Postharvest Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173 – 179 www.elsevier.com/locate/postharvbio
Effect of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala on interactions between Penicillium roqueforti, Penicillium carneum, and Penicillium paneum in moist grain under restricted air supply Marianne E. Boysen, Stina Bjo¨rneholm 1, Johan Schnu¨rer * Department of Microbiology, Swedish Uni6ersity of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7025, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Received 29 July 1999; accepted 18 February 2000
Abstract Penicillium roqueforti was recently reclassified into the three species P. roqueforti, Penicillium carneum, and Penicillium paneum based on differences in ribosomal DNA sequences and secondary metabolites, e.g. mycotoxins. This is the first report on interaction between these closely related mould species under stress conditions. The yeast Pichia anomala (J121) inhibits growth of P. roqueforti in grain stored in malfunctioning airtight storage systems. The ability of P. anomala to inhibit all three species of the P. roqueforti group was examined in separate experiments as well as the competition between the three mould species when co-cultured with or without the yeast in non-sterile wheat grain (aw 0.95) under restricted air supply. Mould growth was analysed by dilution plating after 14 days and the individual colonies identified by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting. When co-culturing the P. roqueforti group in wheat without P. anomala all three species were able to grow to the same extent. Also, when co-culturing all species of the P. roqueforti group together with P. anomala, the growth response of the three species was very similar. At yeast levels of 104 CFU g − 1 grain a pronounced inhibition was observed and at 105 CFU g − 1 grain a fungicidal effect was detected, indicating a potentiated effect of P. anomala when co-culturing the three mould species. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Fungal interaction; biocontrol; mould; Penicillium roqueforti group; Pichia anomala; Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
1. Introduction
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-18-673215; fax: + 4618-673392. E-mail address:
[email protected] (J. Schnu¨rer) 1 Present address: Arla R&D, Torsgatan 14, S-105 46 Stockholm, Sweden.
In recent years, there has been an increased interest in biological control of both field and postharvest growth of fungi (Paster et al., 1993; Ho¨keberg et al., 1997; Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1998). In a temperate climate Penicillium species are the most important fungi in stored grain and,
0925-5214/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 9 2 5 - 5 2 1 4 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 8 6 - 7
174
M.E. Boysen et al. / Posthar6est Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173–179
especially under airtight conditions, Penicillium roqueforti will be the dominating species (Lacey and Magan, 1991). Based on secondary metabolite profiles, and genetic and morphological studies (Boysen et al., 1996), P. roqueforti was recently divided into the three species P. roqueforti, Penicillium carneum, and Penicillium paneum (hereafter collectively referred to as the P. roqueforti group). P. roqueforti is able to grow at low oxygen/high carbon dioxide concentrations (Pitt and Hocking, 1997) and as recently shown by Petersson and Schnu¨rer (1998) all three species are able to grow to the same extent on grain with restricted air supply. Since the three species all grow well on media containing up to 0.5% acetic acid (Boysen et al., 1996) they could be expected to compete in similar environments. Little is known about the outcome of interactions between closely related moulds when exposed to stress caused by physical factors (e.g. low oxygen, low water availability, pH) or biocontrol agents. However, studies on field and postharvest moulds of grain have shown that inter- and intra-genera competition varies depending on carbon and nitrogen source, temperature, and water activity (aw). Generally, in vitro and in vivo interactions between different genera show dominance of Fusarium species, especially at higher aw (0.99–0.96), while e.g. Penicillium species dominate at lower aw (0.95 – 0.93) (Magan and Lacey, 1985; Marı´n et al., 1997, 1998a; Reddy et al., 1998). Magan and Lacey (1985) saw that intra-genus interactions of Penicillium species on wheat grain were highly dependent on temperature and aw. We have previously shown that the yeast Pichia anomala J121 is an effective biocontrol organism of P. roqueforti in airtight stored grain (Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1995, 1998). In the present study we examined the effect of P. anomala on P. roqueforti, P. carneum, and P. paneum inoculated in dual cultures in wheat grain. Furthermore, we carried out a preliminary test of the competition between the three species in mixed cultures under limited air supply, by co-inoculation of all three mould species in moist grain with or without yeast amendment. Mould growth was quantified by dilution plating of homogenised grain samples.
