Effects of piposulfan (ancyte) on protein and DNA synthesis in ehrlich ascites carcinoma

Effects of piposulfan (ancyte) on protein and DNA synthesis in ehrlich ascites carcinoma

Life Sciences Vol . 10, Part II, pp. 605-812, 1971 . Printed in Great Britain Pergamon Press EFFECTS OF PIPOSIII.FAN (ANCYTE) ON PROTEIN AND DNA SYN...

259KB Sizes 0 Downloads 56 Views

Life Sciences Vol . 10, Part II, pp. 605-812, 1971 . Printed in Great Britain

Pergamon Press

EFFECTS OF PIPOSIII.FAN (ANCYTE) ON PROTEIN AND DNA SYNTHESIS IN EHRLICH ASCITES CARCINOMA Tobias 0 . Yellin* Dept . of Chaoical Pharmacology, Abbott T.aboratoriee, North Chicago,I11 .60064

(Received 1 March 1971; in final form 12 April 1971) summary

The effectn of the difuactional alkylating agent piposulfan on DNA, RNA and protein synthesis were studied in cell auspeasiona of Shrlich ancitas carcinoma derived from mice treated with the drug . Piposulfaa did not act like a typical alkylating agent . It iahibitad the incorporation of 3H - thymidine and markedly increased that of 14C -leucine without affecting thn labeling bq 3H uridine of TCA insoluble material . The effects of the drug were delayed fos about 16 hours .

Piponulfan (Ancyta) or N,N'-bie-(3-methylsulfonyloxy)-piperazine is a member of a narlen of neutral, difunctional alkylating agents studied at Abbott Laboratorien for their aatineoplantic activity (1,2) .

The first member of the

series, pipobroman (Vercyte~, is presently in clinical use for the treatment of polycythamia vera and chronic granulocytic leukemia . piponulfan sad pipobraman are nhown in Figure 1 .

The structures of

Like the parent compound,

piponulfaa (NSC 47774) showed a wide npactrum of antitumor activity in animals (3,4) sad has undergone clinical trials .

The results demonstrated activity

against lynphamas, chronic granulocytic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and polycythemia vara (5) .

In this communication we report our initial studies

concerning the ponsible mode of action of piposulfan . The mechanism of action of alkylatiag agents is unknown (reviews, 6-9) . It in difficult to determine their primary site of action because they can react with a wide variety of nucleophiles within the cell including proteins * Prenant address :

Department of Pharmacology, Smith, Küne end French Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pe .

605

608

Effect oaf Alkylating Agents

Vol. 10, No . 11

and nucleic acids and, therefore, can cause many diverse biochemical lesions . An appropriate example is busulfan (Myleran) .

Like pipoaulfan, busulfan is a

difunctional alkylating agent of the alkylaulfonic eater type

(see Fig. 1) .

Buaulfan has been shown to alkylate proteins and nucleic acids (1 U) ; to be FIG . 1

I+ Il CH3-S-0-CHZ-CHZ-C-N, G 0 Pipoaulfan

~

II II N-C-CHZ-OS-CH3

(Ancyte)

CH3-S-0-CHZ-CHZ-CH Z-CHZ-O-S-CH3

li

II

0

0 Busulfan (Myleran®)

0 . ._ 0 u , Br-CHZ-CHZ-C-N, , ~N-C-CHZ-CHZ-Br Pipobruman (Vercyte ®) incorporated into DNA (11) ; to react with cyateine and other thiola in vivo (la) ; t~~ ini~ibit .)NA synthesis (13) ; to inhi~it mitosis and cause giant cell '.urination (14) ; to inhibit spermatogenesis in rata (15) ; to cause mutations in ~?rosophilia

(16) ; and to inhibit crystalline trioeephosphate dehydrogenase (17) .

Uf course we could expect a similar multiplicity of action with pipoaulfan and consequently difficulty in determining the mechanism of ite antitumor activity .

Nevertheless, it was of interest to question how it might be typical

or atypical of this class of drugs . Materials and Methods î,e11 Line Ehrlich ascitea carcinoma subline ES-III a'/357 was obtained from A.D . Little ~ Co ., Cambridge, Mass ., and maintained here by weekly transplant in

Effect od Alkylating Agents

Vol . 10, No . 11

807

Swiss-Webster male mice (25-35 gm) . Cell Couat and Viability Cell coasts ware done with the aid of a hemocytometer .

Viability was

calculated from the total number of cells minus the number of cells staining with Trypaa Blue (0 .07x) divided by the total number of cells . Assay of Macramolecular Synthesis At appropriate times, cell were removed from the peritoneal cavity and washed in Eagle's M~I, pH 7 .

Five to ten million cells from each animal were

suspended, in duplicate, in two mls of Eagle's MEM (Hank's salts) with 2mM glutamine, pH 7 .2, containing radioactive precursor and incubated for 1 hour at 37 ° C in air, with shaking .

