Vol.
94, No.
June
3. 1980
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 814.-819
16, 1980
EFFECTS OF ETHANOL AND ACETALDEHYDE ON THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF TESTOSTERONE IN THE RODENT TESTES Theodore
J.
Cicero
and Roy D. Bell
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Saint
Received
March
Washington University Louis, Missouri 63710
17,198O SUMMARY
The effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde on testicular steroidogenesis were examined in enzymatically dispersed cells of the rodent testes. Both drugs significantly inhibited gonadotropin-stimulated steroidogenesis, but acetaldehyde was considerably more potent (>lOOO times) than ethanol. To determine the step in testosterone's biosynthetic pathway which was inhibited by the two drugs, cells were incubated in the presence of [3H]pregnenolone and [3H]progesterone, and the amount of label incorporated into testosterone and its precursors was determined. Ethanol and acetaldehyde inhibited only the conversion of androstenedione to testosterone; none of the other precursors of testosterone was affected. INTRODUCTION Ethanol the male genesis
decreases
(l-4).
Ethanol
--in vitro,
but
which
mechanism
occurs
readily
support
of this
of testicular In the vitro isolate
formation
the step
in the
that
in vivo -__
biosynthesis
minimally
the effects
of ethanol
to acetal(9),
is
the
production.
In
to be a potent
inhibitor
concentrations
(6,9).
and acetaldehyde
precursors
of testosterone
affected
in an effort by the
ti to
two drugs.
AND METHODS
Enzymatically Dispersed Cell Preparations: were prepared as described previously (10). otropin-stimulated testosterone production --in Testosterone levels scribed previously (9). media were determined as described elsewhere 0006-291X/80/110814-06$01.00/0 Copyright 0 1980 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
steroido-
of ethanol
labeled
MATERIALS
in
at nonphysiological
of testosterone
at physiological
from
testicular
in vitro -___
has been found
of testosterone
administration
only
the metabolism
inhibition
--in vitro
we examined
its
occurred
but only
acetaldehyde
steroidogenesis studies
suggests
after
to suppress
inhibitions
ethanol's
conclusion
present on the
for
levels
been found
substantial This
responsible
testosterone
has also
(5-8).
concentrations dehyde,
serum
814
Enzymatically dispersed cells Studies of drug effects on gonadvitro were carried out as deand drug concentrations in the (9,101.
Vol. 94, No. 3, 1980
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Incubation with [3H]Progesterone and [3H]Pregnenolone: The isotopic purity of the LjHJprogesterone (56.5 Ci/mM) and L3HJpregnenolone (17.2 Ci/mM) was determined by TLC (11). Incubations were carried out as described above, but in these studies incubations contained [3H]pregnenolone or [3H]progesterone and ethanol or acetaldehyde. The concentrations of acetaldehyde and ethanol were selected on the basis of initial studies (see Figure 1) to provide a 30-50% inhibition of testicular steroidogenesis. This range was selected to provide significant decreases in testicular steroidogenesis without the possibility of nonspecific cellular toxicity which might occur at higher concentrations. Aliquots of the media were extracted with ethyl acetate and dried under a stream of N2. The residues were dissolved in methanol, containing carrier steroids, and were spotted on silica gel GF TLC plates. The plates were developed as described previously (11); the steroids were visualized with ultraviolet light or 5% phosphomolybdic acid. The spots were scraped from the plates and counted. The identity of the various steroids was determined by recrystallization to constant specific activity (12). Recoveries were found to be within 85-90% in all studies, and results are expressed as CPM incorporated into each product. Generation of Interferinq Compounds: To determine whether acetaldehyde or ethanol might spontaneously react with testosterone under our assay or extraction conditions to form a compound which would comigrate with one of the steroids examined, 50 nCi testosterone was incubated with 100 PM acetaldehyde or 200 mM ethanol under the incubation conditions described above, except that no cells were included. The media were extracted and subjected to TLC as described above. RESULTS Effects shown
in Figure
testicular whereas
of Ethanol
and Acetaldehvde
1, ethanol
steroidogenesis ethanol
and acetaldehyde ; however,
was effect
on Testicular
ive
inhibited
acetaldehyde
at mM0lar
Steroidoqenesis:
As
gonadotropin-stimulated was effective
at UMolar,
concentrations.
ACETALDEHYDE
ETHANOL
10
1000 1
10’
ooJ-----2 IO 20 ‘lo 60 PERCENT
2
10
20
40
60
INHIBITION
Figure
1. The effects of acetaldehyde and ethanol, expressed as percent inhibition, on human menopausal gonadotropin-stimulated (5 mIU) testosterone production in intact enzymatically dispersed cells of the rodent testes. Values arethemeans of three experiments carried out in triplicate. Standard errors averaged less than 52 of the mean at all points.
815
Vol.
94, No.
