Ets-1 upregulates HER2-induced MMP-1 expression in breast cancer cells

Ets-1 upregulates HER2-induced MMP-1 expression in breast cancer cells

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biochemical and Biophysical Researc...

603KB Sizes 30 Downloads 152 Views

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / y b b r c

Ets-1 upregulates HER2-induced MMP-1 expression in breast cancer cells Yeon Hee Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im * Divi­sion of Hema­tol­ogy-Oncol­ogy, Depart­ment of Med­i­cine, Sam­sung Med­i­cal Cen­ter, Sung­kyunk­wan Uni­ver­sity School of Med­i­cine, 50 Ir­won-Dong, Gang­nam-Gu, Seoul, Repub­lic of Korea Bio­med­i­cal Research Insti­tute, Sam­sung Med­i­cal Cen­ter, Sung­kyunk­wan Uni­ver­sity School of Med­i­cine, 50 Ir­won-Dong, Gang­nam-Gu, Seoul, Repub­lic of Korea

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Received 25 September 2008 Available online 11 October 2008  Key­words: Ets-1 HER2 MMP-1 Breast can­cer

a b s t r a c t The human epi­der­mal growth fac­tor recep­tor-2 (HER2) plays an impor­tant role in breast can­cer. Enhanced Ets-1 activ­ity has recently been shown to be asso­ci­ated with breast can­cer path­og ­ en­e­sis. To test the role of Ets-1 in breast can­cer cells in rela­tion to the expres­sion of HER2 and MMP-1, we tran­siently over­ex­ pres­sed Ets-1 and/or HER2 in MCF-7 breast can­cer cells and com­pre­hen­sively searched for genes related to HER2 and Ets-1 using cDNA micro­array anal­y­sis. The expres­sion of matrix metallo­pro­tein­ase (MMP) genes was enhanced by the over­ex­pres­sion of HER2/Ets-1. We ana­lyzed the rela­tion­ship between HER2induced MMP-1 expres­sion and the tran­scrip­tion fac­tor Ets-1, which has sig­nif­i­cant activ­ity in breast can­ cer path­og ­ en­es­ is. Our results dem­on­strate that HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion is pos­i­tively reg­u­lated by Ets-1 in breast can­cer cells. This study con­firms that Ets-1 is a down­stream effec­tor of onco­genic HER2, asso­ci­ated with MMP-1. © 2008 Else­vier Inc. All rights reserved.

The Ets pro­teins are expressed in both primary human breast can­cers and breast can­cer cell lines, and their expres­sion has been asso­ci­ated with dis­ease pro­gres­sion and metas­ta­sis [1,2]. Ets-1 is an inde­pen­dent prog­nos­tic marker for relapse-free sur­vival in breast can­cer, and has not been linked to other prog­nos­tic fac­tors, such as nodal sta­tus, tumor size, his­to­log­i­cal grade, or estro­gen recep­tor sta­tus [1]. The degree of Ets-1 expres­sion cor­re­lates with the extent of breast car­ci­noma inva­sion, and the atyp­ism of the car­ci­noma cor­re­lates sig­nif­i­cantly with Ets-1 expres­sion [3]. Ets-1 has also been shown to be cor­re­lated pos­i­tively with HER2 expres­ sion, which is a rep­re­sen­ta­tive prog­nos­tic and pre­dic­tive marker of breast can­cer [4]. Sev­eral other func­tional roles of Ets-1 in tumor­ i­gen­e­sis of breast can­cer have also been pos­tu­lated. Ets-1 reg­u­ lates the expres­sion of genes encod­ing enzymes involved in the deg­ra­da­tion of the extra­cel­lu­lar matrix, such as MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-7, and MMP-9 [5]. MMP-1 and MMP-9 are involved in the 70 genes that iden­tify the “gene-expres­sion sig­na­ture” which pre­dicts dis­tant metas­ta­sis in lymph-node-neg­at­ ive breast can­cer patients [6,7]. MMPs have been impli­cated in nor­mal matrix remod­el­ing events and path­o­log­i­cal con­di­tions, includ­ing tumor inva­sion and metas­ta­sis [7]. Abnor­mal­i­ties in growth fac­tor sig­nal­ing path­ ways play an intrin­sic role in dis­ease pro­gres­sion. In humans, the growth fac­tor recep­tor HER2 is over­ex­pres­sed in 20–30% of breast can­cers and over­ex­pres­sion of HER2 is asso­ci­ated with enhanced tumor­i­ge­nic­ity and pro­pen­sity to metas­ta­size and resis­tance to * Cor­re­spond­ing author. Address: Divi­sion of Hema­tol­ogy-Oncol­ogy, Depart­ment of Med­i­cine, Sam­sung Med­i­cal Cen­ter, Sung­kyunk­wan Uni­ver­sity School of Med­i­ cine, 50 Ir­won-Dong, Gang­nam-Gu, Seoul, Repub­lic of Korea. Fax: +82 2 3410 1757. E-mail address: [email protected] (Y.-H. Im). 0006-291X/$ - see front matter © 2008 Else­vier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.135

