Effect of seafood peptones on biomass and metabolic activity by Enterococcus faecalis DM19

Effect of seafood peptones on biomass and metabolic activity by Enterococcus faecalis DM19

Accepted Manuscript Effect of seafood peptones on biomass and metabolic activity by Enterococcus faecalis DM19 Mustapha Djellouli, Oscar Martínez-Álva...

486KB Sizes 1 Downloads 37 Views

Accepted Manuscript Effect of seafood peptones on biomass and metabolic activity by Enterococcus faecalis DM19 Mustapha Djellouli, Oscar Martínez-Álvarez, Mirari Y. Arancibia, Diego FlorezCuadrado, María Ugarte-Ruíz, Lucas Domínguez, Halima Zadi-Karam, Noureddine Karam, Salima Roudj, M. Elvira López-Caballero PII:

S0023-6438(17)30173-1

DOI:

10.1016/j.lwt.2017.03.028

Reference:

YFSTL 6101

To appear in:

LWT - Food Science and Technology

Received Date: 12 December 2016 Revised Date:

23 February 2017

Accepted Date: 14 March 2017

Please cite this article as: Djellouli, M., Martínez-Álvarez, O., Arancibia, M.Y., Florez-Cuadrado, D., Ugarte-Ruíz, M., Domínguez, L., Zadi-Karam, H., Karam, N., Roudj, S., López-Caballero, M.E., Effect of seafood peptones on biomass and metabolic activity by Enterococcus faecalis DM19, LWT - Food Science and Technology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.03.028. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Effect of seafood peptones on biomass and metabolic activity by

2

Enterococcus faecalis DM19

3

Mustapha Djelloulia,b, Oscar Martínez-Álvarezc, Mirari Y. Arancibiac,d, Diego

4

Florez-Cuadradoe, María Ugarte-Ruíze, Lucas Domíngueze, Halima Zadi-

5

Karama, Noureddine Karama, Salima Roudja and M. Elvira López-Caballeroc*

6

a

RI PT

1

Laboratory for Biology of Microorganisms and Biotechnology, Department of

Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences of Nature and Life, University of Oran 1

8

Ahmed Benbella, BP 1524 El-M'Naouer, 31000 Oran, Algeria.

Biotechnology Research Center, Department of Food Biotechnology, Ali

M AN U

b

SC

7

Mendjeli, Nouvelle Ville, UV 03 BP E73, 25000 Constantine, Algeria

11 12 13 14

Institute of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition (ICTAN-CSIC)**, C/José

Antonio Novais, 28040 Madrid, Spain d

Technical University of Ambato (UTA), Av. Los Chasquis y Río Payamino,

Ambato, Ecuador e

TE D

10

c

VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid,

EP

9

Avda. Puerta de Hierro, s/n. 28040 Madrid, Spain. to

whom

AC C

*Author

correspondence

should

be

addressed

[e-mail

[email protected]] 15

**This centre has implemented and maintains a Quality Management System

16

which fulfils the requirements of the ISO standard 9001:2008

17

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abbreviations:

19

SQES : Squid protein hydrolyzed with Esperase

20

SQAP : Squid protein hydrolyzed with Alkaline protease

21

SQTR : Squid protein hydrolyzed with Trypsin

22

SHAP : Shrimp protein hydrolyzed with Alkaline protease

23

SHNP : Shrimp protein hydrolyzed with Neutral protease

24

SHEE : Shrimp protein hydrolyzed with endogenous enzymes

25

FGTR : Fish gelatin hydrolyzed with Trypsin

26

SHPR : Shrimp protein hydrolyzed with Protamex

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

18

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

28

Eight seafood protein hydrolysates (SPHs) obtained from squid, shrimp and fish

29

gelatin were incorporated as substitutes of peptones in culture media in order to

30

evaluate its effect on survival and metabolic activity (lactic acid, acetic acid and

31

bacteriocins production) of Enterococcus faecalis DM19. The substitution of

32

commercial peptones in culture media by either a shrimp hydrolysate prepared

33

with Protamex, or by squid protein hydrolysates prepared with Esperase or

34

Alkaline protease, stimulated E. faecalis DM19 growth up to 16%. The

35

incorporation of SPHs, mainly from shrimp, in the culture media significantly

36

increased production of lactic and acetic acids in more than 60%. Furthermore,

37

the media containing SPHs stimulated antimicrobial activity by E. faecalis

38

DM19. The inhibitory activity was observed against both Gram-positive and

39

Gram-negative microorganisms, but it was remarkably observed against Listeria

40

monocytogenes. SPHs incorporated in culture media render properties of bio-

41

technological interest, which, together with their low price, make them suitable

42

for industrial use.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

43

RI PT

27

Keywords: Enterococcus faecalis DM19, seafood protein hydrolysates,

45

bacteriocinogenic activity, antimicrobial activity, renewable materials

46

AC C

44

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

48

The genus Enterococcus comprises species considered components of the

49

human and animal intestinal flora (Khan, Flint, & Yu, 2010) and is generally

50

found in large numbers in dairy products and fermented foods. Lactic and acetic

51

acid, diacetyl, and bacteriocins are some of the molecules produced by these

52

microorganisms that present antimicrobial activity (Gilmore, Lebreton, & van

53

Schaik, 2013). Moreover, several E. faecalis strains have been investigated as

54

potential probiotics (Franz, Huch, Abriouel, Holzapfel, Gálvez, 2011). Therefore,

55

from the viewpoint of their industrial importance, E. faecalis could play a

56

significant role in fermentation and preservation of some foods (Khan, Flint, &

57

Yu, 2010).

58

Like other lactic acid bacteria (LAB) groups, enterococci can only grow in a rich

59

microbial growth medium which contains all the necessary compounds such as

60

amino acids, peptides, fatty acids, vitamins and nucleic acids required for

61

optimal growth and metabolite production. These compounds are usually

62

provided in the form of complex nitrogen sources such as yeast extract, meat

63

extract, tryptone, peptone or bactopeptone. Those nitrogen sources can reach

64

high prices and be unsuitable for industrial scale production of microorganisms

65

(Zhang & Gresham, 1999). Thus, there is great interest in investigating cheap

66

renewable nitrogenous materials to prepare a low-cost fermentation medium.

67

Several authors (Aspmo, Horn, & Eijsink, 2005; Hujanen & Linko, 1996; Li, Han,

68

Ji, Wang, & Tan, 2010; Yu, Lei, Ren, Pei, & Feng, 2008) studied various

69

nitrogen sources (yeast extract, malt sprout, peptones, grass extract, corn steep

70

liquor, casein hydrolysates, distiller’s waste, ammonium phosphates, wheat

71

bran, fish waste hydrolysates and urea) for lactic acid fermentation. The use of

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

47

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT autolysates as a peptone source in bacteriocin production by LAB was also

73

studied (Deraz, El-Fawal, Abd-Ellatif, & Khalil, 2011). Nevertheless, to our best

74

knowledge, there is no information about the stimulation of lactic acid and/or

75

production of bacteriocin by E. faecalis in MRS media formulated with seafood

76

(crustacean and cephalopods) protein hydrolysates.

