Epidermal characters of Tamarix L. (Tamaricaceae) from Northwest China and their taxonomic and palaeogeographic implications

Journal of Palaeogeography, 2018, 7(2): 179e196 (00146)

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect journal homepage: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-palaeogeography/

Biopalaeogeography and palaeoecology

Epidermal characters of Tamarix L. (Tamaricaceae) from Northwest China and their taxonomic and palaeogeographic implications Jian-Wei Zhang a,*, Ashalata D'Rozario b , Shi-Min Duan Xi-Yong Wang a,c, Xiao-Qing Liang d , Bo-Rong Pan a,c

a,c

,

a

Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 818 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China b Department of Botany, Narasinha Dutt College, 129 Bellilious Road, Howrah 711101, West Bengal, India c Turpan Eremophytes Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Turpan 838008, Xinjiang, China d School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi 653100, Yunnan, China

Abstract The taxonomical position of species of the genus Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) has been criticized because of their gross morphological similarities (such as slender, smooth and reddishebrown branches, greyegreen foliage and scale leaves), and their systematic relationships remain unclear. In this paper, the leaf epidermal features of 17 species from China are studied based on the micro-morphological characters of the epidermal cells, stomata, salt glands, papillae and epidermal hairs. According to the studies, the leaf epidermal features, together with the character of the flower, are taxonomically clearly distinct. The establishment of Tamarix albiflonum is consolidated. Tamarix korolkowi and Tamarix ramosissima have minimal differences in epidermal characters, and the former is suggested to be a junior synonym. Tamarix ramosissima, Tamarix tarimensis, Tamarix arceuthoides and Tamarix hohenackeri are most similar with respect to their leaf epidermis; considering the common morphological features, habit, distribution and especially the hybridization, it is suggested that these four species are closely genetically related and that the variations among them are probably intraspecific. The new taxonomical evidence indicates the occurrence of 13 species and four variants in China. Presently, Tamarix is a typical plant of arid and semi-arid regions, but its Eocene ancestors lived in warm and humid climates in the coastal areas of the ancient Mediterranean Sea. Thus, the papillae or epidermal hairs, which are outgrowths of the outer epidermal cells facilitating the leaf to respond to water stress and commonly seen in the plants growing in arid or semi-arid areas rather than the plants in warm and humid climates, are of relatively recent origin in Tamarix. The primitive species lack papillae or epidermal hairs, while in evolved species these structures are abundant. Based on the ecological adaptations of the epidermal features, the palaeogeographic implications of Tamarix in the Late Cenozoic of Northwest China are also discussed.

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.-W. Zhang). Peer review under responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jop.2018.01.003 2095-3836/© 2018 China University of Petroleum (Beijing). Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Petroleum (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

180

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Keywords Anatomy, Arid region, Epidermis, Ecological adaptation, Phylogenetic evolution, Tamarix, Northwest China © 2018 China University of Petroleum (Beijing). Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Petroleum (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Received 5 October 2017; accepted 16 January 2018; available online 31 January 2018

1.

Introduction

The genus Tamarix L. (Tamaricaceae) with about 90 species is a salt- and alkali-tolerant plant, forming evergreen or deciduous shrubs or trees with scale-like leaves, discontinuously distributed in the arid and semi-arid areas of Eurasia, Africa and around the coast of the ancient Mediterranean Sea (Baum, 1978; Liu et al., 2012; Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Yin, 1995). China is considered to be the secondary center of origin of Tamarix, containing 18e20 species, which are mainly distributed in the northwestern area, in Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia (Liu et al., 2012; Pan, 1998; Yin and Yang, 1998; Zhang and Liu, 1988). Among these species, nearly 45 percent (8/ 18) are locally endemic. The species of Tamarix from northwestern China show similarity in gross morphologies, such as slender, smooth and reddishebrown branches and greyegreen foliage, thus, they lack clear and obvious taxonomical characters (Zhang, 2004a, 2005; Zhang et al., 2002). As such, identification, systematic position and relationships of the species are uncertain and have been widely discussed (Cheng et al., 2000; Feng and Yin, 2000; Hua et al., 2004; Wei et al., 1999; Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Zhang, 2004a, 2005; Zhang et al., 2000, 2002). Based on the extant distribution, the fossil record and the palaeogeography, the genus Tamarix probably originated in the Eocene, in coastal areas of the ancient Mediterranean Sea, and its ancestors thrived under warm and humid climatic conditions (Li et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2003a). After the Miocene, with the retreat of the ancient Tethys Sea, the genus spreads eastwards, and some representatives extended to China via the Central Asia Region (Zhang et al., 2003a). During this diffusion, differentiation occurred as adaptations to the arid and cool climates (Zhang et al., 2003a). The taxonomical research of Chinese Tamarix dates back to the 18th century (Loureiro, 1790). In recent years, such kind of studies has been carried out indepth, focusing on leaf and flower morphology and anatomy (Feng and Yin, 2000; Liu et al., 2012; Wei et al., 1999; Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Zhai et al.,

1983; Zhang, 2004a; Zhang et al., 2003b), seed and pollen morphology (Xi, 1988; Zhang, 2004b; Zhang et al., 1998, 2001), chromosome number (Zhai and Li, 1986), phytochemistry (Cheng et al., 2000) and molecular aspects (Gaskin et al., 2004; Hua et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2000). However, the taxonomical position of some species, e.g., Tamarix albiflonum M.T.Liu and Tamarix korolkowi Rgel & Schmalh., is still being questioned (Liu et al., 2012; Yang and Gaskin, 2007). Because of their morphological similarity and natural hybridization, some species, e.g., Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., T. korolkowi, Tamarix tarimensis P.Y.Zhang & M.T.Liu, Tamarix arceuthoides Bunge and Tamarix hohenackeri Bunge are difficult to distinguish (Zhang, 2004a; Zhang and Zhang, 1990). Even the extinction of some species, such as Tamarix jintaensis Zhang et Liu and Tamarix sachensis Zhang et Liu, is doubted (Pan, 1998; Wang and Yin, 2004; Yang et al., 2002; Yin, 2002). Thus, the species in China lack a unified and widely accepted system of classification (Feng and Yin, 2000; Hua et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2012; Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Zhang, 2004a, 2005; Zhang and Zhang, 1990; Zhang et al., 2002, 2003b). Tamarix is a genus with highly chaotic classification (Hua et al., 2004; Xun et al., 2007; Zhang, 2004a; Zhang et al., 2002). As to the systematics, the phylogenetic relationship of the species is also not clear. In the studies of the 16 species from China, Hua et al. (2004) and Zhang (2004a) have given controversial results based on either morphological characters or molecular data. Foliar epidermal characters, such as epidermal cells, stomata, trichomes and salt glands, have been used as taxonomic and phylogenetic features among the angiosperms (Abbruzzese et al., 2013; Baranova, 1987, 1992; Gupta and Murty, 1984; Jones, 1986; Wang et al., 2015). Currently, studies of leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix are relatively rare. Gupta and Murty (1984) have described the leaf epidermal structures in some species of Tamaricaceae. Lately, Abbruzzese et al. (2013) and Kuzminsky et al. (2014) have studied the epidermal morphology of Tamarix africana Poiret and Tamarix gallica Linnaeus from southern Italy. Alaimo et al. (2013) also studied the leaf anatomy of Tamarix arborea var. arborea. In China, Zhai et al. (1983) have

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

181

described some general structures of leaf epidermis, and Zhang et al. (2003b) have studied some epidermal features of young branches from 16 species. In the present paper, we report the leaf epidermal characters of 17 species from China. The micromorphological features of epidermal cells, stomata, salt glands, papillae and epidermal hairs of both adaxial and abaxial epidermis are described. Based on these epidermal variations, the taxonomical position and systematic relationships among species of Tamarix are discussed.

which means there are four petals in a flower, and the five-merous flower, which means there are five petals in a flower. Then, the 17 species are grouped on the basis of their flower: The first group includes the species which only have four-merous flowers; the second group includes the species which only have five-merous flowers; a third group includes those species which have both four-merous and five-merous flowers.

