Effect of exogenous melatonin on in vivo and in vitro prostaglandin secretion in Rasa Aragonesa ewes

Effect of exogenous melatonin on in vivo and in vitro prostaglandin secretion in Rasa Aragonesa ewes

Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355 Effect of exogenous melatonin on in vivo and in vitro prostaglandin secretion in Rasa Aragonesa ewes Jose´-Alfonso...

145KB Sizes 10 Downloads 95 Views

Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

Effect of exogenous melatonin on in vivo and in vitro prostaglandin secretion in Rasa Aragonesa ewes Jose´-Alfonso Abeciaa,*, Fernando Forcadaa, Jose´-Antonio Valaresa, Olga Zu´n˜igaa, Hans Kindahlb a

Department of Animal Production and Food Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SLU, Box 7039, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden

Received 21 October 2002; received in revised form 7 April 2003; accepted 8 April 2003

Abstract The effect of exogenous melatonin on prostaglandin secretion was measured on Rasa Aragonesa ewes. Fourteen ewes received an 18 mg melatonin implant (Mþ) on 10 April and were compared with 13 control animals (without implants M). Twenty days later, intravaginal pessaries were inserted in all animals to induce a synchronized oestrus (day 0). On day 14, ewes were injected, i.v., with 0.5 IU oxytocin. Plasma 15-ketodihydro-PGF2a (PGFM) concentrations were measured to assess uterine secretory responsiveness to oxytocin. After euthanasia, pieces of endometrium were collected to determine progesterone content and PGE2 and PGF2a secretion in vitro, in the presence or absence of either 20 mg/ml recombinant ovine interferon-tau (roIFNt) or 1 nmol/l oxytocin in the medium. Endometrial progesterone content was similar in the two treatments (Mþ: 50:25  17:34 ng/mg tissue, M: 43:08  11:21 ng/mg tissue). Mþ ewes that responded to oxytocin had significantly higher plasma PGFM concentrations between 10 and 80 min after oxytocin administration, a higher mean PGFM peak (P < 0:001), higher plasma PGFM levels after the challenge (P < 0:05) and higher plasma progesterone concentrations (P < 0:01) than control ewes. In the in vitro experiment, Mþ and M control samples secreted similar amounts of PGE2. The presence of roIFNt and oxytocin only stimulated PGE2 production (P < 0:05) in M tissues. Control Mþ tissues secreted higher amounts of PGF2a (P ¼ 0:07) and PGF2a secretion was significantly (P < 0:01) stimulated by roIFNt. Oxytocin produced this effect only in M samples (P < 0:01). In conclusion, although previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of melatonin on lamb production, PGF2a secretion is higher in vitro and the PGE2:PGF2a ratio is unfavourable in response to

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ34-976761000; fax: þ34-976761612. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Abecia).

0093-691X/$ – see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00168-7

1346

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

IFNt, which could affect embryo survival. Whether or not these mechanisms are similar in pregnant ewes remains to be elucidated. # 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Sheep; Melatonin; Prostaglandins

1. Introduction Sexual activity in sheep is mainly affected by photoperiod. Changes in day length are conveyed to the reproductive neuroendocrine axis by melatonin [1]. Subcutaneous implants with this hormone are commonly used to advance the breeding season in sheep [2–4]. The implants increase melatonin concentration over a 24-h period, causing a short day-like response without suppressing the endogenous rhythm of secretion [5,6]. About 40–60 days after treatment the pulse frequency of LH and GnRH are increased [7]. Melatonin treatment affects the reproductive physiology of the ewe at the central level as well as other physiological processes, including an increased ovulation rate [8,9], an annual rhythm of luteal secretion of progesterone and improved luteal function [10]. In fact, melatonin receptors have been found in human granulosa cells [11]. Melatonin also stimulates progesterone secretion by luteal tissue both in vitro and in vivo [12–14]. In a previous study, our group has shown that plasma progesterone concentration increases following a melatonin challenge [15]. Melatonin could also affect fertility rate by provoking changes in embryo development or maternal pregnancy recognition (MPR) mechanisms. We observed that in vitro embryo development improved in the presence of melatonin [15]. However, in an embryo transfer program, McEvoy et al. [16] did not find more embryos in melatonin-treated donor ewes. It is unclear whether melatonin has a direct effect on the MPR system in sheep. The main modulators of these mechanisms are prostaglandin (PG) secretion from the uterus and interferon-tau (IFNt) from the embryo. In rats, melatonin appears to regulate prostaglandins produced by the uterus and hypothalamus [17] and inhibit spontaneous and oxytocininduced contractions of the myometrium [18]. In ruminants, oestrus is brought about by the luteolytic action of PGF2a, after it is released by the endometrium at the end of the cycle [19]. This mechanism can be blocked by the presence of an embryo (10–21 days old), which inhibits the endometrial oestrogen receptor by the production of IFNt, prevents an increase in oxytocin receptors and suppresses the pulsatile release of PGF2a by oxytocin [20]. In contrast to PGF2a, PGE2 has a luteoprotective action that is either luteotrophic or antiluteolytic [21]. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of melatonin on prostaglandin secretion and how this may alter the luteolytic mechanisms.

