT wines may be less
379
sensitive to oxidation due to its high content of glutathione, which may mean an
380
improvement in the wines quality from these grapes.
382
RI PT
381
3.4. Treatments classification
To classify the different treatments and assess its effects on the amino acid and
384
glutathione concentration in musts, PCA was performed (Figure 3). Principal
385
component 1 (PC 1) explained 60.0 % of the variance and principal component 2 (PC2)
386
explained 18.6 %, representing a 78.6 % of all the variance. PC 1 was strongly
387
correlated with Asp, Asn, Gly, Cys, Met, Phe, Ser, Thr, Arg, Ala, Val and Leu, while
388
PC 2 was strongly correlated only with His. PC 1 allowed to separate the different
389
samples. The Ur+S and BA treatments were correlated with major content of several
390
amino acids such as Met, Ile, Ala, Gln, Thr, Phe, Arg, Cys, Val, Ser and Leu, respect to
391
the other treatments. The NT treatment was correlated with high content of other amino
392
acids such as Asp, Lys, Asn, Glu, Orn, and GSH. The Ctr and Ur treatments were
393
correlated with minor amount of Cys, Met, Phe, Ile, Ser, Gln, Thr, Arg, Ala, Val and
394
Leu. Arg treatment was correlated with minor concentrations of the same amino acids
395
than Ctr and Ur including Gly, His and GABA but with major amount of Trp, Orn and
396
GSH.
398
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
397
SC
383
4. Conclusions
399
For high proline accumulator varieties as Cabernet Sauvignon, in vineyards with
400
moderate nitrogen conditions, foliar application using two commercial nitrogen
401
complex (NT and BA) improved must amino acid content. In relation to the urea
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT treatments (Ur and Ur+S), Ur+S treatment had a significant impact in the nitrogen
403
assimilation, so the sulphur applied together with urea improved grape amino acid
404
content respect to the treatment with urea. Commercial nitrogen products and Ur+S
405
were correlated with major concentration of amino acids than Control, Ur and Arg
406
treatments. Arg treatment increased the easily extractable anthocyanins, total
407
anthocyanins and total polyphenol index. Although, Arg treatment did not increase the
408
content of any amino acid, enhaced the synthesis of glutathione. Also, NT and BA
409
increased the concentration of this compound. The present study shows the first results
410
about foliar nitrogen applications in high proline accumulating varieties such as
411
Cabernet Sauvignon, so it could have oenological interest because contributes to gain
412
knowledge about the response of amino acids and glutathione content to different
413
nitrogen foliar applications.
414
Acknowledgements
TE D
415
M AN U
SC
RI PT
402
We wish to thank the San Pedro’s commercial vineyard (Winery in the Maule
417
Valley, Region del Maule, Pencahue, Chile), for their collaboration in this research. Our
418
thanks for the financial support given by the Universidad de Talca through Vicerrectoría
419
de Innovación y Transferencia Tecnológica and the Magister en Horticultura with the
420
proyect TAL1201 (RCE 860007). Many thanks for the financial support given by
421
Gobierno de La Rioja under the project R-11-14. T. G.-C. also wishes to thank the
422
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)-
423
Gobierno de La Rioja and European Social Fund for her doctoral contract. A. G.-D.
424
thanks the Gobierno de La Rioja for the research personal formation grant.
AC C
EP
416
425 426
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 427
References
428
Acevedo-Opazo, C., Ortega-Farias, S., & Moreno, Y. (2004). Effect of three levels of water
application
during
post-setting
and
post-veraison
over
vegetative
430
development, productivity and grape quality on cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Acta
431
Horticulturae, 646, 143-146.
RI PT
429
Alexandre, H., & Charpentier, C. (1998). Biochemical aspects of stuck and sluggish
433
fermentation in grape must. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology,
434
20, 20−27.
SC
432
Ancín-Azpilicueta, C., Nieto-Rojo, R., & Gómez-Cordón, J. (2013). Effect of foliar
436
urea fertilisation on volatile compounds in Tempranillo wine. Journal of the Science
437
of Food and Agriculture, 93, 1485–1491.