77

The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of different seafood

78

protein hydrolysates as a peptone source on biomass production of E. faecalis

79

DM19. The production of organic acids (lactic, acetic and formic acids) and

80

bacteriocins in these culture media were also studied.

81

2. Material and methods

82

2.1.

83

The E. faecalis DM19 was obtained from the Laboratory for Biology of

84

Microorganisms and Biotechnology (University of Oran 1 Ahmed Benbella,

85

Algeria). The strain was originally isolated from raw camel milk collected in the

86

Mauritania area and identified by PCR amplification using E. faecalis primers

87

and 16S rDNA sequencing (Vincent, Roy, Mondou, & Dery, 1998). A search for

88

homology of the DNA sequence was performed using the BLAST algorithm

89

available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, USA).

90

2.2.

91

Squid (Loligo vulgaris) muscle trimmings, by-products (muscle trimmings,

92

carapace and heads) derived from processing Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus

93

vannamei) and Southern pink shrimp (Penaeus notialis), and high molecular

94

weight (HMW) dried fish skin gelatine (type A) of cold water fish (Sebastes spp.)

95

were used as raw material to prepare seafood protein hydrolysates. The by-

AC C

EP

TE D

Bacterial strain

M AN U

SC

RI PT

72

Preparation of seafood protein hydrolysates

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT products were minced and hydrolysed with commercial or endogenous

97

enzymes (Table 1) which were kindly provided by Novozymes (Denmark).

98

Enzymatic reactions were controlled by using a pH-stat. After hydrolysis, the

99

samples were rapidly heated to 90°C for 15 min to inactivate the enzymes. The

100

hydrolysates were then centrifuged at 10000 x g for 20 minutes at 4ºC

101

(Beckman J2-MC, Palo Alto, California, USA). The degree of hydrolysis for each

102

hydrolysate was calculated according to Spellman, McEvoy, O'Cuinn, and

103

FitzGerald (2003). The supernatants were freeze-dried under vacuum and kept

104

at -20°C until their use in the culture media formulation.

105

2.3.

106

Peptone in MRS (Man, Rogosa and Sharpe, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt,

107

Germany) media was substituted by protein hydrolysates (marine peptones) at

108

two different concentrations as depicted in Table 2 (MRS –standard culture

109

media- was considered as control and MRS- -without peptone- as negative

110

control). After adjusting the pH to 7, the media were autoclaved at 121°C for 20

111

min. Inoculum (1%, v/v) consisting of cellular suspension of an 18 h young

112

culture of E. faecalis DM19 in MRS broth medium, was adjusted to an OD (600

113

nm) of 0.900 (UV-Visible spectrophotometer model UV-1601 from Shimadzu).

114

Then, the broth was centrifuged at 12000 x g (Microspin 24S from Sorvall

115

instruments) for 10 min at 4°C and the sediment was washed twice with

116

phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 7.0) to remove all traces of the culture medium. The

117

washed cells were re-suspended in sterile distilled water and then adjusted to

118

the initial OD (600nm).They were then used to inoculate modified MRS medium.

119

After 24 hours of incubation at 30°C, an aliquot of the medium was taken to

120

determine bacterial growth. The rest of the medium was centrifuged at 5000 x g

AC C

EP

TE D

Culture media

M AN U

SC

RI PT

96

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 121

for 20 min at 4°C (Sorvall, model RT 6000B). The supernatant was used for the

122

assessment of glucose, total nitrogen, organic acids (lactic acid, acetic acid,

123

formic acid) and to determine the bacteriocinogenic activity.

124

2.4.

125

Cell growth was directly monitored by measuring the optical density of the

126

culture broth samples at 600 nm using spectrophotometer (UV-Visible

127

spectrophotometer model UV-1601 from Shimadzu). The evolution of pH in the

128

culture broth was determined with a pH meter (inoLab, D-82362 Weilheim

129

Germany).

130

The total nitrogen content was determined using the Dumas combustion

131

method following AOAC 992.15 (1995) in a LECO model FP-2000 (Leco

132

Instruments, Madrid, Spain) protein/nitrogen calibrated with EDTA. Protein

133

content was estimated by multiplying the total nitrogen content by the factor

134

6.25, and was expressed as grams of protein/100 grams of sample.

135

Glucose and organic acid content (lactic, acetic, formic, pyruvic and citric acids)

136

were determined by HPAEC-PAD (High Performance Anion Exchange

137

Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection) using a Metrohm

138

Advanced Compact ion chromatography instrument (867 IC. Metrohm)

139

equipped with an IC-819 conductivity detector, an IC Pump 818 and an IC-837

140

degasser coupled. Firstly, the supernatants (obtained as previously described)

141

were diluted in ultrapure water and then filtered through a membrane of 0.45 µm

142

pore size. For glucose determination, 20 µL of samples were injected into a

143

Hamilton RC X 30 (250 x 4 mm, 5 µm pore size) column. The samples were

144

eluted from the column over 35 min at a flow of 1 mL/min with an isocratic

145

gradient of 30 mM NaOH with 3 mM AcNa. For organic acids, the identification

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Analytical methods

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and quantification were carried out by injecting 20 µL of the samples into

147

Metrosep Organic Acid (250 x 4 mm, 5 µm pore size) column and the elution

148

was performed with 1 mM perchloric acid and acetone (10 %) as mobile phase

149

over 20 min at a flow of 0.5 mL/min. All the molecules studied were identified by

150

their retention times and quantified based on calibration curves derived from

151

standards. The results were expressed as mg/L of the culture supernatant. It is

152

evident that concerning the accumulation of acetic acid into the culture medium,

153

the initially added sodium acetate concentration (=5.0 g/L) was taken into

154

consideration for the calculations performed. All assays were carried out in

155

triplicate.

156

2.5.

SC

M AN U

157

RI PT

146

Bacteriocinogenic activity and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of E. faecalis DM19

Culture supernatants from the different media tested were filtered through a

159

cellulose acetate sterile filter (0.22 µm) to remove bacterial cells. The extracts

160

obtained were then lyophilized and stored at – 20°C. The samples were re-

161

suspended in distilled water to a concentration of 5 mg/mL for the culture

162

extracts. Finally, the pH of the prepared solutions was adjusted to 7.0 with

163

NaOH (3N).