2.

Material and methods

2.1.

Selection of the extant species in China

Eighteen species and two variants of Tamarix are recorded from China (Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Zhang and Zhang, 1990). In the recent publication by Liu et al. (2012), two species, T. albiflonum and T. korolkowi, are also added to the subregion of China. Among these species, Tamarix aphylla (Linnaeus) Karsten which is only cultivated in Taiwan of China (Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Zhang and Zhang, 1990), is not included in this study. T. jintaensis, T. sachensis and Tamarix laxa Willd. var. polystachya (Ledeb.) Bunge were not available for study, some of them are doubted to be extinct (pers. comm. Prof. Bo-Rong Pan). The 17 species in the current study are listed in Table 1.

2.2.

Group of the species

In the Chinese species of genus Tamarix, two types of flowers have been founddthe four-merous flower,

2.3.

Study method of leaf epidermis

The growing branches with leaves have been immersed in 20% CrO3 solution for 48e72 h, according to the standard protocols (Alvin and Boulter, 1974; Kerp, 1990). The epidermis of scale-like leaves have been watered, cleaned with 50% alcohol and peeled under a Leica S8APO stereoscope microscope. About 50 leaves of each species have been prepared. The leaf epidermis was then stained in 0.5% safranine solution, mounted on microscope slides and observed under an Olympus BX51 stereomicroscope and photographed with a PixeLINK Megapixel FireWire Camera (DSC-600). The leaf epidermis was also mounted on a scanning stake and photographed under a Zeiss Supra-55VP scanning electron microscope.

3.

Results

3.1.

General leaf epidermal characters

The leaves of Tamarix from China are bifacial with stomata and salt glands distributed on both adaxial and abaxial epidermis (Table 2). The cells on both adaxial and abaxial epidermis are polygonal, isodiametric,

Table 1 Species of the genus Tamarix from the Herbarium of Turpan Eremophytes Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Turpan, Xinjiang, Northwest China. Tamarix species T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

elongata Ledeb. laxa Willd. androssowii Litv. taklamakanensis M.T.Liu albiflonum M.T.Liu austromongolica Nakai chinensis Lour. leptostachya Bunge karelinii Bunge hispida Willd. ramosissima Ledeb. korolkowi Rgel & Schmalh. tarimensis P.Y.Zhang & M.T.Liu arceuthoides Bunge hohenackeri Bunge gracilis Willd. gansuensis H.Z.Zhang ex P.Y.Zhang & M.T.Liu

Specimen No.

Identified by and date

Collection sites

00075400 00021365 00080 00075448 e 002287 00097 00075349 00075433 00079615 00079616 0055144 00075429 00075405 00075417 002291 00078

M.T. Liu, 13/7/2009 M.T. Liu, 4/1/1988 M.T. Liu, 21/12/1977 M.T. Liu, 27/1/1981 e M.T. Liu, 30/8/1978 M.T. Liu, 29/1/1978 M.T. Liu, 13/7/2009 M.T. Liu, 20/8/1978 M.T. Liu, 13/7/2009 M.T. Liu, 13/7/2009 M.T. Liu, 2/9/1978 Krym, 14/12/1999 M.T. Liu, 13/9/2009 M.T. Liu, 13/7/2009 M.T. Liu, 5/8/1978 M.T. Liu, 30/8/1978

Yanqi (Qarasahr) County, Xinjiang Cele (Qira) County, Xinjiang Minle County, Gansu Lop Nor, Xinjiang Turpan Eremophytes Botanical Garden, CAS Bayannuur, Inner Mongolia Zhanhua County, Shandong Shihezi City, Xinjiang Qaidam Basin, Qinghai Zhongwei County, Ningxia Zhongwei County, Ningxia Aksu City, Xinjiang Minfeng County, Xinjiang Wusu City, Xinjiang Hami City, Xinjiang Minle County, Gansu Aksu City, Xinjiang

182

Table 2 Leaf epidermal characters of species of the genus Tamarix from China. Flower merous

4

5

Species

Length/width

Anticlinal walls

Inner surface, adaxial epidermis

Inner surface, abaxial epidermis

Outer surface, abaxial epidermis

Papillae present; salt glands sunken Papillae present; salt glands raised Papillae present; salt glands raised Papilla absent; salt glands raised Papillae present; salt glands raised Papillae present; salt glands raised Papillae present; salt glands sunken Papillae present; salt glands sunken Papillae present; salt glands sunken Long epidermal hairs present, salt glands raised or sunken Epidermal hairs present; salt glands raised

Flat, papilla absent; cells round Flat, papilla absent; cells elongated Flat, papilla absent; cells round Flat, papilla absent; cells quadrangular Flat, papilla absent; cells quadrangular Flat, papilla absent; cells round Papillae present; cells quadrangular Papillae present; cells spindleshaped Fewer papillae present; cells round Long epidermal hairs present; cells polygonal Papillae with ‘wall’-like structure between cell files present; cells polygonal Papillae with ‘wall’-like structure between cell files present; cells polygonal Papillae present; cells polygonal Papillae present; cells polygonal Papillae present; cells polygonal Flat, papilla absent; cells wedge-shaped Papillae present; cells round

Round/oval

1.21 ± 0.15

Straight

Concave

Flat

T. laxa

Quadrangular

1.93 ± 0.61

Straight

Concave

Flat

T. androssowii

Irregular

1.28 ± 0.39

Undulated

Concave

Flat

T. taklamakanensis

Quadrangular

2.12 ± 0.88

Straight

Flat

Flat

T. albiflonum

Polygonal

1.25 ± 0.45

Straight

Concave

Flat

T. austromongolica

Elongated

2.36 ± 1.31

Straight

Concave

Flat

T. chinensis

Quadrangular

1.62 ± 0.40

Straight

Concave

Concave

T. leptostachya

Round/oval

1.28 ± 0.63

Concave

Concave

T. karelinii

Round/oval

1.02 ± 0.13

Undulated or straight Straight

Concave

Concave

T. hispida

Polygonal

1.06 ± 0.41

Straight

Concave

Concave

T. ramosissima

Irregular

1.19 ± 0.35

Undulated

Concave

Concave

T. korolkowi

Polygonal or irregular

1.07 ± 0.73

Undulated or straight

Concave

Concave

Epidermal hairs present; salt glands raised

T. tarimensis

1.28 ± 0.26

Straight

Concave

Concave

1.28 ± 0.21

Undulated

Concave

Concave

T. hohenackeri

Polygonal or irregular Polygonal or irregular Polygonal or irregular

1.25 ± 0.42

Undulated

Concave

Concave

T. gracilis

Round/oval

1.30 ± 0.41

Straight

Concave

T. gansuensis

Irregular

0.93 ± 0.34

Undulated

Concave

Flat or concave Concave

Epidermal hairs present; salt glands raised Epidermal hairs present; salt glands raised Epidermal hairs present; salt glands raised Papillae present; salt glands sunken Epidermal hairs present; salt glands sunken