endo­crine ther­apy [8,9]. The tar­get­ing of HER2 as a ther­a­peu­tic strat­egy for patients with HER2 over­express­ing breast can­cer has already shown sur­vival advan­tage when com­bined with many che­ mo­ther­a­peu­tic agents [10]. Assum­ing that the action of HER2 is related to Ets-1, we tran­siently over­ex­pres­sed Ets-1 and/or HER2 in MCF-7 breast can­cer cells and com­pre­hen­sively searched for genes related to HER2 and Ets-1 using cDNA micro­array anal­y­sis. The expres­sion of metallo­pro­tein­ase (MMP) genes was enhanced by the over­ex­pres­sion of HER2/Ets-1. Our cDNA micro­array anal­y­ sis showed that MMP genes are asso­ci­ated with the action of HER2 and Ets-1. We won­dered whether Ets-1 could thus poten­tially func­tion as a down­stream effec­tor of onco­genic HER2 in asso­ci­a­ tion with MMP-1. Based on this knowl­edge, we were inter­ested in the rela­tion­ships between MMP-1, HER2, and Ets-1 in breast can­ cer. We hypoth­es­ ized that HER2 induces MMP-1 expres­sion and Ets-1 coop­er­ates with this func­tion. Here, we per­formed reverse tran­scrip­tion-poly­mer­ase chain reac­tion (RT-PCR), western blot anal­y­sis, an MMP-1 enzyme-linked immu­no­sor­bent assay (ELISA), and an MMP-1 pro­moter assay after trans­fect­ing the MCF-7 human breast can­cer cell line with HER2. We then inves­ti­gated how Ets-1 influ­ences the MMP-1 expres­sion induced by HER2. Mate­ri­als and meth­ods Anti­bod­ies and reagents. Anti-Ets-1 and anti-HER2 were pur­ chased from Santa Cruz Bio­tech­nol­ogy (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-bactin was pur­chased from Sigma (Salt Lake City, UT). Anti-MMP-1 was pur­chased from Cal­bio­chem (Cam­bridge, MA). Trast­uzumab (Her­cep­tin®) and Erl­oti­nib (Tarc­eva®) were pro­vided by Roche

390

Y.H. Park et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394

Korea. MMP ELISA kits were obtained from R&D Sys­tems. [c-32P] ATP was pur­chased from NEN Life Sci­ence Prod­ucts (Bos­ton, MA). Tumor cell lines and cul­ture. The human breast can­cer cell line MCF-7 was cul­tured and main­tained in RPMI 1640 medium (Bio­ Whit­tak­er, Walk­ers­ville, MD) sup­ple­mented with 10% fetal bovine serum, pen­i­cil­lin, and strep­to­my­cin. Tran­sient and sta­ble trans­fec­tion of MCF-7 cells with HER2 and Ets-1. An expres­sion vec­tor for FLAG-tagged Ets-1 con­structs was gen­er­ated by sub­clon­ing PCR-ampli­fied cDNA into the G418-resis­ tance plas­mid pcDNA3.1. HER2/pCMV6–XL4 con­structs were pur­ chased from Ori­gene. The HER2/pCMV6–XL4 plas­mid was digested with the restric­tion enzyme Not1 to release the inserted frag­ment. The frag­ment was re-sub­cloned into the G418-resis­tance plas­mid pcDNA3.1 (Invit­ro­gen) at the Not1 site. MCF-7 cells were tran­ siently trans­fec­ted using Ef­fec­ten­e Trans­fec­tion Reagent (Qiagen Inc., Valen­cia, CA). MCF-7 cells were sta­bly trans­fec­ted with either the HER2/pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1 vec­tor in the pres­ence of Ef­fec­ ten­e Trans­fec­tion Reagent for 48 h and were treated with 500 lg/ mL G418. RNA iso­la­tion and micro­array anal­y­sis. The enriched plasma cells were stored in RNA­lat­er (Am­bi­on) for RNA extrac­tion and gene chip exper­i­ments. RNA was iso­lated with an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valen­cia, CA) and the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valen­cia, CA). After cleanup with a Sam­ple Cleanup Mod­ule (Af­fyme­trix), the dou­blestranded cDNA was used for in vitro tran­scrip­tion. After cleanup with a Sam­ple Cleanup Mod­ule (Af­fyme­trix), 10–15 lg of labeled cRNA was frag­mented into 35–200 bp lengths in frag­men­ta­tion buffer (Af­fyme­trix). The frag­mented cRNA was hybrid­ized to the Human Genome U133A 2.0 gene chip (Af­fyme­trix) at 45 °C for 16 h. After hybrid­iza­tion, the arrays were washed in a Gene­Chip Flu­id­ ics Sta­tion 450 with a non­strin­gent wash buffer at 25 °C, fol­lowed