164

The antimicrobial activity of the supernatant was tested with the disc diffusion

165

method (Arancibia, Giménez, López-Caballero, Gómez-Guillén, & Montero,

166

2014). Briefly, sterile paper discs (5 mm diameter, Whatman No. 1) impregnated

167

with 40 µL of the supernatant solutions were placed on the surface of agar

168

plates inoculated with several microorganisms from the Spanish Type Culture

169

Collection (CECT) selected due to their relevance in human health (either lactic

170

acid bacteria or pathogens) or to their role in food spoilage: Aeromonas

AC C

EP

TE D

158

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT hydrophila CECT 839T, Aspergillus niger CECT 2088, Bacillus cereus CECT

172

148, Bacillus coagulans CECT 56, Bifidobacterium bifidum DSMZ 20215,

173

Brochothrix thermosphacta CECT 847, Citrobacter freundii CECT 401,

174

Clostridium perfringens CECT 486, Debaryomyces hansenii CECT 11364,

175

Enterococcus faecium DSM 20477, Escherichia coli CECT 515, Lactobacillus

176

helveticus DSM 20075, Listeria monocytogenes CECT 4032, Penicillium

177

expansum DSMZ 62841, Pseudomonas fluorescens CECT 4898, Salmonella

178

choleraesuis CECT 4300, Shewanella putrefaciens CECT 5346T, Shigella

179

sonnei

180

parahaemolyticus CECT 511T, Yersinia enterocolitica CECT 4315. After

181

incubation, the diameter of the inhibition zone (considered antimicrobial activity)

182

was measured with Corel Draw X6 software. Results were expressed as mm of

183

inhibited growth area (magnification ratio 1:10). Each determination was

184

performed in triplicate.

185

In order to evaluate which type of bacteriocin was present, the genome of E.

186

faecalis DM19 was sequenced by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) method

187

(Goodwin, McPherson, & McCombie, 2016). The DNA libraries were sequenced

188

in the Illumina HiSeq platform, using 100bp paired-end sequencing reads. The

189

raw sequence data of the sample was de novo assembled using algorithm

190

SPAdes 3.9 (Bankevich et al., 2012). Bacteriocin genes were identified using

191

the bacteriocin mining tool Bagel3 (Van Heel, de Jong, Montalbán-López, Kok,

192

& Kuipers 2013). Each bacteriocin-like gene identified was checked using

193

BLASTX algorithm.

194

2.6.

Staphylococcus

aureus

CECT

240,

Vibrio

M AN U

4887,

AC C

EP

TE D

CECT

SC

RI PT

171

Statistical analysis

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Statistical tests were performed using the SPSS computer program (SPSS

196

Statistical Software, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-way analysis of variance

197

(ANOVA) was carried out. The difference of means between pairs was resolved

198

by means of confidence intervals using a Tukey-b test at a significance level of

199

5%.

200

3. Results and discussion

201

3.1.

202

The substitution of commercial peptone in culture media by hydrolysates from

203

squid (SQTR and SQAP) and prawn (SHPR), especially at two-fold

204

concentration, significantly increased the biomass (maxOD600) of E. faecalis

205

DM19 (Table 3). In contrast, the growth in media where SHAP or FGTR (one or

206

two-fold) were incorporated was significantly lower when compared with that of

207

commercial MRS. In addition, the terminal pH in E. faecalis DM19 cultures was

208

quite low as expected (Table 3). The data show an inverse correlation between

209

biomass production and terminal pH.

210

Some studies have been carried out to assess the ability of commercial

211

proteolytic

212

microorganisms) to reduce fish protein (whole fish or wastes) into peptides and

213

amino acids, which can be an economical source of peptones for bacterial

214

growth media. In fact, protein hydrolysates from seafood by-products can be

215

possible substitutes for the usual protein hydrolysate-based substrates in

216

microbial cultures (Gao, Hirata, Toorisaka, & Hano, 2006). In this work, seafood

217

peptones showed an activity which was in the same range as the commercial

218

peptone activity or scarcely higher in some cases, suggesting a well-balanced

RI PT

195

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Effect of SPHs on growth

from

different

resources

(plants,

animals

or

AC C

enzymes

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT nutrient concentration of these SPHs media. Stein, Svein, and Vincent (2005a)

220

reported that since peptones may differ in buffer capacity and the terminal pH

221

values reached in the Escherichia coli cultures were low, the observed growth

222

differences were due to the pH/buffering effect. In the present work, E. faecalis

223

showed a different biomass after fermentation in media including SPHs at a

224

similar pH (Table 3). Vázquez, González, and Murado (2004) found similar

225

results when testing the growth of Roseobacter sp on MRS supplemented with

226

squid hydrolysate at different concentrations. These authors attributed this

227

phenomenon to the presence of compounds (perhaps lipidic peroxides) with a

228

slight inhibitory effect on the corresponding microorganism. Moreover, the

229

peptidic composition of the SPH added to the MRS media may also affect

230

bacterial growth (Table 3) since the results obtained from MRS media including

231

hydrolysates derived from the same substrate (squid or shrimp) were different

232

(P≤ 0.05). In this connection, Stein, Svein, and Vincent (2005b) cultivated LAB

233

on MRS media supplemented with hydrolysates from cod viscera prepared with

234

Alcalase, Papain and endogenous enzymes and found that peptone

235

performance is highly dependent on composition details as peptide length,

236

peptide sequences, and the amount of free amino acids. In the present work, E.

237

faecalis DM19 exhibited a clear preference for MRS media including one-fold

238

concentration of squid protein hydrolysates prepared with Esperase or Alkaline

239

protease (SQES and SQAP, respectively), or shrimp protein hydrolysate

240

prepared with Protamex (SHPR). However, the incorporation of a shrimp protein

241

hydrolysate prepared with an alkaline protease (SHAP) in the media affected

242

negatively bacterial growth. The amount of SPHs incorporated in MRS media

243

also seems to be important in the biomass production (Table 3). The results

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

219

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT may be explained by the fact that certain proteases can release amino acids

245

and peptides suitable for the transport of bacteria and proteolytic systems

246

(Kunji, Mierau, Hagting, Poolman, & Konings, 1996). Moreover, certain

247

hydrolysates as SHAP or FGTR may contain antimicrobial peptides or

248

compounds that negatively affect bacterial growth (Van’t Hof, Veerman,

249

Helmerhorst & Amerongen, 2001).

250

The production of organic acids by E. faecalis DM19 could also be affected by

251

the composition of the MRS media. If the culture medium stimulates the

252

production of organic acids by the bacteria, these acids could decrease the pH

253

of the media and regulate bacterial growth significantly. This fact could explain

254

why the media prepared with two-fold concentration of SHEE promoted a low

255

production of biomass and a high production of acetic acid. Different

256

investigations have been driven in this way to confirm the inhibitory effect of

257

acetic acid on several microorganisms. Recently, Boguta and Jensen (2014)

258

reported that, for Pediococcus acidilactici, 5.3 g/L acetate caused a 4% growth

259

inhibition and showed a synergistic effect when the strain was grown with both

260

acetate and furfural. Therefore, the inhibition phenomenon shown for SHEE

261

was probably due to the high concentration of acetate produced by E. faecalis

262

(Table 3).

