Tcrmkdmn Lrtrrr. Vol. 36. No. 41. pp. 7357-7360. 1995 ElsevielscienceLtd Printedin GUI Britain
Pergamon
oa4c4039/% s9.50400
0040-4039(95)016554
Ethyl Trifluoroacetate: A Powerful Reagent for Differentiating Amino Groups Daqiang Xu, Kapa Prasad *, Oljan Repic, and Thomas J. Blacklock Chemical Research and Development, Technical R & D Sandor Research Institute, Sandoz Pharmaceutical Corporation, 59 Route IO, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA
Abstract:
Selective protection of primary aminesin the presenceof secondaryaminesand monofunctionatizadon of symmetric
primary and secondary diamines using ethyl trifluoroacetateis described. Effective differentiationof primary. secondary and tertiary alkyl-substituted primary amines from one another by ethyl trilluoroacetate acylation is also demonstrated. These result are explained on the basis of steric and electronic effects of the subwale amines.
The trifluoroacetyl
(Tfa) group has been widely used as an amine protecting
due to the ease of its removal under mild conditions. used
for this purp0se.t
Trifluoroacetic
group in organic synthesis
anhydride is the reagent
most widely
As this reagent is too reactive, all types of amino groups gets acylated under these
conditions. Ethyl trifluoroacetate. a mild trifuoroacetyl transferring agent. on the other hand was used in few instances for differentiating amino groups. 2 As there is no detailed study3 on the scope of this acyl transfer, we undertook a systematic investigation. and the details of these results are presented in this paper. We found that ttifluoroacetylation of primary amines can be conveniently achieved by simple mixing
of the amine and a stoichiomeuic amount of ethyl trifluoroacetate under neutral conditions at 0 T.
The
reaction normally goes to completion in a few minutes, and the product is isolated by evaporation of the solvent and the liberated ethanol. presence of secondary amines
H&
-NH2
These mild conditions offer exclusive primary amine acylation in the
as exemplified by equations 1 and 2.
I qcFgzooEl
HsC,
THF. 0 “c. IO min
#
WNHTfa
(Es J)
Ii >95%
# H2N-
mNH2
$o~~m;. . 7357
T,a,,,,,/\/
MeNHTfa
(Eq2)
The obsenred selectivity is attributed to the differences in steric demand of primary and secondary amincs in accotxiance with aminolysis of esters. 5 The steric influence of substituents on the amino group is clearly demons~ted
by competition experiments using r-. i-. and n-bu~~amines
(Eqs 3 & 4). The high
selectivity and mild conditions makes this trifluoroacetylation protocol a powerful tool for the differentiation of primary, secondary and tertiary alkyl-substituted primary amines.
H3+,NH~
H3k.+,JJH3
~~~CQOQO
e
H3eN”Tfa
+
H3vNHTf3 0%
+
CH3
l
H3C
CH3
Wi
31
H3C CH3
NH2 I eq CF$XOEt H3C-NH2
H3C-7’ +
dioxme, I5 “C
-
H3-NHTfa+
“3C’-fNHTfa
C”3
cEq4 CY
The reaction of ethyl trifluoroacetate with symmetric diamines is even mom interesting. selectivities are realized for mono-t~fluo~acetylation
Excellent
of all 1.2-diamines studied except for rrans-1,2-
diaminocyclohcxanc (see the Table). Even the highly reactive ethylenediamine offered moderate selectivity at 0 ‘C (entry 2). and the selectivity is improved IO the synthetically useful range of 12.6~1 (93% of mono- vs. 7% of bis-trifluoroacetate) when the acylation is run at -70 OC (entry 3). The stark differences in seiectivity among cis- and rranr-diaminocyclohexanes 4. 5, and 6).
and the 1.2-diphenylethylenediamine
While both cis-di~in~yclohexane
selectivity for mono-trifluoroacylation,
are most intriguing (entries
and 1,2-diphenylethyIenediamine
(runs-diaminocyclohexane
give extremely high
shows statistical distribution of all the
possible products in the reaction mixture after the addition of one equivalent of ethyl trifluoroacetate, with the starting diamine, the monoacylated product and the bisacylated product in the ratio of roughly 1:2:t. This clearly indicates the cooperative nature of the two nitmgens in the aminolysis i.e., general base catalysis by the other nitrogen via in~ol~~ar
hydrogen bonding likely accounting for the selectivity (see Scheme).6 When
the two nitrogens are farther apart, this intramolecular polarization becomes less entropically favored, and the attacking nitrogen also becomes more sterically crowded. This explains the reduced selectivities for mono~fluoroacetylation
in the series from ethylenediaminc,
entries 1,7,8 and 9).
