Erratum to “Laminar characteristics of functional connectivity in rat barrel cortex revealed by stimulation with caged-glutamate”

Erratum to “Laminar characteristics of functional connectivity in rat barrel cortex revealed by stimulation with caged-glutamate”

Neuroscience Research 38 (2000) 221 www.elsevier.com/locate/neures Erratum Erratum to ‘‘Laminar characteristics of functional connectivity in rat ba...

48KB Sizes 0 Downloads 42 Views

Neuroscience Research 38 (2000) 221 www.elsevier.com/locate/neures

Erratum

Erratum to ‘‘Laminar characteristics of functional connectivity in rat barrel cortex revealed by stimulation with caged-glutamate’’ [Neuroscience Research 37 (2000) 49–58] Jochen F. Staiger a,*, Rolf Ko¨tter a,b, Karl Zilles a,c, Heiko J. Luhmann d b

a C. & O. Vogt-Institut fu¨r Hirnforschung, Heinrich-Heine-Uni6ersita¨t, Uni6ersita¨tsstr. 1, D-40225 Du¨sseldorf, Germany Institut fu¨r Morphologische Endokrinologie und Histochemie, Heinrich-Heine-Uni6ersita¨t, Uni6ersita¨tsstr. 1, D-40225 Du¨sseldorf, Germany c Institut fu¨r Medizin, Forschungszentrum Ju¨lich, D-52425 Ju¨lich, Germany d Institut fu¨r Neurophysiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Uni6ersita¨t, Uni6ersita¨tsstr. 1, D-40225 Du¨sseldorf, Germany

Received 9 August 2000

The publisher regrets that Table 1 of the above article was printed with errors. The corrected Table 1 is printed below.

Table 1 Comparison of the anatomical connectivity pattern (left panel) with the excitatory laminar interactions shown in the present study (right panel)a Anatomical connectivity

Functional interactions

From To

From

II III IV V VI

II

III

IV

V

VI

++(+)(2, 3) +(+)(2, 3, 5) +(2, 3, 4) +(2) (+)(3, 6)

+(2, 3) +++(2, 5) +++(1, 2, 3, 4) +(2, 5) +(3, 6)

−(2, 3) (+)(2, 5) ++(1, 2, 3, 4) +(2, 5) +++(3, 4, 6)

++(2, 3) +++(2, 3, 5) +(1, 2, 3, 4) ++(+)(2, 5) ++(+)(3, 6)

(+)(2, 3) (+)(2, 3, 5) +(1, 2, 3, 4) +++(3, 4, 5) ++(+)(5, 6)

II III IV V VI

To II

III

IV

V

VI

++ + ++++ − −

+ ++ ++++ (+) −

− + ++ + −

+ ++ +++ ++ +

− − (+) +(+) ++

a The symbol ‘−’ indicates the absence of a connection/interaction, ‘(+)’ indicates an inconsistent connection/interaction, ‘+’–‘++++’ indicates increasing density/strength of connection/interaction. The connectivity data represent the best approximation to selectivity by including only studies where single cells were filled intracellularly 1Anderson et al., 1994; 2Callaway and Wiser, 1996; 3Gilbert and Wiesel, 1979; 4Gilbert and Wiesel, 1983; 5Gottlieb and Keller, 1997; 6Zhang and Deschenes, 1998). However, constraints are that: (i) data are derived from visual and somatosensory cortex of rat, cat and monkey; (ii) some studies are conducted in vivo, some in vitro; (iii) in most studies the bouton distribution was not shown; and (iv) for layer V and VI the table is biased; e.g. for layer V, it focuses on pyramidal cells of Gilbert and Wiesel (1979), which seem to be similar to the intrinsic bursting-type pyramids in rat. However, if one would represent the more frequent regular spiking-type, this would possess more axon collaterals in supra- and fewer in infragranular layers (Chagnac-Amitai et al., 1990). For layer VI, thalamically projecting cells are preferentially shown (non-thalamically projecting cells seem to have a differently organized axonal arbor; Zhang and Deschenes, 1998). .



PII of original article: S 0 1 6 8 - 0 1 0 2 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 9 4 - 8. * Corresponding author. Tel.: + 49-211-8112727; fax: + 49-211-8112336. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.F. Staiger).

0168-0102/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 1 6 8 - 0 1 0 2 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 1 8 1 - 4