Energy-saving railway systems based on superconducting power transmission

Energy-saving railway systems based on superconducting power transmission

Accepted Manuscript Energy-saving railway systems based on superconducting power transmission Masaru Tomita, Kenji Suzuki, Yusuke Fukumoto, Atsushi Is...

5MB Sizes 1 Downloads 64 Views

Accepted Manuscript Energy-saving railway systems based on superconducting power transmission Masaru Tomita, Kenji Suzuki, Yusuke Fukumoto, Atsushi Ishihara, Tomoyuki Akasaka, Yusuke Kobayashi PII:

S0360-5442(17)30106-8

DOI:

10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.099

Reference:

EGY 10234

To appear in:

Energy

Received Date: 9 September 2016 Revised Date:

17 January 2017

Accepted Date: 19 January 2017

Please cite this article as: Tomita M, Suzuki K, Fukumoto Y, Ishihara A, Akasaka T, Kobayashi Y, Energy-saving railway systems based on superconducting power transmission, Energy (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.099. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

ACCEPTED Railway MANUSCRIPT Energy-Saving Systems

2

based on Superconducting Power Transmission

3

Masaru Tomitaa,1, Kenji Suzukib, Yusuke Fukumotob, Atsushi Ishiharab, Tomoyuki Akasakab, Yusuke

5

Kobayashib

RI PT

4

6

7

a

8

Promotion Division, Railway Technical Research Institute;

9

b

Applied Superconductivity Laboratory, Materials Technology Division, Railway Technical Research

Institute;

11

Correspondence to [email protected]

13

14

Abstract

TE D

1

EP

12

SC

M AN U

10

Applied Superconductivity Laboratory, Materials Technology Division and Research & Development

The new railway transmission feeder systems using superconducting materials was proposed.

16

With energy issues becoming increasingly important in this century, it is important to assess the

17

situation in the transportation sector. In recent years, direct current (DC) systems has been

18

progressing mainly in urban areas. Developing superconducting cable for railway power transmission

19

should lead to increased regeneration efficiency, reduced power loss, equalization of load between

20

substations, and fewer substations due to the smaller voltage drop. In order to verify to be formed as a

21

system, it’s needed to evaluate the circulation cooling, electrical current, cooling stress, laying through

AC C

15

typical line and electrical test of notch operation. The superconducting feeder system was set up along ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

23

the test track and conducted running tests, and then verified the system on a commercial line for the

24

first time in the world. As the results of energy analysis, it can be 5% energy saving system on average

25

rail line model. When it's converted into CO2 amount of emission, it'll be reduction in 3.6× ×105

26

ton-CO2/year in the world. As railway lines continue to be built to meet the increasing demand for

27

transport in line, the superconducting feeder system can be the solution to today’s electric energy

28

issues.

SC

RI PT

22

30

31

M AN U

29

Keywords : high temperature superconductivity; electric train; power transmission; feeder; direct current; energy analysis

33

1. Introduction

TE D

32

Railway transportation is safety, convenience, economy and environmental friendliness [1]. And they make

35

it increasingly important in this century for the rational and efficient use of energy [2]. A comparison of

36

energy efficiency between various means of transportation shows that, in the passenger transport sector,

37

railways consume only 7% of the energy despite carrying 30% of passengers. In both the passenger and

38

cargo sectors, energy consumption can be greatly reduced by changing the means of transport from trucks

39

and other road vehicles to railways, so it is necessary to encourage a shift from road vehicles to railways [3].

40

In such a case, the entire railway transportation system should be made more energy efficient [4]. Aiming to

41

energy conservation, various research are recently studied in railway [5]. And also, energy analysis in

42

railway are studied for energy saving [6]. Energy saving in railway largely effects to CO2 reduction [7].

AC C

EP

34

43

Western countries and Japan have highly developedMANUSCRIPT rail networks (Fig. 1a). ACCEPTED

About 5% of the electricity is

44

lost as it is transmitted along the rail line—a substantial loss of energy across the world’s rail networks.

45

While playing a key role in the railway sector, power transmission technology must be improved to reduce

46

energy losses [8].

