Europe at the margins: New mosaics of inequality

Book reviews

526 raphies,

there

is repetition

are some

sloppily

example.

is Rowkmds,

of material,

formed

and there

European

Here,

cased here

sentences.

echoing

Hhabha.

for

whom

hc has cited earlier: People like Ngdngo [an informant] represent the nation-space in Cameroon as a double mo\‘ement turned into 3 coherent iclentity when in fact it is in the movement of the signifiation that the amhi\cilence of being modern reveals itself and robs the itlentity of the stability of centre and closure. (p. 52) Why ib complexity pt-ofundity rerrads hr

of language

of thought?

3 sentence

for

the

because

taken

As Vdugelas of

it

one has to try to unclerstand

author

be :I scjurce

academics,

tiona.

The chapters theorcW:ll

when

for

the

chapters

the

to

Lvorker

neighl,o~lrhoods

article

c,n the clisadvantagc

and

of less interest others,

p:uticulz-

on the effects

in

chapter.

11); Vaiou,

cm Lvonien of movcnients the lX1 Treaty

b:lsecl. It is somewhat

in ;I collection

the

women

lvicler issues more

and the ~vay in which

so market

to the

as with

facing

incot-porate

That

half

OI- lessel of guest-

I-eatle~-. ttowcvcr.

of lahour

;I grater

arc’ quite

(Kcstcloot).

foc[lses

the globe.

in Rrussels,

specific

distinctly.

of

on the location

general

Europe.

that have

c‘dse stuclies. Some of these,

as the chapter-

southern

the

issues

by approximately

focusing

on particul;ir

sit’c-

wide-ranging

regions

are complcmcntcd

by

four

concerning

appliabilit)

other

into

some

discussions of the H _, raising

These

7-X).

I/I chapters

divided

includc

not ;IS it

its counter-

(pp.

of

de\x4opmrnt

degree

K. D. Grill0

LIP

inclusion. should

passivity,

are utilized

ih macle

and

such

meant’.

of power

optiona

hook

with

is

fashion,

ofexclusion and

IX associated

not

what

spatial

necessarily

establishecl

to

‘marginality’

and

point out that marginality

The

put it: ‘If one

a social

and in the dual sense

hegemonic

to signifj

admiring

in both

The editors can

two or three times. it ought

purpose

LJnion (ELI). The term

of articles

surprising

c,n m:rrgin;llity

is

that

there

is

only one dc‘\ otc’d to the issue of gender. There The stated hensive

of thih book. by the editors.

in which

the ne\v Europe

‘the ways bith

objective

introduction

the reproduction

and.

tion of differentiation authors

\vish

Their

valid

social

concern

European

relating

ancl benefits.

One

threads gration

the spread 3 n3rro\v shape

many

motlern

societies.

the issue of change ment

perspective

and aras

philosophical is criticism in which

through

social This

hook

inte-

that are marginalized

only from. but by. the integmtion

of

nature

of

that

people of the

the

Soviet

celebratory disorder

and

‘otherness’.

complex

of

such

Such

ver)l

the

reinforced The

are be

pul)lic

sovereignty

zrticle

is by Robins

the prol~lem

neighhours. and

the

issue5

of multiple

to the ties between

expressions.

and

political

Italy being

to the

evolution

bloc.

of

to the Eli. but may

who disctIss

and its tz’rtcrn

inteiden-

disintegration. southern

due

Another

hww2n

of social

the point.

in rel:itlon

of NJ

Economic

;I bource to

and

there

the

problematic. identities

or exclutlednot process

be lead

confined

ol>vioiIs

the

of Mar-

‘procea

contradictions

of northern

and Aksoy.

develop-

on those

can

by no means more

the

Iocalization.

can

that

example

that

CIKI~~S prcNcm5

formation.

creates

addresses

an uneven

that focuses

which

obscurforces

and

examples,

in the post-Fordiat

the inherent

gration. tity

argues

usecl to clemonstratt’ of

;Is benign

of course

highlights

some

cm ‘Uew Aspects

occurring

glolxh.cUion

tension

of costs

developments.

elemental

of

acceptance

capitalism

vie\v of future of the

accounts

are described

The unquestioning of liberal

senses.

fundamental

together

ancl policies

and competition

or beneficial.

many

of the strong

account:,

of les

to the distribution

that ties the book

neoliherdl

in Europe’

pduperisation’

(p. ‘11. The

ignore

‘1’0 give

ginality

geographic

is that

integration

‘social’ issues

ing

and

are.

is associated

situation

be

many

lay Mingione

intensificd-

issues that could

book. chapter

indeed. the

compre-

many

in :Latutly of this kincl. antl to he fair to the

is to explore

and inequality‘

to highlight

c3clrr.s. m both

in a

are naturally

raised

the EL:

With the collapse thr

rapid

of

passing

of

ii .zenbc of inataldity feelmgs creation

of inclusion

of identity

dffrlir 1)ut ~~9~~s strongly

is :I

hrrsecl c)n the

Book

desire As

for protection

the

authors

replaced

against argue,

in Western

the outside

‘The

Evil

Demonology

this chapter

development something process

is the way in which

to other essential

regions

Other

articles

in the book

include

(by I’ugliese).

and the way in which

is constructed

tlows. against.

morr

clandestine:

marginalized :mcI

the

~vay

This

cc~ncluding ;I

look5

Ishr~,

S. Ahmed

in NE

ledge.

of a

values.

of

continuum‘

definirion

chapter

and of

c~~ncept

of

thr

I\\.0

d~velop1i~ent

and

as the1-e is much

geography

the remporal.

related

that could The I~secl

Similarly.

