027&5646/91 0
$0.00 + 30
199l~rg~on~e~plc
EFFECTS OF ADJUNCTIVE VERAF~ IN CHRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIC
ADMINISTRATION PATIENTS
GYORGY BARTKO$, SZABOLCS HORVATH, GYORGY ZADOR and EDE FRECSKA* National Institute for Nervous and Mental Diseases, Budapest, Hungary
(Final form, October 1990)
Abstract Bartko, Gyorgy, Szabolcs Horvath, Gyorgy Zador and Ede Frecska: Effects of adjunctive verapamil administration in chronic schizophrenic patients. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. & Biol. Psychiat. 1991, =:343-349. 1. 2.
3.
The efficacy of adjunctive verapamil on psychopathological symptoms and tardive dyskinesia was investigated in 22 chronic schizophrenic patients, who had partially responded to neuroleptics. After 28 days verapamil administration (240 mg/day) a significant improvement was found in anxiety-depression, and in some positive and Three of the 22 patients showed clinically negative symptoms. pronounced global improvement. The treatment was ineffective in tardive dyskinesia.
Kevwords: psychopathology,
schizophrenia, tardive dyskinesia, verapamil.
Scale Involuntary Movements (AIMS), Abbreviations: Abnormal Diphenylbutylpiperidine (DPBP), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (sANs), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS),
Introduction Verapamil a calcium channel
antagonist widely used in the treatment of
cardiovascular diseases has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects in mania and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Recently, Gould et al. (1983) have suggested that the ability of pimozide and other drugs of the diphenylbutylpiperidine group (DPBP) to relieve negative symptoms of schizophrenia
is related to their potency in calcium
channel antagonism while the classical neuroleptics are lacking this effect. Verapamil is structurally
similar to DPBP neuroleptics and blocks calcium
channels similarly. Present address:
Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA
343
344
G. Bartko et ai.
Bloom et
al.
(1987) reported
the
therapeutic
efficiency
verapamil in the treatment of a refractory schizophrenic.
of
adjunctive
Giannini et al.
(1985) found verapamil alone to be as effective in acute schizophrenia as haloperidol.
In Prices' study
(1987) both haloperidol and verapamil were
superior to placebo in decreasing psychotic symptoms of acute schizophrenics. Tourjman et al.
(1987) demonstrated
added to neuroleptic Pickar
et
al.
some therapeutic effects of verapamil
therapy of chronic
(1987)
treated
schizophrenic patients.
chronic
schizophrenic
However,
patients
recently
withdrawn from neuroleptics with verapamil and found increases in paranoia during the treatment period.
Two other studies (Grebb et al. 1986, Uhr et
al. 1988) demonstrated the inefficacy of verapamil in chronic schizophrenia. However, all studies employed small sample sizes and verapamil doses may have been to low to exert a therapeutic effect. Verapamil may also have some role in explaining tardive
dyskinesia
supersensitivity.
through
prevention
of
and perhaps preventing
neuroleptic
induced
dopamine
In a case report [Barows and Childs, 1986) and Reiter et
al's study 11989) it was found to improve tardive dyskinesia of schizophrenic patients treated with verapamil. The goal of the present study was to ecafuate the therapeutic effect of adjunctive dyskinesia
verapamil of
on
chronic
the positive schizophrenic
and
negative
patients
symptoms
partially
and
tardive
responding
to
neuroleptics. Methods Patient population The 22 (18 male, 4 female) patients participating in the study were selected among the chronic schizophrenics, hospitalized for at least 6 months at the
long-term
Diseases.
ward of
the National
Institute
for Xervous
and Mental
They all gave informed consent for participation in the study.
The diagnoses
were made on the basis of the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) of Spitzer et al. (1978). Six of the patients were paranoid , 3 were The mean + SD catatonic, 9 were disorganized and 4 were undifferentiated. f number Cl mean +SD 57.6 years, the 36.5 was the patients age of
hospitalizations was 9.0 L 6.5, and the mean + SD duration of their illness All were free of somatic, neurologic, or secondary was 13.4 + 8.2 years. The patients responded partially to neurc.lleptic psychiatric disorders. treatment and continued to Fhow mild to marked positive symptoms during their All patients required to have moderate to severe negative hospitalization. symptoms.