47

in the rail systems in the early 20th century and this system is still used for most electrified sections on the

48

main lines. In recent years, conversion to DC systems, which require shorter insulation distances, has been

49

progressing mainly in urban areas.

50

capacity of several thousand amperes in the city center and several hundred amperes in the suburbs [9]. The

51

overhead contact line voltage in DC electrified sections on conventional rail lines is generally 600, 1500 or

52

3000V at which power losses and voltage drops start to occur when the distance between substations

53

exceeds 2 to 3 km [10]. Many DC electrified sections in Japan and Europe (Fig. 1b,c) [11] suffer from

54

these power loss and voltage drop issues. In US, subway also has power loss issue and France’s high-speed

55

TGV trains have similar issues while running on DC electrified sections in the suburbs. Superconducting

56

power transmission is needed to solve both of these issues and enhance train running stability. Accordingly,

57

a project was launched to develop technologies for reducing power transmission loss by using

58

superconducting cables for next-generation railway systems [12]. Fig. 2 shows flow model of electricity

59

from substations to trains on railways.

60

transmission lines, during which time transmission loss occurs because conventional cables have some

61

resistance. And, a voltage drop occurs when the distance between substations exceeds 2 to 3 km. Then, train

62

can’t accelerate because of power shortage.

63

enables us to solve the problems, such as transmission loss and a voltage drop, and to increase train

RI PT

In Europe and US, low-frequency alternating current (AC) transmission was introduced

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Rail system operation using DC power transmission requires a current

Electricity generated at substations is sent to trains through power

The introduction of the superconducting feeder cable system

schedules without the number of substations [13]. On electric trains, braking generates electricity, which is ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

65

then used by other trains; this is called regenerative braking. The electricity generated in this way by the

66

motor is transmitted through the overhead contact line to other trains running nearby. However, the energy

67

cannot be successfully transmitted if other trains are far away (a problem called cancelled regeneration). By

68

using superconducting cables as the feeding lines, electricity can be transmitted without loss to distant trains,

69

thus overcoming the problem of cancelled regeneration. The system can be made more energy efficient.

70

Furthermore, electricity generated at farther substations can be sent to trains through superconducting

71

cables, which makes the current load at each substation level.

72

simplified and the cost of substation’s equipment can be cut.

73

sent back to substations through rails and cables, in which case, leakage current corrodes underground pipes,

74

such as water pipe, gas pipe and so on.

75

above-mentioned problems and can effect large energy saving.

SC

RI PT

64

M AN U

As a result, the substation system can be

After being supplied to trains, electricity is

TE D

Introducing the superconducting feeder system can solve the

Following the discovery of high-temperature superconducting materials (e.g. La-Ba-Cu-O is discovered in

77

1986 [14]. Y-Ba-Cu-O is discovered in 1987 [15]. Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O is discovered in 1988 [16]),

78

superconducting technology is expected to play a key role in a wide range of applications related to high

79

magnetic fields [17]. And the technology is also applied for power transmission with zero electric resistance

80

[18]. Using rare-earth, a high-temperature superconducting bulk material, a high magnetic field of over 17 T

81

(Tesla) was attained [19], which corresponds to an extremely high current density.

AC C

EP

76

(1)

82

83

Bz : magnetic field value, µ0 : 4µ×10-7[Wb/A m],

J : current density, h : The distance from the sample surface, d : bulk diameter, t : bulk thickness. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

85

These superconducting materials correspond to 1.1×106 A/cm2 in current density. However, superconducting

86

material in bulk shape is strongly magnetized and so the actual current value is lower due to the

87

demagnetizing effect. This demagnetizing effect can be reduced by making the superconducting material

88

into a thin tape. This can be used to achieve more than 10kA DC transmission for railway transport [20]. A

89

project was started to develop a superconducting DC feeder cable to solve issues typically faced on DC

90

electrified sections.

SC

RI PT

84

92

M AN U

91

2. Methods

At first, a system was designed in which substations are partially connected with a superconducting feeder

94

cable, to solve the problem of a voltage drop between substations. Electricity generated at power stations is

95

sent to substations through power transmission lines as shown in Fig.3a.

