Accepted Manuscript Epididymal α-L-fucosidase and its possible role in remodelling the surface of bull spermatozoa Andrea Carolina Aguilera, Veronica Boschin, Inmaculada Robina, Pilar ElíasRodríguez, Miguel Angel Sosa PII:
S0093-691X(17)30401-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.08.016
Reference:
THE 14236
To appear in:
Theriogenology
Received Date: 9 April 2017 Revised Date:
7 August 2017
Accepted Date: 13 August 2017
Please cite this article as: Aguilera AC, Boschin V, Robina I, Elías-Rodríguez P, Sosa MA, Epididymal α-L-fucosidase and its possible role in remodelling the surface of bull spermatozoa, Theriogenology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.08.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Revised
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Running head: α-L-fucosidase in bull epididymis
2
Epididymal α-L-fucosidase and its possible role in remodeling the surface of bull spermatozoa
4 5 6
Andrea Carolina Aguileraa,b, Veronica Boschina, Inmaculada Robinac, Pilar Elías-Rodríguez c and Miguel Angel Sosaa,b.
11 12
Histología y Embriología – IHEM-CONICET-FCM-UNCuyo. 5500- Mendoza, Argentina. b
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo.
Mendoza, Argentina
13
c
14
Sevilla. Spain.
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
(‡) Correspondence: Dr. Miguel A. Sosa, IHEM-CONICET, Telephone: +54
EP
16
Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de
216 4135000 (extension 2677), E-mail:
[email protected].
AC C
15
M AN U
10
Laboratorio de Biología y Fisiología Celular “Dr. Franciso Bertini”. Instituto de
TE D
9
a
SC
7 8
RI PT
3
Key words: α-L-fucosidase, bull epididymis, glycosidases, spermatozoa. α
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 25
Abstract The mammalian epididymis provides an appropriate environment for sperm
26
maturation. During the epididymal transit, spermatozoa undergo biochemical and
28
morphological changes that lead to the acquisition of the fertilizing capacity. In this
29
study we analysed the fucosylation status of membrane glycoproteins in the
30
spermatozoa obtained from different regions of the bull epididymis. High amounts of
31
fucose were detected on caput spermatozoa (R.F.I.= 1010 ± 20.35), mostly located in
32
the post-acrosome zone. A significant decrease in the fucose levels was detected
33
toward the cauda (R.F.I.= 540.5 ± 49.93) (P<0.05). This decrease was in line with the
34
increased activity of α-L-fucosidase in the cauda fluid. In sperm from the cauda, the
35
defucosylation occurred in some proteins, whereas others showed higher
36
fucosylation rates. A significant decrease of fucose in the gametes was observed
37
upon incubation of crude cauda fluid with caput spermatozoa (from R.F.I.= 1.45 ±
38
0.08 to 1.06 ± 0.03) (P<0.05) indicating that the α-L-fucosidase present in the
39
epididymal fluid is active on spermatozoa. Moreover, this effect was blocked with
40
specific enzyme inhibitors. These results provide direct evidence that the α-L-
41
fucosidase from epididymal fluid participates in the fucose removal from
42
spermatozoa, as a step of sperm maturation in the bull epididymis.
43 44 45
1.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
27
Introduction
The mammalian epididymis plays an important role in the acquisition of motility
46
and the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa [1]. During the passage through the
47
epididymis, spermatozoa undergo biochemical and morphological changes, resulting
48
in a gamete that is competent for fertilization. These changes include adsorption of
49
epididymal proteins on the sperm surface, a molecular reorganization of the
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 50
plasmalemma and changes in the composition of glycoconjugates on the cell surface
51
[2-7]. Thus, the maturation of spermatozoa in the epididymis is the result of
52
sequential interactions with proteins secreted by the epithelium along the epididymal
53
duct [8-13]. Among the several proteins secreted by the epididymal epithelium, acid
RI PT
54
glycosidases can be found at high concentrations in the epididymal fluid of different
56
mammalian species [2,5,6,14-19]. Although the pH of the epididymal lumen is not
57
optimum for acid hydrolase activity [20], it has been demonstrated that some
58
enzymes, such as β-galactosidase is active in the fluid of the rat epididymis [21].
59
However, other functions for those glycosidases could be attributed from their
60
interaction with specific receptors found in the plasmalemma of spermatozoa [7,22]
M AN U
61
SC
55
Glycosidases have also been found in the epididymis of domestic animals, such as bulls [23]. Among them, α-L-fucosidase (α-FUC) appears to be important for
63
reproduction in bulls, since it was prevalent in the cauda epididymal fluid of highly
64
fertile animals [24]. Moreover, dogs with severe deficiency of α-FUC have shown an
65
impaired sperm maturation [25].
It has been proposed that α-FUC might contribute to modify the carbohydrate
EP
66
TE D
62
moieties of sperm membrane glycoproteins during the epididymal transit; however,
68
this hypothesis remains to be confirmed. Mammalian α-L-fucosidases are a
69
ubiquitous group of a large multimeric lysosomal glycosidases involved in the
70
hydrolysis of α-L-fucose from a diverse group of fucoglycoconjugates [26]. Two
71
isoforms of this enzyme have been described in bull reproductive tissues, although
72
only the FUCA1 isoform has been found in the cauda epididymal fluid, the seminal
73
plasma and spermatozoa [27]. Other studies have suggested that, in other
AC C
67
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 74
mammalian species, the enzyme detected in the epididymal fluid and seminal plasma
75
differs from the sperm membrane-associated enzyme [28-30]. Several studies support the involvement of fucose and/or fucosidases in the
77
fertilization process, indicating that may play an important role in the association to
78
the oviduct to form a sperm reservoir [31-33] or for gamete recognition [28,29,34,35].
