Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
BIOCHEMICAL
ELIMINATION FROM
AND BIOPHYSICAL
OF RESIDUAL
PURIFIED
RNase
PREPARATIONS
DIRECTED
DNA
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ACTIVITY OF RNA-
POLYMERASE
Marc
S. Collett and Anthony J. Faras Department of Microbiology University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Received
September
30,197s SUMMARY
Preparations of RNA-directed DNA polymerase purified from RNA tumor viruses by standard methods generally contain trace amounts of single-stranded RNA endonucleolytic activity detectable only by relatively sensitive methods. This contaminating RNase activity has been found to be completely inhibited when RNA-directed DNA poIymerase reactions are carried out in the presence of low concentrations of bentonite. Under these conditions, only minimal inhibition of the DNA polymerase and RNase H activities of the RNA-directed DNA polymerase was observed. INTRODUCTION The
RNA-directed
has been
purified
of various gel
by a wide
combinations
filtration,
purity
DNA
DNA
presence
of nuclease
interested genome
transcription.
Copyright All rights
DNA
analysis
activities
(other
to elucidate
of RNA-directed
Q I9 75 b.v Academic Press. inc. of reproduction in anv form reserved.
DNA
of protein
RNase
for
polymerase. 946
our
have
consisted
(i-7).
for
We have
been
70s
RNA
oncornavirus mechanisms
However,
by
by sodium
and assays
studies
The
assessed
bands
H) (8,9).
the reaction
viruses
chromatography,
has been
of the avian
prerequisite
of which
electrophoresis,
than
transcription
in an effort
A necessary
gel
tumor
chromatography
preparations
activity,
RNA
most
and affiniQ
polyacrylamide
in the --in vitro into
preparations
(SDS)
with
ion-exchange
fractionation,
polymerase
of specific
sulfate
associated
of procedures,
centrifigation
of oncornavirus
dodecyl
variety
of salt
velocity
determinations
polymerase
is highly relatively
of
the
reverse
purified few
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
reports
of
of
the
(1
- 4).
extensive
DNA
DNA
polymerase
polymerase
remain
(9).
This
it in
the
a single
evidence
DNA
the
reaction on be
either
detected
g. of in
In
residual
This
the
RNA-directed the
including
presence
MATERIALS
may this
of
appropriate
AND
not
be
most
detectable
alter we
activity concentrations
by when
--in
vitro the
in
that
nature
present
contaminating DNA
concentrations selective
polymerases
critical
routinely
RNA-directed
the
activity DNA
completely
polymerase
from
polymerase
activity
appears DNA
be
purity
endonucleolytic
communication
low
inhibition
may
DNA
RNase
remove
a ribonuclease
may
of avian by
to
which
template
the
addressed
oncornavirus
RNA-directed
preparations
mixtures.
such
purified
reaction. the
difficult
of
which
rigorously
RNA
activib,
RNA
in
been
solubilization),
the
eliminated
in
most
highly
RNase
the
has
amounts
RNA
polymerase
completely
trace
of
(e.
purified
be
can
amount
that
proved
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
appeared
a single-stranded
of even
scission
conventionally
effect
fractions
indicating
can
that
capabilities
chain true
has is
appears
methods
evaluating
the
which
residual
conventional
have obtained
preparations
since
may
purification
preparation
A contaminant
activity
of
enzyme
AND BIOPHYSICAL
polymerases of
since
bentonite little,
or RNase of
the
in if
any,
H activity inhibitor.