propane&amine. piperazine to hexanediamine (c$
7359
Table substrate
EW
Mono/EWb
Rxn Temp
Solvents
H
1
HP-el-N-cna
2
3
H,N-
NHz
a
4
43.7
RT
THF
3.0
o”c
MeCN
12.6
-70 “C
EtOH
68.0
0°C
MeCNIEtOH
1.8
0°C
THF
o”c
THF
8.3
RT
THF
5.8
RT
THF
NH2 NH2
5
6
> load m H,C.NV
7
N.=“a
H
H
n MN
8 H,C.
9
Nr\ H
NH
/. w&)4
N-CH, ”
RT
a) The ratio of monouifluotwcylated product and the bistrifluoroacyliltcd product upon complete reaction with 1 equivalent of ethyl trifluoroacetatc;b) The ratioswcrc dctcrrnincdby GC usinga DEand were conficd
I column
by ‘H NMR spcc~ra after Ihe completion of tbc rcrtions: c) Solvents wcrc chosen
for solubility and GC considcntions; d) No funhcr rykion
was observed even wilh excess ethyl
lrifiuoroilcewtc.
Scheme:
(n = O,l,...)
7360
The intramolecular equations
catalysis assumption
5 and 6. The secondary
trifluoroacetylated
is further supported
by the competition
studies illustrated in
amino group in N.N’.N’-trimethylpropanediamine
over the one in N.N’-dimethylpropanediamine
probably
is more selectively
due to higher basicity of the
trimethyl analog.
Id
HsC’
C&t
-N’
HaC’ 1 q CFsccxxt
H
#
W
*N’ Tfa
MeCN. RT H&v
35.2
I
)
_
H,CvN/CH”
/CH3 w
(Eq 5) 1.0
I
ifa
(1:l)
CH3
HsK#m’ H3KN-NHCH3
H
I
H
Tfa
M&N, RT
H3kN/,,+.N/cH3
(Eq 6)
“3k.N~N/CH3
H
I
1.0
I
eqCFICCCEt
3.7
I
CH3
I
Tfa
CH3
(1:l)
In conclusion, trifluoroacetate
we have
for differentiating
to the steric and electronic
demonstrated
the
broad
scope
amino groups from one another.
of trifluoroacetylations
This trifluoroacetylation
influences of the amines and, therefore, promises
with
ethyl
is highly sensitive
a wide variety of applications
in
synthetic organic chemistry for selective amino group functionalizations. Rcfcrenccs and Notes: 1.
Green, T. W. and Wuts. P. G. M. Prorecrive Groups in Organic Synrhesis John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2.
(a) Mitchinson,
New York, 1991. 1994. 2613.
A; Gelding.
(b) Rizo, J.; Albericio.
Aviron-Violet. 3.
B.T.; Griffin, R.J.;
O’Sullivan. M. C. J. Chem. Sot., Gem.
F.; Giralt. E. and Pedroso. Terruhedron Lem. 1992.33,
finding
397. (c)
P. and GervaJs. C. US Patent 4943679.
Recently, O’Sullivan and Dalrymple reported (Terruhedron earlier
Commun.
(ref.
2 (a)) on the differentiation
Len. 1995.36.3451)
of primary
amines
the extension of th:ir
in spermidine
to other
polyamines. 4. 5.
The
products
(a) MC. Arnett,
obtained
as described
have
purities
of 1
98%.
determined
E.; Miller, J. G. and Day, A. R. J. Am. Chem. Sot. 1950, 72.5635.
73‘5393. 6.
Werner,
B. H. H. and Fischer,
E. 0. Anger. Chem. Int . Ed. Engl. 1968,7,817.
(Received in USA 5 July 1995;accepted 2 August 1995)
by tH
NMR.
(b) ibid, 1951,