Protein, RNA and DNA synthesis was measured

as TCA insoluble radioactivity from uridine (500 mCi/mmol) sad

14 C - leucine (311 mCi/mmol),

3H -

3fi -thymidine (500 mCi/mmol) respectively .

The

reaction was stopped with 3 ml of Sx TCA containing 1 mg/ml cold precursor and the mixture centrifuged .

The cells were washed again is TCA, then in

ethanol and twice more is athaaol :ether (3 :1) .

The residue was dried in a

water bath, dissolved in 0 .5 ml formic acid and the radioactivity determined in liquid scintillation spectrometer . Results and Discussion Table 1 gives the results of a representative experiment designed to teat the effects of piposulfaa on DNA, RNA and protein synthesis is vivo .

Seven

days after transplaatatioa (106 cells), six mice were randomized into two equal groups .

Group C received two iatraperitoneal (i .p .) injections of 0 .5

ml saline and group X vas given two injections of 100 mg/kg of pipoaulfan i .p . in saline seven hours apart .

The aaimala were sacrificed 24 hours after the

first treatment sad the tumor cells processed as described under Materials sad Methods .

The data show a 48S increase in the rata of protein synthesis,

no significant change in. RNA synthesis and a 25x decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis in carcinoma cells from animals treated with piposulfan .

Evidently

these effects would precede a "clinical" response to pipoaulfan since neither

808

Effect oaf Alkylating Agents

Yol . 10, No. 11

cell viability nor cell count was significantly altered bq the drug at this time .

Routine microscopic examination showed no noticeable difference in

appearance between control and experimental calls . A similar pattern of activity was found in preliminary experiments using the secitea form of the 4lalker 256 sarcoma is rate . TABLE 1 Effects of Piposulfan on Macromolecular Synthesis and Cell Count in Ehrlich Asc hes Carcinoma After One Day . of Treatment Total Cell Count Lilliona~

Cell Viability

Mouse

_TCA Insol . Radioactivity (CPM) 1 Leuçine Uridine Th~m idine

C1

17,243

82,289

22,849

225

98

C2

14,722

80,736

22,068

400

90

C3

14,485

88,641

17,940

190

95

Average 2 15,480

83,922

20,952

272

94

± 879

*- 2407

~ 1523

X1

27,508

83,765

17,488

189

95

X2

23,785

80,014

17,645

204

95

X3

17,885

94,557

15,792

330

90

Average

23,059

86,109

15,792

241

93

t 2802

± 4360

± 1775

148

102

75

89

99

~ of Control

7

l Cell number was identical in all tubes,. 2 Averages are given ± S .E . Table 2 shows the results of an experiment similar to the one above except that the tumors were treated for two days (2 x 100 mg/kg/day) . Here we observe pronounced effects on protein and DNA synthesis again without

Vol . 10, No. 11

Effect ad Alkylating Agents

significant change in ßNA synthesis .

609

Dote also the marked reduction in cell

count indicating a therapeutic response to piposulfan .

Since viability re-

mains unchanged at this time, ae might surmise that mitosis has been arrested by the drug . cell volume

Consistent with this, ae observed a definite lncreaae in the (giant cells) of the carcinoma cells from treated animals after

tao days . TABLE 2 ßffecte of Piposulfan on Macromolecular 5yntheaia and Cell Count in Ehrlich Asches Carcinoma After ~o Days of Treatment Total Cell Count (millions)

Cell Viability X

22,537

189

95

95,527

21,232

180

86

19,587

72,437

24,599

105

98

Average2 19,357

86,984

22,786

158

93

t 373

t 7311

t 980

X1

29,.915

66,522

13,111

39

100

XZ

53,983

95,456

17,012

60

94

X3

40,177

76,924

15,118

39

93

Average

41,358

79,634

15,080

46

93

t 6973

t 8462

± 1126

213

91

66

29

103

Mouse

TCA Insol . ßadioactivity (CPM)1 Laudas Uridino Thymidine

C1

19,857

92,988

C2

18,628

C3

X of Control

1 Cell number ass identical in all tubes. 2 Averages are given t S .ß . Table 3 sussarises additional experiments similar to the ones described above .

It may be seen that the effects of piposulfaa on protein sad DdiA syn-

thesis became evident betaean 16 and 24 hours after drug administration and

810

Effect ad Alkylating Agents

becona pronauad at later times .

Vol. 10, No . 11

We do not know if the drug affects the syn-

thasis of DNA sad protein independently of each other .

It would be interesting

to learn what effect piposulfan may have on protein synthesis in systems where nucleic acid synthesis is not present, as in reticulocytes, for example . TABLE 3 Effects of Pipoaulfan on Labeling of DNA and Protein

Bty. #1 1

(3)

2

(6)

3

Treatmant2 (nft/ka i .p .)