METHODS
Reagents. C3H]-thymidine triphosphate (53 Ci/mM) a;d [3H1-poly (rA) (19 mC/mM) were obtained from Schwarz Bioresearch. [ HI-uridine (20 Ci/mM) was from Nuclear Dynamics. The sources and preparation of other pertinent materials have been described previously (1, IO). Cells and virus. The 677 strain (subgroup C) of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) was propagated in duck embryo fibroblasts and purified as previously described (1 1). The preparation of RSV 70s RNA and [3H]-uridine labeled 705 RNA have been reported previously (11 - 13). DNA polymerase reaction. Avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) DNA polymerase, obtained from J. W. Beard of Life Sciences, Inc., St. Petersberg, Florida, through the auspices of the Special Virus Program of the National Cancer Institute was purified as described by Kacian and Spiegelman (14). Two preparations were employed in these studies, V74-17, and V75-2. AMV 70s RNA was purified by previously described methods (1 1 - 13). Standard DNA polymerase reaction mixtures contained 0. 1 M Tris:HCl, pH 8. 1; 0.01 M MgC12; 2% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol; 6 x 10 -5 P/I unlabeled deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dATP, dCTP and dGTP); 5.9 x 10v5 M unlabeled TTP; 1 x lo-6M
947
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
[3H]-TTP; 5 m/ml 70s RNA; 50 units/ml AMV DNA polymerase (I, 15). Reactions (50 ~1) were carried out at 37” for 1 hr and the incorporation of radiolabel into acid-precipitable material was determined as previously described (16). RNase H assay. The RNase H activib was assayed using [3H]-(rA)n* (dT)l216 as substrate. The components of the standard RNase H reaction mixtures-using the AMV DNA polymerase were the same as those for the DNA polymerase reaction described above except that 70s RNA and all dNTPs were omitted and [3H]-(rA)* (dT)l2-18 included. Reactions (50 ~1) were carried out at 37’ for 1 hr and the RNase H activity determined as reported previously (17, Collett and Faras, submitted for publication). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. viral RNA in 2.25% polyacrylamide published (1). The exact conditions legend to Figure 4. Preparation of bentonite. Bentonite previously reported (18).
The gels of
of the viously in the as
was
procedures used were essentially electrophoresis
washed
and
for as are
sorted
the analyses those predescribed
essentially
RESULTS Effect
of
bentonite
on
01
the
DNA
I
polymerase
I 40
BENTONITE
1
and
I 80
CONCENTRATION
1
RNase
I 120
H activities
RNA-
I
lvglml)
Figure 1. Effect of bentonite on the DNA polymerase and in purified preparations of RNA-directed DNA polymerase. merase and RNase H activities were assayed as described and Methods. Each duplicate 50 yl reaction was incubated concentrations of bentonite for 1 hr at 37”. Symbols: 0, DNA polymerase activity 4 RNase H activity
948
of
RNase The
H activities DNA poly-
in the Materials with the indicated
Vol.
67,
No.
3,
directed
DNA
isolation
of
tively
1975
RNAs
of
the
to
effect in
purified
viral
DNA
--in
vivo
DNA
polymerase As
21
can
in
Figure
of
capable
that
the
particular
centration
by
C3H]-labeled of
AMV
complete
DNA
bentonite
70s
subunits is
degradation
the
incubation
949
oncornavirus-
synthesis
of proviral
polypeptide
a gradual
RNase
bentonite
as
the
on
this
and
H activities
template.
with
To
in activity
was
an
in the
Figure absence upon
mixtures,
pre-
monitored containing
of
such
determine
purified
mixtures
(1).
However,
and
to be
RNA
presented
used. the
the
denatured
in
use
polymerase
of
reaction
from
occurred
in
DNA
contamination
was
I
first
concentrations
RNA
polymerase
present
viral
in
DNase
possible
effect
RNase
RNA
of
mixture.
centrifugation
RNA
preparation
the
selec-
investigated
same
reaction
the
varying
rate-zonal viral
RNA enzyme
the
the
and
RNase
and
1 hr,
analyzed
of
eliminating
70s
of
on
the
to
polymerase
in
appears
of
viral
period
preparation
integrity
polymerase
a role
tested
in
also
of
AMV
purified
polymerase
[‘HI-labeled
subunits
seen
of
DNA
bentonite
the
the
the
preparations
since
play
there
potymerase,
DNA
of
on
1,
the of
the
also
DNA
incubation
profiles
both
in
on
reside
RNA-directed
incubating
RNA
of
of bentonite
RNA-directed an
seen
to we
the
therefore
bentonite
to
and
investigate
Furthermore,
appears
be
concentrations
was
and
24),
increasing
bentonite
We
thought
20)
during
preparations
contamination
template. is
used
(19,
to
containing
(3,
inhibition
by
as
- 23)
interest
of
COMMUNICATIONS
occasionally
commercial
RNase
activity
coordinate
Effect
of
RESEARCH
activities
polymerase.
