BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982 October 15, 1982
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 1313-1319
EVIDENCE CONTRADICTING THE NOTION THAT GONADAL HORMONES REGULATE BRAIN OPIATE RECEPTORS James A. Dies
and David
L. Roberts
School of Biology Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332 Received
September
7, 1982
SUMMARY : Castration of male rats has been reported to increase brain opiate receptors by nearly 100%. We assayed brain opiate receptors with both naloxone and met-enkephalin, but found no effect of gonadectomy on the Kd or Bmax for either ligand in male or female mice or in male rats. Experiments were performed with 2 strains of mice and 3 strains of rats; mice were gonadectomized 1-7 weeks and rats were castrated 3 weeks before assay. Both washed and unwashed brain membrane preparations were used. Administration of testosterone or estrogen to intact male or female mice did not alter opiate receptors. Castration did not affect the strain or age and brain-region differences found for naloxone binding in male rats.
The mechanisms late
steroid
rent
data
suggest
Physiological inhibit
that
the
secretion
endogenous
opiate
ability
of steroid (3). Data which
action
to up-
workers
and low-
agonists
One attractive is
hypothesis
found
a nearly
from
is
modulate
the
have been receptors
the
for
other
reported
100% increase
opiate
for
receptors
the
hypothesis
a good precedent
regulate
this
could
can
while
agonists
or affinity
or down-
affinity
opiate
cur-
role.
hormones,
to displace
there
to regubut
an important
that
(1,2).
act
uncertain,
releasing
concentration
support
Those high-
indicate
acting
hormones;
hormones directly
(4).
of both
their
systems
still
may play
hypothalamic
receptor
of steroid
ligands
control are
opiates
studies
of several
can block in
control
and Fishman
feedback
in vertebrates
such as naloxone,
receptor, changes
feedback
(Bmax)
that
antagonists
opiate
negative
secretion
and pharmacological
the
opiate
by which
hormone
by Hahn
in the
number
in the brains
of
male rats which had been castrated had been injected with testosterone
for 3 weeks. The Bmax in castrates which propionate for 7 days was the same as
intact
constants
controls.
The dissociation
(Kd)
did
not
differ
This report has been widely cited (e.g., crine status. to provide some of the first and perhaps best evidence
of how the
control
receptor
of steroid
hormones
could
interact
with
opiate
3,5)
with
since
it
endoseems
feedback
regulation.
0006-291X/82/191313-07$01.00/0 1313
Copyrighr 0 1982 by Academic Press, Inc. Ail righrs of reproduction in any form reserved.
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982 Our original examining mice. receptor by us) we also
the
effects
sites,
of other
different both
thought
steroid
ligands
naltrexone to bind
the
or delta
of gonadal
or in male
(8)
hormones
(used
of Hahn and Fishman on brain
which With
on brain
opiate binding
by Hahn and Fishman)
to the mu receptor
sites.
hormones
findings
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
can show preferential
used methionine-enkephalin,
the mu (7) effect
AND BIOPHYSICAL
aim was to extend
Although are
BIOCHEMICAL
these opiate
site
(6).
receptors
receptors
in
to specific
and naloxone
(used
In some experiments,
may be the physiologic ligands,
by
however, in male
ligand we found or female
for no mice
rats. Materials
and Methods
C57BL/6J and Swiss albino mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and ARS/Sprague Dawley, respectively; the mice were then bred and maintained in our colony under standard laboratoryconditions. Rats were obtained from Charles River Breeding Labs and maintained for at least 2 weeks before use in experiments. Gonadectomies were performed under Nembutal anaesthesia. Testosterone propionate or estradiol benzoate were administered subcutaneously by injection in sesame oil or by implantation of Silastic capsules (1.6&m x 1Omm) which had been packed with hormone and soaked in saline for 24 hrs. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation; rats were decapitated. Regional brain dissections followed the method of Glowinski and Iversen (9). Protein was assayed by the method of Lowry, et al. (10). Brain regions or whole brains minus cerebella were pooled 5-8 per group and homogenized in 10 volumes of cold Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.7) with a Tekmar Tissumizer at high speed. Following centrifugation at 30,000 x g for 20 min, pellets for "unwashed" preparations were resuspended in 75 volumes of Tris buffer and frozen for l-7 days. 