Accepted Manuscript Evaluation of Energy Efficacy and Texture of Ohmically Cooked Noodles
Yeon-Ji Jo, Sung Hee Park PII:
S0260-8774(19)30008-1
DOI:
10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.01.002
Reference:
JFOE 9500
To appear in:
Journal of Food Engineering
Received Date:
27 February 2018
Accepted Date:
03 January 2019
Please cite this article as: Yeon-Ji Jo, Sung Hee Park, Evaluation of Energy Efficacy and Texture of Ohmically Cooked Noodles, Journal of Food Engineering (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng. 2019.01.002
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Evaluation of Energy Efficacy and Texture of Ohmically Cooked Noodles
2
Yeon-Ji Joa, Sung Hee Parkb*
3 4 5
a Department
of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, South Korea,
6 7 8 9
bDepartment
of Marine Food Science and Technology, Gangneung-Wonju National
University, Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do 25457, South Korea
10 11
Running title: Ohmic heating for cooking of instant noodles
12 13
*Corresponding
14
Department of Marine Food Science and Technology, Gangneung-Wonju National
15
University, 7 Jukheon-gil, Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do 25457, South Korea
16
Phone: +82-33-640-2347, Fax: +82-33-640-2850
17
E-mail:
[email protected]
author. Sung Hee Park
18
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
Abstract
20
The feasibility of ohmic heating for cooking instant noodles was evaluated using a
21
customized ohmic system. Temperature come-up time, heat transfer ratio (HTnls), system
22
performance coefficient (SPC), and textural qualities were evaluated as a function of
23
different electric fields (10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm) and temperature holding times (30,
24
60, 90, and 120 s). Temperature come-up time to 100°C was 3.9±0.1, 2.5±0.1, 2.1±0.2,
25
and 1.3±0.1 min at electric fields of 10, 12.5, 15 and 17.5 V/cm, respectively.
26
Temperature come-up time decreased significantly with an increase in electric field. The
27
highest HTnls of 0.89 was observed at 15 V/cm. An electric field of 15 V/cm with a 90 s
28
holding time yielded the greatest SPC of 0.63±0.05 and the most preferable textural
29
qualities for hardness. Our study shows the potential of ohmic heating to rapidly cook
30
instant noodles with good textural qualities and energy efficiency.
31
32 33
Key words: ohmic heating; noodles; heat transfer; system performance coefficient; energy; texture
34 35 36 37
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
38
1. Introduction
39
Instant noodles have gained increasing popularity globally because of various
40
advantages including convenience, longer shelf-life, and affordable price (Jang et al.,
41
2016). Traditionally, noodles are cooked in water boiled on a gas stove or electric kettle.
42
However, boiling cold water is time-and energy-consuming. Furthermore, boiling starchy
43
food is time-consuming, e.g., noodles and rice. A processing technique that to achieve
44
cooking in a short period is desirable (Xue et al., 2008). Alternative cooking methods for
45
noodles could save cooking time and energy and improve the quality of the cooked
46
noodles. Lifestyle changes have also increased the demand for a cooking technique that
47
minimizes cooking time (Xue et al., 2008). The advanced utensils of cooking methods
48
significantly affect the quality attributes and physicochemical composition of cooked
49
foods (Jittanit et al., 2017). In response to consumer demand, commercial food
50
processing units are investigating numerous advanced thermal processing including
51
ohmic heating and microwave heating (Park et al., 2014). A more homogenous heating
52
can be achieved, since ohmic heating is volumetric heating wherein the entire volume of
53
food is heated simultaneously (Tornberg, 2013; Turp et al., 2016).
54
Ohmic heating is a potential energy-based, time-saving technique to cook noodles.
55
In ohmic heating, an alternating electric current is passed through materials to primarily
56
heat the materials via conversion of electrical energy to thermal energy, which generally
57
results in a rapid and uniform temperature increase in food (Cappato et al., 2017;
58
Leizerson and Shimoni, 2005; Mercali et al., 2014; Wongsa-Ngasri and Sastry, 2015).
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
59
The amount of heat dissipated is directly associated with the applied electric field
60
and the electrical conductivity of the product or of individual product fractions, as
61
determined on the basis of Ohm's law (Jaeger et al., 2016; Varghese et al., 2014). Food
62
products with lower electrical conductivities are heated slower than those with higher
63
electrical conductivity if the identical electric field strength is applied (Jittanit et al.,
64
2017).
65
Ohmic heating may offer numerous advantages including quicker cooking, less
66
power consumption, and a safer food product (Ito et al., 2014). Changes in the cooking
67
process influence the overall digestibility of noodles (Ye and Sui, 2016). In general, a
68
shorter noodle cooking time will improve the textural attributes of the noodles, with a
69
chewy and resilient bite without surface stickiness (Jang et al., 2016).
70
In this study, the applicability of ohmic heating to cook non-fried instant noodles
71
was evaluated. With an increase in health concerns among consumers worldwide, the
72
demand for low fat, non-fried instant noodles has increased rapidly (Wang et al., 2011).
73
These noodles are generally produced by molding the dough into a sheet and cutting it
74
into strips after mixing wheat flour with salt water (Inazu et al., 2002). Non-expanded
75
and non-fried noodles require prolonged cooking times. A technical challenge in
76
improving the quality attributes of noodles is to shorten the cooking time (Jang et al.,
77
2016). An electric field enhances water diffusion through the foodstuff during ohmic
78
heating (Jittanit et al., 2017; Kanjanapongkul, 2017; Kemp and Fryer, 2007). Considering
79
the significance of noodle cooking, energy efficiency, and textural quality, this study
80
aimed to the purposes of this study were (a) evaluate the effect of ohmic electric field
81
strength and holding time on noodle cooking time, (b) estimate the heat transfer ratio and 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
82
system performance coefficient (SPC) as a function of the electric field, and (c)
83
determine the textural quality of ohmically cooked noodles.
84
85
2. Material and methods
86
2.1. Instant noodle sample preparation
87
Japanese Udon-type instant noodles were purchased from a local market. The
88
Udon-type noodles were selected, since they have an appropriate diameter (2.5 mm) and
89
elastic structure for thermocouple insertion. One bag of instant noodles contains noodle
90
strands (225 g), soup powder (10 g), and dried vegetable-meat flakes (5 g). For one batch
91
ohmic heating experiment, one-quarter of a bag of the instant noodle mixture (noodle: 56
92
g, soup powder: 2.5 g, dried vegetable-meat flakes: 1.25 g) was added to 87.5 ml of
93
distilled water.
94 95
2.2. Ohmic heating system
96
Figure 1 illustrates the laboratory-scale self-customized ohmic heating system for
97
cooking instant noodles. A rectangular waterproof plastic food container (76×46×97 mm;
98
Lock & Lock, Seoul, Korea) was used as the ohmic container. Two square-type titanium
99
electrodes (75×45 mm2, thickness: 1 mm) were placed at both ends of the ohmic
100
container and were separated by 9.5 cm. Titanium electrodes were selected to minimize
101
the electrode chemical reaction (Samaranayake and Sastry, 2005). An AC power supply
102
(HCS-2SD50; Hanchang Trans, Busan, Korea) provided the electric field (V/cm) applied 5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
103
across the sample for ohmic heating. To estimate the heating and energy efficacy,
104
temperature, voltage, and current were measured and recorded every 3 s, using a Data
105
Acquisition System (DAQ, 34970A; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
106 107
2.3. Ohmic heating treatment
108
The prepared instant noodle mixture and distilled water described above were
109
placed in the ohmic container. Two 0.25 mm-diameter K-type thermocouples (TFIR-003-
110
50; Omega Engineering, Stamford, CT, USA) were used to measure the temperature of
111
the noodles (Tnl) and the soup (Ts). One thermocouple was inserted into the horizontal
112
center of the instant noodle strand and the other was positioned in the noodle soup. The
113
temperature of instant noodle mixture was equilibrated to 20℃ before ohmic heating. The
114
AC power supply provided four different electric fields of 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm
115
across the ohmic container until the soup was ohmically heated up to the target
116
temperature of 100°C. This temperature was maintained for the holding time of 30, 60,
117
90, and 120 s during which ohmic cooking of the noodles occurred. A target soup
118
temperature of 100℃ was maintained during the holding time through the on/off function
119
of the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller (ITC-100; Inkbird, Shenzhen,
120
China). A K-type thermocouple of the PID controller was used to measure the soup
121
temperature. The power supply was turned off once the soup temperature approached
122
100℃. It was intermittently turned on when soup temperature decreased to below 99℃.
