PergBlllOIl
Chenwsphcre. Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. bW-b26, 1996 Copyright 8 1996 Ekvier Science Ltd Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved 004%6535/96 $15.00+0.00
?45-6535(95)00345-2
Effect of temperature sorption
on sorption
equilibrium
kinetics of organic micropollutants
RIZA,
Th.E.M.
ten Hulscher’
P.O.Box
17, 8200
(Received in Gemany
and
- a review
and G. Cornelissen
AA Lelystad,
The Netherlands
I June 1995; accepted 30 October 1995)
Abstract
Temperature environmental sorption slow
is an important
processes.
equilibrium
process
In the present
and sorption
can
be
decreases
with
increasing
temperature
on the rates of fast adsorption In Literature structures
the present on
with increasing
the
paper,
effect
is summarized.
reported
values
diffusion
of organic
and desorption
of
the slow
Activation
for the activation micropollutants
causes nonequilibrium
sorption
on
the
energies
energy
step
of temperature
equilibrium
Calculated
of on
A fast and a
equilibrium
equilibrium
sorption
sorption
with
were also found. activation
of no influence
is assumed
diffusion
energies
of temperature
to be a diffusion
of organic
for diffusion
of slow
through
examples
rates
were reported.
desorption
temperature
of increasing
temperature.
and
is presented.
compounds,
on sorption
Also,
equilibria
the influence
most
examples
kJ/mol.
of
the
micropollutants For
of temperature
were in the range of lo-50
influence
a review
sorption. Some
and of no effect increased
can
for organic
for
temperature.
The rate of fast desorption
that
paper,
kinetics
distinguished
increasing
for desorption
parameter
compounds
in polymers
desorption
average
are comparable
organic polymers.
process.
in polymeric
60 kJ/mol.
to those
This is an indication
found
The for
that diffusion
effects.
Introduction
The sorption
of hydrophobic
organic
and terrestrial
environment.
It affects
the availability
for uptake,
degradation,
compounds
the transport
is an important
of these
and volatilization.
609
process
compounds
Many
factors
in both the aquatic
in aquatic
systems
can influence
and
the extent
610 and rate of the sorption the organic term
carbon
“sorption”
“solute”
content is used
influence
of the
existence
of
1979;
Steinberg
sorption.
The
diffusion
(Brusseau
combination
which
most
and
kinetics
paper
and
and
equilibrium The
the
sorption
summarizes of
the properties
experimental and activation
of the
The data dependence
of the
used
coated
silica was
matter
Rao, diffusion
structure. Therefore,
1989)
or a
along the
diameters.
Intra-
matter
matrix,
The latter
process
attention
is given
to
summarized
and
effect
on
interpreted
in
variation sorption
is
terms
of
kinetics.
variation
at room temperature
e.g.:
of temperature
process the type
on sorption (20-25OC) could
also
equilibrium
and
to environmental be used to reveal
of sorptive
interactions
and
matter.
for the
(Matzner
If necessary,
present
equilibrium
and materials
silica
intra-organic
organic
temperature
of sorption
involved,
on
for slow
slow
the
et
of temperature
to solute
through
the
on the sorption
process
processes:
Karickhoff
is responsible
and
on the effect
of temperature
of temperature
effect
equilibrium
materials.
of
are
1989;
and
comparable
literature
energies
(delayed
Brusseau
materials.
theory
obtained
the
and interpretation
of the
porous
values
two
polymer
data
influence
to translate
polymer
The
available
of the organic
Data selection
sorption.
to soils and sediments,
process
macromolecular
the available
the
on the
1991 b;
in and diffusion
through
describes
on sorption
diffusion
diameters
through
enthalpies
information
Rao,
and heterogeneous
term
Pignatello,
rate-limiting
can involve
with
on diffusion
The influence
(thermodynamic)
and
penetration
of diffusion
understanding
temperatures.
in pores
flexible
kinetics
is important
sediments
diffusion
the process
equilibrium
explained
Micropore
of temperature
The present on
two.
1989;
micropore
the
The
fractions
literature
paper,
process.
desorbing
any
pH, salts),
at equilibrium.
chemicals
and Rao,
are
Brusseau
involves
and
is hardly
explanations
hindrance
of organic
(humics,
In the present
of temperature
It is not clear which
1991a;
of a rather
may resemble the influence
There
phase
processes
in the sorption
influence
(Brusseau
et al.,
diffusion
consists
1987).
processes.
steric
matter
the
sorbing
reported
surface
involved
with
slowly
plausible
of these
walls
organic
et al,
and
For the sorption
and been
of sorptive
partitioning
dealing
of the water
or soil, and the temperature.
the compound
fast
has often
the kinetics
for
equilibrium.
both
achievement)
pore
both
literature
on sorption
i.e. the composition
of the sediment
is used to describe
Most
al.,
to sediments
and
study the
kinetics
closely
resembling
and Bales,
1994)
(Szecsody
and Bales,
calculations
include
the ones
of the
sorption
soil or sediment.
was
not taken
which
into
reported
of organic
For example, account,
on the temperature compounds
a study
whereas
to soils,
carried
a study
out on
on phenyl
1991).
of sorption
enthalpies
or activation
energies
were
carried
out by
611 the present these
authors.
calculations
The legends have
been
underneath
carried
out.
reported
values,
giving
different
solutes,
these were averaged
Temperature
The partition usually
reference
dependence
short term
coefficient
solubility
of the compounds
nonpolar
The variation
partitioning:
thermodynamic
quantities
when the free energy
AG”
When
chemicals
are overall
a reference
carbon.
studied
Gibbs give
The
(Hassett
organics
reports
ways
averages
of
more values
for
of the overall average
(Hassett
assumption
linear
isotherms
value.
insight
in the
exchange
Karickhoff
up to
and water.
60
to
80%
K, is
isotherm
has
1979).
