Elucidating the effects of disease-causing mutations on STAT3 function in autosomal-dominant hyper-IgE syndrome

Elucidating the effects of disease-causing mutations on STAT3 function in autosomal-dominant hyper-IgE syndrome

Accepted Manuscript Elucidating the effects of disease-causing mutations on STAT3 function in autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome Simon J. Pelham, M...

1MB Sizes 2 Downloads 104 Views

Accepted Manuscript Elucidating the effects of disease-causing mutations on STAT3 function in autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome Simon J. Pelham, MSc, Helen Lenthall, B Sc Hons, Elissa K. Deenick, PhD, Stuart G. Tangye, PhD PII:

S0091-6749(16)30282-2

DOI:

10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.020

Reference:

YMAI 12119

To appear in:

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Received Date: 30 November 2015 Revised Date:

24 March 2016

Accepted Date: 5 April 2016

Please cite this article as: Pelham SJ, Lenthall H, Deenick EK, Tangye SG, Elucidating the effects of disease-causing mutations on STAT3 function in autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.020. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Elucidating the effects of disease-causing mutations on STAT3 function in autosomal

2

dominant hyper-IgE syndrome

3

Simon J Pelham MSc1,2,

4

Helen Lenthall B Sc Hons2,

5

Elissa K Deenick PhD1,2,

6

Stuart G Tangye PhD1,2

7 8 9

RI PT

1

1

Immunology Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia;

2

St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales Australia, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia

10 11 Corresponding authors

13

Dr. Stuart Tangye; Dr Elissa Deenick

14

Garvan Institute of Medical Research

15

384 Victoria St. Darlinghurst. 2010. NSW. Australia

16

e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

M AN U

SC

12

17

This work was supported by project and program grants awarded by the National Health and

19

Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (1016953, 1066694, and 1027400 to E.K.

20

Deenick and S.G. Tangye). S.J.P. is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award from the

21

University of New South Wales. S.G. Tangye is a recipient of a Principal Research Fellowship

22

(1042925) from the NHMRC of Australia.

25 26

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

EP

24

AC C

23

TE D

18

Page 1 of 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

27

Key words

28

• autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome; STAT3; transcription factors; cytokine signaling

29 Abbreviations

31

AD-HIES: autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome; DN: dominant negative; JAK: Janus

32

activating kinase; STAT: signal transducer and activation of transcription; SH2: Src homology

33

2; DNA BD: DNA binding domain; TA: transactivation; EBV-LCL: EBV-transformed

34

lymphoblastoid cell line; WT: wild-type

RI PT

30

35 Capsule summary

37

Analysis of germline mutations in STAT3 that cause AD-HIES revealed biochemical

38

mechanisms of disease-causation. This has implications for developing therapeutics that

39

could modulate the function of STAT3 in the settings of immunodeficiency, autoimmunity and

40

malignancy.

M AN U

SC

36

41

AC C

EP

TE D

42 43

Page 2 of 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

To the editor

45

Signaling through STAT3 is an important process required for the function of a wide range of

46

biological systems. This is demonstrated by embryonic lethality of germline Stat3 gene-

47

targeted mice1. Furthermore, heterozygous dominant negative (DN) mutations in STAT3

48

cause autosomal dominant hyper IgE syndrome (AD-HIES) in humans, a disease

49

characterized by increased susceptibility to infection with Staphylococcus aureus,

50

Streptococcus pneumonia and Candida albicans, eczema, extremely elevated levels of serum

51

IgE, poor humoral immune responses, and non-immunological features including defects in

52

musculoskeletal, dental, and vascular systems.2,

53

been reported that affect all functional domains of STAT3.3,

54

cytosolic transcription factor with a key role in signaling downstream of numerous cytokines,

55

including IL-6, IL-10, IL-21 and IL-232. DN STAT3 mutations cause multiple cellular defects,

56

including reduced Th17 cells, memory B cells, T follicular helper cells and MAIT cells, and

57

impairing responsiveness of naïve B cells to IL-10 and IL-21 (Online Supplemental data Table

58

1)2,

59

production in AD-HIES. Despite this, our understanding of the molecular impact of various

60

STAT3 mutations remains limited. Indeed, as there is no genotype/phenotype relationship7, it

61

remains to be determined how diverse mutations impair STAT3 signaling to manifest the

62

same clinical and cellular phenotype. Furthermore, while several studies have examined the

63

effects of mutations in separate domains of STAT3 on signaling pathways8-10, few have

64

systematically compared the impact of mutations located in different functional domains of

65

STAT3.