123
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
124
2.4. Traditional method of noodle cooking using an electric kettle
125
We cooked noodles via the traditional manner using an electric kettle for reference.
126
Water (87.5 ml) was boiled in the electric kettle (KEK-MS120, Zhongsha Meisu
127
Electrical Co., China) and then the instant noodle mixture (noodle: 56 g, soup powder:
128
2.5 g, dried vegetable-meat flakes: 1.25 g) was cooked for 2 min in the boiling water, per
129
the manufacturer’s instructions.
130 131
2.5. Heating transfer ratio (HTnls) and empirical modeling fitting
132
The HTnls was estimated the heat transfer between the noodles and the soup as a
133
function of the electric field (10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm) and holding time (30, 60, 90,
134
and 120 s). To calculate the HTnls, thermal doses of the noodles (TDnl) and soup (TDs)
135
were defined as the amount of heat applied to the noodles and soup from the initial (ti) to
136
the final holding time (tf) (Fig. 2b, A↔C), respectively (Park et al., 2014). TDnl and TDs
137
were calculated through integration of an arbitrary noodle temperature (Tnl) and soup
138
temperature (Ts) during the come-up time, as shown in Fig. 2b. Eq. 1, and Eq. 2
139
represented the mathematical function to calculate the TDnl and TDs.
140
141
tf
TDnl Tnl dt ti
(Tnl ,0 Tnl ,1 ) t 2
(Tnl ,1 Tnl ,2 ) t 2
142
7
(Tnl ,n 1 Tnl ,n ) t 2
(Eq. 1)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
tf
(Ts ,0 Ts ,1 ) t
(Ts ,1 Ts ,2 ) t
(Ts ,n 1 Ts ,n ) t
143
TDs Ts dt
144
The aforementioned function was calculated using the trapezoidal numerical
ti
2
2
2
(Eq. 2)
145
integration of MATLAB software (Version 7.9.0.529; Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA)
146
as suggested by Park et al. (2014). In our study, the Ts increased earlier than that of Tnl;
147
thus, the heat transfer ratio (HTnls) was calculated as shown in Eq. 3:
148
149
HTnls
TDnl TDs
(Eq. 3)
150 151
The calculated HTnls was empirically fit to a second-order multivariate polynomial
152
regression as a function of the electric field (∇V, V/cm) and holding time (t, s) as shown
153
in Eq. 4 using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (version 9.1.3, SAS Institute
154
Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Equation 4 presents the estimated coefficients (β0, β1, β2, β3, β4, β5)
155
of the estimated empirical model.
156
157
HTnls 0 1 V 2 t 3 V 2 4 t 2 5 V t
158 159
2.6. Determination of system performance coefficient (SPC)
8
(Eq. 4)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
160
The SPC was calculated as the conversion ratio of total volumetric ohmic internal
161
energy dose ( Evd , J) to the amount of energy in the form of heat (J) to increase the
162
sample temperature to target temperature (Qtaken, J). SPC is commonly used to evaluate
163
the energy efficacy of ohmic heating (Darvishi et al., 2012; Darvishi et al., 2013; Icier
164
and Ilicali, 2004; Icier and Ilicali, 2005; Park et al., 2017). SPC was calculated during an
165
increase in soup temperature to 100°C (temperature come-up time; Figure 2b, A↔B),
166
since this is the period of the greatest electrical energy consumption during ohmic heating.
167
The amount of energy in the form of heat required to increase the sample
168
temperature to target temperature ( Qtaken , J) was calculated considering the increase in
169
the temperature of both soup and noodles, as described by Icier and Ilicali (2005), and as
170
shown in Eq. 5:
171
Qtaken =ms C p , s (Tis -T fs )+mnl C p ,nl (Tinl -T fnl )
(Eq. 5)
172
where Qtaken is the amount of energy in the form of heat (J), ms is the soup mass (kg),
173
mnl is the noodle mass (kg), C p ,s is the specific heat of the soup (J·kg-1·K-1), C p ,nl is the
174
specific heat of the noodles (J·kg-1·K-1), Tis is the initial temperature of the soup (°C), T fs
175
is the final target temperature (100°C) of the soup, Tinl is the initial temperature of the
176
noodles (°C), and T fnl is the final temperature of the noodles when soup temperature
177
approached 100°C.
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
178 179
Heat loss to the surroundings was considered as shown in Eq. 6 during temperature come-up time during ohmic cooking.
180
Qloss = htw Atw Tavtw hbw Abw Tavbw 2 hsw Asw Tavsw 2 hsew Asew Tavsew tcu 181
1/4 1/4 Tavtw Tavbw A T 0.59 A T 1.32 tw avtw bw avbw L L t = 1/4 1/4 cu T T avsw avsew 2 1.37 Asw Tavsw 2 1.37 Asew Tavsew L L
(Eq. 6)
182
183
where Qloss is the heat loss from each wall (top, bottom, side) of ohmic (76×46×97 mm;
184
Lock & Lock Seoul, Korea) container to surrounding by natural convection, htw is the
185
convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2·K) of top wall (horizontal plate where heat
186
plate is facing up) at the ohmic container, hbw is the convective heat transfer coefficient
187
(W/m2·K) of bottom wall (horizontal plate where heated plate is facing down) at the
188
ohmic container, hsw is the convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2·K) of side wall
189
(vertical plane) at the ohmic container, hsew is the convective heat transfer coefficient
190
(W/m2·K) of electrode side wall (vertical plane) at the ohmic container, Atw is the area of
191
top wall at the ohmic container, Abw is the area of bottom wall at the ohmic container,
192
Asw is the area of side wall at the ohmic container, Asew is the area of electrode side wall
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
193
at the ohmic container, Tavtw is the average temperature driving force of top wall
194
estimated from initial wall temperature, final wall temperature and ambient air
195
temperature, Tavbw is the average temperature driving force of the bottom wall estimated
196
from initial wall temperature, final wall temperature, and ambient air temperature, Tavsw
197
is the average temperature driving force of side wall estimated from initial wall
198
temperature, final wall temperature, and ambient air temperature, Tavsew is the average
199
temperature driving force of electrode side wall estimated from initial wall temperature,
200
final wall temperature, and ambient air temperature (Icier and Ilicali, 2005).