Effects ofverapamilinchronlc schfiophrenla
Study
The
345
Desiqn patients
were
receiving
neuroleptics
(haloperidol,
thioridazine,
flupentixol), which were held at a constant dose for at least 3 weeks before and throughout the trial.
The mean + SD dose of neuroleptics was 611 5 2.95
mg/day in chlorpromazine equivalents (Davis, 1969).
After an initial symptom
rating, verapamil was administered at 80 mg three times a day
(240 mg/day
total) orally for 28 days. Assessment Instruments The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Overall and Gorham, 19621, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms
(SAPS) (Andreasen, 1981) and
the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) (Andreasen, 1981) were used to rate psychopathological
symptoms.
dyskinesia was assessed on the Abnormal
The
severity of
tardive
Involuntary Movement Scale
(AIMS)
Both ratings were made by the same clinical psychiatrist at (Guy, 1976). baseline and on day 28. The BPRS scores were analyzed as total score and by each of the five factors, and the SANS and SAPS scores were analyzed as summary score (sum of the global ratings) and by each of the subscale scores (global rating). Data analysis Statistical analysis were performed by Wilcoxon test (one-tailed), Results Twenty eight days after the verapamil administration the pretreatment BPRS total score, the scores of the anxiety/depression factors decreased significantly, avolition/apathy.
and thought disturbance
The delusion subscale score of SAPS, the
anhedonia/asociality
subscale
scores
of
SANS
and
summary score improved significantly after treatment with verapamil
SANS (Table
1). In three of the 22 patients, who had exhibited prominent both positive and negative symptomatology during the last 6 months before trial a clinically relevant global improvement was observed after the verapamil administration.
346
G. Bartko
et al.
Table 1 Psychopathological Ratings in 22 Chronic Schizophrenic Patients at Baseline and on Day 28 of Verapamil Administration
At baseline
On day 28
Significance* (P)
Brief Psychiatric Ratinq Scale Anxiety/depression
6.4+_3.0
5.2~2.3
Anergia
6.822.9
6.3~2.8
NS
Thought disturbance
9.655-O
7.5~4.2
co.01
Activation
5.022.4
5.1+2.4
NS
Hostility/suspiciousness
5.452.5
5.152.9
NS
33.228.8
29.229.0
Hallucinations
1.451.8
1.2~1.6
NS
Delusions
1.9+1.5
1.451.5
co.05
1.821.3
1.751.4
NS
Bizarre behavior
0.6+1.4
O-7+1.6
NS
Total score
5.7L2.9
5.0-3.0
NS
Affective flattening
2.550.8
2.151.0
NS
Alogia
1.9t1.5
l-7+1.7
NS
Avolition/apathy
2.4~0.8
1.5,l.l
Anhedonia/asociality
2.6~1.2
l-6+1.1
Attentional impairment
2.4~1.8
2.0~1.7
NS
11.823.7
8.953.5
co.01
Total score
co.01
Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms
Positive formal thought disorder
Scale for the Assessment of Neqative Symptoms
Total score
' Wilcoxon test Total
AIMS
scores
show$d
a nonsignificant
verapamil treatment (Table 2).
decrease
on
day
28 of
the
Effects ofverapamll inchronic schizophrenia
347
Table 2 Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale Ratings in 22 Chronic Schizophrenic Patients at Baseline and on Day 28 of Verapamil Administration
At baseline
Significancei
On day 28
(P)
AIMS total score
2.822.9
NS
2.152.5
* Wilcoxon test (one tailed) No major side effects emerged during the study. Discussion Our open study demonstrated
a beneficial adjuvant effect of verapamil on
anxiety/depression, and on some positive and negative symptoms of 22 chronic schizophrenic patients responding partially to neuroleptic treatment.Three of the 22 patients showed a clinically pronounced improvement both in positive and negative
symptoms
after
28
days
verapamil
administration.
It
was
subjective impression, that more patients would have improved if the study had been longer or if the doses of verapamil had been higher.
Our results
confirm the similar studies of Tourjman et al. (1987) and Bloom et al. (1987) and are in contrast
with general
lack of response noted by other authors
(Pickar et al. 1987, Grebb et al. 1986, Uhr et al. 1988). The mechanism by which verapamil exerts its adjunctive effects is unclear. Gould et al.