M AN U
435
Arias-Gil, M., Garde-Cerdán, T., & Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. (2007). Influence of addition
439
of ammonium and different amino acid concentrations on nitrogen metabolism in
440
spontaneous must fermentation. Food Chemistry, 103, 1312–1318.
TE D
438
Bell, S.-J., & Henschke, P.A. (2005). Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes,
442
fermentation and wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 11, 242–
443
295.
EP
441
Bely, M., Sablayrolles, J.M., & Barre, P. (1990). Automatic detection of assimilable
445
nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions.
446 447 448 449 450
AC C
444
Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 70, 246−252.
Bisson, L.F., & Butzke, C.E. (2000). Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentations. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 51, 168 −177. Bordeu, E., & Scarpa, J.A. (1998). Análisis químico del vino. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 451
CIREN (1997). Estudio Agrológico, VII Región. Descripciones de Suelos. Materiales y
452
Símbolos. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales. Santiago. Publicación N°
453
117. 660 p. Carrau, F.M., Medina, K., Farina, L., Boido, E., & Dellacassa, E. (2010). Effect of
455
Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculum size on wine fermentation aroma compounds
456
and its relation with assimilable nitrogen content. International Journal of Food
457
Microbiology, 143, 81–85.
RI PT
454
Choné, X., Lavigne-Cruège, V., Tominaga, T., Van Leeuwen, C., Castagnède, C.,
459
Saucier, C., & Dubourdieu, D. (2006). Effect of vine nitrogen status on grape
460
aromatic potential: flavor precursors (s-cysteine conjugates), glutathione and
461
phenolic content in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc grape juice. Journal
462
International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin. 40, 1-6.
M AN U
SC
458
Conradie, W.J. (2001). Timing of nitrogen fertilisation and the effect of poultrymanure
464
on the performance of grapevines on sandy soil. I. Soil analysis, grape yield and
465
vegetative growth. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 22, 52–68.
466
Gambuti, A., Han, G., Peterson, A. L., & Waterhouse, A. L. (2015). Sulfur dioxide and
467
glutathione alter the outcome of microoxygenation. American Journal of Enology
468
and Viticulture, 66, 411–423.
AC C
EP
TE D
463
469
Garde-Cerdán, T., & Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. (2008). Effect of the addition of different
470
quantities of amino acids to nitrogen-deficient must on the formation of esters,
471 472
alcohols, and acids during wine alcoholic fermentation. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 41, 501–510.
473
Garde-Cerdán, T., Lorenzo, C., Lara, J. F., Pardo, F., Ancín-Azpilicueta, C., & Salinas,
474
M. R. (2009). Study of the evolution of nitrogen compounds during grape ripening.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 475
Application to differentiate grape varieties and cultivated systems. Journal of
476
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 2410–2419. Garde-Cerdán, T., Martínez-Gil, A. M., Lorenzo, C., Lara, J. F., Pardo, F., & Salinas,
478
M. R. (2011). Implications of nitrogen compounds during alcoholic fermentation
479
from some grape varieties at different maturation stages and cultivation systems.
480
Food Chemistry, 124, 106–116.
RI PT
477
Garde-Cerdán, T., López, R., Portu, J., González-Arenzana, L., López-Alfaro, I., &
482
Santamaría, P. (2014). Study of the effects of proline, phenylalanine, and urea foliar
483
application to Tempranillo vineyards on grape amino acid content. Comparison with
484
commercial nitrogen fertilisers. Food Chemistry, 163, 136–141.
M AN U
SC
481
Geffroy, O., Dufourcq, T., López, R., Serrano, E., Gracia-Moreno, E., & Cacho, J.
486
(2012). Impact de pulvérsations foliaires azotées réalisées à la véraison sur
487
caractéristiques aromatiques des vins rouges. In Actas del coloquio international
488
sobre los aromas del vino. Proyecto VINAROMAS (pp. 87-89), Zaragoza, Spain.
489
Glories, Y., & Augustin, M. (1993). Maturité phénolique du raisin, consequences
490
technologiques: application aux millesimes 1991 et 1992. Compte Rendu Colloque
491
Journée Technique. Bordeaux, CIVB: 56–61.
EP
TE D
485
Hannam, K.D., Neilsen, G.H., Neilsen, D., Rabie, W.S., Midwood, A.J., & Millard, P.