201
Heat transfer coefficients of the top wall, bottom wall, side wall, and side wall
202
with the electrode were calculated from the simplified equations for natural convection
203
with an appropriate Gr×Pr number range (Geankoplis, 1993; Icier and Ilicali, 2005). K-
204
type thermocouple was installed on each top wall, bottom wall, side wall, and side wall
205
with electrodes of the ohmic container to measure the initial and final wall temperature
206
during ohmic come-up time. These data were utilized to estimate the average temperature
207
driving force ( T ), which is the average of initial wall temperature, final wall
208
temperature, and ambient air temperature (Darvishi et al., 2012 ; Icier and Ilicali, 2005).
209
Convective heat transfer coefficients of top wall, side wall, electrode side wall and
210
bottom wall were 10.05, 10.38, 10.34 and 9.46 W/m2·K.
211
In our study, C p ,s was substituted by 4184 J·kg-1·K-1, which is considered to have a
212
value similar to that of water. C p ,nl was substituted by 3100 J·kg-1·K-1, which is the same 11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
213
as the reported value of waxy starch at 60% moisture content since Udon assessed in this
214
study was prepared from waxy starch at 60% moisture content (Tan et al., 2004). In our
215
study, the specific heat of C p ,s and C p ,nl were assumed to be independent of
216
temperature, as suggested by Icier and Ilicali (2005).
217
, W·m-3) was calculated as Ohmic internal energy generation rate per volume ( Q ie
218
a function of squared electric field (V/m) and electrical conductivity (S/m) as shown in
219
Eq. 7 (Li and Zhang, 2010):
220
Q ie = V
2
(Eq. 7)
221
Electrical conductivity (σ, S/m) of the material was determined from the cell
222
constant (k, m-1), voltage (V), and current (A) data. The cell constant (k, m-1) considered
223
the sample dimension where sample length (L, m) was divided by cross-sectional area (A,
224
m2). In our study, the sample length (L, m) was 0.0950 m, which is the distance between
225
the electrodes. The cross-sectional area (A, m2) was equal to the area of the rectangular
226
titanium electrodes (0.075×0.045 m) and was calculated as 0.0034 m2. Electrical
227
conductivity (σ, S/m) was determined as shown in Eq. 8:
228
229 230
231
=k
I V
(Eq. 8)
, W/m3) is expressed with a Thus, ohmic internal energy generation rate ( Q ie combination of Eq. 7 and 8 as shown in Eq. 9: I Q ie =k V V
2
12
(Eq. 9)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
232
Total volumetric ohmic internal energy dose (Evd, J) of the noodles and soup was
233
, W/m3), sample estimated by considering the ohmic internal energy generation rate ( Q ie
234
volume (v, m3), and their integration versus time (s) as shown in Eq. 10: tf Evd Q ie dt ti
235
tf
k ti
I 2 V dt V
I 0 I1 I1 I2 2 2 2 2 V0 V1 t0~1 V1 V2 t1~2 V1 V2 k V0 V1 v (Eq. 10) 2 I 2 V2 2 I 3 V3 2 t2~3 I n 1 Vn 1 2 I n Vn 2 tn 1~ n V2 V3 Vn Vn 1 236 237 238
The aforementioned function was calculated using the aforementioned trapezoidal numerical integration of MATLAB software, as suggested by Park et al. (2014).
239
Finally, the SPC was calculated as shown in Eq. 11 in consideration of Qtaken, Evd
240
and Qloss. SPC has been used to estimate the efficacy of ohmic heating for the
241
temperature increase of foods (Darvishi et al., 2012; Darvishi et al., 2013; Icier and Ilicali,
242
2004; Icier and Ilicali, 2005; Park et al., 2017).
243
SPC
Qtaken Evd Qloss
(Eq. 11)
244 245
Once the ohmic internal energy is totally converted to the temperature increase (heat), the
246
value of SPC is 1, with the value decreasing with low energy conversion status.
247 13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
248
2.7. Texture profile analysis (TPA)
249
TPA of ohmically cooked noodle strands was conducted using a TX-XT Plus
250
Texture Analyzer (Texture Technology Corp., Brewster, NY, USA) with certain
251
modifications of a previous method (Wang et al., 2011). Ohmically cooked noodle
252
strands were removed from the ohmic container immediately after treatment and were
253
then placed on a stainless-steel mesh to eliminate soup from the noodle strands. The
254
noodle sample was placed on a stainless-steel plate for the TPA. Each noodle strand was
255
cut using a model TA-47 W pasta blade (Texture Technology Corp.). TPA settings were
256
as follows: pretest speed at 5 mm/s, test speed at 3.30 mm/s, post-test speed at 1.00 mm/s,
257
target distance at 2 mm, time at 2.0 s, and trigger type of auto. Cooked noodle strands
258
displayed an average thickness of 2.9 mm; hence, the target distance (cutting depth) was
259
set as 2 mm, which represented 70% of the noodle thickness. TPA measurements
260
included hardness (N), cohesiveness, springiness, and gumminess (N): hardness (force
261
necessary to attain a given deformation, maximum force), cohesiveness (adheres to itself
262
under some compressive or tensile stress, Area 2/Area 1), springiness (degree to which a
263
product returns to its original shape once it has been compressed, Length 2/Length 1),
264
and gumminess (simulated energy required to disintegrate a semisolid food to a steady
265
state, hardness×cohesiveness) (Klinmalai et al., 2017; Turp et al., 2016).
266
267
2.8. Statistical analyses
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
268
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (version
269
9.1.3, SAS Institute Inc.). Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance
270
(ANOVA) for multiple comparisons. Fisher’s least-significant difference (LSD)
271
procedures were used for multiple comparisons among treatments at the 95% confidence
272
interval (P<0.05). All the ohmic treatments were replicated five times.
273
274
3. Results and discussion
275
3.1. Temperature histories of soup and noodles at different electric fields
276
Figure 2a shows the temperature histories of the ohmically heated soup at different
277
electric fields (10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm). As expected, an increase in electric field
278
intensity induced a faster temperature come-up as a function of the elevated voltage
279
gradient (V/cm). Electric fields at 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm yielded temperature come-
280
up time to 100°C of 3.9±0.3, 2.5±0.1, 2.1±0.2, and 1.3±0.1 min, respectively. In ohmic
281
heating, the rate of increase of the temperature was associated with enhanced voltage
282
(Lee et al., 2012; Yoon et al., 2002). Since the electrical energy per treatment time, which
283
is converted to heat energy, depends on the voltage gradient and the current passing
284
through the sample, the temperature increase at any instant is higher at higher voltage
285
gradients (Darvishi et al., 2012).
286
Figure 2b shows the results of the comparison of the representative temperature
287
histories between soup and noodles at 15 V/cm and the 90 s holding time. Soup
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
288
temperature increased before that of the noodles at all tested ohmic heating treatments.
289
For example, when the soup temperature approached 100°C (Tfs) within 114 s (A↔B)
290
during electric field application at 15 V/cm, the noodle temperature approached 51.9°C
291
(Tfnl), thereby representing a temperature difference (ΔT) of 48.1°C. The rate of ohmic
292
heating is proportional to the electrical conductivity increase (Sastry and Palaniappan,
293
1992). In our study, a more rapid increase in soup temperature reflected a higher
294
electrical conductivity of the soup than that of noodles, since soup contains various ions
295
including sodium chloride as well as seasonings. The movements of ions and subsequent
296
amplification of electrical conductivity will expedite the temperature increase during
297
ohmic heating (Jittanit et al., 2017; Shirsat et al., 2004).
298
In our study, the traditional method of cooking noodles with an electric kettle was
299
compared to ohmic heating as described in the section 2.4. Boiling of water in the electric
300
kettle lasted 3.6±0.3 min; thereafter, the noodles were cooked for 2 min per the
301
manufacturer’s instructions. The total cooking time was 5.6±0.3 min. Although SPC and
302
textural qualities are discussed in a later section, ohmic heating at 15 V/cm and 90 s
303
holding time yielded the best SPC and textural qualities. In case of ohmic heating at 15
304
V/cm and 90 s, the temperature come-up time was 2.1 min; holding time, 1.5 min.