by a strin­gent wash buffer at 50 °C. After wash­ing, the arrays were stained with a strep­ta­vi­din–phy­co­er­yt­ hrin com­plex. After stain­ing, the inten­si­ties were deter­mined with a Gene­Chip Scan­ner 3000 (Af­fyme­trix). Data anal­y­sis. Expres­sion pro­files were ana­lyzed using the Gene­Chip Oper­at­ing Soft­ware (Af­fyme­trix). Trans­fec­tion of Stealth RNAi. Ets-1 Val­i­dated Stealth™ RNAi Du­oP­ak and ERBB2 Stealth™ Select 3 RNAi were pur­chased from Invit­ro­gen. MCF-7 cells were tran­siently trans­fec­ted using Lipo­ fect­amine™ RNAi­MAX (Invit­ro­gen). Prep­a­ra­tion of pro­moter–reporter con­structs. A pro­moter frag­ ment of the human MMP-1 gene, from ¡4334 to +5218 rel­a­tive to the tran­scrip­tion start point, was ampli­fied from human DNA by PCR, using a pair of prim­ers (59-a­gat­gtaagagctgggaaaggacgg-39/59tcagtgcaaggtaagtgatggcttc-39) and Ac­cu­prime Pfx DNA poly­mer­ase (Invit­ro­gen). The frag­ment was sub­cloned into the pCR–XL–TOPO vec­tor (Invit­ro­gen) for prop­a­ga­tion in bac­te­ria. The iso­lated plas­ mid was digested with the restric­tion enzymes MluI and XhoI to release the inserted frag­ment. The frag­ment was re-sub­cloned in the sense ori­en­ta­tion into the pro­moter-free pGL3-Basic vec­tor (Promega) at the MluI and XhoI sites in the 59 flank­ing region of the lucif­er­ase sequence. Iso­la­tion of RNA and RT-PCR. Total cel­lu­lar RNA was iso­lated using TRI­zol™ Reagent (Gib­co BRL, Carls­bad, CA). For RT-PCR, 2 lg of RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase, and cDNA was obtained using the Super­Script™ III First-Strand Syn­the­sis Sys­tem for RT-PCR. The cDNA was ampli­fied by PCR. The prim­ers used in this anal­y­sis are shown in Sup­ple­men­tal Table 1. Western blot anal­y­sis. Cells were extracted with RIPA buffer. The sam­ples were placed on ice for 20 min with occa­sional vor­texing. Pro­tein con­cen­tra­tions were deter­mined using the BCA Pro­tein

Fig. 1. HER2 over­ex­pres­sion increases MMP-1 expres­sion in MCF-7 cells. (A) MCF-7 cells were trans­fec­ted with pcDNA3.1(+) or HER2/pcDNA3.1(+) for 24 h. The mRNA expres­ sion of HER2 and MMP-1 ana­lyzed by RT-PCR. (B) At 48 h post-trans­fec­tion, the con­di­tioned medium was sub­jected to ELISA to quan­tify secreted MMP-1. Data were shown as means ± SD from three sep­a­rate exper­i­ments. *P < 0.05 com­pared with the Vec­tor group. (C) MCF-7 cells were co-trans­fec­ted with MMP-1 pro­moter-reporter con­struct together with empty expres­sion vec­tor or with expres­sion plas­mid for HER2. The cel­lu­lar lucif­er­ase activ­ity was mea­sured. Data were shown as means ± SD from three sep­a­ rate exper­im ­ ents. ***P < 0.0005 com­pared with the con­trol group. (D) MCF-7 cells were sta­bly trans­fec­ted with HER2 expres­sion vec­tor. The expres­sion of HER2 was ana­lyzed by immu­no­blot­ting. b-Actin was used as a load­ing con­trol. (E) MMP-1 mRNA expres­sion was increased in MCF-7/HER2 clones. †The molec­u­lar sizes of dif­fer­ent bands: b-actin 331 bp; HER2 281 bp; MMP-1 444 bp.



Y.H. Park et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394

Assay Kit (Pierce). Equal amounts of sam­ple were sub­jected to SDS–PAGE. Mem­branes were incu­bated for 2 h then, incu­bated with primary anti­body for 2 h. After sev­eral washes in PBS and incu­ba­tion with horse­rad­ish-per­ox­i­dase-con­ju­gated sec­ond­ary anti­bod­ies (Zymed), bound primary anti­bod­ies were detected with ECL chemi­lu­mi­nes­cent reagents (Amersham). ELISA of secreted MMP-1. MMP-1 secreted from MCF-7 cells was quan­ti­fied using the Human Pro-MMP-1 ELISA kit (R&D Sys­tems). The absor­bance at 450 nm was mea­sured with a spec­tro­pho­to­met­ ric plate reader. Lucif­er­ase assays. MCF-7 cells were tran­siently trans­fec­ted with the reporter con­structs using Ef­fec­ten­e Trans­fec­tion Reagent. After trans­fec­tion, whole-cell lysates were prepared and lucif­er­ase activ­ ity was mea­sured using a lucif­er­ase activ­ity assay kit (Promega). Prep­a­ra­tion of nuclear pro­tein extracts. The washed cells were scraped from the cul­ture plates and col­lected by cen­tri­fu­ga­tion. The pel­lets were resus­pended in 0.4 mL of hypo­tonic lysis buffer. After 15 min on ice, Non­idet P-40 was added to a final con­cen­tra­ tion of 0.5%, and the cells were vor­texed for 10 s and cen­tri­fuged (30 s, 4 °C, 12,000g). The super­na­tant was fro­zen imme­di­ately and the nuclear pel­lets were resus­pended in 130 lL of buffer and vor­ texed for 30 min at 4 °C. After cen­tri­fu­ga­tion (5 min, 4 °C, 12,000g), the super­na­tant was fro­zen at ¡70 °C. Immu­no­pre­cip­it­ a­tion assays. At 24 h after incu­ba­tion on 60-mm Petri dishes, cells were extracted with lysis buffer. After the lysates had been pre­cleared with Pro­tein-A/G PLUS-Aga­rose, 2 lg HER2 mono­clo­nal anti­bod­ies (Cal­bio­chem) or EGFR (bio­source) and Pro­tein-A/G PLUS-Aga­rose were added and incu­bated over­night at 4 °C on a rotat­ing wheel. Immu­no­com­plexes were col­lected by cen­tri­fu­ga­tion, washed five times with lysis buffer, sep­a­rated by SDS–PAGE.