79
In addition, the amount of fucose decrease after incubation with oviductal fluid [36].
80
The addition of this monosaccharide to an in vitro fertilization assay inhibits the
81
penetration into bovine oocytes [37]. The α-L-fucosidases are involved in the
82
biosynthesis of fucosylated glycoproteins and, therefore, inhibitors of this enzyme are
83
important tools in the study of fucose-containing glycoconjugates that participate in
84
fertilization processes [29].
M AN U
SC
RI PT
76
Taking in account the importance of fucose after epididymal maturation, the
85
aims of the present study were to determine whether the changes in the fucose
87
content in the sperm surface during the epididymal transit can be taken as a
88
maturation parameter, and if the secreted α-FUC is responsible of such
89
modifications. Herein, we present direct evidences indicating that α-FUC from the
90
cauda epididymal fluid may be responsible for the changes in the carbohydrate
91
composition during sperm maturation in the epididymis.
92
2.
94
EP
AC C
93
TE D
86
Materials and Methods 2.1.
Reagents
The rabbit polyclonal antibody against α-L-fucosidase (FUCA 1) was
95
purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-134716). The FITC-conjugated UEA-I
96
(cat.L9006) and biotin-conjugated UEA-I (L8262) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
97
(St. Louis, MO). The p-nitrophenyl-α-L-fucopyranoside substrate for α-fucosidase
98
(Cat. No. 3628) was also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO).
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 99
Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes (pore size 0.45 µm) were purchased from GE Healthcare (Germany). The chemiluminescent reagent was prepared with 1.25 mM
101
luminol (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and 198 µM p-coumaric acid in 100 mM Tris-
102
HCl (pH 8.5) according to Mruk and Cheng [38]. The α-L-fucosidase inhibitors, such
103
as (2S,3S,4R,5S)-2-(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)-5-methylpyrrolidine-3,4-diol (C1),
104
(2S,3S,4R,5S)-2-[1-((4-benzyloxycarbonyl-5-methylfuran-2-yl)-methyl)-1H-1,2,3-
105
triazol-4-yl]-5-methylpyrrolidine-3,4-diol (C2) [39] and (2S,3S,4R,5S)-2-(1H-
106
benzoimidazol-2-yl)-5-methylpyrrolidine-3,4-diol (C3) [40, 41] were provided by Dr.
107
Inmaculada Robina (University of Seville, Spain). All the inhibitors are five membered
108
iminosugars (pyrrolidines) having an L-fuco configuration, and bearing an aromatic
109
moiety attached at carbon 2 of the pyrrolidine backbone.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
100
110
2.2.
Animals
111
Reproductively mature bulls (Aberdeen-Angus, ∼4 years old) were used in this study. The animal’s fertility was certified by the supplying farms, where they had
113
been used for reproductive purposes. Bulls were fed with diets primarily composed of
114
pasture provided by farms located in the province of Córdoba (Argentina). All the
115
procedures were performed according to the protocol approved by CICUAL
116
(Commitee for Animal Care of the Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza,
117
Argentina). These procedures also fulfilled the policies and regulations of the
118
Argentine National Institute of Health and the National Research Council.
120
EP
AC C
119
TE D
112
2.3.
Biological samples
All procedures were carried out according to Aguilera et al. [7]. Briefly, after
121
slaughtering, epididymides were removed and transported to the laboratory and
122
processed immediately. Organs (one per animal) were carefully dissected and the
123
caput, corpus and cauda were processed separately. To obtain epididymal tissue
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and spermatozoa, each organ (the three regions) was cut into small pieces with a
125
stainless steel blade. Samples were suspended (1:3 w/v) in Hank´s solution.
126
Incubations were carried out, at 37 ºC for 30 min with gentle manual agitation to
127
allow for spermatozoa release. The minced tissue was settled for 10 min at 4 ºC and
128
the resulting supernatant (containing fluid and spermatozoa) was centrifuged at 400 x
129
g for 5 min and spermatozoa were separated from the fluid. The spermatozoa were
130
washed three times with Hank´s solution and finally pelleted at 1000 x g for 10 min.
131
The epididymal fluids were stored at -20 °C until u sed. The remaining epididymal
132
tissue was homogenized with buffer H (10 mM Tris–acetate, pH 7.2, containing 0.25
133
M sucrose, 1% EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 0.02% sodium azide, and 5 mM
134
glycerophosphate) employing a Teflon/glass tissue homogenizer and centrifuged at
135
800 x g for 20 min at 4ºC. The post-nuclear supernatant was stored at -20ºC until
136
used.
137
2.4.
138
All the procedures were carried out according to Aguilera et al. [19]. Briefly, 45
TE D
Immunoblotting
M AN U
SC
RI PT
124
µg of proteins from the epididymal tissue or fluid were run on SDS–PAGE gels (10%
140
acrylamide/bisacrilamide) and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose (NC) membranes at
141
250 V for 1 h. After transferring, the non-specific binding sites were blocked for 1 h
142
with 6 % skimmed milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20
143
(PBS-T). Membranes were then washed three times with PBS-T and incubated for 2
144
h with anti-FUCA 1 diluted 1:250 in PBS-T. Membranes were washed and incubated
145
with the biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG antiserum (diluted 1:5000 in PBS-T) for 2 h. After
146
washing as above, NC membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated
147
streptavidin (1:10000 in PBS-T) for 1 h and washed again. Specific bands were
148
detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence method, and quantified by
AC C
EP
139
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 149
densitometric scanning of membranes using an Image Quant LAS 4000 scanner (GE
150
Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). NC membranes were stained with Ponceau S as
151
loading and transference controls. 2.5.
