Vol. 82, No. 4, 1978
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 1057-1061
June 29, 1978
EFFECT OF TIN COMPOUNDSON ACTIVITY OF 5-AMINOLEVULINATE Momoko Chiba
April
and Masakazu
Kikuchi
Department of Hygiene, University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113, Japan
Juntendo Received
DEHYDRATASE IN BLOOD
17, 1978
SUMMARY Erythrocyte 5-aminolevulinate dehydratase activity was measured in rabbits administered with tin(I1) or tin(IV). A significant decrease in enzymic activity was observed in the case of tin(II), while any significant effect was not detected in the case of tin(W). It (ALAD,
is well
known that
EC 4.2.1.24),
biosynthetic
On the other those
which
pathway,
has a protective
effect hand,
on other
and small
metals
inhibits
this
From further to be restricted
is
is
the
inhibited against
by lead this
probably of tin.
experiment, only
on tin
We have studied
blood inhibitory
to bivalent
2),
is
and zinc
(3,
4, 5).
fewer
than
rapid
excretion
the effect
and we found
in rabbit this
(1,
inhibition
due to the
on ALAD activity, activity
dehydratase
second enzyme in porphyrin
number of reports
metals,
toxicity
several
5-aminolevulinate
that
tin
significantly effect
of
(6). was found
tin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult male white rabbits, weighing Animals and tin solutions. Tin compounds used were stannous 2.5~ 3.5 kg. were used. stannic chloride (SnC14), and stannous chloride (SnC12*2H20), citrate [Sn(OH)Sn(C6H507)]. A solution of 5 pmol of each compound dissolved in 0.5 ml of 5% glucose was injected per The animal kg of body weight via the marginal ear vein. number of rabbits, kinds of tin solutions, and pH groups, There are value of the solutions are listed in Table I. various tin derivatives but the kinds of compounds suitable for our experiment are limited by its insolubility and tin is readily oxidized by unstability. Since the bivalent air to tetravalent, the solutions for Groups C and D were 0006-291X/78/0824-1057$01.00/0 1057
Copyright All rights
0 1978
by Academic Press, Inc. in any form reserved.
of reproduction
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 82, No. 4, 1978
Table
I.
Rabbit
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
and treatment
Group
n
A B
7
-
3
-
5% glucose 5% glucose
C D E
4
II
SnC12*2H20
4 2
IV II
F
3
IV"
SnC14 Sn(OH)Sn(C6H507) SnC12* 2H20*
* This after
Valence
group
AND BIOPHYSICAL
Administered
pH of
solution
solution
5.89 1.95 (with dil.
HCl)
3.23 1.95 3.30 3.20
solution was kept at room temperature for 50 days preparation, and Sn2+ could not be detected.
prepared immediately before injection. The solution for Group F was the same solution used for Group C after leaving at room temperature for 50 days, as tin(W). Absence of for Groups D and F was confirmed by Sn2+ in the solutions colorimetoric method using toluene-3,4-dithiol (7). Animals in Groups A,B,C, and D were injected onceaday for three consecutive days. Those in Groups E and F were injected once. Blood was collected from the Measurement of ALAD activity. marginal ear vein into heparinized small tubes and immediately kept on solid carbon dioxide to hemolyze erythrocytes. This hemolyzed sample was used as the sorce of enzyme. The assay method of the enzymic activity was the same as that described in our previous paper (8). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In Groups A, B, C, and D, ALAD activity 3, 4, 7, 10, 15, results
are
and 24 daysafterthe
shown in Fig.
of tin(I1)
on blood
of tin(IV);
tin(I1)
after
only
is nearly
a single the
showed no effect
first
It
injection,andthe
is clear
ALAD activity
is
significantly
decreases
injection.
same effect
is known to inhibit
1.
was measured 1, 2,
This
far
on the activity.