The
et al.,
of the
about the thermodynamic
(AH"),and entropy
(AGO), enthalpy sorption
sediment
by a linear
water
1989).
gives information
energy
described
of a linear sorption
1989;
and Banwart,
free
is often
ratio between
and Banwart,
shows
of the sorptive
in sediment
the concentration
of K, with temperature
of equilibrium
AG” is related to
of organic
researchers
of many
cases and in what
in the tables
before use in the calculation
per unit of organic
sorption
values
in which
of sorption equilibrium
sorption
by several
Average
equal weight.
K,, which describes
expressed
been tested
each
the tables indicate
process
is negative
involved.
(Hassett
quantities (AS”).
A net sorption
and Banwart,
These occurs
1989).
AH" and AS” through
= AH"
in which:
- TM"
AG” = change
(1)
in Gibbs free energy
(kJ- mol.‘)
AH“ = change in enthalpy (kJ. mol.‘1 AS” = change
At equilibrium,
K, (expressed
in entropy
in mol fraction
(kJ. mol“-K.‘)
units)
is related
to the standard
free energy
change
by:
AG”
= -RT/n
in which:
K,”
(2)
R
= gas constant
T
= absolute
(8.31441
temperature
K,” = mol fraction
combination
change
. K-‘. mol.‘)
(K)
based partition
(mol water/mol
The enthalpy
. 1O-3 kJ
organic
coefficient
carbon)
(AH")can thus be obtained from the variation of K, with temperature,
of equations
1 and 2 (equation
3).
AH" is independent
of the units of K,.
i.e. by
612
d lnKJd(l/T)
= -AH”/R
Two types of driving forces that affect solvent
the relative
affinity
and entropy-related
ment/water
system
Examples induced increasing
solute
related
dipole
molecular
the
dissolved
1989).
The entropy-related
nature
forces
of a covalent disorder
force
are:
bond).
and
in the sediment (mixing
of itself, the former
phase
der Waals
disorder
As the undisturbed
force in the
and
water
Banwart,
in the organic
organic
force is much stronger
with
interactions
of the highly structured
is the increasing
(weak
increase
dipole-dipole
Hassett
entropy).
forces
that
1972;
entropy-related
of the sedi-
The entropy-related
Thompson,
to the
1989).
matrix
ligand exchange,
chemical
(Hamaker
or disorder
London-van and organic
forces
of the chemical
and Banwart,
due to the disappearance
chemical
enthalpy-related
in randomness
solute
bonds,
process:
vs. the affinity
Hassett
between
hydrogen
matrix that results from solute inclusion highly disordered
1972;
adsorption
weight),
(the formation
around
include the change
interactions
phase is the increasing
mantle
to the sorbent
and Thompson,
of enthalpy
and chemisorption aqueous
ones that
(Hamaker
dipole-induced
can play a role in the sorption
of a chemical
matrix has a
than the latter
one. For hydrophobic behind the sorption of London-Van resulting
process
der Waals
forces
polar group
that
the
additional
equilibrium
contribution
of temperature For weaker
sorption
are presented.
matrix.
According
for
solubility
to the sorption
on the sorption
bonds,
tables,
organic
or that organic
(Hamaker,
can donate
Hamaker is a direct
of temperature
main
driving
and the large entropy
chemicals.
matrix
enthalpy.
the
force
a term used for the combination
and sediment
equilibrium
less influence
literature
1 data
data on the effect
are presented
and
1972).
change
The other
For chemicals or accept
the
solute
and Thompson indication
is expected
to Chiou et al.( 1979) for which
but
of PCB-congeners whereas
solubility
for compounds
sorption
increased
decreases
is in contrast
(Tateya
sorption
of temperature that
that may show electrostatic
values for equilibrium
1 ,l ,l-trichloroethane
temperatures,
sorption”,
groups,
with a
a hydrogenprovides (1972)
an state
of the strength
because
of
of the lower
enthalpy.
In table
The average
the
polar
from the solution
electrostatically between
Table 2 deals with compounds
for compounds
solute
of the sorbing chemical
interaction
In the following
sorption.
any
“hydrophobic
between
are able to interact
exothermic
the sorption.
is so-called
without
only play a minor role for hydrophobic
electrostatic
that the effect
compounds
interactions
from the removal
adsorption
bond,
organic
et al.,
decreased.
enthalpies
sorption
1988).
the
can only
Solubility
equilibrium hydrophobic
with the sorbent
in both tables.
at higher temperatures
reported
show
interactions
are presented
at higher temperatures. with
on sorption
can be expected
This was observed
temperature
was observed
dependence to increase
by Chiou of the at higher
613 Table
The influence
1.
of temperature
compound
on sorption
equilibrium:
hydrophobic
interactions
AH0
temperature
(kJ*mol”)
range
-17.7’
5-25
soil,
1.08%
-7.1
6.5-37
soil,
1%
-1.7
7.5-37
soil,
3.8
6.5-37
soil,
1.2.3.4~tetrachlorobenzene
-163
24-55
sediment
DDT
-8
5-25
marine
DDT
12
5-25
humic
1,2-dichlorobenzene
-0
3-20
soil,
1,4-dichlorobenzene
-12
to -16
3-48
phenyl
coated
silica
1.6%
oc
-12
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
-13
to 17
3-48
phenyl
coated
silica
1.6%
oc
-12h
1,2,4,5-tetrechlorobenzena
-12
to -25
3-48
phenyl
coated
silica
1.6%
oc
-12
j-HCH
-3s
fluoranthene
naphthalene IO-’ mol/kg
type
of adsorbent’
10.’ mollkg
10.’ mollkg
n.i.’
1
om
n.i.
2
1%
om
n.i.
2
1%
om
n.i.
2
om
y_HCH
20-30
1 O-30
-13
-8%
acid,
peat
22%
clay
6%
peat
22% 6%
silt loam,
2,2’,5,5’-tetrachlorobiphenyl
0
5-33
Aldrich
Aroclor
283
12-22
sediment,
% organic
2References: 5=Jota
and Con”, 3 calculated reliable ’ n.i.
carbon; et
Hassett,
om al.,
1991;
% organic
10 = Weber present
et al.,
study
measurements
matter
Z=Wauchope
6=Szecsody
1992;
= not indicated
=
1995;
in the because
oc
% oc
3
42-66
h
4
42-66
h
4
n.i.
om;
5
h
6
6
h
6
70 h
7
om;
70
7
h
om
1.6%
humic
om
acid
2.61%
oc
n.i.
