Chemospher¢, Vol.24, No.12, pp 2001-2007, 1992 Printed in Great Britain
EFFECT
OF M E T A B O L I S M
GEOMETRIC
MITSUGU
0045-6535/92 $5.00 + 0.00 Pergamon Press Ltd.
ISOMERS
MIYAMOTO,
ON B I O C O N C E N T R A T I O N
OF d - P H E N O T H R I N
SHOJI
SAITO*,
AND MASATOSHI
Environmental
Health
Sumitomo 4-2-I,
Takatsukasa,
YOSHIYUKI
TAKIMOTO,
MATSUO
Science
Chemical
OF
IN FISH
Laboratory,
Co.,
Takarazuka,
Ltd. Hyogo,
665 Japan
ABSTRACT
Yearling mixture
carp
(Cyprinus
of d-cis
piperonyl
evaluated.
under
factors
higher
subsequent
in e l e v a t e d
BCF's was o b s e r v e d presumably oxidative
2.3-11.
metabolism
Thus,
bioconcentration
that
in the a b s e n c e
isomer.
to a r e d u c e d
to the e l i m i n a t i o n
isomer
rate
for the d-trans
The e l e v a t i o n caused isomer.
constant
explained
butoxide
were isomer
resulted
change
observed
in
here was
by i n h i b i t e d The c o n t r i b u t i o n
of
(K3/K 2) was e s t i m a t e d
to
by a d i s t i n c t
and a s i g n i f i c a n c e
separately
isomer
but no r e m a r k a b l e
to the d-cis
the r e s u l t was well
were
for the d-cis
elimination
of
and the
isomers
of p i p e r o n y l
isomer,
(a 1:4
and the p r e s e n c e
condition
than those
in the p r e s e n c e
for the d-cis
phenomenon
test
BCF values
to 2 . 2 - f o l d
characteristic
of the d-cis
to d - p h e n o t h r i n
of the g e o m e t r i c
for the d-trans
reactions
biotransformation be
(BCF's)
by 1.1
attributable
exposed
the f l o w - t h r o u g h
exposure
BCF values
were
isomers)
It was d e m o n s t r a t e d
significantly and the
and d-trans
butoxide
bioconcentration
carpio)
oxidative
of m e t a b o l i s m
in
was e x e m p l i f i e d .
INTRODUCTION
Biotransformations rates
that
their
of x e n o b i o t i c s
bioconcentrations
in fish, are
in some cases,
significantly
2001
occur
e f f e c t e d 1,2)
at such
2002
In this
study,
d-phenothrin
to clarify
in carp,
of the c o m p o u n d
whose
the effect
bioconcentration metabolic
factors
pathway
to one a n o t h e r 3) were
separately
of p i p e r o n y l
which
butoxide
of m e t a b o l i s m
on b i o c o n c e n t r a t i o n
(BCF's)
and rates
of g e o m e t r i c
are
remarkably
measured, in the absence
is well
known
MATERIALS
AND
of
isomers
different
and the p r e s e n c e
as an i n h i b i t o r
of m i c r o s o m a l
m o n o o x y g e n a s e 4)
METHODS
Chemicals d-Phenothrin purity was
93.5%)
was used
96.3% when
(IR)-cis,trans-chrysanthemate)(chemical
(3-phenoxybenzyl as a test
determined
by HPLC
with h e x a n e / 1 , 2 - d i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1:4 when
determined
Piperonyl
butoxide,
Pure
Chemical
The optical
(Shimadzu
(Shimadzu
reagents
LC-6A,
purity
Sumipax
of IR isomer
0A-2000
The d-cis:d-trans isomer
(500/I)).
by G C - F I D other
compound.
GC-9A,
QF-I
and solvents
capillary
column ratio was
column).
were p u r c h a s e d
from Wako
Co.,Ltd.
Exposure Exposure
was c o n d u c t e d
guideline,
No.
corresponding isomers,
to 0.86
or 0 . 0 8 6 p p b prepared
was i n t r o d u c e d
exposure,
The renewal
fish and water
To clarify experiment presence
the effect
of d - p h e n o t h r i n
and
with
oil
samples
set at 14.4 were
of m e t a b o l i s m
at 0.43ppb of d - p h e n o t h r i n
of 1.0ppm of p i p e r o n y l
(Nikko
3% mean
Chemical) where lipid
times/day.
taken at the
butoxide
20 y e a r l i n g
specified
similar
8 weeks
intervals.
another
conditions
was c o n d u c t e d
as an
content 6)) were
During
on b i o c o n c e n t r a t i o n , under
test
solution,
aquarium,
20g body weight,
rate was
in the OECD
of d-cis and d-trans
3.4 or 0.34ppb caster
into a 100-L glass
(Cyprinus carpio, about
maintained.
way as d e s c r i b e d
4.3 or 0.43ppb
respectively,
emulsifier carp
305C5):
in a dynamic
for
exposure
but in the
4 weeks.
