Scripta M E T A L L U R G I C A
Vol. 9, pp. 1181-1184, 1975 Printed in the United States
EQUILIBRIUM
SURFACE
OF CARBON ON IRON H.J. Grabke, Max-Planck-Institut
Pergamon
Press,
Inc.
SEGREGATION
(100) FACES
G. Tauber and H. Viefhaus
fHr E i s e n f o r s c h u n g
GMBH,
DUsseldorf,
W.Germany
~Received July 24, 1975) (Revised Sentember 26, 1975) Introduction Chemisorbed
layers of nonmetal
properties
of the metal,
phenomena,
such as recrystallisation,
sticity etc. Therefore,
studies
makes e q u i l i b r i u m are i) that isorbed) there
investigations
quickly,
~ molecules
is sufficient
influence
equilibria
several and many
sintering,
at elevated
pla-
tempera-
studies b~ LEED and AES in an UHV
from the gas phase
is intended,
and possib-
In some other cases the study of surface se~re@ation
the segregation
is e s t a b l i s h e d
Equilibrium
if adsorption
le only in a few cases.
surfaces
surface reaction kinetics,
of c h e m i s o r p t i o n
tures would be of great interest. chamber are difficult,
atoms on metal
like surface energy and surface self diffusion,
using LEED and AES possible.
equilibrium:
atoms(dissolved)
ii) that the desorption
in the gas phase,
of the adsorbate
on can occur without depletion
of solute atoms.
Some studies of the surface (3), in which q u a n t i t a t i v e
species:
can occur only very slowly,
solubility
aces have already been published,
of adsorbed
The preconditions
# atoms(chemisorbed),
in the metal,
segregation
of nonmetal
atoms(chem-
iii) that
so that segregati-
atoms on metal
surf-
on the system Ni-C (1,2) and on the system Nb-O
thermodynamic
data have been obtained
sults reported here are part of studies on surface gen,
sulfur and oxygen on iron single crystals.
ons
are m e a s u r e d
by AES and c h e m i s o r p t i o n
segregation
by AES.
of carbon,
Surface e q u i l i b r i u m
structures
The renitro-
concentrati-
are observed by LEED
(4).
Experimental (100) oriented orienting, different
Fe specimens were prepared
cutting and m e c h a n i c a l carbon c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
equilibration
according
ed carbon concentrations Each doped
to
polishing.
by c a r b u r i z i n g
CH4(g)
plug contact.
It also could be w i t h d r a w n
During this procedure
the pressure
+ 2 H2(g)
By
at 800°C well defin-
in the range O .... 120 w t . p p m C.
sample was m o u n t e d on a small heating
ted in the UHV chamber through an air-lock
by
specimens were doped with
in flowing CH4-H 2 mixtures.
= C(dissolved)
(5-7) were obtained
from iron single crystals
Several
stage.
This assembly was inser-
and joined to the m a n i p u l a t o r
by a
without opening the UHV chamber
(8).
could always be kept below
1181
10 -9 Torr.
1182
SEGREGATION OF CARBON ON IRON
Vol. 9, No. 11
Surface impurities were removed by argon bombardment and heating cycles. The impurity signals could be reduced below detection limit and the experiments were started with a clean surface showing only the Auger electron peaks for iron. It
was very important to have samples which were as low in sulfur content
as possible, otherwise, the sulfur segregation would have suppressed the carbon segregation. The sample was heated to the temperature range in which the solid solution of carbon in a-iron is stable. In this well-known range of temperature and carbon concentration
(9) no precipitation of graphite or cementite is possible.
In some experiments graphite deposits formed on the surface during heating or cooling of the sample. But, as soon as the graphite solubility curve was passed, at higher temperatures the graphite dissolved in the crystal. This could be seen from the LEED pattern
(FIGS. 1 and 2) and also from the shape of the
FIG. 1 LEED pattern of an iron surface with graphite deposits, 72 eV, room temperature
FIG. 2 LEED pattern of an Fe (100) face with chemisorbed carbon, 43 eV, 580°C, 30 ppm C
Auger electron peaks for carbon (FIG. 3). The sequence of events shown in FIG. 3 recorded during heating a sample with 30 ppm C to 450°C shows the changes taking place on the surface during the decomposition of graphite. The lowest curve shows the typical graphite fine structure with a large peak at 270 eV, and the highest curve, obtained after 685 set at 450°C, shows the fine structure which was observed for carbides in several cases (4). Since Fe3C cannot be formed under these conditions the carbon Auger peaks of that curve are attributed to atomic carbon on the iron surface.
Vol.
9, No.
II
S E G R E G A T I O N OF CARBON ON IRON
1183
Results The a d s o r p t i o n of atomic carbon on the (s-Fe)-C crystal was t h o r o u g h l y i n v e s t i g a t e d 5O5
for the Fe(100)
face. The peak height of the
445
carbon peak at 270 eV was m e a s u r e d as a func-
385
tion of the temperature.
325
peak heights
The ratio r of the
for carbon and for iron is plot-
205
ff5
ted in FIG.