from that
of (9),
of
lead/kg, but
TO examine whether
1058
effect
the activity
drop by tin
markedly
the
different
of 1 mg (5 pmol)
ALAD activity
that
5 pmol/kg which tin(IV) the
Vol. 82, No. 4,1978
8lOCHEMlCAL
I2
34
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
7
IO
15
24 ( Days)
7tt
Figure
observed
ALAD activity in blood from rabbits injected -iv with 5 umol of tin per kg (0) Group A (control), (m) Group B (control (A) Group C [tin(II)], (v) Group D [tin(IV) 1‘ Injection 1 &SD
1.
difference
between
phenomenon associated general tin,
with
characteristic
following
experiment
and those
with
by atomic
result
shown in Table
the ALAD activity We attempted
Group D or F, but Effect
of
was estimated
lead
II.
It
with
in rabbit
toxicity
the
storage
was This
that
this
on the result
1059
standing
tin(I1)
does
but
tin
not
50 pmol of tin(IV)/kg
prevented
absorption
of
Group F,
erythrocytes of
of
as tin
50-day for
was proved
contamination
by atomic
solution
spectrophotometry.
to administer its
The rabbits
In the solution
absorption
a
in the valence
citrate
during
is
I,
compounds or a
out.
stannous
concentration
confirmed
(IV).
tin
was carried
as tin(N).
no change in tin
inhibit
specific
of Group F were injected
SnC12 solution,
is
the
and tin(IV)
due to difference
Group E were injected (II),
tin(I1)
.I I
experiment. of
spectrophotometry
tin(I1) applied
to
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 82, No. 4, 1978
Table
ALAD activity
II.
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
in Groups E and F
ALAD activity* Group
Before
E (Sn2+)
F (Sn4+)
injection
solution
the
was not
former
0.16
1.18
1.16
1.10 1.14
1.06
0.04
1.11
detectable
of lead
by injection
with
excreted
This
organism. that
tin
is not
and systemic reported
and the
being
converted
assumption rapidly
is
the
supported
of
blood
form
by Hiles'
in rats
in the
statment
during
Furtheremore,
tin(I1)
triggered
may be
toxic
or reduced
(10).
absorption
the
that
possible
Tin(W)
into
oxidized
was confirmed
latter,
was negligible.
transportation
that
It
from the bone into
tin,
without
erythrocytes/h 5 pmol tin/kg
of
and sample blood.
mobilization
injection**
1.23 1.19
* unit: pmol porphobilinogen/ml ** At 24 h after -iv injection
to the tin
After
absorption Hiles
(10)
was faster
than
tin(W). Although activity lead
it
and it exposure,
conjecture. the difference
is well
known that
is one of its
Tin(I1)
the useful
inhibitory also
lead
decreases
indices
to evaluate
mechanism still decreases
in mode of action
remains
ALAD activity,
between
ALAD
lead
a
and
and tin
must
be elucidated. REFERENCES 1. Lichtman, H. C., 42, 830-839.
and Feldman,
F.
1060
(1963)
J.
Clin.
Invest.
Vol. 82, No. 4, 1978
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
2. de Bruin, A. (1968) Med. Lab. 59, 411-418. V. N., Murthy, L., Pezano, W. B., and Petering, 3. Finelli, H. G. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 60, 1418-1424. 4. Finelli, V. N., Klauder, D. S., Karaffa, M. A,, and Petering, H. G. (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 65, 303-311. 5. Thomasino, J. A., Zuroweste, E., Brooks, S. M., Petering, H. G., Lerner, S. I., and Finelli, V. N. (1977) Arch. Environ. Health 32, 244-266. 6. Chiba, M., and Kikuchi, M. (1974) Sangyo Igaku 16, 226-227. 7. Ishidate, M. (1966) Quantitative Microanalysis (in Japanese), PP- 195-198, Nanzando, Tokyo. 8. Chiba, M., Tashiro, A., Nishima, T., and Kikuchi, M. (1976) Ind. Health 14, 67-74. 9. Chiba, M., and Kikuchi, M. (1974) Sangyo Igaku 16, 531-545. 10. Hiles, R. A. (1974) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 27, 366-379.
1061