305
Subsequently, ohmic heating at 15 V/cm and 90 s holding time resulted in a total cooking
306
time of 3.6 min, which is more rapid than the (5.3 min) traditional method of cooking.
307
Our study showed the potential of ohmic heating, which could save time in cooking
308
noodles.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
309
3.2. Heat transfer ratio (HTnls) between noodle and soup
310
Figure 3 shows the HTnls as a function of elevated electric fields (10, 12.5, 15, and
311
17.5 V/cm) and prolonged holding time (30, 60, 90, and 120 s). The lowest HTnls of
312
0.29±0.03 was obtained at 10 V/cm and 30 s holding time. The highest HTnls of
313
0.89±0.01 was obtained at 15 V/cm and a holding time of 60 s, and at 15 V/cm and a
314
holding time of 120 s. HTnls was significantly increased as a function of prolonged
315
holding time at a low electric field intensity of 10 V/cm (P<0.05). Temperature come-up
316
time was relatively longer (3.9±0.3 min) at the low electric field intensity of 10 V/cm;
317
thus, the noodles cooked slowly during the prolonged holding time. In contrast, no
318
significant difference of HTnls was observed among the tested holding times at 15 V/cm
319
(P>0.05), except for the 30 s holding time. Among the electric fields assessed, 15 V/cm
320
yielded a good HTnls. For example, although the holding time was as short as 30 s at 15
321
V/cm, the HTnls was high (0.83±0.02). A high HTnls indicates enhanced heat transfer
322
between the soup and noodles. Noodles cooked rapidly at high HTnls displayed improved
323
textural qualities. The association between HTnls and textural qualities is discussed in
324
section 3.4.
325
Table 2 presents the empirical polynomial regression parameters (β0-5) predicting
326
HTnls as a function of the electric field (∇V, V/cm) and holding time (t, min) calculated
327
in Eq. 5. The polynomial model indicated a significantly positive linear coefficient, with
328
a β1 value 0.462792 for electric field strength (∇V; P<0.05), implying enhanced heat
329
transfer between the noodles and the soup with an increase in electric field intensity.
330
During ohmic heating, a high electric field intensity would induce rapid heating and 17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
331
subsequent expedited heat transfer between the noodles and the soup. We obtained a
332
significant positive linear coefficient of β2 of 0.009153 for holding time (t; P<0.05).
333
However, the numerical magnitude of β2 was markedly smaller than that of β1, indicating
334
that the electric field strength is more influential than holding time. In the quadratic
335
function of the electric field (∇V2) and holding time (t2), both β3 and β4 displayed
336
negative coefficients (-0.000426 and -0.014338, respectively) with significance (P<0.05).
337
Both quadratic parameters of β3 and β4 were very small numbers, indicating that a non-
338
linear function is a weak function for electric field strength and holding time. The linear
339
combination (β5) of the electric field (∇V) and holding time (t) did not yield significant
340
results in the probability test (P>0.05). In the empirical model fitting, it is assumed that
341
electric field strength (∇V, V/cm) is the most influential function to increase heat
342
transfer from soup to noodles associated with rapid heating in an elevated electric field.
343
3.3. Amount of energy in the form of heat (Qtaken, J), total volumetric ohmic internal
344
energy dose (Evd, J), heat loss (J), and SPC
345
Figure 4 shows a representative temperature history at 15 V/cm and a holding time
346
of 120 s of soup (Ts) and noodles (Tnl) versus the ohmic internal energy generation rate
347
, W·m-3). The data were utilized to calculate the volumetric ohmic per volume ( Q ie
348
internal energy dose (Evd, J), amount of energy in the form of heat ( Qtaken , J), and system
349
performance coefficient (SPC) at 15 V/cm and 120 s holding time. The temperature of
350
the soup (Ts) increased from the initial temperature (Tis) of 25°C to final target
351
temperature (Tfs) of 100°C within 105 s (A↔B). During this period, the Tnl increased 18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
352
from the initial temperature (Tinl) to the final target temperature (Tfnl) of 68°C. The
353
increases in the soup (ΔTs) and noodles (ΔTnl) temperatures were 75 and 43°C,
354
respectively. As described in Eq. 5, the amount of energy in the form of heat (Qtaken, J)
355
was calculated using temperature increases (ΔTs, ΔTnl) of the soup and noodles and the
356
soup mass (ms, kg), noodle mass (mnl, kg), specific heat of soup ( C p ,s ,J·kg-1·K-1), and
357
specific heat of noodles ( C p ,nl ,J·kg-1·K-1). Calculated Qtaken values were tabulated as a
358
function of the elevated electric fields (Table 1). An electric field of 10 V/cm resulted in
359
Qtaken of 29605±197 J. Elevation of the electric field to 12.5 V/cm produced a Qtaken of
360
31970±947 J. The highest Qtaken was 36607±1592 J at the 15 V/cm electric field. The 17.5
361
V/cm electric field yielded a lower Qtaken (34326±1496 J) in comparison to that of 15
362
V/cm. The highest Qtaken at 15 V/cm is attributed to the combined effect of enhanced heat
363
transfer from soup to noodles and minimized heat loss. Qtaken values are governed by final
364
soup (liquid) temperature and noodle temperature. Although final soup temperature was
365
identical to 100℃ during the temperature come-up time, noodle temperature differed at
366
different electric field intensities. Noodle temperature approached 43.3±1.2, 57.2±5.6,
367
84.4±9.3, and 62.1±8.8℃ at 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm during temperature come-up
368
time of soup to 100℃ , respectively. 15 V/cm induced the most efficient increase in
369
noodle temperature; hence, it resulted in the highest Qtaken value. Therefore, 15 V/cm
370
resulted in the highest Qtaken (36607±1592 J) in combination with an appropriate
371
temperature come-up time and heat transfer from soup to noodles. In the scope of our
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
372
study, 15 V/cm was the optimum electric field strength to effectively secure the energy in
373
the form of heat during ohmic heating. Its efficacy will be discussed subsequently in
374
relation to SPC.
375
, W/m3) continuously Ohmic internal energy generation rate per volume ( Q ie
376
was calculated increased during the temperature come–up time of ohmic heating. Q ie
377
with a combination of electrical conductivity (σ, S/m) and electric field (V/m) across the
378
was responsible for increased electrical conductivity in sample. Increasing Q ie
379
accordance with an increase in temperature. Palaniappan and Sastry (1991) reported that
380
the electrical conductivities of tomato and orange juice increased linearly with
381
temperature. Increasing electrical conductivity of liquids at elevated temperature can be
382
explained by the reduced drag for the movement of ions (Palaniappan and Sastry, 1991).
383
Many studies have reported an increase in the electrical conductivity of liquids and solid
384
foods with an increased temperature during ohmic heating (Darvishi et al., 2012; Darvishi
385
et al., 2013; Icier and Ilicali, 2004; Icier & Ilicali, 2005; Kanjanapongkul, 2017; Sarang et
386
al., 2008).