391

Sta­tis­ti­cal anal­y­sis. Stu­dent’s T-test was done to deter­mine sta­ tis­ti­cal sig­nif­i­cance for ELISA and lucif­er­ase assay. Results cDNA micro­array revealed that MMP genes are related to the action of HER2 and Ets-1 To iden­tify genes bio­log­i­cally related to HER2 and Ets-1 activ­ity in breast can­cer cells, we ana­lyzed the expres­sion pro­files of cells after trans­fec­tion with HER2 and/or Ets-1 in MCF breast can­cer cell using the cDNA micro­array method. The expres­sion pro­files showed high expres­sion of MMP’s and col­la­ge­nase genes in the cell trans­fec­ted with HER2 and Ets-1, sug­gest­ing that these genes were closely asso­ci­ated with the inter­ac­tion of HER2 and Ets-1 (Sup­ple­ men­tal Table 2). Induc­tion by HER2 of MMP-1 expres­sion and pro­moter activ­ity To deter­mine whether HER2 is involved in the reg­u­la­tion of MMP-1 expres­sion and pro­moter activ­ity, HER2-trans­fec­ted MCF-7 breast can­cer cells were incu­bated, and RT-PCR with MMP-1 spe­ cific prim­ers and Western immu­no­blot­ting were per­formed (Fig. 1A). Tran­sient over­ex­pres­sion of HER2 gene led to an enhance­ment of MMP-1 mRNA expres­sion lev­els. We also quan­ti­fied the MMP-1 secreted from MCF-7 cells using an ELISA, and the MMP-1 pro­ moter activ­ity was ana­lyzed by mea­sur­ing the lucif­er­ase activ­ity (Fig. 1B and C). Fig. 1A shows that the expres­sion of MMP-1 mRNA was upreg­u­lated after trans­fec­tion of cells with HER2. We used western immu­no­blot­ting anal­y­sis to deter­mine if the observed increase in MMP-1 mRNA tran­scrip­tion cor­re­lated with MMP-1

Fig. 2. Down-reg­u­la­tion of HER2 inhib­its HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion. (A) To knock down HER2 expres­sion in MCF-7/HER2-14 cells, the cells were trans­fec­ted with con­trol siR­NA oligo or three dif­fer­ent siR­NA oli­gos against HER2. RNA was col­lected 48 h after trans­fec­tion. The mRNA expres­sion of HER2 and MMP-1 were ana­lyzed by RTPCR. (B) ELISA was per­formed to assess the effects of dif­fer­ent kinds of HER2 siR­NA on MMP-1 expres­sion. (1 lane, MCF-7/Vec­tor; 2–9 lane, MCF-7/HER2-14; NC, neg­a­tive con­trol siR­NA). *P < 0.05 com­pared with the MCF-7HER2-14 group; **P < 0.01 com­pared with the MCF-7HER2-14 group. (C) MCF-7/HER2-14 cells were incu­bated in medium sup­ple­mented with Trast­uzumab at 10 lg/ml for 48 h. Cell lysates were prepared and immu­no­blot­ted with HER2 and b-actin. b-Actin was used as a load­ing con­trol. MMP-1 expres­sion was ana­lyzed by RT-PCR. (D) The con­di­tioned medium was sub­jected to ELISA to quan­tify secreted MMP-1. §P < 0.005 com­pared with the MCF-7/HER2-14 con­trol group. The exper­i­ment was rep­li­cated three times.

392

Y.H. Park et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394

pro­tein expres­sion. Fig. 1B shows the strongly aug­mented expres­ sion of MMP-1 pro­tein rel­a­tive to that before the trans­fec­tion of cells with HER2. Fig. 1C shows enhanced MMP-1 pro­moter activ­ity by HER2. Fig. 1D shows the expres­sion of HER2 by Western blot­ ting. MMP-2 mRNA expres­sion was increased in sev­eral MCF-7/ HER2 clones (Fig. 1E).