263

3.2.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

264

RI PT

244

Effect of SPHs on production of organic acids and consumption of glucose and protein

265

The amount of glucose and protein in the different media were measured before

266

and after the fermentation process (Table 4). Glucose and protein consumptions

267

for bacteria were higher in media with one-fold concentration of SPHs. The

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT highest glucose consumption was found in media containing SQES. Glucose

269

consumption augmented when a higher amount of SPHs was added in the

270

media, while protein consumption decreased significantly. Protein consumption

271

was minimal in media including SPHs prepared with alkaline protease (SQAP

272

and SHAP).

273

Acid production depended on the media and on peptone concentration (Table

274

4). Lactic and acetic acids were the major products of the fermentation process

275

with E. faecalis DM19, while formic acid was produced in low quantities. The

276

incorporation of SPH in the media improved notably the production of lactic acid

277

in all samples, and that of acetic acid especially in SHPR-S and SHEE-S

278

samples. Interestingly, the highest production of lactic acid was achieved in

279

media with the mentioned hydrolysates.

280

As describe before, SHPR is the best supplement for efficient lactic acid

281

production in medium of 1f. Furthermore, the increment for SPH in the media

282

(2f) exerted a positive effect on lactic acid production (Table 4). The quantities

283

produced in SHAP-S and SHPR-S samples were 1.6 times larger compared to

284

those in MRS medium. These differences in production could be due to the

285

marine peptones used in fermentation, since the strain was cultivated under the

286

same experimental conditions. In this regard, lactate production increased in

287

Streptococcus zooepidemicus when tryptone was replaced by marine peptones

288

(Vázquez, Montemayor, Fraguas, & Murado, 2009) while the increase in wheat

289

bran concentration promotes lactic acid production by Lactobacillus rhamnosus

290

LA-04-1 (Zheng, Lu, Yizhi, Xiaonan, & Tianwei, 2010). E. faecalis, like other

291

LAB, requires amino acids such as histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine,

292

glutamate, glycine, tryptophan, valine (Murray et al., 1993) to achieve optimal

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

268

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT cultivation conditions. The results obtained with E. faecalis in the present work

294

confirm that the different amino acid and peptide composition of marine

295

peptones could procure different efficiency in the amino acid and peptide uptake

296

systems (Kunji, Mierau, Hagting, Poolman, & Konings, 1996). The increase of

297

nitrogen provided by SPHs, significantly arises glucose uptake, and

298

consequently lactic acid production (Table 4), and hence its assimilation, as has

299

already been reported by Fakas, Papanikolaou,Komaitis, and Aggelis (2008) for

300

Cunninghamella echinulate.

301

3.3.

302

In order to investigate antagonistic profiles of the E.faecalis DM19 strain, cell-

303

free supernatant extracts were tested against 21 microbial strains (Table 5).

304

Differences in the diameter of inhibition halos were particularly notable up to

305

18.73±1.80 mm. Cell-free supernatants from E. faecalis DM19 grown in MRS

306

exhibited bactericidal activity against the majority of studied strains excluding

307

Aspergillus niger CECT 2088, Bacillus coagulans CECT 56, Penicillium

308

expansum DSMZ 62841 and Yersinia enterocolitica CECT 4315. However,

309

these microorganisms were sensitive to the cell-free supernatants from MRS

310

prepared by the hydrolysates (Table 5). Previous works had already reported

311

that E. faecalis produce a broad-spectrum of bacteriocins (enterocins), which

312

are active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Line, Svetoch,

313

Eruslanov, Perelygin et al., 2008; Pieniz, Andreazza, Anghinoni, Camargo, &

314

Brandelli, 2014). This fact could be reasonable since the pH of the culture

315

supernatants used in this study were neutralized to avoid the antimicrobial

316

effect of organic acids (lactate, acetate, etc.) and since anaerobic conditions

317

were imposed to decrease H2O2.

SC

RI PT

293

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

Effect of SPHs on bacteriocin like inhibitory substances production

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The substitution of commercial peptone in the media by one-fold concentration

319

of SPH did not lead to a relevant production of antimicrobial compounds in

320

terms of effectiveness and number of microorganisms inhibited. However, when

321

commercial peptone was substituted by two-fold concentration of SPHs, the

322

supernatants exhibited an interesting inhibitory activity against a large number

323

of indicator strains investigated (Table 5). The highest inhibitory activity was

324

observed mainly against Listeria monocytogenes CECT 4032, which was

325

significantly inhibited by SQES supernatant as compared with MRS (p≤0.05).

326

It has been shown that the composition of the growth medium, particularly the

327

source and concentration of nitrogen, strongly affects the production of

328

bacteriocin (Gänzle, Weber, & Hammes, 1999). As can be seen in Table 5, the

329

production of bacteriocin-like substances by E. faecalis production was

330

enhanced when SPHs concentration increased from 10 to 20 g/L. Accordingly,

331

the increasing concentrations of yeast extract, meat extract or peptone can

332

allow an increase in the production of bacteriocins. It can be possible that fish

333

peptones could have suitable contents, in terms of free amino acids and short

334

peptides, that are precursors for bacteriocin production (Kanmani et al., 2010),

335

whereas some authors have pointed out that bacteriocin production by lactic

336

acid bacteria is a growth-associated process (De Vuyst, Callewaert, & Crabbé,

337

1996).

338

3.4.

339

Once the genome of E. faecalis DM19 was assembled, the presence of

340

bacteriocin genes was tested using the BAGEL3 algorithm. Four sequences

341

related with bacteriocin-like genes were identified but only two showed proper

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

318

Bacteriocin genes identified in the E. faecalis DM19 genome

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT length and amino acid identity higher than 99%: the enterolysin A and a

343

lantibiotic gene (Table 6). The annotation of the bacteriocins identified was

344

based on amino acid sequences homology (Supplementary data).

345

Enterolysin A is a heat-labile bacteriocin, firstly reported in E. faecalis LMG2333

346

and widely distributed among enterococci strains (Nilsen et al. 2003; Hickey et

347

al. 2003; Nigutova et al. 2007; Almeida et al. 2011). It belongs to the class III of

348

the bacteriocins and has a bacteriolytic mode of action over cell wall (Nilsen et

349

al, 2003). Our results are in line with the data already published about

350

enterolysin A in which it was described that inhibits growth of enterococci,

351

pediococci, lactococci and lactobacilli (Nilsen et al, 2003; Khan et al, 2013).

352

Furthermore, enterolysin A shows a wide spectrum of activity possibly due to

353

the cleavage of the peptide bond in the stem peptide and the interpeptide bridge

354

of the peptidoglycan units (Khan et al, 2013).

355

Besides, the other bacteriocin identified in E. faecalis DM19 is the one known

356

as lantibiotic because of the content of lanthionine and/or methyllanthionine in

357

its primary structure. These substances belong to class I bacteriocins and its

358

activity falls mainly on Gram-positive bacteria (Bierbaum et al, 2009).

359

Lantibiotics are heat-stable peptides and, like enterolysin A, also act on the cell

360

wall of other bacteria (Sahl et al, 1998).