387
The total volumetric ohmic internal energy dose (Evd, J) from noodles and soup
388
, W·m-3), was calculated by considering the ohmic internal energy generation rate ( Q ie
389
sample volume (v, m-3), and their integration versus time (s), as shown in Eq. 10 and
390
tabulated in Table 1. Evd ranged from 49793±2135 J to 51460±3659 J; however, there
391
was no significant difference (P>0.05) among the electric fields (10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5
392
V/cm). At a low electric field intensity of 10 V/cm, the internal energy generation rate
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
393
, W·m-3) slowly increased with a lower slope for a long time. At a high per volume ( Q ie
394
rapidly increased with a higher slope for a longer electric field intensity of 17.5 V/cm Q ie
395
time. Therefore, no difference was observed in total volumetric ohmic internal energy
396
was integrated versus time. dose (Evd, J) among treatments when Q ie
397
The traditional manner of cooking noodles, using an electric kettle consumed an
398
electrical energy of energy of 81000±5400 J during water boiling. Subsequently, it took
399
the electrical energy of 129600±3600 J for 2 min cooking at boiling water. Therefore, the
400
total electrical energy spent in traditional noodle cooking was 210600±4762 J. Ohmic
401
heating at 15 V/cm spent the electrical energy of 50859 J (Table 1). Internal heat
402
generation of ohmic cooking could save the electrical energy by approximate 76% as
403
compared to cooking in an electrical kettle. Ohmic heating provided 82–97% of energy
404
saving while reducing the heating times by 90–95% compared to conventional heating
405
(Darvishi et al., 2013; De Halleux et al., 2005).
406
Estimated heat losses from the top, bottom, side and the side with electrodes were
407
tabulated in table 1. As shown in Eq. 6, heat loss was estimated through a simplified
408
estimation convective heat transfer coefficient (h, W·m-2·K-1), area of each wall, and
409
average temperature driving force (ΔTav). Among electric fields assessed, a lower electric
410
field yielded a greater increase in temperature on the walls during temperature come-up
411
time. For example, 10 V/cm indicated a final temperature of 79.5±6.1, 74.2±6.1, and
412
64.8℃±5.5℃ at side wall, bottom wall and electrode side wall, respectively. Whereas,
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
413
17.5 V/cm indicated the final temperature of 61.7± 6.7, 60.5± 6.4, and 59.2℃±6.5℃ at
414
side wall, bottom wall and electrode side wall, respectively. A low electric field yielded a
415
longer temperature come-up time, suggesting that slow temperature come-up time at low
416
electric field allows for more heat loss to the surroundings. Estimated convective heat
417
transfer coefficients ranged from 4.45 W·m-2·K-1to 10.38 W·m-2·K-1. The bottom wall
418
showed the lowest hbw of 4.45±0.01 W·m-2·K-1, whereas the side wall with the electrode
419
showed the highest values of 10.38 W·m-2·K-1. Marra et al. (2009) reported the overall
420
heat transfer coefficient ranged from 5 W·m-2·K-1 to 50 W·m-2·K-1 during ohmic heating
421
of potato. It is evident that heat loss occurs to the cell wall and electrode during ohmic
422
heating of surfaces, which must be reduced by improving the system design such as
423
thermal insulation and heating tape application (Marra et al., 2009; Zell et al., 2011).
424
Overshooting of electric field strength near the electrode edges resulted in a greater
425
temperature increase with an enhanced ohmic heating effect (Jun and Sastry, 2005). Heat
426
loss indicated the 13937±53, 8924±21, 7474±37, and 4598±20 J at 10, 12.5, 15, and
427
17.5 V/cm, respectively. A low electric field intensity yielded a longer temperature come-
428
up time; thus, it would allow for greater heat loss to the surroundings. The energy loss
429
represents the heat required to heat the test cell, electrodes, etc., and heat loss to the
430
surroundings via natural convection and the portion of the generated heat used for
431
purposes other than heating the liquid, i.e., chemical reaction (Darvishi et al., 2012). As
432
the voltage gradient increased from 6 V/cm to 14 V/cm, specific energy losses decreased
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
433
from 1.49 to 0.62 MJ/kg during ohmic heating of tomato paste (Torkian Boldaji et al.,
434
2015). The present results suggest that rapid temperature come-up time is desirable to
435
minimize heat loss to the surroundings during ohmic heating.
436
SPC values during ohmic heating are markedly dependent on the electric field
437
strength applied to the sample (Icier and Ilicali, 2005; Park et al., 2017). The electric field
438
strength of 10 V/cm yielded an SPC of 0.46±0.02, which indicate that 46% of the
439
electrical energy was converted to thermal energy to heat the sample. SPC increased up
440
to 0.63±0.05 at the electric field strength of 15 V/cm and decreased to 0.58±0.02 at the
441
field strength of 17.5 V/cm. SPC strongly depends on the voltage gradient (electric field)
442
during ohmic heating (Darvishi et al., 2013). SPC values range from 0.47-0.92 during
443
ohmic heating (Icier and Ilicali, 2005). In this study, all the electrical energy was not
444
completely changed to heat since SPC was < 1. A portion of ohmic electrical energy is
445
used for physical, chemical, and electrochemical changes of food during ohmic heating
446
(Assiry et al., 2003; Darvishi et al., 2013; Icier and Ilicali, 2005) and heat loss (4598-
447
13937 J) to the surroundings estimated in our study. We postulate that a minor portion of
448
the ohmic internal energy generation was also used for the gelatinization of starch
449
granules in the noodles other than for an increase in temperature. When starch granules
450
are gelatinized in excess water, there is a phase change from an ordered to a disordered
451
configuration; simultaneously, other phenomena are observed, including the uptake of
452
heat by starch granules and loss of birefringence (Li et al., 2004). Gelatinization enthalpy
453
of starch ranges from 0.807 to 1.591 J/g during the heating process (Coral et al., 2009).
454
Per the scope of our experiment, the most efficient SPC was 0.63±0.06 at 15 V/cm
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
455
among the tested electric fields. According to energy conversation equation, electrical
456
energy input is converted to heat for temperature increase of material, electrochemical
457
reactions, heat loss to surrounding, accompanying circuits and device in the ohmic
458
heating (Min et al., 2007; Yin et al., 2018). Electrical conductivity of foods has the
459
significant effect on SPC. These multiple factors would influence on the SPC.
460
We suggest that 15 V/cm is the optimum electric field to cook noodles in an
461
energy-efficient manner. The appropriate electric field for SPC should be determined on
462
the basis of the ohmic heater design and properties of foods.
463
464
3.4. Texture profile analysis (TPA)
465
Figure 5 shows the results of TPA analyses of hardness (N) and gumminess (N) of
466
ohmically cooked noodles at electric fields strengths of 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 V/cm and
467
holding times of 30, 60, 90, and 120 s. TPA is one of the most widely accepted
468
instrumental methods to estimate the sensory texture attributes of cooked noodles (Baik,
469
2010; Ross, 2006; Wang et al., 2011). Although several textural parameters (hardness,
470
cohesiveness, springiness, and gumminess) were analyzed, only hardness (N) and
471
gumminess (N) yielded a significant difference among treatments (P<0.05). Springiness
472
ranged from 4.96 to 5.25; however, there was no significant difference among tested
473
electric fields and holding times (P>0.05). No significant difference in springiness could
474
be attributed to the small diameter of noodles at 2.5 mm. For cohesiveness, it showed
475
very similar trends to those of hardness (data not shown). Gumminess is the combination
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
476
of hardness and cohesiveness (hardness ×cohesiveness), gumminess (N) could represent
477
the experimental data of cohesiveness when those have similar values.