2. Material and methods The study was carried out at the experimental farm of the University of Zaragoza, Spain (latitude 418 400 N), which meets the requirements of the European Community

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

1347

Commission (1986) for Scientific Procedure Establishments. All protocols were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of University of Zaragoza. 2.1. Animals We used 27 non-pregnant Rasa Aragonesa ewes with a mean (S.E.M.) live weight of 68:2  1:7 kg and a mean body condition score [22] of 3:38  0:06. On 10 April, 14 ewes (group Mþ) received a single implant at the base of the left ear containing 18 mg melatonin (Melovine, CEVA Salud Animal, Spain). The remaining animals (group M, n ¼ 13) were not implanted. Animals were housed in communal yards with an uncovered area and fed a concentrate ration and barley straw at rates designed to provide their maintenance requirements. Fresh, clean water was available at all times. 2.2. Experimental procedures To determine ovarian activity at the time of implantation, blood samples were collected into heparin coated tubes on 3 and 7 April, and assayed for progesterone. Ewes were deemed cyclic if their plasma progesterone concentrations were greater than 0.5 ng/ml, which indicates the presence of a corpus luteum in this breed [23]. Twenty days after melatonin implantation, intravaginal pessaries containing 30 mg of FGA (Chronogest, Intervet, Spain) were inserted in all animals. The pessaries were withdrawn 12 days after insertion, after which 300 UI eCG (Intervet, Spain) were injected intramuscularly. Estrus (day 0) was detected using vasectomized rams. Thereafter, blood samples were collected daily and assayed for progesterone. On day 14, ewes were challenged with 0.5 IU oxytocin (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) in 1 ml saline. Plasma concentrations of 15-ketodihydro-PGF2a (PGFM, the main metabolite of PGF2a) were measured in blood samples collected at 15 min intervals for 1 h before the injection of oxytocin and then at 10 min intervals for 2 h after the challenge. Four hours after the end of the bleeding period, ewes were euthanized (Euta-Lener, Normon, Spain), and pieces of endometrium were collected from the body of the uterus ipsilateral to the ovulating ovary. Samples were either stored at 20 8C until the determination of progesterone content or cultured to determine prostaglandin secretion in vitro. The numbers of corpora lutea on each ovary were also recorded. 2.3. Endometrial progesterone content Uterine progesterone concentrations were determined using the technique described by Abecia et al. [24]. Endometrial tissue samples (500 mg) were homogenized in 10 ml isotonic buffer (102.5 g/l sucrose, 0.375 g/l EDTA, 1.825 g/l Tris, pH 7.4), and the supernatant was removed after centrifugation at 1000  g for 10 min. Progesterone was extracted four times from 1 ml supernatant, using 2 ml diethyl ether each time. The pooled extracts were then assayed to determine progesterone concentration. The proportion of progesterone recovered was estimated by measuring the recovery of 125 I-progesterone added to the homogenate. The appropriate correction factor was applied to the measured concentrations.