96

substations are partially connected with a superconducting feeder cable. Partially connecting substations

97

with a superconducting feeder cable, it can effect energy-saving dependence on the superconducting cable

98

length in addition to the solution for the voltage drop.

Fig.3b shows a system in which

AC C

EP

TE D

93

99

In order to verify to be formed as a system, it was evaluated the circulation cooling, electrical current and

100

cooling stress, at first. Secondly, laying through typical line was evaluated. Thirdly, electrical test of notch

101

operation was verified. Table.1 shows the developed superconducting cables and the main verification

102

contents.

103

The cable was built around a center core. Layers of copper tape and layers of superconducting tape were

104

wrapped around the core and makeup the superconducting conductor. The superconducting tape was then

covered with a Kraft paper, which was used as anMANUSCRIPT electric insulation. Then, the wire was subsequently ACCEPTED

106

covered by a core protective layer which consists of the cloth tape and Kraft paper. Finally, the wire was

107

enclosed in a cryogenic pipe comprising double metallic pipes that provide vacuum insulation using

108

super-insulation [20].

RI PT

105

The superconducting feeder system were set up along the test track on our research institute (Fig. 3c). The

110

superconducting feeder cable system used in the test consisted of a superconducting feeder cable, current

111

terminals which is current outlet port to feeder, a cryocooler and a circulation pump which is circulated

112

refrigerant and liquid nitrogen was used as refrigerant.

M AN U

113

116

117

118

Using this superconducting feeder cable system, a train running test was conducted. And effect of saving energy was calculated on city rail line model.

TE D

115

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Verification of superconducting feeder cable system for the first time in the world

EP

114

SC

109

With the system set up on the site, the following tests were conducted to verify correct system operation: a

120

circulation cooling test in which the cryocooler and the circulation pump were used, and a current test by

121

power supply. In the cooling test, the distribution of mechanical stress on the entire system was studied.

122

When the superconducting cable is cooled, it shrinks because of thermal stress. Thermal stress was

123

evaluated aiming to introduce a long superconducting cable. Fig. 4 shows the X-ray image of a

124

superconducting cable before and after cooling.

125

moved and contact area of the inner cable with outer pipe became large, so heat intrusion to the cable grew

AC C

119

In case where the cable is fixed, the inner cable was

Therefore, if a longer cable are laid, it is required to ease the thermal stress, as is the case with the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

126

large.

127

offset part or the winding part. In the voltage endurance test, the system withstood voltage levels similar to

128

those used on existing rail lines. Following the verification test on the 31 meter cable system, a longer 310 meter superconducting feeder

130

cable system was set up on the test track. These cables were laid through some typical line conditions –

131

under the ground, under a viaduct and through a tight bend radius. And, take previous 31m cable cooling

132

into consideration, it provide offset part because of easing the thermal stress as shown in Fig.5a. These

133

verification tests showed that the superconducting feeder cable system satisfied the installation requirements

134

on general commercial lines (relating to circulation cooling of liquid nitrogen, voltage endurance, cooling

135

stress and routing). Using the superconducting feeder cable system, a running test was conducted with a

136

two-car test train on the test track, about 600 meter long (Fig. 5b).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

129

Following the confirmation of running stability on the test track, the superconducting cable system was

138

tested on a commercial line with a commercial train to verify the actual electrical circuit. This test was

139

conducted to verify whether the superconducting cable is usable in an actual electrical circuit using a

140

commercial three-car train. The system was installed on the side of the track at the railway’s stations, and

141

electricity from the substations was transmitted to the train via the 6 meter superconducting cable. Fig. 5d

142

shows the electrical circuit test result using commercial train. It was found that the current flows via the

143

superconducting cable according to the notch operation as shown in Fig. 5d. The three-car train achieved a

144

speed of about 70 km/h, the railway’s commercial speed, between four stations, 5.6 kilometer long. As the

145

train gained speed, the current reading increased (up to 880 A) (Fig. 5c). Thus, the test on a superconducting

146

feeder cable on a commercial rail line was successful. It was confirmed that it's formed as a electrical system

AC C

EP

TE D

137

147

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

through this verification test.