8
3h
9
24
h
10
-0.25
1 =He
and
2.7%
h
om
clay
3.5-20
VALUE
57
-2
sediment
23’
1254
oc
sediment,
1 ,I ,I trichloro-ethane
=
oc
om
naphthalene
’ oc
ref.’
time
om
naphthalene
AVERAGE
equilibration
IOC)
from have
and
(= et
Bales,
1.7
. ad
el.,
1983;
1991:
3=Wu
7=Mills
and
Gschwend,
and Bigger,
1969;
using
Van
1986; 8=Chiou
4=Pierce et al.,
et 1979;
al.,
1974;
9=Graham
1983 data only
presented been
carried
in the
reference,
out at two
temperatures
the
‘t Hoff
equation;
the
data
are
less
614 The influence
Table 2.
of temperature
AH"
compound
temperature
(kJ.mol
picloram. (pKa
=
pH=4.2
on sorption
‘I
equilibrium:
range
type
possible specific
of adsorbent’
interactions
equilibrat
ref.’
ion tame
(“Cl
-22
15-35
clay
loam,
0.9%
om
24 h
1
loam,
0.9%
om
24 h
1
24
h
1
24 h
1
3.6)
picloram,
pH = 1 .2
-84
1 O-30
clay
picloram,
pH = 7.2
-38
15-35
sandy
plcloram,
pH = 5.9
-17
15-35
silty
pentachlorophenol
-28.6
p-chloroamlww
8 to 27
loam,
loam,
0.7%
3.0%
om
om
2
clay
4-40
soil,
2.49%
<
oc and 8.52%
16h
3
OC
aniline
14to28
4-40
SSlllS
diuron
-14
1 O-40
soil,
diuron
0
5-45
clay,
fluridone
-7 to -15
6-44
soil,
flwdone
1 to 8
6-44
clay,
trlorganotins
0
16-50
sediment,
ametryne
0
5-45
clay,
3.2%
carbofuran
-22
26-50
loam
0.59%
slmazine
0.2
3-50
24 h
9
atrazine
-0.2
to -0.3
0.5-40
2h
9
metolachlor
3to
10
5-28
silt loam,
3.8%
metolachlor
0
5-28
s!lt loam,
0.69%
to -28
0.31-0.85%
3.2%
4%
oc
om
om 1.7%
1.8%
om
om
2.5%
oc
om
same
3
6d
4
24 h
5
24 h
6
24 h
6
3d
7
24
om
-20
oc, 6.4%
oc
oc, 0.74%
5
h
h
3-24
h
8
10
11
24 h
OC
metnbuzin
0
5-28
same
metribuzin
-5 to -9
5-28
silt loam,
AVERAGE
1992;
5=L1u
Thompson,
1972;
3 direct
calorimetric
4 not relevant
3.8%
6.4%
oc
24
h
h
11
10
-8
VALUE
’oc = % organic carbon; or” = % ’References: 1= Biggar and Cheung, al.,
3-24
et al.,
1970;
lO=Graham
organic
matter
and Con”.
measurement
(5 1.7
2 =Xing
6=McCloskey
measurement
for a direct
1973;
and 1992;
oc)
et al.. Bayer,
11 =Chiou
1993;
3 = Moreale
1987; et al.,
7=Tas, 1979
and van 1993;
Bladel,
8=Singh
1979; et al.,
4 =Gonzdlez-Pradas 1994:
9=Hamaker
et and
615
Temperature
dependence
The sorption
kinetics
of fast sorption kinetics
of organic
micropollutants
steps with different
rates: a fast process that reaches
slow
may
process
Brusseau
that
take
and Rao, 1989;
the fast process. fast sorption
months
Pignatello,
The discussion
process.
to 1989).
years Many
in this section
The influence
to
has been shown equilibrium reach
experiments
is restricted
of temperature
within
equilibrium
to occur
in at least two
a minutes to hours, and a (Karickhoff
et
with soil and sediment
to the influence
on the slow sorption
al.,
only study
of temperature process
1979;
on the
is discussed
in
the next section. The temperature an Arrhenius-type
dependence
of the rate of fast adsorption
and desorption
is described
by
equation:
in which:
E”
= activation
energy
for adsorption
or desorption
(kJ. mol.‘) A
= constant
k
= rate constant
(h-l) of fast sorption
(h-‘)
rewritten:
d lnk/d(l/T)
Through
a combination
= -E*/R
of equations
difference
of activation
illustrated
in figure
energies
3 and 5 and defining
for adsorption
K, as kads/kdesit can be shown
and desorption
is the sorption
enthalpy.
that the This is
1.
AH o = E”,,
- E*des
with:
= activation
energy
for adsorption
5 ?? des = activation
energy
for desorption
EX,,,
In table 3, the available sorption
(5)
are presented.
literature
data on the influence
Most data were obtained
in all cases and range between
40 and 50 kJ/mol.
of temperature
for desorption
experiments.
on the kinetics of fast E’-values
are positive
616 Table 3. The influence
of temperature
on fast sorption
kinetics
type
of adsorbent’
E’
temperature
(kJ.mol’I
range
1,2,3,4-tetra-chlorobenzene
63
23-54
sediment,
- 8%
naphthalene
354
15-35
soil,
1 .6%
494
15-35
soil,
1 .6%
-0
3-48
phenyl
compound
adsorption
ref.’
