- Email: [email protected]
Erratum to “Reactivity of concurrent verbal reporting in second language writing” [J. Second Lang. Writ. 24 (2014) 51–70]
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect Journal of Second Language Writing 27 (2015) 140
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Reactivity of concurrent verbal reporting in second language writing’’ [J. Second Lang. Writ. 24 (2014) 51–70] Chengsong Yang a,b, Guangwei Hu c, Lawrence Jun Zhang b,* a
School of International Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China b Faculty of Education, University of Auckland, New Zealand c National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
The authors regret that three errors have occurred in their paper. They are as follows: p. 58, Footnote 6: Original: A ratio index was calculated by dividing the number of T-units in the participant’s essay by the total instances of reason roughly identified. Corrected: A ratio index was calculated by dividing the total instances of reason roughly identified in a participant’s essay by its total number of T-units coded. p. 59, Line 13: Original: An ultimate reliability rate of .932 was achieved. Corrected: An ultimate reliability rate of .932 was achieved after discussions and some rescoring. p. 63, The 11th line of the third paragraph: Original: were (in: Even when relevant metacognitive knowledge were retrieved). Corrected: was. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.03.002. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +64 9 6238899x48750; mobile: +64 221633268. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C. Yang), [email protected] (G. Hu), [email protected], [email protected] (L.J. Zhang). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.01.002 1060-3743/# 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect Journal of Second Language Writing 27 (2015) 140
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Reactivity of concurrent verbal reporting in second language writing’’ [J. Second Lang. Writ. 24 (2014) 51–70] Chengsong Yang a,b, Guangwei Hu c, Lawrence Jun Zhang b,* a
School of International Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China b Faculty of Education, University of Auckland, New Zealand c National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
The authors regret that three errors have occurred in their paper. They are as follows: p. 58, Footnote 6: Original: A ratio index was calculated by dividing the number of T-units in the participant’s essay by the total instances of reason roughly identified. Corrected: A ratio index was calculated by dividing the total instances of reason roughly identified in a participant’s essay by its total number of T-units coded. p. 59, Line 13: Original: An ultimate reliability rate of .932 was achieved. Corrected: An ultimate reliability rate of .932 was achieved after discussions and some rescoring. p. 63, The 11th line of the third paragraph: Original: were (in: Even when relevant metacognitive knowledge were retrieved). Corrected: was. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.03.002. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +64 9 6238899x48750; mobile: +64 221633268. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C. Yang), [email protected] (G. Hu), [email protected], [email protected] (L.J. Zhang). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.01.002 1060-3743/# 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.