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Outer surface, adaxial epidermis

T. elongata

T. arceuthoides

4 and 5

Cells on adaxial epidermis Shape

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

183

round or irregular in shape, and their anticlinal walls are undulated or straight on the adaxial epidermis, but straight on the abaxial epidermis. The cells on the adaxial epidermis are slightly smaller and regularly arranged in longitudinal files, while they are slightly larger, and mostly irregularly arranged on the abaxial epidermis. The adaxial epidermis is usually strongly papillate or covered with epidermal hairs; while the abaxial epidermis is flat, swollen, papillate or covered with epidermal hairs. The salt glands are round in shape, irregularly arranged, raised or sunken on the adaxial epidermis, but sunken on the abaxial epidermis. The stomata are oblong- or spindle-shaped, smaller than the glands, sunken on both adaxial and abaxial epidermis, and mostly their long axes are nearly vertical to the long axis of the leaves.

adaxial epidermis is swollen and has papillae or epidermal hairs (Fig. 2e and k). T. albiflonum differs from T. austromongolica in the irregularly arranged cells (Fig. 2a and c) and the stout papillae (Fig. 2e) on the adaxial epidermis; since in T. austromongolica, cells are regularly arranged (Fig. 2g and i) and papillae elongated to epidermal hairs (Fig. 2k) on the adaxial epidermis. The other nine species, T. chinensis Lour., T. leptostachya Bunge, T. karelinii Bunge, T. hispida Willd., T. ramosissima, T. korolkowi, T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri, have swollen abaxial epidermis, that is, their abaxial epidermis is clearly papillate or has epidermal hairs. In species of T. chinensis (Fig. 2q), T. leptostachya (Fig. 2w) and T. karelinii (Fig. 3e), the papillae on the adaxial epidermis are stout and not elongated. T. karelinii can be distinguished from T. chinensis and T. leptostachya by the comparatively flatter abaxial epidermis, which has fewer papillae (Fig. 3f), while the abaxial epidermis of T. chinensis and T. leptostachya is clearly swollen and densely papillate (Fig. 2r and x). T. chinensis differs from T. leptostachya in the polygonal cells on the abaxial epidermis (Fig. 2p and r), which are spindle-shaped in T. leptostachya (Fig. 2v and x). In species of T. hispida, T. ramosissima, T. korolkowi, T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri, the papillae on the adaxial epidermis are elongated to long or short epidermal hairs (Figs. 3k, q, w and 4e, k, q). T. hispida is distinguishable by the long epidermal hairs on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis (Fig. 3k and l), while in the other five species, the adaxial epidermis has short epidermal hairs (Figs. 3q, w and 4e, k, q), and the abaxial epidermis has stout papillae (Figs. 3r, x and 4f, l, r). T. ramosissima and T. korolkowi show minimal difference in epidermal characters; but they differ from T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri typically in the ‘wall’-like structure occurring between cell files on the abaxial epidermis (Fig. 3r and x), since in the latter three species, the abaxial epidermis has no ‘wall’-like structure (Fig. 4f, l, r). T. tarimensis differs slightly from T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri in the straight cell walls on the adaxial epidermis (Fig. 4c), since the latter two species have only undulated cell walls (Fig. 4i and o). T. arceuthoides differs from T. hohenackeri by the clearly elongated epidermal hairs on the adaxial epidermis (Fig. 4k), since the epidermal hairs in T. hohenackeri are shorter (Fig. 4q).

3.2. Leaf epidermal character variation in species with four-merous flower The three species, Tamarix elongata, T. laxa and Tamarix androssowii, only have four-merous flowers. T. androssowii Litv. is distinguishable from T. elongata Ledeb. and T. laxa Willd. by the undulated cell walls on the adaxial epidermis (Fig. 1m and o), since the latter two species have only straight cell walls (Fig. 1a, c, g, i); the papillae on the adaxial epidermis of T. androssowii are slender (height of papilla is smaller compared to width; Fig. 1q), while they are stout (height of papilla nearly equal to or a bit larger than its width) in T. elongata and T. laxa (Table 2; Fig. 1e and k), that is, the height of the papilla is distinguishable. T. elongata differs from T. laxa typically in the short, round and isodiametric cells on the abaxial epidermis (Fig. 1f), since the cells on the abaxial epidermis of T. laxa are quadrangular and elongated (Fig. 1l).

3.3. Leaf epidermal character variation in species with five-merous flower The twelve species, Tamarix taklamakanensis, T. albiflonum, Tamarix austromongolica, Tamarix chinensis, Tamarix leptostachya, Tamarix karelinii, Tamarix hispida, T. ramosissima, T. korolkowii, T. arceuthoides, T. tarimensis and T. hohenackeri, only have five-merous flowers. Among them, the three species of T. taklamakanensis M.T.Liu, T. albiflonum and T. austromongolica Nakai have flat abaxial epidermis, that is, their abaxial epidermis lacks papillae or epidermal hair (Figs. 1x and 2f, l). T. taklamakanensis is distinguishable from T. albiflonum and T. austromongolica in the adaxial epidermis, which is flat and lacks papillae or epidermal hair (Fig. 1w), while in the latter two species, the

3.4. Leaf epidermal character variation in species with both four-merous and five-merous flower Tamarix gracilis Willd. shows the adaxial epidermis papillate and the papillae stout (Fig. 4w) and the

184

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Fig. 1 Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from China: aef e Tamarix elongata; gel e Tamarix laxa; mer e Tamarix androssowii; sex e Tamarix taklamakanensis. aeb, geh, men, set e Light micrographs, scale bar = 200 mm; a, g, m, s e Adaxial epidermis; b, h, n, t e Abaxial epidermis. cef, iel, oer, uex e Scanning electron micrographs, scale bar = 40 mm; c, i, o, u e Adaxial epidermis, inner surface; d, j, p, v e Abaxial epidermis, inner surface; e, k, q, w e Adaxial epidermis, outer surface; f, l, r, x e Abaxial epidermis, outer surface. Arrow 1 e A cell, round, anticlinal walls straight; Arrow 2 e A stoma, oblong or spindle-shaped, long axis nearly vertical to long axis of the leaf; Arrow 3 e A cell, strongly concave, periclinal wall with a pit; Arrow 4 e A salt gland, round, larger than stoma; Arrow 5 e A papilla, stout and ball-shaped; Arrow 6 e A salt gland, sunken; Arrow 7 e A cell, surface flat or slightly swollen, lacking papilla; Arrow 8 e A cell, slightly elongated, anticlinal walls straight; Arrow 9 e A salt gland, irregularly arranged; Arrow 10 e A salt gland, raised; Arrow 11 e A cell, surface flat or slightly swollen, lacking papilla; Arrow 12 e A salt gland, sunken; Arrow 13 e A cell, anticlinal walls undulated; Arrow 14 e A cell, slightly concave or having straight periclinal walls; Arrow 15 e A fine papilla, slender; Arrow 16 e An epidermal surface, flat, lacking papilla or epidermal hair; Arrow 17 e A salt gland, raised; Arrow 18 e An epidermal surface flat, lacking papilla or epidermal hair.