Actin expres­sion was unaf­fected by either con­trol or HER2 siR­NA treat­ment, indi­cat­ing that non-spe­cific down-reg­u­la­tion did not occur. This result was quan­ti­fied by ELISA (Fig. 2B). Trast­uzumab, HER2-tar­get­ing agent, inhib­its HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion (Fig. 2C and D). This find­ing con­firmed MMP-1 upreg­u­la­tion by HER2.

Sta­ble trans­fec­tion of HER2 into the MCF-7 breast can­cer cell line

EGFR tyro­sine kinase inhib­it­ or inhib­its (TKI) ligand-induced phos­phor­y­la­tion of EGFR, HER2 and HER2/EGFR and MMP-1

To test the effi­ciency of HER2 trans­fec­tion into MCF-7 cells, we com­pared the HER2 expres­sion pro­file with that of MCF-7 cells trans­fec­ted with the G418-resis­tance plas­mid pcDNA3.1. We also com­pared it with that of cells trans­fec­ted with HER2 Stealth RNAi (50 mg or 100 mg). HER2 mRNA expres­sion was mark­edly increased in MCF-7 cells after trans­fec­tion with HER2 when ana­lyzed by RTPCR. The abil­ity of small inter­fer­ing RNA (siR­NA) of HER2 to sup­ press HER2 expres­sion was con­firmed by RT-PCR. We deter­mined the effect of HER2 siR­NA at dif­fer­ent doses on HER2 expres­sion in MCF-7 cells, which indi­cated that HER2 expres­sion was blocked by HER2 siR­NA treat­ment (Fig. 2A). Down-reg­u­la­tion of HER2 inhib­its HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion siR­NA to HER2 pro­vide fur­ther evi­dence for the positive reg­u­ la­tory role of HER2 in the reg­u­la­tion of MMP-1 (Fig. 2A). The abil­ ity of HER2 siR­NA to sup­press MMP-1 expres­sion was per­formed by RT-PCR. RNA was col­lected 48 h after trans­fec­tion. The mRNA expres­sion of HER2 and MMP-1 were down-reg­u­lated in accor­ dance with increas­ing HER2-spe­cific siR­NA by three kinds of siR­NA.

We inves­ti­gated whether erl­oti­nib, EGFR TKI, inhib­its HER2induced MMP-1 over­ex­pres­sion. The phos­phor­y­la­tion of EGFR and HER2 in MCF-7/HER2 was ana­lyzed by immu­no­blot­ting (Fig. 3A). Immu­no­pre­cip­i­ta­tion in Fig. 3B indi­cated that HER2 has increased asso­ci­ated with EGFR in MCF-7/HER2-14. To exam­ine the inhib­i­tory effect of erl­oti­nib on phos­phor­y­la­tion of EGFR and HER2 in MCF-7/ HER2 cells, MCF-7/HER2-14 cells were treated with erl­oti­nib with indi­cated con­cen­tra­tions for 24 h. fol­lowed by immu­no­blot­ting for the indi­cated pro­teins. As shown in Fig. 3C, HER2 expres­sion was decreased in a con­cen­tra­tion-depen­dent man­ner. The mRNA expres­sion of MMP-1 was decreased after erl­oti­nib treat­ment in con­cen­tra­tion-depen­dent man­ner by RT-PCR (Fig. 3D). Ets-1 enhances HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion We inves­ti­gated whether MMP-1, which was acti­vated with HER2, is affected by Ets-1 treat­ment in MCF-7 cells. After treat­ ment with Ets-1, MMP-1 mRNA expres­sion was enhanced in estab­ lished a sta­ble MCF-7 cell line trans­fec­ted with either Ets-1 or

Fig. 3. Erl­oti­nib inhib­its HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion. (A) Expres­sion lev­els of EGFR and HER2 phos­phor­y­la­tion in MCF-7/HER2 clones. Cell lysates were prepared and ana­lyzed by immu­no­blot­ting using the indi­cated anti­bod­ies. b-Actin was used as a load­ing con­trol. (B) HER2 has increased asso­ci­a­tion with EGFR in MCF-7/HER2-14. MCF-7/Vec­tor and MCF-7/HER2-14 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer. HER2 or EGFR in 0.5 mg cell lysate was immu­no­pre­cip­i­tated. The immu­no­pre­cip­i­tates were frac­tion­ated on SDS–PAGE fol­lowed by immu­no­blot­ting for the indi­cated pro­teins. (C) Erl­oti­nib inhib­its EGFR and HER2 phos­phor­y­la­tion in MCF-7/HER2-14. MCF-7/HER2-14 cells were treated with erl­oti­nib for 24 h. Cell lysates were ana­lyzed by immu­no­blot­ting. b-Actin was used as a load­ing con­trol. (D) The mRNA expres­sion of MMP-1 and HER2 ana­lyzed by RT-PCR. The exper­i­ment was rep­li­cated three times.