DNA was extracted from individual colonies to allow identification from the dilution plates by combining the PCR-based molecular technique random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting and macro-morphological characterisation.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Fungal isolates and cereal grain P. anomala J121 originating from wheat grain is kept in the fungal collection at the Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Sweden. P. roqueforti IBT18 689 and IBT6754 (type strain) originating from rye bread and blue cheese, respectively; P. carneum IBT14 042 and IBT6884 (type strain) both originating from rye bread; and P. paneum IBT13 929 and IBT12 407 (type strain) originating from bakers’ yeast and rye bread, respectively, were all gifts from J.C. Frisvad, Department of Biotechnology (IBT), Technical University of Denmark. Isolates chosen are well-defined culture collection isolates including the type-strains of all three mould species. Winter wheat (cv. Kosack) of seed quality (without any seed dressing), harvested 1996, was purchased from the Lantma¨nnen Cooperatives, Uppsala, Sweden.
2.2. Inocula Yeast and mould spore suspensions were prepared from yeast malt sucrose broth and on malt extract agar (MEA), respectively (Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1998).
2.3. Inhibition of P. roqueforti IBT18 689, P. carneum IBT14 042, or P. paneum IBT13 929 in moist wheat by the yeast P. anomala J121 Moistened grain (aw 0.95) was inoculated as previously described (Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1998) in separate experiments with mould spore suspensions of P. roqueforti, P. carneum, and P. paneum respectively to about 3×103 spores g − 1
M.E. Boysen et al. / Posthar6est Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173–179
grain. The yeast P. anomala was similarly inoculated to achieve 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, or 106 cells g − 1 grain. The grain was incubated in ‘mini-silos’ (rubber-sealed tubes containing 17-g portions) with simulated air leakage at 25°C in the dark (Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1998). This water activity and temperature favour growth of P. roqueforti (Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1995). On days 0 and 14, three tubes from each treatment were opened, and the contents were diluted with peptone water (2 g l − 1 phytone peptone, BBL, USA) with 0.015% Tween 80. Yeast growth was quantified on MEAC plates (MEA supplemented with 100 ppm chloramphenicol, Sigma Chemical Co., USA) and to avoid growth inhibition by antagonistic yeast on agar plates intended for mould CFU counting, MEACC (MEAC supplemented with 10 ppm cycloheximide, Sigma Chemical Co., USA) was used (Bjo¨rnberg and Schnu¨rer, 1993).
2.4. Competition between P. roqueforti, P. carneum, and P. paneum when co-inoculated in moist wheat and inhibition of the mixed culture by P. anomala Competition between related mould species on natural substrate was tested by co-inoculating the P. roqueforti group in grain. Grain was moistened (aw 0.95) and inoculated as previously described (Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1998). Two combinations of isolates were tested: (A) the three type strains (IBT6754, IBT6884, and IBT12 407), or (B) three non-type strains (IBT18 689, IBT14 042, and IBT13 929). Inoculation with spore suspensions was made to about 103 spores of each species g − 1 grain. The procedure for inoculation, incubation, and analysis of mould growth was as described above. The effect of P. anomala on the combined P. roqueforti group was tested with mould combinations as described above (A and B). Moulds were inoculated to about 103 spores of each species g − 1 grain. P. anomala was inoculated to achieve 103, 104, or 105 cells g − 1 grain. Mould growth was analysed as described above. The number of mould colony forming units (CFU) g − 1 grain was recorded for each of the
175
species in the mixture after identifying the individual colonies as described below.
