Erratum to: “Models which might explain negative correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects”

Erratum to: “Models which might explain negative correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects”

LIVESTOCK ELSEVIER pR!iisz!FN Livestock Production Science 47 (1997) 277 Erratum Erratum to: “Models which might explain negative correlations bet...

52KB Sizes 1 Downloads 35 Views

LIVESTOCK ELSEVIER

pR!iisz!FN Livestock Production

Science 47 (1997) 277

Erratum

Erratum to: “Models which might explain negative correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects” [Livest. Prod. Sci. 45 (1996) 111-1221 ’ D.L. Robinson Anidale,

The Publisher regrets that, due to a production problem, corrections to this article were not carried out. p. 112, Eq. (1): p should be in normal type, not subscript. p. 113, right column, line 19: for ~~2, read oz. p. 113, Table 2, third column heading: for Psdv,, read Psdyi. p. 114, left column, Section 2.1, line 13, should read: for permanent environmental effect of dam (c2). p. 114, Table 3, line 2 of description: for ‘below,’ read ‘above.‘. p. 115, Table 4, first column: for o2;, read ap2.

NSW, Australia

p. 116, Table 5, last column heading should read: (Average SEjb. p. 118, Table 8, Dataset B2, row ram (%I: the column AMC should be empty; the value -26.6 belongs to the column AMRC and the value (8.6) to the column (Average SE). p. 121, right column, line 1: (1) is the equation number; line 2, Eq. (2): p2 should be in line, not subscript; lines 17 and 18, equation Variance of residual terms: &en should read Pnen and 1 - p2 should read 1 - p2; line 27, last term of Variance of genetic terms, before ‘So’: ra2pcrc,2 should read q,2 + pa,2.

’ PII of original article: SO301-6226(96)00002-4

0301-6226/97/$17.00 0 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PI1 SO301-6226(96)01396-6