Y.H. Park et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394

393

Fig. 4. The effect of Ets-1 on HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion. (A) HER2 and Ets-1 enhance expres­sion of the MMP-1. MCF-7 cells were tran­siently trans­fec­ted with expres­ sion plas­mids for HER2 (2 lg) or Ets-1 (2 lg). (B) MCF-7 cells were co-trans­fec­ted with MMP-1 pro­moter-reporter con­struct together with expres­sion plas­mid for HER2 or with expres­sion plas­mid for Ets-1. The cel­lu­lar lucif­er­ase activ­ity was mea­sured. Data were shown as means ± SD from three sep­a­rate exper­i­ments. *P < 0.05 com­pared with the pcDNA group; ***P < 0.005 com­pared with the pcDNA group. (C) HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion was inhib­ited by Ets-1 siR­NA in MDA-MB-231 cells. To knock down Ets-1 expres­sion in MDA-MB-231 cells, the cells were trans­fec­ted with con­trol siR­NA oligo or two dif­fer­ent siR­NA oli­gos against Ets-1. The expres­sion of Ets-1 was ana­lyzed by immu­no­blot­ting. b-Actin was used as a load­ing con­trol. RNA was b-actin was used as a load­ing con­trol. RNA was col­lected 48 h after trans­fec­tion. The mRNA expres­sion of Ets-1 and MMP-1 ana­lyzed by RT-PCR.

HER2, as detected by RT–PCR (Fig. 4A). MMP-1 lev­els increased rel­a­tive to those before the addi­tion of Ets-1, as deter­mined by ELISA (Fig. 4B). The effect of Ets-1 siR­NA in sup­press­ing MMP-1 expres­sion was con­firmed by RT-PCR and Western blot­ting in MDA-MB-231 cells, which over­ex­press HER2. When MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with Ets-1 siR­NA, Ets-1 expres­sion was blocked and MMP-1 expres­sion was inhib­ited (Fig. 4C). The expres­sion of MMP-1 was down-reg­u­lated by the addi­tion of Ets-1 siR­NA to the MDA-MB-231 cell line. Dis­cus­sion In this study, we tested the role of Ets-1 in breast can­cer cells in rela­tion to the expres­sion of HER2 and MMP-1. HER2 over­ex­pres­ sion in breast can­cer cells are known to be poor prog­nos­tic ­mark­ers and are strong pre­dic­tors of ben­e­fit from treat­ment with HER2tar­get­ing agents [11]. Fur­ther­more, sev­eral recent clin­i­cal stud­ies have reported that the sta­tus of HER2 in the tumor can pre­dict the results of other breast can­cer treat­ments, includ­ing cyto­toxic che­ mo­ther­ap ­ eu­tic agents and endo­crine treat­ments [12,13]. After the dis­cov­ery of the HER2-directed ther­a­peu­tic strat­egy, its avail­abil­ ity strongly affected the treat­ment and clin­i­cal research of breast can­cer [14,15]. Despite of the fail­ure of MMP inhi­bi­tion strat­e­gies in many clin­i­cal tri­als [16,17], MMPs are impor­tant con­trib­u­tors to tumor pro­gres­sion and pro­vided the ratio­nale for devel­op­ ing new can­cer drugs that tar­geted MMP activ­ity. Unfor­tu­nately, there is still lack of the knowl­edge in the con­tri­bu­tion of MMPs to the ­pro­gres­sion of spe­cific can­cer types, stages and appro­pri­ ate tools for eval­u­at­ing MMP inhib­it­ ors. Our results showed that MMP-1 was over­ex­pres­sed in HER2 trans­fec­ted breast can­cer cells

(Figs. 1 and 2). It is pos­tu­lated that MMP-1 could func­tion in breast can­cer in rela­tion to HER2, which is already known as tar­get against breast can­cer. Inter­est­ingly, erl­oti­nib (EGFR tyro­sine kinase inhib­i­ tor) treat­ment as well as trast­uzumab (HER2 human­ized mono­clo­ nal anti­body) resulted in inhi­bi­tion of MMP-1, HER2 and ligandinduced phos­phor­y­la­tion of EGFR, HER2 and HER2/EGFR (Fig. 3). It strongly sug­gests that MMP-1 can be a rational ther­a­peu­tic tar­get for breast can­cer with new insight for EGFR in rela­tion to HER2. In addi­tion, we tested the role of Ets-1 using HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion. Ets pro­teins are a fam­ily of mito­gen-acti­vated pro­tein kinase (MAPK)-depen­dent tran­scrip­tion fac­tors that have been impli­cated as down­stream effec­tors of HER2 sig­nal­ing [18]. Con­ sid­er­ing the asso­ci­a­tion between Ets-1 and the inva­sive­ness and metas­ta­sis of breast can­cer [1–3], it also was pos­tu­lated that Ets-1 could affect HER2 activ­ity in breast can­cer. How­ever, this remained uncer­tain. Ets-1 is also required for the acti­va­tion of sev­eral genes involved in angi­o­gen­es­ is and extra­cel­lu­lar matrix remod­el­ing in breast can­cer [19]. Fur­ther­more, Ets-1 is involved in the upreg­u­ la­tion of MMP-1 gene expres­sion as well [2]. Based on our cDNA micro­array anal­y­sis, we fur­ther clar­i­fied the rela­tion­ship between MMPs and the actions of HER2 and Ets-1. The pur­pose of this study was to iden­tify the role of Ets-1 in breast can­cer as it relates to HER2 and MMP-1. First, we tested whether HER2 stim­u­lates MMP-1 expres­sion in MCF-7 breast can­cer cells. MMP-1 expres­sion showed a lin­ear cor­re­la­tion with HER2 trans­fec­tion in a time- and con­cen­tra­tion-depen­dent man­ ner, which may have resulted from the col­lab­o­ra­tive acti­va­tion of HER2 and MMP-1 pro­tein expres­sion. Trast­uzumab and erl­ oti­nib abol­ished the MMP-1 expres­sion stim­u­lated by HER2. We have clearly dem­on­strated that Ets-1 enhances the HER2-induced