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

185

abaxial epidermis flat or slightly papillate (Fig. 4x). Thus, T. gracilis is more similar to the species with four-merous flower (Table 2). Tamarix gansuensis H.Z.Zhang ex P.Y.Zhang & M.T.Liu has the adaxial epidermis covered with the epidermal hairs (Fig. 5e), and the abaxial epidermis covered with stout papillae (Fig. 5f), thus being more similar to T. ramosissima, T. korolkowi, T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri among species with five-merous flower. T. gracilis can be distinguished from T. gansuensis by the wedge-shaped epidermal cells on the abaxial epidermis (Fig. 4x).

very similar in epidermal characters. Their cells are polygonal, isodiametric or irregular in shape; their adaxial epidermis is strongly papillate, and the papillae are elongated to short epidermal hairs (Figs. 3q and 4e, k, q); their abaxial epidermis is swollen, and the papillae are stout, ball-shaped and not elongated (Figs. 3r and 4f, l, r). These four species only differ slightly in the cell walls and the epidermal hairs on the adaxial epidermis, and the thickened cell walls on the abaxial epidermis (Table 2). Morphologically, T. ramosissima, T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri also show close similarities in the flower merous, the length of racemes, the shape and length of petals and sepals, the size of capsule, and the shape and size of leaves and bracts (Table 3). T. tarimensis and T. hohenackeri differ from T. ramosissima by the smaller leave size; Tamarix arceuthoides differs from T. ramosissima in possessing longer racemes and smaller leaves and bracts, and petals of the former are completely open and deciduous after anthesis than half open and persistent in fruit as in the case of the latter (Table 3). Besides, the three species T. ramosissima, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri can be hybridized among themselves (Liu et al., 2012; Zhang and Zhang, 1990). Based on the above discussion, T. ramosissima, T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri are closely related genetically. The variations between them probably are intraspecific. Therefore, we consider T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri as variants of T. ramosissima: T. ramosissima var. tarimensis, T. ramosissima var. arceuthoides and T. ramosissima var. hohenackeri.

4.

Discussion

4.1.

Taxonomic implication

Although T. albiflonum is unique by its white flowers (Liu, 1994; Liu et al., 2012), this species has been confused with T. androssowii for a long time (Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Zhang and Zhang, 1990). Based on our studies, T. albiflonum differs distinctly from T. androssowii in epidermal characters. In T. albiflonum, the cells are irregularly arranged with straight walls on the adaxial epidermis (Fig. 2a and c), while they are regularly arranged in files with undulated walls in T. androssowii (Fig. 1m and o); the papillae on the adaxial epidermis of T. albiflonum are stout (Fig. 2e), while they are slender in T. androssowii (Fig. 1q). Besides, on account of the above descriptions (Table 2), T. albiflonum also clearly differs from other species in China. Thus, our studies consolidate the establishment of this species. Some plants from China were considered to be T. korolkowi, which has been described from Russian and Central Asia (Liu, 1994; Liu et al., 2012). Zhang and Zhang (1990) discussed these plants based on the morphological similarities to T. ramosissima or T. leptostachya, and thought the Chinese T. korolkowi could be a hybrid of T. ramosissima and T. leptostachya. Based on our studies, T. korolkowi shows minimal differences with T. ramosissima in epidermal characters (Table 2), and their common features include the undulated cell walls on the adaxial epidermis (Fig. 3o and u) and the ‘wall’-like structure occurring between cell files on the abaxial epidermis (Fig. 3r and x). Thus, we agree with Zhang and Zhang (1990) and also consider the Chinese T. korolkowi as a synonym of T. ramosissima. Based on the above descriptions, T. ramosissima, T. tarimensis, T. arceuthoides and T. hohenackeri are

4.2.

Taxonomic treatment

Tamarix ramosissima var. ramosissima Ledeb. ≡ Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., Flora Altaica [Ledebour] (1829) 424; Flora Orientalis [Boissier] (1867) 776; Taxon [Villar] (2014) 1140. Tamarix ramosissima var. tarimensis (P.Y.Zhang & M.T.Liu) J.W.Zhang & B.R.Pan, comb. nov. ≡ Tamarix tarimensis P.Y.Zhang & M.T.Liu, Acta Bot BorealOccid Sin [Zhang] (1988) 263. Tamarix ramosissima var. arceuthoides (Bunge) J.W.Zhang & B.R.Pan, comb. nov. ≡ Tamarix arceu
m Acad Imp Sci St-Pe
tersbourg thoides Bunge, Me Divers Savans [Bunge] (1851) 295; Beitr Fl Russl [Bunge] (1852a) 119. Tamarix ramosissima var. hohenackeri (Bunge) J.W.Zhang & B.R.Pan, comb. nov. ≡ Tamarix hohenackeri Bunge, Tent Gen Tamar [Bunge] (1852b) 44.

186

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Fig. 2 Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from China: aef e Tamarix albiflonum; gel e T. austromongolica; mer e T. chinensis; sex e T. leptostachya. aeb, geh, men, set e Light micrographs, scale bar = 200 mm; a, g, m, s e Adaxial epidermis; b, h, n, t e Abaxial epidermis. cef, iel, oer, uex e Scanning electron micrographs, scale bar = 40 mm; c, i, o, u e Adaxial epidermis, inner surface; d, j, p, v e Abaxial epidermis, inner surface; e, k, q, w e Adaxial epidermis, outer surface; f, l, r, x e Abaxial epidermis, outer surface. Arrow 1 e Cells, irregularly arranged; Arrow 2 e A papilla, stout and ball-shaped; Arrow 3 e Epidermal surface, flat, lacking papilla or epidermal hair; Arrow 4 e Cells, elongated, regularly arranged in files; Arrow 5 e Epidermal surface, flat, lacking papilla or epidermal hair; Arrow 6 e A papilla, stout and ball-shaped; Arrow 7 e A papilla, stout and ball-shaped; Arrow 8 e Cell with anticlinal walls, straight or undulated; Arrow 9 e Cells, slightly concave; Arrow 10 e A salt gland, sunken; Arrow 11 e A papilla, stout and ball-shaped, and cell, spindle-shaped.

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

187

Fig. 3 Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from China: aef e Tamarix karelinii; gel e T. hispida; mer e T. ramosissima; sex e T. korolkowi. aeb, geh, men, set e Light micrographs, scale bar = 200 mm; a, g, m, s e Adaxial epidermis; b, h, n, t e Abaxial epidermis. cef, iel, oer, uex e Scanning electron micrographs, scale bar = 40 mm; c, i, o, u e Adaxial epidermis, inner surface; d, j, p, v e Abaxial epidermis, inner surface; e, k, q, w e Adaxial epidermis, outer surface; f, l, r, x e Abaxial epidermis, outer surface. Arrow 1 e A cell, round; Arrow 2 e A cell, concave; Arrow 3 e A papilla, stout; Arrow 4 e A salt gland, sunken; Arrow 5 e A papilla, stout and ball-shaped; Arrow 6 e A cell, concave; Arrow 7 e A long epidermal hair; Arrow 8 e A papilla, elongated to long epidermal hair; Arrow 9 e A cell, anticlinal walls undulated; Arrow 10 e A cell, slightly concave or having straight periclinal walls; Arrow 11 e An epidermal hair; Arrow 12 e A salt gland, raised; Arrow 13 e Swollen epidermal surface, stout and round papillae; Arrow 14 e ‘Wall’-like structure between cell files; Arrow 15 e A cell, anticlinal walls undulated; Arrow 16 e A cell, slightly concave or having straight periclinal walls; Arrow 17 e A salt gland, raised; Arrow 18 e ‘Wall’-like structure occurring between cell files.