2.5. Identification of co-inoculated strains of P. roqueforti, P. carneum, and P. paneum by random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting Colonies picked at random (up to 100 per experiment) were identified by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). The colony top of agar plugs of 5 mm diameter were excised from each colony and DNA extracted using either of two methods: (1) Heating fungal spores and mycelium in NaOH/SDS for 30 min at 105°C as described by Olsson et al. (1999). Samples were diluted about 100 times in sterile H2O and DNA stored at − 20°C. (2) Agar plugs were subjected to DNA extraction using the Fast DNA Prep Kit H (BIO 101, USA). DNA was diluted five times and stored at −20°C. The second method was mostly used as it was faster and gave more consistent results. Fingerprinting by RAPD was essentially carried out as described by Boysen et al. (1996) using the universal primers NS2 and NS7, which are specific to the small nuclear ribosomal gene (18S rDNA) (White et al., 1990). Reaction mixtures of 15 ml contained 2 ml of the diluted DNA extractions, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each of the dNTPs, 0.25% Tween 20, 10% (v/v) DMSO, 0.5 mM of either primer, and 0.6 U AmpliTaq–DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer Cetus, USA) and amplification conditions as previously described (Boysen et al., 1996).
2.6. Macro-morphological identification of co-inoculated strains of P. roqueforti, P. carneum, and P. paneum All colonies of relevant dilutions were identified based on macro-morphological characterisation supported by the RAPD fingerprinting of representative colonies. On MEAC the various isolates were distinguished by the following characteristics: P. roqueforti (IBT6754 and IBT18 689): dull (blue-)green colour, colony margin slightly arachnoid, no exudate production, P. carneum
176
M.E. Boysen et al. / Posthar6est Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173–179
(IBT6884 and IBT14 042): dark blue-green colour with floccose centre, colony margin arachnoid, no exudate production, P. paneum (IBT12 407 and
IBT13 929): green colour, exudate in colony, colony margin entire. Similar characteristics were observed on MEACC, except that all strains had a smaller colony diameter and that the colonies of P. roqueforti were slightly umbonate with an entire colony margin, P. carneum had only a slightly arachnoid colony margin, and ageing colonies of P. paneum had a white colony margin.
2.7. Statistical analysis
Fig. 1. RAPD fingerprinting for identification of single mould colonies. Results of RAPD analysis using either NS2 or NS7 as primer on representative colonies picked from dilution plates. (a) type strains or (b) non-type strains of P. roqueforti (P.r.), P. carneum (P.c.), and P. paneum (P.p.). M: Molecular weight marker (1 kb ladder, GIBCO BRL, USA).
Fig. 2. Effect of P. anomala as a biocontrol agent on the P. roqueforti group. Results show effects of increasing initial levels of P. anomala on growth of species of the P. roqueforti group when cultured separately in moist wheat stored under restricted air supply for 14 days. P. roqueforti IBT18 689 ( ), P. carneum IBT14 042 () and P. paneum IBT13 929 ( ). The dotted line represents the mean value of initially inoculated levels of moulds (n =3). Data are means 9 S.D. (n= 3).
All data were log-transformed prior to analysis with the GLM procedure of the SAS statistics software (SAS Institute Inc., USA). Subsequently, significant differences were calculated based on the least significant differences (LSD). Three replicates were used for each treatment and all experiments were repeated twice.
3. Results and discussion From each of the sets of moulds (A and B) RAPD fingerprinting was carried out on selected colonies to confirm and support the macro-morphological identification (Fig. 1). In all cases the identity was confirmed using both NS2 and NS7 as primers. In general, the profiles resembled those previously published for the three species (Boysen et al., 1996), giving e.g. a 0.9 kb band using NS2 and a 2.3 kb band using NS7 for P. roqueforti, and a strong 0.5 kb band using NS2 for P. paneum. Subsequently, all colonies on relevant plates were identified based on macromorphology. With limited air supply, growth of all three species of the P. roqueforti group in grain was inhibited by P. anomala in a dose-dependent manner. When cultured without the addition of P. anomala, mould levels rose from 5× 103 CFU g − 1 wheat at day 0 to 5 × 106 CFU g − 1 wheat after 14 days (Fig. 2). Increasing the initial inoculum level of yeast to 104 cells g − 1 wheat had a markedly inhibitory effect on all three species and at yeast levels of 106 CFU g − 1 inhibition was almost total (Fig. 2). The mould–yeast dual-culture tests carried out in this study thus gave similar results with all three species as previously
M.E. Boysen et al. / Posthar6est Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173–179
Fig. 3. Interaction of the P. roqueforti group when exposed to biocontrol. Effects of increasing initial levels of P. anomala on growth of mixed cultures of the P. roqueforti group in moist wheat stored under restricted air supply for 14 days. P. roqueforti ( ), P. carneum () and P. paneum ( ). (a) Growth of the type strains (IBT6754, IBT6884, and IBT12 407) in combination. LSD is 0.38 at P= 0.05. (b) Growth of the non-type strains (IBT18 689, IBT14 042, and IBT13 929) in combination. LSD is 0.28 at P = 0.05. Dotted lines represent mean values of initial inoculated levels of moulds (n = 9). Means (n= 3) with the same letter for any one set of points are not significantly different (P =0.05) according to the GLM procedure.
