Effect of Somatostatin and a Glucagon-Specific Analog on Glucose Homeostasis During Arginine Infusion Eric L Lien The glucose
response
normal
was
rats
glucagon 1
to arginine
studied
deficiency
mg/kg/hr)
ciency
insulin
(somatostatin
or
selective
In control
glucagon
cose
rose
levels
arginine
14
and returned
termination
of
the
increased
136
increased
76 *
Infusion
*
12
pg/ml
administration during associated
glu-
modest
Insulin
levels
demonstrate
during
somatostatin
the
do
infu-
resulted
rise in insulin that
not
arise
cagon-specific
in
produced It
glucagon
of somatostatin
glucagon
and The
[ D-Cys”]somatostatin infusion
of
insulin
release,
ensued.
hyperglycemia.
suppression
to
glucagon
of
arginine
at the
and
arginine-induced
hyperglycemia
levels
to basal KU/ml
marked 1
in response
infusion.
12
of
mg/dl
plasma
of both
and arginine-induced
defi-
infusion,
studies,
supression
in and
infusion,
([D-Cys”]somatostain
mg/kg/hr).
sion.
infusion
during
secretion
release.
These
treated
a
results
the hyperglycemic
somatostatin
in
and effects
in arginine-treated in animals
no
resulted
animals with
glu-
analogs.
T
HE CYCLIC tetradecapeptide somatostatin inhibits the release of numerous hormones, including those from the pituitary (growth hormone’ and prolactin’), the pancreas (insulin” and glucagonl) and the gut (gastrin,’ cholecystokinin.” and secretin’). One potential therapeutic use of somatostatin would be to lower inappropriately high glucagon levels in the diabetic state which may contribute to the hyperglycemia of this disease.’ Studies with insulin dependent diabetics have indicated the ability of somatostatin infusions to lower postabsorppatients. Intive blood glucose levels!‘,“‘and prevent ketosis I1 in insulin-withdrawn fusion of somatostatin in maturity-onset diabetics and normal subjects results in most likely due to suppression of inmodestly elevated blood glucose levels,“-“’ sulin release. The use of glucagon-specific analogs, such as those developed by Brown et al.‘; ([D-Cys”]-somatostatin and [D-Trp’, D-Cys”]-somatostatin), may prevent elevation of blood glucose levels observed after somatostatin infusion. The present studies were undertaken to examine the effects of somatostatin and [D-Cys”]-somatostatin on insulin, glucagon and glucose levels during arginine in normal rats. MATERIALS Male Charles In order
to maintain
was cannulated matostatin @nine
(I I
anesthesia
(I
hourly
AND
injections
of Nembutal.
and rats were treated
mg/kg/hr,
from
six animals)
from
30 60 min. or (3) saline infusion
animals).
Blood samples
and
Metabol/sm,
1.2mg
75.90.
were obtained
and I20 min after
of versene/0.5
Vol 27. No 9 &?ptember).
METHODS
300~ 350 g were anesthetized
30 60 min, (2) [D-Cys”]somatostatin
30 set) 0, 15. 30,45,60, Trasylol
CD rats weighing
for infusions
infusion
7.2) from min
River
with Nembutal,
IO mg/kg.
with one of the following six animals)
from 0 30 min followed from
three
time 0 60 min plus arginine
(I mg/kg/hr. the jugular
(i.p.).
by arginine
vetn
(I) so-
protocols:
(100 mg/kg/hr.
from
vein (a procedure
the start of the infusion
50 mg/kg
were given. The jugular
pH
time 0 60 min plus alone from requiring
in Trasylol-versene
30 60
less than (600 U of
ml of blood).