394

Y.H. Park et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377 (2008) 389–394

expres­sion of MMP-1 (Fig. 4). There­fore, Ets-1 may have clin­i­cal util­ity as a new tar­get in breast can­cer ther­apy, in coop­er­a­tion with HER2 and MMP-1. It sug­gests that MMP-1 has its role for breast can­cer in rela­tion with HER2 and Ets-1. We found no cor­re­la­tion with other MMPs. Recently, other HER2-tar­get­ing agents apart from Trast­uzumab have shown activ­ity against breast can­cer. Our results indi­cate that MMP-1 expres­sion can exag­ger­ated by HER2 in MCF-7 breast can­cer cells, and Ets-1 could affect HER2-induced MMP-1 expres­sion. There might be an asso­ci­a­tion and inter­ac­tion between Ets-1 and HER2 through MMP-1. These rela­tions require fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion, espe­cially to a detailed anal­y­sis for its action mech­a­nism and clin­i­cal rel­e­vance to breast can­cer. Acknowl­edg­ment This work was sup­ported by the Sam­sung Bio­med­ic­ al Research Insti­tute Grant #SBRI C-A6-423-1. Appen­dix A. Sup­ple­men­tary data Sup­ple­men­tary data asso­ci­ated with this arti­cle can be found, in the online ver­sion, at doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.135. Ref­er­ences [1] P.N. Span, P. Mand­ers, J.J. Heu­vel, C.M. Thomas, R.R. Bos­ch, L.V. Beex, C.G. Sweep, Expres­sion of the tran­scrip­tion fac­tor Ets-1 is an inde­pen­dent prog­ nos­tic marker for relapse-free sur­vival in breast can­cer, Onco­gene 21 (2002) 8506–8509. [2] T. Shep­herd, J.A. Has­sell, Role of Ets tran­scrip­tion fac­tors in mam­mary gland devel­op­ment and onco­gen­es­ is, J. Mam­mary Gland Biol. Neo­pla­sia 6 (2001) 129–140. [3] E. Myers, A.D.K. Hill, G. Kelly, E.W. McDer­mott, N.J. O’Hig­gins, Y. Buggy, L.S. Young, Asso­ci­a­tions and inter­ac­tions between Ets-1 and Ets-2 and coreg­u­ la­tory pro­teins, SRC-1, AIB1, and NCoR in breast can­cer, Clin. Can­cer Res. 11 (2005) 2111–2122. [4] S. Ka­tay­ama, T. Na­kay­ama, M. Ito, S. Na­i­to, I. Se­line, Expres­sion of the ets-1 proto-onco­gene in human breast car­ci­noma: dif­fer­en­tial expres­sion with his­ to­log­i­cal grad­ing and growth pattern, His­tol. His­to­pa­thol. 20 (2005) 119–126. [5] V.I. Se­me­ntchenko, D.K. Wat­son, Ets tar­get genes: past, pres­ent and future, Onco­gene 19 (2000) 6533–6548. [6] L.J. van’t Veer, H.Y. Dai, M.J. van de Vij­ver, Y.D. He, A.A. Hart, M. Mao, H.L. Pe­terse, K. van der Kooy, M.J. Mar­ton, A.T. Wit­tev­een, G.J. Schre­ib ­ er, R.M. Ker­