361

Conclusion

362

Protein hydrolysates prepared mainly from squid and shrimp have sufficient

363

nutritional value to support growth and metabolite production of E. faecalis

364

DM19. The increase of nitrogen provided by these hydrolysates in culture media

365

increases glucose uptake, and consequently lactic acid production by this

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

342

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT strain. Moreover, the increase of fish peptones enhanced the bacteriocin

367

producing of E. faecalis DM19, which was especially active against Listeria

368

monocytogenes. These strain properties, together with the low price of protein

369

hydrolysates, make them suitable for use in the fermented food industry.

370

Acknowledgements

371

This research was financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and

372

Competitiveness (projects AGL2011-27607, AGL2014-52825-R). Author M.

373

Djellouli is funded by The National Centre of Biotechnology Research (CNRBt)

374

of Algeria and ENP (Exceptional National Program) Scholarship provided by the

375

Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Algeria. Author M.

376

Arancibia is funded by a SENESCYT Scholarship provided by the Ecuadorian

377

government.

378

References

379

Almeida, T., Brandão, A., Muñoz-Atienza, E., Gonçalves, A., Torres, C., Igrejas,

380

G., Hernández, P.E., Herranz, C., Cintas, L.M., Poeta, P. (2011). Identification

381

of bacteriocin genes in enterococci isolated from game animals and saltwater

382

fish. Journal of Food Protection, 74, 1252-1260

383

Arancibia, M., Giménez, B., López-Caballero, M.E, Gómez-Guillén, M.C.,

384

Montero, P. (2014). Release of cinnamon essential oil from polysaccharide

385

bilayer films and its use for microbial growth inhibition in chilled shrimps. LWT-

386

Food Science and Technology, 59, 989-995.

387

AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical

388

Chemists. The Association Official Analytical Chemists 992.15. AOAC,

389

Washington, DC

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

366

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Aspmo, S.I., Horn, S.J., Eijsink, V.G. (2005). Use of hydrolysates from Atlantic

391

cod (Gadus morhua L.) viscera as a complex nitrogen source for lactic acid

392

bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 248 (1), 65-68

393

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A.A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A.S.,

394

Lesin, V.M., Nikolenko, S.I., Pham, S., Prjibelski, A.D., Pyshkin, A.V., Sirotkin,

395

A.V., Vyahhi, N., Tesler, G., Alekseyev, M.A., Pevzner, P.A. (2012). SPAdes: a

396

new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

397

Journal of Computational Biology, 19, 455-477

398

Bierbaum, G., Sahl, H.G. (2009). Lantibiotics : Mode of action, biosynthesis and

399

bioengineering. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 10(1) : 2-18

400

Boguta, A.M., Jensen, P.R. (2014). Screening of lactic acid bacteria for their

401

potential as microbial cell factories for bioconversion of lignocellulosic

402

feedstocks. Micobial Cell Factories, 13, 97

403

De Vuyst, L., Callewaert, R., Crabbé, K. (1996). Primary metabolite kinetics of

404

bacteriocin biosynthesis by Lactobacillus amylovorus and evidence for

405

stimulation of bacteriocin production under unfavourable growth conditions.

406

Microbiology, 142, 817-827

407

Deraz, S.F., El-Fawal, G.F., Abd-Ellatif, S.A., Khalil, A.A. (2011). Autohydrolysed

408

Tilapia nilotica Fish Viscera as a Peptone Source in Bacteriocin Production.

409

Indian Journal of Microbiology, 51(2), 171-175

410

Fakas, S., Papanikolaou, S., Komaitis, M., Aggelis, G. (2008). Organic nitrogen

411

of tomato waste hydrolysate enhances glucose uptake and lipid accumulation in

412

Cunninghamella echinulate. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 105 (4), 70-1062

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

390

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Franz, C.M., Huch, M., Abriouel, H., Holzapfel, W., Gálvez, A. (2011).

414

Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. International

415

Journal of Food Microbiology, 151 (2), 125-140

416

Gänzle, M., Weber, S., Hammes, W. (1999). Effect of ecological factors on the

417

inhibitory spectrum and activity of bacteriocins. International Journal of Food

418

Microbiology, 46, 207–217

419

Gao, M.T., Hirata, M., Toorisaka, E., Hano, T. (2006). Acid-hydrolysis of fish

420

wastes for lactic acid fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 97, 2414–2420

421

Gilmore, M.S., Lebreton, F., van Schaik, W.

422

Enterococci from Gut Commensals to Leading Causes of Multidrug-resistant

423

Hospital Infection in the Antibiotic Era. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 16(1),

424

10-16

425

Goodwin, S., McPherson, J.D., McCombie, W.R. (2016). Coming of age: ten

426

years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nature Reviews Genetics,

427

17, 333-351

428

Hickey, R., Towmey, D., Ross, R., Hell, C. (2003). Production of enterolysin A by

429

a

430

Microbiology, 149, 655-664

431

Hujanen, M., Linko, Y.Y. (1996). Effect of temperature and various nitrogen

432

sources on L(+)-lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei. Applied

433

Microbiology and Biotechnology, 45, 307–313

434

Kanmani, P., Kumar, P.S., Yuvaraj, N., Paari, K.A., Pattukumar, V., Arul, V.

435

(2010). Design and optimization of fermentation medium for enhanced

EP

SC

TE D

M AN U

(2013). Genomic Transition of

enterococcal isolate

exhibiting multiple virulence factors.

AC C

raw milk

RI PT

413

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT bacteriocin production by probiotic bacterium E. faecium MC13. Preparative

437

Biochemistry and Biotechology, 41, 40–5

438

Khan, H., Flint, S., Yu, P. L. (2010). Enterocins in food preservation.

439

International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141(1–2), 1–10

440

Khan, H., Flint, S., Yu, P. L. (2013). Determination of the mode of action of

441

enterolysin A, produced by Enterococcus faecalis B9510. Journal of Applied

442

Microbiology. 115(2) : 484-494

443

Kunji, E.R.S., Mierau, I., Hagting, A., Poolman, B., Konings, W.N. (1996). The

444

proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 70, 187–

445

221

446

Li, Z., Han, L., Ji, Y.Z., Wang, X.N., Tan, T.W. (2010). Fermentative production of

447

L-lactic acid from hydrolysate of wheat bran by Lactobacillus rhamnosus.

448

Biochemical Engineering Journal, 49, 138–142.

449

Line, J.E., Svetoch, E.A., Eruslanov, B.V., Perelygin, V.V., Mitsevich, E.V.,

450

Mitsevich, I.P., Levchuk, V.P., Svetoch, O.E., Seal, B.S., Siragusa, G.R., Stern,

451

N.J. (2008). Isolation and purification of enterocin E-760 with broad

452

antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

453

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 52, 1094–1100

454

Murray, B., Singh, K., Ross, P., Heath, J., Dunny, G., Weinstock, G. (1993).