More than 60 different mutations have STAT3 encodes a latent

M AN U

SC

4

3, 5, 6

TE D

. These defects explain susceptibility to fungal infections and poor antibody

EP

66

3

RI PT

44

To explore this, we examined the consequences of distinct disease-causing mutations in the

68

DNA binding, SH2 and transactivation domains on each stage of STAT3 signaling. We

69

selected 6 mutations previously identified in numerous cohorts of AD-HIES patients, including

70

our own, that localize to the DNA binding domain (BD) (R382W, H437P, S465F), SH2 domain

71

(Q644P, Y657N) or TA (L706M) domains5, 6 (Figure 1A; Fig S1A Online supplemental data).

72

All mutations have a comparable deleterious effect on the generation of Th17, Tfh and

73

memory B cells in affected individuals (Online Supplemental data Table S1). To test how

74

each mutation affected tyrosine phosphorylation, HEK-293T cells were transfected with

75

plasmids encoding WT or mutant STAT3 (Figure 1B, Fig S1B). IL-6 stimulation induced

76

phosphorylation at tyrosine 705 (Y705) of WT STAT3 as well as STAT3 harboring mutations

77

in the DNA BD, as well as the Q644P SH2 domain mutant (Figure 1B, Fig S1B). In contrast,

78

the SH2 domain Y657N and TA domain L706M mutants failed to undergo significant

79

phosphorylation in response to IL-6 (Figure 1B, Fig S1B). Reduced STAT3 phosphorylation

AC C

67

Page 3 of 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

80

due to Y657N SH2 and L706M TA domain mutants likely results from conformational

81

alterations of STAT3 or steric hindrance that limit access of kinases to phosphorylate Y705.

82

Thus, only mutations in the proximity of Y705 (Figure 1A) affected STAT3 phosphorylation.

83 Following phosphorylation, STAT3 forms dimers that are required for function11, 12. To test the

85

ability of mutant STAT3 to form dimers with WT STAT3, and to recapitulate the setting of

86

heterozygous STAT3 mutations in AD-HIES, HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with Myc-

87

tagged WT and Flag-tagged mutant STAT3 plasmids (Figure 1C), and then stimulated with IL-

88

6. STAT3 multimers were captured by co-immunoprecipitation using anti-Flag mAb. The

89

levels of dimer formation between WT STAT3 and those with mutations in the DNA BD or TA

90

domain were comparable to WT/WT STAT3 proteins (Figure 1C, D). This is consistent with

91

initial observations by Minegishi et al.10 who reported that mutations in the DNA BD did not

92

affect STAT3 dimerization. In contrast to DNA BD mutations, SH2 domain mutations reduced

93

dimer formation by ~40-50%, with Y657N having the greatest effect (Figure 1C,D). This

94

identifies these residues as being critical for intermolecular interactions between

95

phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3). It is likely that amino acid substitutions in the SH2 domain

96

result in changes in charge, which affect assembly or stability of STAT3 dimers.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

84

97 98

Nuclear translocation of STAT3 is crucial for its role as a transcription factor11,

12

99

investigate the impact of mutations in STAT3 on its nuclear translocation, nuclear extracts

100

were prepared from IL-21-stimulated WT and STAT3 mutant EBV-LCLs and the levels of

101

pSTAT3 determined. The accumulation of nuclear pSTAT3 in normal EBV-LCLs was maximal

102

after 15 mins and declined at times thereafter (Figure 2A). Consistent with reductions in total

103

pSTAT3 in transfected HEK-293T cells (Figure 1B; Fig S1B), the Y657N SH2 and L706M TA

104

domain mutations resulted in significant reductions in levels of nuclear pSTAT3 in EBV-LCLs

105

(Figure 2A). Remarkably, two of the three DNA BD mutations (R382W, H437P) significantly

106

reduced nuclear translocation of pSTAT3 (Figure 2A). As several nuclear export sequences

107

have been identified in the DNA BD of STAT313, reduced translocation due to these mutations

108

this likely results from an imbalance between nuclear import and export. Interestingly, the

109

S465F DNA BD mutation had no effect on nuclear pSTAT3 translocation (Figure 2A).