493
(2013). Late-season foliar urea applications can increase berry yeast-assimilable
494 495
AC C
492
nitrogen in winegrapes (Vitis vinifera L.). American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 65, 89–95.
496
Hannam, K.D., Neilsen, G.H., Neilsen, D., Midwood, A.J., Millard, P., Zhang, Z., &
497
Steinke, D. (2016). Amino acid composition of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) juice in
498
response to applications of urea to the soil or foliage. American Journal of Enology
499
and Viticulture, 67, 47-55.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 500 501
Hernandez, A. (1997). Introducción al vino de Chile. Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Hernández-Orte, P., Cacho, J., & Ferreira, V. (2002). Relationship between varietal
503
amino acid profile of grapes and wine aromatic composition. Experiments with
504
model solutions and chemometric study. Journal of Agricultural and Food
505
Chemistry, 50, 2891–2899.
RI PT
502
Huang, Z., & Ough, C.S. (1989). Effect of vineyard locations, varieties and rootstocks
507
on the juice amino acid composition of several cultivars. American Journal of
508
Enology and Viticulture, 40, 135–139.
510 511 512
Huang, Z., & Ough, C.S. (1991). Amino acid profiles of commercial grape juices and
M AN U
509
SC
506
wines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 42, 261–267. Jamal, A., Moon, Y.S., & Abdin, M.Z. (2010). Sulphur -a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4, 523-529. Jiranek, V., Langridge, P., & Henschke, P.A. (1995). Amino acid and ammonium
514
utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts from a chemically defined
515
medium. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 46, 75–83.
517
Kritzinger, E.C., Bauer, F.F., & du Toit, W.J. (2013). Role of glutathione in
EP
516
TE D
513
winemaking: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61, 269-277. Lacroux, F., Tregoat, O., Van Leeuwen, C., Pons, A., Tominaga, T., Lavigne-Cruège,
519
V., & Dubourdieu, D. (2008). Effect of foliar nitrogen and sulphur application on
520 521
AC C
518
aromatic expression of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 42,125-132.
522
Lasa, B., Menendez, S., Sagastizabal, K., Cervantes, M. E. C., Irigoyen, I., Muro, J., &
523
Ariz, I. (2012). Foliar application of urea to “Sauvignon Blanc” and “Merlot” vines:
524
doses and time of application. Plant Growth Regulation, 67, 73–81.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 525
Linsenmeir, A.W., Loos, U., & Löhnertz, O. (2008). Must composition and nitrogen
526
uptake in a long-term trial as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization in a cool-
527
climate Riesling vineyard. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59, 255–
528
265. Löhnertz, O., Prior, B., Bleser, M., & Linsenmeier, A.. (1998). Einfluß von
530
weinbaulichen Maßnahmen auf die Aminosäuregehalte in Trauben und Mosten der
531
Sorte Riesling. In Proceedings of Intervitis Interfructa. 5. Internationales
532
Symposium:
533
Weinbereitung, pp. 1-23.
in
der
Kellerwirtschaft.
Mikroorganismen
und
SC
Innovationen
RI PT
529
Martínez-Gil, A.M., Garde-Cerdán, T., Lorenzo, C., Lara, J.F., Pardo, F., & Salinas, M.
535
R. (2012). Volatile compounds formation in alcoholic fermentation from grapes
536
collected at 2 maturation stages: Influence of nitrogen compounds and grape variety.
537
Journal of Food Science, 77, C71–C79.
540 541
TE D
539
Moreno-Arribas, M.V., & Polo, M.C. (2009). Wine chemistry and biochemistry (1st ed.). New York: Springer.
OIV (2003). Compendium of internationals methods of wine and must analysis. Paris: OIV.
EP
538
M AN U
534
Peña-Neira, A., Dueñas, M., Duarte, A., Hernandez, T., Estrella, I., & Loyola, E.
543
(2004). Effects of ripening stages and of plant vegetative vigor on the phenolic
544 545
AC C
542
composition of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon in the Maipo Valley (Chile). Vitis, 43, 51–57.
546
Portu, J., López-Alfaro, I., Gómez-Alonso, S., López, R., & Garde-Cerdán, T. (2015).
547
Changes on grape phenolic composition induced by grapevine foliar applications of
548
phenylalanine and urea. Food Chemistry, 180, 171−180.