'For "washed" membrane preparations, the pellet was resuspended in 75 vol of Tris and incubated at room temperature for 1 hr before recentrifuging and freezing. In some experiments, we followed the procedures outlined by Hahn and Fishman (4): tissue was homogenized in 5 volumes with a Teflon-pestle homogenizer and the pellet from an initial centrifugation at 1000 x g was discarded before the high speed (17,500 x g) pellet was finally resuspended in 60 volumes. In our standard opiate receptor assay, membrane fragments containing approximately 0.2 mg protein were incubated for 3 hr on ice in 1.0 ml of Tris buffer containing 0.16 to 12.0 nM of [N-allyl-2,3-3H]naloxone or [tyrosyl-3,5-3H(N)]met-enkephalin (New England Nuclear; 30-50 Ci/m mol). Bacitracin (50 ug/ml) was added when enkephalin was used. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 10 uM morphine or met-enkephalin. Membrane fragments were collected by filtration on Whatman GF/C filters and rapidly washed twice with 5 ml of cold Tris. Vacuum-dried filters were shaken overnight in 10 ml of ACS (Amersham) before liquid scintillation counting. In some experiments, the incubation was performed at room temperature for 1 hr plus 15 min on ice. In both cases, it was determined that binding was at equilibrium and linear beyond the range of tissue concentration used. These methods differed from Hahn and Fishman as follows: they used 2.0 ml of tissue preparation and incubated for 15 min at 37O plus 30 min on ice; they used [3H]naltrexone as the ligand (2 x lo-lo to 7.5 x 10-q M) and non-radioactive naltrexone (low6 M) for non-specific binding; filters (GF/B) were washed twice with 4 ml of Tris. After correction for non-specific binding, the Kd and Bmax were calculated from Scatchard plots using a program written for an Apple II+ computer. For a linear Scatchard plot (i.e., enkephalin binding), all points were included in the least-squares regression analysis. Curved Scatchard plots (i.e., naloxone binding) were split into highand low- affinity 1314
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982
BIOCHEMICAL
an iterative fragments; binding component from
AND BIOPHYSICAL
procedure the points
was used to remove in the low affinity
Results Naloxone
and enkephalin
sham-operated,
two "unwashed"
preparations
receptors
were
assayed
dectomy,
using
both
We occasionally if
these
found
random
results Since
various
receptors
(11)
naloxone found
A species Fishman's (13). is
of gonadal
already
testosterone of gonadal benzoate
twice
experiment
opiate
The species-difference
preparations experiment, rats;
in
and the
were
with always
we found the second Long Evans
to be
castrates
and
of gonadectomy. in opiate
we also mice,
examined
but
still
induced
by
administered to see if
receptors.
elevations
We found
propionate
Silastic
to achieve
no effect
or estradiol
implants
were
a more persistent
as shown in Figure
used hor-
3, adminis-
to females had no deas measured by [ 3 H]naloxone binding.
receptors,
was then
tissues
no effect (Figure 4). The apparent Kd's binding were similar in the two strains, 1315
by comparing In the
rats. were
used;
castration.
castrated
from for
directly
male
strains
days after between
re-assayed
tested
and intact
two different
made 21-23
experiment,
receptors
increase
mice
and
mice or of estrogen
no difference samples
in rats
of opiate
We therefore
negative;
Hahn and
effects
a further
a week.
of castrated rats,
to confirm level
opiate
hypothesis
in brains
failure
of testosterone
in order
were
to male
on brain
of experiments
albino
or female
a day for
The results
of testosterone
our
male
100 rig/kg
series
(12),
Swiss
be seen.
down-regulate
receptors
as likely
some differences
and that
cannot
would
opiate
effect
the steady-state
to intact
injected
effect
was small,
between
to have different
in which
8 days in another
tectable
explain
"maximum"
hormones
steroids
mone elevation.
25%) in binding,
1 and 2.
administration
known that
or estrogen
were
tration
could
at its
in one experiment
procedures.
and were
comparisons
in outbred
are
We hypothesized
removal
than
gona-
castration.
opiates
in mice
after
the preparations
or reproducible
to opioid
difference
report:
as in
as the
of the 1000 x g pellet);
experiments
in Figures
binding
after
(less
of mice may exhibit
or response
and enkephalin no effect
mice
strains
across
a major
are presented
as well
1 and 7 weeks
in
intact,
in several
and ice-bath'incubation brains
groups
from
mice
fragments
removal
between
differences
of pooled
sham -vs. control We never observed
controls.
times
moderate
were
in preparations C57BL/6
membrane
and without
room temperature
in the
Typical
for
(with
the number
differences
assayed
"washed"
at various
the
were
male and female
standard
observed
particularly but
binding
We used our
the high affinity range, and vice-versa.
and Discussion
and gonadectomized
experiments.
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Sprague
Dawley
for
high
but
the Bmax's
receptor
In the first
and control
comparison.
first
rats
Again,
and low
Long Evans
affinity
were
were
assayed
castration
had
naloxone
markedly
higher
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL CONTROL o CASTRATE l
.06
.04
MALES
.024r
A.
