Endoleak Three Years After Conventional Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endoleak Three Years After Conventional Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

EJVES Extra 3, 67–69 (2002) doi:10.1053/ejvx.2002.0107, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on SHORT REPORT Endoleak Three Years After Co...

123KB Sizes 2 Downloads 147 Views

EJVES Extra 3, 67–69 (2002) doi:10.1053/ejvx.2002.0107, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on

SHORT REPORT

Endoleak Three Years After Conventional Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair D. A. Lacquiere and A. E. P. Cameron∗ Department of Surgery, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, U.K. Key Words: Endoleak; Open; Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Introduction Endovascular repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (EVAR) may eliminate much of the early cardiovascular and pulmonary risk associated with open repair, but the long-term efficacy of this technique is debatable. In up to 44% of cases1 it may be complicated by an endoleak – leakage of blood outside the endoluminally placed graft, but contained within the aneurysm sac. Conversely, open repair may be associated with early cardiac and respiratory complications in almost 20% of cases,2 but latent inappropriate reperfusion of the aneurysm sac had until recently, never been documented. However in 2000 Chan et al.3 described six patients who developed such leaks, and suggested that endoleak be considered a complication of open repair in patients presenting as late as 18 months. We report a case in which a leak was detected 3 years after conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

infrarenal AAA, using a 20 mm diameter straight dacron graft. On examination she was cardiovascularly stable, and had epigastric tenderness but no palpable mass. An ultrasound scan showed an 8-cm diameter hypoechoic region in the upper abdomen (Fig. 1). An urgent contrast-enhanced CT scan revealed an 8.5 cm diameter sac lying to the left side of the upper abdominal aorta, and communicating with it (Fig. 2). The patient remained cardiovascularly stable, but in view of the size of the aneurysm it was decided to explore the graft by open operation. At laparotomy there was an expansile vascular swelling which had the appearance of a primary infrarenal AAA; the original graft was not visible. After control of the iliac arteries a supra-coeliac clamp was applied. On opening the sac a jet of blood was seen emanating from the left side of the proximal end of the abdominal aorta. Further exploration revealed a small gap in the proximal anastomosis; bleeding had occurred from here and had filled the old aneurysm sac. The defect was oversewn and the sac closed. The patient made an uneventful recovery.

Case Report A 70-year-old female presented with epigastric pain and tenderness. Thirty-five months previously she had undergone an emergency open repair of a ruptured

∗ Please address all correspondence to: A. E. P. Cameron, Surgical Department, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, U.K.

Discussion This case lends credence to Chan et al.’s suggestions that technical factors such as loose sutures may lead to the development of endoleak following open AAA repair, and that contrast-enhanced CT is an appropriate diagnostic tool for large leaks. Moreover, we propose that it is important to consider endoleak as a possible complication of open AAA repair as late as 3 years

1533–3167/02/000000+00 $35.00/0  2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd

68

D. A. Lacquiere and A. E. P. Cameron

Fig. 1. Ultrasound scan of the upper abdomen showing a hypoechoic area, 8 cm in maximum diameter.

Fig. 2. CT scan demonstrating leakage of contrast from the abdominal aorta into an 8.5 cm diameter aneurysm sac (arrow).

EJVES Extra, 2002

Endoleak After Conventional Open AAA Repair

post-surgery, and that indications for surgical intervention should be based on extrapolation from conventional teaching on primary AAAs. Thus the presence of abdominal or back pain together with radiographic evidence of an endoleak producing an aneurysm greater than 5.5 cm diameter should prompt urgent surgical repair, thereby avoiding rupture with its attendant operative mortality of 50%. The incidence of symptomatic endoleaks following open repair is manifestly low but the overall prevalence is unknown – as many as 50% of endoleaks following EVAR seal spontaneously4 and it is not unreasonable to assume that the same phenomenon occurs following open repair. Furthermore as the reported incidence of primary AAA continues to rise5 and with heightened clinical suspicion of endoleaks following open repair, this complication may assume more clinical significance. Thus there is perhaps a case

69

for prospective long-term follow-up after open AAA repair, with regular measurement of aneurysm diameter and/or radiographic detection of endoleak.

References 1 Moore WS, Rutherford RB. Transfemoral endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of the North American EVT phase 1 trial. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23: 543–553. 2 Akkersdijk GJM, Van der Graaf Y, Moll FL et al. Complications of standard elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15: 505–510. 3 Chan CLH, Ray SA, Taylor PR, Fraser SCA, Giddings AEB. Endoleaks following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 313–317. 4 Matsumura JS, Moore WS. Clinical consequences of peri-prosthetic leak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27: 606–613. 5 Fowkes FGR, MacIntyre GAA, Ruckley CV. Increasing incidence of aortic aneurysm in England and Wales. Br Med J 1989; 298: 397–401.

EJVES Extra, 2002