Detection of fucose on nitrocellulose immobilized glycoproteins
153
Proteins from caput or cauda sperm membrane were extracted with a
154
hypoosmotic solution according to Jeyendran et.al. [42]. Briefly, spermatozoa (up to
155
1x107spermatozoa/ml) were mixed with a hypoosmotic solution (25 mM sodium
156
citrate dihydrate and 75 mM fructose) and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Gametes were
157
sonicated over ice until spermatozoa tails were separated from the rest of the cell
158
and centrifuged at 4000 g for 15 min. Pellets, corresponding to intact spermatozoa,
159
were discarded and the supernatants (SN1) were centrifuged at 10000 x g for 30
160
min. Pellets (enriched-membrane fractions) were resuspended in 0.05 M Tris-HCl
161
buffer (pH 7.2), containing 0.5% saponin, 50 mM EDTA and 1 mM PMSF. Proteins
162
(45 µg) were run on 10% SDS-PAGE gels under non-reducing conditions and
163
electrotransferred to NC membranes for 90 min at 250 V. After transferring, non-
164
specific binding sites were blocked for 1 h with 6% skimmed milk in PBS-T.
165
Membranes were then washed three times with PBS-T and incubated for 2 h with the
166
biotin-conjugated lectin UEA-I (5 µg/ml in PBS-T). Membranes were washed as
167
described above and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (1:10000 in
168
PBS-T) for 1 h. After washing with PBS-T, the lectin-reactive bands were detected
169
with the enhanced chemiluminescence method and quantified by densitometric
170
scanning on the membranes using an Image Quant LAS 4000 scanner.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
152
171
2.6.
Fluorescence microscopy
172
To evaluate the fucose amount on the sperm surface, the spermatozoa
173
obtained from caput and cauda (as described above) were resuspended in PBS/PVP
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (0.1% polyvinylpyrrolidone in PBS) and fixed with 2 % p-formaldehyde (PAF) in PBS
175
for 10 min. Cells were then placed on slides (previously treated with 10 mM poly-
176
lysine for 30 min) to perform the immunofluorescence method. To this end, slides
177
containing spermatozoa were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5 % horse
178
serum in PBS/PVP and then incubated with 100 µl UEA-I lectin (10 µg/ml) in
179
PBS/PVP containing 1% horse serum. After three washes with PBS/PVP, slides were
180
mounted on glass coverslip with UltraCruzTM mounting medium (USA). Slides were
181
then examined with in a Nikon 80 fluorescence microscope (Japan).
SC
RI PT
174
2.7.
Flow cytometry
183
Gametes from caput and cauda were washed three times with Hank’s buffer
M AN U
182
and centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 min. Samples were fixed with 2% PAF in PBS/PVP
185
for 10 min at room temperature and then blocked for 1 h at 37 °C with 5 % horse
186
serum (in PBS/PVP) and washed three times with PBS/PVP. Each sample (5 x 105
187
cells) was incubated with FITC-conjugated UEA-I (5 µg/ml) in 100 µl final volume for
188
2 h at room temperature in the dark. The specificity of lectin binding was controlled
189
by incubation in the presence of 0.5 M fucose. The sugar concentration was
190
determined in previous experiments. Gametes were then washed twice with
191
PBS/PVP, and the number of the lectin reactive sperm was analyzed on a BD
192
FACSAria III (USA) flow cytometer and the FACS Diva Software. In all cases, a gate
193
was established using dots plots of forward scatter (FSC) vs. side scatter (SSC)
194
plots, since the same cellular and physical properties (size and granularity) was
195
obtained for all treatments. After excitation at 488 nm, the emission was detected
196
employing a 525 nm band pass filter. The percentage of the spermatozoa that
197
reacted with FITC-conjugated lectins and the mean fluorescence intensity was
198
analyzed using the FlowJo software version 7.6.2.
AC C
EP
TE D
184
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 199
2.8.
Incubation of caput sperm with cauda fluid
200
Caput spermatozoa were obtained as described above and the crude cauda epididymal fluid was obtained by gentle retrograde perfusion with Hank’s buffer from
202
the deferent duct until a drop with the luminal content was observed. Four drops of
203
each epididymis were collected in Eppendorf tubes. After centrifugation at 2000 rpm,
204
supernatants were recovered and used in the assay. For the assay, gametes were
205
previously washed three times with Hank’s buffer at 33 °C. Spermatozoa (5 x 10 5
206
cells) were then mixed with 100 µl of the crude epididymal fluid and incubated for 3 h
207
at 33 °C. To confirm the enzyme specificity, the as says were carried out in the
208
presence of the following FUCA 1 inhibitors at the final concentrations of 0.75 mM of
209
the benzyltriazole pyrrolidine (C1), 0.1 mM of the benzyloxicarbonyl triazole
210
pyrrolidine (C2), 0.43 mM of the imidazolil pyrrolidine (C3). These conditions had
211
previously been determined in previous works according to the IC50 values [39-41].
212
As controls, gametes were incubated with either Hank´s buffer alone or with
213
inactivated fluid (15 min at 70 °C). After incubati on, gametes were washed three
214
times with Hank’s buffer and prepared for subsequent lectin binding and flow
215
cytometry.
216
2.9.