1348

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

2.4. Endometrial tissue incubation Pieces of endometrial tissue (500 mg) were placed in individual wells of a 24-well tissue culture plate containing 500 ml of cell culture medium, and incubated in duplicate for 24 h at 37 8C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in either control medium or medium containing either 20 mg/ml recombinant ovine interferon-tau (roIFNt) or 1 nmol/l oxytocin. The cell culture medium consisted of Ham’s F-12 medium supplemented with antibiotics, L-glutamine (0.29 mg/ml), insulin (5 mg/ml), transferrin (5 mg/ml) and selenium (5 ng/ml) [25]. The roIFNt was provided by Dr. Nicole Cheˆ ne (INRA Jouy-en-Josas, France), produced and purified as described in Ref. [26]. Its antiviral activity was 0:8  108 IU/ml, using MDBK cells and vesicular stomatitis virus. After culture, the medium was collected and stored at 20 8C until analysis to determine prostaglandin concentrations. 2.5. PGFM determination 15-Ketodihydro-PGF2a concentrations were determined in duplicate by radioimmunoassay of plasma samples using the antibody and the technique described by Granstro¨ m and Kindahl [27]. The sensitivity of the method was 60 pmol/l. The intra-assay coefficients of variation ranged between 6.6 and 11.7% for the different ranges of the standard curve. The inter-assay coefficient of variation was 14%. 2.6. Prostaglandin determination Culture media from wells were analysed using prostaglandin enzyme immunoassay kits (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, USA), to determine PGE2 and PGF2a concentrations. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 2.5 and 2.3% and 2.4 and 10%, for PGE2 and PGF2a, respectively. 2.7. Progesterone determination Progesterone was determined using solid-phase RIA kits based on antibody coated tubes, 125 I-labelled progesterone and rabbit antiserum (CIS bio international, Gif-surYvette, France). The assay sensitivity was 0.05 ng/ml. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 13.6 and 15.7%, respectively. All material employed for tissue cultures was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). 2.8. Statistical analysis A PGFM response was defined as an increase at two successive points during the posttreatment period above the mean þ 2 S.D. values of the pre-treatment period. Peak height (PGFM peak) was defined as the greatest increase recorded during the post-treatment period after subtracting the initial baseline to account for basal differences among ewes. An analysis of variance was applied to compare PGFM peak, and pre- and post-treatment PGFM concentrations between groups, excluding data from ewes which did not respond to oxytocin.

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

1349

The main effects of melatonin treatment on prostaglandin secretion in vitro and plasma and endometrial progesterone concentrations were compared by an analysis of variance. Ovulation rate was compared using a Chi-square test. A paired t-test was used to compare prostaglandin concentrations in the treated and control media after incubation with roIFNt or 1 nmol/l oxytocin.

3. Results According to the concentrations of plasma progesterone before melatonin treatment, a mean of 26% of the ewes exhibited ovarian cyclicity, with no differences between groups. The mean ovulation rate was similar in both groups (Mþ: 2:29  0:22, M: 2:15  0:32). During the luteal phase (days 5–14), plasma progesterone was higher in Mþ ewes but not significantly different than controls (Fig. 1). However, the overall mean level throughout the experiment was significantly higher in treated ewes (Mþ: 1:06  0:13 ng/ml, M: 0:75  0:09 ng/ml, P ¼ 0:05). There were no significant differences in the progesterone content of endometrial tissue (Mþ: 50:25  17:34 ng/mg tissue, M: 43:08  11:21 ng/mg tissue, NS). The number of ewes with a PGFM response to oxytocin challenge was similar in both groups (Mþ: 7/13, M: 6/14). Plasma concentrations of PGFM were similar between groups prior to oxytocin challenge (Table 1) but increased rapidly in Mþ approximately 10–80 min after oxytocin administration (P < 0:05, Fig. 2). Mþ ewes had significantly higher mean PGFM peak height (P < 0:001) and mean plasma PGFM (P < 0:05) after the challenge (Table 1). Mþ ewes had significantly higher (P < 0:01) concentrations of plasma progesterone between day 10 and 14, among the ewes in both groups that responded to the oxytocin challenge throughout the cycle (Fig. 3). PGE2 secretion by the control tissue was similar in incubates from Mþ and M samples. However, IFNt and oxytocin stimulated the production of PGE2 relative to controls only in tissues collected from M ewes (P < 0:05, Fig. 4). PGF2a concentrations were higher in

Fig. 1. Plasma progesterone (P4) concentration throughout the oestrous cycle of ewes with (Mþ) or without (M) exogenous melatonin implants.