188

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Fig. 4 Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from China: aef e Tamarix arceuthoides; gel e T. tarimensis; mer e T. hohenackeri; sex e T. gracilis. aeb, geh, men, set e Light micrographs, scale bar = 200 mm; a, g, m, s e Adaxial epidermis; b, h, n, t e Abaxial epidermis. cef, iel, oer, uex e Scanning electron micrographs, scale bar = 40 mm; c, i, o, u e Adaxial epidermis, inner surface; d, j, p, v e Abaxial epidermis, inner surface; e, k, q, w e Adaxial epidermis, outer surface; f, l, r, x e Abaxial epidermis, outer surface. Arrow 1 e A cell, anticlinal walls straight; Arrow 2 e A cell, slightly concave; Arrow 3 e A salt gland, raised; Arrow 4 e An epidermal hair; Arrow 5 e A cell, surface swollen; Arrow 6 e A cell, anticlinal walls undulated; Arrow 7 e A salt gland, raised; Arrow 8 e A cell, surface swollen; Arrow 9 e A cell, anticlinal walls undulated; Arrow 10 e A short epidermal hair; Arrow 11 e A cell, surface swollen; Arrow 12 e A cell, concave; Arrow 13 e A papilla, stout, round and ball-shaped; Arrow 14 e A salt gland, sunken; Arrow 15 e A wedge-shaped cell, surface flat, lacking papilla or epidermal hair.

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

189

Fig. 5 Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from China: aef e Tamarix gansuensis. aeb e Light micrographs, scale bar = 200 mm; a e Adaxial epidermis; b e Abaxial epidermis. cef e Scanning electron micrographs, scale bar = 40 mm; c e Adaxial epidermis, inner surface; d e Abaxial epidermis, inner surface; e e Adaxial epidermis, outer surface; f e Abaxial epidermis, outer surface. Arrow 1 e A cell, anticlinal walls undulated; Arrow 2 e A cell, slightly concave, having a pit on the periclinal wall; Arrow 3 e An epidermal hair; Arrow 4 e A salt gland, sunken; Arrow 5 e A cell, surface swollen.

4.3. Key to the species of the genus Tamarix from China 1a. Flowers four-merous; adaxial epidermis papillate, papillae stout or slender; abaxial epidermis flat, papilla or epidermal hair absent 2a. Adaxial epidermis composed of cells with undulated anticlinal walls, papillae on adaxial epidermis slender……………..1. T. androssowii 2b. Adaxial epidermis composed of cells with straight anticlinal walls, papillae on adaxial epidermis stout 3a. Cells on adaxial epidermis short, round or isodiametric…………………2. T. elongata 3b. Cells on adaxial epidermis quadrangular, elongated…………………………3. T. laxa 1b. Flowers five-merous; adaxial epidermis strongly papillate or not, epidermal hair long or short; abaxial epidermis flat or papillate, epidermal hair long or short 4a. Abaxial epidermis flat, papillae or epidermal hairs absent 5a. Adaxial epidermis flat, papillae or epidermal hairs absent…………..4. T. taklamakanensis 5b. Adaxial epidermis papillate, papillae stout and ball-shaped, cells irregularly arranged…...…………………5. T. albiflonum 5c. Adaxial epidermis papillate, papillae elongated to epidermal hairs, cells regularly arranged…..…6. T. austromongolica 4b. Abaxial epidermis swollen, papillate or epidermal hairs present

6a. Papillae on adaxial epidermis stout and ball-shaped, not elongated 7a. Abaxial epidermis clearly swollen and densely papillate 8a. Cells on abaxial epidermis quadrangular or polygonal….7. T. chinensis 8b. Cells on abaxial epidermis spindleshaped…………..8. T. leptostachya 7b. Abaxial epidermis comparatively flat, sparsely papillate……….9. T. karelinii 6b. Papillae on adaxial epidermis elongated to long or short hairs 9a. Both adaxial and abaxial epidermis covered with long epidermal hairs… ……………………………10. T. hispida 9b. Adaxial epidermis covered with short epidermal hairs, abaxial epidermis by stout, ball-shaped papillae 10a. ‘Wall’-like structure between cell files present on abaxial epidermis...11a. T. ramosissima var. ramosissima 10b. ‘Wall’-like structure between cell files absent on abaxial epidermis 11a. Cells on adaxial epidermis with straight anticlinal walls…11b. T. ramosissima var. tarimensis 11b. Cells on adaxial epidermis with undulated anticlinal walls

190

Table 3 Foliar, floral and fruit characters of Tamarix species from China (Liu et al., 2012; Yang and Gaskin, 2007). Species

Petal

Raceme length (cm)

T. elongata

ApreMay

6e15

Obovate

T. laxa

MareApr

4

T. androssowii

ApreMay

2e3

Oblong to obovate Obovate

T. taklamakanensis

AugeSep

5e7

Obovate

T. albiflonum

MayeSep

4e5

Obovate

T. austromongolica

MayeSep

3e4

T. chinensis

ApreSep

3e6

T. leptostachya

JuneJul

4e12

Obovate to oblong Ovate to elliptic Obovate

T. karelinii

JuleSep

5e15

T. hispida

JuleSep

5e7

T. ramosissima

MayeSep

3e4

T. korolkowi

MayeSep

2.5e3

T. tarimensis

JuneSep

3e5

T. arceuthoides

MayeSep

4e5

T. hohenackeri

MayeAug

3e5

T. gracilis

MayeAug

2e5

T. gansuensis

ApreMay

6e8

Shape

Obovate to elliptic Obovate to oblong Obovate to elliptic e Obovate to oblong Obovate to elliptic Ovate to elliptic Obovate to orbicular Obovate to oblong

Open

Sepal Length (mm)

Persistence

2e2.5

Deciduous

Ovate

e

2

Deciduous

Ovate

e

1e1.5

Mostly persistent

Ovate

e

3e4

Deciduous

Ovate

e

e

Deciduous

e

e

e

Persistent

Ovate

e

2

Persistent

0.8e1.3

1.5

Deciduous

Narrowly ovate Ovate

1.5 1.5e2

Partly deciduous Deciduous

1e1.7

Persistent

e

Persistent

Half open, incurved Open

1.5e2 1e1.7

Mostly persistent Deciduous

Half open, incurved Open, reflexed e

1.5e2

Persistent

2.5e3

Deciduous

2

Partly deciduous

Open, reflexed Open, reflexed Half open, incurved open, reflexed Open Open, reflexed Open, reflexed Open, reflexed Half open, incurved Open, reflexed Half open, incurved e

Shape

Bract Length (mm)

Shape

Leaf (growing branch) Shape

Length (mm)