217
The activity of α-Fuc was measured using p-nitrophenyl -α-L-fucopyranoside
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
201
AC C
Enzymatic assays
218
substrate according to Barrett and Heath [43]. One unit of enzymatic activity
219
catalyzes the release of 1 nmol of p-nitrophenol. Different buffer solutions were used
220
depending on the experiment: 0.2 M citrate buffer was used to determine the activity
221
at low pH values (4.5, 5 and 5.5) and 0.2 M phosphate buffer was employed to the
222
determine the activity at high pH values (6, 6.5 and 7). The protein concentration was
223
determined according to Lowry [44].
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.10. Statistical analyses
225
Data were analyzed for normality distribution before a t test or one-way
226
ANOVA was performed. A Dunnett´s multiple comparisons test or a Tukey-Kramer’s
227
multiple comparisons test was used after one-way ANOVA as indicated in each
228
experiment. The level of significance was set at p< 0.05.
RI PT
224
229
2.11. Experimental design
230
Experiment 1. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of fucose in caput and cauda epididymal spermatozoa. For fucose content, FITC labelled lectin UEA-I
232
followed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry was used. In addition, we
233
analysed the pattern of fucosylated proteins by incubating biotin labelled lectin UEA-1
234
with sperm proteins immobilized in Nitrocellulose membrane.
M AN U
235
SC
231
Experiment 2. Evaluation of α-FUC content in the epididymis. The expression of α-FUC was studied by western blot on proteins from the tissue and fluid of the
237
caput, corpus and cauda epididymis. Moreover, we tested the activity of this enzyme
238
by spectrophotometrically, using a specific colorimetric substrate (p-nitrophenyl -α-L-
239
fucopyranoside).
Experiment 3. Effect of the cauda epididymal fluid on fucose content of caput
EP
240
TE D
236
spermatozoa. To examine the ability of the cauda fluid to remove fucose from the
242
caput spermatozoa, we incubated a crude cauda fluid with the spermatozoa under
243
conditions of epididymal environment. Afterwards, we evaluated the fucose content
244
by flow cytometry. As control, a heat inactivated (70º C) cauda fluid was used.
245
Experiment 4. Effect of α-FUC inhibitors on the fucose content of caput
246
spermatozoa. To corroborate the involvement of the soluble cauda epididymal α-Fuc
247
in the fucose removal of the caput spermatozoa, we incubated the samples in the
AC C
241
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 248
presence of specific inhibitors for the enzyme. The fucose content was then
249
evaluated by flow cytometry.
250
252
3.
Results In this study, we analysed the presence and location of α-L-fucose in sperm
RI PT
251
plasma membrane in bulls during their epididymal transit. By using FITC labelled
254
lectin UEA-I, we observed a post-acrosomal fucose detection in the caput
255
spermatozoa, which becomes lower (or weaker) towards the cauda gametes (Figure
256
1A). These results were quantified by flow cytometry and we observed a significant
257
decrease of fucose content in the surface of epididymal spermatozoa from the caput
258
to cauda (Figure 1 B). The specificity of the lectin was confirmed by competitive
259
inhibition with the sugar L-fucose (Figure 1B). In addition, the pattern of fucosylated
260
proteins was evaluated by binding of biotinylated UEA-I to sperm proteins
261
immobilized on nitrocellulose membranes (see materials and methods). In agreement
262
with the previous results, a decrease in the fucosylation level was observed in most
263
of the proteins of cauda spermatozoa (in the range of 75-110 and 30-20 kDa) when
264
compared with the caput spematozoa, although an increase in other protein of lower
265
Mr (~50 kDa) was observed in cauda spermatozoa (Figure 2). The decreased
266
fucosylation in the cauda spermatozoa may be related to an increase of α-FUC
267
activity along the epidiymal duct. Therefore, we evaluated the presence and the
268
activity of α-FUC in the bull epididymis to find that the enzyme is mostly expressed in
269
the caput and cauda and also in the corpus though at a lesser extent (Figure 3 A).
270
Interestingly, the enzyme was mostly detectable in the fluid obtained from the cauda
271
epididymis (Figure 3 B). These results were in agreement with the measured
272
enzymatic activity in each epididymal region (Figure 3 C). For these reasons, we
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
253
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT decided to test whether this enzyme can be active on caput spermatozoa and the
274
responsible of fucose remotion under the conditions of epididymal environment. First,
275
we observed that epididymal α-FUC is active against synthetic substrates at the
276
epididymal pH (6.5) although only 50 % of the optimum (pH 4.5) (data not shown).
277
Then we developed an assay in which the crude cauda fluid was incubated with
278
caput spermatozoa at 33 °C.
RI PT
273
After incubation, the fucose content was evaluated by flow cytometry, and we
279
observed a significant decrease in the sugar amount (Figure 4), indicating that the
281
enzyme can remove fucose from the caput spermatozoa. This effect was not
282
observed when heat inactivated epididymal fluid (70 °C) was used (Figure 4). To
283
corroborate that α-FUC activity from the epididymal fluid was responsible for the
284
decrease in the fucose content, the cauda spermatozoa were incubated with the
285
caput fluid in the presence of specific inhibitors, such as C1, C2 and C3 (Figure 5 A).
286
As shown in the Figure 5 B, the three compounds were able to inhibit the sperm
287
defucosylation caused by the epididymal fluid, thus confirming that an α-FUC is
288
involved in this phenomenon. In addition, the specificity of the inhibitors was
289
confirmed by evaluating enzyme activity with a synthetic substrate (Figure 5 C).