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 549
Sörensen,
S.P.L.
(1907).
Enzymstudien
I:
Über
die
quantitative
Messung
550
proteolytischer Spaltungen, Die formoltitrierung. Biochemische Zeitschrift, 7, 45-
551
101. Spayd, S.E., & Andersen-Bagge, J. (1996). Free amino acid composition of grape juice
553
from 12 Vitis vinifera cultivars in Washington. American Journal of Enology and
554
Viticulture, 47, 389–402.
RI PT
552
Stines, A.P., Grubb, J., Gockowiak, H., Henschke, P.A., Hoj, P.B., & van Heeswijck, R.
556
(2000). Proline and arginine accumulation in developing berries of Vitis vinifera L.
557
in Australian vineyards: Influence of vine cultivar, berry maturity and tissue type.
558
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 6, 150–158.
M AN U
SC
555
Tea, I., Genter, T., Naulet, N., Lummerzheim, M., & Kleiber, D. (2007). Interaction
560
between nitrogen and sulfur by foliar application and its effects on flour bread-
561
making quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87, 2853–2859.
562
Ugliano, M., Kwiatkowski, M., Vidal, S., Capone, D., Siebert, T., Deval, J., Aagaard,
563
O., & Waters, E. (2011). Evolution of 3-mercaptohexanol, hidrogen sulfide, and
564
methyl mercaptan during bottle storage of Sauvignon blanc wines. Effect of
565
glutathione, cooper, oxygen exposure, and closure-derived oxygen. Journal of
566
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59, 2564-2572.
EP
TE D
559
Watson, T.G. (1976). Amino-acid pool composition of Saccharomyces cerevisae as a
568
function of growth rate and amino-acid nitrogen source. Journal of General
569
AC C
567
Microbiology, 96, 263–268.
570
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure captions
572
Figure 1. Amino acid concentration (mg/l) in musts from untreated, control (Ctr), and
573
treated vineyards with different foliar nitrogen applications such as urea (Ur), urea with
574
sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg), and two different commercial products, Nutrimyr Thiols
575
(NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA). a) Glutamic acid (Glu), Serine (Ser), Glutamine (Gln),
576
Histidine (His), Threonine (Thr), Arginine (Arg), Alanine (Ala), γ-aminobutyric acid
577
(GABA), Valine (Va) and Leucine (Leu). b) Aspartic acid (Asp), Asparagine (Asn),
578
Glycine (Gly), Tyrosine (Tyr), Cysteine (Cys), Methionine (Met), Tryptophan (Trp),
579
Phenylalanine (Phe), Isoleucine (Ile), Ornithine (Orn), and Lysine (Lys); All parameters
580
are given with the standard deviation (n = 3). For each amino acid, different letters
581
indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
571
582
Figure 2. Glutathione (GSH) concentration (mg/l) in musts from untreated, control
584
(Ctr), and treated vineyards with different foliar nitrogen applications such as urea (Ur),
585
urea with sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg), and two different commercial products,
586
Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA). All parameters are given with the
587
standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05)
588
between treatments.
EP
AC C
589
TE D
583
590
Figure 3. Principal components analysis (PCA) performed with all amino acids (mg/l)
591
and glutathione (mg/l) in Cabernet Sauvignon samples from untreated, control (Ctr),
592
and treated vineyards with different foliar nitrogen applications such as arginine (Arg),
593
urea (Ur), urea with sulphur (Ur+S) and two different commercial products, Nutrimyr
594
Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA).