1978
1095
1096
ERIC L. LIEN
Hormone levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. Insulin was determined by the method of Hales and Randle’” using human insulin standards (Schwarz/Mann) and glucagon was determined by the method of Faloona and Unger19 utilizing Unger 30K glucagon antiserum. Glucose was determined by the glucose-oxidase method. Somatostatin was synthesized by solid-phase methodology:“” [D-Cys”]-somatostatin was a gift of Dr. J. Rivier. RESULTS
During an arginine infusion in control animals plasma glucose increased 14 mg/dl from a mean (‘t SEM) of 79 =t 3 mg/dl during saline infusion to 93 f 4 mg/dl (Fig. 1). After termination of the arginine infusion, glucose returned to basal levels. An unexplained rise of glucose levels to 92 f 3 mg/dl was observed at the termination of the experiment. The combination of somatostatin and arginine infusions resulted in marked hyperglycemia; glucose levels peaked after the cessation of arginine infusion (159 f 17 mg/dl) and did not return to normal until 60 min later. Glucose levels during [D-C~S’~]-somatostatin infusion were similar to control values (Fig. 1) during basal and combined arginine and [D-Cys”]somatostatin administration. Glucose levels did not, however, return to preinfusion levels following termination of the infusion, but instead slowly rose to 113 i 3 mg/dl at the end of the experiment. Plasma insulin levels in control animals responded rapidly during the arginine infusion, increasing 136 i 12 /*U/ml after 15 min of arginine administration (Fig. 2); following the arginine infusion insulin rapidly returned to basal levels. Infusion of somatostatin resulted in a rapid initial drop in insulin levels, a slow rise during the arginine infusion and a marked rebound after the termination of the somatostatin-arginine infusion. [D-Cys”‘]-somatostatin administration resulted in a reduction of basal insulin levels similar to that seen with somatostatin. During the arginine-[D-Cys”]-somatostatin infusion insulin levels rose, but not to the same SRIF
or
D-c~s’~-SRIF
ARGININE
170
l
* I
\
160
150
140
\\ \\ \\ \\
I’ I’
0
30
60 RIINUTES
90
\ 120
Fig. 1. Effect of somatostatin (1 mg/kg/hr) or [D-Cys’4]-somatostatin (1 mg/kg/hr) infusion on plasma glucose during arginine infusion (100 mg/kg/hr). D--O: control (n = 111; e---e: somatostatin (n = 6); x.. .x: [D-Cys”]-somatostatin In = 6). Vertical bars represent SEM; p < 0.01, + p < 0.06. The p values refer to peptide treated animals when compared to saline controls.
GLUCOSE
HOMEOSTASIS
DURING
ARGININE
INFUSION
1097
SRIF or D-ryd4-SRIF ,
ARGININE
,
160,-
Fig.
2.
Effect
mg/kg/hr) (1
or
mg/kg/hr)
sulin
somatostatin on
arginine o---i>:
plasma
infusion control
somatostatin
0.01,
bars + p <
to peptide-treated pared to saline
The
SEM; p values
animals
11);
.x:
x.. (n
represent 0.05.
in(100
(n =
(n = 6):
[ D-Cys14]-somatostatin Vertical
(1
[D-Cys”]-somatostatin infusion
during
mg/kg/hr). e----e:
of
I
when
=
61.
p < refer com-
controls.
extent as when arginine was infused alone. The insulin levels in animals receiving arginine and [D-Cys’)]-somatostatin were significantly higher than somatostatinand arginine-treated animals (p < 0.01 at 45 and 60 min), and significantly lower than animals receiving arginine alone (p < 0.01 at 45 and 60 min). Plasma glucagon levels rose 76 f 16 pg/ml in control animals in response to arginine. The gfucagon levels in animals treated with either somatostatin or [D-Cys’l]-somatostatin were lowered during the basal period (since control levels also declined during this time, no significant differences were noted) and did not increase in response to arginine (Fig. 3). 100
SRIF or D-cyri4SRIF 1
ARCININE
,
Fig.
3.
Effect
mg/kg/hr)
or
(1 mg/kg/hr) cagon mg/kg/hr.
somatostatin
infusion
during
e----e:
of
on
arginine
~i--:~:
control
somatostatin
Vertical
bars + p <
to peptide-treated pared
to saline
= 11); x..
In The
SEM: p
animals
controls.
glu(100
(n
(n = 6);
represent 0.05.