AC C

EP

TE D

. To

110 111

Once in the nucleus STAT3 binds specific target sites to regulate gene transcription.11, 12 WT

112

STAT3 exhibited strong binding to a canonical target sequence that was maximal after 15-30

113

mins of IL-21 stimulation (Figure 2B). Conversely, all STAT3 mutant proteins showed

114

significant decreases in their ability to bind DNA (Figure 2B). As some STAT3 mutations

115

affected phosphorylation (Y657N, L706M) or nuclear translocation (R382W, H437P), the Page 4 of 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

reduction in DNA binding reflects not only an impaired ability of mutant STAT3 to bind target

117

sequences but also decreases in the amount of pSTAT3 in the nucleus. Consistent with these

118

findings, induction of the STAT3 target genes SOCS3 (Figure 2C), PRDM1 (encoding BLIMP-

119

1) and IL2RA (Fig S2A, B) were significantly reduced (50-90%) in response to IL-21 and IL-10

120

in STAT3 mutant compared to normal EBV-LCLs, thereby indicating that the defect in DNA

121

binding results in a functional impairment in the ability to induce gene transcription. Thus,

122

impaired DNA binding of mutant STAT3 proteins manifests as reduced gene transcription.

RI PT

116

123

In conclusion our study gives insight into dysfunctional STAT3-dependent signaling in AD-

125

HIES, and allowed for the dissection and identification of specific stages of STAT3 signaling

126

affected by these disease-causing mutations (Fig S3; Table S1). This not only highlights

127

which aspects of STAT3 signaling are impacted by these mutations but also identifies

128

residues and regions of domains in STAT3 that are critical for normal function (Fig S3; Table

129

S1). This reveals mechanisms not only for loss-of function of STAT3 in AD-HIES but reveals

130

residues/regions of STAT3 that could be targeted in cases where STAT3 is overactive, such

131

as gain-of function mutations in STAT3 resulting in multisystemic autoimmunity or

132

hematological malignancies, respectively3.

M AN U

SC

124

Simon J Pelham MSc1,2,

135

Helen Lenthall B Sc Hons2,

136

Elissa K Deenick PhD1,2,

137

Stuart G Tangye PhD1,2

140 141 142 143 144 145

1

Immunology Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia;

2

St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales Australia, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia

AC C

138 139

EP

134

TE D

133

Page 5 of 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure Legends

147

Figure 1. Autosomal dominant hyper IgE syndrome-causing STAT3 mutations: effects

148

on phosphorylation and dimerisation.

149

(A) Schematic representation of STAT3, with the mutations studied indicated by black lines.

150

(B) HEK-293T cells were transfected with Flag-tagged WT or R382W, H437P, S465F,

151

Q644P, Y657N or L706M mutant STAT3, and either untreated or stimulated with IL-6 (30

152

mins). Phosphorylation of STAT3 (pSTAT3) was determined by fixing and permeabilising the

153

cells and labeling with Abs specific for Flag and pSTAT3 (Y705). Graph shows geometric MFI

154

of pSTAT3 (Two way ANOVA with Dunnett post-test, comparison between IL-6 stimulated WT

155

and mutant STAT3. ***p< 0.001. mean ± SEM, n=6). (C, D) HEK-293T cells were co-

156

transfected with plasmids containing Myc-tagged WT STAT3 and either Flag-tagged WT or

157

mutant STAT3. After 48 hours, cells were harvested, rested for 2 hours then stimulated with

158

IL-6 (10 ng/ml, 30 mins). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag Ab, and

159

assessed for the presence of Myc-tagged WT or mutant STAT3 by Western blotting. (C)

160

Diagram of the gel lanes (upper); Input whole cell lysates immunoblotted for Myc, Flag or

161

GAPDH showing equivalent amounts of WT and mutant STAT3 (left; lower) and

162

immunopreciptiation of lysates with anti-Flag beads, immunoblotted for Myc and Flag (right;

163

lower). (D) Quantification of ratio of WT:mutant STAT3, normalized to WT:mutant ratio of the

164

input. (One way ANOVA with Dunnett post-test, comparison between WT and various

165

mutants. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. mean ± SEM, n=5).