148

149

3.2. Energy analysis of superconducting feeder cable system Fig. 6 shows a system in which substations are completely connected via a superconducting feeder cable,

151

which reduced power loss, enhanced regeneration efficiency and evens out the electric load among

152

substations in addition to having the benefit of Fig. 3b as shown in Table.2.

153

when substations are completely connected via a superconducting feeder cable, analysis was conducted to

154

quantitatively evaluate the effect of superconducting feeder cable using model in which substations were

155

connected via a superconducting cable by laying it parallel to a feeder cable. The model route was 37.7 km

156

long and had 19 stations and 13 substations. The 13 substations were connected via the superconducting

157

feeder cable. Train intervals were set at 2 and 10 minutes and analysis was made at the 1000 seconds. A

158

train interval for 10 minutes is an average train timetable in urban area and a train interval for 2 minutes is

159

assumed at rush time. A simulation model was used a circuit model (Fig. 7). It was analyzed that 13

160

substations - 45 trains (10-car train in urban area) organization was changed for simple equivalent circuit.

161

The following energy conservation law(2,3) was used for an analysis.

RI PT

150

164

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

ܴୗୗ

‫ۍ‬ ࡮‫ێ‬ ‫ێ‬ ‫ ۏ‬0

AC C

162

163

To verify the energy effect

݈ଵ ܴ୪୧୬ୣ



࡮ࡾ࡮୘ ࡵ = ࡮(ࡱ − ൣܹൗ‫ ܫ‬൧)

⋮ ‫ܫ‬୘ଵ ‫ܧ‬ ‫ۍ‬ ‫ې‬ ୗୗ ܹ ‫ې‬ ୘ଵൗ ‫ܫ‬ ‫ێ‬ 0 ‫ܫ‬ ்ଶ ୘ ୘ଵ ‫)ۑ‬ ‫ ࡮ۑ‬൦ ൪ = ࡮(൦ ൪ − ‫ێ‬ ‫ۑ‬ ⋮ ⋮ ‫ۑ‬ ‫ێ‬ ‫ۑ‬ ⋮ ‫ܫ‬ୗେସ 0 ܴୗେ ‫ے‬ ‫ ۏ‬0 ‫ے‬ 0

(2)

(3)

165

B Tieset matrix (closed circuit matrix), RSS Substation internal resistance [Ω], l1 The block distance [m],

166

Rline Feeder resistance [Ω], Rrail Rail resistance [Ω], RSC Superconducting cable resistance [Ω], WT1 The

necessary electric power for the train [W], IT1 TrainMANUSCRIPT electric current [A] ACCEPTED

168

As a result of the analysis, transmission loss reduced by introducing superconducting cable (Fig. 8a,d). And

169

it was possible to send to the train away from the comeback energy, and regeneration energy efficiencies

170

improved (Fig. 8b,e). While the conventional system would provide electricity to the train from the nearest

171

substation, completely connected type sent electricity to the train from all of the substations, reducing the

172

maximum substation current (Fig. 8c,f) and evening out the electric load among the substations. It was

173

found that regeneration energy efficiencies and maximum substation current more improved for 2 minutes

174

train interval. The superconducting feeder system was shown to require more cooling energy and, by

175

reducing the energy, the system can be made more energy efficient. his superconducting feeder model was

176

found to have a smaller Joule heat loss as electricity from the substations was sent to the trains via the

177

conventional feeder line, as well as a higher regenerative ratio, saving 18.3% on 10 minutes interval, 30.2%

178

on 2 minutes interval of the energy as it was possible to send regenerated energy to distant trains (Fig.9a,b).

179

This 10 minutes interval is equivalent to general city transportation. And it was analyzed in urban line for

180

one day average.