\ .o \ '\
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Y"
B/F .02
.I0
0
.I5
1
Bound
.03
(nM/mg -CONTROL A SHAM novx
.06
.09
protein) FEMALES
.06r
B.
.024r
B/F
0
I
2
1
/
05
I
.I0
1
I
.06
.09
(nM/mg protein) on brain opiate receptors in male mice. Data represent means of two experiments, 21 and 51 days after castration; washed membranes were used. Constants were derived from combined data. A. Naloxone (high- and low- affinity sites): Kd= 0.98 and 17.5 nM; Bmax= 0.04 and 0.25 nM/mg prot. z. Enkephalin: Kd- 5.49 nM; Bmax= 0.12 nM/m8 prot. 1
No effect
of
castration
Fig.
2
No effect mice.
of
ovariectomy
(OVX)
g. Enkephalin:
the Long
since
the Long
might
declines lobe
Evans
an increase After
Evans
rats
in rat
hypothalamus
Compared
with
This
in older
male adult
were
receptors
receptors
in
female
OVX. Treatment groups (high- and low0.22 nM/mg prot.
Naloxone 0.05 and
considerably
young
were
a true
older
CD rats assayed
than
With striatum
strain
difference,
but
the Sprague-Dawley's,
aging,
S-endorphin
and increases
adult male rats, old adults and naloxone was much less
in
content frontal
had higher levels potent in inducing
(15). of gonadal
of different
male
represent
and corpus
no effect
rats
A. B&x=
an age difference.
in LH secretion finding
21 days after
constants. 14.72 nM;
could
met-enkephalin,
in young Opiate
strain.
represent
(14).
and
opiate
Kd= 6.3 nM; Bmax= 0.12 nM/mg prot.
simply
of hypothalamic
on brain
were used,
were combined for calculating affinity sites): Kd= 1.65
it
9
.03
Bound
Fig.
Washed membrane fragments
in
I
.I5
strains, since
these
hormones
we examined were
23 days after 1316
in male
or female
the effect
mice or
of castration
used by Hahn and Fishman castration;
hypothalamus
(4). and the
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
A.
8.
.12-
.12-1
.00-
*CONTROL 0 ESTRAMOL
l0 Control TESTOSTERONE
P
0 .08
l
-1
l =\
B/F
B/F
.04-
-
-
.04
I .I
I
03
I
I
,
.2
.3
.4
Bound
t
(nM
Img
LONG
.05
0
.I0
EVANS 0 CONTROL
.I5
1
I
I
I
.I
.2
.3
.4
protein)
A
I
-
SPRAGUE
CASTRATE
.20
DAWLEY
l
.
.25
.30
.35
Bound ( nM / mg protein)
4
3 No effect in intact
Fig.
of gonadal mice.
steroid
administration
on [3H]naloxone
binding
Assays were performed 8 days after implantation of 10 mm Silastic capsules. A. Males + testosterone: Kd= 1.36 and 20.1 nM; Bmax= 0.12 and 0.60 nM/mg Trot. B.-Females + estradiol: Kd= 1.22 and 34.72 nM; Bmax= 0.12 and 0.85 nM/mg pyot. Fig. 4 No effect of castration on [3H]naloxone Mean body weights: Long Evans= 632 g; Sprague were derived from combined data. Long Evans Sprague nM; Bmax= 0.05 and 0.50 nM/mg prot. 8.27 nM; Bmax= 0.02 and 0.31 nM/mg prot.
rest our
of the brain standard
(minus
washed
membrane
by Hahn and Fishman. Specific and
binding
castrate-
(tissue bound
cerebellum)
tissues
preparation
As shown
tended
preparation-naloxone
hardly
assayed and the
in Figure
to be higher were
were
binding in 2 strains of rat. Dawley= 381 g. Constants (2 expts.): Kd= 0.55 and 10.3 Dawley (1 expt.): Kd= 0.31 and
unwashed
5, no marked
in the washed distinguishable,
concentration)
separately.
We used both preparation
differences
preparation; but
comparisons,
used were
found.
the control-
in 30 of 34 direct the control
samples
more naloxone. Despite
receptors,
our
inability
the original
to find hypothesis
a castration-induced of regulation 1317
increase by a testosterone
in opiate feedback
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982
CONTROL
CASTRATE Membrane8 WASHED UNWASHED
‘; .
n .
.2Or
.I5 B/F .I0 -
.4 Bound
.5
.6
.?