455

Generation of restriction map of Enterococcus faecalis OG1 and investigation of

456

growth requirements and regions encoding biosynthetic function. Journal of

457

Bacteriology, 175, 5216-5223

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

436

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nigutova, K., Morovsky, M., Prista, P., Teather, R.M., Holo, H. Javorsky, P.

459

(2007). Production of enterolysin A by rumen Enterococcus faecalis strain and

460

occurrence of enlA homologues among ruminal Gram-positive cocci. Journal of

461

Applied Microbiology, 102, 563-569

462

Nilsen, T., Ingolf, F., Helge, H. (2003). Enterolysin A, a cell wall-degrading

463

bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecalis LMG 2333. Applied and Environmental

464

Microbiology, 69(5) : 2975-2984

465

Pieniz, S., Andreazza, R., Anghinoni, T., Camargo, F., Brandelli, A., 2014.

466

Probiotic potential, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Enterococcus

467

durans strain LAB18s. Food Control. 37, 251–256

468

Sahl, H.G., Bierbaum, G. (1998). Lantibiotcis: biosynthesis and biological

469

activities of uniquely modified peptides from Gram-positive bacteria. Annual

470

Review of Microbiology, 52 : 41-79

471

Spellman, D., McEvoy, E., O'Cuinn, G., FitzGerald, G.R.J. (2003). Proteinase

472

and exopeptidase hydrolysis of whey protein: Comparison of the TNBS, OPA

473

and pH stat methods for quantification of degree of hydrolysis. International

474

Dairy Journal, 13, 447-453.

475

Stein, I.A., Svein, J.H., Vincent, G.H.E. (2005a). Hydrolysates from Atlantic cod

476

(Gadus morhua L.) viscera as components of microbial growth media. Process

477

Biochemistry, 40, 3714–3722

478

Stein, I.A., Svein, J.H., Vincent, G.H.E. (2005b). Use of hydrolysates from

479

Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) viscera as a complex nitrogen source for lactic

480

acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letter, 248, 65–68

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

458

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Van Heel, A.J., de Jong, A., Montalbán-López, M., Kok, J., Kuipers, O.P. (2013).

482

BAGEL3: Automated identification of genes encoding bacteriocins and (non-

483

)bactericidal posttranslationally modified peptides. Nucleic Acids Research, 41,

484

448-453

485

Van’t Hof, W., Veerman, E.C.I., Helmerhorst, E.J., Amerongen, A.V.N. (2001).

486

Antimicrobial peptides: properties and applicability. Biological Chemistry, 382,

487

597–619

488

Vázquez, J.A., González, M.P., Murado, M.A. (2004). A new marine medium:

489

Use of different fish peptones and comparative study of the growth of selected

490

species of marine bacteria. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 35, 385-392

491

Vázquez, J.A., Montemayor, M.I., Fraguas, J., Murado, M.A. (2009). High

492

production of hyaluronic and lactic acids by Streptococcus zooepidemicus in

493

fed-batch culture using commercial and marine peptones from fishing by-

494

products. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 44, 125–130

495

Vincent, D., Roy, D., Mondou, F., Dery, C. (1998). Characterization of

496

bifidobacteria by random DNA amplification. International Joural of Food

497

Microbiology, 43, 185-193

498

Yu, L., Lei, T., Ren, X., Pei, X., Feng, Y. (2008). Response surface optimization

499

of L-(+)-lactic acid production using corn steep liquor as an alternative nitrogen

500

source by Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1466. Biochemical Engineering

501

Journal, 39, 496–502

502

Zhang, J., Gresham, R. (1999). Chemically defined media for commercial

503

fermentations. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51, 407–21

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

481

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 504

Zheng, L., Lu, H., Yizhi, J., Xiaonan, W., Tianwei, T. (2010). Fermentative

505

production of L-lactic acid from hydrolysate of wheat bran by Lactobacillus

506

Rhamnosus.

Engineering

Journal,

49(1),

42-13

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Biochemical

23

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1: Proteolytic enzymes used to hydrolyze fish proteins.

Raw material used

Enzyme

Reaction conditions

pH

T (°C)

Time (min)

8

50

90

Squid (muscle)

Esperase

20.12

SQAP

Squid (muscle)

45.98

8

50

90

SQTR

Squid (muscle)

Alkaline protease Trypsin

21.50

8

37

90

SHAP

Alkaline protease Neutral protease Autohydrolyzed Trypsin

13.47

8

50

90

9.67

7.5

50

90

ND

7.5

40

360

FGTR

P. vannamei (tails, carapace and heads) P. vannamei (tails, carapace and heads) P. vannamei (heads and carapace) Fish gelatin

10.90

9

38

360

SHPR

P. notialis (muscle)

Protamex

6.68

7.5

50

90

SHEE

AC C

EP

TE D

ND: Not determined

M AN U

SHNP

RI PT

SQES

SC

Sample designation

Degree of Hydrolysis (%)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2: Composition of the culture media tested based on MRS (g/L) b

MRS

MRS

Yeast extract

4

4

4

4

Meat extract

8

8

8

8

Glucose

20

20

20

20

Sodium acetate

5

5

5

5

Tween 80 (mL)

1

1

1

1

Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate

2

2

2

2

Ammonium citrate

2

2

2

2

Mangnesium sulfate

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Manganese sulfate

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

10

-

-

-

-

-

10

20

Peptone Seafood peptones

M AN U

MRS

EP

TE D

MRS: Man Rogosa and Sharpe (standard culture media). MRS : Man Rogosa and Sharpe without peptone. a MRS : MRS supplemented with one fold protein hydrolysates b MRS : MRS supplemented with two-fold protein hydrolysates

AC C

RI PT

a

MRS

SC

-

Composition

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 3 : Comparison of growth of E.faecalis DM19 and pH in the media with Seafood Protein Hydrolysates (SPHs). Seafood peptones

MRS

MRS

-

SQES

SQAP

SQTR

1f

4.62

4.55

4.56

4.56

4.57

2f

4.62

4.55

4.69

4.74

4.71

1f

1.58

1.65

1.64

1.64

1.63

2f

1.58

1.65

1.51

1.46

1.49

SHAP

c,A

1.65±0.01

c,A

1.65±0.01

1f

1.81±0.01

2f

1.81±0.01

g,A

2.01±0.02

de,A

1.83±0.02

M AN U

(Growth data) OD600

a,A

1.95±0.01

b,B

1.83±0.02

c,B

2.11±0.01

a,A

1.94±0.00

SHEE

FGTR

SHPR

4.58

4.62

4.57

4.60

4.56

4.66

4.80

4.81

4.79

4.79

1.62

1.58

1.63

1.60

1.64

1.54

1.4

1.39

1.41

1.41

SC

Final pH

∆pH

SHNP

RI PT

Parameters studied

c,B

1.74±0.01

b,A

1.67±0.01 -

e,A

1.81±0.01

c,A

1.80±0.01

e,B

1.82±0.01

d,A

c,A

0.64±0.01

f,B

f,A

2.02±0.01

de,A

1.73±0.01

1.69±0.02 1.70±0.01

a,A

AC C

EP

TE D

Legends for Seafood Protein Hydrolysates (SQES, SQAP, etc.) and composition of culture media (MRS and MRS ) are shown in Table 1 and 2, respectively. 1f: media supplemented with one-fold protein hydrolysates 2f: media supplemented with two-fold protein hydrolysates Different letters (a,b,c…) in the same line indicate significant differences among the different samples at the same concentration (1f or 2f) for the same standard (P≤ 0.05). Different letters (A,B) in the same column indicate significant differences between two concentrations of seafood peptone (1f and 2f) in the same medium for the same standard (P≤ 0.05).