166

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

146

Figure 2. Impaired nuclear translocation, DNA binding and gene induction by mutant

168

STAT3 proteins.

169

(A, B) EBV-LCLs from normal donors or AD-HIES patients were stimulated with IL-21 for 0,

170

15, 30 or 60 minutes, and nuclear fractions then isolated. (A) The abundance of pSTAT3 was

171

assessed by determining the ratio of intensity of mutant vs WT pSTAT3 stimulated with IL-21

172

for 15 minutes. (Two way ANOVA with Dunnett post-test, comparison between 15 minute time

173

points, ***p<0.001, **p< 0.01, *p< 0.05. mean ± SEM, n=4). (B) Binding of WT and mutant

174

STAT3 to consensus DNA binding sites was determined (TransAM kit, ActiveMotif). Values

175

were normalized to WT STAT3 at 15 mins. (Two way ANOVA with Dunnett post-test,

176

comparison between 15 minute time points, ***p< 0.001, **p< 0.01, *p< 0.05. mean ± SEM ,

177

n=3-4). The dashed line represents the basal response (i.e. time 0) of WT EBV LCLs to

178

cytokine stimulation. (C) EBV-LCLs from normal donors or AD-HIES patients were stimulated

179

with IL-21 or media only for 3 hours. Expression levels of SOCS3 were determined by qPCR.

180

(Two way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-test, comparison between IL-21 stimulated (SOCS3)

181

samples, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. mean ± SEM, n=5-9).

AC C

EP

167

Page 6 of 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

182 Supplemental Online data

184

Figure S1: Autosomal dominant hyper IgE syndrome-causing STAT3 mutations and

185

effects on cytokine-induced phosphorylation

186

(A) Crystallographic structure of a STAT3 dimer bound to DNA (Protein Data Bank, 1BG1).

187

Sites of the mutations are represented by red spheres, phosphorylated tyrosine 705 (Y705) is

188

indicated by black spheres.

189

(B) HEK-293T cells were transfected with Flag-tagged WT STAT3 or STAT3 harbouring the

190

following mutations: R382W, H437P, S465F, Q644P, Y657N or L706M. Cells were left

191

untreated or stimulated with IL-6 for 30 mins. Phosphorylation of STAT3 was determined by

192

flow cytometry following fixing and permeabilising the cells and labeling with Abs specific for

193

Flag and pSTAT3 (Y705). Representative histograms of phosphorylated STAT3 induction

194

after IL-6 stimulation.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

183

195

Figure S2: Effect of STAT3 loss-of function mutations on induction of expression of

197

target genes.

198

EBV-LCLs from normal donors or AD-HIES patients were unstimulated or stimulated with IL-

199

10 (A, B), IL-21 (C) for 3 hours. Expression of PRDM1 and IL2RA was then determined by

200

qPCR (Two way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-test, comparison between treated and

201

untreated (PRDM1 and IL2RA), *P < 0.05. mean ± SEM, n=5-9)

TE D

196

202

Figure S3: Summary of the proximal stage of signaling disrupted by various AD-HIES

204

STAT3 mutations. A diagram showing the stages of signaling affected by each STAT3

205

mutation. IL-21 bound to IL-21R (Protein Data Bank, 3TXG) used as an example of a STAT3

206

signaling cytokine receptor. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 705 (pY705) is represented in the

207

STAT3 structure with black spheres (Protein Data Bank, 1BG1). Orange box surrounding the

208

mutation indicates TA domain, yellow box indicates SH2 domain and green box indicates

209

DNA binding domain.

AC C

210

EP

203

211

Page 7 of 8

212

References

213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244

1.

8.

9. 10. 11. 12. 13.

RI PT

7.

SC

6.

M AN U

5.

TE D

4.

EP

3.