plasma
infusion
[D-Cys”]-somatostatin 0.01,
(1
[II-Cys”]-somatostatin
.x:
= 6). p <
values refer when
com-
1098
ERIC L. LIEN
DISCUSSION
The present study was undertaken to determine the effects of suppression of glucagon and insulin release (by somatostatin) and the selective suppression of glucagon (by [D-Cys”]-somatostatin) on the arginine-induced elevation of blood glucose. Previous studies have demonstrated the diabetogenic action of somatostatin during arginine tolerance tests in normal humans and maturity-onset diabetics.12 The same type of prolonged hyperglycemia was found when somatostatin and arginine were infused simultaneously in rats (Fig. 1). The arginine-stimulated rise of insulin and glucagon was blocked by somatostatin, as seen in Figs, 2 and 3: however, the decrease in insulin was mare pronounced than in glucagon. Hyperglycemia was probably a result of the relative excess of glucagon, capable of stimulating both glycogenolysis” and gluconeogenesis,” and a reduced rate of glucose clearance due to lowered insulin levels. Somatostatin and [D-Cys”]-somatostatin differ in their ability to suppress pancreatic hormone secretion; Brown et al. found the analog to be more potent than somatostatin in inhibiting glucagon release, while it only weakly inhibited inobvious in this study: alsulin release.” This relative specificity was immediately though the arginine-induced glucagon release was completely inhibited, insulin levels were intermediate between those of controls and somatostatin-treated animals. Following the infusion, glucagon levels rebounded while insulin levels rose modestly (not as severe a rebound as with somatostatin), and a mild elevation of glucose levels ensued. The ability of somatostatin infusion to lower blood glucose!‘.‘” and prevent ketoacidosis” in insulin-withdrawn juvenile diabetics has previously been demonstrated. Less desirable results were obtained when somatostatin was infused in normals or in maturity-onset diabetics. Prolonged somatostatin infusion in normal postabsorptive humans’“,‘+ and maturity-onset diabetics’” resulted in a transient fall in glucose levels followed by a sustained rise to levels significantly greater than the basal values. Somatostatin infusion also decreased the glucose utilization rate following intravenous glucose tolerance tests in humans.“?,‘” Arginine tolerance tests in normal humans during somatostatin infusions have produced several responses. Gerich et al.4 found no increase in glucose levels during infusions of arginine plus somatostatin, but the infusions were followed by hyperglycemia. The dose of somatostatin employed was sufficient to suppress arginine-induced insulin and glucagon release (glucagon levels actually decreased transiently during the infusion); a glucagon rebound followed the termination of the somatostatin infusion. Changes observed in the glucose levels were probably mediated by changes in the glucagon levels: both parameters were suppressed during the arginine-somatostatin infusion, and rebounded following the infusion (insulin remained unchanged during the experiment). WaldhPusl et al.,” employing a higher dose of arginine and a lower dose of somatostatin, found concomitant administration of arginine and somatostatin resulted in prolonged hyperglycemia when compared to the administration of arginine alone. Somatostatin infusion completely suppressed arginine-stimulated insulin release, while glucagon rose slightly. The relative excess of giucagon, stimulating hepatic glucose output, coupled with lowered glucose clearance due to suppressed insulin levels probably resulted in the observed hyperglycemia (results similar to those in the present study). Administration of arginine and [D-Cys’4J-somatostatin in the present
GLUCOSE
HOMEOSTASIS
DURING
ARGININE
INFUSION
1099
study did not result in elevated glucose levels, although the insulin response was attenuated. The absence of hyperglycemia in this experiment is therefore most likely due to complete suppression of the glucagon response. Since glucose and pancreatic hormone levels react similarly to combined somatostatin and arginine infusions in rats (present experiment) and in normal humans and maturity-onset diabetics,” the result with glucagon specific somatostatin analogs should apply to humans. Glucagon levels of maturity-onset diabetics are inappropriately elevated in response to a number of stimuli. Although a large carbohydrate load reduced glucagon levels in normals, it failed to do so in maturity-onset diabetics despite marked hyperglycemia.‘” Prolonged arginine infusion resulted in excessive glucagon levels in maturity-onset diabetics when compared to contro1s,L4.‘)” and insulin failed to lower arginine-stimulated glucagon levels.“’ Although [D-Cys”]somatostatin does inhibit basal insulin release in addition to its potent suppression of arginine-stimulated glucagon release, an analog with even greater glucagon specificity is expected to selectively reduce glucagon levels in maturity-onset diabetics in both the basal and stimulated states, and thus improve glucose homeostasis. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I wish to thank Gerald