177
shown for P. roqueforti only (Fig. 1a and Fig. 2 in Petersson and Schnu¨rer, 1998). All three species of the P. roqueforti group grew to the same extent in mixed cultures without yeast addition. After inoculating about 103 CFU g − 1 grain at day 0, all species increased to 105 –106 CFU g − 1 grain after 14 days (Fig. 3a and b; 0-level of P. anomala). No significant change was seen in the relative levels of the three species between day 0 and 14. When adding antagonistic yeast to mixed cultures of the P. roqueforti group, the three species showed very similar responses (Fig. 3a and b). At initial yeast levels of 104 CFU g − 1 grain, a marked degree of inhibition was observed and at 105 yeast cells g − 1 grain, mould levels decreased below inoculation levels after 14 days (Fig. 3a and b), suggesting a potentiating fungicidal effect of the interaction between the moulds. None of the Penicillium species seemed to dominate, although small variations were seen depending on which isolates were used. Also, Petersson and Schnu¨rer (1998) found that three of these isolates, and an additional three isolates, do not differ in their colonisation of grain from a number of barley, rye, and wheat cultivars. To our knowledge, no previous studies have been carried out on the effect on growth/colonisation of interacting closely related fungal species when exposed to a biocontrol agent. However, the observed potentiated effect seen in this study suggests that in vivo use of biocontrol agents would be favoured by the natural complexity of the microflora in grain. Magan and Lacey (1985) evaluated interactions between the Penicillium species, P. bre6icompactum, P. 6errucosum, P. hordei, P. piceum, and P. roqueforti on wheat grain at aw between 0.90 and 0.99 and at 15, 25 and 30°C during a 4-week period. At lower aw (0.90–0.92) and temperature (15°C) all species except P. piceum colonised well, and P. roqueforti, in particular, increased from 103 CFU g − 1 to about 107 CFU g − 1 compared to the others that increased from about 105 to 107 CFU g − 1. On the other hand, at higher aw (0.95– 0.96) and temperature (30°C) P. hordei and P. piceum clearly dominated and the other species were barely detectable by dilution plating, although they were found by direct plating. The
178
M.E. Boysen et al. / Posthar6est Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173–179
differences observed by Magan and Lacey (1985) suggest that in a case like the one described here with three closely related species, competition also could differ depending on environmental factors, allowing one or two of the species to dominate. However, more isolates should be tested in order to evaluate the effects of co-culturing closely related species and especially their growth response to higher doses of biocontrol agents in general. To our knowledge this is the first report where the molecular technique RAPD has been used for species identification with mixed cultures of fungi. Though tedious, RAPD fingerprinting provides a faster and more reliable way to distinguish colonies from the dilution plates than traditional identification (RAPD results obtainable within 24 h from dilution plates compared to 5 – 7 days culturing on special substrates). This is especially true in cases such as the present study, where fungal morphological characteristics are very similar and often require complementary tests for exact identification. In a controlled laboratory system, one can learn to distinguish the different species morphologically, but once new/natural strains are entered this might not be the case. Here the RAPD-supported identification provides a reliable alternative to the traditional methods. Though previous results have shown that the inhibition of Penicillium 6errucosum by P. anomala (J121) also reduces the production of ochratoxin A (Petersson et al., 1998), Marı´n et al. (1998b) found that fuminosin production from Fusarium species was maintained despite growth inhibition by competing fungi. It is therefore important in future studies on the interaction of the P. roqueforti group to analyse the effect on their toxin production during biocontrol.