d,B

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 4 : Effect of culture media supplemented with SPHs (cell free supernatants) on consumption of protein and glucose and production of organic acids by E. faecalis DM19.

h,A

MRS -S

6.95±0.25

SQES-S

47.74±0.69

SQAP-S

44.03±0.95

SQTR-S

39.43±0.07

SHAP-S

13.16±0.17

h,A

i,A

6.95±0.25

a,A

47.43±0.07

c,B

67.50±0.54

e,B

64.74±0.69

46.46±0.85

b,B

49.55±0.16

SHNP-S

40.56±0.30

d,B

58.82±0.06

SHEE-S

40.58±0.11

d,B

64.03±0.13

FGTR-S

37.75±0.11

f,B

46.53±0.62

SHPR-S

37.91±0.18

f,B

66.20±0.68

d,A

0.21±0.06

bcd,A

0.35±0.21

f,A

0.51±0.07

a,A

0.58±0.14

c,A

abcd,A

1f 5.14±0.08

a,A

4.58±0.11

0.35±0.21

b,c,B

0.08±0.01

abc,A

0.06±0.01

a,A

0.25±0.11

bcd,A

0.03±0.01

0.84±0.13

e,A

0.38±0.17

d,A

0.24±0.11

c,A

0.65±0.28

g,A

0.49±0.01

b,A

0.50±0.28

c,B

ab,B

c,B

cd,A

0.26±0.03

ab,A

0.10±0.13

bcd,A

abcd,A

2f

abc,A

0.21±0.06

e,A

de,B

5.37±0.40

c,B

6.30±0.28

f,A

5.87±0.37

g,A

4.06±0.18

d,A

4.17±0.24

bcd,A

5.20±0.18

a,A

3.99±0.25

5.14±0.08 4.58±0.11

7.35±0.23

7.68±0.08

8.46±0.61

d,B

8.46±0.61

c,B

7.95±0.06

b,B

8.16±0.23

de,B

6.19±0.01

a,B

8.44±0.18

5.65±0.13

6.56±0.11

bc,B

7.14±0.20

bc,B

5.24±0.20

bc,B

7.70±0.30

0.08±0.01

1f

e,B

5.20±0.11

ab,A

0.16±0.08

f,A

Acetic acid production (g/L)

RI PT

g,A

2f

SC

-

13.16±0.17

1f

Lactic acid production (g/L)

TE D

MRS-S

2f

EP

1f

Protein consumption (%)

M AN U

Glucose consumption (%)

AC C

Supernatant

b,A

f,A

2f

1f 0.05±0.03

f,A

0.04±0.01

de,A

0.07±0.01

c,A

0.06±0.01

de,A

0.06±0.04

b,A

0.07±0.01

c,A

0.07±0.01

a,A

0.08±0.01

e,A

0.07±0.01

b,A

0.07±0.01

4.06±0.18 5.63±0.07

c,B

6.30±0.28

f,B

5.46±0.07

cd,B

6.90±0.28

bc,B

6.26±0.33

a,B

8.64±0.11

de,B

5.16±0.35

a,A

7.37±0.48

5.11±0.16

bc,A

5.43±0.42

ab,A

6.85±0.13

e,A

4.61±0.28

a,A

6.68±0.08

2f

cd,A

5.87±0.37

ef,B

a,A

Formic acid production (g/L)

a,A

0.05±0.03

bc,A

a,A

0.04±0.01

a,A

0.08±0.01

a,B

0.09±0.01

a,A

0.09±0.01

c,A

ab,A

a,A

a,A

a,A

0.07±0.01

abc,A

a,A

0.08±0.01

a,A

0.09±0.01

a,A

0.05±0.01

a,A

0.10±0.03

ab,A

a,A

bc,A

a,A

“-S”: cell free supernatant after growing E. faecalis DM19 in different culture media. Legends for Seafood Protein Hydrolysates origin (SQES, SQAP, etc.) and composition of culture media (MRS and MRS ) are shown in Table 1 and 2, respectively. (1f): media supplemented with one-fold protein hydrolysates and (2f): media supplemented with two-fold protein hydrolysates. Different letters (a,b,c…) in the same column indicate significant differences among different samples at the same concentration (1f or 2f) for the same standard (P≤ 0.05). Different letters (A,B) in the same line indicate significant differences between the two concentrations of seafood peptone (1f and 2f) in the same medium for the same standard (P≤ 0.05).

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 5 : Antimicrobial activity of cell free supernatants from E.faecalis DM19 grown in different modified culture media. Results are expressed as diameters of the inhibition zone in mm .(na : no antimicrobial activity) MRS-S

SHEE-S

FGTR-S

SHPR-S

2f

1f

2f

1f

2f

1f

8.0±0.1b

na

6.3±0.3c

na

6.1±0.1c

na

7.8±0.4b

na

na

na

6.9±0.4bc,BC

na

6.4±0.1cd,CD

na

6.3±0.1cd,CDE

7.4±0.1AB

5.7±0.2d,DE

7.4±1.0b,B

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

5.9±0.6c,C

na

na

11.6±0.2d

na

9.1±0.3e

na

13.0±0.2c

na

5.9±1.0b

na

na

na

na

na

na

15.8±1.7a,A

na

8.6±0.0e,E

6.5±0.3b,F

10.4±0.1d,D

na

15.0±0.4ab,AB

7.1±0.7a

na

5.7±0.1b

na

6.3±0.0b

na

Clostridium perfringens

7.4±0.5bcd

na

6.6±0.1d

na

na

na

Debaryomyces hansenii

18.7±1.8a

na

12.4±0.1bc

na

9.3±2.1de

na

Enterococcus faecium

9.6±1.8a

na

6.5±0.1b

na

7.0±0.7b

na

Escherichia coli

7.0±0.2b

na

na

na

na

Lactobacillus helveticus

9.0±0.1a,A

na

8.4±0.9ab,AB

na

Listeria monocytogenes

9.0±0.8e,F

na

13.0±0.7b,B

na

na

5.7±0.1a,C

6.2±0.4c,C

na

Pseudomonas fluorescens

6.6±1.2a

na

na

Salmonella cholerasuis

9.0±0.2a

na

na

15.0±2.8a,A

na

6.6±0.0c,C

8.1±1.0a

na

17.2±0.2a,A

Bifidobacterium bifidum Brochothrix thermosphacta Citrobacter frenduii

Penicillium expansum

Shewanella putrefaciens Shigella sonnei Staphyloccus aureus Vibrio parahaemolyticus Yersinia enterocolitica