478
The lowest hardness was 1.163±0.192 N at 10 V/cm and 30 s holding time among
479
the tested experimental conditions. The present results suggest that the noodles were
480
insufficiently cooked at 10 V/cm and 30 s and displayed a low N value. The desired
481
hardness of noodle varies with the noodle type and regional preference (Wang et al.,
482
2011). Hardness of ohmically cooked noodles was increased (1.353 N) during a
483
prolonged holding time of 120 s at the electrical field strength of 10 V/cm. With an
484
increase in cooking time, starch granules swell and voids appear, which alters the textural
485
properties (Ye and Sui, 2016). During cooking of noodles, a network displaying firmness
486
that in the order of that of the structural elements themselves is gradually established
487
through the processes of starch swelling and gelatinization and protein coagulation (Sui et
488
al., 2006). In contrast, when the holding time was increased from 90 s to 120 s at 17.5
489
V/cm, hardness decreased from 1.538±0.140 N to 1.279±0.125 N. An excessive holding
490
time would lead to overcooking of noodles and diminish their chewy texture.
491
Undercooking of noodles induces the insufficient absorption of water to produce a coarse
492
and hard texture, whereas overcooked noodles absorb excessive water, leading to a sticky
493
and soft texture (Jin et al., 1994; Ye and Sui, 2016). Optimally cooked noodles have a
494
chewy and resilient bite without surface stickiness (Miskelly and Moss, 1985; Sui et al.,
495
2006). In our study, the hardness of ohmically cooked noodles increased as a function of
496
elevated electric fields up to 15 V/cm and then decreased 17.5 V/cm. The high electric
497
field at 17.5 V/cm showed a rapid temperature come-up time up to 100°C of 1.3±0.1 min, 25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
498
which could hinder precise temperature control. The desired noodle hardness varies with
499
the noodle type and regional preference (Wang et al., 2011). Generally, undercooked
500
noodles are not preferred by consumers owing to their unpleasant raw doughy taste, while
501
overcooked noodles are difficult to handle with either chopsticks or a fork (Sui et al.,
502
2006). One of the technical challenges in improving the quality attributes of noodles is to
503
shorten their cooking time to yield a product with a chewy, resilient bite without surface
504
stickiness (Jang et al., 2016). In the present study, it was expected that the ideal textural
505
quality of noodle for consumer appeal could be similar to that of the traditional method of
506
cooking of noodles in accordance with the manufacturer’s cooking instructions. The
507
traditional method of cooking produces a hardness of 1.528±0.271 N. Ohmic heating at
508
15 V/cm and 90 s holding time resulted in a hardness of 1.534±0.189 N, which is highly
509
similar to that of the traditional method of cooking noodles.
510
Changes in gumminess (N) are presented in Figure 5b. The gumminess of a noodle
511
is the energy (amplified force) requirement to disintegrate or masticate the noodle (Guo
512
et al., 2003). Hardness has been positively correlated with gumminess and chewiness (Li
513
et al., 2017). Presently, gumminess ranged from 0.377 N to 0.427 N at a holding time of
514
30 s and no significant difference was observed among different electric fields at this
515
holding time. This would not be sufficient to cook noodles to produce the desirable
516
chewy and resilient texture. Gumminess displayed an increasing trend as a function of
517
prolonged holding time and an elevated electric field intensity. Noodles cooked in boiling
518
water in accordance with the manufacturer’s cooking instructions (traditional method)
519
yielded a gumminess value of 0.658±0.097 N. The conditions of 15 V/cm and a 90 s
520
holding time yielded the most similar gumminess value of 0.606±0.037 N. Per the scope 26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
521
of our experiment, considering both textural qualities and SPC for energy efficacy, an
522
electrical field strength of 15 V/cm and a 90 s holding time was considered the optimal
523
ohmic heating condition for cooking noodles.
524
525
4. Conclusions
526
The present study shows the potential of ohmic heating to cook instant noodles
527
with a variation of electric fields and temperature holding times. Ohmic heating at an
528
electric field strength of 15 V/cm displayed promising energy efficacy in terms of SPC
529
where 63% of electrical energy could be efficiently converted to thermal energy to cook
530
noodles and soup. Ohmic heating could save the time required to boil the water and
531
subsequently cook the noodles, since the temperature rapidly increased up to 100°C
532
within 1.3 min. In terms of textural qualities, the preferable hardness and gumminess
533
were obtained at an electrical field strength of 15 V/cm, which yielded a value similar to
534
that observed when cooking in accordance with the manufacturer’s cooking instructions.
535
Per the scope of our experiment, 15 V/cm was the optimum electric field strength for
536
energy efficacy, heat transfer, and textural qualities. Appropriate electric fields differ
537
with differences in food matrices, ingredients, cooking purpose and ohmic heater design.
538
Considering modern-day lifestyles, ohmic heating can be considered popular for the
539
warming or cooking of convenience foods, meal replacement food, and outdoor foods.
540
Further investigations for the use of ohmic heating technology for various convenience
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
541
foods, such as instant noodles, rapidly prepared rice, and retort pouch products are
542
warranted.
543
Acknowledgments
544
This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National
545
Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education of the
546
Republic of Korea (No.2018R1A6A1A03023584 and No. 2017R1C1B5017458).
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
570 V
547
571 548 Nomenclature
(m2)
cross sectional area
550 Cp
specific heat (J/kg·K)
551 E total volumetric ohmic internal 552 energy (E) 553 h
convective heat transfer
554
coefficients (W·m-2·K-1)
555 HT
heat transfer ratio
556 I
current (A)
557 k
cell constant (m-1)
558 L
length (m) or
559
electrode distance (m)
561
mass (kg)
Q The amount of energy in the form of
562 heat (J)
563
Q
564
V
electric field (V/m), electric
572 field (V/cm)
549 A
560 m
voltage (V)
Ohmic generation rate per volume (W·m-3)
573 v
volume (m3)
574 β
parameters in the empirical model
575 σ
electrical conductivity (S/m)
576 577 Subscript 578 av
average
579 bw
bottom wall
580 d
dose
581 f
final
582 fnl
final noodle
583 fs
final soup
584 i
initial
585 ie
internal energy
586 inl
initial noodle
587 is
initial soup
588 loss
loss to the surrounding
589 nl
noodle
565 SPC
system performance coefficient
590 nls
noodle and soup
566 T
temperature (°C)
591 s
soup
567 TD
thermal dose
592 sew
568 TPA
texture profile analysis
593 sw
569 t
time (s), time (min)
594 taken 29
side wall with electrode side wall heat taken
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
595
622 tret
treated sample
596
623 tw
top wall
597
624 v
volume
598
625 626 627 628
599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621
30
0,1,2,3,…,n subinterval in trapezoidal numerical integration or parameters (intercept & slope) in the empirical model fitting
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
629
References
630
Assiry, A.M., Gaily, M.H., Alsamee, M., & Sarifudin, A. (2010). Electrical conductivity of
631
seawater during ohmic heating. Desalination, 260(1), 9-17.
632
Baik, B.K. (2010). Effects of flour protein and starch on noodle quality. In G. G. Hou (Ed.),
633
Asian noodles: Science, technology, and processing (pp. 261-283). New Jersey:John Wiley &
634
Sons, Inc.
635
Cappato, L.P., Ferreira, M.V.S., Guimaraes, J.T., Portela, J.B., Costa, A.L.R., Freitas, M.Q.,
636
Cunha, R.L., Oliveira, C.A.F., Mercali, G.D., Marzack, L.D.F., & Cruz, A.G. (2017). Ohmic
637
heating in dairy processing: Relevant aspects for safety and quality. Trends in Food Science &
638
Technology, 62, 104-112.
639
Coral, D., Pineda-Gómez, P., Rosales-Rivera, A., & Rodriguez-Garcia, M. (2009).