181

minutes) (Fig. 10). By introducing superconducting transmission system, the energy saving was 28.3% for

182

one day and the needed cooling energy was calculated 4% using heat intrusion and COP value which was

183

resulted by previous experiment (Table.3). Based on the above, the superconducting feeder system offers the

184

greatest benefit in terms of energy saving in DC electrified sections in urban areas. This is because DC

185

sections have higher braking frequencies, or higher regenerative ratios, than AC sections and because the

186

combined total of cancelled regeneration and Joule heat loss exceeds the cooling energy in urban routes. An

187

average city railway model generally adopted the world was assumed and it was also simulated (Fig. 11,

188

Table.4).

189

model line. When it's assumed to have introduced a regeneration system and a superconducting feeder

190

system into the line of the whole world, and the energy-saving amount is converted into CO2 amount of

191

emission, it'll be equivalent to 3.6×105ton-CO2/year in the world. As next step, in order to verify the

192

completely connect type, a 2000m superconducting cable will be introduced in our project started in 2016.

193

M AN U

SC

RI PT

167

AC C

EP

TE D

A railway timetable at one day was imitated at three patterns (train interval for 10, 4.5, 2

By introducing the superconducting system, the energy saving was 5.0% for one day on this

194

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

4. Conclusion

A superconducting feeder cable system was developed with the aim of saving energy in the global rail

196

transport system. It was confirmed that it's formed as a system through the verification test. As the results of

197

energy analysis, it was found that the benefits of introducing the superconducting feeder system include

198

higher regeneration efficiency, reduced power loss, equalization of load between substations, and it can be

199

5% energy saving system on city rail line model. Table.5 shows the current and next tests. As future's

200

schedule, the superconducting feeder cable is introduced into commercial lines of Tokyo metropolitan in

201

2018, and it works. Then, a superconducting cable of 2000m in length will be introduced in 2021 in a project

202

which is supported by New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization. As railway lines

203

continue to be built to meet the increasing demand for transport in line with the world’s growing population,

204

the superconducting feeder system can be the solution to today’s electric energy issues.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

195

205

Reference 1.

Review. 27, 16-24 (2001).

208

209

R. Smith, Railway technology -The last 50 years and future prospect. Japan Railway & Transport

2.

AC C

207

EP

206

R. C. Pietzcker et al., Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models. Energy 64, 95-108 (2014).

210

211

3.

212

(2008)107-116.

213

4.

214

B, Mathiesen et al.,

Integrated transport and renewable energy systems. Util Policy. 16

W. Gunselmann, Technologies for increased energy efficiency in railway systems. Power Electronics and Applications, 2005 European Conference on. 10 (2005).

X. Feng, B. Mao, X. Feng, J. Feng, Study on theMANUSCRIPT maximum operation speeds of metro trains for energy ACCEPTED

5.

saving as well as transport efficiency improvement. Energy 36, 6577-6582 (2011).

216

6.

A. Rupp, H. Baier, P. Mertiny, M. Secanell, Analysis of a flywheel energy storage system for light rail transit. Energy 107, 625-638 (2016).

218

219

7.

220

(1999) 657-679.

221

8.

A.Schafer et al., A Global passenger travel: implications for carbon dioxide emissions. Energy 24

(2011). 9.

Y. Mochinaga, Recent Trend of Power Feeding Technique for Electric Railways. Q. R. Railway Tech. Res. Inst., 41 144 (2000).

10.

Society Summer Meeting, 1, 445-450 (1999).

226

11.

12.

232

233

13.

M. Tomita, K. Suzuki, Y. Fukumoto, A. Ishihara, M. Muralidhar, Next generation of prototype direct

current superconducting cable for railway system, J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 109, no. 6, p. 63909 (2011). 14.

J. G. Bednorz, K. A. Müller, Possible highTc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system. Phys. B. 64, 189 (1986).

234

235

M. Tomita, Y. Fukumoto, K. Suzuki, M. Muralidhar, Development of prototype DC superconducting cable for railway system, Physica C, vol. 470, S. 1007-1008 (2010).

230

231

EP

(2005).