(1983) suggested
synergistically
that verapamil
to diminish dopaminergic
and
the neuroleptics
transmission,
through
acted
a calcium
channel blocking mechanism. The authors could not observe an improvement in the symptoms of tardive dyskinesia
after
treatment
However our population
with
did not
movements as their patients did.
as Reiter et al. (1989) did. show a severe grade abnormal involuntary verapamil
348
G.
Bartkoet&,
Conclusions The
results
neuroleptic to
the
suggest
treatment
necessity
therapeutic
that
of chronic
of
utility
verapamil
may
pursuing
controlled
of calcium
prove
schizophrenia.
channel
a
useful
The authors
investigations
blockers
adjunct
draw to
assess
in schizophrenic
to
attention the
patients.
References ANDREASEN,
N.C.
Iowa City, ANDREASEN,
N.C.
Iowa City, BARROWS,
D.M..
Biol.
GIANNINI,
Proc.
Natl.
N.P.V.
report.
effect
of
Prog.
Verapamil
in
Neuro-Psychopharmacol.
drugs.
Antischizophrenia
In: Abstracts
effects
IVth World
of
Congress
of
R.C.
Acad.
1-J.
type
(1983)
Antischizophrenic
act as calcium-channel
Sci. USA a:5122-5215
and TAYLOR, trial
E.H.
(1986)
of verapamil
A negative
in chronic
doubleblind
schizophrenia.
a:691-694 ECDEU
(1976)
ADM 76-338
Assessment
Washington
Manual DC, U.S.
for PsychopharmacologY Department
of Health,
Welfare and GORHAM,
Rep.
Psychiatry
Hillside
The Brief
(1962)
Psychiatric
Rating
Scale.
0. and DORAN, administration
A.
(1987)
Clinical
to schizophrenic
and biochemical
patients.
Arch.
s:113-119
(1987) J. Clin.
s., ADLER,
dyskinesia
D.J.
=:799-808
of verapamil
W.A.
=:26-27
(1987)
of antipsychotic
and REYNOLDS,
clinical
D., WOLKOWITZ,
effects
dyskinesia
=:1485
(1985)
R.
612.10).
K.M.M.
SHELTON,
J-E.
Psychol.
REITER,
A case
equivalence
No.
MURPHY,
(Ed)
Education
Gen.
An anti-tardive
and NAIR,
and LOISELLE,
Psychiatry
OVERALL,
Symptoms.
Psychiatry
Publication
PRICE,
Dose
controlled
W.
of Positive
u:185-188
(Abstract
J.A.,
Biol.
PICKAR,
(1986)
of the diphenylbutilpiperidine
placebo
Symptoms.
Res. 1:35-39
antagonists.
GUY.
A.
S.V.
A.J.
R-J.,
drugs
for the Assessment
TOURJMAN,
(1969)
Biological
GREBB.
Scale
schizophrenia.
verapamil
of Negative
of Iowa
Am. J. Psychiatry
Psychiatry J-M.
for the Assessment
[letter)
J. Psychiat.
GOULD,
(1981)
M. and CHILDS.
refractory
DAVIS,
Scale
of Iowa
University
verapamil. BLOOM,
(1981)
University
Antipsychotic Psychiatry and ANORIST,
and psychosis
effects
of verapamil
in schizophrenia.
2:225-230 B.(1989)
in schizophrenic
Effects
of verapamil
patients.
J. Clin.
on tardive Psychiatrl
Effects ofverapamil inchronicschizophrenia
SPITZER,
R-L.,
Criteria. TOURJMAN,
S.V.,
the treatment UHR,
S.B.,
ENDICOTT,
Rationale BLOOM,
Dr. Gyorgy Pilgrim Clinical
and VASAIVAN schizophrenia.
K. and BERGER,
on negative
and reprint
P.A.
symptoms
requests
Bartko
Psychiatric Neuroscience
Box A, Bldg.
Center Center
11
Brentwood,
U.S.A.
D.M.
(1978) Arch.
NAIR,
Research
Gen. N.P.
(1987)
Psychopharmacol. (1988)
of chronic
NY 11717
should
Diagnostic
Psychiatry
Effects
be addressed
to:
=:773-782
Verapamil Bull.
in
23:227-229
of verapamil
schizophrenia.
=:351-352
Inquires
West
E.
reliability.
of chronic
JACKSON,
administration Res.
J. and ROBINS, and
349
Psychiatr.