Analysis Each g e o m e t r i c QP-1000, (fragment
QF-I
was q u a n t i f i e d AW DMCS
of 3 - p h e n o x y b e n z y l
d-phenothrin) to be
isomer
on c h r o m o s o r b
for fish,
4 and 16ppb
For a n a l y s i s liquid-solid
group)
separately
column)
for water
respectively.
of the water, using
one
liter
XAD-4
and of 350
The d e t e c t i o n
for d-cis and d-trans
extraction
by GC-MF
isomers, of w a t e r
resin
(Shimadzu,
with a common m/e of 183 (parent
limits were
ion of calculated
respectively. sample
(Organo)
was
subjected
and eluted
with
to
50ml
of
2003
acetone.
The e l u a t e
was c o n c e n t r a t e d
and d i s s o l v e d
in 2ml of hexane
for
G C- M F d e t e r m i n a t i o n . For a n a l y s i s of a s o l v e n t homogenate minutes
of fish,
mixture
After
liquid-liquid
partitioning
to remove
and r e c o n s t i t u t e d The r e c o v e r i e s
respectively. throughout
rpm,
(100,
50,
of the 50ml)
the c o m b i n e d
for
hexane
was s u b j e c t e d
and a c e t o n i t r i l e
weight
10 layer
to
and open
column
eluted with hexane/dichloromethane/acetic
Cosmosile
C18 , e l u t e d w i t h m e t h a n o l / w a t e r
fat in the extracts.
in the above fortified
to 0 . 0 5 p p m
Then,
procedures
were
at 4.3 or 0 . 4 3 p p b
of d - c i s
The optical
the sample
was c o n c e n t r a t e d
found
for water
and 0 . 2 0 p p m
and g e o m e t r i c a l
to be more
ratios
90% when
and 0 . 2 5 p p m
of d - t r a n s
isomer
than
isomer)
for fish,
remained
intact
the p r o c e d u r e s .
The a n a l y s i s extraction capillary
and an a l i q u o t
concentrate
hexane
w i t h an e q u i v a l e n t
w i t h 2ml of hexane.
were
(corresponding
at 2700
The
PR,
and Nakarai
(I/1)
times w i t h h e x a n e
between
(Florisile
(100/50/1)
d-phenothrin
three
centrifugation
and c o n c e n t r a t e d .
chromatographies
(90/10))
fish was h o m o g e n i z e d
of w a t e r / m e t h a n o l
was e x t r a c t e d
each.
was dehydrated
acid
whole
for p i p e r o n y l
manner
butoxide
as d e s c r i b e d
column)
was used
in fish was also
above,
but G C - F I D
conducted
(Shimadzu,
w i t h a same
GC-14A,
DB-5
for q u a n t i f i c a t i o n s .
RESULTS
Average compound
actual in w a t e r
3 . 4 p p b or 4.3ppb or 0.43ppb, Fish
concentrations were
0.72
no symtoms of each
a ft e r
exposure,
2 weeks
The o b s e r v e d
in Table
isomer
by 1.1
pairs)
reveals
as shown showed
isomers
of the test
concentrations
and 0 . 3 1 p p b
at 0.086
of 0.86
and
and 0 . 3 4 p p b
increased
in Fig.
the e x p e r i m e n t a l rapidly
period.
and r e a c h e d
The
a plateau
I.
no clear d e p e n d e n c y but r e m a r k a b l e
indicates
to 2.2-fold.
to carp,
higher
Statistical
the d i f f e r e n c e
butoxide
during
on the e x p o s u r e
differences
between
isomers,
I.
0.43 ppb of the test
increased,
in carp
of d-phenothrin,
fish m e a s u r e d
piperonyl
and 0.084
of i n t o x i c a t i o n
isomer
BCF values
concentrations
When
and 3 . 3 p p b at nominal
of d - p h e n o t h r i n
concentration
All the
and d - t r a n s
respectively.
showed
as shown
of d - c i s
BCF values analysis
to be s i g n i f i c a n t
compound
but no s i g n i f i c a n t
change
than d - t r a n s
(the t test for m a t c h e d at 0.1%
was e x p o s e d
the BCF v a l u e s
for the d - c i s
of the d - c i s
was o b s e r v e d
level.
in the p r e s e n c e isomer
of
clearly
for the d - t r a n s
isomer
2004
104
4.3ppb*
iO3
O,43ppb*
~ "~
~" tO
/
II
"~
d-cis
(hsh)
102
10'
10'
10°
r" o
O
d-trans (water)
~ 10 °
I
0
I
I
14 28
I
~
d-cis (water)
10-2
I
I
42 56
]4
Days
*: N o m i n a l Values
concentrations correspond
3.4 and 0 . 3 4 p p b
Table
I.