na

6.2±0.2c

11.8±0.3d na

na

10.2±0.1d,D

6.2±0.0b

na

6.3±0.3b

7.3±0.1bcd

na

na

9.6±1.0de

na

11.2±1.0cd

7.4±0.2b

na

8.8±0.3a

na

6.2±0.2c

na

na

7.5±0.6bc,BC

na

6.8±0.1c,C

na

7.3±0.8c,C

8.6±0.8e,F

na

8.4±0.7e,F

na

11.8±0.4cd,CD

5.7±0.0c,C

6.8±0.3a,C

7.1±0.1b,B

6.0±0.3a,C

7.1±0.6b,B

na

na

na

na

na

6.2±0.1ab

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

10.5±0.0b,B

7.6±0.2b,C

11.2±0.1b,B

6.0±0.1b,C

10.7±0.1b,B

6.6±0.1b

na

na

na

8.0±0.9a

na

7.5±0.6ab

na

11.4±0.2f,F

na

11.2±0.4f,F

na

13.9±0.1c,C

na

13.1±0.2d,D

8.2±0.4b

na

6.0±0.2f

na

7.2±0.0cd

na

8.8±0.1a

na

6.6±0.3e

na

na

na

na

8.5±0.3b

na

7.6±0.6cd

na

7.5±0.5cd

M AN U

Bacillus coagulans

TE D

Bacillus cereus

EP

Aspergillus niger

AC C

Aeromonas hydrophila

2f

RI PT

1f

SC

Microorganism

SHNP-S

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

MRS-S

SQAP-S

SQTR-S

SHAP-S

2f

1f

2f

1f

2f

1f

2f

8.0±0.1b

na

9.3±0.3a

na

6.2±0.1c

na

6.6±0.3c

na

6.3±0.4c

na

na

6.5±0.1c,C

na

5.7±0.1d,E

na

7.7±1.0a,A

na

7.4±0.2ab,AB

7.4±1.0b,B

na

na

6.5±0.0BC

10.2±0.6a,A

na

5.6±0.3c,C

na

na

na

na

14.4±0.9b

na

17.2±0.7a

na

8.7±0.3e

na

13.9±0.5b

Bifidobacterium bifidum

6.00±1.0b

na

6.2±0.1b

na

8.2±0.1a

na

na

na

na

Brochothrix thermosphacta

15.8±1.7a,A

7.0±0.5a,F

14.2±0.1bc,BC

6.4±0.2F

10.0±0.1d,D

na

13.5±0.9c,C

7.0±0.3b,F

9.6±0.1de,DE

7.1±0.7a

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

Clostridium perfringens

7.4±0.5bcd

na

8.7±0.3a

Debaryomyces hansenii

18.7±1.8a

na

14.6±1.9b

Enterococcus faecium

9.6±1.8a

na

6.7±0.4b

Escherichia coli

7.0±0.2b

na

7.1±0.2b

Lactobacillus helveticus

9.0±0.1a,A

na

9.2±0.3a,A

Listeria monocytogenes

9.0±0.8e,F

na

na

5.7±0.3a,C

Pseudomonas fluorescens

6.6±1.2a

na

Salmonella cholerasuis

9.0±0.2a

Citrobacter frenduii

Penicillium expansum

Shewanella putrefaciens Shigella sonnei Staphyloccus aureus Vibrio parahaemolyticus Yersinia enterocolitica

SC

Bacillus coagulans

M AN U

Bacillus cereus

na

8.0±0.0ab

na

7.8±0.1bc

na

7.2±0.9cd

na

12.4±1.0bc

na

11.0±0.8cd

na

8.1±1.4e

na

6.4±0.2b

na

6.7±0.4b

na

7.4±0.2b

na

na

na

8.0±0.3a

na

na

na

7.2±0.3c,C

na

9.0±0.1a,A

6.7±0.7C

6.8±0.5c,C

14.2±0.2a,A

na

11.8±0.2cd,CD

na

12.6±0.1bc,BC

10.2±0.2E

11.4±0.4d,D

5.8±0.3c,C

5.9±0.1a,C

7.4±0.5b,B

na

8.2±0.1a,A

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

TE D

Aspergillus niger

na

na

na

na

na

5.4±0.2b

na

6.1±0.7b

na

6.0±0.1c,C

na

10.0±0.2b,B

na

10.8±0.2b,B

na

6.5±0.5c,C

8.1±1.0a

na

na

na

10.0±0.2b

na

na

na

6.7±0.2b

17.2±0.2a,A

7.2±0.2G

16.4±0.4b,B

na

12.1±0.6e,E

na

15.8±0.1b,B

na

12.8±0.2d,D

8.2±0.4b

na

7.0±0.2de

na

8.5±0.4ab

na

7.6±0.3c

na

6.5±0.2e

na

na

9.3±0.4a

na

7.3±0.3d

na

8.2±0.2bc

na

8.0±0.3bcd

15.0±2.8a,A

AC C

Aeromonas hydrophila

RI PT

1f

EP

Microorganism

SQES-S

Legends for Seafood Protein Hydrolysates origin (SQES, SQAP, etc.) and composition of culture media (MRS and MRS-) are shown in Table 1 and 2, respectively. (1f): media supplemented with one-fold protein hydrolysates and (2f): media supplemented with two-fold protein hydrolysates. Different letters (a,b,c…) in the same column indicate significant differences among different samples at the same concentration (1f or 2f) for the same standard (P<0.05).Different letters (A,B) in the same line indicate significant differences among samples at different concentrations (1f and 2f) for the same standard (P<0.05). ysates (SQES, SQAP, etc.) origin and composition of culture media (MRS and MRS-) are shown in Table 1 and 2, respectively. 1f): media supplemented with one-

Table 6. Bacteriocin genes identified

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Length

Amino acid

(amino acids)

identity (%)

Enterolysin A

343

343/343 (100%)

Lantibiotic I

63

63/63 (100%)

E. faecalis pathogenicity island(AF454824)

Lantibiotic II

68

33/33 (100%)

E. faecalis pathogenicity island(AF454824)

Bacteriocin

Annotation E. faecalis (Q9F8B0)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

UviB-like* 82 54/69 (78%) E. faecalis 20-SD-BW-06 (EPH69978) *UviB-like has not been taken into account as bacteriocin due the amino acid identity is less than 95%

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The influence of SPHs on survival and metabolic activities was investigated

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Hydrolysates from squid and shrimp stimulated Enterococcus faecalis DM19 growth Enterococcus faecalis DM19 produced lactic acid with excellent efficiency

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Antimicrobial activity increased in media with higher amounts of SPHs