1350

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

Table 1 Mean (S.E.M.) plasma PGFM concentrations (pmol/l) before and after oxytocin challenge on day 14 of the oestrous cycle, mean PGFM peak and time (min) of PGFM peak of ewes treated (Mþ) or not (M) with exogenous melatonin (ewes responding to the challenge) Mþ Before After Peak Peak time

453 748 553 28

M    

82 (456  118) 150 (552  54) 54 7

360 329 130 53

Significance    

60 (246  42) 53 (130  30) 30 14

NS P < 0.05 (P < 0.0001) P < 0.001 NS

Fig. 2. Mean (S.E.M) plasma concentration of PGFM before and after oxytocin challenge on day 14 of the oestrous cycle in ewes that responded to oxytocin administration, with (Mþ) or without (M) exogenous melatonin (P < 0:05, P < 0:01, P < 0:001).

Fig. 3. Plasma progesterone (P4) concentration throughout the oestrous cycle in ewes that responded to an oxytocin challenge on day 14 (with (Mþ) or without (M) exogenous melatonin, P < 0:01).

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

1351

Fig. 4. Mean (S.E.M) PGE2 and PGF2a concentration and PGE2:PGF2a ratio in the culture medium after incubation of endometrial samples in ewes with (Mþ) or without (M) exogenous melatonin, collected on day 14 of the oestrous cycle, after incubation in medium (control), medium with 20 mg/ml roIFNt or medium with 1 nmol oxytocin/l. Different letters indicate differences within groups of at least P < 0:05, (P < 0:05 and  P < 0:01).

control tissues Mþ ewes (P ¼ 0:07) and PGF2a secretion was significantly (P < 0:01) stimulated by roIFNt. Oxytocin produced the same effect in M samples (P < 0:01). As a result of the different patterns of secretion the PGE2:PGF2a ratio was significantly higher in the M ewes after incubation with IFNt (P < 0:05).

4. Discussion The melatonin-treated ewes (Mþ) appeared to produce more PGF2a than control ewes both in vivo (after an oxytocin challenge) and in vitro (with or without IFNt in the culture medium). Since the oxytocin-induced PGFM response in OVX ewes is under the

1352

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

quantitative control of progesterone and estradiol, ewes that do not respond to the challenge probably had an abnormal secretion of these hormones [28]. In early pregnancy, ewes with a high estradiol:progesterone ratio may generate larger PGF2a episodes, which increases the risk of failure of the maternal recognition of pregnancy. Moreover, progesterone treatment in OVX ewes substantially increases the concentration of PGF2a in uterine venous plasma and the PGFM response [29]. In this experiment, melatonin-treated ewes which responded to oxytocin had higher plasma progesterone than the controls that also responded to oxytocin. The progesterone concentrations were considerably higher compared with normal levels in this breed at the same time in the estrous cycle [30,31]. Recently, we have shown that intravenous injection of melatonin has an effect on progesterone secretion [15]. Wallace et al. [32] observed higher peripheral progesterone concentrations on days 7 and 12 of the cycle in melatonin-treated ewes compared to naturally ovulating control animals. Further evidence supporting a direct effect of melatonin on progesterone production has been obtained with studies involving sheep [33], cattle [13] and humans [13,14], and melatonin receptors have been found in human granulosa cells [11]. Thus, the higher secretion of PGFM by Mþ ewes after the oxytocin challenge could be mediated indirectly by a higher production of progesterone instead of through a direct effect of melatonin on endometrial cells. Progesterone probably induces responsiveness to oxytocin by up regulating the post-receptor signalling pathways and/or enzyme involved in prostaglandin synthesis [29]. In fact, progesterone can increase the number of oxytocin receptors [34] and up-regulate COX-2 expression, which in turn increases the capacity of prostaglandin synthesis [35]. Thus, the elevated plasma progesterone concentrations caused by melatonin could be sufficient to strongly modulate oxytocin receptors and prostaglandin enzymes. The regulation of receptors in endometrial tissue could also be similar since their progesterone content was homogeneous. Estradiol concentration has also been correlated with the mean response of PGFM to oxytocin, via the estrogenic stimulation of uterine oxytocin receptors [36]. We could not confirm the role of estradiol in the response to oxytocin in Mþ ewes since plasma estradiol concentrations were not determined. On the other hand, a faster increase in PGFM may reflect a faster release of PGF2a or a greater rate of metabolism of PGF2a to PGFM [29]. In ruminants, photoperiod regulates sexual activity as well as other physiological processes, including basal metabolism. Short days induce a higher rate of tissue metabolism and increased lipolytic activity [37]. The photoperiodic signal provided by melatonin implants causes a short-day-like response [5,6]. Therefore, perhaps the higher and faster response to oxytocin in Mþ ewes in terms of plasma PGFM concentration reflects differences in PGF2a metabolism rather than PGF2a secretion. However, the in vitro results seem to confirm the effects on secretion in vivo, indicating that other mechanisms should be considered. Most of the information on in vitro prostaglandin production in the presence of both roIFNt and oxytocin is based on bovine tissue. The results depend on the origin of the cultured tissue and the culture techniques. Since we used endometrial explants, we could not distinguish between epithelial or stromal endometrial cells. Samples from Mþ ewes produced more PGF2a (P ¼ 0:07) than controls (M), especially with roIFNt in the culture medium (P < 0:01). However, basal secretion of PGE2 was similar between groups. Adding roIFNt only increased PGE2 in the endometrium in control ewes. In