290 291 292
4.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
280
Discussion
The mammalian epididymis provides the proper molecular environment for the
293
sperm maturation. During this process, the plasma membrane undergoes several
294
modifications that include changes in the carbohydrate composition. In this study, we
295
present evidences indicating that the fucose content on the sperm surface is modified
296
during the epididymal transit and that this phenomenon could be related to sperm
297
maturation in bulls.
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 298
Herein, we observed that most of the fucosylated proteins are located along the post-acrosomal region in the caput spermatozoa. Despite the total fucose content
300
on sperm membrane decreases from the caput to the cauda, some proteins increase
301
their fucosylation status. This phenomenon could be the result of the balance
302
between the activities of α-L-fucosidase (α-FUC) and fucosyl-transferase existing in
303
the epididymal fluid. The presence of glycosyl-transferases has been documented in
304
the mammalian epididymis [2,6,45]. Moreover, it is known that the mammalian
305
epididymis cells synthesize and secrete acid glycosidases into the lumen, which
306
could be responsible for the changes observed in the sperm surface [2,5,6,14-19].
307
However, there were few direct evidences that demonstrate a role of the enzymes in
308
this process. In previous studies, we have described the presence of some of these
309
enzymes in the epididymal lumen and also observed that some of them interact with
310
specific receptors on the sperm plasma membrane [7]. However, α-L-fucosidase
311
mostly found in the soluble form, but not associated to spermatozoa neither within
312
membrane bounded vesicles from epididymal fluid, likely epididymosomes
313
(unpublished data).
314
Curiously, the pH of the epididymal environment would not be favourable for the
315
enzymatic activity, since the glycosidases are lysosomal enzymes. In this work, we
316
have focussed our study on the role of α-FUC in the remodelling of the sperm surface
317
and have provided direct evidences indicating that the α-FUC present in the cauda
318
epididymal fluid is active at conditions similar to those of the epididymal environment,
319
being able to remove fucose from the surface of bull spermatozoa. In previous
320
studies, the α-FUC activity was associated with the reproductive capacity, since this
321
enzyme increases in the epididymis of reproductively mature animals with respect to
322
immature ones, and it is mostly redistributed to the epididymal fluid in the the cauda
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
299
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT region (Aguilera et al., unpublished data). These evidences allow suggesting a role of
324
this enzyme in the fertility development in bulls. Furthermore, these results were in
325
accordance with those of Moura et.al [24], who have demonstrated the existence of a
326
high content of α-FUC in the cauda fluid of bulls with high fertility capacity. By means
327
of a polyclonal antibody against α-FUC, we detected a single band of 56 kDa,
328
suggesting the existence of one isoform in the epididymal fluid as in other species
329
[29,30]. However, the presence of other isoforms cannot be ruled out, since α-FUC
330
associated to sperm membrane has been described in bulls and in other mammalian
331
species [7,28-30,46,47]. The fact that the expression and activity of α-FUC are
332
detected in the cauda epididymis may indicate that most of the defucosylation
333
process occurs in this region of the organ. The epididymal α-FUC also exhibits some
334
properties that are similar to those from other tissues, such as an optimal acidic pH
335
and sensitivity to synthetic specific inhibitors [29,39,40]. However, the epididymal α-
336
FUC is also active, although at a lesser extent, at a pH that is similar to the
337
epididymal environment. Taking into account this phenomenon, we performed an in
338
vitro assay in which we incubated spermatozoa from the caput with the crude fluid
339
from the cauda. Under these experimental conditions, we clearly demonstrated that
340
α-FUC from the fluid is able to remove fucose from the sperm surface. The
341
involvement of the enzyme in this process has been corroborated by the use of
342
specific inhibitors which are active against the epididymal enzyme. It has been
343
suggested that fucose may play an important role in fertilization, since the addition of
344
this monosaccharide or fucoidan to the fertilization medium causes a reduction in the
345
penetration rates to porcine and bovine oocytes [37,48]. Other studies suggest that
346
fucose is involved in the formation of the sperm reservoir in the oviduct [31-33]. It is
347
also likely that sperm surface undergo additional changes in carbohydrate
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
323
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 348
composition once they leave the epididymis. This could be the result of the enzymatic
349
activity of glycosidases that have been described in reproductive fluids, such as
350
oviductal fluid [49]. These data provide, for the first time in bulls, direct evidence that the soluble
351
α-FUC in the epididymal fluid participates in the remodelling of the sperm surface, as
353
a step in the maturation of gametes, and that the fucosylation status of sperm
354
proteins contributes, in part, to that maturation process. Thus, the activity of α-FUC
355
and the state of fucosylation of sperm proteins can be considered as a parameter of
356
maturation. The latter finding might be useful in future studies assessing dysfunctions
357
related to male infertility.
359
5.
Funding
M AN U
358
SC
RI PT
352
This work was supported by Secretaria de Ciencia, técnica y Posgrado
360
(SECTyP,) Universidad Nacional de Cuyo-Mendoza (Argentina) [grant number:
362
06/J459]
TE D
361
363 6.
Acknowledgements
EP
364
Ms. Andrea Lafalla Manzano and Dr. Clara García Samartino (Flow Cytometry
365
Facility, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo) provided
367
assistance and consultation during flow cytometry experiments.
AC C
366
368 369
7.
References
370
[1] Hinton BT, Palladino MA, Rudolph D, Labus JC. The epididymis as protector of
371
maturing spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995;7:731-45.
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [2] Tulsiani DR, Orgebin-Crist MC, Skudlarek MD. Role of luminal fluid
373
glycosyltransferases and glycosidases in the modification of rat sperm plasma
374
membrane glycoproteins during epididymal maturation. J Reprod Fertil Suppl
375
1998;53:85-97.