3e6

4e6

Linear to lanceolate

4e9

e

3e4

Lanceolate to ovate

1e2

Oblong to ovate

0.7e1

4e5

Sub-amplexicaul

e

Triangular to ovate Lanceolate

0.9

5e7

Amplexicaul

1

e

e

1e2

e

5

e

e

Oblong to lanceolate

1.5e1.8

0.5e0.6

Linear to lanceolate Linear to oblong Subulate

Semi-amplexicaul, ovate-lanceolate Ovate to lanceolate

1.2

4e5

e

Suborbicular

0.8

Lanceolate

1.7e2

5e6

Ovate to orbicular Ovate

0.7e1

Narrowly lanceolate Ovate to lanceolate Lanceolate

1e1.5

4e5

1.5e2

3e5

1

e

Ovate to lanceolate Ovate to subulate Linear to oblong Spatulate

e

4

1e1.5

3e4

1e2

4e5

1.5e2

4e7

1.5e2

e

Semi-amplexicaul, ovate-lanceolate Semi-amplexicaul, ovate Semi-amplexicaul, ovate-lanceolate Semi-amplexicaul, lanceolate-ovate Semi-amplexicaul, oblong-ovate Semi-amplexicaul, triangular-ovate Semi-amplexicaul, triangular-ovate Semi-amplexicaul, ovate-lanceolate Semi-amplexicaul, lanceolate Semi-amplexicaul, lanceolate

0.5e0.7

Ovate to triangular Ovate

e

Ovate to triangular Ovate to orbicular Triangular to ovate Ovate to orbicular

0.5e0.7

e

1 1 1

Linear to lanceolate Ovate

Length (mm)

Capsule length (mm)

Ovate to lanceolate

2e3

1e1.5 0.8e2.2 2e5 e 1 1e2 2e3.5 4 2e6

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Blooming time

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

191

12a. Epidermal hairs on adaxial epidermis clearly elongated… 11c. T. ramosissima var. arceuthoides 12b. Epidermal hairs on adaxial epidermis not clearly elongated………11d. T. ramosissima var. hohenackeri

epidermis (Fig. 2e and 2k), while the abaxial epidermis lacks papillae or epidermal hairs (Fig. 2f and l). They are likely to be more evolved than T. taklamakanensis (Table 4). In T. chinensis, T. leptostachya and T. karelinii, the papillae occur on both adaxial and abaxial epidermis (Figs. 2q, r, w, x and 3e, f), so they are more evolved than T. albiflonum and T. austromongolica (Table 4). T. ramosissima is considered to be highly evolved compared to the above three species, because their papillae on the adaxial epidermis have elongated (Table 4; Fig. 3q). Similarly, in the species with a four-merous flower, T. elongata and T. laxa would be more evolved than T. androssowii according to the distinct and stout papillae on the adaxial epidermis (Table 4; Fig. 1e and k), since the papillae in T. androssowii are slender and small (Fig. 1q). As discussed above, the epidermal characters of T. gracilis and T. gansuensis are intermediate between species with a four-merous flower and those with a five-merous flower. T. gracilis has stout and ballshaped papillae on the adaxial epidermis, but its abaxial epidermis is flat (Fig. 4w and x); while T. gansuensis bears obvious epidermal hairs or papillae on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis (Fig. 5e and f). Accordingly, T. gansuensis seems to be the more evolved species (Table 4).

1c. Flowers four-merous and five-merous, epidermal characters lying between four-merous species and five-merous species 13a. Papillae on adaxial epidermis stout and ballshaped; abaxial epidermis flat, cells wedgeshaped……………………………12. T. gracilis 13b. Papillae on adaxial epidermis elongated to short hairs, abaxial epidermis swollen, cells round…………………………13. T. gansuensis Thus, based on our studies, the features of flowers in combination with the leaf epidermal characters show clear taxonomical differentiation. New taxonomical evidence shows the occurrence of 13 species and four variants of the genus Tamarix in China.

4.4.

Systematic implication

Although the plants of Tamarix from China are mainly distributed in cool, arid or semi-arid areas, their ancestors from the coastal areas of the ancient Mediterranean Sea probably lived in warm and humid climates during the Eocene (Zhang et al., 2003a). Papillae or epidermal hairs, which are outgrowths of the outer epidermal cells and facilitate leaves to respond to the water stress, are commonly seen in plants growing in arid or semi-arid areas in contrast to plants growing in warm and humid climates (Evert, 2006; Ferris et al., 1996; Glover, 2010). In Tamarix, they are of relatively recent origin. Thus, primitive species lack or have fewer papillae or epidermal hairs, while the more evolved species likely possess these structures abundantly. Of the species with a five-merous flower, T. taklamakanensis lacks papillae or epidermal hairs on both adaxial and abaxial epidermis (Fig. 1w and x), and would be the most primitive one; while T. hispida has the leaf covered with long epidermal hairs on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis (Fig. 3k and l), and would be the most evolved species. T. albiflonum and T. austromongolica have papillae on the adaxial

4.5. Phylogenetic relationships between species of Tamarix from China Based on previous studies (e.g., Baum, 1978; Zhang et al., 2003a), the species of Tamarix which have only four-merous flowers are more evolved than those which have only five-merous flowers, and the species which have both four-merous and five-merous flowers are considered to be transitional types from the fivemerous to the four-merous stage. In order to gain a clear understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of the species in China, a cladistic analysis based on the epidermal characters (Tables 5 and 6) for the 13 species of the genus has been performed using SPSS 17.0 (Fig. 6).

4.6. Ecological and palaeogeographic implications As a typical old-world temperate genus, the present distribution of Tamarix is discontinuous, mainly in the arid and semiarid regions around the coast of the ancient Mediterranean Sea and in the central Asia; some of the species are also found in the southwestern Africa, southern India and eastern Asia. Thus, although the earliest fossils of the genus were considered to

192

Table 4 Systematic implication of Chinese Tamarix based on leaf epidermal characters. Flower merous 5

4 and 5

4

Abaxial epidermis

Adaxial epidermis

Additional characters

Distribution Xinjiang, Gansu (China) Xinjiang (China) Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Shannxi, Shanxi, Hebei, Henan, Shandong (China) Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia (China); Afghanistan, Mongolia, Russia, Southwest Asia Liaoning, Hebei, Henan, Shandong, Jiangsu, Anhui (China) Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia (China); Mongolia, Central Asia Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia (China); Afghanistan, Mongolia, CentraleSouthwest Asia, East Europe Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia (China); Afghanistan, Mongolia, CentraleSouthwest Asia Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia (China); Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Southwest Asia Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia (China) Xinjiang, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia (China); Mongolia, Central Asia Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Shannxi (China); Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russia, Turkmenistan, Southwest Asia Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia (China); Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan

Papillae absent Papillae absent Papillae absent

Papillae absent Papillae conspicuous, stout Papillae conspicuous, hair-like

No No No

T. taklamakanensis T. albiflonum T. austromongolica

Papillae inconspicuous

Papillae conspicuous, stout

No

T. karelinii

Papillae conspicuous

Papillae conspicuous, stout

T. chinensis

Papillae conspicuous

Papillae conspicuous, stout

Cells polygonal on abaxial epidermis Cells spindle-shaped on abaxial epidermis

Papillae conspicuous

Epidermal hairs conspicuous

No

T. ramosissima

Epidermal hairs conspicuous

Epidermal hairs conspicuous

No

T. hispida

Papillae absent

Papillae conspicuous

No

T. gracilis

Papillae present

Epidermal hairs conspicuous

No

T. gansuensis

Papillae absent

Papillae inconspicuous

No

T. androssowii

Papillae absent

Papillae conspicuous

No

T. laxa

Papillae absent

Papillae conspicuous

No

T. elongata

T. leptostachya

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Tamarix species

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China Table 5 Characters and character states of Chinese Tamarix species. Number