595
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Ur
Ur+S
Arg
NT
BA
°Brix
24.77 ± 1.10 a
25.00 ± 0.46 a
24.33 ± 0.86 a
25.10 ± 0.44 a
24.10 ± 0.87 a
23.93 ± 0.81 a
pH
3.97 ± 0.09 a
3.88 ± 0.09 a
3.91 ± 0.08 a
4.01 ± 0.06 a
3.98 ± 0.06 a
3.94 ± 0.03 a
Total acidity (g/l)*
5.68 ± 0.01 a
5.83 ± 0.66 a
5.82 ± 0.32 a
5.87 ± 0.09 a
5.91 ± 0.02 a
5.77 ± 0.09 a
Easily extractable anthocyanins (mg/l)
519.75 ± 115.83 b
539.58 ± 14.88 b
389.08 ± 82.27 a
681.33 ± 11.65 c
535.50 ± 48.72 b
461.42 ± 17.88 ab
Total anthocyanins (mg/l)
934.50 ± 37.12 a
889.58 ± 51.63 a
824.25 ± 39.60 a
1260.00 ± 78.01 b
1162.58 ± 84.22 b
898.92 ± 119.43 a
TPI**
13.93 ± 2.90 ab
15.70 ± 1.90 bc
12.03 ± 1.16 a
17.83 ± 1.30 c
14.93 ± 0.64 abc
13.00 ± 2.63 ab
YAN (mg N/l)
251.33 ± 9.02 a
282.00 ± 5.29 d
260.67 ± 10.07 abc
266.67 ± 6.11 bc
270.67 ± 10.07 cd
253.00 ± 5.29 ab
Ammonium nitrogen (mg N/l)
158.38 ± 10.76 bc
199.71 ± 9.87 d
150.60 ± 10.90 b
178.36 ± 9.55 cd
154.38 ± 15.60 b
126.30 ± 14.64 a
Amino nitrogen (mg N/l)
360.36 ± 41.37 a
436.48 ± 8.58 bc
395.30 ± 42.78 ab
380.97 ± 12.50 ab
390.55 ± 56.03 ab
469.31 ± 31.95 c
Proline (mg/l)
2199.00 ± 291.95 a
2912.67 ± 2.06 b
2345.60 ± 317.37 ab
2406.76 ± 42.44 ab
2255.39 ± 362.75 ab
2817.42 ± 150.54ab
Amino nitrogen without proline (mg N/l)
92.95 ± 5.87 a
82.29 ± 8.33 a
110.07 ± 4.19 b
88.30 ± 7.34 a
116.29 ± 11.91 b
126.70 ± 13.65 b
TE D
M AN U
SC
Control
RI PT
Table 1. Oenological parameters, and nitrogen fractions including proline concentration in must from untreated (Control) and treated grapevines with different nitrogen sources as foliar fertilizer: urea (Ur), urea with sulphur (Ur+S), arginine (Arg), and different commercial products Nutrimyr Thiols (NT) and Basfoliar Algae (BA).
≤ 0.05) between treatments. *Expressed as g/l tartaric acid.
AC C
EP
All parameters are given with their standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p **TPI: total polyphenol index.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 1
RI PT
a) 180
c
160
SC
bc
140
b
a
mg/l
100
80
60
b
a a
20
b
b a
a
b
d
cd
bc a
ab
0
Ser
Gln
a a a a a a
AC C
Glu
e
EP
b
b
TE D
c c
40
a
a
a
M AN U
120
bc
c
a
His
Ur
a
a
d
ab
cd
Ur+S
c
bc
d
c
abc
b a
Thr Ctr
a a a
Arg Arg
NT
Ala
GABA
ab
bc a c c
Val
ab
ab
bc a c bc
Leu
BA
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
RI PT
b) 12,00
c
c
a a a a a
b
a
b
8,00
a a
a
a
a
a
a
c abc bc abc ab a
4,00
b ab
c
c
ab
0,00
ab a
a
Tyr
Cys
Ctr
Ur
Ur+S
a
a
c
a
b
Met Arg
a a ab a
Trp NT
Phe
Ile
Orn
b
a a a a a
ab
Lys
BA
EP
Gly
TE D
2,00
Asn
ab
a a a a a a
ab b a
Asp
ab
ab ab
M AN U
a
abab ab
b
AC C
mg/l
b 6,00
SC
10,00
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 2
RI PT
50
c 45
SC
40 35
b
b
M AN U
25 20 15 10
a
a
Ctr
Ur
TE D
5
a
Ur+S
Arg
EP
0
NT
BA
Glutathione
AC C
mg/l
30
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 3
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Study of foliar N application to Cabernet Sauvignon (Pro accumulator variety) vines Sulphur+urea treatment improved grape N assimilation respect to urea application Commercial N sprays improved must amino acid content Arginine treatment increased the content of polyphenols
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Foliar N application with organic sources increased the glutathione content