Erratum to ‘Reconceptualising Risk in Childbirth’ [Midwifery 38 (2016) 1−5]

Midwifery ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Midwifery journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/midw

Erratum

Erratum to ‘Reconceptualising Risk in Childbirth’ [Midwifery 38 (2016) 1 5] Kirstie Coxon, RN, RM, BSc, MA, PhD (Senior Lecturer, Guest Editor)a, Caroline Homer, MScMed (ClinEpi), PhD (Professor, Associate Editor 'Midwifery')b, Andrew Bisits, MD (Medical Co-Director-of-Maternity, Guest Editor 'Midwifery')c, Jane Sandall, RN, RM, HV, BSc, MSc, PhD (Professor, Associate Editor 'Midwifery')d, Debra Bick, RM, BA, MMedSci, PhD (Professor, Editor in Chief ‘Midwifery’)a a

King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, UK University of Technology Sydney, Australia Royal Hospital for Women, Barker St. Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia d King's College London, Division of Women's Health, School of Medicine, UK b c

art ic l e i nf o Article history: Received 2 September 2016 Accepted 2 September 2016

The publisher regrets an error was published in this Editorial. The Editorial states the setting for the study in article 'Paramedics' involvement in planned home birth: A one-year case study' is Canada. This is incorrect as the setting for this study is Victoria, Australia. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.012 E-mail address: [email protected] (K. Coxon). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.001 0266-6138/

Please cite this article as: Coxon, K., et al., Erratum to ‘Reconceptualising Risk in Childbirth’ [Midwifery 38 (2016) 1 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.001i

5]. Midwifery