640
Determination of the gelatinization temperature of starch presented in maize flours, Journal of
641
Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, p. 012057.
642
Darvishi, H., Hosainpour, A., & Nargesi, F. (2012). Ohmic heating behaviour and electrical
643
conductivity of tomato paste. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences, 2(167), 1-5.
644
Darvishi, H., Khostaghaza, M.H., & Najafi, G. (2013). Ohmic heating of pomegranate juice:
645
Electrical conductivity and pH change. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences,
646
12(2), 101-108.
647
De Halleux, D., Piette, G., Buteau, M.L., & Dostie, M. (2005). Ohmic cooking of processed
648
meats: energy evaluation and food safety considerations. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 47,
649
341–347.
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
650
Geankoplis, C.J. (1993). Transport processes and unit operations (pp.256). PTR Prentice Hall,
651
New Jersey.
652
Guo, G., Jackson, D.S., Graybosch, R.A., & Parkhurst, A.M. (2003). Asian salted noodle quality:
653
impact of amylose content adjustments using waxy wheat flour. Cereal Chemistry, 80(4), 437-
654
445.
655
Icier, F., & Ilicali, C. (2004). Electrical conductivity of apple and sourcherry juice concentrates
656
during ohmic heating. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 27(3), 159-180.
657
Icier, F., & Ilicali, C. (2005). The effects of concentration on electrical conductivity of orange
658
juice concentrates during ohmic heating. European Food Research and Technology, 220(3), 406-
659
414.
660
Inazu, T., Iwasaki, K., & Furuta, T. (2002). Effect of tempeature and realtive humidity on drying
661
kinetics of fresh Japanese noodle (Udon). Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und –Technologie, 35, 649-
662
655.
663
Ito, R., Fukuoka, M., & Hamada-Sato, N. (2014). Innovative food processing technology using
664
ohmic heating and aseptic packaging for meat. Meat science, 96(2, Part A), 675-681.
665
Jaeger, H., Roth, A., Toepfl, S., Holzhauser, T., Engel, K.-H., Knorr, D., Vogel, R.F., Bandick,
666
N., Kulling, S., Heinz, V., & Steinberg, P. (2016). Opinion on the use of ohmic heating for the
667
treatment of foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 55, 84-97.
668
Jang, A., Kim, J.Y., & Lee, S. (2016). Rheological, thermal conductivity, and microscopic
669
studies on porous-structured noodles for shortened cooking time. LWT - Food Science and
670
Technology, 74, 1-6. 32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
671
Jin, M., Wu, J., & Wu, X. (1994). A study on properties of starches used for starch noodle
672
making, In Proceedings 1994 international symposium and exhibition on new approaches in the
673
production of food stuffs and intermediate products from cereal grains and oil seeds (pp. 488-
674
496). Beijing, China.
675
Jittanit, W., Khuenpet, K., Kaewsri, P., Dumrongpongpaiboon, N., Hayamin, P., & Jantarangsri,
676
K. (2017). Ohmic heating for cooking rice: Electrical conductivity measurements, textural
677
quality determination and energy analysis. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies,
678
42, 16-24.
679
Jun, S., & Sastry, S. (2005). Modeling and optimization of ohmic heating of foods inside a
680
flexibiel package. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 28, 417-436.
681
Kanjanapongkul, K. (2017). Rice cooking using ohmic heating: Determination of electrical
682
conductivity, water diffusion and cooking energy. Journal of Food Engineering, 192, 1-10.
683
Kemp, M.R., & Fryer, P.J. (2007). Enhancement of diffusion through foods using alternating
684
electric fields. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 8(1), 143-153.
685
Klinmalai, P., Hagiwara, T., Sakiyama, T., & Ratanasumawong, S. (2017). Chitosan effects on
686
physical properties, texture, and microstructure of flat rice noodles. LWT-Food Science and
687
Technology, 76, 117-123.
688
Lee, S.Y., Sagong, H.G., Ryu, S., & Kang, D.H. (2012). Effect of continuous ohmic heating to
689
inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in
690
orange juice and tomato juice. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 112(4), 723-731.
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
691
Leizerson, S., & Shimoni, E. (2005). Stability and sensory shelf life of orange juice pasteurized
692
by continuous ohmic heating. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(10), 4012-4018.
693
Li, F.D., Li, L.T., Li, Z., & Tatsumi, E. (2004). Determination of starch gelatinization
694
temperature by ohmic heating. Journal of Food Engineering, 62(2), 113-120.
695
Li, F. D., & Zhang, L. (2010). Ohmic heating in food processing. In M. M. Farid (Ed.),
696
Mathematical modelling of food processing (pp. 659-689). New York: CRC Press.
697
Li, W. J., Deng, Z. Y., Chen, G. F., Chen, F., Li, X. F., & Tian, J. C. (2017). Genetic dissection
698
of the sensory and textural properties of Chinese white noodles using a specific RIL population.
699
Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(2), 454-463.
700
Marra, F., Zell, M., Lyng, J.G., Morgan, D.J., & Cronin, D.A. (2009). Analysis of heat transfer
701
during ohmic processing of a solid food. Journal of Food Engineering, 91, 56-63.
702
Mercali, G.D., Schwartz, S., Marczak, L.D.F., Tessaro, I.C., & Sastry, S. (2014). Ascorbic acid
703
degradation and color changes in acerola pulp during ohmic heating: Effect of electric field
704
frequency. Journal of Food Engineering, 123, 1-7.
705
Min, S., Sastry, S.K., & Balasubramaniam, V.M. (2007). In situ electrical conductivity
706
measurement of selected liquid foods under hydrostatic pressure to 800 MPa. Journal of Food
707
Engineering, 82, 489-497.
708
Miskelly, D., & Moss, H. (1985). Flour quality requirements for Chinese noodle manufacture.
709
Journal of Cereal Science, 3(4), 379-387.
34
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
710
Palaniappan, S., & Sastry, S.K. (1991). Electrical conductivity of selected juices: influence of
711
temperature, solid content, applied voltage, and particle size. Journal of Food Process
712
Engineering, 14(4), 247-260.
713
Park, I.K., Ha, J.W., & Kang, D.H. (2017). Investigation of optimum ohmic heating conditions
714
for inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and
715
Listeria monocytogenes in apple juice. BMC Microbiology, 17(1), 117.
716
Park, S.H., Balasubramaniam, V.M., & Sastry, S.K. (2014). Quality of shelf-stable low-acid
717
vegetables processed using pressure–ohmic–thermal sterilization. LWT - Food Science and
718
Technology, 57(1), 243-252.
719
Ross, A.S. (2006). Instrumental measurement of physical properties of cooked Asian wheat flour
720
noodles. Cereal chemistry, 83(1), 42-51.
721
Samaranayake, C.P., & Sastry, S.K. (2005). Electrode and pH effects on electrochemical
722
reactions during ohmic heating. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 577(1), 125-135.
723
Sarang, S., Sastry, S. K., & Knipe, L. (2008). Electrical conductivity of fruits and meats during
724
ohmic heating. Journal of Food Engineering, 87, 351-356.
725
Sastry, S.K., & Palaniappan, S. (1992). Ohmic heating of liquid-particle mixtures: dielectric and
726
ohmic sterilization. Food Technology, 46(12), 64-67.
727
Shirsat, N., Lyng, J., Brunton, N., & McKenna, B. (2004). Conductivities and ohmic heating of
728
meat emulsion batters. Journal of Muscle Foods, 15(2), 121-137.