228

229

T. Kobayashi, Progress of Electric Railways in Japan. Japan Railway & Transport Review. 42, 62-69

AC C

227

B. Bhargava, Railway electrification systems and configurations. Conference: Power Engineering

TE D

224

225

SC

D. Banister, et al., Transportation and the environment. Ann Rev Environ and Resour 36(1) 247-70

222

223

RI PT

217

M AN U

215

15.

M. K. Wu, et al. Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed-phase Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at

ambient pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. ACCEPTED 58, 908 (1987).MANUSCRIPT

236 237

16.

H. Maeda, Y. Tanaka, N. Fukutomi, T. Asano, New high-Tc superconductors without rare earth element. J. Appl. Phys. 27, L209 (1988).

238

17.

Y. Iwasa, Case studies in superconducting magnets, (Springer press, 2009)

240

18.

K. H. Onnes, The Superconductivity of Mercury. Comm. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden; 122, 124, (1911).

241

19.

M. Tomita, M. Murakami, High-temperature superconductor bulk magnets that can trap magnetic

M. Tomita, M. Muralidhar, K. Suzuki, Y. Fukumoto, A.

temperature superconducting power cable for railway systems. J. Appl. Phys., 111, 63910 (2012).

245

246

Ishihara, Development of 10 kA high

M AN U

244

20.

SC

fields of over 17 tesla at 29 K. Nature 421, 517-520 (2003).

242

243

RI PT

239

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and the Japan

248

Science and Technology Agency, Strategic Promotion of Innovative Research and Development

249

(S-Innovation).

EP

TE D

247

We thank H. Ohsaki, T. Kiss, S. Fuchino, T. Masuda, N. Tamada, H. Kitaguchi, J. Shimoyama, N.

251

Amemiya, S. Hata, T. Tamegai for technical support in S-Innovation project. We thank also IZUHAKONE

252

Railway Co., Ltd., East Japan Railway Company, West Japan Railway Company, Tokyo Metro Co., Ltd.,

253

Bureau of Transportation Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Tokyu Corporation, Hankyu Corporation and

254

SNCF for railways technical supports, T. Nishihara, A. Maeda, H. Shigeeda, T. Konishi and G. Morita for

255

experiments support.

AC C

250

256

257

Author Contributions

258

M. T. conceived the study and supervised. K. S., Y.MANUSCRIPT F., A. I., T. A., Y. K. and performed experiments and ACCEPTED

259

analysis.

261

Additional Information

262

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

263

SC

264

RI PT

260

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

265

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Rail lines in the world and Rail electrification systems in Japan and European

countries.

EP

Figure 1

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

266

a, The red lines represent existing rail lines in the world.

AC C

developed rail lines.

b, Rail electrification systems in Japan. systems are more popular in local areas.

Western countries and Japan have highly

DC systems are more widely used in city areas while AC c, Rail electrification systems in European countries.

Some European countries prefer DC systems while others favor AC systems. 267

268

Figure 2

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Flow model of electricity from substations to trains on railways.

SC

Electricity generated at substations is sent to trains through power transmission lines.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

269

Figure 3 a,

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Method of verifying superconducting feeder cable system.

Flow model of electricity from power stations to trains on railways.

And then, electricity is sent

TE D

power stations is sent to substations through power transmission lines.

Electricity generated at

from substation to trains through superconducting feeder cable. A system in which substations are partially connected with a superconducting feeder

AC C

cable.(Partially type)

EP

b,

Partially connecting with a superconducting feeder cable, it can effect energy-saving dependence on the superconducting cable length in addition to the solution for the voltage drop. c,

Superconducting feeder cable system set up along the test track on the premises of the Railway

Technical Research Institute. 270

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

271

Verifying contents of superconducting feeder system by train running test

Rail line

Content

Cable

Test track

31m

6960 A

310m

1110 A

SC

Circulation cooling, Current, Cooling stress

2080 A

Laying through typical line and verification (circulation cooling, current after laying)

Commercial line

Electrical test of notch operation

6m

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

272

Current capacity

RI PT

Table. 1

Figure 4 cooling.