I
I
28
I
42 56
Days
B i o c o n c e n t r a t i o n of g e o m e t r i c
Fig.1.
d-trans (water)
10-'
d-cis (water)
I0-'
" ~ d-trans (fish) d-cis (fish)
i s o m e r s of d - p h e n o t h r i n
of d - p h e n o t h r i n
in water.
to 0.86 and 0 . 0 8 6 p p b for the d - c i s
for the d - t r a n s
BCF's of g e o m e t r i c
isomer,
respectively.
isomers of d - p h e n o t h r i n
4.3ppb*
BCF Days
14
28
42
56
cis
0.43ppb*
BCF ratio trans
and
BCF
(cis/trans)
BCF ratio
cis
trans
(cis/trans)
480
330
1.5
490
320
1.5
480
360
1.3
670
500
1.3
450
370
1.2
660
290
2.2
470
320
1.5
730
490
1.5
610
400
1.5
380
280
1.4
530
400
1.3
600
530
1.1
330
270
1.2
500
340
1.5
420
320
1.3
330
210
1.6
*: N o m i n a l
concentrations
Values correspond
of d - p h e n o t h r i n
to 0.86 and 0 . 0 8 6 p p b
0 . 3 4 p p b for the d - t r a n s
isomer,
in water. for the d - c i s
respectively.
and 3.4 and
2005
(BCF c i s / t r a n s piperonyl
ratio:
butoxide
11-20),
was d e t e c t e d
In this e x p e r i m e n t ,
average
isomers
compound
of the test
concentrations observed plateau
of 0.086
actual
2. In e x p o s e d
concentrations
in w a t e r
exposure.
confirmed
in Table
at the c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
and 0.34ppb),
for fish d u r i n g was also
as shown
after
were
of the d-cis
0.080
As shown
and 0 . 3 0 p p b
in Fig.
and d-trans
(at n o m i n a l
of i n t o x i c a t i o n
was
2, a b i o c o n c e n t r a t i o n
exposure.
Table
0.43ppb+PBO"
of 81 to 110ppm.
and no s y m p t o m
2 w e ek s
fish,
2.
Effect
of p i p e r o n y l
butoxide
10"
on the b i o c o n c e n t r a t i o n
~
102
geometric
d-cis (fish) d-trans (fish)
~. o.
isomers
of
of
d-phenothrin
0.43ppb+PBO*
c 10' 0 P
BCF
t(D
o 10° t-
Days
cis
ratio trans
(cis/trans)
O
O
d-trans (water)
~ 10-'
14
d-cis (water)
28 10-2
3800
190
20
3600
320
11
2600
210
12
2400
200
12
Days
*: d - P h e n o t h r i n Fig.2.
Bioconcentration geometric
isomers
d-phenothrin presence
of
to
of
in the
of p i p e r o n y l
d-Phenothrin at 0 . 4 3 p p b
was e x p o s e d
to carp
in
the p r e s e n c e
of 1 . 0 p p m
of p i p e r o n y l
butoxide
(PBO).
in
the
of p i p e r o n y l
butoxide W.
carp
was e x p o s e d presence butoxide
of
at 0 . 4 3 p p b 1.0ppm
(PBO).
2006
DISCUSSIONS
In this isomers
study,
a certain
is o b s e r v e d
statistically difference
difference
(Table
significant
can be done
I). The d i f f e r e n c e at 0.1% level.
by c o n s i d e r i n g
bioconcentrations
of the isomers.
biotransformation
will be d e s c r i b e d
compartment
bioconcentration
BCF : Cf(~)/Cw(~)
where
Cf(~)
water,
and Cw(~)
respectively
rate constants, The e q u a t i o n
in carp was
Elimination
rapidly
isomer
products
isomer
(e.g.
c-phenothrin When
exposure
considerable (Table
reactions
microsomal oxidation
elevation
isomers
in
isomer
as r e p o r t e d
The higher
should
were d e g r a d e d
one week.
lower BCF value
study:
isomer
have
Based on was
similarly
for
of the d - t r a n s
metabolic,
resulted
therefore,
in the
lower
p r o d u c ts
moiety
or h y d r o l y z e d
isomer
conjugate
in carp 3) were ester
of the alcohol
amounting
oxidized
(e.g.
and at the methyl
metabolites
sulfate
conjugate
were of 3-(4'-
to 47% of the i d e n t i f i e d were mostly
of 4'-OH-,
formed
desphenyl-,
from the d - c i s and
4'-OH-~t-alc-
to 77%).
is c o n d u c t e d
in the p r e se n c e
of the BCF value
piperony
butoxide
of piperonyl
is o b s e r v e d
is well
o x y g e n a s e 4) and the d - c i s as m e n t i o n e d
attributable
results
or d - t r a n s - i s o m e r
d-cis
the d - t r a n s
isomer,
Ester-cleaved
acid
glucuronide amounting
Both
of d - p h e n o t h r i n
of the d - t r a n s
whereas
2). Since
by b i o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n .