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

1353

cultured ovine endometrial cells, oIFNt attenuates release of both PGE2 and PGF2a, suggesting a direct or indirect action of interferons on the prostaglandin synthase enzyme which converts arachidonic acid to the endoperoxide intermediate (PGH2) [38]. Moreover, bovine IFNt suppresses secretion of PGE2 and PGF2a from the bovine endometrium in vitro [39]. However, Asselin et al. [40] demonstrated that IFNt triggers an important increase of PGE2 by bovine endometrial cells via upregulation of COX-2 gene expression. These authors [41] also observed that roIFNt increases the PGE2:PGF2a ratio, preferentially in the caruncular zone of the bovine endometrium. Thus, at the cellular level, the relative production of PGE2 and PGF2a in vitro may give an indication of the direction of the response at pregnancy recognition in vivo. An increase may indicate a luteoprotective response whereas a reduction may indicate a luteolytic response. We only observed a greater PGE2:PGF2a ratio in the presence of roIFNt in explants from control ewes (significantly higher than the Mþ group). In the presence of oxytocin, there were no differences between groups but PGE2 and PGF2a secretion increased significantly in cultures from untreated ewes compared to control cultures. Oxytocin seems to increase PGE2 and PGF2a secretion in vitro by epithelial cells [39,41,42], with COX-2 being involved in the oxytocin regulation of PGF2a production in the endometrium [42]. However, as concluded by Charpigny et al. [43], the physiological significance of these in vitro experiments could be questionable since the tissues probably do not maintain their normal cellular function in culture. In conclusion, the increase in litter size brought about by melatonin implants occurs despite higher PGF2a secretion in vitro and an unfavourable PGE2:PGF2a ratio in response to IFNt, which could be detrimental for embryo survival. First, it is possible that the positive effect of melatonin on ovulation rate [8,9] or on embryo survival [15] could compensate for the negative effect on prostaglandin secretion, resulting in a higher number of lambs born per treated ewe. Second, the prostaglandin secretion in treated ewes could be lower than the necessary threshold to induce luteolysis. Whether or not these mechanisms are similar in pregnant ewes and the effect of melatonin on IFNt secretion remains to be elucidated.

Acknowledgements This study was supported by grant AGF98-0575 and AGF2001-1817 from CICYT (Spain). J.A. Valares is grateful to DGA (Spain) for a pre-doctoral grant. The authors would like to thank Dr. Alex Martino (CEVA Salud Animal, Spain) and Dr. Nicole Cheˆ ne (INRA, France) for generously donating melatonin implants and roIFNt, respectively. References [1] Bittman EL, Karsch FJ, Hopkins JW. Role of the pineal gland in ovine photoperiodism: regulation of seasonal breeding and negative feedback effects of estradiol upon luteinizing hormone secretion. Endocrinology 1983;113:329–36. [2] Koumitzis SA, Belibasaki S, Doney JM. Melatonin advances and condenses the onset of seasonal breeding in Greek dairy ewes. Anim Prod 1989;48:399–405.