55
4, l o g a r i t h m i c a l l y vs. the reci-
procal t e m p e r a t u r e
I/T. At low t e m p e r a t u r e s
the lines a p p r o a c h the l i m i t i n g value r =0.6. s This value p r e s u m a b l y c o r r e s p o n d s to a saturation of the Fe(IOO) a chemisorption
~uJg~¢" MIctro¢l peak5 for CClrbOn on Fe (100), $omple with 30ppm C, di~o~ution of g r ~ N t e ot ~50" C , Olomic ~Lqorbed corbon iS
surface by f o r m a t i o n of
r,maimng on me surface
The degree of c o v e r a g e was c a l c u l a t e d
""
FIG. 3. Change of the A u g e r e l e c t r o n peaks for carbon, when graphite transforms to c h e m i s o r b e d carbon
a c c o r d i n g to @ I r/rs . If the c h e m i s o r p t i o n of carbon on Fe(IOO) isotherm
i,
structure.
follows the L a n g m u i r - M c L e a n
(2), a plot of in O/(I-8)
yield s t r a i g h t lines,
FIG.
vs I/T should
5, from w h i c h the e n t h a l p y and excess entropy of se-
g r e g a t i o n can be o b t a i n e d a c c o r d i n g to @ ~Hse~r in I - @ = RT
+
AS xs se~r R
xC + In -~-
In this e q u a t i o n x C is the m o l e fraction of d i s s o l v e d carbon and b is the number of i n t e r s t i t a l octahedral
sites per metal atom, w h i c h may be o c c u p i e d by carbon atoms
sites in bcc ~-Fe: b=3).
(for
The value of the s e g r e g a t i o n e n t h a l p y is
AHseg r = -20 ± I k c a l / m o l e C, the change of the excess e n t r o p y upon s e g r e g a t i o n
850
800
750
700
650
600
550 °C
3
06 0.5
•<
z/
0.3
/3o
l ~.. 02
c 01 00g
/
0.08 i
0~7
I
• 0,9
i
I
0~5
1,0
,
1.05
IJO
i
1.15
1.20
I03/T FIG. 4. L o g a r i t h m i c plot of the ratio carbon peak (270 e V ) / i r o n peak (650 eV)
vs
Io3/T
[K-I]
-2
0.9
lO
I]
1.2 13 103/T
FIG. 5. Plot of in @/ (1-@) v s . 1 0 3 / T
1184
SEGREGATION
OF CARBON ON IRON
Vol.
9, No.
ii
is AS xs = O ± 1 cal/K mole C. A c c e p t i n q the value of the relative partial ensegr thalpy of carbon in e-iron p r o p o s e d by Dunn and McLellan (10), 23.34 kcal/mole C at 1000 K, a c h e m i s o r p t i o n C(graphite)
enthalpy
= C(chemisorbed)
is o b t a i n e d
for the reaction
~H = -3 ± I kcal/mole C. Discussion
The small change of the excess entropy upon segregation the carbon c h e m i s o r p t i o n onal entropy octahedral
on Fe(IOO)
is insignificant.
interstital
the surface.
In that site there is plenty of space for the car-
diminished,
iron atoms is lowered by one,
Thus,
the p o s s i b i l i t y
of chemical
the c o o r d i n a t i o n
interaction
but on the other hand a c o n s i d e r a b l e
force for the surface
According
to a c a l i b r a t i o n
des the saturation
value r
p(2x2)
adsorption
te a c(2x2)
interaction
This surface c o n c e n t r a t i o n
in domains
energy
segregation.
(4) with some Fe-C alloys and
structure whereas
structure
of chemical
is li-
site. The dif-
(Fe,Cr)-carbi-
of the Auger peak height ratio corresponds
s tio C/Fe = 0.2 on the surface.
Z
of iron and carbon is
amount of elastic energy
release of elastic energy minus decrease
is the driving
number
from Z = 6 in the bulk to Z = 5 in
berated w h e n the carbon atom pops up from the bulk to the surface ference,
that
in vibrati-
Most p r o b a b l y the carbon atoms are chemisorbed in .I,I. - on Fe(IOO) in the site [~ ~; in
If that site is occupied, upon segregation
of n e i g h b o u r i n g
indicates
and that the change
sites at the surface,
the center of the unit mesh. bon atom.
is localized
to a ra-
is in agreement with a
the LEED studies on the same samples
(FIG. 2). Further
investigation
indica-
is being per-
formed to find out if the LEED p a t t e r n can be explained by the formation of special domain
structures. Acknowledgement
This research was supported schungsvereinigungen
through the A r b e i t s g e m e i n s c h a f t
(AIF) by the B u n d e s m i n i s t e r i u m
Industrieller
fur Wirtschaft,
For-
Federal
Republic Germany. References I.
J.C.
Shelton,
2.
L.C.
Isett,
3.
A. Joshi,
4.
H.J. Grabke,
5.
R.P.
Smith,
E. SchHrmann, H.J.
8.
G. Tauber,
9.
J.C.
Grabke,
Th. Schmidt, E. Martin, Trans.
Blakely,
Surface Sci.
Scripta Met.
Chem.
H. Viefhaus,
Swartz,
J.M.
W. Paulitschke, J. A~er.
7.
Dunn,
Patil,
M. Strongin,
6.
10. W.W.
H.R.
J.M. Blakely,
Surface 47, 645
8, 413
G. Tauber,
Soc.
AIME 245,
(1974).
(1974).
H. Viefhaus,
to be published.
GieBerei-Forsch.
EisenhHttenwes.
44, 837
to be published.
R.B. McLellan,
43, 493
68, 1163(1946).
F. Tillmann,
Arch.
Sci.
(1975).
1083
(1969).
Met. Trans.
2, 1079
(1971).
19, 35
(1972).
(1967).