Structure

1

Flower merous

2

3

Characters

States Weighting

Five-merous Four-and-five-merous Four-merous Abaxial Papillae absent epidermis Papillae inconspicuous Papillae conspicuous Papillae or epidermal hairs conspicuous Epidermal hairs conspicuous Adaxial Papillae absent epidermis Papillae inconspicuous Papillae conspicuous Papillae or epidermal hairs conspicuous Epidermal hairs conspicuous

1 2 3 1 2 3 4

×10 ×10 ×10 ×2 ×2 ×2 ×2

5

×2

1 2 3 4

×2 ×2 ×2 ×2

5

×2

Table 6 Data matrix for character states of Chinese Tamarix species. Tamarix species

T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

taklamakanensis albiflonum austromongolica karelinii chinensis leptostachya ramosissima hispida gracilis gansuensis androssowii laxa elongata

Character states 1

2

3

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 30 30 30

2 2 2 4 6 6 6 10 2 6 2 2 2

2 6 8 6 6 6 10 10 6 10 4 6 6

stem from the early Oligocene of Egypt (Tamaricoxylon €usel) Boureau) (Baum et al., 1970; africanum (Kra Monique and Jean, 1995), according to the palaeogeographic pattern and the primitive characters of the group in India, the ancestors of the genus Tamarix are thought to have originated in the Eocene of the Tethys area and lived in warm and humid environments (Li et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2003a). In China, fossils of Tamarix are scarce. Spores from the Tertiary of Gansu Province were thought to be the earliest records (Jiang and Yang, 1980; Sung, 1958), but the taxonomic position of these fossils was doubted because of the morphological similarities to

193

the Salicaceae (Zhang et al., 2003a). Based on phytogeographical studies, the first appearance of the genus Tamarix in China was at least in the late Miocene, accompanied by the uplift of the QinghaieTibet Plateau and the disappearance of the Tethys (Zhang et al., 2003a). Thus, the abundant papillae or epidermal hairs in leaves of the Chinese species were probably of relatively recent origin, and were acquired as adaptation to the arid or semi-arid environments in the Late Cenozoic of northwestern China. These ecological adaptations of the epidermal features made it easy to speculate that the density of papillae or the length of epidermal hairs in Tamarix species are closely related to the environments in which they live. Species with lower papilla density or shorter epidermal hairs are found to be living in more humid and warmer climates, while species with greater papilla density or longer epidermal hairs are found to be living in more arid and harder climatic conditions. Our conclusions are consistent with the study of Li et al. (2007), in which they inferred that from its leaf epidermal features the Japanese honeysuckle has a stronger drought-resistance and uses water more efficiently than the wild honeysuckle, because the Japanese honeysuckle has more epidermal hairs on the lower epidermis, which could form a relatively airproof space and reduce water loss from stomata under severe water deficit conditions. The lower epidermis of the Japanese honeysuckle is an efficient water trap. Ecological or palaeogeographic features of Tamarix in the Late Cenozoic of Northwest China can thus be determined on the basis of abundance of papillae or length of epidermal hairs on the surface of leaves. Among the species of Tamarix in China, T. taklamakanensis, which is now distributed in the Tarim Basin (Taklamakan desert and Kumtag desert) of Xinjiang and the Dunhuang City of Gansu (Liu et al., 2012; Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Table 4), lacks papillae or epidermal hairs on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis; while T. hispida, which is distributed in the desert areas of Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia (Liu et al., 2012; Yang and Gaskin, 2007; Table 4), has long epidermal hairs on both the adaxial and abaxial epidermis. We infer that the palaeoecological or palaeogeographic conditions in the Late Neocene of the Tarim Basin and Dunhuang, where T. taklamakanensis is now found, were characterized by a predominantly warmer and more humid climate than the areas where T. hispida are found.

194

J.-W. Zhang et al.

Fig. 6 Dendrogram of Chinese Tamarix species based on epidermal characters.

Acknowledgements This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant 41271070 and the West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant 2015-XBQN-B-25. The authors thank Prof. Kai-Yun Guan for the coordination of plant collections, Dr. Ya Li and Dr. Mei-Lin Yang for providing some references, Dr. Ru Feng for technical help, and the Lab Center of Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for preparing the experiments.

References
, R.A., Angelaccio, C., Abbruzzese, G., Kuzminsky, E., Jaoude Eshel, A., Scoppola, A., Valentini, R., 2013. Leaf epidermis morphological differentiation between Tamarix africana Poir. and Tamarix gallica L. (Tamaricaceae) with ecological remarks. Plant Biosyststems, 147, 573e582. Alaimo, M.G., Gargano, M.L., Vizzi, D., Venturella, G., 2013. Leaf anatomy in Tamarix arborea var. arborea (Tamaricaceae). Plant Biosyststems, 147, 21e24. Alvin, K.L., Boulter, M.C., 1974. A controlled method of comparative study of taxodiaceous cuticles. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 69, 277e286. Baranova, M., 1987. Historical development of the present classification of morphological type of stomates. Botanical Review, 53, 53e79. Baranova, M., 1992. Principles of comparative stomatographic studies of flowering plants. Botanical Review, 58, 1e99.

Baum, B.R., 1978. The Genus Tamarix. Jerusalem Academic Press, Jerusalem. Baum, B.R., Bassett, I.J., Crompton, C.W., 1970. Pollen morphology and its relationships to taxonomy and distri€ bution of Tamarix, series Vaginantes. Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 118, 182e188. Boissier, E., 1867. Flora Orientalis 1. Basel Geneva, pp. 763e779. Bunge, A., 1851. Alexandri Lehmann Reliquiae Botanicae.
moires de L'Acade
mie Impe
riale des Sciences de St. Me Petersbourg. Divers Savans, 7, pp. 290e296. Bunge, A., 1852a. Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Flora Russlands und der Steppen Central-Asiens, 119 pp. Bunge, A., 1852b. Tentamen Generís Tamaricum Species Accuratius Definíendi. Dorpat, 44 pp. Cheng, Z.M., Pan, H.X., Yin, L.K., 2000. Study on the phytochemistry taxonomy of Tamarix Linn and Myricaria Desv. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 20, 275e282 (in Chinese with English abstract). Evert, R.F., 2006. Esau's Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function, and Development, third ed. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. Feng, Y., Yin, L.K., 2000. Study on organs morphology and its taxonomic significance of Tamarix L. Arid Zone Research, 17, 40e45 (in Chinese with English abstract). Ferris, R., Nijs, I., Behaeghe, T., Impens, I., 1996. Elevated CO2 and temperature have different on leaf anatomy of perennial ryegrass in spring and summer. Annals of Botany, 78, 489e497. Gaskin, J.F., Ghahremani-Nejad, F., Zhang, D.Y., Jason, P.L.A., 2004. A systematic overview of Frankeniaceae and Tamaricaceae from nuclear DNA and plastid sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 91, 401e409. Glover, B.J., 2010. Epidermis: Outer Cell Layer of the Plant (Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS)). John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.

