- Email: [email protected]
Estate planning & planned giving
Sakima, Sakima, and Melsen 353
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 126, Number 3
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
oramic and lateral oblique radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:225-31. Jonkman REG, van Waas MAJ, Plooij J, Kalk W. Measuring mandibular ridge reduction on oblique cephalometric radiographs. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;19:27-30. Verhoeven JW, Cune MS. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and accuracy of the technique in height measurements of mandibular bone in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:39-43. Verhoeven JW, Ruijter J, Cune MS, Terlou M. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and reproducibility of the technique in quantitative densitometric measurements of mandible in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:476-86. Melnik AK. A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:355-66. Janson GRP, Metaxas A, Woodside DG, Freitas MR, Pinzan A. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:406-18. Kyrkanides S, Richter L. Mandibular asymmetry and antigonial notching in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:30-5. Sakima MT. Comparative cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction. An implant study [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 1997. Castro AGB. Cephalometric study of the posterior anchorage unit in the canine retraction utilizing T loop, reverse vertical loop
39.
40.
41.
42.
43. 44.
45.
46.
47.
with helicoids and sliding mechanics [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 1997. Fuziy A. Cephalometric study of three types of canine retraction [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 1997. Terada HH. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment for deep overbite correction using the Ricketts method—an implant study [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 2001. Sakima PRT. Projection errors effects on the cephalometric measurements of the Steiner and McNamara analysis [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 2001. Grayson BH, McCarthy TG, Bookstein F. Analysis of craniofacial asymmetry by multiplane cephalometry. Am J Orthod 1983;84:217-24. Cook JT. Asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton. Br J Orthod 1980;7:33-8. Baumrind S, Miller D, Molthen R. The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. Am J Orthod 1976; 70:617-44. Iseri H, Solow B. Average surface remodeling of the maxillary base and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years. An implant study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107: 48-57. Nielsen IL. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluations of growth and treatment change. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:422-31. Springate SD, Jones AG. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:263-69.
ESTATE PLANNING & PLANNED GIVING Estate Planning: The AAO Foundation offers information on estate planning to AAO members and their advisors on a complimentary basis and at no obligation. Planned giving: Persons who are contemplating a gift to the AAO Foundation through their estates are asked to contact the AAOF before proceeding. Please call (800) 424-2481, extension 246. Please remember the AAO Foundation in your estate planning.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 126, Number 3
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
oramic and lateral oblique radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:225-31. Jonkman REG, van Waas MAJ, Plooij J, Kalk W. Measuring mandibular ridge reduction on oblique cephalometric radiographs. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;19:27-30. Verhoeven JW, Cune MS. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and accuracy of the technique in height measurements of mandibular bone in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:39-43. Verhoeven JW, Ruijter J, Cune MS, Terlou M. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and reproducibility of the technique in quantitative densitometric measurements of mandible in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:476-86. Melnik AK. A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:355-66. Janson GRP, Metaxas A, Woodside DG, Freitas MR, Pinzan A. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:406-18. Kyrkanides S, Richter L. Mandibular asymmetry and antigonial notching in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:30-5. Sakima MT. Comparative cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction. An implant study [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 1997. Castro AGB. Cephalometric study of the posterior anchorage unit in the canine retraction utilizing T loop, reverse vertical loop
39.
40.
41.
42.
43. 44.
45.
46.
47.
with helicoids and sliding mechanics [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 1997. Fuziy A. Cephalometric study of three types of canine retraction [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 1997. Terada HH. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment for deep overbite correction using the Ricketts method—an implant study [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 2001. Sakima PRT. Projection errors effects on the cephalometric measurements of the Steiner and McNamara analysis [dissertation]. Araraquara, Sa˜ o Paulo: University of Sa˜ o Paulo State, Brazil; 2001. Grayson BH, McCarthy TG, Bookstein F. Analysis of craniofacial asymmetry by multiplane cephalometry. Am J Orthod 1983;84:217-24. Cook JT. Asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton. Br J Orthod 1980;7:33-8. Baumrind S, Miller D, Molthen R. The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. Am J Orthod 1976; 70:617-44. Iseri H, Solow B. Average surface remodeling of the maxillary base and the orbital floor in female subjects from 8 to 25 years. An implant study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107: 48-57. Nielsen IL. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluations of growth and treatment change. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:422-31. Springate SD, Jones AG. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:263-69.
ESTATE PLANNING & PLANNED GIVING Estate Planning: The AAO Foundation offers information on estate planning to AAO members and their advisors on a complimentary basis and at no obligation. Planned giving: Persons who are contemplating a gift to the AAO Foundation through their estates are asked to contact the AAOF before proceeding. Please call (800) 424-2481, extension 246. Please remember the AAO Foundation in your estate planning.