Acknowledgements We wish to thank Dirk Jan van der Gaag for helping with the statistical analysis and Jan Stenlid for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA) and the Swedish Farmers’ Foundation for Agricultural Research (SLF).
References Bjo¨rnberg, A., Schnu¨rer, J., 1993. Inhibition of the growth of grain storage molds in vitro by the yeast Pichia anomala (Hansen) Kurtzman. Can. J. Microbiol. 39, 623 – 628. Boysen, M., Skouboe, P., Frisvad, J., Rossen, L., 1996. Reclassification of the Penicillium roqueforti group into three species on the basis of molecular genetic and biochemical profiles. Microbiology 142, 541 – 549. Ho¨keberg, M., Gerhardson, B., Johnsson, L., 1997. Biological control of cereal seed borne diseases by seed bacterization with greenhouse selected bacteria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103, 25 – 33. Lacey, J., Magan, N., 1991. Fungi in cereal grains: their occurrence and water and temperature relationships. In: Chelkowski, J. (Ed.), Cereal Grain. Mycotoxins, Fungi and Quality in Drying and Storage. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 77 – 118. Magan, N., Lacey, J., 1985. Interactions between field, and storage fungi on the wheat grain. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 85, 29 – 37. Marı´n, S., Rull, F., Ramos, A.J., Torres, M., Sala, N., Sanchis, V., 1997. Interactions on growth between Fusarium moniliforme, F. proliferatum, and Penicillium implicatum on maize grain depending on water activity and temperature levels. Cereal Res. Commun. 25, 497 – 498. Marı´n, S., Sanchis, V., Ramos, A.J., Vinas, I., Magan, N., 1998a. Environmental factors, in vitro interactions, and niche overlap between Fusarium moniliforme, F. proliferatum, and F. graminearum, Aspergillus and Penicillium species from maize grain. Mycol. Res. 102, 831 – 837. Marı´n, S., Sanchis, V., Rull, F., Ramos, A.J., Magan, N., 1998b. Colonization of maize grain by Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium proliferatum in the presence of competing fungi and their impact on fumonisin production. J. Food Protect. 61, 1489 – 1496. Olsson, J., Schnu¨rer, J., Pedersen, L.H., Rossen, L., 1999. A rapid and efficient method for DNA extraction from fungal spores and mycelium for PCR-based detection. J. Food Mycol. 2, 251 – 260. Paster, N., Droby, N., Chalutz, E., Menasherov, M., Nitzan, R., Wilson, C.L., 1993. Evaluation of the potential of the yeast Pichia guilliermondii as a biocontrol agent against Aspergillus fla6us and fungi of stored soya beans. Mycol. Res. 97, 1201 – 1206. Petersson, S., Schnu¨rer, J., 1995. Biocontrol of mold growth in high-moisture wheat stored under airtight conditions by Pichia anomala, Pichia guilliermondii, and Saccharomyces cere6isiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1027 – 1032. Petersson, S., Schnu¨rer, J., 1998. Pichia anomala as a biocontrol agent of Penicillium roqueforti in high-moisture wheat, rye, barley, and oats stored under airtight conditions. Can. J. Microbiol. 44, 471 – 476. Petersson, S., Hansen, M.W., Axberg, K., Hult, K., Schnu¨rer, J., 1998. Ochratoxin A accumulation in cultures of Penicillium 6errucosum with the antagonistic yeast Pichia anomala and Saccharomyces cere6isiae. Mycol. Res. 102, 1003 – 1008.
M.E. Boysen et al. / Posthar6est Biology and Technology 19 (2000) 173–179 Pitt, J.I., Hocking, A.D., 1997. Fungi and Food Spoilage. Chapman and Hall, New York. Reddy, V.K., Kumari, D.R., Reddy, S.M., 1998. Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on the interaction of mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxin production. J. Food Sci. Technol. 35, 268 – 270.
.
179
White, T.J., Bruns, T.D., Lee, S., Taylor, J., 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J. (Eds.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 315 – 322.