3, 1980
8lOCHEMlCAL
Effects
of
AND
8lOPHYSlCAL
RESEARCH
TABLE 1 on the incorporation
acetaldehyde
Precursor
of
[3H]pregnenolone
%a
Control
COMMUNICATIONS
Acetaldehyde
%a
Pregnenolone
2,858.0
(t114.8)
5.0
2,810.O
(t183.4)
4.7
Progesterone
5,802.g
(k308.4)
10.3
6,531.l
(k656.0)
10.9
17-a-hydroxyprogesterone
1,260.8
(2137.5)
2.2
1,379.5
(t194.8)
2.3
Androstenedione
21,775.l
(~568.2)
38.4
30,368.3
(k877.8)
51.1b
Testosterone
24,886.6
(t921.4)
43.9
18,303.5
(i472.3)
30.8'
Total
56,583.4
100
59,392.4
100
The effects of acetaldehyde (100 uM) on the incorporation of L3H]pregnenolone into the precursors of testosterone via the preferred route of metabolism. Dispersed cells were pr5pared as described in the Methods section and were incubated with 1.25 nCi [ H]pregnenolone with or without 100 UN acetaldehyde. Values are Imeans (?SEM) CPM representing three experiments carried out in tripaPercent of total CPM (botton line); bsignificantly higher (~~0.01) licate. when compared to control; csignificantly lower (~~0.01) when compared to control.
Effects
of
Acetaldehyde
Testosterone:
The
nenolone
into
"preferred" only
effects
in
conversion lation
of
the of
of
biosynthesis
in
and
a proportional
also
with
examined Effects
gesterone
into
of
testosterone
to
testosterone; in
preferred in
CPM
CPM
in
of in
in
in
of
in
the
Table
the
CPM
in
1 for
rodent
significantly
[3H]preg-
testes.
The
affected was
was
a significant cells,
accumu-
The
its
to
effects
biosynthesis and
the
relative
testosterone.
testosterone
the
and
precursors
of on
the
were
results. on
the
Incorporation The
testosterone
of
effects
of
and
its
Ethanol
biosynthesis). androstenedione,
testosterone.
shown
acetaldehyde-treated
into
Testosterone:
route
are
testosterone's
identical
into
incorporation
there
into
[3H]Pregnenolone
the
biosynthesis
drop
Ethanol
[3H]pregnenolone
in
precursors
[3H]progesterone
of
of on
onthenonpreferrodrouteof of
drop
its
androstenedione
incorporation
crease
Incorporation
testosterone's
androstenedione
acetaldehyde
the
acetaldehyde
and
CPM
controls,
of
testosterone route
step
on
when Similar
ethanol precursors selectively
compared results
816
[3H]Preqnenolone
to were
on
and
the
are
r3H]Pro-
incorporation shown
caused
in
of Table
2 (the
a significant
controls
and
a corresponding
obtained
when
C3H]progester-
in-
Vol.
94, No.
3, 1980
BIOCHEMICAL
Effects
of
ethanol
AND
TABLE 2 incorporation
on the
Precursor
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
of
Control
COMMUNICATIONS
[3H]pregnenolone
79
Ethanol
%a
Pregnenolone
4,829.7
(2
701.5)
11.1
4,782.4
(k
240.1)
10.5
Progesterone
6,853.Z
(k
640.4)
15.8
6,982.6
(+ 920.2)
15.3
17-a-hydroxyprogesterone
2,579.z
(k
171.4)
5.9
2,392.6
(k
Androstenedione
18,156.0
(k1440.6)
41.9
23,779.8
Testosterone
10,862.Z
(i- 998.3)
25.0
7,492.2
Total
43,280.3
The effects the precursors merits carried apercent of compared to
one
was
of
as the precursor
Spontaneous
cursor
(k1765.2)
52.3b
(t
16.4'
531.9)
45,429.6
100
ethanol (200 mM) on the incorporation of [3H]pre9nenolone into of testosterone. Values are means (GEM) CPM of three exoeriout in triplicate. (See le 8. end to . Table T for further deteils). the total CPM (bottom line); slgnlflcantly higher (~~0.01) when control; csignificantly lower (~~0.01) when compared to control.
testosterone
etaldehyde
5.3
of
employed
route
100
404.5)
and
biosynthesis
Generation
affected
when
was
either
the
preferred
or
nonpreferred
examined.
of Interfering
Compounds:
the CPM in testosterone,
Neither
ethanol
androstenedione,
nor ac-
or any other
pre-
of testosterone. DISCUSSION The
ular
present
results
steroidogenesis
tosterone.
Both
corresponding precursors incorporated
and the CPM in
an accumulation
was
testosterone
can
conversion
affected.
completely
- at
has been only for
of
account
steroidogenesis
pathway
inhibition
testosterone;
to
least
one other
testosterone.
for
testic-
to tes-
the
in
offset of
other in
CPM
gonadotropin-
radioimmunoassay
conversion and
reduction
reduction
by
and a
none of the
percent
completely
ethanol in
the
measured
the
block
of CPM in androstenedione
corresponded as
acetaldehyde
of androstenedione
Since
in CPM in androstenedione an
and
into
production,
testosterone,
There synthetic
caused
testosterone
tosterone ticular
the
testosterone
increase
ethanol
in CPM incorporated
into
stimulated
that
by inhibiting drugs
fall of
indicate
(Figure
the
reduction
androstenedione
acetaldehyde's
l),
effects
in to
tes-
on
tes-
vitro.
study
of the
Gordon
817
effects
et a1.(13)
of ethanol reported
on the that
rats,
bio-
Vol.