1354

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

[3] McMillan WH, Sealey RC. Do melatonin implants influence the breeding season in Coopworth ewes? Proc NZ Soc Anim Prod 1989;49:43–6. [4] Haresign W, Peters AR, Staples LD. The effect of melatonin implants on breeding activity and litter size in commercial sheep flocks in the UK. Anim Prod 1990;50:111–21. [5] Malpaux B, Viguie´ C, Skinner DC, Thie´ ry JC, Chemineau P. Control of the circannual rhythm of reproduction by melatonin in the ewe. Brain Res Bull 1997;44:431–8. [6] O’Callaghan D, Karsch FJ, Boland MP, Roche JF. What photoperiodic signal is provided by a continuousrelease melatonin implant? Biol Reprod 1991;45:927–33. [7] Viguie´ C, Thibault J, Thie´ ry JC, Tillet Y, Malpaux B. Characterization of the short day-induced decrease in median eminence tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the ewe: temporal relationship with the changes in LH and prolactin secretion and short day-like effect of melatonin. Endocrinology 1997;138:499–506. [8] Forcada F, Zarazaga L, Abecia JA. Effect of exogenous melatonin and plane of nutrition after weaning on estrous activity, endocrine status and ovulation rate in Salz ewes lambing in the seasonal anoestrus. Theriogenology 1995;43:1179–93. [9] Rondo´ n Z, Forcada F, Zarazaga L, Abecia JA, Lozano JM. Oestrus activity, ovulation rate and plasma melatonin concentrations in Rasa Aragonesa ewes maintained at two different and constant body condition score levels and implanted or reimplanted with melatonin. Anim Reprod Sci 1996;41:225–36. [10] Asworth CJ, Sales DI, Wilmut I. Evidence of an association between the survival of embryos and the periovulatory plasma progesterone concentration in the ewe. J Reprod Fertil 1989;87:23–32. [11] Yie SM, Niles LP, Younglai EV. Melatonin receptors on human granulosa cell membranes. J Clin Endocr Metab 1995;80:1747–9. [12] Durotoye LA, Argo CM, McNeil ME, Graham NB, Rodway RG. Early lambing and increased lambing percentage with slow-release hydrogel melatonin implants. J Reprod Fertil Abstr Ser 1985;1:83. [13] Webley GE, Luck MR. Melatonin directly stimulates the secretion of progesterone by human and bovine granulosa cells in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1986;78:711–7. [14] Webley GE, Luck MR, Hearn JP. Stimulation of progesterone secretion by cultured human granulosa cells with melatonin and catecholamines. J Reprod Fertil 1988;84:669–77. [15] Abecia JA, Forcada F, Zu´ n˜ iga O. The effect of melatonin on the secretion of progesterone in sheep and on the development of ovine embryos in vitro. Vet Res Commun 2002;26:151–8. [16] McEvoy TG, Robinson JJ, Aitken RP, Robertson IS. Melatonin treatments of embryo donor and recipient ewes during anestrus affects their endocrine status, but not ovulation rate, embryo survival or pregnancy. Theriogenology 1998;49:943–55. [17] Gimeno MF, Landa A, Sterin-Speziale N, Cardinali DP, Gimeno AL. Melatonin blocks in vitro generation of prostaglandin by the uterus and hypothalamus. Eur J Pharmacol 1980;62:309–17. [18] Aynar A, Kutlu S, Yilmaz B, Kelestimur H. Melatonin inhibits spontaneous and ocytocin-induced contractions of rat myometrium in vitro. Neuroendocrinol Lett 2001;22:199–207. [19] Silvia WJ, Lewis GS, McCracken JA, Thatcher WW, Wilson JR. Hormonal regulation of uterine secretion of prostaglandin F2a during luteolysis in ruminants. Biol Reprod 1991;45:655–63. [20] Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Ott TL. Placental interferons. Am J Reprod Immunol 1996;35:297–308. [21] Pratt BR, Butcher RL, Inskeep EK. Antiluteolytic effect of the conceptus and of PGE2 in ewes. J Anim Sci 1977;45:784–91. [22] Russel AJF, Doney JM, Gunn RG. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J Agric Sci Camb 1969;72:451–4. [23] Forcada F, Abecia JA, Sierra I. Seasonal changes in oestrous activity and ovulation rate in Rasa Aragonesa ewes maintained at two different body condition levels. Small Rum Res 1992;8:313–24. [24] Abecia JA, Rhind SM, Goddard PJ, McMillen SR, Ahmadi S, Elston DA. Jugular and ovarian venous profiles of progesterone and associated endometrial progesterone concentrations in pregnant and nonpregnant ewes. Anim Sci 1996;63:229–34. [25] Thibodeaux JK, Broussard JR, Godke RA, Hansel W. Stimulation of progesterone production by bovine luteal cells by co-incubation with bovine blastocyst-stage embryos or trophoblastic vesicles. J Reprod Fertil 1994;10:657–62. [26] Martal J, Degryse E, Charpigny G, Assal N, Reinaud P, Charlier M, et al. Evidence for extended maintenance of the corpus luteum by uterine infusion of a recombinant trophoblast a-interferon (trophoblastin) in sheep. J Endocrinol 1990;127:R5–8.