Deitch and Ruth Gillis for their excellent
technical
assistance
REFERENCES I. Brazeau P. Vale W. Burgus R. et al: Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the secre~ton of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone. Science 179:77-79. 1973 2. Yen SSC, Silver TM. DeVane GV: Effect of somatostatin in patients with acromegaly. N Engl J Med 290:935~ 938. 1974 3. Alberti KGMM, Christensen NJ, Christensen SE, et al: Inhibition of insulin secretion by somatostatin. Lancet 2:1299-- 1301, 1973 4. Gerich JE, Lorenzi M. Schneider J, et al: Inhibition of pancreatic glucagon responses to arginine by somatostatin in normal man and insulin-dependent diabetics. Diabetes 23:876 880. 1974 5. Raptis S. Doliinger HC, van Berger L, et al: Effects of somatostatin on gastric secretion and gastrin release in man. Digestion 13: IS 26, lY75 6. Schlegel W, Raptis S. Harvey RIF, et al: inhibition of cholecystokinin-pancreozymin release by somatostatin. Lancer 2-166-168, 1977 7. Hanssen LE, Hanssen KF, Myren J: Inhibition of secretin release and pancreatic bicarbonate secretion by somatostatin infusion in man. Stand J Gastroenterol 12:391-394, 1977 X. Unger RH, Orci L: The essential role of glucagon in the pathogenesis of dtabetes mellitus. Lancet I:14 16, 1975 9. Gerich JE, Lorenzi M. Schneider V. et al: Effects of somatastatin on plasma glucose and
glucagon levels rn human diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 29 I :544 547, 1974 IO. DelGuercio MJ. di Natele B. Gargantini L, et al: Etfect of somatostatin on blood sugar. plasma growth hormone and glucagon levels in diabetic children. Diabetes 25550 553. 1976 I I. Gerich JE, Lorenzi M. Bier DM. et al: Prevention of human diabetic ketoacidosis by somatostatin. N Engl J Med 292:985 989, 1975 12. Waldhausl W, Bratusch-Marrain P, Dudczak R, et al: The diabetogenic action of somatostatin in healthy subjects and in maturity onset diabetics J Clin Endocrinol Metab 44:876 883, I977 13. Sherwin RS. Hendler R. De Franz0 R. et al: Glucose homeostasts during prolonged suppression of glucagon and insulin secretion hy somatostatin. Proc Nati Acad Sci LISA 74:348 352, lY77 14. Lins PE. Efendic S: Hyperglycemia induced by somato\tatin in normal subjects. Horm Metab Res 8:497 498, 1976 15. Tamborlane WV. Sherwin RS, Hendler R. et al: Metabolic effects of sumatostatin in maturity-onset dtabetics. N Engl J Med 797: 181 183, I977 16. Leblanc H. Anderson JR. Sigel MB, et al: Inhibitory action of somatostatin on pancreatic o and 0 cell functron. .J Clin Endocrinol Metah 40:568- 572, 1975
1100
17. Brown M, Rivier J, Vale W: Somatostatin: analogs with selected biological activities. Science 196:146771469, 1977 18. Hales CN, Randle PJ: Immunoassay of insulin with insulin antibody precipitate. Biochem J 88:137-148, 1963 19. Faloona GR, Unger RH: Glucagon, in Jaffe BM, Behrman HR (eds): Methods of Hormone Radioimmunoassay. New York, Academic Press, 1974 20. Rivier JEF: Somatostatin. Total solid phase synthesis. J Am Chem Sot 96:2986-2992, 1974 21. Salter JM, Ezrm C, Laidlaw JC, et al: Metabolic effects of glucagon in human subjects. Metabolism 9:753-768, 1960 22. Exton JH, Mallette LE, Jefferson LS, et
ERIC L. LIEN
al: The hormonal control of hepatic gluconeogenesis. Recent Prog Horm Res 26:41 l-461, 1970 23. Miiller WA, Falona GR, Aguilar-Parada E, et al: Abnormal alpha-cell function in diabetes. N Engl J Med 283:109-l 15, 1970 24. Palmer JP, Bensen JW, Walter RM, et al: Arginine-stimulated acute phase of insulin and glucagon secretion in diabetic subjects. J Clin Invest 58565-570, 1976 25. Aronoff SL. Bennett PH. Rushforth NB. et al: Arginine-stimulated hyperglucagonemia in diabetic Pima Indians. Diabetes X:404-407. 1976 26. Raskin P, Audin I, Unger RH: Effect ofinsulin on the exaggerated glucagon response lo arginine stimulation in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 25~227-229. 1976