Leaf epidermal characters of Tamarix from northwest China

195

Gupta, A.K., Murty, Y.S., 1984. The leaf epidermal structures in Tamaricaceae. Acta Botanica Indica, 12, 200e204. Hua, L., Zhang, D.Y., Pan, B.R., 2004. Molecular systematics of Tamarix and Myricaria in China inferred from ITS Sequence data. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 26, 283e289 (in Chinese with English abstract). Jiang, D.X., Yang, H.Q., 1980. Petroleum spore-pollen assemblages and oil source rock of Yumen oil-bearing region in Gansu. Acta Botanica Sinica, 22, 280e285 (in Chinese with English abstract). Jones, J.H., 1986. Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 73, 228e275. Kerp, H., 1990. The study of fossil gymnosperms by means of cuticular analysis. Palaios, 5, 548e569.
, R.A., Abbruzzese, G., Kuzminsky, E., Angelis, P.D., Jaoude Terzoli, S., Angelaccio, C., Giovanbattista, D.D., Monteverdi, M.C., Valentini, R., 2014. Biodiversity of Italian Tamarix spp. populations: Their potential as environmental and productive resources. Rendiconti Lincei, 25, 439e452. Ledebour, C.F., Meyer, C.A., Bunge, A., 1829. Flora Altaica 1. Berlin, pp. 421e426. Li, Q., Yu, L.J., Deng, Y., Li, W., Li, M.T., Cao, J.H., 2007. Leaf epidermal characters of Lonicera japonica and L. confusa and their ecology adaptation. Journal of Forest Research, 18, 103e108 (in Chinese with English abstract). Li, Z.H., Chen, J., Zhao, G.F., Guo, Y.P., Kou, Y.X., Ma, Y.Z., Wang, G., Ma, X.F., 2012. Response of a desert shrub to past geological and climate change: A phylogeographic study of Reaumuria soongarica (Tamaricaceae) in western China. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 50, 351e361. Liu, M.T., 1994. Species and its distribution of Tamarix L. from China. Xinjiang Forest Research, 1, 31e34 (in Chinese with English abstract). Liu, M.T., Liu, D.X., Liu, Q.H., 2012. Atlas of Comprehensive Research on the Genus Tamarix L. From China. Xinjiang Science and Technology Press, Urumqi (in Chinese with English abstract). Loureiro, J.D., 1790. Flora Cochinchinensis: Sistens Plantas in Regno Cochinchina Nascentes. Quibus Accedunt Aliae Observatae in Senensi Imperio, Africa Orientalis, Indiaeque Locis Variis. Tomus I. Academia Real das Sciencias, Lisbon. Monique, D.L., Jean, D., 1995. Inventory of Mesozoic and Cenozoic woods from Equatorial and North Equatorial Africa. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 84, 439e480. Pan, B.R., 1998. The diversity of the Tamaricaceae in China and its conservation strategy. In: Chen, Y. (Ed.), Biological Diversity and the Future of Human Beings, Proceeding of the Second National Symposium on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity. Chinese Forestry Press, Beijing, pp. 114e122 (in Chinese with English abstract). Sung, Z.C., 1958. Tertiary spore and pollen complexes from the red beds of Chiuchuan, Kansu and their geological and botanical significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 6, 159e167 (in Chinese with English abstract).

Villar, J.L., Alonso, M.A., Juan, A., Gaskin, J.F., Crespo, M.B., 2014. Proposal to conserve the name Tamarix ramosissima against T. pentandra (Tamaricaceae). Taxon, 63, 1140e1141. Wang, L.T., Yin, L.K., 2004. Biodiversity and protection strategy of Tamaricaceae of Jungar basin in Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 18, 139e145 (in Chinese with English abstract). Wang, Y.H., Lu, L., Fritsch, P.W., Wang, H., Wang, Y.H., Li, D.Z., 2015. Leaf epidermal character variation and evolution in Gaultherieae (Ericaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 178, 686e710. Wei, Y., Tan, D.Y., Yin, L.K., 1999. The discussions on the anatomical structure of leaf and its taxonomic relationship of Tamaricaceae in China. Acta Botanica BorealiOccidentalia Sinica, 19, 113e118 (in Chinese with English abstract). Xi, Y.Z., 1988. Studies on pollen morphology of Tamaricaceae in China. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 8, 23e42 (in Chinese with English abstract). Xun, S.H., Qiao, L.Q., Kang, Z., He, H.B., Chen, J.X., 2007. Research progress on germplasm resource and propagation technology of Tamarix L. in China. Journal of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University Natural Science Edition, 35, 97e102 (in Chinese with English abstract). Yang, Q., Gaskin, J., 2007. Tamarix. In: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. (Eds.), Flora of China, Volume 13. Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing/St. Louis, pp. 59e65. Yang, W.K., Zhang, D.Y., Yin, L.K., Zhang, L.Y., 2002. Distribution and cluster analysis on the similarity of the Tamarix communities in Xinjiang. Arid Zone Research, 19, 6e11 (in Chinese with English abstract). Yin, L.K., 1995. Tamarix spp., the keystone species of desert ecosystem. Arid Zone Research, 12, 43e47 (in Chinese with English abstract). Yin, L.K., 2002. The ex-situ protection and the ecological adaptability of Tamarix L. in China. Arid Zone Research, 19, 12e16 (in Chinese with English abstract). Yin, L.K., Yang, W.K., 1998. An evaluation of the plant resources and diversity of Tamaricaceae in China. Proceedings of the International Conference on Desert Technology 4, New Technologies for Sustainable Production in Arid Areas. Journal of Arid Land Studies, 7, 201e204 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhai, S.H., Li, M.X., 1986. Chromosome number of Tamarix L. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 24, 273e274 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhai, S.H., Wang, C.G., Gao, X.Z., 1983. Morphological and anatomical observations of clasping leaves of Tamarix L. Acta Botanica Sinica, 25, 519e525 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, D.Y., 2004a. A cladistics analysis of Tamarix from China. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 26, 275e282 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, D.Y., 2005. Discuss on some systematical problems of Tamaricaceae. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 27, 471e478 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, D.Y., Chen, Z.D., Sun, H.Y., Yin, L.K., Pan, B.R., 2000. Systematic studies on some questions of Tamaricaceae based on ITS sequence. Acta Botanica Boreali-

196 Occidentalia Sinica, 20, 421e431 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, D.Y., Pan, B.R., Yin, L.K., 2003a. The photogeographical studies of Tamarix (Tamaricaceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 25, 415e427 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, D.Y., Tan, D.Y., Zhang, J., Pan, B.R., 2003b. Comparative anatomy of Yong Branches of 16 species of Tamarix from China with reference to their ecological significance. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 25, 653e662 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, D.Y., Yin, L.K., Pan, B.R., 2002. A review on the systematics study of Tamarix L. Arid Zone Research, 19, 41e46 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, P.Y., Liu, M.T., 1988. Four new species of Tamarix from China. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 8, 263 (in Chinese with English abstract).

J.-W. Zhang et al. Zhang, P.Y., Zhang, Y.J., 1990. Tamaricaceae. In: Li, H.W. (Ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (FRPS), Tomus 50(2). Science Press, Beijing, pp. 142e177 (in Chinese). Zhang, Y.M., 2004b. Cluster analysis on pollen morphology of the Tamaricaceae from China. Acta Botanica BorealiOccidentalia Sinica, 24, 1702e1707 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, Y.M., Pan, B.R., Yin, L.K., 1998. Seed morphology of Tamaricaceae in China arid areas and its systematic evolution. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 7, 22e27 (in Chinese with English abstract). Zhang, Y.M., Pan, B.R., Yin, L.K., 2001. Pollen morphology of the Tamaricaceae from China and its taxonomic significance. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 21, 857e864 (in Chinese with English abstract).