or
desorption
IOCI
desorption
1
oc
desorption
2
oc
desorptlon
2
silica
both
3
stlica
both
3
silica
both
3
silica
both
3
oc
1 d incubation
naphthalene 6 d incubation
1,4-dichlorobenzene
1.6%
1.2.4.trichlorobenzene
-0
phenyl
3-48
1.6%
1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene
oc
1.6%
pentachlorobenzene
coated oc
phenyl
3-48
-0
coated
phenyl
3-48
-0
coated oc
1.6%
coated oc
dichlorobenzenes
175
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorptio”
4
trichlorobenzenes
185
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorption
4
tetrachlorobenzenes
195
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorption
4
pentachlorobenzene
25’
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorption
4
hexachlorobenzene
295
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorptlon
4
hexachlorobutadiene
155
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorption
4
trichlorotoluenes
215
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorption
4
pentachlorotoluene
535
4-40
sediment,
3.9%
oc
desorption
4
AVERAGE
18
’ oc =
VALUE
% organic
’ References:
carbon
1 =Wu
and Gschwand,
3 Calculated
from
a factor
4 Calculated
from
the
difference
’ Calculated
from
%
desorbed
fast
and slow
desorption
1966;
2 difference in time after
Z=Podoll
in desorption needed
930
et al., rates
to desorb
hrs for
1989;
3=Szecsody
over the temperature 70%
3 temperatures.
of naphthalene Influence
and Bates, range added
1991;
4=Oliver,
1985;
studled to the soil for 2 temperatures
of temperature
is caused
by
influence
on both
617 Energy
A
Sorption Progress
Figure 1. Relationship
Temperature
Until rapid
dependence
1980,
most
equilibrium
Karickhoff identify
both
on slow
that were
sorption
and slow sorption
the sorption
the first to study
component have
of organic
by first
order
sorption
in the sorption
been
published.
pollutants
kinetics
process.
These
to sediments
processes
in both
with
sediments
In the past
have
been
as a
directions. and to
15 years
reviewed
many
elsewhere
and Rao, 1989). matter
is probably structure,
matter.
a short
Therefore,
compounds
through
organic
the temperature information
Polymers high degree chains
EXdes
be described
among
kinetics
is a macromolecular
detailed
treated
can
a fast and a slow
Organic
which
of diffusion
researchers
process
et al. (1979)
studies
(Brusseau
AH",ECads, and
between
polymer review
dependence
states:
and freedom,
rigid.
The
the
present
in slow sorption.
may resemble
temperature
is presented
of pore diffusion
on the temperature
of flexibility
determinant
diffusion on
polymers
can exist in two
are relatively
an important
dependence
here.
slow diffusion
dependence Only
a few
was studied.
of
through
the organic
diffusion
studies
could
This section
matrix
of
organic
be found
in
does not present
of pore diffusion.
a high temperature and a low temperature study
As the organic
is concerned
elastomeric glassy with
state
in which
state in which
diffusion
through
there
is a
the polymer elastomeric
618 polymers, (Barrer,
as these
resemble
et al. 1958))
polymer
sorption
the
creation
molecule
in that
hole.
polymers
upon solute penetration
(Hayashi,
et al. 1994;
thus
of a hole It is the
Fujita,
do not preexist.
interactions
between
polymer
formation
the absence
highly positive
The
because
diffusion with
dependence
of organic
which
or more branched rigid (Aminabhavi Diffusion
make
1995).
or as the polymer
activation
energy
Pignatello,
1989):
the
of most
of diffusion 1995)
and
of weak
and/or
whereas
H-bridge
bonds),
Van der Waals
In cases
where
interactions
holes preexist,
they do not. The reason for this is The sorption
water
of organic
the entropy mantle
solutes
to
of sorption
is
around the dissolved
through
polymers
“jump”
from
is controlled
energy
that
space in the polymer
forces in the polymer energy
by the ease
one hole to another. is required matrix,
structure
for the solute
its activation
(Rogers,
1965;
will be larger as the solute is larger,
cohesive
energies
described
by the diffusion
and the
The temperature
are larger or the polymer
in
energy
Stannett,
less flexible
segments
more
1995).
can be quantitatively From
swelling
mesh.
requires
The activation
the
of a solute
and Phayde,
thermodynamically:
of the structured
the
or not;
of two
due to the dissociation
segments.
of hole-creation.
by the activation
As this jump
forces
than in cases where
in the polymer
is governed
and Phayde,
1975).
as well
a sequence
during the process
of the hydrophobic
solute and polymer
on intra- and interchain
Aminabhavi,
(Crank,
because
substances
molecules
of diffusion
will be dependent
of flexibility
accommodation
Aminabhavi
process
(Van der Waals
contribution
disorder
preexist
1994;
is an endothermic
of the disappearance
order to make this jump.
1968;
holes
through
and the
that holes are created
is a process that is highly favoured
solute and the increasing
frequency
whether
to be more exothermic
of the endothermic
organic polymers
is a high degree
proceed
matrix
Sun and Chen,
process
between
to
polymer
indicates
segments
and/or
is expected
there
is regarded
question
Hole creation
is an exothermic
sorption
(in which
in the
1968;
hole occupation H-bridge
matter
in a better way than glassy polymers.
Mechanistically, processes:
organic
temperature
E,’ for diffusion
dependence
in a polymer
of this
coefficient diffusion
can be determined
D in Fick’s second coefficient,
(Rogers,
1965;
an
law
apparent
Stannett,
1968;
(7)
in which:
D
= diffusion
DO
= preexponential
E,’
= activation
coefficient factor
energy
(cm’. sec.‘) (cm2. sec.‘)
for diffusion
in a polymer
(kJ . mol”)
in which the preexponential
factor
D, is related to the number of holes in which
the penetrant
can
619 be accommodated energy
(dependent
of diffusion)
depends
on polymer
and solute
on the ease with which
temperature-independent
D, thus includes
E,’ includes the enthalpic
factors.
Diffusion-determining (Rogers,
density
polymer
entropic
1)
and
crosslinking,
which
crosslinking:
because
diffusivity
the number
decreases
whereas
the temperature-dependent
are influenced
by temperature
include
chain
riaidity:
becomes
more
elastomeric
state,
polymer
to transfer
addition,
the
rendering
temperature-dependent
activation
energy
curve
(Rogers,
longer
been reported;
these
Diffusion
solutes.
