EP-1328: Long term patients clinical outcome after adjuvant postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy

EP-1328: Long term patients clinical outcome after adjuvant postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy

S712 ESTRO 36 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ The NTCP model used previously validate...

211KB Sizes 0 Downloads 22 Views

S712 ESTRO 36 _______________________________________________________________________________________________

The NTCP model used previously validated dosimetric parameters for late rectal bleeding: mean dose (Gy) and V75 (%) as dosimetric predictors for late rectal bleeding. It also included clinical parameters such as haemorrhoids or use of hormonal therapy. The cost-effectiveness was analyzed using an earlier published Markov model. The incremental net monetary benefits (iNMB) was calculated (assuming a willingness to pay of €80.000/QALY). Results The NTCP for the patients with a RBI and the virtual IRS were 4.1% [range: 3.6-5.0%], and 4.0% [range: 3.4%-5.3%] respectively. For the patients with a SPA the mean NTCP was 4.6% [range: 3.7%-6.1%] while this was 4.4% [range: 3.8%-4.7%] for the virtual IRS (Table 1).

The mean iNMB of the RBI was -€ 1062 [range: -€ 1,974-€ 658]. For the virtual IRS in these patients this was -€ 1042 [range: -€ 1,526.8-€ 400]. The mean iNMB of the SPA was -€ 605 [range: -€ 2,383-€ 427]. For the virtual IRS this was -€ 473 [range: -€ 1,405-€ 528] (Figure 1).

The virtual IRS had a 100% classification accuracy for this study, i.e. when the iNMB of the real IRS was negative, so was the iNMB of the virtual spacer, and visaversa.Conclusion Individual patient assessment for implantation of an IRS will increase cost-effective ness of an IRS. The virtual IRS approach in combination with a toxicity prediction model and a cost-effectiveness analyses can serve as a decision support tool for the implantation of either a SPA or a RBI. EP-1328 Long term patients clinical outcome after adjuvant postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy P. Pietro Gabriele (Italy), A. Angelo Maggio, E. Elena Delmastro, E. Elisabetta Garibaldi, S. Sara Bresciani, M. Marco Gatti, A. Andrea Galla, M. Michele Stasi, D. Domenico Gabriele 1 IRCCS-FPO candiolo cancer center, radiotherapy, CANDIOLO Turin, Italy 2 IRCCS-FPO candiolo cancer center, medical physics, candiolo /urin, Italy 3 IRCCS-FPO candiolo cancer center, radiotherapy department, candiolo Turin, Italy

4

SASSARI university, radiotherapy department, SASSARI, Italy Purpose or Objective To study the outcome of patients (pts) treated for prostate cancer with postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after radical surgery Material and Methods From October 1999 and December 2015, 279 patients (age 42-77ys median 66) operated for prostate cancer were treated in our Institution with conformal radiotherapy (3D or IMRT). Median preoperative PSA was 9 (range: 0.5-104), median pathologic GS 7 (range: 4-10) and number of pts with ct1, cT2, cT3 and cT4 were 1, 60, 207 and 11, respectively. Lymph node invasion was presented in 34 patients; the number of nodes removed was 7 (0-38); the number of patients with positive margins were 195 (69 %); post-surgery PSA was 0.073 ng/mL (range: 0-6.22). Radiation therapy was performed with Linac from 1999 to 2009 by 3DCRT and with Tomotherapy from 2010 by IMRTIGRT. Radiation dose were, 70.2 Gy (range 61.6-75.6 Gy) to the prostate bed and 46.8 Gy (45-50.4) to the pelvis, 1.8Gy per fraction. The pelvis was irradiated in 65 patients (24 %). 64 patients (23%) were treated during RT with hormone therapy and 49 (18%) followed the treatment after RT. Results With a median FU of 73.4 (range: 4-212) months from the end of RT the 10 years prostate Cancer Specific Survival was 88%; the Clinical Relapse Free Survival was 72% and Biochemical Relapse Free Survival 60%. Cox univariate and multivariate (MVA) analysis were performed. In MVA, the pathologic Gleason Score (p<0.0001; HR>1.49) and last follow-up PSA (p<0.001;HR>1.0006) were significantly predictors for prostate Cancer Specific Survival, Clinical Relapse Free Survival and Biochemical Relapse Free Survival. Conclusion In this, based on a large database, it was found that the Gleason score and the PSA measured at last low-up were significantly independent prognostic factors of survival for patients treated with postprostatectomy adjuvant RT. Acknowledgments: This work was supported by “5 per Mille 2009 Ministero Salute-FPRCOnlus”. EP-1329 IG-SBRT for localized prostate cancer: clinical results and late toxicity of a phase-II study A. Magli1, E. Moretti2, A. Tullio3, C. Foti2, M. Crespi2, M. Urpis1, A. Prisco1, M.R. Malisan4 1 ASUIUD, Radiation Oncology, Udine, Italy 2 ASUIUD, Medical Physics, Udine, Italy 3 Hygiene and Clinical Epidemiology Institute - University of Udine, Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Udine, Italy 4 ICTP, Master of Advanced Studies in Medical Physics, Trieste, Italy Purpose or Objective To evaluate the clinical outcome and late toxicity of a phase II study dealing with SBRT with a total dose of 42 Gy in 7 fractions, in patients with localized prostate cancer at low/intermediate risk (according to NCCN score) and at risk of pelvic lymph node involvement inferior to 17% as evaluated by the Roach formula. Material and Methods This study was based on a prospective analysis of 42 patients enrolled between May 2013 and November 2014. For planning, the GTV included the prostate with the 1/3 proximal seminal vesicles without margin; a margin of 5 mm in all directions around the GTV was applied to define the PTV. All patients were treated with IG-SBRT, utilizing VMAT technique with a 2 full arcs arrangement and photons with beam energy of 6 MV, according to pre-