The X-ray image of 31m superconducting cable before and after

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

273

274

275

RI PT

276

277

278

SC

279

M AN U

280

281

Figure 5

Verification of superconducting feeder cable system

282

a,

View of offset part on 310m superconducting feeder cable.

b,

The running test using the 310m superconducting feeder cable system on the test

284

track. 285

c,

TE D

283

Train running test using superconducting feeder cable system set up at Ohito Station

EP

286

on the Izuhakone Railway Sunzu Line. 287

Commercial train running data which is current value through the cable and train

AC C

d,

speed.

Figure 6

Introduction models of superconducting feeder cable for railways.(Completely

type) A system in which substations are completely connected via a superconducting feeder cable.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

288

Table.2

Effects of Introducing superconducting feeder cable for railways.

A system in which substations are partially and completely connected via a superconducting feeder cable.

Regeneration energy

○* ○

Solution of voltage drop (increase train schedules, fewer substations)





Load leveling substations

△*



SS

SS

SS

SC

SS

AC C

Figure 7

b Distance / km

SS

EP

a

TE D

290

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0

200

400 600 Time / s

Analysis model and train timetable of superconducting cables on railways.

a, Electrical circuit model of superconducting cables on railways.

293



M AN U

289

292



Solution of feeder energy loss

*Depending on superconducting cable length

291

Completely type

RI PT

Partially type

Issue

b, Model of train timetable .

800

1000

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Energy analysis results for introduction effects of railway transmission system

SC

Figure 8

M AN U

a(d), A line impedance loss with/without superconducting feeder cable model in urban area (a : train interval for 10 minutes, d : train interval for 2 minutes).

b(e), A regeneration energy with/without

superconducting feeder cable model in urban area (b : train interval

for 10 minutes, e : train interval for 2

TE D

minutes) c(f), A max substation current with/without superconducting feeder cable model in urban area (c : train interval for 10 minutes, f : train interval for 2 minutes).

AC C

EP

294

Figure 9

Energy analysis results for superconducting feeder cable model in urban area (a : train

interval for 10 minutes, b : train interval for 2 minutes). 295

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

296

Time / hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0

4.5 minutes interval

Train: 45-trains

2 minutes interval

SC

Train: 20-trains

Railway simulation model for 2, 4.5, 10 minutes train interval in urban area.

Energy analysis for introduction effects of railway transmission system for one day.

TE D

Table. 3

10 minutes interval

M AN U

Figure 10

Train: 9-trains

RI PT

Train: none

Total energy [kW]

Substation output

15130

49%

1314

4%

14328

47%

Conventional system

22939

77%





6681

23%

Superconducting system





1314

100 %





Conventional system













Superconducting system

6052

44%

1314

10%

6292

46%

Conventional system

9014

73%





3294

27%

Superconducting system

14751

50%

1314

4%

13904

46%

Conventional system

22801

81%





5504

19%

Superconducting system

33586

50%

1314

2%

31628

48%

Conventional system

49977

75%





16883

25%

AC C

No train

Train interval for 10 minutes

Train interval for 4.5 minutes

Train interval for 2 minutes

297

Regeneration energy[kW]

Superconducting system

EP

1day average

Cooling energy

Energy saving

28.3%

18.3%

29.5%

30.2%

1

2

3

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

4

21 22 23

8 minutes interval

Train: 21-trains

5 minutes interval

Train: 34-trains

3 minutes interval

SC

Figure 11

Train: 13-trains

Railway simulation model assumed an average city railway model generally adopted

M AN U

the world .

Table. 4

RI PT

Train: none

Energy analysis for introduction effects of railway transmission system for one day on an

TE D

average city railway model generally adopted the world. Total energy [kW]

Substation output

9080

64%

1238

9%

3909

27%

Conventional system

10856

80%





2657

20%

Superconducting system





1238

100%





Conventional system













Superconducting system

10385

69%

1238

8%

3560

23%

Conventional system

12472

86%





2110

14%

Superconducting system

13859

60%

1238

5%

8075

35%

Conventional system

16440

73%





6037

27%

Superconducting system

20561

54%

1238

3%

16183

43%

Conventional system

24129

63%





14019

37%

AC C

No train

Train interval for 8 minutes

Train interval for 5 minutes

Train interval For 3 minutes

298

Regeneration energy[kW]