Time of Sacrifica3 (Hours)

504

Incorporation of Precursor as of Control ThS+midine Leucine

x

16

90

114

2 x 25

24

89

142

(6)

2 x 50

24

77

149

4

(3)

50

40

73

196

5

(3)

2 x 50

48

56

296

1 The number of mice per group is given in parentheses . 2 Where two injections were given they were seven hours apart on the first day of treatment, 3 Time given from the first injection. 4 The i .p . LD50 of piposulfan in Swiss-Webster mice is 400 mg/kg (4) . Table 4 gives the results of experiments in which DNA synthesis was measured 2 and 4 hours after a single intraperitoneal dose of 200 mg/kg of pipoaulfan or pipobroman (3 animals/group) .

Pipobraman, which seems to act

like a "typical" alkylating agent (see below), differs from piposulfan in having bramiaa instead of methylsulfonic acid as the leaving group in reactions with nuclaophilas (see Figure 1) and it is interesting to note that this makes quite a difference biologically .

In contrast to drastic inhibition of DNA

synthesis by pipobrae~an, piposulfaa had no effect at 2 and 4 hours after drug adniaistration .

Neither drug affected protein synthesis at these times but

pipobranan slightly inhibited (ca, 25x) RNA synthesis at 4 hours.

Vol. 10, No . 11

Effect ad Alkylating Agents

611

TABLE 4 Comparison of the Effect of Piposulfaa sad Pipobroman on DNA Syathesis l Two sad Four Hours After Drug Administration

Sam~e2

Time of Sacrifice

Average Radioactivity t S~E~ ~PM)

Relative Açtivity

Controle

2

12805 t 867

100

Piposulfan

2

13809 t 451

108

Pipobroman

2

2629 t 360

21

Controls

4

8773 t 1136

100

Piposulfan

4

9301 t 487

106

Pipobroman

4

1770 t 367

20

1 Incorporation of 3H-thymidine into TCA insoluble material . 2 Each group had three mice . 3 Cell number Was identical in all tubes . Among other possibilities, such se inhibition of the biosynthesis of a vital cell component and its subsequent exhaustion from the cell, the delayed onset of activity with pipoaulfan may indicate a site of action which ie available during only part of the cell cycle .

Future experiments using

synchronized cultures could prove useful to our understanding of its mode of action and of cell biology .

Its effect on protein syatheeis merits further

study in itself and here also pipoaulfan may prove to be a useful biochemical tool . References 1.

J . A . CARBON, S . M . BREM aàd J . D, RATAJCZYK, Abstr . Paper, 139th Meeting, Am . Chem . Soc . (1961) .

2.

R, J . STEIN, J . A . CARBON, J . LANGDON and R, K, RICHARDS, J . Lab . Clin . Med . 5 6 :949 (1960) .

3.

Sloan-KetterinA Tumor Spectrum Studies , SK#24591, (1961) .

4.

T . J, MCNAIR, F . A, WIBIN, E . T, HOPPE, J, L . SCHMIDT and F, A, dePEYSTER, J . S4rft . Res . _, 130 (1963) .

612

Effect of Alkylating Agents

Vol. 10, No . 11

5.

N. A, NELSON, R, W. TALLEY, M. L. REED, A, M, EVANS, B. L . ISAACS, P. RUFFItAN and J. LOUIS, Clin . Pharmacol, Therau . 8, 385 (1967) .

6.

A. HADDOW ;

7.

G, P, WHEELER,

Cancer Rea .

22, 651 (1962) .

8,

G, P, WARWICK,

Cancer Rea,

23, 1315 (1963) .

9.

H. VERMIAZD and F . F, COLL7N,

10 .

E, G. TRAMS, M, V . NADRARNI, V. DEQUATTRO, D, MAStiGWYN-DAVIES and P, K. SMITH, Biochem, Pharmacol. 2, 7 (1959) .

Physiopatholomr of Cancer , p . 602, N, Y., Hoeber Prese (1959) .

Cancer

21, 58 (1968) .

11 .

E, G. TRAMS, M. V, NADKARNI and P. K. SMITH,

12 .

J . J. ROBERTS and G. P. WARWICK, Biochem. Pha:macol .

13 .

J. G. LI, M. E, LEONARD and G . HARRISON,

14 .

R, BASSLEER,

15 .

K. A. AHLQUIST,

16 .

0, G. FAHM1f and J, J. FAHMY,

17 .

H. HOLZER,

Comet . Read . Soc . Biol . J. Reurod . Fart .

Cancer Rea.

Cancer

21, 560 (1961) .

6, 216 (1961 ; .

9, 963 (1956) .

~, 237 (1965) .

12, 377 (1966) .

J. Genetics

46, 361 (1961) .

Die Mediziniache , 576 (1956) ; CA 50, 10257 (1966) .