376
[3] Sullivan R. Interaction between sperm and epididymal secretory proteins. In: C
377
Cagnon, editor. The male gamete: from basic to clinical applications, Vienna: Cache
378
River Press; 1999, p. 130-36.
379
[4] Cuasnicu P, Cohen D, Elleman D, Busso D, DaRos V, Morgenfeld M. Changes in
380
sperm proteins during epididymal maturation. In: Robaire B, Hinton B, editors. The
381
epididymis: from molecules to clinical practice, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum
382
Publishers; 2002, p. 81-102
383
[5] Tulsiani DR. Glycan modifying enzymes in luminal fluid of rat epididymis: are they
384
involved in altering sperm surface glycoproteins during maturation? Microsc Res
385
Tech 2003;61:18-27.
386
[6] Tulsiani DR. Glycan-modifying enzymes in luminal fluid of the mammalian
387
epididymis: an overview of their potential role in sperm maturation. Mol Cell
388
Endocrinol 2006;250:58-65.
389
[7] Aguilera AC, Boschin V, Carvelli L, Cavicchia JC, Sosa MA. Glycosidases interact
390
selectively with mannose-6-phosphate receptors of bull spermatozoa. J Cell Biochem
391
2016;117:2464-72
392
[8] Cooper TG. Interactions between epididymal secretions and spermatozoa. J
393
Reprod Fertil Suppl 1998;53:119-36.
394
[9] Robaire B, Hinton BT, Orgebin-Crist MC. The Epididymis. In: Knobil JN, Neil J,
395
editors. The physiology of reproduction, New York: Elsevier. 2006, p. 1071-148.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
372
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [10] Dacheux JL, Belleannee C, Jones R, Labas V, Belghazi M, Guyonnet B, et al.
397
Mammalian epididymal proteome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2009;306:45-50.
398
[11] Dacheux JL, Belleannee C, Guyonnet B, Labas V, Teixeira-Gomes AP, Ecroyd
399
H, et al. The contribution of proteomics to understanding epididymal maturation of
400
mammalian spermatozoa. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2012;58:197-210.
401
[12] Turner TT. De Graaf's thread: the human epididymis. J Androl 2008;29:237-250.
402
[13] Cornwall GA. New insights into epididymal biology and function. Hum Reprod
403
Update 2009;15:213-27.
404
[14] Mayorga LS, Bertini F. The origin of some acid hydrolases of the fluid of the rat
405
cauda epididymidis. J Androl 1985;6:243-45.
406
[15] Gupta G, Setty BS. Activities and androgenic regulation of lysosomal enzymes in
407
the epididymis of rhesus monkey. Endocr Res 1995;21:733-41.
408
[16] Belmonte SA, Romano PS, Sosa MA. Mannose-6-phosphate receptors as a
409
molecular indicator of maturation of epididymal sperm. Arch Androl 2002;48:53-63.
410
[17] Hermo LN, Robaire B. Epididymal cell types and their functions. In: Robaire B,
411
Hinton B, editors. The epididymis: from molecules to clinical practice, New York:
412
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002, p. 81-102.
413
[18] Dacheux JL, Castella S, Gatti JL, Dacheux F. Epididymal cell secretory activities
414
and the role of proteins in boar sperm maturation. Theriogenology 2005;63:319-41.
415
[19] Aguilera AC, Carvelli L, Boschin V, Mohamed F, Zyla L, Sosa MA. Changes in
416
lysosomal enzymes and mannose-6-phosphate receptors related to sexual
417
maturation in bull epididymis. Reprod Fertil Dev 2015; doi:10.1071/RD14380. [Epub
418
ahead of print]
419
[20] Levine N, Kelly H. Measurement of pH in the rat epididymis in vivo. J Reprod
420
Fertil 1978;52:333-35.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
396
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [21] Tulsiani DR, Skudlarek MD, Araki Y, Orgebin-Crist MC. Purification and
422
characterization of two forms of beta-D-galactosidase from rat epididymal luminal
423
fluid: evidence for their role in the modification of sperm plasma membrane
424
glycoprotein(s). Biochem J 1995;305:41-50.
425
[22] Belmonte SA, Challa A, Gutierrez LS, Bertini F, Sosa MA. Alpha-mannosidase
426
from rat epididymal fluid is a ligand for phosphomannosyl receptors on the sperm
427
surface. Int J Androl 1998;21:277-82.
428
[23] Belleannee C, Labas V, Teixeira-Gomes AP, Gatti JL, Dacheux JL, Dacheux F.
429
Identification of luminal and secreted proteins in bull epididymis. J Proteom
430
2011;74:59-78.
431
[24] Moura AA, Chapman DA, Koc H, Killian GJ. Proteins of the cauda epididymal
432
fluid associated with fertility of mature dairy bulls. J Androl 2006;27:534-41.
433
[25] Veeramachaneni DN, Smith MO, Ellinwood NM. Deficiency of fucosidase results
434
in acrosomal dysgenesis and impaired sperm maturation. J Androl 1998;19:444-9.
435
[26] Johnson SW, Alhadeff JA. Mammalian alpha-L-fucosidases. Comp Biochem
436
Physiol B 1991;99:479-88.
437
[27] Jauhiainen A, Vanha-Perttula T. alpha-L-Fucosidase in the reproductive organs
438
and seminal plasma of the bull. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986;880:91-95.
439
[28] Venditti JJ, Swann JM, Bean BS. Hamster sperm-associated alpha-L-fucosidase
440
functions during fertilization. Biol Reprod 2010;82:572-9.