Takeda K, Noguchi K, Shi W, Tanaka T, Matsumoto M, Yoshida N, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997; 94:3801-4. Kane A, Deenick EK, Ma CS, Cook MC, Uzel G, Tangye SG. STAT3 is a central regulator of lymphocyte differentiation and function. Current Opinion in Immunology 2014; 28:49-57. Vogel TP, Milner JD, Cooper MA. The Ying and Yang of STAT3 in Human Disease. J Clin Immunol 2015; 35:615-23. Woellner C, Gertz EM, Schaffer AA, Lagos M, Perro M, Glocker EO, et al. Mutations in STAT3 and diagnostic guidelines for hyper-IgE syndrome. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2010; 125:424-32. Avery DT, Deenick EK, Ma CS, Suryani S, Simpson N, Chew GY, et al. B cell-intrinsic signaling through IL-21 receptor and STAT3 is required for establishing long-lived antibody responses in humans. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2010; 207:155-71. Ma CS, Chew GY, Simpson N, Priyadarshi A, Wong M, Grimbacher B, et al. Deficiency of Th17 cells in hyper IgE syndrome due to mutations in STAT3. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2008; 205:1551-7. Heimall J, Davis J, Shaw PA, Hsu AP, Gu W, Welch P, et al. Paucity of genotype-phenotype correlations in STAT3 mutation positive Hyper IgE Syndrome (HIES). Clin Immunol 2011; 139:75-84. Giacomelli M, Tamassia N, Moratto D, Bertolini P, Ricci G, Bertulli C, et al. SH2-domain mutations in STAT3 in hyper-IgE syndrome patients result in impairment of IL-10 function. Eur J Immunol 2011; 41:3075-84. He J, Shi J, Xu X, Zhang W, Wang Y, Chen X, et al. STAT3 mutations correlated with hyper-IgE syndrome lead to blockage of IL-6/STAT3 signalling pathway. J Biosci 2012; 37:243-57. Minegishi Y, Saito M, Tsuchiya S, Tsuge I, Takada H, Hara T, et al. Dominant-negative mutations in the DNA-binding domain of STAT3 cause hyper-IgE syndrome. Nature 2007; 448:1058-62. Shuai K, Liu B. Regulation of JAK-STAT signalling in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3:900-11. Levy DE, Darnell JE, Jr. Stats: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:651-62. Bhattacharya S, Schindler C. Regulation of Stat3 nuclear export. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2003; 111:553-9.

AC C

2.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Page 8 of 8

Figure 1

130

A

N Terminal

320 Coiled coil

465

DNA binding

Linker

688

SH2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT R382W

B

585

H437P S465F

TA

Q644P L706M Y657N

1000

*** 500

+

WT

-

+

-

R382W

+

H437P

-

+

S465F

Myc-tagged

1

2

3

4

-

-

WT

WT

Flag-tagged -

WT

-

+

-

Q644P

+

Y657N

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

WT

WT

WT

WT

IB: Anti Flag

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

1.25

Ratio WT/Mutant

1.00

0.75

*

**

Q644P

Y657N

0.50

0.25

0.00 WT

R382W

10

WT

WT

H437P

DNA BD

TA

IP: Anti-Flag

AC C

IB: Anti GAPDH

6

9

SH2

EP

IB: Anti Myc

5

L706M

WT R382W H437P S465F Q644P Y657N L706M

TE D

1

+

TA

DNA BD

Input

-

SH2

M AN U

DNA BD

C

-

SC

-

IL-6

***

RI PT

geometric MFI

1500

0

D

770

S465F

SH2

L706M

TA

6

7

8

9

10

Figure 2

A

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Nuclear Fraction WT

R382W

H437P

S465F

WT

Y675N

L706M

pSTAT3

Histone H3 GAPDH 15

30

60

0

15

30

60

0

15

30

60

0

15

30

60

0

15

30

1.50 1.25 1.00

SC

***

****

0.50 0.25 0.00 Control

R382W

H437P

S465F

DNA BD 1.25

TE D

*

***

0.75

0.50

AC C

0.25

WT

**

****

R382W

H437P

S465F

Y657N

L706M

SH2

TA

40

SOCS3 Expression Arbitrary Units

Minutes

***

DNA BD

C

0 15 30 60

EP

DNA binding (relative OD)

1.00

0.00

15

30

60

0

15

30

30

*

20

*

**

**

**

10 0 IL-21

-

+

WT

-

+

-

+

R382W H437P

DNA BD

-

+

S465F

-

+

-

+

Y657N

L706M

SH2

TA

60

Minutes

***

0.75

B

0

0 15 30 60

M AN U

pSTAT3 (Relative Intensity)