J. Abecia et al. / Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1345–1355

1355

[27] Granstro¨ m E, Kindahl H. Radioimmunoassay of the major metabolite of PGF2a, 15-keto-13,14-dihydroPGF2a. Method Enzymol 1982;86:320–39. [28] Beard AP, Hunter MG, Lamming GE. Quantitative control of oxytocin-induced PGF2a release by progesterone and oestradiol in ewes. J Reprod Fertil 1994;100:143–50. [29] Mann GE, Payne JH, Lamming GE. Hormonal regulation of oxytocin-induced prostaglandin F2a secretion by the bovine and ovine uterus in vivo. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2001;21:127–41. [30] Lozano JM, Abecia JA, Forcada F, Zarazaga L, Alfaro B. Effect of undernutrition on the distribution of progesterone in the uterus of ewes during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 1998; 49:539–46. [31] Abecia JA, Forcada F, Lozano JM. A preliminary report on the effect of dietary energy on prostaglandin F2a production in vitro, interferon-tau synthesis by the conceptus, endometrial progesterone concentration on days 9 and 15 of pregnancy and associated rates of embryo wastage in ewes. Theriogenology 1999;52:1203–13. [32] Wallace JM, Robinson JJ, Wigzell S, Aitken RP. Effects of melatonin on the peripheral concentrations of LH and progesterone after oestrus, and on conception rate in ewes. J Endocrinol 1988;119:523–30. [33] Durotoye LA, Webley GE, Rodway RG. Stimulation of the production of progesterone by the corpus luteum of the ewe by the perfusion of melatonin in vivo and by treatment of granulosa cells with melatonin in vitro. Res Vet Sci 1997;62:87–91. [34] Vallet JL, Lamming GE, Batten M. Control of endometrial oxytocin receptor and uterine response to oxytocin by progesterone and estradiol in ewe. J Reprod Fertil 1990;90:625–34. [35] Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Tamby J-P, Cre´ minon C, Martal J, Maclouf J, et al. Expresio´ n of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in ovine endometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Endocrinology 1997;138:2163–71. [36] Beard AP, Lamming GE. Oestradiol concentration and the development of the uterine oxytocin receptor and oxytocin-induced PGF2a release in ewes. J Reprod Fertil 1994;100:469–75. [37] Faulconnier Y, Bonnet M, Bocquier F, Leroux C, Hocquette JF, Martin P, et al. Re´ gulation du me´ tabolisme lipidique des tissus adipeux et musculaires chez le ruminant. Effets du niveau alimentaire et de la photope´ riode. Prod Anim 1999;12:287–300. [38] Salamonsen LA, Manikhot J, Healy DL, Findlay JK. Ovine trophoblast protein-1 and human interferon alpha reduce prostaglandin synthesis by ovine endometrial cells. Prostaglandins 1989;38:289–306. [39] Danet-Desnoyers G, Wetzels C, Thatcher WW. Natural and recombinant bovine interferon t regulate basal and oxytocin-induced secretion of prostaglandins F2a and E2 by epithelial cells and stromal cells in the endometrium. Reprod Fertil Dev 1994;6:193–202. [40] Asselin E, Bazer FW, Fortier MA. Recombinant ovine and bovine interferons tau regulate prostaglandin production and oxytocin response in cultured bovine endometrial cells. Biol Reprod 1997;56:402–8. [41] Asselin E, Drolet P, Fortier MA. In vitro response to oxytocin and interferon-tau in bovine endometrial cells from caruncular and intercaruncular areas. Biol Reprod 1998;59:241–7. [42] Asselin E, Drolet P, Fortier MA. Cellular mechanisms involved during oxytocin-induced prostaglandin F2a production in endometrial epithelial cells in vitro: role of cyclooxygenase-2. Endocrinology 1997; 138:4798–805. [43] Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Cre´ minon C, Tamby J-P. Correlation of increased concentration of ovine endometrial cyclooxygenase 2 with the increase in PGE2 and PGD2 in the late luteal phase. J Reprod Fertil 1999;117:315–24.