fish w i t h i n
of 14C,
explains
at 4 ' - p o s i t i o n
hydroxyphenoxy)-benzoic metabolites),
in fish and
isomer.
of the acid moiety.
principal
well
in the p r e s e n t
than the d - c i s
oxidations
from
than the d - c i s
rate of the d - t r a n s
The m a j o r m e t a b o l i c
group
of the two-
and e l i m i n a t i o n
in b i o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
e t . a l . 3)
excreted
metabolized
cleavage,
rate
of 1 4 C - l a b e l e d
by T a k i m o t o
completely
mammals. 7) This o b s e r v a t i o n
BCF value
by
)
of the c o m p o u n d
K 1 and K 2 uptake
rate c o n s t a n t
the higher
for the d i s t r i b u t i o n
the d - c i s
on
BCF e q u a t i o n
( I
state,
the o b s e r v a t i o n s
than
for the
in fish.
investigated
more
of the c o m p o u n d
= KI/(K2+K3)
that
but
explanation
of m e t a b o l i s m
by a f o l l o w i n g
biotransformation
and almost
disappearance
the effect
and K 3 an e l i m i n a t i o n
The c o m p a r a t i v e
is not so large,
A possible
are the c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
suggests
and d - t r a n s
d-cis
model I)-
at a steady
the lower BCF value
rapidly
in BCF's b e t w e e n
isomer
oxidative
reaction
a
for the d - c i s
known as an inhibitor is m e t a b o l i z e d
above 3) , the e l e v a t i o n
to a reduced
butoxide,
observed
here
isomer of
mainly should
of the i n h i b i t e d
by be
enzyme.
The
2007
contribution calculated eq.(1)
and by s e t t i n g
Thus, d-cis
to the e l i m i n a t i o n
to be 2.3 to 11 by i n t r o d u c i n g
conducted
with
of b i o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
the rate c o n s t a n t
in the p r e s e n c e
a metabolic
isomer
The d-trans
relations
effect
the o b s e r v e d
K3/K 2) was
BCF values
K 3 to be 0 when e x p o s u r e
into the was
butoxide.
on b i o c o n c e n t r a t i o n
whose metabolism
the d-trans
it f o l l o w e d
of p i p e r o n y l
(i.e.
proceeds
was c l e a r l y
mainly
through
indicated
oxidation
for the
as c o m p a r e d
isomer.
isomer,
on the other
a rapid e s t e r
cleavage
to the o x i d i z i n g
hand,
did
not show such e l e v a t i o n
or hydrolysis,
because
w h i c h has no d i r e c t
enzyme.
CONCLUSION
This
study
clearly
demonstrated
carp was
significantly
presence
of p i p e r o n y l
d-cis
isomer,
higher
that
the BCF value
than the d-trans
butoxide
resulted
but no r e m a r k a b l e
change
of d-cis
isomer
phenothrin
and an e x p o s u r e
in an e l e v a t e d
BCF value
in BCF's was o b s e r v e d
in
in the
for the
for the d-trans
isomer. Considering result
an i n h i b i t e d
obtained
oxidative
here was well
bioconcentration
phenomenon
metabolism
explained
for the d-cis
and a s i g n i f i c a n c e
isomer,
the
of m e t a b o l i s m
in
was e x e m p l i f i e d .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The a u t h o r s and Dr.
are i n d e b t e d
H. Yamada,
to P r o f e s s o r
Sumitomo
Chemical
Dr. T. Nishihara,
Co.,
Ltd.,
Osaka
University
for their helpful
discussions.
REFERENCE
I) Lech,
J.J.
2) Melancon,
and J.R. M.J.,Jr.
Bend,
Environ.
and J.J.
Lech,
Health
Perspect.,
Xenobiotica,
34,
7(10),
115-131
633-640
3) Takimoto, Y.,et.al., A b s t r a c t paper of the S i x t h I n t e r n a t i o n a l of P e s t i c i d e C h e m i s t r y (IUPAC) Otawa, 7B-04 (1986). 4) Casida, 5) OECD
J.E.,et.al.,
(1981),
6) Bligh, E.G. (1959). 7) Izumi
Science,N.
Guidelines and W.J.
,et.al.,
Y.,
for T e s t i n g
Dyer,
J. Pestic.
Can. Sci.,
153,
1130-1133
9, 259-267
(Receivedin Germany 18 May 1992; accepted25 May 1992)
and Physiol., (1984).
Congress
(1966).
of C h e m i c a l s . , v o l . 3 0 5 C ,
J. Biochem.
(1980).
(1977).
Paris. 37,
911-917