1.75

60

RI PT

Minutes 0

****

Y657N

L706M

SH2

TA

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table S1: Effects of STAT3 mutations on the generation of effector lymphocytes and on STAT3 signaling and function

H437P 10

5.3

3.5

3.8

3.5

Biochemical feature of STAT3 signaling Phosphorylation Dimerisation Nuclear localization DNA binding Induction of target genes

R382W Normal Normal   

H437P Normal Normal   

RI PT

R382W 3.55

L706M 7.5

4.2

2.1

7.8

4.5

3.7

2.5

2.5

Q644P Normal  ND ND ND

Y657N     

L706M  Normal   

S465F Normal Normal Normal  

M AN U

Y657N 4

1.3

SC

Lymphocyte population/function Th17 cells (%CD45RO-CCR6+ CD4+ T cells); Reference values: 23.0 ± 8.7% (mean ± sd; n=68) % Memory B cells (%CD27+ CD20+ cells) Reference values: 27.5 ± 14.5% (mean ± sd; n=64) Tfh cells (%CD45RA-CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells) Reference values: 8.2 ± 3.3% (mean ± sd; n=72)

STAT3 mutation S465F Q644P 3.3 5.5

EP

TE D

The proportions of Th17 cells, memory B cells, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in the peripheral blood of individual(s) with each mutation were determined by flow cytometry. For the R382W and L706M mutations, the values represent the mean from analysis of several patients with the same mutation. For the H437P, Q644P and Y657N mutations the values represent the mean of repeated analyses on the same individual. Reference ranges were from our previously published studies1-4. The effect of each of the mutations tested on the distinct stages of the STAT3 signaling pathway is also indicated.

AC C

References 1. Avery DT, Deenick EK, Ma CS, Suryani S, Simpson N, Chew GY, et al. B cell-intrinsic signaling through IL-21 receptor and STAT3 is required for establishing long-lived antibody responses in humans. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2010; 207:155-71. 2. Deenick EK, Avery DT, Chan A, Berglund LJ, Ives ML, Moens L, et al. Naive and memory human B cells have distinct requirements for STAT3 activation to differentiate into antibody-secreting plasma cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2013; 210:2739-53. 3. Ma CS, Avery DT, Chan A, Batten M, Bustamante J, Boisson-Dupuis S, et al. Functional STAT3 deficiency compromises the generation of human T follicular helper cells. Blood 2012; 119:3997-4008. 4. Ma CS, Wong N, Rao G, Avery DT, Torpy J, Hambridge T, et al. Monogenic mutations differentially affect the quantity and quality of T follicular helper cells in patients with human primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 136:993-1006 e1.

Figure S1

A

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Y657

L706

phosphorylated Y705

Q644

RI PT

DNA

M AN U

SC

S465

H437

EP

R382W (DNA BD)

H437P (DNA BD)

S465F (DNA BD) Unstimulated Mutant + IL-6

AC C

B

TE D

R382

Q644P (SH2)

WT + IL-6

Y657N (SH2)

phosphorylated-STAT3

L706M (TA)

Figure S2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3

* ns

ns

-

-

ns

ns

ns

2

1

0 IL-10

-

+

WT

+

+

R382W H437P

-

+

S465F

DNA BD

B

-

+

-

+

Y657N

L706M

SH2

TA

SC

1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 IL-10

-

+

WT

-

+

-

+

R382W H437P

-

+

S465F

*

2.5

ns

2.0

-

+

L706M

SH2

TA

ns

ns

ns

EP

1.5

ns

1.0 0.5

AC C

PRDM1 Expression Fold Change

C

+

Y657N

TE D

DNA BD

-

M AN U

PRDM1 Expression Fold Change

2.0

0.0

IL-21

RI PT

IL2RA Expression Fold Change

A

-

+

WT

-

+

-

+

R382W H437P

DNA BD

-

+

S465F

-

+

-

+

Y657N

L706M

SH2

TA

Figure S3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RI PT

IL-21

Cytoplasm

Y657N

STAT3

M AN U

Y657N

SC

IL-21R

L706M pY705

Nucleus DNA

AC C

EP

TE D

Q644P

H437P

R382W

S465F