(Karickhoff
As the
solutes
apparently
more
In
Table
polymers
4a,
of slow
temperature
from
1985;
the
polymer
diffusion
1993). and
density
because
chains.
it
In the
and thus higher diffusivities.
may
however,
diffusivity
rigid polymer
be affected
in nonlinear
can be determined
law constants
from water
to gas were calculated.
which
to the
from water
in synthetic
In
by temperature,
In D-l/T
curves.
The
by the slope of the In D-l/T
usually remain
polymers,
to 1013 cm’/sec, sediments
in the same order of
sediment
many different
lower
are lower 1986;
the lower values
to diffuse
activation
values
values
generally
still, ranging
Steinberg
have
being
from
10-‘-l
et al., 1987;
for 0.”
Rijnaarts
again being for the larger solutes.
experiments through
were
energies
of solutes.
are presented.
of Henry’s
of sorption
decreases
are of comparable
the
natural
organic
size,
it is
macromolecular
polymer.
for a number
desorption
contribution
more
This results
Wu and Gschwend,
for substances
a synthetic
lo”
in natural
sorption from the gas and not the aqueous
endothermic
between
be made
of E’,,
of solutes
range
in the
are presented
can
E’,-values.
and Reinhard,
difficult
mesh than through
in a decreasing
cause lower rigidities
“jumps”
coefficients
and Morris,
used
temperature
1965).
values
Grathwohl
Increasing
result
a molecule
The values
coefficients
larger
et al., 1990;
which
at a certain
For the diffusion
cm’/sec
by
at that temperature.
magnitude
chains
higher temperatures
ease
and
diffusion.
rigid
more difficult
density
of a “jump” from one hole to another
makes the jump more difficult.
2)
polymer
lower.
and consequentely
increases
increasing
of solute becomes
of holes makes the distance
and, as a result,
with
of holes for the accommodation
The lower number
enthalpy
E,’ (the activation
1965): densitv
energy
whereas
the solute can move from hole to hole. The factors,
characteristics
size),
and
In table
For table
4a.
sorption
4b,
it should
phase was involved.
reported
by Ashworth
enthalpies
to a polymer.
values
be mentioned
of
et al. (1988),
presented
kJ/mol.
in table
These range between
elastomeric
for the activation that
From the temperature
These were in the order of lo-40 sorption
enthalpies
reported
in all cases dependence
enthalpies
of transfer
Addition
of this large
4a gives
values
10 and 40 kJ/mol.
for the
620
Table 4a.
Diffusion
activation
energies
solutes in elastomeric
(E,
* in kJ/mol) and sorption enthalpies
(AH"in
kJ/mol)
for
polymers.
Polymer
Permeant
ED
AH"
Ref.1
santoprene
aliphatic alkanes
8-19
0.6-4
1
5 rubbers
1,2-dichlorobenzene
18-22
-1.4-2
2
chlorinated
5 rubbers
(mlethanes
n-alkanes
polyurethane methylated
polypropylene
C,,-C,,
fatty acids
15-44
-1.2-l
18-25
3-6
1
2 3
129-l 47
4
87-104
5
36
6
100-l 09
7
2-methylpropene
74.6
8
low-density-polyethylene
toluene
87.0
9
low-density-polyethylene
n-hexane
65.4
9
C,-C,, esters of 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyC4-
low-density-polypropylene
hydroxy-phenyll-propionic
acid
dimethyl-acetamide
urethane/urea/
ether copolymer polystyrene
dichloromethane
and
bromoethane polypropylene
various polymers
carbon dioxide
45i122
11
various polymers
methane
55*17’
11
natural rubber
methane
34-50
3-6
60
3.5
AVERAGE VALUE
’ References: 1991;
1 =Aminabhavi
4=Hayashi
and Phayde,
et al., 1994;
9 = Saleem. et al. 1989;
5=Mtiller
1995;
10 = Garrer and Skirrow,
’ average of 23 measurements
2 = Khinnavar
and Gevert.
(carbon dioxide);
1948;
1994:
and Aminabhavi. 6=Gou
1 1 = Stannett,
1992;
et al., 1994: 1968
average of 8 measurements
(methane)
3 = Khinnavar
7=Ryskin.
1955;
10
and Aminabhaw. FJ=Rogers,
1965;
621 Table 4b. Activation
compound
energies
(kJ/mol)
for slow sorption
E’ adsldes
temperature
(kJ.mol ‘1
range (OC)
1,2-dibromoethane
66*11
40-97
soil, loam
benzene
>o
5-45
soil, 0.16%
toluene
70
5-45
ethylbenzene
70
l,l,l-
>O
kinetics
type of adsorbent’
in soil/sediment.
adsorption or
ref.2
desorption
1.11%oc
desorption
1
om
adsorption
2
soil, 0.16%
om
adsorption
2
5-45
soil, 0.16%
om
adsorption
2
5-45
soil, 0.16%
om
adsorption
2
trichloroethane
’oc = % organic
carbon, om = % organic material
’ References: 1 = Steinberg et al.. 1967; 2 = Steinberg, 1992 3 Amounts of solute that ere ‘firmly bound’ i.e. slowly exchanging, increase with increasing temperature
Discussion
were
and conclusions
In the studies reviewed
in the present
paper,
a wide variety
used. This heterogeneity
is a common
problem
encountered
it renders the comparison data
in the
discussion
present
of the results of different
paper
are merely
deals with these general
For the thermodynamically enthalpy
changes
average
-0.25
electrostatic
interactions
accordance
with
Thompson,
1972). energies
(on the average
rates.