(nbl / mg protein)
I
C
-
I
C
,250 ,200 nM
ma Prd .I50 t 7 ; L
06
cx
MP
3 2 STR
3 51
7 f L
6.0nM
c
Q6nM
MB
Fig. 5 No effect of castration on [3H]naloxone binding in young CD male rats. Mean body weight= 227 g. A. Hypothalamus: Kd= 1.04 and 23.4 nM; Bmax= 0.20 and 0.70 nM/mg prot. 2. Rest of Brain (minus cerebellum): Kd= 1.15 and 28.7 nM; Bmax= 0.22 and 1.2 nM/mg prot. Fig.
6
Regional
analysis
of
[3H]naloxone
binding
in
castrated
(C)
and
intact
(I) male rats. Long Evans rats (mean weight= 656 g) were used 21 days after castration. Brain regions from 5 (C) and 4 (I) rats were pooled and assayed in triplicate with 0.6 and 6.0 nM naloxone. PIT= pituitary; g= cerebral cortex; g= hypothalamus; D= striatum; MB= midbrain. -MP= medulla-pons;
control
receptor castration
system
still
concentration in 5 rat
show regional
seemed attractive. have been brain regions
differences
Although naltrexone sites (6), the difference
Since
described (16), and pituitary.
but no difference
regional
differences
we looked for The results,
between
control
in
an effect in Figure
opiate
of 6,
and castrated
and naloxone presumably bind to the same receptor between our results and those of Hahn and Fishman 1318
rats.
Vol. 108, No. 3, 1982 could
be due to the
available play
BIOCHEMICAL
commercially;
a significant (17)
to find
bind have
results
that
we wish
increase
in vacant
centrations" binding
assay
ligand
would
decrease washed
act
preparations
rat
results
opiate
receptors;
problem
in
prevents
readily do not
naloxone
brain.
negative
on brain
not
hormones
to which
mouse or male
technical
result
that
the
increase
of an increased
or
Wilkenson a limited
these
attempt
workers
sus-
us from observing
receptors
due to a reduction be pointed
should the
to increase with
Scatchard the
no change
do not
suggest
out,
apparent
opiate
binding
of receptors
in endogenous however,
plot
is affinity
in Bmax.
in
number
It
upon which
the Kd),
gonadal
the receptors
reported
suggested
be the (4).
that
is
the
to see...."
Hahn and Fishman could
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
L3H]Naltrexone
conclude
or female
recently
some purely
observed
used.
regulating
of castration
I'... that
pected
in
in male
also
an effect
ligands
we can only role
met-enkephalin et al.
different
AND BIOPHYSICAL
that
based,
ligand
con-
in the equilibrium in endogenous
of the binding effect
they
or llan
a decrease
Our results
a significant
which
with
(i.e.,
washed
of endogenous
and unligand.
Acknowledgement This work was supported RR07024-16.
by a Biomedical
Research
Support
Grant,
PH.5 SO7-
References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.
Van Vugt, D. A., and Meites, J. (1980) Federation Proc. 39, 2533-2538. Cicero, T. J. (1980) Federation Proc. 39, 2551-2554. McEwen, B. S. (1980) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 18, 151-164. Hahn, E. F., and Fishman, J. (1979) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 90, 819-823. Krieger, D. T. and Martin, J, B. (1981) New Engl. J. Med. 304, 876-885. and Cuatrecasas, P. (1981) Federation Proc. 40, 2729-2734. Chang, K.-J., Goodman, R. R., Snyder, S. H., Kuhar, M. J., and Young, W. S., III. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 77, 6239-6243. Chang, K.-J., and Cuatrecasas, P. (1979) J. biol. Chem. 254, 2610-2618. Glowinski, J., and Iversen, L. E. (1966) J. Neurochem 13, 655-699. Lowry, 0. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. .I., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Baran, A., Shuster, L., Eleftheriou, B. E., and Bailey, D. W. (1975) Life Sciences 17, 633-640. Waterfield, A. A., Lord, J.A.H., Hughes, J., and Kosterlitz, H.W. (1978) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 47, 249-250. Kuschinsky, K., and Hornykiewicz, 0. (1974) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 26, 41-50. Gambert, S. R., Garthwaite, T. L., Pontzer, C. H. and Hagen, T. C. (1980) Neuroendo. 31, 252-255. Steger, R. W., Sonntag, W. E., Van Vugt, D. A., Forman, L. J., and Meites, J. (1980) Life Sciences 27, 747-753. Chang, K.-J., Cooper, B. R., Hazum, E., and Cuatrecasas, P. (1979) Mol. Pharmacol. 16, 91-104. C. A. (1981) In Steroid Hormone Wilkenson, M., Herdon, H., and Wilson, Regulation K. Fuxe, J. A. Gustafsson, anntterburg, --of the Brain, eds., Pp 253-263, Pergamon Press, New York. 1319