H activity
(8,
was
reactions RNA
RNase
DNA
in
concentrations
70s
been
RNase
residual
reconstructed
associated
parations
it
eliminate
of various
activity.
general
Thus,
BIOPHYSICAL
has
RNases
RNA-directed
activity
if
inhibit
(18).
bentonite
purified
to
contaminating
oc-amylase
AND
Bentonite
polymerase.
remove
and
BIOCHEMICAL
bentonite.
After
and
the
resulting
The
sedimentation
analysis 2. of
with It
can
bentonite
increasing RNA
be with
the subunit
one
con-
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
integriw tion
can by
these
the
identical
may
RNase be
the
activities
of AMV
with
DNA
pol
exposure used
RNA
ymerase. to
enzyme
we
and
two to
different
IO FRACTION
and
is
45%
of
the
the
at
control
80
degrada
pg/ml.
values
preparations
to
compared
purity,
of
Under DNA
of
depicted
20 NUMBER
0
950
effects
using
particular,
of
bentonite
viral is
in
in
different
C3H]-labeled
preparations
purified
and
the
integrity
integrity
results
included
against
remained.
respect
have
enzyme
protected
enzyme
template The
obtain
bentonite
different
vary
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
completely
respectively,
that
contamination,
enzymatic
nearly
66%
case may
AND BIOPHYSICAL
when
H activity,
procedures
ribonuclease
is
approximately and
it
and
preparation
conditions,
As
The
maintained
enzyme
polymerase
after
be
BIOCHEMICAL
panel
compared B o/75-2)
by
on
preparations RNA
subunits
in
Figure
showed
3. no
Vol.
67, No.
3, 1975
BIOCHEMICAL
acid-solubilization period
(Table
35). of
of I),
A second
was
included
subunits
RNA weight
in
both
caused
(Table RNA
w/ml
cases
I),
in was
BIOPHYSICAL
28s
ribosomal
appreciable
preparation
viral
at 32
HI-labeled
still
enzyme
radiolabeled
molecular
but
3
[
AND
caused
subunits enzymatic dramatically
RNA RNA
(V74-17)
which
the
RESEARCH
subunit
reactions, improved
a
1 hr
of
However, the
the
when
integriw
(Figure
(Figure solubilization
degradation
3C).
incubation
degradation
demonstrated
complete
(Figure
after
COMMUNICATIONS
of 36,
C).
high
bentonite the
RNA
Under
Figure 2. Integrity of the viral RNA subunits following incubation in the presence of a purified preparation of AMV DNA polymerase. Incubation mixtures (50 l~.l), ,carried out in 0.02 M Tris:HCl, pH 7.4, 0. OlM EDTA, contained 5 pg/ml unlabeled 70s RNA, 9000 cpm of C3H]-labeled RSV 70s RNA (from virus harvested at 4 hr intervals), 50 units/ml AMV DNA polymerase (preparation V7417), and the indicated concentration of bentonite. After 1 hr at 37’C, reaction mixtures were made 0. 1M EDTA, 500 pg/ml predigested Pronase, and 0.5% SDS. After 20 min at 37’, nucleic acids were extracted with STE (0. 1M NaCl, 0.02M Tris:HCl, pH 7.4, 0.01 M EDTA)-saturated phenol. Samples were then diluted into TE buffer (0.02M Tris:HCl, pH 7.4, 0. OlM EDTA), heated to 100’ for 80 seconds, and rapidly quenched in ice water. The mixtures were then layered onto 15-300/o sucrose gradients and centrifuged in an SW50. 1 rotor at 50,000 rpm for 225 min at 4O. A.
6.
Viral RNA subunit profile after incubation in the absence of AMV DNA polymerase, 0; incubation in the presence of AMV enzyme, 0; incubation in the presence of AMV enzyme and 8 Pg/ml bentonite,A. Viral RNA subunit profile after incubation in the presence of AMV enzyme and 32 pg/ml (0) and 80 pg/ml (0) bentonite.
Figure 3. Integrity of the viral RNA subunits following incubation with different preparations of purified AMV DNA polymerase and either the presence or absence of bentonite. Reaction mixtures (50 ~1) were as described in the Materials and Methods for the DNA olymerase reaction, except that ZP all dNTPs were omitted and 9000 cpm of [ HI-labeled RSV 705 RNA was included per reaction. Two different preparations of AMV DNA polymerase were analysed as described in the legend to Figure 2 in the presence (32 pg/ml) and absence of bentonite. A. Viral RNA subunit profile after incubation in the absence of AMV DNA polymerase at 4’, 0; at 37’, 0. 6. Viral RNA subunit profile after incubation at 37” in the presence of AMV DNA polymerase (preparation V75-2) with (0) and without (0) bentonite. C. Viral RNA subunit profile after incubation at 37’ in the presence of AMV DNA polymerase (preparation V74-17) with (0) and without (0) bentonite.