94, No.
3, 1980
chronically
maintained
nase activity. cit,
genesis
of its
whether one,
the enzyme
involved
that
in preliminary
competitively
shown
that
reverse
steroidogenesis
The possibility
that
ethanol
out
acetaldehyde, version
completely
in both the
to be best
and it
likelihood
explained
to the clearly
admin-
the --in vivo however,
of this
enzyme was
enzyme does not that
in the
In fact,
we have on tes-
Thus,
effects
re-
a change
or acetaldehyde
although
of ethanol
not required
that
favor blocking
studies. appears
acetaldehyde
to androstenedione simply
ethanol
about
observations).
than
in our
reactions
of testosterone
to testoster-
activity.
and acetaldehyde
cannot
involved
of ethanol
examine
for
and acet-
the drugs
to
the
However,
or ethanol
inhibition
reaction
forward
since
reaction,
the same enzyme
to be competitively
seems remote.
by a drug-induced
the reverse
inhibited
enhances Thus,
by
the con-
our
data
seem
of 17-B-hydroxysteroid
oxidoreductase. In the present potent
than
ethanol
and much earlier tions
both
studies
ethanol
we found
in inhibiting work
(5,6,9),
a
steroidogenesis.
to androstenedione,rather
is
effects
is
not
be noted,
this
on its
may contribute
of testosterone be ruled
as a re-
time
seems improbable
(unpublished
testicular
occurring
activity
effects
such an alteration
block
that
Moreover, it
the
--in vitro
in the NAD/NADH ratio
significantly
thus,
ethanol's
not
steroid0
by chronic
should
defi-
on testicular
did
present
the
explain
--in vivo,
at the
we have found
state
NAD+ did
was affected
by acetaldehyde.
this
of androstenedione
studies
redox
aldehyde
conversion
It
(14);
reversed
et a1.(13)
we have observed.
NAD+ as a cofactor
change
Gordon
COMMUNICATIONS
in A5-3B-dehydroge-
of ethanol
effects
quire
ticular
effect
can be drawn
inhibited
could
deficiency
NAD+ completely
oxidoreductase,
of the
RESEARCH
in the NAD+/NADH ratio,
in the
so no conclusions
significance
the
Unfortunately,
17-B-hydroxysteroid
istration
that
that
was due to a change
metabolism.
BIOPHYSICAL
had a marked
however,
them to conclude
in vivo
AND
on ethanol,
They found,
leading
sult
BIOCHEMICAL
that
testicular suggest
and acetaldehyde
that
actaldehyde
steroidogenesis. under
may be involved
818
was considerably
in vivo -__
These and in vitro
in inhibiting
more results, condi-
testicular
Vol.
94, No.
3, 1980
steroidogenesis these
BIOCHEMICAL
and that
acetaldehyde
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
may be the
RESEARCH
primary
agent
COMMUNICATIONS
responsible
for
effects. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported in part by USPHS grants AA-03242 and AA-03539. Cicero is a recipient of Research Scientist Development Award AA-70180.
Dr.
REFERENCES 1.
Cicero,
T. J.,
and Badger,
T. M. (1977)
J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther.
201,
427-433. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Gordon, G. G., Southren, A. L., and Lieber, C. S. (1978) Ale. Clin. Exp. Res. 2, 259-269. Mendelson, J. H., Mello, N. K., and Ellingboe, J. (1977) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 202, 676-682. Van Thiel, D. H., Gavaler, J., Lester, R., and Goodman, M. 0. (1975) Gastroenterology 69, 326-332. Badr, F. M., Bartke, A., Dalterio, S., and Bulger, M. (1977) Steroids 30,
647-655. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.
Cobb, C. F., Ennis, M. F., Van Thiel, D. H., Gavaler, J. S., and Lester, R. (1980) Metabolism 29, 71-79. Ellingboe, J., and Varanelli, C. E. (1979) Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 24, 87-102. Gordon, G. G., Southren, A. L. Vittek, J., and Lieber, C. S. (1979) Metabolism 28, 20-24. Cicero, T. J., Bell, R. D., Meyer, E. R., and Badger, T. M. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., in press. Dufau, M. L., Mendelson, C., and Catt, K. J. (1974) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 39, 610-613. Burstein, S., Hunter, S. A., Shoupe, T. S., and Taylor, P. (1978) Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 19, 557-560. Axelrod, L. R., Matthyssen, C., Goldzieher, J. W., and Pulliam, J. E. (1965) Acta Endocrinol. 49, Suppl. 99. Gordon, G. G., Vittek, J., Southren, A. L., Munnangi, P., and Lieber, C. S Endocrinology, in press. Inano, H., and Tamaoki, B. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 44, 13-23.
819