- Email: [email protected]
Erratum to “Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure” [Speech Comm. 42 (2004) 313–328]
Speech Communication 45 (2005) 1 www.elsevier.com/locate/specom
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure’’ [Speech Comm. 42 (2004) 313–328] Jan Zera Department of Acoustic and Electromagnetic Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland Music Acoustics Laboratory, Department of Sound Engineering, Chopin Academy of Music, Oko´lnik 2, 00-368 Warsaw, Poland
The Publisher regrets that a typographical error was made in the printed version of the above article. On page 326 the sentence: ‘‘In the present simulations, the bias equaled 0.45, 0.33, and 0.14 dB, for 15, 25 and 50 trials in an adaptive run, at the sweetpoint ?tul> of 65.1% correct responses.’’
should read: ‘‘In the present simulations, the bias equaled 0.45, 0.33, and 0.14 dB, for 15, 25 and 50 trials in an adaptive run, at the sweetpoint of 65.1% correct responses.’’ The Publisher apologises for the error.
DOI of original article 10.1016/specom.2003.08.007. E-mail address: [email protected] 0167-6393/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.10.005
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure’’ [Speech Comm. 42 (2004) 313–328] Jan Zera Department of Acoustic and Electromagnetic Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, Czerniakowska 16, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland Music Acoustics Laboratory, Department of Sound Engineering, Chopin Academy of Music, Oko´lnik 2, 00-368 Warsaw, Poland
The Publisher regrets that a typographical error was made in the printed version of the above article. On page 326 the sentence: ‘‘In the present simulations, the bias equaled 0.45, 0.33, and 0.14 dB, for 15, 25 and 50 trials in an adaptive run, at the sweetpoint ?tul> of 65.1% correct responses.’’
should read: ‘‘In the present simulations, the bias equaled 0.45, 0.33, and 0.14 dB, for 15, 25 and 50 trials in an adaptive run, at the sweetpoint of 65.1% correct responses.’’ The Publisher apologises for the error.
DOI of original article 10.1016/specom.2003.08.007. E-mail address: [email protected] 0167-6393/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.10.005