951
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
TABLE
RNA AMV
I.
AMV
BIOCHEMICAL
solubilization and enzymatic DNA polymerase preparations.
DNA polymerase preparation
percent enzymatic DNA
v74-
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
V75-2
in
of control activitya
polymerase
17
activities
percent RNase
solubilization of RNAb
H
93%
82%
13%
78%
63%
0%
a
DNA polymerase and RNase H activities were determined as described in the Materials and Methods in the presence of 32 pg/ml bentonite and compared to control activities in reactions lacking bentonite. b3 [: HI-labeled ribosomal 28s RNA was exposed to the enzyme preparations for 1 hr at 37’C. The acid-insoluble material remaining was compared to that in control incubation mixtures lacking enzyme.
these are
conditions only
of incubation,
slightly
In an effort degradation, were
greater
resolution
when
polymerase 32 pg/ml profile
RNA
was
(preparation with
was
V75-2).
the enzyme,
detectable
from
acids
though
employed
incubated
RNase
H activity
of limited
described
gels,
than
sedimentation.
rate-zonal
was
(Table
I),
in the presence However,
when
no solubilization extensive
RNA
3
which As
of RNA degradation
of the purified
AMV
bentonite
included
difference
of the control
RNA
in Figure
polyacrylamide
there
no significant that
and
the detection
as those
in 2.25%
even
periods
for
mixtures
of nucleic
4B,
the incubation
resulted
the sensitivity
incubation
in Figure
DNA polymerase
I).
by electrophoresis
can be seen during
(Table
to increase
similar
analyzed
affords
inhibited
both
was
in the RNA
lacking
DNA
DNA at
electrophoretic
polymerase
(Figure
4A, C). DISCUSSION The
RNA-directed
DNA
polymerase
of oncornaviruses
952
has been
purified
Vol.
67, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1975
AND
DISTANCE
Figure 4. electrophoresis. in Figure precipitated buffer
of
ribonuclease
of
the
3.
Tris:HCl, in 100
of
pH 7.4, ~1 TE buffer
techniques.
(mm)
DNA
polymerase RNA at
low
appear
concentrations
gel described were in TE
EDTA). heated to 100” for 60 seconds, quenched, gels of 2.25% polyacrylamide, in 6 x 126) mm [ PI-labeled 28s and 18s ribosomal The incubation conditions were as follows: 1 hr at 37’. and AMV DNA and
to
AMV of 32
remain
(nicking) in
DNA kg/ml
when
polymerase
(preparation
V75-2),
polymerase bentonite.
(preparation
V75-2),
rigorously in
In this
(1,4,9). degrading
as
0. OlM were
However,
activity
contaminating bentonite
COMMUNICATIONS
of the viral RNA subunit integrity by polyacrylamide Reactions (50 PI) were carried out for 1 hr at 37’ After Pronase digestion and phenol extraction, mixtures with ethanol, centritiged and the precipitates resuspended
and analyzed by electrophoresis GmA/geI, 4 hr at room temperature. RNAs were included as markers. A. [3H]-Iabeled viral RNA, [3H]-labeIed viral RNA B. 1 hr at 37’. C. C3H]-labeled viral RNA 1 hr at 37’ in the presence
a variety
MIGRATED
RESEARCH
Analysis
(0. 2M Samples
by
BIOPHYSICAL
even
assayed, highly
communication activity
incubation
may mixtures.
purified we
be
trace
preparations
report
eliminated Under
amounts
these
that
this
by
including conditions
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
the
DNA
only
BIOCHEMICAL
polymerase
minimally
ducted
in
and inhibited.
the
the
H activities
Thus,
complete
investigating reaction
RNase
absence
out
in
the
the
presence
enzyme
preparation
synthesis
degradation. avian
of
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
DNA
of template of
the
of
RNA-directed
characteristics
carried
AND BIOPHYSICAL
are
may
We
are
RNA-directed
be
con-
currently
DNA
polymerase
bentonite.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Grant
This No.
investigation CA 14790-01
was supported by from the National
Public Cancer
Health Service Institute.