I0 en\.iromnental Ilave been

PI’ as an

given

emerging

Upton a notion

is

:I

fascinating

federal

entity,

focusing

members to the

creation,

\\.ithin 3s \vc‘II ~1s\vi[hout,

that a neu

it exist!

of the El’ who

Hy are

of integration.

borders

this hook

IIS

that

exist

is a G1luahlc

Globdi.s~~2.

London.

lY+t.

them. thv titles of these two hooks

some

ktzy

\?orcls

in

discourse ‘;I

the about

ideology

on rhe \vorld stage. SLUTY~

masterly

gii,e

vocabulaq.

by

of and

In \bh;11

an

expert’

( Or-irutdism

back co\.er). Turnrr ;1ssessr~ d&ate m wciolog); ahout the new patrerns :ind trends emerging in the wake of modernism. A central focus in the first half of his book IS I,slam \\ hich. Ile says. h:ts Ixxomr 2 major concern of sociologists

\vithin

tllr development

of a thror)

For hi5 part. Turner thinks

of postmocle1-niam.

rh:lt Ahmetl‘~ ( 19’9.Z) earlier

x1

\vork.

I’ostrnotkwrr-

and \Yiclrranging discusion of the place of Isl;ml \vithin the d&ate o\w ~)c)stmotl~rnisirl‘ (Oricr~talisr~z ., p. IO). ‘l‘his Ix~c~kgrountl, together \vitll hi4 dlel- writing5 and his 19)c)j 131X;relevi5ion series (‘Living Islam’) bringing h1.s concerns /Sill

lilld

k/Q/,1.

~11X)11~Isl;lm \vitler

of its societies,

doe5

by the processes attention

play.

Here is. possibly.

hut for whom

c,n those

disadvantaged by calling

subject.

is alho

integration

is often at odd5 Lvith the concern5

in

:I them?

political

of market

Bct\veen

realignment

mai-gindlity

Kout-

00.36;

22X pp.. ISHN 0 415 10862 -I (phk).

calla

2nd

alrd

Routledge,

political

Ihe spat ial

more

Po~tt~2o~it~r~rism

S. Turner.

Ahmed

to he gained

deterniinant5.

Oririrtdi.srn.

editors

direction,

by incorporating

(eels).

8 ( pl>k).

relating

I\y highlighting the v,xy in kvllich frontiers cm exibl Imth insitlc :intl ourside, tliey show 1h3t l+qxm integration and mai-ginali~ation :w t\vo bides of the s:~nie coin. They c;ilI for greater attention 10 Ix paid to the social tlimension~ of cultural, gcnclrr. cthnicity, ancl bo on. W/llile ackno\vIeclging that ;IIIVone book cannor cc,\w 311 the dimension,~ ot such 2 large 5tibject. this book \voultl have heen richer had more allention hcen paid to the temporal nature of the political

Donnan

1904. 242 pp., ISRN 0 4 Ii

contemporary

ho on.

phenomenon.

Hastings

London.

I3rpn

by clisc~ission

of question5

Akl,ar

al~d Pr/.stnaocl~r?lill:

and

The

at the function

of the

(hhulizutio~l

about

in its relation 10 core’-

number

to p
Llnion.

and

it is part

a4 3 ‘challenge

de\-elopment

to raise

who

of

studies (I3ailly and W~iss-Alt:1ner)

In the attenlpt

\vrires

collecti\ixt

especially

periphciy

to all those

the ‘social’ side of the post-

discrim-

policies

ib compltmented

marginaliry.

‘threat’

increasingly

Sadler

01. theoretical

the theoretical

of the

conventional

‘fortress‘

more

are

in which

pr~~ceas against

problems

study.

they

society.

c,hapte1- I>y I’ickvanccb and

thr

h~ome~

status

movements

more

patterns ;I

further

of re-indiistrializ~1tion

tingland,

urban

are

thus

from

the failure political

their

migration

against

As migrants

nated

Maastricht

about

direc-

interpretation

the

It will be of interest

are concerned a

inclusive

balance

approaches.

future

by its authors

a discussion

in international

such

world. such

a more to

about

part of a desire

world.

of new trends mentality

to create

it ties EU

of the

to the debate

tions. It represents world:

things

to understanding

in the modern

is

by the Balkan

tribes’ (p. 99). One of the most important about

contribution

world.

Empire

527

reuiewv

\\:I5

at the

audicncc.

key name

and

national author Pakistan

in the

rrlation5. joins

of

M

the

several

(L)onnan.

11 other

contributors 10

20th

celltul~

Ahmed

also

intcrest

in Islanl

pmctical

\vorld

In

I.sl6r171

ith 1)onnan.

p<“lses

t’s\ence

of

estal,h&tl

in rhc new

academc Ahmed.

tmtl

‘important

., Iiov,x~vel-.

anthropological to examine \50rld.

and

studies

1088. for example).

of the postniod~rn

in I,oth of inter-

his co-editor

glol,aliz;1tion--rhat

IO :I

;I:, ;I

of

and with

Muslim

rcs-

itlentifving