Superconducting system

EP

1day average

Cooling energy

Energy saving

5.0%

6.8%

8.2%

9.7%

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Schedules of superconducting feeder system verification

Rail line

Current value on train running test

Current capacity

Cable

Test track

250 A

6960 A

31m

Test track

260 A

1110 A

310m

Connection type between substations

Year 2013 2014

Partially

Commercial line Commercial line

880 A

2080 A

6m

(1000-1500 A)

(8100 A)

410m

Test track or commercial line

-

(4000-8000 A) 2000m Completely

SC

( ) Designed

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

299

2015

RI PT

Table. 5

2018

2021

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Content

Cable

Circulation cooling, Current,

Test track

M AN U

Cooling stress

SC

Rail line

RI PT

Table.1Verifying contents of superconducting feeder system by train running test

Current

capacity

31m

6960 A

310m

1110 A

6m

2080 A

Laying through typical line and verification

(circulation cooling, current after laying)

EP

TE D

Electrical test of notch operation

AC C

Commercial line

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RI PT

Table.2 Effects of Introducing superconducting feeder cable for railways.

Partially

Issue

Completely type

type *

SC

Regeneration energy

Solution of voltage drop (increase train schedules, fewer substations) *

AC C

EP

*Depending on superconducting cable length

TE D

Load leveling substations

M AN U

Solution of feeder energy loss

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Total energy [kW] Substation

Cooling

output

energy

Superconducting system

15130

49%

Conventional system

22939

77%

1314

Regeneration energy[kW]

4%

14328

47%

6681

23%

28.3%

Superconducting system

1314

100%

1314

10%

No train

for 4.5 minutes

Train interval for 2 minutes

44%

Conventional system

9014

73%

Superconducting system

14751

50%

Conventional system

22801

81%

Superconducting system

33586

50%

Conventional system

49977

M AN U

Train interval

6052

1314

1314

TE D

for 10 minutes

Superconducting system

75%

EP

Train interval

Table. 3 Energy analysis for introduction effects of railway transmission system for one day.

AC C

SC

Conventional system

RI PT

1day average

Energy saving

4%

2%

6292

46% 18.3%

3294

27%

13904

46% 29.5%

5504

19%

31628

48% 30.2%

16883

25%

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Total energy [kW]

Regeneration energy[kW] Substation

Cooling

output

Energy 64%

Conventional system

10856

80%

1238

1day average

Superconducting system

1238

Conventional system

for 5 minutes Train interval For 3 minutes

69%

Conventional system

12472

86%

Superconducting system

13859

60%

Conventional system

16440

Superconducting system

20561

TE D

Train interval

10385

1238

1238

8%

5%

54%

27%

2657

20%

3560

23% 6.8%

2110

14%

8075

35%

6037

27%

1238

3%

16183

43%

Table. 4 Energy analysis for introduction effects of railway transmission system for one day on an average city railway model generally adopted the world.

5.0%

8.2%

73%

EP

for 8 minutes

Superconducting system

AC C

Train interval

3909

100%

M AN U

No train

9%

RI PT

9080

SC

Superconducting system

Energy saving

9.7%

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Schedules of superconducting feeder system verification

Connection

Current value on train

running Current capacity

Cable

test

type between substations

250 A

6960 A

31m

Test track

260 A

1110 A

310m

Commercial line

880 A

2080 A

6m

Commercial line

(1000-1500 A)

(8100 A)

410m

-

(4000-8000 A)

2013

M AN U

Test track

Year

SC

Rail line

RI PT

Table. 5

2014

commercial line ( ) Designed

or

EP

track

AC C

Test

TE D

Partially

2000m

2015 2017 ~2018

Completely

2021

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights Proposed new railway transmission feeder systems using superconducting

RI PT

materials

Advantages of high regeneration energy, reduce power loss, solution of

SC

voltage drop

Laid the system, conducted train running tests and verified on commercial

M AN U

line

AC C

EP

TE D

Result of analysis, 5% energy saving system on city rail line model