Research
REFERENCES 1.
Faras,
A. J., Taylor, J. M., J. M. (1972) Biochemistry
2.
Kacian,D. L., Biophys.
3.
Grandgenett, Sci.
D., U. S. A.
Gerard, G. S., 70, 230-234.
4.
Hurwitz,
J.,
Leis,
5.
Marcus,
Watson, Acta 246,
and
S.
L.,
McDonnell, J., 11, 2334-2342.
K. F., 265-383.
J. P.
Modak,
M.
A.,
Burny,
and
and
J.
and
Cavalieri,
W.
Spiegehan,
Green,
(1972)
J.,
Levinson,
M.
Viral.
(1973)
9,
E.,
and
S.
(1971)
Proc.
Bishop,
Biochim.
Nat.
Acad.
Viral.
14,
116-129.
L. F.
(1974)
J.
853-859. 6.
Livingston, Virology
7.
Gerwin, 69,
8.
Green, 14,
9.
Temin, IO,21
IO.
Faras,
D. M. 50,
, Parks, 388-395.
B. I., and 2599-2603. end M., 187-334. H. M., l-235,
Milstein,
and
Faras,
A. J., 859-863.
12.
Collett,
M. 436-445.
S.,
and
G. F.
Mizutani,
A. Viral.
Dibble,
Kieras,
P. , Scolnick,
(1974)
(1974)
12,
Levinson, 334-342.
N. A.
R. M.,
(1975)
and
Proc.
Prog.
S.
C.,
E. M.
(1972)
J. B.
Gerard,
A. J. , Garapin, H. M. (1973) J,
11.
W.
Faras,
954
in
, and
Nat.
Nucl.
The
W.
E.,
Proc.
Acad.
Acid
Enzymes
J.
Acad.
(1975)
(1972)
Sci.
Res.
(ed.
Bishop,
Nat.
A. J.
Ross,
J. M.,
Sci.
Virology
U. S. A.
Mol.
Biol.
P. D.
Boyer),
and
Goodman,
U. S. A.
65,
72,
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
13.
Levinson, J., Jackson, J.
Bishop, and
14.
Kacian, L.
15.
Collett,
16.
Garapin,
D. L., Grossman M.
Wang,
18.
Garrett,
19.
Fraenkel-Conrat,
20.
Barlow,
22.
Keller,
23.
Molling,
Verma,
J.
D. P.,
J.
(1973)
J.
and
Pitot,
B.,
and
A. P. (1966) and Davies,
Gerard,
G. F.,
D.,
Viral.
16,
W., 589-598. Viral.
12,
H. C.
in Procedures D. R.) pp.
Green,
N.,
Fanshier,
Analyt.
Biochem.
Virology
in 444-454.
Nucleic
(1973)
J.
14, Acid
Harper
Viral.
Res. and
10,
142. Crouch,
K., Bolognesi, Hausen, P. I.M.
(1975)
R.
(1971) J.
(1972)
Proc.
Nat.
Acad.
D. P., Bauer, H., Busen, W., Nature N. B. 234, 240-243. Viral.
15,
121-126.
955
L.,
1512-1521.
(1961)
M,
(eds., New York.
000-000.
(1973)
A.
L.,
Enzymology Press,
Quintrell,
Tsugita,
and
Fanshier,
in Methods in 150-173, Academic
P., Levinson, J. Viral. 6,
D. S.,
L.,
(1973)
(1975)
P. H.
, and Mathias, G. , Cantoni, New York.
W. , and 3360-3364.
and
McDonnell, J. M. (1970)
Singer,
Sullivan, 112-195.
29E,
A. J.
Wilkinson,
N., 42,
S.
Faras,
H.,
Grandgenett, 1136-l
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Quintrell, Virology
Duesberg,
C. T., 342-348.
J. (eds. Row,
24.
and
W., (1970)
Spiegelman, and K. Moldave)
S. , and
L.,
52,
21.
and
A. C., Bishop,
and 17.
BIOCHEMICAL
Sci.
U. S. A.
Plassmann,
69,
H-W.,
54-58.