The fast character energies
only
enthalpies
trends.
reviews
sorption
equilibrium,
slightly
from solution to sediment are
equilibrium
involved.
sorption
The observation (Schwarzenbach
When
This
enthalpies
of an exothermic et al. 1993
temperature
implies a low “threshold” Following
are low
energy of 66 kJ/mol
and negative
should be slightly smaller than the desorption
activation
were found is in
and Hamaker
and
dependence
means
energies.
of fast sorption
adsorption
in low
energies
process.
for slow desorption.
that
0 and 50
resulting
the activation
to be higher than those for the fast sorption
activation
(on the
process
of the process
this argument,
negative
favourable
were both found to be between
leading to a positive
of the process
are expected
and
the thermodynamic general
the transfer
for fast ad- and desorption
with the observed
sorption
-8 kJ/mol).
in previous
18 kJ/mol),
Therefore, do reflect
science
interactions
are possible,
for fast ad- and desorption.
slow ad- and desorption
probably
sediment-water
hydrophobic
(on the average
kJ/mol
equilibrium
controlled
(e.g. H-bonding)
conclusions
The activation
in accordance
when
in soil and sediment
studies difficult. They
and sorbing materials
trends.
were usually found to accompany kJ/mol)
to be more exothermic
activation
indicative.
of solutes
This
for is
The fact that
activation
energies
622 Fast equilibrium temperature
dependence
this sorption increasing
enthalpy
process
is negative,
process
have positive
From all this,
a reason
times is nearly
dependence
of the
of slow
advanced
(the slowly
decreases) When
equilibrium
sorption.
whereas
sorbing
these two contributions
(which
average
3.5
60 kJ/mol.
kJ/mol,
i.e. slightly
polymer
stronger
Van der Waals
solute
and
the
interactions
the
endothermic Apart
enthalpy from
energies silicalite
of slow sorption dependence kJ/mol
lower
degree effect
through
for
membranes kinetics
(Kapteijn
organic
is smaller than the substances From the polymer Activation diffusion
data
diffusion energies
presented
for both
in soil and
with
short
temperature
equilibrium
“degree
of the is more
of nonequilibrium” phase) decreases.
sign, they cancel out and
have been observed for polymer
average
is a slightly exothermic
process
beneficial
and higher
slow
Thus,
present
paper
are positive
of relevance.
interactions than
show
between
intra-organic
the
matter
in sediments.
For
is not able to overcome
the
and
desorption
energies
positive
have
for polymer
(30-40
the observed
kJ/mol
also
been
diffusion, for
the
n-butane
temperature
dependence
of pore diffusion.
Temperature
of the lower E,‘:
This may also be caused
processes
probably
it is.
by the mechanism
diffusion
segments
heterogeneity thus
sorption
are
(on the
diffusion
pure polymer
may be lower because
processes
may also be a mechanism
sorption
Like the activation
polymers.
to the
sorption
dependence
slow
the
energies
for sediments
et al., 1994).
in the
slow
sorption
temperature
enthalpies
more
micropores
used in polymer
is comparable
be
of order
can also be explained
through
the
with the aqueous
of hole occupation
matter,
through
in case of pore diffusion
for diffusion
may
whereas
micropores.
diffusion
sorption
one is that
however,
in organic
it follows
of a negative
but with opposite
that sediment
enthalpy
diffusion
structures,
overall
with each other than with a solute;
of hole creation,
by diffusion
activation through
of the
that
because
Activation
is an endothermic
exothermic
with
diffusion-
and desorption
temperatures
is at equilibrium
endothermic).
matter,
phase
is probably
energy:
a combination
increases
equilibrium
interactions
organic
because
polymers,
explained
sorption
As
dependence.
One reason for the observation
whereas
polymer
sorption
and a positive
are equal in magnitude
positive
enthalpy.
to the water
activation
observation
at higher
fraction
result in hardly any or no net temperature materials,
through
of slow
for the
is that
solute
sorption
the
as well.
sorption
result
the fast fraction
For polymer
Rates
thermodynamics,
as this process
by a positive
of temperature:
of fast
The
will be shifted
of diffusion
can be found
independent
by the equilibrium
equilibrium
temperatures. energies
by equilibrium
this is different,
dependence
activation
equilibration
kinetics
sorption
is accompanied
is more rapid at higher
sediment
controlled
is thus governed
For slow sorption,
From the temperature
the diffusional
is probably
of this process
temperatures.
controlled. that
establishment
30-40
kJ/mol
vs 60
by the fact that n-butane
experiments. it can
involved
be concluded in slow
and of the
same
that
adsorption order
the
process
of
and desorption.
of magnitude.
Pore
623 Acknowledgements
Drs.
R. Bouma
polymers
and
science.
their constructive her linguistic
Dr. Th.
van den
We thank
prof.dr.
comments
during
Boomgaard
H.A.J.
are thanked
Govers,
manuscript
for introducing
Dr. P.C.M.
preparation.
van Noort,
We thank
us to the field of
and dr. S.M.
Drs.ing.
P.M.
Schrap for Knaapen
for
and permeation
of
advice.
References
Aminabhavi,
T.M.
aliphatic Ashworth,
and Phayde,
alkanes
R.A.,
R.C.
of organics Szecsody,
chlorinated
benzenes
Chemical
modeling
Society,
Washington
and
aquifer Barrer R.M., Biggar,
material.
Brusseau,
M.L.
sorption Brusseau,
C.T.,
and Slater,
nonionic Chiou,
C.T.
organic
(1981).
J. (1975). York.
L.J.
In:
(1988).
J. Hazard.
D.C.
Sci. 55: 17-37. Air-water
Mater.
Melchior
partitioning
1812536.
in porous
symposium
media.
and
R.L.
series 416,
Transport Bassett
American
of
feds.).
Chemical
and
Rao,
Sci. 27:177.
Cited in Rogers (1965)
by
249.
14-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic approach
V.H.
P.S.C.
to the adsorption
and
Nonequilibrium
Environ.
of sorbate
(1979).
matter
interactions
on
706.
(1991a).
processes.
Science
current
of sorbate-organic
18:1691-l
Sci. Technol.
coefficient
The mathematics
chemicals
25: 1237-l
soils: a thermodynamic
(1991 b). Influence
Environ.
of chemicals:
organic
Sci. Technol.
of picloram
The influence
of rate-limiting
compounds.
of halogenated
Proc. 37:863-868.
(1989).
and Freed,
Partition
J. Polym.
Adsorption
and Palouse Amer.
sorption Environ.
J. (1958).
Chemosphere
R.E.
compounds.
diffusion.
(1973).
Ephrata,
and Rao, P.S.C.
Assessment Crank,
M.W.
elucidation
Peters,
T.N.
processes
II. ACS
Long-term
2. lntraparticle
Jessup,
M.L.
solutions.