729
Sui, Z., Lucas, P.W., & Corke, H. (2006). Optimal cooking time of noodles related to their notch
730
sensitivity. Journal of Texture Studies, 37(4), 428-441. 35
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
731
Tan, I., Wee, C.C., Sopade, P.A., & Halley, P.J. (2004). Estimating the Specific Heat Capacity of
732
Starch‐ Water‐ Glycerol Systems as a Function of Temperature and Compositions. Starch‐
733
Stärke, 56(1), 6-12.
734
Torkian Boldaji, M., Mohammd Borghei, A., Beheshti, B., & Ebrahim Hosseini, S. (2015). The
735
process of producing tomato paste by ohmic heating method. Journal of Food Science and
736
Technology, 52, 3598-3606.
737
Tornberg, E. (2013). Engineering processes in meat products and how they influence their
738
biophysical properties. Meat science, 95(4), 871-878.
739
Turp, G.Y., Icier, F., & Kor, G. (2016). Influence of infrared final cooking on color, texture and
740
cooking characteristics of ohmically pre-cooked meatball. Meat science, 114, 46-53.
741
Varghese, K.S., Pandey, M.C., Radhakrishna, K., & Bawa, A.S. (2014). Technology,
742
applications and modelling of ohmic heating: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology,
743
51(10), 2304-2317.
744
Wang, L., Hou, G.G., Hsu, Y.-H., & Zhou, L. (2011). Effect of phosphate salts on the Korean
745
non-fried instant noodle quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 54(3), 506-512.
746
Wongsa-Ngasri, P., & Sastry, S.K. (2015). Effect of ohmic heating on tomato peeling. LWT -
747
Food Science and Technology, 61(2), 269-274.
748
Xue, C., Sakai, N., & Fukuoka, M. (2008). Use of microwave heating to control the degree of
749
starch gelatinization in noodles. Journal of Food Engineering, 87(3), 357-362.
36
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
750
Ye, X., & Sui, Z. (2016). Physicochemical properties and starch digestibility of Chinese noodles
751
in relation to optimal cooking time. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 84,
752
428-433.
753
Yin, Z., Hoffmann, M., & Jiang, S. (2018). Sludge disinfection using electrical thermal treatment:
754
The role of ohmic heating. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 262-271.
755
Yoon, S.W., Lee, C.Y., Kim, K.M., & Lee, C.H. (2002). Leakage of cellular materials from
756
Saccharomyces cerevisiae by ohmic heating. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 12(2),
757
183-188.
758
Zell, M., Lyng, J.G., Morgan, D.J., & Cronin, D.A. (2011). Minimising heat losses during batch
759
ohmic heating of solid food. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 89, 128-134.
760
37
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Data Acquisition System Current
Voltage
Temperature
: Electrical
wiring
: Thermocouple
wiring
Thermocouple
Current Sensor
Electrode
Noodle & Soup Ohmic Container
Safety Fuse
AC Power Supplier (0-220 Vac, 60 Hz)
Electrode
Grounding
Figure 1. A schematic diagram of ohmic heating system for instant noodle cooking.
.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
120
Temperature (°C)
15 V/cm
100 80
17.5 V/cm
10 V/cm
12.5 V/cm
60 40 20 0 0
50
100
150
200
250
Time (s)
300
350
400
(a)
120
Tfs
100
Temperature (°C)
80 Ts
60 40
Tfnl
Tis
20
Tnl
Tinl
0 0 A
50
100
150 B
200
250
C
Time (s) (b) Figure 2. (a) Temperature histories of soup during ohmic heating at different electric fields (10, 12.5, 15 and 17.5 V/cm) and (b) representative comparison of temperature histories between soup and noodles at 15 V/cm electric field application.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Heat transfer ratio (HTnls)
1.0 0.9
a
abcd
0.8
fg
0.7
cde
ef
abc bcde cde
g
a def
abc
fg
h
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3
i j
0.2 0.1 0.0 30
60
Time (s)
90
120
Figure 3. Heat Transfer ratio (HTnls) between noodles and soup as a function of electric field (V/cm) and holding time (s). 10 V/cm, 12.5 V/cm, 15 V/cm, 17.5 V/cm.
a-jMeans
at P<0.05.
(±Standard deviation) with a different letter are significantly different
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3000000
Temperature (°C)
Q ie (W/m3)
100
2500000
80
2000000 Ts
60
1500000 Tnl
40
1000000
20
500000
0
0 0 A
50
100 B
150
200
250
300
Ohmic internal energy generation rate er volume ( W/m3)
120
Time (s)
Figure 4. Temperature histories of soup and noodles versus volumetric internal energy generation rate (W/m3) at 15 V/cm and 120 s holding time.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2.0
a
Hardness (N)
1.6 1.2
d d
cd d
d
d
bc bcd
b b bcd d
bc bcd
cd
0.8 0.4 0.0 30
60 90 Holding time (s)
120
(a) 0.9 Gumminess (N)
0.8
a
0.7
ab
0.6 0.5 0.4
cd cd
d d
bcd cd cd d
bc d
cd
bc cd
cd
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 30
60 90 Holding time (s)
120
(b) Figure 5. (a) Hardness (N) and (b) Gumminess (N) of ohmically cooked noodles as a function of electric field (V/cm) and holding time (s). 10 V/cm, 12.5 V/cm, 15 V/cm ,
17.5 V/cm .a-dMeans (± Standard deviation) with a different letter are
significantly different at P<0.05.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
► Investigate the potential of ohmic heating to cook instant noodles as a function of electric fields (10-17.5 V/cm) and holding times (30, 60, 90 & 120 s). ► Ohmic heating enabled rapid cooking of instant noodles using electric field and internal energy generation. ► Energy efficacy of ohmic heating was promising since most of electrical energy was converted to heat. ► Heat transfer between noodles and soup was expedited at higher electric field application. ► Ohmic heating showed its potential to produce good textural quality of noodles.
Table 1. Comparison of temperature come-up time to 100°C (min), amount of energy in the form of heat (Qtaken, J), total volumetric ohmic internal energy dose (Evd, J), and system performance coefficient (SPC) during temperature come-up time to among different electric fields (10, 12.5, 15 and 17.5 V/cm) Come up time (min)
Amount of energy in the form of heat (Qtaken, J)
Total volumetric ohmic internal energy dose (Evd, J)
Heat loss (J)
System performance coefficient (SPC)
10 V/cm
3.9±0.3a
29605±197ca
49793±2135a
13937±53a
0.46±0.02ba
12.5 V/cm
2.5±0.1b
31970±947bc
48944±4665a
8924±21b
0.56±0.06ab
15 V/cm
2.1±0.2c
36607±1592aa
50859±2209a
7474±37c
0.63±0.05aa
17.5 V/cm
1.3±0.1d
34326±1496ab
51460±3659a
4598±20d
0.58±0.02a
a-dMeans
(±Standard deviation) with a different letter in the same column are significantly different at P<0.05.
Table 2. Estimated coefficients and probability testing of fitted polynomial parameters for heat transfer ratio (Htr) as a function of electric
field
( V ,
V/cm)
and
temperature
holding
time
(t,
min)
during
hydrothermal
processing
( H tr 0 1 V 2 t 3 V 2 4 t 2 5 V t )
β0 -3.001902 0.0001
Coefficients Pr > |t| R2 values SEE (ε)* *Standard error of the estimate.
β1 0.462792 0.0001
β2 0.009153 0.0013
β3 -0.000426 0.0016 0.81 0.09
β4 -0.014338 0.0001
β5 -0.000009 0.5086