kho­ven, C. Rob­erts, P.S. Lins­ley, R. Ber­nards, S.H. Friend, Gene expres­sion pro­ fil­ing pre­dicts clin­i­cal out­come of breast can­cer, Nature 415 (2002) 530–536. [7] V. Cha­bott­aux, A. Noel, Breast can­cer pro­gres­sion: insights into mul­ti­fac­eted matrix metallo­pro­tein­ases, Clin. Exp. Metas­ta­sis 24 (2007) 647–656. [8] D.J. Slamon, G.M. Clark, S.G. Wong, W.J. Levin, A. Ull­ric, W.L. McGu­ire, Human breast can­cer: cor­re­la­tion of relapse and sur­vival with ampli­fi­ca­tion of the HER2/neu onco­gene, Sci­ence 244 (1987) 707–712. [9] C. Wright, S. Nich­ol­son, B. Angus, J.R. Sains­bury, J. Farn­don, J. Cairns, A.L. Har­ ris, C.H. Horne, Rela­tion­ship between c-erbB-2 pro­tein prod­uct expres­sion and response to endo­crine ther­apy in advanced breast can­cer, Br. J. Can­cer 65 (1992) 118–121. [10] M. De Lau­ren­tiis, G. Can­cel­lo, L. Zin­no, E. Monta­gna, L. Mal­or­ni, A. Es­pos­i­to, R. Pen­nac­chio, L. Silv­es­tro, M. Gi­u­li­ano, A. Gi­ord­ano, F. Cap­uto, A. Ac­cur­so, S. De Placido, Tar­get­ing HER2 as a ther­a­peu­tic strat­egy for breast can­cer: a par­ a­dig­matic shift of drug devel­op­ment in oncol­ogy, Ann. Oncol. Sup­pl. 4 (2005) iv7–iv13. [11] R.D. Mass, M.F. Press, S. Ander­son, M.A. Cob­leigh, C.L. Vo­gel, N. Dyb­dal, G. Lei­ber­man, D.J. Slamon, Eval­u­a­tion of clin­i­cal out­comes accord­ing to HER2 detec­tion by fluo­res­cence in situ hybrid­iza­tion in women with met­a­static breast can­cer treated with Trast­uzumab, Clin. Breast Can­cer 6 (2005) 240– 246. [12] D.F. Hayes, A.D. Thor, L.G. Dress­ler, D. Weaver, S. Edg­er­ton, D. Cowan, G. Broad­ water, L.J. Gold­stein, S. Mar­ti­no, J.N. Ingle, I.C. Hen­der­son, L. Nor­ton, E.P. Winer, C.A. Hu­dis, M.J. Ellis, D.A. Berry, Can­cer and leu­ke­mia group B (CAL­GB) inves­ ti­ga­tors: HER2 and response to pac­lit­axel in node-positive breast can­cer, N. Engl. J. Med. 357 (2007) 1496–1506. [13] E. Aza­mbuja, V. Dur­becq, D.D. Rosa, M. Col­o­zza, D. Larsi­mont, M. Pic­cart-Geb­ hart, F. Car­doso, HER2 over­ex­pres­sion/ampli­fi­ca­tion and its inter­ac­tion with tax­ane-based ther­apy in breast can­cer, Ann. Oncol. 19 (2008) 223–232. [14] M.A. Cob­leigh, C.L. Vo­gel, D. Tri­pa­thy, N.J. Rob­ert, S. Scholl, L. Feh­renb­ach­er, J.M. Wol­ter, V. Paton, S. Shak, G. Lie­ber­man, D.J. Slamon, Multinational study of the effi­cacy and safety of human­ized anti-HER2 mono­clo­nal anti­body in women who have HER2-over­express­ing met­a­static breast can­cer that has pro­ gressed after che­mo­ther­apy for met­a­static dis­ease, J. Clin. Oncol. 17 (1999) 2639–2648. [15] D.J. Slamon, B. Ley­land-Jones, S. Shak, H. Fuchs, V. Paton, A. Ba­ja­monde, T. Flem­ing, W. Eier­mann, J. Wol­ter, M. Pe­gram, J. Base­lga, L. Nor­ton, Use of che­ mo­ther­apy plus a mono­clo­nal anti­body against HER2 for met­a­static breast can­cer that over­ex­press­es HER2, N. Engl. J. Med. 344 (2001) 783–792. [16] L.M. Cous­sens, B. Fin­gle­ton, L.M. Mat­ri­sian, Matrix metallo­pro­tein­ase inhib­i­ tors and can­cer: tri­als and tri­bu­tions, Sci­ence 295 (2002) 2387–2392. [17] C.M. Over­all, C. Lo­pez-Otin, Strat­eg ­ ies for MMP inhi­bi­tion in can­cer: inno­va­ tions for the post-trial era, Nat. Rev. Can­cer 2 (2002) 657–672. [18] C.K. Ga­lang, J.J. Gar­cia-Ra­mirez, P.A. Sol­ski, J.K. West­wick, C.J. Der, N.N. Nez­na­ nov, R.G. Oshi­ma, C.A. Ha­us­er, Onco­genic Neu/ErbB-2 increases Ets, AP-1 and NF-jB-depen­dent gene expres­sion and inhib­it­ing Ets acti­va­tion blocks neumed­i­ated cel­lu­lar trans­for­ma­tion, J. Biol. Chem. 271 (1996) 7992–7998. [19] J. West­er­marck, A. Seth, V.M. Kähäri, Dif­fer­en­tial reg­u­la­tion of inter­sti­tial col­ la­ge­nase (MMP-1) gene expres­sion by ETS tran­scrip­tion fac­tors, Onco­gene 14 (1997) 2651–2660.