441
[29] Phopin K, Nimlamool W, Bartlett MJ, Bean BS. Distribution, crypticity, stability,
442
and localization of α-L-fucosidase of mouse cauda epididymal sperm. Mol Reprod
443
Dev 2012;79:208-17.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
421
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [30] Khunsook S, Bean BS, McGowan SR, Alhadeff JA. Purification and
445
characterization of plasma membrane-associated human sperm alpha-L-fucosidase.
446
Biol Reprod 2002;68:709-16.
447
[31] Lefevre R, Lo MC, Suarez SS. Bovine sperm binding to oviductal epithelium
448
involves fucose recognition. Biol Reprod 1997;56:1198–204.
449
[32] Ignotz GG, Lo MC, Perez CL, Gwathmey TM, Suarez SS. Characterization of a
450
fucose-binding protein from bull sperm and seminal plasma that may be responsible
451
for formation of the oviductal sperm reservoir. Biol Reprod 2001;64:1806–11.
452
[33] Sostaric E, van de Lest CH, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM. Dynamics of
453
carbohydrate affinities at the cell surface of capacitating bovine sperm cells. Biol
454
Reprod 2005;72:346-57. Erratum in: Biol Reprod 2005;72:1062.
455
[34] Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Ramirez JP, Moos J. Solubilized human zona pellucida
456
competes with a fucosylated neoglycoprotein for binding sites on the human sperm
457
surface. Fertil Steril 1993;60:344-50.
458
[35] Lucas H, Bercegeay S, Le Pendu J, Jean M, Mirallie S, Barriere P. A fucose-
459
containing epitope potentially involved in gamete interaction on the human zona
460
pellucida. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1532-38.
461
[36] Taitzoglou IA, Kokoli AN, Killian GJ. Modifications of surface carbohydrates on
462
bovine spermatozoa mediated by oviductal fluid: a flow cytometric study using
463
lectins. Int J Androl 2007;30:108-14.
464
[37] Tanghe S, Van Soom A, Duchateau L, Nauwynck H, de Kruif A. Carbohydrates
465
and glycoproteins involved in bovine fertilization in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev
466
2004;68:492-99.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
444
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [38] Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) for routine
468
immunoblotting: An inexpensive alternative to commercially available kits.
469
Spermatogenesis. 2011;1:121-22.
470
[39] Elías-Rodríguez P, Moreno-Clavijo E, Carmona AT, Moreno-Vargas AJ, Robina
471
I. Rapid discovery of potent α-fucosidase inhibitors by in situ screening of a library of
472
(pyrrolidin-2-yl) triazoles. Org Biomol Chem 2014;12:5898-904.
473
[40] Moreno-Clavijo E, Carmona AT, Vera-Ayoso Y, Moreno-Vargas AJ, Bello C,
474
Vogel P, et al. Synthesis of novel pyrrolidine 3,4-diol derivatives as inhibitors of
475
alpha-L-fucosidases. Org Biomol Chem 2009;7:1192-2202.
476
[41] Moreno-Vargas AJ, Carmona AT, Mora F, Vogel P, Robina I. Stereoselective
477
synthesis of (2S,3S,4R,5S)-5-methylpyrrolidine-3,4-diol derivatives that are highly
478
selective alpha-L-fucosidase inhibitors. Chem Commun. 2005; 4949-51.
479
[42] Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJ.
480
Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm
481
membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil
482
1984;70:219-28.
483
[43] Barrett AJ, Heath MF. Lysosomes: A Laboratory Handbook. In: Dingle J, editor.
484
Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland and Biomedical Press; 1977, p. 118-20.
485
[44] Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the
486
Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265-75.
487
[45] Tulsiani DR, Skudlarek MD, Holland MK, Orgebin-Crist MC. Glycosylation of rat
488
sperm plasma membrane during epididymal maturation. Biol Reprod 1993;48:417-
489
28.
490
[46] Hancock LW, Raab LS, Aronson NN Jr. Synthesis and processing of rat sperm-
491
associated alpha-L-fucosidase. Biol Reprod 1993;48:1228-38.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
467
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [47] Venditti JJ, Bean BS. Stabilization of membrane-associated alpha-L-fucosidase
493
by the human sperm equatorial segment. Int J Androl 2009;32:556-62.
494
[48] Song XX, Park CK, Piao, YJ, Niwa K. Effect of monosaccharide L-fucose and
495
polysaccharide fucoidan on sperm α-L-fucosidase activity and relation to sperm-
496
oocyte interaction in pig. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
497
2007;20:351–58.
498
[49] Carrasco LC, Coy P, Avilés M, Gadea J, Romar R. Glycosidase determination in
499
bovine oviducal fluid at the follicular and luteal phases of the oestrous cycle. Reprod
500
Fertil Dev 2008;20:808-17.
M AN U
501
SC
RI PT
492
8.
503
Figure 1. α-L-fucose in bull epididymal spermatozoa. A) Distribution of the sugar in
504
spermatozoa from caput and cauda using FITC-conjugated UEA-I and assessed by
505
fluorescence microscopy. B) Analysis of the fluorescence by flow cytometry, and C)
506
the corresponding quantification. Aut: autofluorescence of cauda spermatozoa alone;
507
Cau Sp: cauda spermatozoa; Cau Sp + F: cauda spermatozoa plus 0.5 M fucose;
508
Cap Sp: caput spermatozoa. Bars represent the means of relative fluorescence
509
intensity (R.F.I.) ± SD (n = 12). Data were analysed by t test, (***) significantly
510
different from cauda (P<0.05).