Microscale
diffusion
J. Appt. Polym.
Rogers,
aggregates.
(1991).
and Rao, P.S.C.
of organic
rubber.
and
systems
desorption,
DC, pp.526-538.
nonequilibrium.
chemicals: Brusseau,
(1990).
in porous
Soil Sci. Sot.
M.L.,
M.E.
in dilute aqueous J.E.
and Cheung,
mechanism.
Mullins,
P.V.
Barrie, J.A.
J.W.
Sorption,
thermoplastic
of aqueous
Roberts.
acid) on Panache,
Chiou,
G.B.,
and
Ball, W.P.
(1995).
into santoprene
Howe,
coefficients Bales,
H.T.S.
25:1501-l A physical
Sci. Technol.
structure
sorption
of
25: 134-l
42.
on nonequilibrium
organic
sorption
508. concept
of soil-water
equilibria
for
206:831-832. water
solubility
developments,
of diffusion.
Second
in environmental
Vol. 1 pp. 117-l edition.
chemistry.
Hazard
53.
Oxford
Science
Publishers,
New
624 Fujita,
H.
(1968).
In:
J.
Crank
and
G.S.
Park
(eds.).
Diffusion
in polymers,
ch.3,
Academic,
London. Garrer,
G.M.
and Skirrow,
GonzBlez-Pradas, Garcia,
A.
additions. Gou,
M.M.,
G. (1948).
Soil
(1992). Sci. Total
Koros,
W.J.
and
J.S.
agricultural Grathwohl,
P. and
Hamaker,
123/l
(1992).
Thompson,
Organic
chemicals
(1965)
of
M.
NHJI
and
and
Dimethylacetamide Polym.
Valverde-
organic
sorption
Sci. 51 :1685-l
of metribuzin
Desorption
marrer
kinetics
in a
699.
and metolachlor
of rrichloroethylene
Sci. Technol.
(1972).
in the
in Rogers Socias-Viciana,
in Alaskan
subarcric
60.
Environ.
J.M.
V.,
influence
(1994).
J. Appl.
Sorption
P. (1993).
and
diuron:
G.
Sci. 40:155-l
Reinhard,
Cited
24:551-560.
Goldman,
at the grain scale.
J.W.
(eds.).
J.S.
soil. Weed
limitations
of
block copolymer.
and Conn,
Sci. 3:549. PBrez-Cano,
M.,
adsorption
Environ.
urethane/urea/ether Graham,
J. Polym.
E., Villafranca-Sgnchez,
in aquifer
material:
rate
27:2360-2366.
Adsorption.
soil environment.
In:
C.A.I.
Vol.1.
Goring
Marcel
and
Dekker,
J.W. Inc.,
Hamaker New
York,
pp.49-143. Hassett,
J.P.
and
sediments.
In:
chemicals
B.L.
SSSA
Society
H., Sakai,
effects
and
Special
of Agronomy,
J. Appl.
A., of
(1989).
Sun,
Polym.
T. and
rhe organic
The
sorption
K. Brown
of
(eds.).
publication
no.
nonpolar
Reactions
22.
Soil
organics
and
Science
by
movement
Society
soils of
and
organic
of America
and
pp.31 -44.
H. and Matsuzawa,
polypropylene. He, Y., Yediler,
W.L.
Sawhney
in soils.
American Hayashi,
Banwart,
S. (1994).
Diffusion
of merhyl
esters of higher fatty acid in
Sci. 51:2165-2173.
Kettrup,
carbon
A. (1995). conrenrs
of
Adsorption
of fluoranthene
adsorbents
and
on soil and lava:
temperature.
Chemosphere
30:141-150. Hensema,
E.R., Mulder,
rigid polymer Jota,
M.T.
and
congener Kapteijn,
M.H.V.
membranes.
Hassett,
J.P.
by dissolved
F., Bakker,
dependent
J. Appl. (1991).
C.A.
Polym.
Zheng,
G. and
of n-butane
(1993).
On the mechanism
of gas transport
in
Sci. 49:2081-2090.
Effects
of environmental
humic substances.
W.J.W.,
diffusion
and Smolders,
Environ. Moulijn,
through
Toxicol. J. (1994).
variables Chem.
on binding
of a PCB
10:483-491.
Temperature-
a silicalite- 1 membrane.
and occupancy-
Microporous
materials
3:227-234. Karickhoff,
S.W.,
natural Karickhoff,
S.W.
sediment Khinnavar,
Brown,
sediments.
Morris,
suspensions.
R.S.
polymer
and
D.S. Water
Scott,
K.R. Environ.
and Aminabhavi,
membranes.
and
T.A.
(1979).
Sorption
of hydrophobic
pollurants
on
of
polluranrs
in
Res. 13:241-248
T.M.
(1985).
Sorption
Toxicol.
Chem.
(1991).
I. Polyurethane
dynamics
hydrophobic
4:469-479.
Diffusion
and sorption
versus n-alkanes.
J. Appl.
of organic Polym.
liquids
rhrough
Sci. 42:2321-2328.
625 Khinnavar,
R.S.
and
Aminabhavi,
organic liquids.
J. Appl.
Liu, L.C, Cibes-Viade, Weed Matzner,
Polym.
H. and Koo,
(1992).
Resistance
Sci. 45: 1107-I F.K.S.
of barrier
elastomers
to hazardous
125.
(1970).
Adsorption
of ametryme
and diuron
by soils.
Sci. 18:470-474.
R.,
and
Bales,
Chemosphere McCloskey,
W.B.
and Bayer,
and Biggar,
beta-BHC
R.C.
29: 1755-I
on three California Mills, A.C
T.M.
(1994).
Transport
acridine
in
saturated
porous
media.
adsorption
and desorption
773. D.E. (I 987).
Thermodynamics
soils. Soil Sci. Sot.
J.W.
of
(1969).
from aqueous
of fluridone
Am. J. 51:605-612.
Solubility-temperature
and hexane
solutions
effect
on the adsorption
by soil materials.
of gama-
Soil Sci. Sot.
