- Email: [email protected]
Erratum to “Impact of terrain slope and aspect on radargrammetric DEM accuracy” [ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 57 (2002) 228–240]
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 58 (2003) 124 – 125 www.elsevier.com/locate/isprsjprs
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Impact of terrain slope and aspect on radargrammetric DEM accuracy’’ $ [ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 57 (2002) 228–240] Thierry Toutin * Natural Resources Canada, Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, 588 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0Y7
Fig. 6 on page 237 should have been published in colour, but due to a printing error it appeared in black and white. The publisher apologises to the author and readers for this error. The correct colour figure is shown on the following page and can also be viewed in the on-line version of the paper on ScienceDirect.
$
doi of original article 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00123-5. * Tel.: +1-613-947-1293; fax: +1-613-947-1385. E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Toutin). 0924-2716/03/$ - see front matter. Crown Copyright D 2003 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(03)00036-4
T. Toutin / ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 58 (2003) 124–125
125
Fig. 6. Results of the elevation errors with a confidence level of 73% (in meters) for the F1 – F5 radargrammetric DEMs as a function of terrain aspect (foreslope, azimuth, backslope and reverse azimuth) for each terrain-slope class over the three study sites: (A) Sherbrooke, Que´bec; (B) Okanagan, British Columbia; (C) Moose Mountain, Alberta. The azimuth is the direction of the satellite and the reverse azimuth is the reverse direction of the satellite.
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Impact of terrain slope and aspect on radargrammetric DEM accuracy’’ $ [ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 57 (2002) 228–240] Thierry Toutin * Natural Resources Canada, Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, 588 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0Y7
Fig. 6 on page 237 should have been published in colour, but due to a printing error it appeared in black and white. The publisher apologises to the author and readers for this error. The correct colour figure is shown on the following page and can also be viewed in the on-line version of the paper on ScienceDirect.
$
doi of original article 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00123-5. * Tel.: +1-613-947-1293; fax: +1-613-947-1385. E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Toutin). 0924-2716/03/$ - see front matter. Crown Copyright D 2003 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(03)00036-4
T. Toutin / ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 58 (2003) 124–125
125
Fig. 6. Results of the elevation errors with a confidence level of 73% (in meters) for the F1 – F5 radargrammetric DEMs as a function of terrain aspect (foreslope, azimuth, backslope and reverse azimuth) for each terrain-slope class over the three study sites: (A) Sherbrooke, Que´bec; (B) Okanagan, British Columbia; (C) Moose Mountain, Alberta. The azimuth is the direction of the satellite and the reverse azimuth is the reverse direction of the satellite.