EP
AC C
511
Figure legends
TE D
502
512
Figure 2. Patterns of membrane fucosylated proteins from caput (Cap Sp) and cauda
513
(Cau Sp) spermatozoa, detected with biotin-conjugated UEA-I on nitrocellulose
514
membranes. As control, the membrane was stained with Ponceau S.
515
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 3. Detection of α-L-fucosidase (α-FUC) in bull epididiymis. Immunoblot for
517
detection of α-FUC in epididymal tissue (A) and fluid (B), and the corresponding
518
quantifications from the epididymal regions as indicated. Bars represent the means of
519
relative optical densities (R.O.D.) ± SD (n = 3). Ponceau S stain was used as loading
520
and transference controls. (*) Significantly different from corpus and caput (P<0.05),
521
and (**) significantly different from corpus (P<0.05 C). α-FUC activity measured in
522
epididymal tissue and fluid from the three epididymal regions (C). Bars represent the
523
means ± SEM of specific activity (n=5). (*) Significantly different from corpus and
524
caput (P<0.05) and (**) significantly different from corpus (P<0.05). In all the cases,
525
data were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tuckey-Kramer´s multiple
526
comparison test.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
516
527
Figure 4. Determination of α-L-fucose in caput spermatozoa after the incubation with
529
cauda fluid. Flow cytometry analysis of the fucose content using the FITC labelled
530
lectin UEA-I after the incubation of caput spermatozoa (Sp) with cauda fluid. As
531
control, cauda inactivated fluid (I Fluid) (heated for 15 min at 70 ºC) and buffer
532
(Hank`s) were used. Bars represent the means of the R.F.I ± SEM (n = 12) of each
533
treatment. Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett´s multiple
534
comparison test. (**) Significantly different from Buffer and I Fluid (P<0.05).
EP
AC C
535
TE D
528
Determination of α-L-fucose in caput spermatozoa (Sp) after the
536
Figure 5.
537
incubation with cauda fluid, in the absence or presence of the α-FUC inhibitors. A)
538
Molecular structure of the synthetic inhibitors (C1, C2 and C3) of α-L-fucosidase (α-
539
FUC). Ki represents the inhibition constant for each compound. B) Flow cytometry
540
analysis, the profiles are representative of all the conditions employed and C)
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT quantification of R.F.I. Data were normalized to fluid alone (R.F.I.=1). Bars represent
542
the means of RFI ± SD (n = 12). Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by
543
a Dunnett´s multiple comparison test. (*) Significantly different from all the conditions
544
used (P<0.05). D) The effect of the inhibitors (at 0.3 µM, 17 nM and 80 nM for C1, C2
545
and C3, respectively) on the α-FUC activity of cauda epididymal fluid (n = 5). Bars
546
represent the means ± SEM of specific activity.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
547
RI PT
541
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
C
1500
***
1000
R.F.I.
M AN U
Aut Cau Sp + F Cau Sp Cap Sp
SC
B
RI PT
Caput
Cauda
A
500
Cap Sp
Cau Sp
AC C
EP
TE D
0
Aguilera et al., Figure 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
UEA-I biotin Cap Sp
Cau Sp
Cap Sp
Cau Sp
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Mr (kDa)
Ponceau S
Aguilera et al., Figure 2
Epididymal Tissue
A
Caput
Corpus
Cauda 4
56 kDa
**
3
R.O.D.
α-FUC
2 1 0
Caput
Corpus
Cauda
20
56 kDa
Corpus
Cauda
*
15
R.O.D.
α-FUC
Caput
SC
B
Epididymal Fluid
RI PT
Ponceau S
10
M AN U
5
Ponceau S
0
C
Caput
Corpus
Cauda
α-FUC activity
)
2000 1000 0
Cauda
Caput
Corpus
Cauda
4000
*
2000
U/g protein (10 2)
**
3000
EP
U/g protein (10 2)
*
Fluid
2500
U/g protein (10 2)
TE D
Tissue 4000
1500 1000 500 0
Caput
Corpus
Cauda
AC C
us
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Aguilera et al., Figure 3
3000 2000 1000 0
Capu
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Sp + Buffer
2.0
M AN U TE D EP AC C
Aguilera et al., Figure 4
id
d
IF lu
ui
+
Fl
SC
Sp
+
B
uf
fe
r
0.0
+
0.5
RI PT
**
1.0
Sp
R.F.I.
1.5
Sp
Sp + Fluid Sp + I Fluid
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
A
C3
Ki =0.024 µM (C)
Ki =0.004 µM (C)
Ki =0.080 µM (C)
RI PT
C2
C )
Sp + Buffer Sp + Fluid
2.0
Sp + Fluid + C1
SC
R.F.I.
1.5
*
1.0
M AN U
0.5
1500
AC C
500
EP
1000
Aguilera et al., Figure 5
3 Fl
ui
d
+
C
2 Fl
ui
d
+
C
1 C
+
d
Fl
ui
Fl
ui
d
0
C 3 +
Sp
+
Fl ui d
+
C 2
C 1 Fl ui d +
Sp
+F lu id
+
Fl Sp
+
Sp
Sp
+
B
uf
ui
fe
d
r
0.0
2
) D
TE D
B
C1
U/g protein U/g protein (10 (102))
)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights •
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
• •
Fucose content of sperm membrane decreases toward the cauda of bull epididymis. An increased activity of α-L-fucosidase is found in the fluid of cauda epididymis. Defucosylation of glycoproteins would be related to epididymal sperm maturation.