Amer.
and Proc.
33:210-216. Moller,
K. and Gevert, in lo w-density J. Appt.
Moreale,
T. (1994).
Polym.
A. and Van Bladel,
B.G.
sediments.
Olney,
in sea water. J.J.
Special
Podoll,
R.T.,
C.E. and Felbeck,
H.H.M.,
Asfour,
through
low
molecules. Schwarzenbach, chemistry.
H.J.
calcareous
Dynamic
J.C.,
density
R.P.,
of America,
soil. Environ.
chemicals Inc.,
matter
In: B.L.
in soils. SSSA
American
of naphthalene
A.J.B.
Sci. Technol.
of the organic
Interscience
Fiz. 25:458.
polyethylene
studies
biomineralization
Society
of
sorption
on soil
(1990).
24:1349-l solid state.
Publishers,
Effect
of desorption
of a-hexachlorocyclo-hexane 354. Volume
New York,
2, D. Fox, M.M.
pp.509-630.
Cited in Rogers (1965).
De Kee, D. and Harrison,
Polym.
(LDPEI
films:
B. (1989). effect
Diffusion
of organic penetrants
of size and shape
of the penetrant
Sci. 37:617-625.
Gschwend,
John Wiley
to suspended
in soils and sediments.
of organic
and Zehnder,
on the aerobic
(Ed.),
Zh. Tekhn.
J. Appl.
and anthropogenically
18:2399-2412.
In: Physics and Chemistry
A.F.A.,
a
073.
compounds
Society
(1989).
A., Jumelet,
M.,
from spiked
pp’-DDTadsorption
and movement
Soil Scince
mass transfer
G. Ya. (1955).
Saleem,
22,
Bachmann,
Labes and A. Weissberger Ryskin,
aniline residues:
106.
38: 1061-I
Reactions
Chemosphere
C.E. (1965).
14: 1087-I
of organic
solution.
in a contaminated Rogers,
phenols
coefficient.
WI, USA pp.45-80.
K.C. and Parrish,
and intraparticle
hydrocarbons
Acta
dynamics
number
Inc. Madison,
Irwin,
of hindered
size on the diffusion
of herebicide-derived
Jr, G.T. (1974).
Cosmochim.
Sorption
Publication
from aqueous Rijnaarts,
of chlorinated
and K. Brown (eds.).
Agronomy,
of the diffusion
of molecular
Soil interactions
Chemosphere
Geochim.
(1989).
Sawhney
analysis
The effect
Soil Sci. 127: l-9.
Desorption
contaminated
Pignatello,
R. (I 979).
approach.
(1985).
Pierce Jr, R.H.,
(LDPE):
Sci. 51:895-903.
thermodynamic Oliver,
An FTIR solid-state
polyethylene
P.M.
& Sons, Inc.,
and
Imboden,
D.P.(1993).
New York pp.276-277.
Environmental
organic
626 Singh,
R.P.,
Kumari,
carbofuran Safety Stannett,
(1968).
Simple
gases.
Press, London,
S.M.,
Pignatello,
soils: entrapment S.M.
J.J.
J. (I 994).
J.W.
surfaces.
(1993).
University Tateya,
of Utrecht,
large
lakes.
Chelsea, Wauchope,
on the adsorption
on soils. Ecotoxicol.
Vol.
herbicides
USA,
Savage,
K.E.
Diffusion
of
Environ.
in polymers.
fate,
of ethanol,
toluene,
in a
and xylene
in
804.
on chlorinated
in the aqueous
pp. 147-I
environment.
208.
hydrocarbons
benzene
sorption
to
15 1.
of triorganotins
R. (1988).
in
315.
Sci. 51:1797-l
effects
22: 1141-I
21 :I 201-I
and halogenated
properties Polym.
of 1,2-dibromoethane
Sci. Technol.
24: 1301-I
Temperature
the Netherlands,
III. Sources,
Michigan,
R.D.,
feds.1
Persistence
Environ.
J. Appl.
(1991).
Chemosphere
ocean
Park
volatile aromatic
soil. Chemosphere
S. and Tatsukawa,
in the open
G.S.
B.L. (1987).
Sorption/desorption
Fate and effects
S., Tanabe, levels
R.C.
and
micropores.
of several
membranes.
and Bales,
hydrophobic Tas,
factors
yl carbamate)
Crank
and Sawhney,
Persistence
polyfdimethylsiloxane) J.E.
In: J.
carbon calcareous
and Chen,
Szecsody,
of different
pp.41-73.
in intraparticle
(I 992).
low organic Sun, Y.M.
Influence
29:70-79.
V.
Steinberg,
D. (1994).
(2,3-dih ydro-2,2’-dimethyl-7-N-meth
Academic Steinberg,
K. and Singh,
environment.
Ph.D.
Thesis,
77. PCBs on the globe:
In: N.W.
and controls
Schmidtke of toxic
possible
fed.).
Toxic
contaminants.
trend of future contamination
Lewis
Publ.,
in Inc.
pp.237-281. and
Koskinen,
in soil: naphthalene
W.C.
as a model
(1983).
compound
Adsorption-desorption
equilibria
for entropy-enthalpy
effects.
of
Weed
Sci. 31:744-751. Weber
Jr, W.J., hydrophobic studies.
Wu,
S.C.
Water
parameters Chemosphere
Pirbazari,
W.B.,
P.M.
M.,
by sediments,
Res. 17: 1443-I
sediments
B.S., McGill,
T.c.,
compounds
and Gschwend,
natural Xing,
Voice,
(1986).
M.J.,
for pentachlorophenol 26: 131 l-1 324.
G.E.
and
Ulanoff,
soils and suspended
D.M.
solids
(1983).
Sorption
of
- Il. Sorbent evaluation
452. Sorption
and soils. Environ. Dudas,
Hunt,
kinetics
Sci. Technol.
Hepler,
of hydrophobic
L.G. and Dobrogowska,
sorption
organic
compounds
20:717-725.
on montmorillonite
C. (I 993).
Thermodynamic
in aqueous
suspensions.
to